If 6 newborn babies are randomly selected, how many different gender sequences are possible?

Answer:

The amount of heat lost by the aluminum is 31,500 J

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

mass of aluminum, m =  500 g

initial temperature of the aluminum, θ₁ = 100° C

final temperature of the aluminum, θ₂ = 30°C

specific heat capacity of water, C = 4.18 J/g °C

specific heat capacity of aluminum , C = 0.90 J/g

Heat lost by the aluminum is equal to heat gained by the water.

The amount of heat lost by the aluminum, is calculated as;

Q = MCΔθ

Q = 500 x 0.9 (100 - 30)

Q = 500 x 0.9 x 70

Q = 31,500 J

Therefore, the amount of heat lost by the aluminum is 31,500 J

Answer:

14.69% probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 28, \sigma = 7.6[/tex]

What is the probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 20. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{20 - 28}{7.6}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.05[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.05[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.1469

14.69% probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

Answer:

2044

Step-by-step explanation:

just follow the story

a person uses a

hanger (2)

to pop a

ball  (0)

then flies

two kites (44)

Answer:

1). 2044

Step-by-step explanation:

The story includes: a hanger, a ball, and two kites (in that order)

From the information given, a hanger is 2, a ball is 0, and a kite is 4.

So it would be 2044.

Answer: 95 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

We can infer than angles 1, 4, 5, 8 are all equal and angles 2, 3, 6, 7 are also equal to eachother. These two sets of angles are supplementary(you’d get 180 by adding them)

So 3x+10=4x-15

if you rearrange you'll get

x=25

therefore angle 1 equals

3*25+10=85

angle 1 and 7 are supplementary

thus angle 7 equals

180-85=95

Answer:

28.45.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 x 5.69

Answer:

  $3.75

Step-by-step explanation:

I = Prt

I = $500·0.03·(3/12) = $3.75

The early-withdrawal fee is $3.75 for the first quarter.

_____

Each quarter after that, the principal amount will be larger, so the interest penalty will be larger. The fee would be the amount of interest that would be credited at the end of the next quarter, or at the end of the quarter currently in progress.

Tell me if it is right

Answer:

213, 123

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Thus; the slope is positive

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

the sample size = 20

for the slope; the degree of freedom df = n - 2

= 20 -2

= 18

Using ∝ = 0.05

From t -table , one tailed, at df =18)

[tex]t_{\alpha , df}}= t_{0.05, df = 18} = 1.734[/tex]

Thus the t- critical for the right tailed test is 1.734. This simply refers to the fact that the critical region is test statistics.

Incorporating the Excel Formula [ T.INV (1 - 0.05).18) = 1.734063607

≅ 1.734

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it would have less weight to carry

Answer:

9.52% probability of getting both candies green

Step-by-step explanation:

A probability is the number of desired outcomes divided by the number of total outcomes.

The order in which the candies are selected is not important. They are also selected without replacement. So we use the combinations formula to solve this question.

Combinations formula:

[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

Find the probability of getting both candies green

Desired outcomes:

2 green, from a set of 5. So

[tex]D = C_{5,2} = \frac{5!}{2!3!} = 10[/tex]

Total outcomes:

2 from a set of 4+5+6 = 15. So

[tex]T = C_{15,2} = \frac{15!}{2!13!} = 105[/tex]

Probability:

[tex]p = \frac{D}{T} = \frac{10}{105} = 0.0952[/tex]

9.52% probability of getting both candies green

Answer is 5 calories/min

75 divided by 15 is 5

Answer:five cal per min.15 in five groups equals ''75''

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We will first translate the situation to propositional logic. First, some notation is needed: [tex]\lor[/tex] is the or logical operation and [tex]\implies[/tex] is the symbol for logical implication. Define the following events:

J: Jose took the jewelry. L: Mrs Krasov lied, C: a crime was committed. T: Mr Krasov  was in town.

We will symbol the propositions in logical symbols. Recall that [tex]\neg[/tex] means negation

If Jose took the jewelry or Mrs. Krasov lied, then a crime was committed: [tex]J\lor L \implies C[/tex]

Mr. Krasov was not in town: [tex]\neg T[/tex]

If a crime was committed, then Mr. Krasov was in town: [tex]C\implies T[/tex]

We want to check if the conclusion Jose did not take the jewerly: [tex]\neg J[/tex] can be deduced from the premises.

First, recall the following:

- if [tex] a\implies b[/tex] and a is true, then b is true.

- [tex] a\implies b[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\neg b \implies a[/tex]

Coming back to the problem, we have the following premises

[tex]J\lor L \implies C, \neg T, \neg T \implies \neg C, \neg C \implies \neg(J\lor L)[/tex]

where the equivalence for the logical implication was applied. REcall that the negation of an or  statement is g iven by

[tex] \neg( a \lor b ) = \neg a \land \neg b [/tex] where [tex] \land[/tex] is the and logical operator.

USing this, we get the premises

[tex]J\lor L \implies C, \neg T, \neg T \implies \neg C, \neg C \implies \neg J\land \neg L[/tex]

Since [tex]\neg T[/tex], by having [tex]\neg T \implies \neg C[/tex], then it must be true that [tex]\neg C[/tex]. Since [tex]\neg C \implies \neg J\land \neg L[/tex], then it must be true that [tex] \neg J\land \neg L[/tex]. This final conclusion implies that it is true that [tex]\neg J[/tex] which is the statement that Jose did not take the jewelry.

Answer: LIKLEY

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula : Probability [tex]=\dfrac{\text{Number of favorable outcomes}}{\text{Total outcomes}}[/tex]

A standard cube has six numbers on it (1,2,3,4,5 and 6).

P( NOT 6) =[tex]\dfrac{\text{Numbers that are not 6}}{\text{Total numbers}}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{5}{6}=0.8333[/tex]

We know that when the probability of any event lies between 0.5 and 1then the event is said to be likely to happen.

Since , P(not 6)=0.8333 which lies between 0 and 0.5.

That means, it is likely to happen.

Note :

When probability of having A = 0 , we call A as uncertain event.

When probability of having A = 1 , we call A as certain event.

When probability of having A = 0.5 , we call A as equally likely event.

When probability of having A lies between 0 and 0.5 , we call A as unlikely event.

When probability of having A lies between 0.5 and 1 , we call A as likely event.

Answer:

Classifications would include

Rational; Fraction; Can be turned into Decimal; Positive

Those would be classifications

Answer: rational number, 0.375

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Rectangle C is 14 cm longer than B

Step-by-step explanation:

Let  x be the length of Rectangle A. Rectangle B is ¹/₅ longer than A Block B,

Therefore the length of rectangle B is:

[tex]x+\frac{1}{5}x[/tex]

Rectangle C is ¹/₃ longer than B, therefore the length of rectangle c is:

[tex]x+\frac{1}{5}x+\frac{1}{3}(x+\frac{1}{5}x) =x+ \frac{1}{5}x+\frac{1}{3}x+\frac{1}{15}x=x+\frac{9}{15}x[/tex]

The total length of all three rectangles is 133 cm.

Length of rectangle A + Length of rectangle B + Length of rectangle C = 133 cm

[tex]x+x+\frac{1}{5}x +x+\frac{9}{15}x=133\\x+x+x+\frac{1}{5}x +\frac{9}{15}x=133\\3x+\frac{12}{15}x=133\\ 45x+12x=1995\\57x=1995\\x=35cm[/tex]

Therefore the length of rectangle A is 35 cm, the length of rectangle B is [tex]35+\frac{1}{5}*35=42\ cm[/tex] and the length of rectangle C is [tex]35+\frac{9}{15}*35=56\ cm[/tex]

Rectangle C is ¹/₃ longer than B, which is 14 cm (42\3) longer than B

Answer:

all real x

Step-by-step explanation:

-3(x-1) > -3x - 2​

Distribute

-3x +3> -3x -2

Add 3x to each side

-3x +3 +3x > -3x+3x - 2​

3 > -2

This is always true so the inequality is true for all x

Answer:

[tex] m =\frac{y_2 -y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

Where x for this case represent the time and y the height waist off ground.

We have one point that can be extracted from the graph on this case:

[tex] x_1 = 1, y_1= 3[/tex]

Bout for the other point we have:

[tex] x_2 = 5.3 , y_2 = 9.6[/tex]

Is important to notice that 9.6 is an estimation since we don't have the scale to identify the real value. so then if we replace we got:

[tex] m =\frac{9.6-3}{5.3-1}= 1.535[/tex]

And for this case we can conclude that this slope is positive and around 1.5 and 1.6. And that means if we increase the time in one unit then the height off waist off ground would increae about 1.5 to 1.6 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to calculate the slope we need to use the following formula:

[tex] m =\frac{y_2 -y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

Where x for this case represent the time and y the height waist off ground.

We have one point that can be extracted from the graph on this case:

[tex] x_1 = 1, y_1= 3[/tex]

Bout for the other point we have:

[tex] x_2 = 5.3 , y_2 = 9.6[/tex]

Is important to notice that 9.6 is an estimation since we don't have the scale to identify the real value. so then if we replace we got:

[tex] m =\frac{9.6-3}{5.3-1}= 1.535[/tex]

And for this case we can conclude that this slope is positive and around 1.5 and 1.6. And that means if we increase the time in one unit then the height off waist off ground would increae about 1.5 to 1.6 ft

Answer: it is b because 2.5 lbs = 40 oz. then i know that 40 is half of 80 then there is not way it is the 1000 pound choice

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y = 1/2x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope intercept form is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

When we count rise over run, we find that the slope is 1/2

y = 1/2x + b

The line intersects the y-axis at 4, so the y-intercept is 4.

y = 1/2x + 4

I hope this helps :))

Answer:

