For the pair of similar figures, use the given areas to find the scale factor from the figure on the left to the figure on the right. Write your answer as a fraction, if necessary.
scale factor =
Find the value of x to the nearest tenth. X= m ​

Answer:

If they were both charged today, it would be on the sixth day that they were actually charging at the same time

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

perimeter of triangle=22 cm

AB+BC+CA=22cm

AB+4+AB =22cm (given,AB=AC)

2AB+4cm=22cm

2AB=22-4cm

2AB=18

AB=18÷2

AB=9cm

There are 30 zeros in the mass of the sun which is 1.9891 x 10³⁰ kg when it is written in standard notation. The correct answer is option B.

To determine how many zeros are in the mass of the sun (1.9891 x 10³⁰ kg) when it is written in standard notation, you first need to recognize that the provided mass is not written correctly. It should be written as 1.9891 x 10^n kg, where n is an integer representing the exponent.

The actual mass of the sun is 1.9891 x 10³⁰ kg. When written in standard notation, this number would be:

1,989,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg

There are 30 zeros in this number when written in standard notation.

So, the correct answer is B) 30.

Learn more about integers:

https://brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

The equations that will find the distance between the lions and giraffes include the following:

B. 11² + 16² = c².

D. 11(2) + 16(2) = 2.

In Mathematics and Science, distance can be defined as the amount of ground that is travelled by a physical object or body over a particular period of time and speed, irrespective of its direction, starting point or ending point.

Mathematically, the distance traveled by both the lions and giraffes when they are positioned one (1) unit apart can be calculated by using this equation:

11² + 16² = c²

Additionally, the distance traveled by both the lions and giraffes when they are positioned two (2) unit apart can be calculated by using this equation:

11(2) + 16(2) = c

Learn more about distance here: brainly.com/question/10545161

#SPJ1

Answer: attach an image

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the principal, we can use the formula for simple interest:

I = P*r*t

where I is the interest, P is the principal, r is the interest rate, and t is the time in years.

We need to convert 82 days to years by dividing it by 365 (the number of days in a year):

t = 82/365

t = 0.2247

Now we can plug in the values we know and solve for P:

67.14 = P*0.0625*0.2247

P = 67.14/(0.0625*0.2247)

P = 1900

Therefore, the principal is $1900.

The choice which best describes the measure of center of these data is (d) Rome data center is "best-described" by median and  data center of "New-York" is "best-described" by mean.

In the table provided below, we see that the "IQR" for Rome is relatively large compared to the IQR for New York, which suggests that that there may be some skewness in the distribution of the Rome data. So, the median would be a better-measure of center than the mean.

On the other hand, the IQR for "New-York" is relatively small, which indicates that the data is more symmetric and the mean would be a better measure of center.

Therefore, the correct answer is (d).

Learn more about Median here

https://brainly.com/question/27353809

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

The table shows data from a survey about the number of times families eat at restaurants during a week. The families are either from Rome, Italy, or New York, New York:

                    High   Low    Q1     Q3    IQR    Median    Mean    σ

Rome              18       1         3       7        4         6.5          6.4    4.3

New York       14       1        4.5    8.5     4          5.5          6.1     3.2

Which of the choices below best describes how to measure the center of these data?

(a) Both centers are best described by the mean.

(b) Both centers are best described by the median.

(c) The Rome data center is best described by the mean. The New York data center is best described by the median.

(d) The Rome data center is best described by the median. The New York data center is best described by the mean.

The data sets represent the answers of twenty students in Class A and twenty students in Class B regarding the number of hours they took to prepare for an exam. These data sets are important because they help us understand the study habits and time allocation of the students in each class.

To analyze the data sets, first, collect the data from each student in both classes. Record the number of hours they took to prepare for the exam, ensuring you have 20 responses from Class A and 20 from Class B. Then, you can compute the average, or mean, time spent for each class by summing up the hours reported by all students in each class and dividing by 20.

Next, compare the averages for Class A and Class B to determine if there is a significant difference in the time spent preparing for the exam. Additionally, you can calculate other statistical measures such as median and mode to gain further insight into the data sets.

Furthermore, analyzing the distribution of the data, such as the range, will provide information on the variability of the time spent studying in each class. This can help identify any trends or patterns in the students' preparation time.

In conclusion, the data sets representing the number of hours spent by students in Class A and Class B to prepare for an exam can provide valuable insights into their study habits, the effectiveness of their preparation, and any possible correlations between time spent studying and exam performance.

