Write down the 1st term in the sequence given by: T(n) = n² + 3

Answer:

13.53% probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period

Step-by-step explanation:

In a Poisson distribution, the probability that X represents the number of successes of a random variable is given by the following formula:

[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\mu}*\mu^{x}}{(x)!}[/tex]

In which

x is the number of sucesses

e = 2.71828 is the Euler number

[tex]\mu[/tex] is the mean in the given time interval.

They arrive at a rate of two every five minutes

This means that [tex]\mu = 2[/tex]

What is the probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period?

This is P(X = 0).

[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\mu}*\mu^{x}}{(x)!}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 0) = \frac{e^{-2}*2^{0}}{(0)!} = 0.1353[/tex]

13.53% probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period

Answer:

a) We can not estimate the probability.

b) Zero probability.

c) There is a probability between 95% and 99% that they have between 475 and 525 customers on a given day.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We can not said nothing because we only know the average of customers per day. We need to know the probability distribution of the amount of customers per day to answer this question.

b) Now that we know that the variance is 100, although we do not know the exact distribution of the values, we can use the empirical rules to estimate the probability of having at least 700 customers on a given day.

If the variance is 100, the standard deviation is √100=10.

Applying the empirical rule (68-95-99.7 rule), we know that there is probability 0.15% of having at least 500+3*10=530 customers per day (more than 3 deviations from the mean).

Then, we can conclude that the probability of having at least 700 customers per day is zero.

c) To estimate this probability, we have to calculate how many deviations from the mean this values represent:

[tex]\Delta_1=475-500=-25=2.5\sigma\\\\\Delta_2=525-500=25=2.5\sigma[/tex]

We have an interval that have a width of ±2.5 deviations from the mean.

For 2 deviations from the mean, it is expected to have 95% of the data.

For 3 deviations from the mean, it is expected to have 99.7% of the data.

Then, for the interval 475 to 525, we can estimate a probability between 95% and 99%.

Answer:

6 less than a number is equal to 1 and 4 tenths

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B. F(x) = 0.4x² - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

→The function F(x) has shifted downwards, meaning there has to be a 1 being subtracted.

→The function F(x) has grown wider, meaning there has to be a number of absolute value less than 1.

This means answer choice, "B," is correct.

Answer:

The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

→The function F(x) has shifted downwards, meaning there has to be a 1 being subtracted.

→The function F(x) has grown wider, meaning there has to be a number of absolute value less than 1.

This means answer choice, "B," is correct.

Answer:

4.50 is for two scoops and a normal cone. Upgrades on cone is $0.50 and any additional toppings are also $0.50

Answer:5 × t = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: 4.50 + 0.50 = 5

Step 2: We has 5t is 5 × t

Step 3: 5 × t = 6

Answer:

[tex]\$0.26[/tex] has to be paid more if the coupon is applied first

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: A grocery store has a discount of 13% off hand soap. At the same time the hand soap manufacturer has a coupon for $2.00 off.

To find: how much more would be paid if the coupon is applied first

Solution:

Let $ x denotes cost of hand soap

Case 1:

If the discount is given first,

cost of hand soap = [tex]x-\frac{13}{100} x=\$ \frac{87}{100}x[/tex]

If the coupon for $2.00 off is applied,

Final cost of the hand soap = [tex]\$\,(\frac{87}{100}x-2)[/tex]

Case 2:

If the coupon for $2.00 off is applied first,

cost of hand soap = [tex]\$(x-2)[/tex]

If the discount is given then,

final cost of the hand soap = [tex](x-2)-\frac{13}{100}(x-2)=\frac{87}{100}(x-2)[/tex] = [tex]\frac{87}{100}x-\frac{87}{50}[/tex]

Here,

[tex]\frac{87}{100}x-\frac{87}{50}-\frac{87}{100}x+2=\frac{13}{50}=\$0.26[/tex]

So, [tex]\$0.26[/tex] has to be paid more if the coupon is applied first.

