1. The most striking part of Henry's story is his experience as a prisoner of war and his escape from the Soviet Union.
2. Henry's story is an autobiography because it is a firsthand account of his own life.
3. Hitler was able to gain the support of many German people through a combination of propaganda, fear, and promises of economic and military prosperity.
4. Henry's family was greatly affected by Hitler's tactics and beliefs.
5. When Henry immigrated to the United States, he would have been considered a migrant, as he chose to leave his home country voluntarily in search of better opportunities.
1. He vividly describes the inhumane treatment and the harsh conditions he endured during his captivity, making it an unforgettable part of his story.
2. He tells the reader about his childhood, his education, his family, and his experiences before, during, and after World War II. He talks about his love of music, his relationships, and his struggles, making it a personal and introspective account of his life.
3. He used rallies, speeches, and media to spread his message, and he blamed Germany's problems on Jews and other minority groups, stirring up hate and nationalism. He also promised to restore Germany's power and prestige, appealing to those who were disillusioned with the Weimar Republic and the Treaty of Versailles.
4. His father lost his job and was forced to work in a factory, his sister was harassed and eventually expelled from school, and his mother suffered from anxiety and depression. Henry himself was conscripted into the army and became a prisoner of war, enduring terrible conditions and risking his life.
5.However, he could also be considered a refugee, as he faced persecution and danger in his home country and had to flee for his safety. The distinction between migrant and refugee can be blurred, and in Henry's case, it is a matter of interpretation and perspective. Regardless of how he is classified, Henry's story is a powerful reminder of the challenges and opportunities that come with starting a new life in a foreign country.
To learn more about tactics and beliefs, here
https://brainly.com/question/30520648
#SPJ1
1234567
for which purpose might a country use propaganda?
to highlight the troubles within a country to ask for help
to show only the good things about that country
to make people want to leave their country and visit another
to help promote education and new ideas within their country
to show only the good things about that country
Whom is Representative Riddle describing in this account of the end of the First Battle of Bull Run?
The account given by Representative Riddle is describing the Union soldiers retreating from the First Battle of Bull Run during the American Civil War.
In the account, Riddle describes the chaos and panic that ensued as Union soldiers attempted to retreat from the battle. He notes that soldiers were throwing away their arms and equipment and that the scene was one of utter confusion. The account provides a vivid picture of the disorganized state of the Union army during this early stage of the war.
Learn more about Riddle:
https://brainly.com/question/18297870
#SPJ4
The Nuremberg Laws can be seen a a step toward the Holocaust because they
gave Hitler absolute power
resulted in the building of labor camps
deprived Jews of citizenship
described the Nazi policy of genocide
Answer:
C. Deprived Jews of citizenship.
Explanation:
The Nuremberg Laws were a series of anti-Semitic laws introduced by the Nazi government in Germany in 1935. These laws deprived Jews of their citizenship and rights, and aimed to isolate and segregate them from the rest of German society. They prohibited marriage or sexual relations between Jews and non-Jews, and also defined who was considered to be a "Jew" based on racial criteria.
The Nuremberg Laws can be seen as a significant step towards the Holocaust, as they laid the legal groundwork for the persecution of Jews and other minority groups. They created a legal framework that allowed for the systematic discrimination and marginalization of Jews, which ultimately culminated in their deportation to concentration camps and the mass murder of millions during the Holocaust.
Renaissance and Reformation Assignment
Objectives
Evaluate the nature of the Scientific Revolution as a revolution.
Explain the relationship between the Scientific Revolution and ideas about individualism and secularism.
For this activity, answer the following questions.
How revolutionary was the Scientific Revolution? Cite at least three examples from the text as evidence to support your opinion.
How did the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Scientific Revolution work together to advance individualism and secularism?
The Renaissance was a cultural movement that started in Italy and spread throughout Europe, whereas the Reformation was a Christian movement in Northern Europe.