To know more about data sets refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22210584#

#SPJ11

The only possible value of k is k = 336675.

Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that k is a prime such that k(k+2013) is a perfect square. Let's denote the perfect square as m^2, where m is a positive integer. Then we can write:

k(k+2013) = m^2

Expanding the left-hand side, we get:

k^2 + 2013k = m^2

Moving all the terms to one side, we get:

k^2 - m^2 + 2013k = 0

Using the difference of squares, we can factor this as:

(k - m)(k + m) + 2013k = 0

Since k is a prime, it must be greater than 1. Thus, k + m and k - m are both integers greater than 1 whose product is divisible by k. This means that at least one of them is divisible by k. Since k is prime, this can only happen if either k + m or km is equal to k. Thus, we have two cases to consider:

Case 1: k + m = k, which implies m = 0. But m is a positive integer, so this is impossible.

Case 2: k - m = k, which implies m = 0. But again, m is a positive integer, so this is impossible.

Therefore, our assumption that k is prime leads to a contradiction, and we conclude that k cannot be prime.

To find the correct value of k, note that k and k+2013 share a common factor of 3. Thus, we can write k = 3n and k+2013 = 3m for some integers n and m. Substituting these expressions into the equation k(k+2013) = m^2 and simplifying, we get:

3n(3n+2013) = m^2

n(3n+2013/3) = m^2/3

n(n+671) = m^2/3

Since n and n+671 are relatively prime, both n and n+671 must be perfect squares. Let's write n = p^2 and n+671 = q^2 for some integers p and q. Then we have:

q^2 - p^2 = 671

Using the difference of squares again, we can factor this as:

(q + p)(q - p) = 671

Since 671 is a prime, its only factors are 1 and 671. Therefore, we have two possibilities:

q + p = 671, q - p = 1, which implies q = 336, p = 335, n = p^2 = 112225, k = 3n = 336675

q + p = 671, q - p = 671, which implies q = 336 + 335 = 671, p = 0, which is not a valid solution since n cannot be negative.

k = 336675. is the best possible answer.

Learn more about Values.

brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ11

Answer:16/45 of his yarn

Step-by-step explanation:

8/9 x 2/5 = 16/45

Answer:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Where:

A = the future balance

P = the present balance ($1430.00)

r = the annual interest rate (2% or 0.02)

n = the number of times the interest is compounded per year (since it's compounded annually, n = 1)

t = the number of years (8 years in this case)

Plugging in the values into the formula:

A = 1430(1 + 0.02/1)^(1*8)

Simplifying the equation:

A = 1430(1.02)^8

Using a calculator or performing the calculations manually:

A ≈ 1430(1.171661)

A ≈ 1674.02

the balance after 8 years will be approximately $1674.02.

The stairs can be broken up into three rectangular prisms

The concrete that will be needed to form the stairs is 9.72 m ^3

To get the volume of concrete

Since they are 3

2.7 / 3

= 0.9

1.5 / 3

= 0.5

0.5 + 0.5

= 1

each width is 3.6m

The volume of each = 0.9 x 1.5 x 3.6 = 4.86

Volume 2 = 0.9 x 1.0 x 3.6 = 3.24

Volume 3 = 0.9 x 0.5 x 3.6 = 1.62

amount of concrete = 1.62 + 3.24 + 4.86

= 9.72 m ^3

Read more on volume here:https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ1

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

20-(5+(9-6)) = 20-(5+(3)) = 20-(8) = 12.

Alternatively, rewrite the question without parenthesis.

20-(5+(9-6)) = 20-(5+9-6) = 20-5-9+6 = 12.

The Pythagorean Theorem is used to prove that triangle FGH is a right triangle at angle F.

Similar triangles are triangles that share these two features listed as follows:

Considering the equivalent side lengths, the proportional relationship for the side lengths in this problem is given as follows:

4/4.8 = FH/3.6 = 5/6.

Hence the length FH is given as follows:

4/4.8 = FH/3.6

FH = 3.6 x 4/4.8

FH = 3.

If the Pythagorean Theorem is respected, the triangle is a right triangle, hence:

3² + 4² = 5²

9 + 16 = 25

25 = 25. -> right trianglge.

More can be learned about similar triangles at brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The ladder makes an angle of approximately 82 degrees with the ground when it is extended to a length of 18 feet and the bottom of the ladder is 4.5 feet from the base of the building.