Answer:

$0.26

Step-by-step explanation: I took the test

Answer:

There were 300 students

Step-by-step explanation:

Original * 30 = increase

Add the increase to get the new number

original + increase = 308

original + original*30% = 390

Factor out original number

original ( 1+30%) = 390

Change to decimal form

original ( 1+.30) = 390

original ( 1.30) = 390

Divide by 1.3

original = 390/1.3

             =300

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

divide vertical drop by horizontal drop

or vertical increase by horizontal increase

for example, in the graph when y increases by 1 x increases by 1

1/1=1 and thus the gradient is 1

the whole equation is y=x+3

Answer:

The slope = 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

If we count squares down for the top arrow then left to the point where the line cuts the horizontal axis we get 10 and 10.

So the slope = 10/10 = 1.

Answer:

a = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given P(x) = 2 x+4 a

          Q(x)=4 x - 2

          P( Q(4)) = 60

         P(4 (4) - 2) = 60

        P( 14 ) = 60

       2 (14) + 4 a = 60

        4 a + 28 = 60

Subtracting '28' on both sides , we get

       4 a +28 - 28 = 60 - 28

       4 a = 32

Dividing '4' on both sides , we get

        a = 8

A becuase i worked it out and i got that so im really confident

Answer:

slope = 3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

3x-2y=6

Get this equation in the form y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

Subtract 3x from each side

3x-3x-2y=-3x+6

-2y = -3x+6

Divide each side by -2

-2y/-2 = -3x/-2 +6/-2

y = 3/2x -3

The slope is 3/2 and the y intercept is -3

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

I got this answer by putting it in the form y=mx+b

Step 1: Subtract 3x from each side

-2y = -3x+6

Step 2: Divide each side by -2

y = 3/2x -3

The slope is 3/2 and the y intercept is -3 because m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

Answer:

[tex]x=-10[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{x}{2}=-5\\\mathrm{Multiply\:both\:sides\:by\:}2\\\frac{2x}{2}=2\left(-5\right)\\Simplify\\x=-10[/tex]

Answer:

For k = 1:

=NEGBINOMDIST(0, 1, 0.666) = 0.6660

For k = 2:

=NEGBINOMDIST(1, 1, 0.666) = 0.2224

For k = 3:

=NEGBINOMDIST(2, 1, 0.666) = 0.0743

For k = 4:

=NEGBINOMDIST(3, 1, 0.666) = 0.0248

For k = 5:

=NEGBINOMDIST(4, 1, 0.666) = 0.0083

For k = 6:

=NEGBINOMDIST(5, 1, 0.666) = 0.0028

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of obtaining a defective 10-year old widget is 66.6%

p = 66.6% = 0.666

The probability of obtaining a non-defective 10-year old widget is

q = 1 - 0.666 = 0.334

The random variable will be the number of items that must be tested before finding the first defective 10-year old widget.

The geometric distribution is given by

[tex]$P(X = k) = p \times q^{k - 1}$[/tex]

Solving manually:

For k = 1:

[tex]P(X = 1) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{1 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{0} = 0.666[/tex]

For k = 2:

[tex]P(X = 2) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{2 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{1} = 0.2224[/tex]

For k = 3:

[tex]P(X = 3) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{3 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{2} = 0.0743[/tex]

For k = 4:

[tex]P(X = 4) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{4 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{3} = 0.0248[/tex]

For k = 5:

[tex]P(X = 5) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{5 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{4} = 0.0083[/tex]

For k = 6:

[tex]P(X = 6) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{6 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{5} = 0.0028[/tex]

Using Excel function:

NEGBINOMDIST(number_f, number_s, probability_s)

Where

number_f = k - 1 failures

number_s = no. of successes

probability_s = the probability of success

For the geometric distribution, let number_s = 1

For k = 1:

=NEGBINOMDIST(0, 1, 0.666) = 0.6660

For k = 2:

=NEGBINOMDIST(1, 1, 0.666) = 0.2224

For k = 3:

=NEGBINOMDIST(2, 1, 0.666) = 0.0743

For k = 4:

=NEGBINOMDIST(3, 1, 0.666) = 0.0248

For k = 5:

=NEGBINOMDIST(4, 1, 0.666) = 0.0083

For k = 6:

=NEGBINOMDIST(5, 1, 0.666) = 0.0028

As you can notice solving manually and using Excel yields the same results.

Answer:

The probability that a selected consumer, given that is 70 years old, likes Crunchicles is 12.78%.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete:

Three hundred consumers were surveyed about a new brand of snack food, Crunchicles. Their age groups and preferences are given in the table.