What kind of revolution was the Scientific Revolution?It supplanted the Greek perspective on nature that had overwhelmed science for just about 2,000 years. The Scientific Revolution was characterized by the development of an experimental scientific method, an emphasis on abstract reasoning, quantitative thought, a comprehension of nature's workings, and the view of nature as a machine.
Why is the Scientific Revolution regarded as one of history's most significant revolutions?Significance. In institutions that supported scientific investigation and in the more widely held picture of the universe, the time period saw a fundamental transformation in scientific ideas across mathematics, physics, astronomy, and biology. Numerous modern sciences were established as a result of the Scientific Revolution.
How did the Logical Upheaval add to independence?The Logical Upheaval affected the improvement of the Edification upsides of independence since it showed the force of the human brain. The individual's capabilities and worth were demonstrated by scientists' ability to draw their own conclusions rather than relying on established authority.
To learn more about Renaissance visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29773671
#SPJ1
The belief that an individual's freedoms should be exercised independently of the state is known as individualism.
It is a political and philosophical concept that shifts society's perspective to place more value on the individual and their inherent worth.
The emphasis of secularism was on rejecting religious doctrine. People wanted to worship in their own way or be able to choose not to during a time of strict religious rule.
How revolutionary was the Scientific Revolution?Theories and novel concepts about how humans and Earth began were part of the scientific revolution. Humanism thrived in the Renaissance. Instead of focusing on religious beliefs, it emphasized human values. During the Reformation, people referred to religious ideas and salvation. By encouraging more ideas, scientific discoveries, and brand-new inventions, these three collaborated to advance secularism and individualism.
Learn more about Scientific revolution:
brainly.com/question/760712
#SPJ1
8LEQ
Question 1
In your response, you will be assessed on the following.
Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning.
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt.
Support an argument in response to the prompt using specific and relevant examples of evidence.
Use historical reasoning (e. G. ,comparison,causation,continuityor
change) to frame or structure an argument that addresses the
prompt.
Use evidence to corroborate, qualify,or modify an argument that addresses the prompt.
Prompt:
In the period since 1900, scientific and technological advances have been made with the intention of increasing efficiency, comfort, and security in societies around the world.
Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which scientific and technological advances have benefited human societies since 1900
Colonialism played a significant role in shaping the global economy, as it facilitated the subnet and wealth from colonized nations to imperial powers, thereby creating an economic system that prioritized the interests of the colonizers over those of the colonized.
Historical context: During the era of European colonialism, which lasted from the 16th to the 20th century, European powers established colonies across the globe in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. These colonies were established for a variety of reasons, including economic exploitation, political dominance, and cultural assimilation. The economic aspect of colonialism was particularly important, as it allowed imperial powers to extract resources and wealth from colonized nations and integrate them into the global economy.
Supporting evidence: One example of how colonialism contributed to the development of the global economy is the Transatlantic Slave Trade, which involved the forced migration of millions of Africans to the Americas to work on plantations and in mines.
This trade was driven by the demand for cheap labor to extract valuable resources such as sugar, tobacco, and gold. Another example is the British colonization of India, which resulted in the forced cultivation of cash crops such as cotton and tea, leading to the development of industries in Britain that were dependent on these products.
Historical reasoning: By analyzing the continuity and change in the global economic system before and after colonialism, it becomes clear that colonialism played a significant role in shaping the economic landscape of the world. Prior to colonialism, the global economy was characterized by regional trade networks and self-sufficient economies.
After colonialism, however, the global economy became more integrated and dominated by imperial powers who controlled the flow of resources and wealth. This shift in the global economic system can be traced to the exploitative practices of colonialism, which prioritized the interests of imperial powers over those of colonized nations.
To learn more about colonialism refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13673860
#SPJ11
The beliefs expressed by hoover in this excerpt influenced him to adopt policies that led to
a
increased business regulations and worker's rights protections. b
the repeal of jim crow laws and improved rights for african americans. c
us isolationism and the country's refusal to join the league of nations. d
government inaction that worsened the great depression’s effects
The beliefs expressed by hoover in this excerpt influenced him to adopt policies that led to government inaction that worsened the great depression’s effects. However, his policies during the Great Depression resulted in government inaction that worsened its effects. The correct answer is D.