To determine the angle that the ladder makes with the ground, we can use trigonometry. Let x be the height of the ladder when it is leaned against the building. Then, using the Pythagorean theorem, we have: [tex]x^{2}[/tex] + [tex]4.5^{2}[/tex] = [tex]18^{2}[/tex]

Solving for x, we get: x = sqrt([tex]18^{2}[/tex] - [tex]4.5^{2}[/tex]), x ≈ 17.29

Therefore, the ladder makes an angle θ with the ground such that: sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = x/18, θ = arcsin(x/18)

Substituting x ≈ 17.29, we get: θ ≈ 81.99 degrees

Therefore, the ladder makes an angle of approximately 82 degrees with the ground when it is extended to a length of 18 feet and the bottom of the ladder is 4.5 feet from the base of the building.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619#

#SPJ11

Point estimate is 29.7%.

The confidence interval for the proportion of homeowners who support the ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers is (26.6%, 32.8%).

A) The point estimate is the proportion of homeowners who support the ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers.

In this case, 22 out of 74 homeowners support the ban. To find the point estimate, divide the number of supporters (22) by the total number of homeowners in the sample (74):
Point estimate = 22 / 74 ≈ 0.297 or 29.7%

B) To find the lower and upper limits, we need to consider the margin of error (±3.1%). Subtract the margin of error from the point estimate for the lower limit, and add the margin of error to the point estimate for the upper limit:
Lower limit = 29.7% - 3.1% = 26.6%
Upper limit = 29.7% + 3.1% = 32.8%

The confidence interval for the proportion of homeowners who support the ban on nonnatural lawn fertilizers is (26.6%, 32.8%).

To learn more about interval, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/30486507

#SPJ11

human hair to grow 20 inches, considering the length of hair is proportional to the number of months it has grown.

First, let's establish the proportionality constant, which is the average rate at which human hair grows. On average, human hair grows approximately 0.5 inches per month.

Now, let's find out how many months it takes for hair to grow 20 inches. We can set up a proportion equation as follows:

Length of hair (in inches) / Number of months = Proportionality constant
Let "x" be the number of months it takes for hair to grow 20 inches. We can write the equation as:
20 inches / x months = 0.5 inches/month

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides by x months, which gives us:
20 inches = 0.5 inches/month * x months
Now, we can divide both sides by 0.5 inches/month:

x months = 20 inches / 0.5 inches/month
x months = 40 months

So, it takes 40 months for human hair to grow 20 inches, considering the length of hair is proportional to the number of months it has grown.

To know more about length refer here

https://brainly.com/question/8552546#

#SPJ11

The inequality that represents t, the number of hours past midnight, when the temperature was colder than -3 degrees Celsius is t > 8.

When the temperature drops at a steady rate of 1 degree Celsius per hour, it will take 8 hours to reach -3 degrees Celsius from the initial temperature of 5 degrees Celsius.

Therefore, any time past 8 hours after midnight will result in a temperature colder than -3 degrees Celsius.

Thus, the inequality t > 8 represents the number of hours past midnight when the temperature was colder than -3 degrees Celsius.

Learn more about temperature conversions

brainly.com/question/30451535

#SPJ11

Planting an additional 210 vines will maximize grape production.

To find the number of vines that should be planted to maximize grape production, we need to find the maximum value of the function A(n) = (800 + n)(10 - 0.01n), which represents the number of pounds of grapes produced per acre as a function of the number of additional vines planted. To find the maximum value, we can take the derivative of A(n) with respect to n and set it equal to zero.

A'(n) = -0.01n² + 2.1n + 800

Setting A'(n) = 0, we get

-0.01n²+ 2.1n + 800 = 0

Solving for n using the quadratic formula, we get

n ≈ 210

Therefore, planting an additional 210 vines will maximize grape production.

Learn more about maximize

brainly.com/question/14568010

#SPJ11

Both Zola and Amir are correct in writing the area of the rectangle. They have simply used different ways of expressing the same value.

Zola and Amir have both written the area of a rectangle using different algebraic expressions.

Zola wrote the area of the rectangle as `2a + 3a + 4a`, which can be simplified using the distributive property of multiplication:

2a + 3a + 4a = (2 + 3 + 4)a

Therefore, Zola's expression simplifies to `(2 + 3 + 4)a`, which is the same as Amir's expression.