A. Schaid draws a white sock and a green sock. It did not talk about no green sock

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1) cpk < 1.33, therefore it is not capable

b) cpk = 1.33, therefore it is capable

c) cpk < 1.33, therefore it is not capable

2) Cpk can never be greater than the Cp, but can be equal to it

Step-by-step explanation:

Upper limit (USL) = 47 minutes and Lower limit (LSL) = 30 minutes

1)

a) mean (μ) = 37 minutes, standard deviation (σ) = 3 minutes

[tex]cpk=min(\frac{USL-\mu}{3\sigma}, \frac{\mu - LSL}{3\sigma})=min(\frac{47-37}{3*3},\frac{37-30}{3*3} )=min(1.11,0.78)=0.78[/tex]

[tex]cp=(\frac{USL-LSL}{6\sigma})=\frac{47-30}{6*3}=0.94[/tex]

cpk < 1.33, therefore it is not capable

b) mean (μ) = 38 minutes, standard deviation (σ) = 2 minutes

[tex]cpk=min(\frac{USL-\mu}{3\sigma}, \frac{\mu - LSL}{3\sigma})=min(\frac{47-38}{3*2},\frac{38-30}{3*2} )=min(1.5,1.33)=1.33[/tex]

[tex]cp=(\frac{USL-LSL}{6\sigma})=\frac{47-30}{6*2}=1.42[/tex]

cpk = 1.33, therefore it is capable

c) a) mean (μ) = 38.5 minutes, standard deviation (σ) = 2.9 minutes

[tex]cpk=min(\frac{USL-\mu}{3\sigma}, \frac{\mu - LSL}{3\sigma})=min(\frac{47-38.5}{3*2.9},\frac{38.5-30}{3*2.9} )=min(0.98,0.98)=0.98[/tex]

[tex]cp=(\frac{USL-LSL}{6\sigma})=\frac{47-30}{6*2.9}=0.98[/tex]

cpk < 1.33, therefore it is not capable

2) Cpk can never be greater than the Cp, but can be equal to it

Answer:

All the elements in the sample share a common characteristic. All of them read the magazine, so we may have a biased sample. And we also have the bias of the fact that only the volunteers will respond to this survey, so this is a biased sample.

This type of sample is usually called convenience sampling, where the elements in the sample are the most readily available (and what is most readily available for a magazine than its own readers?)

Then the type of sample is a convenience sample and a biased sample.

Answer:

y = 1/4x + (any number)

Step-by-step explanation:

m = -8/2 = -4, the equation shown is y = -4x + 8

perpendicular is  y = 1/4x + (any number), you didn't say where the line was perpendicular.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Rational numbers are the result of dividing two integers. Intergers cannot be fractions. So 1.5 is rational but 3/2 is not.

Five rational numbers: 1.5, 6, 24.7, 384, 404.4, 1,980

I'm always happy to help :)

Answer:

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to claim that there is a significant relationship between x and y.

P-value = 0.003.

Step-by-step explanation:

If we perform a regression analysis relating x and y, we get the best fitting line with equation:

[tex]y=15.82x+92.9[/tex]

and a correlation coefficient r:

[tex]r=0.693[/tex]

We have to test the hypothesis, where the alternative hypothesis claims that there is a relationship between these two variables, and the null hypothesis claiming there is no relationship (meaning that the correlation is not significantly different from 0).

This can be written as:

[tex]H_0: \rho=0\\\\H_a:\rho\neq0[/tex]

where ρ is the population correlation coefficient for x and y.

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample size is n=16.

The degrees of freedom are df=14.

[tex]df=n-2=16-2=14[/tex]

The test statistic can be calculated as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{r\sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}=\dfrac{0.693\sqrt{14}}{\sqrt{1-(0.693)^2}}=\dfrac{2.593}{0.721}=3.597[/tex]

For a test statistic t=2.05 and 14 degrees of freedom, the P-value is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>3.597)=0.003[/tex]

The P-value (0.003) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant enough.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to claim that there is a significant relationship between x and y.

Answer:

157.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Use PEMDAS! In this rule, it is stated that we should always add/subtract before multiplying/dividing. Also, whatever you do on one side of an equation, you do to another. Therefore, in order to get rid of the -2/5, add 2/5 so we can get rid of it. We also (according to the rule), have to add it to the other side in order to balance out. So add the 2/5 to 39. Then the other side is now 39.4. Now we have to get x by itself. Divide both sides by 1/4 (or multiply by 4 on both sides) in order to get x=157.6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between:

10 and 4: 1.492

10 and 20: 2.055

13 and 4: 2.577

13 and 20: 2.226

The R code:

#Convert your datafile into csv and make sure your row names are 10,13,4 and 20

data=read.csv(file.choose())

data

row.names(data)=c(10,13,4,20)

data

d=dist(data,method="euclidean")

d

fit=hclust(d,method="complete")

plot(fit)

groups=cutree(fit,k=2)

rect.hclust(fit,k=2,border="red")