What role did women play in Maya society?
Answer:
Women played an important role in rituals, cooking food to eat and to sacrifice. Whether women participated in said rituals is unknown. Women also worked on all of the textiles, an essential resource and product for Maya society.
How were the roles of Athens and Sparta in the Persian war alike and different?
Answer:
Both Athens and Sparta had an Assembly, whose members were elected by the people. Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by archons, who were elected annually.
Explanation:
please answer those blanks for me thank you so much
FRESH WATER:
CHINA’S ____________________________ RIVERS ARE BOTH LOCATED IN EASTERN CHINA.
PROVIDED ____________________________ LAND, RESOURCES, TRADE, TRAVEL FOR EXPANSION ____________________________)
1. two
2. water
3. fertile, separated
Nhich set of events from the Nullification Crisis is listed in correct chronological order?
A. 1. Congress passed higher tariffs.
2. South Carolina voted to nullify federal tariffs within its borders.
3. Force Bill threatened to use armed force.
4. South Carolina suspended its nullification.
OB. 1. South Carolina suspended its nullification.
2. Force Bill threatened to use armed force.
3. South Carolina voted to nullify federal tariffs within its borders.
4. Congress passed higher tariffs.
C. 1. South Carolina voted to nullify federal tariffs within its borders.
2. Congress passed higher tariffs.
3. South Carolina suspended its nullification.
4. Force Bill threatened to use armed force.
D. 1. Force Bill threatened to use armed force.
2. South Carolina suspended its nullification.
3. Congress passed higher tariffs.
4. South Carolina voted to nullify federal tariffs within its borders.
LOOK AT PICTURE
The events from A segment are listed in correct order. These are the events from nullification crisis. Thus, A is correct option.
What is Nullification Crisis?Nullification crisis is the conflict between the federal government and the state of South Carolina in 1832-1833, which arose from the latter's attempt to declare the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and illegal within state.
The constitutional theory that supported states right to void federal actions inside their borders, the nullification doctrine, was undermined in part by the federal government's successful resolution of the nullification crisis.
Therefore, we can conclude that A is the correct option.
Learn more about nullification crisis here:
https://brainly.com/question/29775369
#SPJ2
Why did settlement patterns in New England change from the seventeenth to the eighteenth century?
Explanation:
Population growth, natural increase b) Limited Availability of Land [smaller regions with hostile frontiers] c) Partible inheritance [Distributing Land among equally among male heirs] d) Shift from Land Grants to Sales (126-129)
mark me brainliest
6. Bartolomé de Las Casas describes the Spanish conquistadors as "Men who were empty of all pity, behaving like savage beasts." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? List 3 at least examples to support your answer.
Answer:
The statement by Bartolome de las Casas is true.
Explanation:
The Spanish conquistadors were explorers and knights who assisted in conquering the New World and establishing colonies. The Spanish conquistadors conquered Central and South America after the discovery of the New World. The conquistadors were successful in colonizing Central America through invading ancient Civilizations. They were without remorse or pity towards the Natives. They killed thousands of people to acquire wealth and land. Their behaviour was considered to be ruthless.
The statement asserted by Bartolome de las Casas that "the Spanish conquistador were men who were empty of all pity, behaving like savage beasts" is true.
Who are the Spanish conquistadors?The Spanish conquistadors were explorers and knights who assisted in conquering the New World and establishing colonies.
The Spanish conquistadors conquered the Central and South America after the discovery of the New World.
The Spanish conquistadors were successful in colonizing Central America through invading ancient Civilizations.
During their quest, they were without remorse nor pity towards the Natives, they killed thousands of people in order to acquire wealth and land.
Hence, the statement asserted by Bartolome de las Casas that "the Spanish conquistador were men who were empty of all pity, behaving like savage beasts" is true.
Read more about Spanish conquistador
brainly.com/question/8807794
What determined that the President can only serve two terms?
Answer:
The 22nd amendment
Explanation:
What did Hitler learn from the response of other countries and the League of Nations which helped him in the future?
Answer:
Hitler revealed that Germany had begun to construct an air force, and unveiled plans to reinstitute conscription and create a German army of more than half a million men. Britain, France, Italy, and the League of Nations all issued statements condemning Hitler's decision, but did little else to penalize Germany.
AWARDING BRAINLIEST AND POINTS
Explain the difference between the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Answer:The Civil Rights Act that passed Congress in July 1964 did ban segregation in public accommodations. ... 6, 1965, the Voting Rights Act banned literacy tests and other barriers to Black voting.
Tell me some facts about the Saleh Witch Trials
will give brainlist <3
Answer:
Explanation:
150 men and women were imprisoned because they were accused of witchcraft. 19 men and women were hanged, 1 man was crushed and 7 people died in prison. The place in Salem where the 'witches' were hanged became known as Gallows Hill.
Who was a victim of Boston Massacre
5 points
A. Thomas Paine
B. Crispus Attucks
C. John Hancock
D. Samuel Adams
Answer:
a freed black slave Crispus Attucks
Why did Roman army experience decline in discipline?
Answer:
Inflation-Disappearance of money. Decline of loyalty and discipline in military-Roman soldiers became less disciplines and loyal because they gave their loyalty to christianity, and non-violence. Citizen indifference and loss of patriotism-Rome relied on foreign men to fight in the army.
Explanation:
Answer:ima hook it up
Explanation:
Title A nation divided:north vs. south .Based on the information in the text, what do you think was the ultimate reason the South lost to the North? what was their greatest weakness? be sure to use complete sentences when responding.
Answer:
I think the reason the south lost is because the north had more resources.
the north had better transportation and the north had more gun distributors.
The north made more bullets, guns, and railways.
Explanation:
a country split between the north and the south believe to be the main cause of the South's defeat by the North, based on the information in the text, is that the North had greater resources.
The north also had more distributors of guns and better transportation. More railroads, firearms, and ammunition were produced in the north.
What is meant by greatest weakness?Your initial reaction could be to choose a strength that is essential to the position you are seeking for if you were asked about your biggest strength during a job interview.
This reaction would be accurate. You'll naturally want to respond in the opposite way to questions concerning your flaws. Choose a flaw that, while genuine, does not play a significant role in the position for which you are interviewing. Nobody wants to work for an accountant who ignores the small print or a salesperson who gets anxious when making cold calls.
Learn more about greatest weakness, from :
brainly.com/question/30156111
#SPJ2
How were African Americans treated after the revolutionary war in the north and south?
(please help)
Answer:
Many were put back into slavery. Slavery is restricted freedom so I would say some were stil treated unfairly.
Explanation:
Answer:
Many slave owners were allowed to enlist in the war with the promise of their freedom, yet were put back into slavery after the war. In many Northern states, slavery was seen as a right to hold people as property and extremely unjust. The North's economy also did not require slaves, since it was dependent on manufacturing. The South's economy needed slaves. It would be impossible to run a plantation effectively and affordably without the manpower that slaves provided.
In sum, slaves in the North were treated well and with kindness. However, in the South, slaves were disrespected and forced with arduous labor.
PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST
Why were there revolutionary disturbances in Russia in 1905 what were the demands of the revolutionaries
Answer:
The 1905 revolution was spurred by the Russian defeat in the Russo-Japanese War, which ended in the same year, but also by the growing realization by a variety of sectors of society of the need for reform. Politicians such as Sergei Witte had failed to accomplish this.
Explanation:
What number president was Andrew Jackson?
Answer:
the answer is 7 napindot ko kasi yung united states na basta dko alam basta alam ko napindot ko yon kaya
How did religion influence ancient Indian art?
Answer:
characterized by enormous material wealth or by elaborate trade activity.
It was defined by creativity. Flourishing arts, fabulous literature, and stupendous scholars are just a few of the things that marked the period.
In 185 B.C.E., the Mauryan empire collapsed when the last of the Mauryan kings was assassinated. In its place, small kingdoms arose throughout India.
For nearly 500 years, the various states warred with each other. In the northern territories, a new empire arose when a ruler named Chandragupta I ascended the throne in 320 C.E. He revived many principles of Mauryan government and paved the way for his son, Samudragupta, to develop an extensive empire.
Explanation:
What were the political and social consequences of the Protestant Reformation? How did Martin Luther react to these political and social phenomena?
When European settlers came to North America, they brought their European seeds with them. When Africans were brought to North America as slaves, they brought African food with them. Based on this information, what can you infer? It is difficult to transport food across the oceans. People are attached to the food from their home. Early settlers and immigrants did not like American food. People are not attached to the food from their home.
When Africans were brought to America to be sold as slaves, they brought food from their home continent with them. These foods became incorporated in what would become known as Southern food.
Answer:
"People are attached to the food from their home. Early settlers and immigrants did not like American food. People are not attached to the food from their home." that, I guess, is the answer.
Explanation:
See above.
Which of these was not an outcome of the Treaty of Paris?
I NEED HELP NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW PLEASEEEEEE
Answer:
there are three different treaty of paris which year did it happen? what are your answer choices?
Explanation:
What was the United States reaction to the start of World War I in Europe?
Answer: On August 4, as World War I erupted across Europe, President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed America's neutrality, stating the nation “must be neutral in fact as well as in name during these days that are to try men's souls.” With no vital interests at stake, many Americans supported this position.
Explanation:
Which is NOT a qualification of a US senator?
A
must be 25 years of age
B
must be 30 years of age
С
must be a citizen of the US for at least 9 years
D
must live in state in which they are running
four characteristics of Populism.
Answer:
Four including its defensive characteristics of "populism" that I have included in my essay are; the perplexity that may emerge while grappling with populism, the growing discrepancy of populist political methodologies and the financial characteristics of classical populism that have been called upon to answer the winning overall concepts, the elementary highlights of majority rule government may obviously alter, and we contend within these political parties, as with any other subjective party.
What caused the Seven years' war? And, how did it end?
I give Brainliest!
Answer:
he Seven Years War, a global conflict known in America as the French and Indian War, officially begins when England declares war on France. However, fighting and skirmishes between England and France had been going on in North America for years.
In the early 1750s, French expansion into the Ohio River valley repeatedly brought France into armed conflict with the British colonies. In 1756–the first official year of fighting in the Seven Years War–the British suffered a series of defeats against the French and their broad network of Native American alliances. However, in 1757, British Prime Minister William Pitt (the older) recognized the potential of imperial expansion that would come out of victory against the French and borrowed heavily to fund an expanded war effort. Pitt financed Prussia’s struggle against France and her allies in Europe and reimbursed the colonies for the raising of armies in North America.
By 1760, the French had been expelled from Canada, and by 1763 all of France’s allies in Europe had either made a separate peace with Prussia or had been defeated. In addition, Spanish attempts to aid France in the Americas had failed, and France also suffered defeats against British forces in India.
The Seven Years War ended with the signing of the treaties of Hubertusburg and Paris in February 1763. In the Treaty of Paris, France lost all claims to Canada and gave Louisiana to Spain, while Britain received Spanish Florida, Upper Canada, and various French holdings overseas. The treaty ensured the colonial and maritime supremacy of Britain and strengthened the 13 American colonies by removing their European rivals to the north and the south. Fifteen years later, French bitterness over the loss of most of their colonial empire contributed to their intervention in the American Revolution on the side of the Patriots.
Explanation:
Read the entire passage . Please
How do think Texas will play a role in the expansion of the United States? How could the new Republic become a source of conflict between the United States and Mexico?
Natasha wants to know whether adding coffee to the soil will help plants grow. She plants seeds in pots and adds coffee to the soil. What else should Natasha do to find out if coffee helps plants grow? A give the plants fertilizer B. add more water to the soil C. put the plants in the shade D. grow some seeds without coffee
Answer:
D
Explanation:
This will let her knows the deference between plant with coffee and plant without coffee and from this she will know if coffee helps plants grow or not
What evidence would you use to support the idea that Georgia Gilmore's cooking changed
lives?
.it funding by movement rights civil the helped It
What were TWO new aspects of Renaissance art, compared to medieval
art?
Answer:
Medieval and Renaissance are two different periods in the world history between which we can see an enormous difference in art, music, fashion, architecture, etc. Of these, the most vibrant and distinguishing feature was art.
Explanation:
In the space below, describe the type of governments that Federalists and Anti-Federalists preferred?
Answer: Hello , I normally don't answer these because it is to hard to get the answer straight from memorie so do not get mad if it is from another site.
Anti-Federalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
For the faction opposed to the policies of U.S. President George Washington, see the Anti-Administration party.
The Articles of Confederation, the predecessor to the U.S. Constitution and drafted from Anti-Federalist principles
Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.
Contents
Major points
They believed the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights.
They believed the Constitution created a presidency so powerful that it would become a monarchy.
They believed the Constitution did too little with the courts and would create an out-of-control judiciary.
They believed that the national government would be too far away from the people and thus unresponsive to the needs of localities.
They believed the Constitution would abrogate, at least in part, the power of the states.[1]
History
During the American Revolution and its immediate aftermath, the term federal was applied to any person who supported the colonial union and the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. After the war, the group that felt the national government under the Articles was too weak appropriated the name Federalist for themselves. Historian Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of 'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress."[2]
As the Federalists moved to amend the Articles, eventually leading to the Constitutional Convention, they applied the term anti-federalist to their opposition. The term implied, correctly or not, both opposition to Congress and unpatriotic motives. The Anti-Federalists rejected the term, arguing that they were the true Federalists. In both their correspondence and their local groups, they tried to capture the term. For example, an unknown anti-federalist signed his public correspondence as "A Federal Farmer" and the New York committee opposing the Constitution was called the "Federal Republican Committee." However, the Federalists carried the day and the name Anti-Federalists forever stuck.[2]
The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including those opposed to the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals; those that saw in the proposed government a new centralized, disguised "monarchic" power that would only replace the cast-off despotism of Great Britain;[3] and those who simply feared that the new government threatened their liberties. Some of the opposition believed that the central government under the Articles of Confederation was sufficient. Still, others believed that while the national government under the Articles was too weak, the national government under the Constitution would be too strong. Another complaint of the Anti-Federalists was that the Constitution provided for a centralized rather than federal government (and in The Federalist Papers, James Madison admits that the new Constitution has the characteristics of both a centralized and federal form of the government) and that a truly federal form of government was a leaguing of states as under the Articles of Confederation.
During the period of debate over the ratification of the Constitution, numerous independent local speeches and articles were published all across the country. Initially, many of the articles in opposition were written under pseudonyms, such as "Brutus" (likely Melancton Smith),[4] "Centinel" (likely Samuel Bryan), and "Federal Farmer." Eventually, famous revolutionary figures such as Patrick Henry came out publicly against the Constitution. They argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the president would become a king. They objected to the federal court system created by the proposed constitution. This produced a phenomenal body of political writing; the best and most influential of these articles and speeches were gathered by historians into a collection known as the Anti-Federalist Papers in allusion to the Federalist Papers.
How did ancient India influence religion in other parts of the world?