This realization may have influenced Hoover to adopt policies that improved rights for African Americans and led to the repeal of Jim Crow laws.
Perhaps Hoover recognized that government inaction was not always the answer, and that sometimes it was necessary for the government to step in and take action to right wrongs and provide support to those who needed it most.
To know more about Great Depression, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180#
#SPJ11
Evaluate the extent to which the Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975
The Vietnam War caused social unrest in the United States from 1964-1975 in a massive way.
There was much opposition to the Involvement of the US in the Vietnam War, as it not just caused death but also social riots in the country.
The Vietnam War was a prolonged military conflict that involved a cold war between many countries.
The main reason for the war was a division of Vietnam and to gain power. The United States was involved in the war fully supporting southern Vietnam.
The war just not killed my US soldiers and troops but also created riots within the country. Many of them were not happy with the involvement of the US in the war.
The war experienced many campaigns and bombings.
Learn more about Vietnam War:
https://brainly.com/question/12918391
#SPJ4
Why did Russia want to take control of Korea paragraphs 3
Russia wanted to take control of Korea for several reasons, including its strategic location, natural resources, and as a buffer against potential enemies.
In the late 19th century, Russia was a rising power in Asia and saw Korea as a potential area for expansion. Korea was strategically located between China and Japan, two powers that Russia saw as potential rivals in the region. Control over Korea would provide Russia with a foothold in the region and help secure its eastern borders.
Moreover, Russia saw Korea as a buffer against potential enemies. Japan had already established a presence in Korea and was becoming increasingly powerful, and Russia saw Korea as a way to prevent Japan from expanding its influence in the region. In 1904, Russia went to war with Japan over control of Korea and other territories in the region. After the war, Korea became a protectorate of Japan, which ruled the country until the end of World War II.
In summary, Russia wanted to take control of Korea for its strategic location, natural resources, and as a buffer against potential enemies in the region. However, its ambitions were thwarted by Japan in the early 20th century.
To know more about Korea, click here
https://brainly.com/question/11636598
#SPJ1
What claims does President Truman make about why the aid to Greece is necessary
President Truman claims that aid to Greece is necessary because the country is facing a communist insurgency that threatens to overthrow its democratic government.
In his speech to Congress on March 12, 1947, Truman argued that the United States had a moral obligation to support Greece and other nations facing similar threats to their freedom and independence. He also emphasized the strategic importance of Greece as a bulwark against Soviet expansion in the Eastern Mediterranean.
By providing economic and military aid to Greece, Truman hoped to strengthen its ability to resist communist subversion and maintain stability in the region.
Ultimately, Truman's policy of containment aimed to contain Soviet influence and prevent the spread of communism around the world.
To know more about democratic government click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/2849514#
#SPJ11
Pls Help
Seeing as though the Cold War did not produce
active fighting between the U.S. and U.S.S.R., how
important do you think this war was to history? Why?
(Minimum of 3 sentences, 3pts
The Cold War was an incredibly important event in world history despite the fact that it did not produce active fighting between the United States and the Soviet Union.
The Cold War was a period of geopolitical tension and ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted from the end of World War II until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Although the Cold War did not result in direct military conflict between the two superpowers, it had far-reaching consequences for the world, including the arms race, proxy wars, and the division of the world into two spheres of influence.
The Cold War was important because it shaped the course of world events for over four decades. It led to the development of nuclear weapons and the arms race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which had a significant impact on global politics, economics, and society. The rivalry between the two superpowers also led to the division of the world into two spheres of influence, with the U.S. and its allies in the West, and the Soviet Union and its allies in the East.