Amir wrote the area of the rectangle as `(2 + 3 + 4) a`, which can also be simplified:

(2 + 3 + 4) a = 9a

Therefore, Amir's expression simplifies to `9a`, which is the same as the sum of the terms in Zola's expression.

Therefore, both Zola and Amir are correct in writing the area of the rectangle. They have simply used different ways of expressing the same value.

To know more about area , refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/30307509#

#SPJ11

To apply the pigeonhole principle, we need to determine the number of pigeonholes and the number of pigeons. The pigeonhole principle cannot be applied to this question.

In this case, the"  holes" are the high minidresses and the" lockers" are the ranges of  particular records. Let's assume that the range of  particular records is from 6  bases( 72  elevation) to 7  bases( 84  elevation).   The difference between the upper and lower bounds of the range is

84- 72 =  12  elevation.

We can divide this range into five subintervals of length2.4  elevation( 72,74.4),(74.4,76.8),(76.8,79.2),(79.2,81.6), and(81.6, 84).  

Since there are only five subintervals, but we've three high minidresses, it isn't  inescapably true that two of the  platoon members must have  particular records that are within four  elevation of each other. For  illustration, if the three high minidresses have  particular records of 6  bases 3  elevation( 75  elevation), 6  bases 7  elevation( 79  elevation), and 7  bases( 84  elevation),  also none of them have  particular records within four  elevation of each other.

Learn more about  pigeonhole principle at

https://brainly.com/question/29242775

#SPJ4

The value of the rate of change when we put a glass of water at room temperature is 1/3.

The pace at which one quantity changes in relation to another quantity is known as the rate of change function. Simply said, the rate of change is calculated by dividing the amount of change in one thing by the equal amount of change in another.

The connection defining how one quantity changes in response to the change in another quantity is given by the rate of change formula. The formula for calculating the rate of change from y coordinates to x coordinates is y/x = (y2 - y1)/. (x2 - x1 ).

Rate of change  = change in temperature / time

= 10-5/15

=5 / 15

= 1/3

Therefore, the Rate of change is 1/3.

Learn more about Rate of change:

https://brainly.com/question/29504549

#SPJ4

Complete question;

What is the value of the rate of change when we put a glass of water at room temperature in the freezer for 15 minutes, what is its temperature at 5 minutes and then at 10 minutes.

Answer:

Top

Step-by-step explanation:

The closer the data points come to forming a straight line when plotted, the higher the correlation between the two variables, or the stronger the relationship. Therefore, the top option has the most closest lines to a linear function.

(Ex. 1) Y=4x-2

This example shows the corresponding possibilities of a linear regression because of the way the line is represented as graphed, making a straight line as similar to the top option

(Ex. 2) f(x) = x^2-5+15

This example dialates to a similar option like the third option, which isnt linear regression because of it being a quadratic function.

In a nut shell, all data plotted on the graph that are formed closer together and corresponds to a linear equation is a linear regression

The difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations from which these samples were drawn is 0.16.The bound for the error of estimation is 95% confidence that the true difference in proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations is between 0.058 and 0.262.

To estimate the difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations, we can use the sample proportions and apply the formula:

p1 - p2 = (x1/n1) - (x2/n2)

where p1 and p2 are the true population proportions, x1 and x2 are the numbers of firstborn or only children in the samples, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

The sample proportions,

p1 = x1/n1 = 0.7

p2 = x2/n2 = 0.54

Substituting these values into the formula,

p1 - p2 = (x1/n1) - (x2/n2) = 0.7 - 0.54 = 0.16

Therefore, we estimate that the difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations is 0.16.

To find a bound for the error of estimation, we can use the formula:

E = z sqrt(p1*(1-p1)/n1 + p2*(1-p2)/n2)

where E is the margin of error, z is the critical value for the desired level of confidence (we'll use z = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval), and p1 and p2 are the sample proportions.

Substituting the given values, we get:

E = 1.96sqrt(0.7(1-0.7)/180 + 0.54*(1-0.54)/100) ≈ 0.102

Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the true difference in proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations is between 0.058 and 0.262

To learn more about proportions : https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ11

The total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years can be modeled by the function f(x) = 200 * (1.05)ˣ.

To model the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after depositing her $200 and accruing interest over time, we can combine the two functions h(x) and s(x).

We can use the following formula to represent the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years:

f(x) = h(x) + h(x) * s(x)

where h(x) represents the $200 that Victoria has saved at home, and h(x) * s(x) represents the amount of interest accrued on that $200 in x years according to the function s(x).

The justification for this formula is that the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years is the sum of the initial amount of $200 and the interest accrued on that amount over x years.

The interest accrued can be calculated by multiplying the initial amount by the interest rate function s(x).

For example, if Victoria leaves her $200 in the bank for 5 years, the total amount of money she will have in her account can be calculated using the formula:

f(5) = h(5) + h(5) * s(5) = 200 + 200 * (1.05)⁴ ≈ $273.04

Therefore, the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years can be modeled using the function f(x) = h(x) + h(x) * s(x).

Learn more about function

brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

Based on the observed outcome, it is therefore very or highly unlikely that Romain's probability is equal to that of the other brothers, and thus  it is possible that Romain is cheating.

Beneath the assumption that each brother has an break even with chance of getting picked in each draw, the likelihood of Romain not getting picked indeed once out of 12 times is:

P(Romain not picked) = (2/3)¹²

                                  = 0.0077

This is one that is less than 1%, which suggests that the observed result is made up of a likelihood less than 1% beneath the given speculation. Therefore, we need to reject the hypothesis that each brother has an equal chance of getting picked in all of the draw.

Learn more about probability  from

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

See text below

Alexandre has two brothers: Hugo and Romain. Every day Romain draws a name out of a hat to randomly select one of the three brothers to wash the dishes. Alexandre suspected that Romain is cheating, so he kept track of the draws, and found that out of 12 draws, Romain didn't get picked even once. 1 Let's test the hypothesis that each brother has an equal chance of of getting picked in each draw versus 3 the alternative that Romain's probability is lower. Assuming the hypothesis is correct, what is the probability of Romain not getting picked even once out of 12 times? Round your answer, if necessary, to the nearest tenth of a percent. Let's agree that if the observed outcome has a probability less than 1% under the tested hypothesis, we will reject the hypothesis. What should we conclude regarding the hypothesis? Choose 1 answer: We cannot reject the hypothesis. B We should reject the hypothesis.

An interest rate of approximately 2.40% per annum, compounded annually, is required to double an investment in 29 years.

Let "r" be the annual interest rate, then the investment will double after 29 years if (1 + r)^29 = 2. Solving this equation, we get r ≈ 0.0240 or 2.40% (rounded to two decimal places) as the required annual interest rate. This means that if the investment is compounded annually at this rate, it will double after 29 years.

Alternatively, we can use the formula for compound interest, A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A is the future value, P is the present value, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

We want to find the interest rate, r, that will double the investment, so we can set A = 2P, t = 29, n = 1 (compounded annually), and solve for r. This gives us r ≈ 0.0240 or 2.40%.

For more questions like Investment click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/15105766

#SPJ11

John will be able to buy the 10 baseball bats for his team with some money left over is -$6.50 and David will be able to buy the 3 pairs of running shoes for his kids with some money left over is $12.30.

Based on the given information, we can calculate the total cost for each customer after factoring in the sales tax and discounts.

For John:
The cost of 10 baseball bats without any discounts or tax would be 10 * $25 = $250.
Since baseball bats are 5% off, John will get a discount of 0.05 * $250 = $12.50.
So, the cost of 10 baseball bats after discount is $250 - $12.50 = $237.50.
Adding 8% sales tax to this amount, the total cost for John will be $237.50 + (0.08 * $237.50) = $256.50.

For David:
The cost of 3 pairs of running shoes without any discounts or tax would be 3 * $50 = $150.
Since running shoes are 15% off, David will get a discount of 0.15 * $150 = $22.50.
So, the cost of 3 pairs of running shoes after discount is $150 - $22.50 = $127.50.
Adding 8% sales tax to this amount, the total cost for David will be $127.50 + (0.08 * $127.50) = $137.70.

Therefore, John will be able to buy the 10 baseball bats for his team with some money left over ($250 - $256.50 = -$6.50) and David will be able to buy the 3 pairs of running shoes for his kids with some money left over ($150 - $137.70 = $12.30).

Learn more about sales tax,

https://brainly.com/question/30109497

#SPJ11

We have found a value of b that makes y(t) = [tex]e^2t[/tex] [1; 4; -1/2] a solution of y′ = [4 1 3; 2 3 3; −2 −1 −1]y. To check if y(t) is a solution of y′ = