The given statement is True because The Continental Divide is a ridge of mountains that separates the watersheds of the Pacific Ocean from those of the Atlantic Ocean and Arctic Ocean.
It acts as a natural barrier that forces water to flow either north or south until it reaches an ocean. The Continental Divide stretches through much of North America, beginning in the Yukon and Alaska, extending through Canada and the United States, and ending in Mexico.
Along the way, it passes through both the Rocky Mountains and the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The Continental Divide is important because it helps define the borders of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. It also determines which ocean water flows into and its role in the hydrologic cycle.
To know more about Continental Divide, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31090146
#SPJ4
In the 5th century b.c.e., which two forms of government alternated back and forth? ancient greece
Answer: In the 5th century BCE, the two forms of government that alternated back and forth in Ancient Greece were democracy and oligarchy.
What complaint did southerners make about william lloyd garrison in connection with nat turner
Southerners complained that William Lloyd Garrison, an abolitionist, contributed to the radicalization of slaves through his anti-slavery newspaper, The Liberator, which they believed incited events like Nat Turner's rebellion.
William Lloyd Garrison was a prominent abolitionist and editor of the anti-slavery newspaper, The Liberator. He was a fierce opponent of slavery and believed in the immediate and complete abolition of the institution. His views and activism made him a controversial figure, particularly in the southern states.
In connection with the Nat Turner rebellion in 1831, southerners accused Garrison of promoting and inciting slave insurrections through his writings and speeches. Nat Turner was a slave who led a rebellion in Virginia, killing several white people before being captured and executed.
Many Southerners believed that Garrison's anti-slavery rhetoric and calls for immediate emancipation inspired Turner and other slaves to rebel against their masters.
Garrison vehemently denied these accusations and condemned the use of violence in the struggle against slavery. He argued that slavery was a moral abomination and that it was the duty of all Americans to work towards its abolition. He also believed in the power of peaceful resistance and civil disobedience to effect social change.
Despite his commitment to non-violence, Garrison's advocacy for the abolition of slavery and his uncompromising stance against it made him a target of Southern ire. He received death threats and was often the subject of violence and harassment.
However, his steadfast commitment to the cause of freedom and justice inspired a generation of abolitionists and helped to lay the groundwork for the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
To know more about William Lloyd Garrison refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31118087#
#SPJ11
write 5-7 sentences minimum as to why this source supports the new deal.
The New Deal was a set of policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to Great Depression of 1930s.
What was the New Deal?The New Deal was a series of programs, policies, and reforms introduced by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression. The New Deal aimed to provide relief, recovery, and reform for the American people by creating jobs, stabilizing the banking system, regulating the stock market, and establishing social welfare programs. Some of the most significant New Deal programs included the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Works Progress Administration, and the Social Security Act. The New Deal helped to stimulate economic growth and provided support for millions of Americans during one of the most challenging times in US history.
To learn more about New Deal, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14027150
#SPJ1
Why did the settlers use boycotting as a means of protest against British acts?
1.The British thought boycotts were a foolish response.
2.The settlers had no organized government to send a formal protest.
3.Boycotts would have the most economic effect.
4.Boycotts were a way to stir more violence.
ANSWER ASAP IM IN THE MIDDLE OF A TEST
Answer:
3.Boycotts would have the most economic effect.
Explanation:
The settlers used boycotting as a means of protest against British acts because boycotting would have the most economic effect. By refusing to buy British goods, the colonists were able to hit the British where it hurt, in their pocketbooks. This made the boycotts an effective means of protest, as they put economic pressure on the British government to change its policies. The other options are not accurate: the British did not think boycotts were a foolish response (in fact, they took them very seriously), the colonists did have organized governments that sent formal protests, and boycotts were not a way to stir more violence, but rather a peaceful means of protest.How did the 18th Century Political Cartoons Reflect Tensions Between Colonists and Great Britain?
Political cartoons played a crucial role in the discussion of colonial concerns in the 18th century, when there was conflict between colonies and Great Britain.
In addition to highlighting society, fashion, and entertainment, the cartoons also addressed other facets of British political life, such as disputes with its colonies and other countries.
The colonists' mounting discontent with British laws like the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts, they perceived as unfair and harsh, was mirrored in the cartoons. The Boston Tea Party and a boycott of British products were two examples of the colonists' opposition to British rule that was also reflected in the cartoons.
As a result, the significance of the 18th Century Political Cartoons Reflect Tensions Between Colonists and Great Britain are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on colonies, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13673860
#SPJ1
How many air pollutants has the epa issued rulings on since the ammendments to the clean air act in 1990?.
The EPA has issued rulings on dozens of air pollutants since the amendments to the Clean Air Act in 1990.
The Clean Air Act is a federal law in the United States that regulates air emissions from various sources, including industrial plants, vehicles, and other sources. The law was first enacted in 1963 and has been amended several times, most recently in 1990. The amendments to the Clean Air Act in 1990 strengthened the law and gave the EPA more authority to regulate air pollution.
Since then, the EPA has issued rulings on many different air pollutants, including particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and many others. The agency has also established air quality standards for many of these pollutants, and it regularly monitors air quality across the country to ensure that these standards are being met.
To know more about air pollutants, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/31063542
#SPJ4
What are some reasons that Genghis Khan was not as influential as people think?
Answer:
HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF AS MANY AS 40 MILLION PEOPLE. lifetime, and scholars estimate that he may have killed a full three-fourths of modern-day Iran's population during his war with the Khwarezmid Empire. All told, the Mongols' attacks may have reduced the entire world population by as much as 11 percent.
What was Hitler's critique of the republic government? Why did he blame them?
No links
Need ASAP
Answer:
Adolf Hitler's critique of the Weimar Republic government in Germany was that it was weak, corrupt, and ineffective. He believed that the government was responsible for Germany's defeat in World War I and the economic hardships that followed, and he blamed the government for the Treaty of Versailles, which imposed harsh reparations and other penalties on Germany.
Why was King Philip II not successful in bringing England back to Catholicism when he married Mary Tudor?
King Philip II of Spain married Mary Tudor, the Queen of England, in 1554 with the aim of bringing England back to Catholicism. However, despite his efforts, he was not successful in his mission for a number of reasons.
Opposition from English Nobles: Many English nobles were opposed to the marriage, and feared that it would lead to a loss of English sovereignty to Spain. They also feared that Philip would try to impose Catholicism on the country, which was deeply unpopular with the majority of the English population.
Popular Resistance: Many ordinary English people were deeply committed to Protestantism, and were resistant to attempts to reintroduce Catholicism. This was especially true in the towns and cities, where Protestantism was strongest.
Mary's Death: Mary Tudor died in 1558, just four years after the marriage, and was succeeded by her half-sister Elizabeth I, who was a Protestant. Elizabeth reversed many of Mary's Catholic policies, and introduced a new Act of Supremacy which made her the head of the Church of England. This meant that even if Philip had succeeded in reintroducing Catholicism during Mary's reign, it would have been short-lived.
Political Instability: England was facing a period of political instability during the reign of Mary Tudor, with many Catholic and Protestant factions vying for power. This made it difficult for Philip to implement any lasting changes.
Overall, King Philip II's attempts to bring England back to Catholicism were thwarted by political, social, and religious factors that made it difficult for him to impose his will on the English people.
Summarize the argument that harriet and her husband make as to why they deserve to be free.
Harriet and her husband argue that they deserve to be free based on their natural rights as human beings, the immorality of slavery, and their potential contributions to society as free citizens.
In their argument, Harriet and her husband emphasize that, as human beings, they possess natural rights that should not be violated, including the right to liberty. They assert that slavery is an inherently immoral institution that denies them these fundamental rights.
By highlighting their skills, talents, and potential, they contend that they could contribute more effectively to society if allowed to live as free citizens. They also appeal to the compassion and empathy of their audience, sharing personal stories and experiences to illustrate the inhumanity and cruelty of slavery.
In essence, Harriet and her husband call for their freedom based on principles of justice, morality, and the potential for a better future for themselves and their community.
To know more about morality click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1420034#
#SPJ11
How was the removal of the kulaks representative of the kind of government stalin was seeking to create?
The removal of the kulaks, or wealthy peasants, was representative of the kind of government Stalin was seeking to create in the Soviet Union. Stalin's government aimed to eliminate all forms of opposition to the Soviet state and consolidate power under his rule.
The kulaks were seen as a threat to this goal because they had the resources and influence to challenge the government's authority. Stalin used violent and repressive measures to remove the kulaks, including confiscating their property and exiling them to remote areas.
This allowed Stalin to strengthen his grip on the Soviet Union and ensure that the Communist Party remained in control. Ultimately, the removal of the kulaks represented Stalin's desire for absolute power and his willingness to use any means necessary to achieve it.
To know more about Soviet Union, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/10173240#
#SPJ11
How can a speech or public statement resonate differently with various audiences, depending upon their point of view?
A speech or public statement can resonate differently with various audiences depending on their point of view due to factors like cultural background, personal beliefs, and emotional connection.
The speaker's message may be interpreted differently based on the audience's prior experiences and knowledge. Additionally, the use of language, tone, and rhetoric can impact how well the message is received. Some individuals might feel inspired, while others may feel indifferent or even offended by the same speech.
To effectively communicate with diverse audiences, it's essential for the speaker to consider these factors and adapt their message accordingly, aiming for inclusivity and empathy to maximize resonance with different listeners.
To know more about cultural background visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11079603
#SPJ11
How did the invention of machine guns influence European states in the 19th
century?
OA. It led them to devote nearly all their resources to producing
weapons.
OB. It convinced them to avoid war, as military conflict became
deadlier than ever.
OC. It allowed them to more easily conquer and control colonies in
Africa and Asia.
OD. It helped nationalist groups win their independence from large
empires.
Answer:C
Explanation: A is wrong 'cause European nations on 19th century Generally uses most of the resources for Buildin manufactories and Trade ships
B is wrong 'cause europe always in war and machine guns didn't change it
D is wrong because basicly the empires ? itself have the machine guns to
What presidents (Current Era) dealt with Immigration Right Movement?
Answer:
Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation:
i think may be wrong tho
20. Which quality of the Hudson River School art is displayed in this painting? (1 point)
A. A portrayal of man's relationship with nature
B. A portrayal of vivid landscapes in the Northeast
C. A portrayal of industrialization's effect on nature
D. A portrayal of the European influence on American artists
A portrayal of man's relationship with nature quality of the Hudson River School art is displayed in this painting. So the option A is correct.
The Hudson River School was a nineteenth-century American art trend. It was distinguished by its Romantic emphasis on the natural world and its adoration of the American environment.
This painting of a Native American guy in the middle of a lush, tranquil setting is a prime example of the artwork produced by this school. The landscape and the guy look to be at peace with one another, demonstrating the man's harmony with the natural world.
The image exudes reverence for nature and suggests a strong bond between people and the natural world. The painting also conveys the message that nature should be cherished and valued and that man is a part of it. So the option A is correct.
To learn more about Hudson River link is here
brainly.com/question/29836492
#SPJ4
Why was it argued that Imperialism would help get America out of this time of crisis?
Answer: because it would give the US an outlet to market overproduced goods in foreign countries.
What is the point of including the childhood prayer in the introduction
Answer:
Explanation:
Without more context, it is difficult to know exactly which childhood prayer is being referred to and in what context it is being included in the introduction. However, in general, the point of including a childhood prayer in an introduction could be to provide a personal or emotional connection with the reader or audience. Depending on the nature of the prayer, it could also be used to establish a particular tone or theme for the piece of writing or speech.
For example, if the prayer is one that emphasizes humility, compassion, or gratitude, including it in the introduction could signal to the reader or audience that these values are important to the writer or speaker and will be central to the message they are trying to convey. Alternatively, if the prayer is one that evokes a sense of comfort or familiarity, including it in the introduction could help to create a sense of intimacy or trust between the writer or speaker and the reader or audience.
Ultimately, the point of including a childhood prayer in an introduction will depend on the specific context and purpose of the piece of writing or speech.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
What claims does President Truman make about why the aid to Greece is necessary
President Truman claims that aid to Greece is necessary because the country is facing a communist insurgency that threatens to overthrow its democratic government.
In his speech to Congress on March 12, 1947, Truman argued that the United States had a moral obligation to support Greece and other nations facing similar threats to their freedom and independence. He also emphasized the strategic importance of Greece as a bulwark against Soviet expansion in the Eastern Mediterranean.
By providing economic and military aid to Greece, Truman hoped to strengthen its ability to resist communist subversion and maintain stability in the region.
Ultimately, Truman's policy of containment aimed to contain Soviet influence and prevent the spread of communism around the world.
To know more about democratic government click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/2849514#
#SPJ11
Japan built thousands of miles of railroad and factories. They began building warships and had over 500,000 well-trained, well-armed soldiers. Both of which are examples of?