To know more about Cold War, click here
https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ1
We have been invited to shed our innocent blood in this world war which is now in
progress. In the past, it was said indirectly that Africa had nothing to do with the
civilized world. But now we find that the poor African has already been plunged
into the great war. The masses of our people are ready to put on uniforms, ignorant
of what they have to face or why they have to face it. We natives have been loyal
since the commencement of this (British) Government, and in all departments of
Nyasaland the welfare of the British would have been incomplete without our
loyalty. But in time of peace the Government failed to help the underdog. In time
of peace everything was for Europeans only. But in time of war it has been found
that we are needed to share hardships and shed our blood in equality. The poor
Africans who have nothing to win in this present world are invited to die for a
cause which is not theirs.
*The letter was published but later retracted by the newspaper's British editors,
A broader historical context relevant to the prompt is the colonization of Africa by European powers and their exploitation of African resources and labor.
European powers, including Britain, colonized various regions of Africa during the 19th and early 20th centuries, often with the goal of exploiting their resources and labor. This led to the subjugation of African peoples, who were treated as inferior and denied basic rights and freedoms. The British government, in particular, implemented policies that favored European settlers and did little to improve the lives of Africans.
This legacy of exploitation and inequality continued through the early 20th century, leading to the frustration expressed by the speaker in the prompt. The outbreak of World War II, with its need for manpower and resources, led to a shift in attitudes towards African participation in the war effort. However, this shift was not accompanied by a corresponding shift in attitudes towards African rights and equality, leading to continued tensions and frustrations among African peoples.
-----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"We have been invited to shed our innocent blood in this world war which is now in progress. In the past, it was said indirectly that Africa had nothing to do with the civilized world. But now we find that the poor African has already been plunged into the great war. The masses of our people are ready to put on uniforms, ignorant of what they have to face or why they have to face it. We natives have been loyal since the commencement of this (British) Government, and in all departments of Nyasaland the welfare of the British would have been incomplete without our loyalty. But in time of peace the Government failed to help the underdog. In time of peace everything was for Europeans only. But in time of war it has been found that we are needed to share hardships and shed our blood in equality. The poor Africans who have nothing to win in this present world are invited to die for a cause which is not theirs.
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt?"------------
To know more about colonization , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an example of a primary source?
OA. A biography of a famous politician
OB. A video recording of a political protest
OC. A documentary film about a war
D. A textbook about a powerful empire
Answer:
B m A video recording of a political protest.
Explain the historical circumstances that led to the historical development of the following image:
Use the following vocabulary
Europeans/Europe/Great Britain
Ghana/Kenya/Kwame Nkrumah/Jomo Kenyatta
Pan-Africanism/nationalism
decolonization
as a result/so/because/led to
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, European powers, especially Great Britain, colonized much of Africa, including Ghana and Kenya.
This period of colonialism, where European powers established political and economic control over African territories, lasted until the mid-20th century. In response to this colonization, Pan-Africanism and nationalism emerged as movements calling for African unity and self-determination. Leaders like Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana and Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya played significant roles in these movements.
As a result of these movements, African countries began to gain their independence from their colonizers. Decolonization of Africa began in the 1950s and continued through the 1960s. The struggle for independence was often long and violent, but eventually, most African countries became independent nations.
The image that developed was that of a newly independent Africa, with countries led by African leaders who had fought for their nations' freedom. These leaders often espoused Pan-African ideals of unity and cooperation between African countries, and nationalism, which celebrated African culture and traditions. The image of a decolonized Africa represented hope for a continent that had suffered from European exploitation and oppression for centuries.
To know more about Europeans here
https://brainly.com/question/24877599
#SPJ1
Do you believe that congressional members should be elected by popular vote? why or why not? use an example from the lesson to support your opinion. your answer should be at least one hundred and fifty words.
Yes, I believe that congressional members should be elected by popular vote.
In a democratic society, it is important for the people to have a say in who represents them in government. The current system of allowing state legislatures to choose senators and having districts drawn in a way that favors one political party over another (gerrymandering) can lead to a lack of representation and political polarization.
For example, in the lesson we learned about the case of North Carolina's congressional districts being redrawn to favor Republican candidates, leading to an imbalance in representation. This shows how the current system can be manipulated for political gain, rather than allowing for fair and equal representation of all constituents.
By allowing congressional members to be elected by popular vote, it ensures that the people's voices are heard and their needs and concerns are represented in government.