                           18–24 25–34 35–55 55 and over Total

Liked Crunchicles   4       9       3 23                  39

Disliked Crunchicles 5        27      28 64              124

No Preference         7        27          10 93                 137

Total                        16        63      41 180            300

One consumer from the survey is selected at random. If the selected consumer is 70 years old, what is the probability that he/she likes crunchicles .

If the consumer is 70 years old is included in the category "55 and over" from this survey. There are 180 subjects in that category.

The number that likes Crunchicles and are 55 and over is 23.

If we calculate the probability as the relative frequency, we have:

[tex]P(\text{L }|\text{ 55+})=\dfrac{P(\text{L \& 55+})}{P(5\text{5+})}=\dfrac{23}{180}=0.1278[/tex]

L: Likes Crunchicles.

The probability that a selected consumer, given that is 70 years old, likes Crunchicles is 12.78%.

Answer:

320 x^6

Step-by-step explanation:

(5x^3)(4x)^3

5 x^3  * 4^3 * x*3

5x^3 *64x^3

320 x^6

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

= 5x^3  * 4^3 * x^3

= 5x^3 *64x^3

= 320x^6

Hope this helps!

Answer:

x = 2 is the solution of the given equation

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given equation

  [tex]\sqrt{x+6-4} = x[/tex]

squaring on both sides , we get

[tex](\sqrt{x+2})^{2} = x^{2}[/tex]

⇒ x + 2 = x²

⇒x² - x -2 =0

Step(ii):-

  Given x² - x -2 =0

⇒ x² - 2x + x - 2 =0

⇒ x ( x-2) + 1(x - 2) =0

⇒ (x + 1) ( x-2) =0

⇒ x = -1 and x =2

x = 2 is the solution of the given equation

Verification:-

[tex]\sqrt{x+6-4} = x[/tex]

Put x= 2

[tex]\sqrt{2+6-4} = 2[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{4} = 2[/tex]

 2 = 2

Answer:  The correct answer is:  " 2x² " .

________________________________

Step-by-step explanation:

________________________________

We are asked:  "What is the sum of:  "x + x² + 2" and "x² − 2 − x" ?

Since we are to find the "sum" ;

  →  We are to "add" these 2 (two) expressions together:

     →     (x + x² + 2) +  (x² − 2 − x) ;

Note:  Let us rewrite the above, by adding the number "1" as a coefficient to:  the values "x" ; and "x² " ;  since there is an "implied coefficient of "1" ;

            → {since:  "any value" ; multiplied by "1"; results in that exact same value.}.

            →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Rewrite as:

             →     1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us add the "coefficient" , "1" ; just before the expression:

             "(1x² − 2 − 1x)" ;  

         {since "any value", multiplied by "1" , equals that same value.}.

And rewrite the expression; as follows:

            →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  1(1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us consider the following part of the expression:

                     →  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

________________________________

Note the distributive property of multiplication:

   →  " a(b+c) = ab + ac " ;

and likewise:

   →  " a(b+c+d) = ab + ac + ad " .

________________________________

So; we have:

→  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

  = (+1 * 1x²)  +  (+1 *-2) + (+1*-1x) ;

  =       + 1x²    +    (-2)     +  (-1x) ;

  =       +1x²    −    2   −  1x  ;

  ↔    ( + 1x²  −  1x  −  2)

Now, bring down the "left-hand side of the expression:

1x + 1x² + 2 ;

and add the rest of the expression:

     →  1x  +  1x²  +  2  +   1x²  −  1x  −  2 ;

________________________________

Now, simplify by combining the "like terms" ; as follows:

   +1x² + 1x² = 2x²  ;

   +1x −  1x = 0 ;  

   + 2 −  2  = 0 ;

________________________________

The answer is: " 2x² " .

________________________________

Hope this is helpful to you!

   Best wishes!

________________________________

Answer:

The correct answer is:  " 2x² " .

________________________________

Step-by-step explanation:

________________________________

We are asked:  "What is the sum of:  "x + x² + 2" and "x² − 2 − x" ?

Since we are to find the "sum" ;

 →  We are to "add" these 2 (two) expressions together:

    →     (x + x² + 2) +  (x² − 2 − x) ;

Note:  Let us rewrite the above, by adding the number "1" as a coefficient to:  the values "x" ; and "x² " ;  since there is an "implied coefficient of "1" ;

           → {since:  "any value" ; multiplied by "1"; results in that exact same value.}.

           →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Rewrite as:

            →     1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us add the "coefficient" , "1" ; just before the expression:

            "(1x² − 2 − 1x)" ;  

        {since "any value", multiplied by "1" , equals that same value.}.

And rewrite the expression; as follows:

           →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  1(1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us consider the following part of the expression:

                    →  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

________________________________

Note the distributive property of multiplication:

  →  " a(b+c) = ab + ac " ;

and likewise:

  →  " a(b+c+d) = ab + ac + ad " .

________________________________

So; we have:

→  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

 = (+1 * 1x²)  +  (+1 *-2) + (+1*-1x) ;

 =       + 1x²    +    (-2)     +  (-1x) ;

 =       +1x²    −    2   −  1x  ;

 ↔    ( + 1x²  −  1x  −  2)

Now, bring down the "left-hand side of the expression:

1x + 1x² + 2 ;

and add the rest of the expression:

    →  1x  +  1x²  +  2  +   1x²  −  1x  −  2 ;

________________________________

Now, simplify by combining the "like terms" ; as follows:

  +1x² + 1x² = 2x²  ;

  +1x −  1x = 0 ;  

  + 2 −  2  = 0 ;

________________________________

The answer is: " 2x² " .

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think it’s -4

Step-by-step explanation:

-2 plus -2 is -4

since 2 plus 2 is 4

Hope this helps ;)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is because 2 plus 2 is 4

so -2 plus -2 is -4

hth!

Answer:

The number of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g is 61

Step-by-step explanation:

The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:

68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

In this problem, we have that:

Mean = 88g

Standard deviation = 1g

Percentage of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g

87 = 88-1

So 87 is one standard deviation below the mean.

89 = 88+1

So 89 is one standard deviation above the mean.

By the Empirical Rule, 68% of students are reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g.

Out of 90 students:

0.68*90 = 61.2

Rounding to the nearest whole number:

The number of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g is 61

Answer:

A.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the attached file

Answer:

  4u²

Step-by-step explanation:

  [tex]\dfrac{12u^3 + 48u^2v}{3u+12v}=\dfrac{12u^2(u+4v)}{3(u+4v)}=\boxed{4u^2}[/tex]

Common factors cancel from numerator and denominator. The one factor that might make the expression undefined is given as non-zero, so no additional restrictions apply.

Answer:

[tex] \bar X \sim N(\mu , \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}})[/tex]

And replacing:

[tex] \mu_{\bar X}= 5[/tex]

And the deviation:

[tex] \sigma_{\bar X}= \frac{0.283}{\sqrt{5}}= 0.126[/tex]

And the distribution is given:

[tex] \bar X \sim N(\mu= 0.08, \sigma= 0.126)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following info given :

[tex] \mu= 5. \sigma^2 =0.08[/tex]

And the deviation would be [tex] \sigma = \sqrt{0.08}= 0.283[/tex]

For this case we select a sample size of n = 5 and the distirbution for the sample mean would be:

[tex] \bar X \sim N(\mu , \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}})[/tex]

And replacing:

[tex] \mu_{\bar X}= 5[/tex]

And the deviation:

[tex] \sigma_{\bar X}= \frac{0.283}{\sqrt{5}}= 0.126[/tex]

And the distribution is given:

[tex] \bar X \sim N(\mu= 0.08, \sigma= 0.126)[/tex]

Answer:

Yes, Because every x-value corresponds to exactly one y-value.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have two equations for the circumference, one for each circle:

C = 2*pi*r

C' = 2*pi*r'

now, if we take the quotient of those two equations, the left side must still be equal to the left side, this means that:

C/C' = 2*pi*r/(2*pi*r') = r/r'

So we have the relation:

C/C' = r/r'

And this is obtained for the division property of equality.

IF A = B, then as both numbers are equal, if we divide both sides by the same thing, then the equality must remain true.

Then the correct option is A.

Answer:

P(greater than 1.25 minutes) = 0.8611 (Approx)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Waiting time = 0 - 9 minutes

Find:

Probability that selected passenger has a waiting time greater than 1.25 minutes.

Computation:

⇒ The probability that a randomly selected passenger has a waiting time greater than 1.25 minutes =

⇒  P(greater than 1.25 minutes) = [9-1.25] / 9

⇒ P(greater than 1.25 minutes) = [7.75] / 9

⇒ P(greater than 1.25 minutes) = 0.8611 (Approx)

Answer:

daddy wants some more dior

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$350

Step-by-step explanation:

Let d = price of dryer

Then d - 61 is the price of the washer.

The sum of the prices is $639.

d + d - 61 = 639

2d - 61 = 639

2d = 700

d = 350

The price of the dryer is $350

The probabilities are:

a. P(A) = 0.35

b. P(B|A) ≈ 0.349

c. P(A ∩ B) ≈ 0.122

d. P(A^c ∩ B) ≈ 0.228

e. P(B) = 0.35

f. P(A|B) = 0.349

g. A and B are independent.

Yes, it is reasonable to treat A and B as though they were independent because P(A) * P(B) = P(A ∩ B).

We have,

Given:

Total number of components (n) = 1000

Number of defective components (d) = 350

a.

P(A) is the probability that the first component drawn is defective:

P(A) = d/n = 350/1000 = 0.35

b.

P(B|A) is the probability that the second component drawn is defective given that the first component drawn is defective:

Since one defective component has already been drawn, the total number of components is now 999, and the number of defective components remaining is 349.

P(B|A) = Number of defective components remaining / Total number of components remaining = 349/999 ≈ 0.349

c.

P(A ∩ B) is the probability that both the first and second components drawn are defective:

P(A ∩ B) = P(A) * P(B|A) = 0.35 * 0.349 ≈ 0.122

d.

P([tex]A^c[/tex] ∩ B) is the probability that the first component drawn is not defective (complement of A) and the second component drawn is defective:

[tex]P(A^c)[/tex] is the probability that the first component drawn is not defective:

[tex]P(A^c)[/tex] = 1 - P(A) = 1 - 0.35 = 0.65

Since the first component drawn is not defective, the total number of components remaining is now 999, and the number of defective components remaining is still 350.

P([tex]A^c[/tex] ∩ B) = P([tex]A^c[/tex]) * P(B) = 0.65 * (350/999) ≈ 0.228

e.

P(B) is the probability that the second component drawn is defective:

P(B) = Number of defective components / Total number of components

= 350/1000

= 0.35

f.

P(A|B) is the probability that the first component drawn is defective given that the second component drawn is defective:

P(A|B) = P(A ∩ B) / P(B)

= (0.35 * 0.349) / 0.35

= 0.349

g.

To determine if A and B are independent, we need to compare

P(A) * P(B) with P(A ∩ B).

P(A) * P(B) = 0.35 * 0.35 = 0.1225

P(A ∩ B) = 0.122

Since P(A) * P(B) = P(A ∩ B), A and B are independent events.

It is reasonable to treat A and B as independent because the probability of A and the probability of B are not affected by each other.

The occurrence or non-occurrence of A does not impact the probability of B.

Thus,

The probabilities are:

a. P(A) = 0.35

b. P(B|A) ≈ 0.349

c. P(A ∩ B) ≈ 0.122

d. P(A^c ∩ B) ≈ 0.228

e. P(B) = 0.35

f. P(A|B) = 0.349

g. A and B are independent.

Yes, it is reasonable to treat A and B as though they were independent because P(A) * P(B) = P(A ∩ B).

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ4

Answer:

Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 \leq \mu_2[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]

The statistic is given by:

[tex]t= \frac{\bar X_1 -\bar X_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1} +\frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] t=\frac{72.86-67.34}{\sqrt{\frac{15.98^2}{150} +\frac{35.67^2}{275}}}=2.194[/tex]

And the best option would be:

2.19

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following info given:

n1 = 150 n2 = 275

[tex]\bar x_1 = 72.86, \bar x_2 = 67.34[/tex]

s1 = 15.98 s2 = 35.67

We want to test the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 \leq \mu_2[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]

The statistic is given by:

[tex]t= \frac{\bar X_1 -\bar X_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1} +\frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] t=\frac{72.86-67.34}{\sqrt{\frac{15.98^2}{150} +\frac{35.67^2}{275}}}=2.194[/tex]

And the best option would be:

2.19

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Measure of arcURN = 270°

In radians:

270° = 270π/180

270° = 3π/2

Now

Area of sector = 1/2r²∅

= 1/2(10)²(3π/2)

= 50(3π/2)

= 75π