Socialism & Critical Theory
Democracy & Libertarianism
Socialism & Diplomacy
Industrialization & Empire Building
The examples of Japan building thousands of miles of railroad and factories, as well as having well-trained and well-armed soldiers, can be best described as Industrialization & Empire Building. Hence the correct answer is option D.
know more about Japan here: https://brainly.com/question/823460
#SPJ11
Which sentence from "The End of the Aztec Empire" is used to support the idea that the Aztec Empire thrived during the 14th and 15th centuries? They raised crops that included maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chiles to trade in busy marketplaces. Moctezuma II welcomed Cortés and his men, hoping that by inviting them into the capital city, he could learn about the Spaniards and discover their weaknesses. Cortés and his men left Tenochtitlán because the native people were very angry with them. The flag of Mexico includes the ancient symbol of the Aztec Empire, an eagle with a snake in its mouth
A. They farmed maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chilies to trade in crowded markets, according to a statement.
The Aztec civilization is known as the final of the great Mesoamerican civilizations before the arrival of the Europeans. They built amazing temple pyramids, used complex agricultural techniques, founded a huge empire, and sacrificed humanity to their gods.
Tenochtitlan, also known as Tenochca, Texcoco, and Tlacopan, were previously part of the Tepanec monarchy, whose dominant power was Azcapotzalco, and became the Aztec Empire in 1427.
According to a statement used to support the belief that the Aztec Empire prospered throughout the 14th and 15th centuries, they grew maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chilies to trade in packed markets. As a result, option A is the correct answer.
To know more about Aztech Empire:
https://brainly.com/question/576529
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Which of the following sentences from “The End of the Aztec Empire” is used to support the idea that the Aztec Empire thrived during the 14th and 15th centuries?
A. They raised crops that included maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chilies to trade in busy marketplaces.
B. Moctezuma welcomed Cortés and his men, hoping that by inviting them into the capital city, he could learn about the Spaniards and discover their weaknesses.
C. Cortés and his men left Tenochtitlán because the native people were very angry with them.
D. The flag of Mexico includes the ancient symbol of the Aztec Empire, an eagle with a snake in its mouth.
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Jim Crow laws are
passed in the South.
A. The Ku Klux Klan is forced to disband.
B. African Americans are forced to leave the South.
C. The Freedmen's Bureau gains influence.
D. Public services become racially segregated.
?
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Public services become racially segregated
1234567
for which purpose might a country use propaganda?
to highlight the troubles within a country to ask for help
to show only the good things about that country
to make people want to leave their country and visit another
to help promote education and new ideas within their country
to show only the good things about that country
In what ways was the outlook and agenda of Progressives in tension with the Founders’ approach to the proper role of government?
Answer:
The outlook and agenda of Progressives in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were in tension with the Founders’ approach to the proper role of government in several ways. Here are some examples:
Limited government: The Founders believed in a limited government with enumerated powers, meaning that the federal government should only have the authority to do what the Constitution explicitly allows. Progressives, on the other hand, believed in a more expansive role for the federal government, including the power to regulate the economy, oversee social welfare, and protect consumers.
Individual rights: The Founders placed a strong emphasis on individual rights, including the right to free speech, assembly, and the press. Progressives were more concerned with collective rights and social justice, including workplace safety regulations, minimum wage laws, and the regulation of monopolies.
Popular sovereignty: The Founders believed in popular sovereignty, meaning that the people have the ultimate authority over the government. Progressives, on the other hand, believed in a more technocratic approach to governance, with experts and bureaucrats making decisions in the public interest.
States' rights: The Founders believed in a federal system of government, with power divided between the national government and the states. Progressives were more focused on national problems and believed in a stronger central government that could address issues that were beyond the scope of individual states.
Overall, the Progressive agenda represented a departure from the Founders’ approach to limited government and individual rights and instead embraced a more expansive role for government in regulating the economy and promoting social welfare. While both the Founders and the Progressives were committed to the idea of American exceptionalism and the principles of liberty and equality, they had different ideas about how best to achieve these goals.
in the late 1400s, china led the world in the production of goods such as silk, porcelain, tea, fruit, drugs, cotton, and weapons, all of which europeans desired. however, europe produced few products that the chinese wanted. why did this encourage the european conquest and plunder of the americas?
Answer: The fact that China led the world in the production of valuable goods in the late 1400s but had little demand for European products encouraged European conquest and plunder of the Americas for a few reasons. Firstly, European nations saw the opportunity to acquire vast resources and precious metals from the Americas, which could be traded with China and other Asian countries for desirable goods. Secondly, the lack of products that the Chinese wanted to import from Europe meant that the Europeans had to find new markets to sell their goods and expand their trade networks. Finally, the discovery of the Americas provided a new frontier for European powers to expand their territories and gain power, prestige, and wealth.
Explanation:
Briefly explains one major difference between Thomas's and Appleby's historical interpretations of influences on the constitution
In a formal paragraph, do you think that wealthier citizens should pay more taxes? Why or why not?
Answer:
Wealthier citizens should pay more taxes. This is because they have the means to do so, and in so doing, they can contribute more to the public good. By investing more, wealthy citizens can fund public services, such as schools, healthcare, and infrastructure. Moreover, higher taxes on the rich can reduce income inequality. Overall, wealthier citizens should pay more taxes. This is not only necessary to ensure that people contribute their fair share, but it can also reduce income inequality. It can also fund critical public services.
Explanation:
Which sentence from "jane addams - making a difference" supports the idea that addams made an unselfish decision to live a life of service when she decided what career path she would follow
a as a young woman, addams struggled with various health issues, including a spinal defect that made it difficult for her to be active.
b she earned a college degree and began traveling, searching for how she could make a difference with her life.
c addams could have found a comfortable job, but she chose the difficult life of helping those less fortunate.
d she gave speeches to the wealthy in order to raise money and gather volunteers.
The sentence that supports the idea that Addams made an unselfish decision to live a life of service is option C: "Addams could have found a comfortable job, but she chose the difficult life of helping those less fortunate."
The phrase "Addams could have found a comfortable job, but she chose the difficult life of helping those less fortunate" demonstrates how selfless Jane Addams was in choosing to live a life of service. (Choice C).
According to this statement, Addams had the option of pursuing a more financially secure and pleasant job, but she choose to devote her life to helping those who were less fortunate. This choice suggests that her career path was motivated by something other than her own comfort or financial gain.
Learn more about the life of service:
https://brainly.com/question/31589383
#SPJ4
What was the battle of LA?
Answer:
Military action fought on 22 March 1880
The Battle of Los Ángeles was a military action fought on 22 March 1880 between the Chilean and Peruvian armies during the Tacna and Arica Campaign of the War of the Pacific. The Chilean forces under Commander in chief Manuel Baquedano assaulted and defeated the Allied stronghold guided by Andrés Gamarra garrisoned at Los Angeles hill top
Explanation:
What responsibility should powerful
countries feel to support those around
them?
Answer:
Powerful countries have a responsibility to support those around them in a variety of ways. Here are a few key responsibilities they should feel:
Humanitarian Aid: Powerful countries should provide aid and support to those in need, such as food, water, medical supplies, and shelter during natural disasters or humanitarian crises.
Economic Support: They should help to promote economic development in struggling countries by providing financial aid, supporting trade and investment, and promoting sustainable development.
Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution: They should work towards peaceful resolution of conflicts between countries and communities, promote human rights and democracy, and encourage political stability.
Environmental Stewardship: They should help to mitigate environmental damage and promote sustainability through sharing of knowledge and resources, technology transfer, and investing in green technologies.
In summary, powerful countries have a responsibility to use their resources, influence, and expertise to support those around them, whether it be through humanitarian aid, economic support, diplomacy, conflict resolution, or environmental stewardship.
Powerful countries are in a position of immense privilege. With that privilege comes an inherent sense of responsibility to help others. Powerful countries have the resources and means to provide assistance to those in need, both domestically and internationally. They can provide aid and assistance to countries suffering from economic hardships, natural disasters, or political instability. They can also help to build infrastructure, provide access to education, and offer humanitarian assistance. Additionally, powerful countries can use their economic, military, and political influence to help countries in need and support those in vulnerable situations. This may include providing aid and assistance to refugees, helping to alleviate poverty, and providing humanitarian assistance. In doing so, powerful countries can make a real difference in the lives of those who need it most. Ultimately, powerful countries have a moral obligation to use their power and influence to help those around them, both domestically and internationally.
For years, the french used french guiana for animal experiments
Yes, it is true that the French used French Guiana for animal experiments for many years.
The tropical rainforest environment and the relative isolation of the territory made it an ideal location for conducting experiments on animals, particularly primates and the French Guiana. However, in recent years, there has been a growing concern over the ethics and necessity of using animals in experiments, and many organizations and governments including the French are working to reduce or eliminate their use.
Learn more about animal experiments: https://brainly.com/question/24249621
#SPJ11