It also promotes a more diverse and inclusive representation, rather than one that is dominated by a particular political party or interest group. Overall, a popular vote system for congressional members would lead to a more democratic and equitable society.
To know more about political polarization click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31375833#
#SPJ11
Which claim about the constitution best reflects the point of view that marshall expresses his bicentennial speech? help please! i keep getting these 2 questions wrong.
In his bicentennial speech, Marshall emphasized the importance of the Constitution as a document that established the framework for a strong federal government. He argued that the Constitution was not only a legal document but also a moral one and that it was essential to uphold the principles it embodied to maintain a just and free society.
The claim that best reflects Marshall's point of view in his bicentennial speech is that the Constitution is a vital and enduring document that serves as the foundation for American democracy and should be upheld and respected. Marshall's speech also emphasized the need for the judiciary to interpret the Constitution in a way that upheld its principles and protected individual rights. He argued that the Supreme Court had a crucial role in ensuring that the government remained within the limits set by the Constitution and that it was essential to maintain the balance of power between the different branches of government.
Know more about the bicentennial speech:
https://brainly.com/question/17919459
#SPJ11
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Jim Crow laws are
passed in the South.
A. The Ku Klux Klan is forced to disband.
B. African Americans are forced to leave the South.
C. The Freedmen's Bureau gains influence.
D. Public services become racially segregated.
?
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Public services become racially segregated
What significant events are occurring or have occurred surrounding Immigration Right Movement
Answer:
The Immigration Rights Movement has been marked by a number of significant events in recent years. Here are some examples:
1. The Trump administration's immigration policies: The Trump administration implemented a number of controversial immigration policies, including the "travel ban" on individuals from several predominantly Muslim countries, the separation of families at the U.S.-Mexico border, and the attempted repeal of the DACA program. These policies sparked widespread protests and activism from the Immigration Rights Movement.
2. The rise of sanctuary cities: In response to the Trump administration's immigration policies, a number of cities and municipalities declared themselves "sanctuary cities," which are places that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities and provide protections for undocumented immigrants.
3. The ongoing border crisis: The United States is currently facing a crisis at the southern border, with a large number of immigrants and asylum seekers arriving from Central America. This has led to a number of challenges, including overcrowding at detention centers and a backlog of immigration cases.
4. The Biden administration's immigration policies: The Biden administration has promised to take a more compassionate and humane approach to immigration, including a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and a reversal of some of the Trump administration's policies. However, progress on these issues has been slow, and there is still much work to be done to address the challenges facing immigrants in the United States.
Overall, the Immigration Rights Movement is ongoing, with significant events occurring on a regular basis. These events highlight the importance of continuing to advocate for the rights of immigrants and push for policy changes to create a more just and inclusive society.
Explanation:
As governor of georgia, jimmy carter actively supported the republican party
integration
segregation
the republican party
all of lester maddox's policies
As governor of georgia, jimmy carter actively supported the republican party integration.
As governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter actively supported integration and opposed segregation, which put him at odds with Governor Lester Maddox and the policies of the Democratic Party at the time. However, he did not support the Republican Party during his time as governor.
As governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter actively supported integration, not segregation. He supported the end of segregation in public schools, abolished the state's discriminatory voting system, and worked to appoint African Americans to state boards and commissions.
Carter was a member of the Democratic Party and not the Republican Party. He served as Georgia's governor from 1971 to 1975 before running for President as a Democrat in 1976, which he won. During his presidency, he continued to support integration and civil rights, signing legislation to strengthen the Voting Rights Act and creating the Department of Education.
Lester Maddox was a segregationist and a political opponent of Carter. Maddox served as Georgia's governor from 1967 to 1971 and was known for his opposition to integration and his support for segregation. Carter ran for governor against Maddox in 1970 and won, becoming Georgia's first governor to support integration and civil rights.
To know more about republican party integration refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31874305#
#SPJ11
In july 1914, Austria-Hungary took a strong stand against serbia in order to?
Answer:
In July 1914, Austria-Hungary took a strong stand against Serbia in order to punish them for the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which they believed was orchestrated by Serbian officials. This led to a series of events that ultimately sparked World War I.
Explanation:
In July 1914, Austria-Hungary took a strong stand against Serbia in order to assert their dominance in the Balkans, maintain political stability within their empire, and respond to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
On June 28, 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo. Austria-Hungary blamed Serbia for the assassination and issued an ultimatum demanding Serbia's compliance with their demands. Serbia agreed to most of the demands, but Austria-Hungary still declared war on Serbia on July 28, 1914.
This triggered a series of alliances and mobilizations that ultimately led to World War I. Austria-Hungary's strong stand against Serbia was driven by a desire for revenge and a need to assert their dominance in the Balkan region, where they faced competition from other great powers such as Russia.
Learn more about Serbia: https://brainly.com/question/31608861
#SPJ11
what was the Weimar Republic?
Answer: 1933, after the end of World War I and the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II. It was named after the city of Weimar, where the new constitution was written and adopted in 1919.
The Weimar Republic was marked by a period of political, social, and economic instability. The government faced significant challenges, including inflation, unemployment, political extremism, and the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. However, during its brief existence, the Weimar Republic made significant strides in social and cultural progress, including the promotion of women's rights, freedom of expression, and the arts.
The Weimar Republic came to an end in 1933 when Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party seized power and established a dictatorship. The failure of the Weimar Republic to address the challenges it faced paved the way for the rise of the Nazis and the horrors of World War II.
Explanation: can i get brainliest :D
According to Thomas Hobbes in the "state of nature" without government there would be peace. True
False
Answer:
The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) famously leaned in the latter direction. He argued in his book Leviathan that, without government, life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
Explanation:
I double checked it.
The statement " according to Thomas Hobbes in the "state of nature" without government, there would not be peace." is false as Hobbes argued that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order, provide security, and prevent the state of nature from descending into anarchy.
Hobbes believed that without government, humans would live in a state of nature characterized by chaos, violence, and constant competition. In this state, people would act purely out of self-interest and would do whatever necessary to survive.
This view is often referred to as Hobbesian pessimism and is a central tenet of his political philosophy outlined in his work "Leviathan."
To know more about self-interest click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12972879#
#SPJ11
please help with this cuase iant doin allat
China was split throughout the 1920s when a fight for dominance between the CCP and KMT erupted.
What happened in China during that time?China had some industrialization throughout the 1930s, while suffering casualties as a result of battles between the CCP, the Nationalist government in Nanjing, remaining warlords, and the Empire of Japan after the Japanese invasion of Manchuria.
Conflict broke out over Asia much before World War Two officially started. Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931 in search of raw materials to supply its booming industries. A significant area of China had been occupied by Japan by 1937, and atrocities committed against Chinese people had become commonplace.
The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-45) was a battle that began when China launched a mass rebellion against the extension of Japanese control throughout its region (which had begun in 1931).
Japan had been expanding its influence in Manchuria for a while, and now the area was formally under its control. The Japanese also assaulted Shanghai in 1932 after successfully taking control of Manchuria.
The battle, also known as the War of Resistance against Japan in China, is also referred to as the Second Sino-Japanese War. A full-scale war between China and Japan lasted from 1937 until 1945, notwithstanding the assertions of some that the Manchurian incursion in 1931 was the catalyst for the conflict.
What occurred in India during those ten years?India launches its Non-Cooperation Movement in September 1920 under the direction of MK Gandhi. It results from the outrage that followed the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar, in which British-led soldiers shot and murdered over 400 residents who were unarmed while also hurting several more.
In order to protest British rule in India, Mohandas Gandhi organized the Salt March, which took place in India from March to April of that year. The march, which was attended by thousands of Indians, traveled 240 kilometers from Gandhi's spiritual retreat in Ahmedabad to the Arabian Sea beach.
Civil disobedience and the Salt Satyagraha from 1930 to 1931, the Quit India movement from about 1940 to 1942, and noncooperation from 1919 to 22 were the three primary initiatives that Gandhi oversaw and led. Other notable occurrences in this decade included the Chauri Chaura tragedy and the Khilafat Movement.
Learn more about Non-Cooperation Movement: https://brainly.com/question/26612251
#SPJ1
Heat and pressure drive water out of the rock.
[ Choose ]
Magma rises towards the surface.
First
The tectonic plate subducts.
[ Choose ]
The water lowers the melting temperature of the mantle.
[ Choose ]
Volcanoes form on the plate that does not subduct.
Heat and pressure drive the water out of rock and volcanoes form on the plate that does not subduct.
What are volcanoes?Volcanoes are geological formations that occur when molten rock, ash, and gas escape from the Earth's mantle or crust through an opening in the Earth's surface called a vent. This eruption can range from a steady flow of lava to violent explosions that can release ash, gas, and rock fragments into the atmosphere. Volcanoes can be found both on land and under the ocean, and they are often associated with tectonic plate boundaries where one plate is subducting under another. They play a critical role in shaping the Earth's landscape and are responsible for creating new land, such as islands and mountain ranges. While many volcanoes are dormant or extinct, some remain active and pose a significant threat to human life and property. Volcanic eruptions can cause a range of hazards, including lava flows, pyroclastic flows, ashfall, and volcanic gases, which can have far-reaching impacts on the environment and global climate.
To learn more about mountain, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30200758
#SPJ1
What statement best completes the diagram enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe and the second continental congress ratified the declaration of independence?
Based on the information, we can infer that the diagram is completed with the option about Thomas Paine's pamphlet to reclaim their natural rights (option A).
How to identify the sentence that correctly completes the diagram?To identify the sentence that completes the diagram, we must take into account that this diagram has sentences about the independence of the United States in a chronological order. According to the above, the first statement is a cause of the second statement, and the second statement is a cause of the third statement.
From the above, we can infer that the most accurate statement for this context would be:
Enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe.The pamphlet written by Thomas Paine to reclaim their natural rights.The Second Continental Congress ratifies the Declaration of Independence.These three declarations are related chronologically to the independence of the United States as facts related in cause and effect.
Note: This question is incomplete. Here is the complete information:
A. An early draft of Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence
circulates widely through colonial newspapers.
B. A popular pamphlet written by Thomas Paine calls for Americans
to reclaim their natural rights.
C. Several American lawyers bring a well-publicized lawsuit against
Britain for denying their inalienable rights.
D. Colonists propose that King George III sign a social contract
limiting his influence in the colonies.
Learn more about Thomas Paine in: https://brainly.com/question/5953344
#SPJ1
after world war i, senators in the united states objected to foreign policy decisions being made by international organizations rather than u.s. leaders. this led to –
After World War I, many senators in the United States objected to foreign policy decisions being made by international organizations instead of U.S. leaders.
This led to a policy of isolationism, where the U.S. government focused on domestic issues and avoided involvement in foreign conflicts. After World War I, senators in the United States objected to foreign policy decisions being made by international organizations rather than U.S. leaders. This led to the United States rejecting membership in the League of Nations and adopting a more isolationist foreign policy approach.
Isolationism became a prominent feature of U.S. foreign policy until World War II, when the country was forced to engage with the international community in order to defeat the Axis powers.
Learn more about World War I here:https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ11
Explain the statmemt in hindu raj after british raj would be even wores
Following the arrival of the British, many changes occurred in Indian society. Though the British and Hindu Raj were adverse, the conditions would also have been poor.
The subcontinent was divided into two separate nation nations in 1947 Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan when the British finally left India after 300 years. Millions of Muslims immediately set out on one of the largest migrations in human history, making their way to West and East Pakistan.
There would still be a climate of distrust among the communities even if there had not been a division. It wouldn't have been a perfect world where everyone gets along. Few Muslims would have attended the assembly if partition had not occurred and India had remained one. Additionally, the Kashmir conflict and the current struggle between India and Pakistan over Kashmir may not have arisen.
Read more about British on:
https://brainly.com/question/28734617
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
explain the statement hindu raj after british raj would be even worse. What could have been the plight of Muslim if lndia had not been divided?
i need help with this
Answer: 1 Fidel Castro takes over Cuba 2 The Soviet Union Helps Cuba build up its military 3 The United States helps lauch The Bay of pigs Invaision 4 A wave Migration from Cuba to the United States begins
Explanation:
Gisela lives in a country where all the means of production are controlled by
the government. She publicly writes and speaks about this type of system
hurting more people than it helps. Gisela is acting as
O A. a laborer
O B. an advocate
OC. a capitalist
D. a communist
【The First Opium War,】also known as the Opium War or the Anglo-Chinese War, was a series of military engagements fought between Britain and the Qing dynasty of China. The immediate issue was China's official seizure of opium stocks at Canton to stop the banned opium trade, and threatening the death penalty for future offenders. The British government insisted on the principles of free trade, equal diplomatic recognition among nations, and backed the merchants' demands. The British navy defeated the Chinese using technologically superior ships and weapons, and the British then imposed a treaty that granted territory to Britain and opened trade with China.
In the 18th century the demand for Chinese luxury goods (particularly silk, porcelain, and tea) created a trade imbalance between China and Britain. European silver flowed into China through the Canton System, which confined incoming foreign trade to the southern port city of Canton. To counter this imbalance, the British East India Company began to grow opium in Bengal and allowed private British merchants to sell opium to Chinese smugglers for illegal sale in China. The influx of narcotics reversed the Chinese trade surplus, drained the economy of silver, and increased the numbers of opium addicts inside the country, outcomes that seriously worried Chinese officials
The immediate issue that led to the First Opium War between Britain and China was China's official seizure of opium stocks at Canton to stop the banned opium trade.
China's policy of prohibiting the import and sale of opium was a response to the negative social and economic impacts that the drug was having on the country. However, the British East India Company, which had a monopoly on the opium trade, saw this policy as a threat to their profits and insisted on the principle of free trade.
The British government backed the company's demands, and the British navy was dispatched to the Chinese ports to protect British interests and enforce the right to trade. The Chinese government, faced with a technologically superior British navy, was ultimately defeated in the war, leading to the signing of the Treaty of Nanking, which granted Britain access to Chinese ports and opened up the country to trade with the West.
Learn more about First Opium War
https://brainly.com/question/12716043
#SPJ4
Full Question: What was the immediate issue that led to the First Opium War between Britain and China?
What complaint did southerners make about william lloyd garrison in connection with nat turner
Southerners complained that William Lloyd Garrison, an abolitionist, contributed to the radicalization of slaves through his anti-slavery newspaper, The Liberator, which they believed incited events like Nat Turner's rebellion.
William Lloyd Garrison was a prominent abolitionist and editor of the anti-slavery newspaper, The Liberator. He was a fierce opponent of slavery and believed in the immediate and complete abolition of the institution. His views and activism made him a controversial figure, particularly in the southern states.
In connection with the Nat Turner rebellion in 1831, southerners accused Garrison of promoting and inciting slave insurrections through his writings and speeches. Nat Turner was a slave who led a rebellion in Virginia, killing several white people before being captured and executed.
Many Southerners believed that Garrison's anti-slavery rhetoric and calls for immediate emancipation inspired Turner and other slaves to rebel against their masters.
Garrison vehemently denied these accusations and condemned the use of violence in the struggle against slavery. He argued that slavery was a moral abomination and that it was the duty of all Americans to work towards its abolition. He also believed in the power of peaceful resistance and civil disobedience to effect social change.
Despite his commitment to non-violence, Garrison's advocacy for the abolition of slavery and his uncompromising stance against it made him a target of Southern ire. He received death threats and was often the subject of violence and harassment.
However, his steadfast commitment to the cause of freedom and justice inspired a generation of abolitionists and helped to lay the groundwork for the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
To know more about William Lloyd Garrison refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31118087#
#SPJ11
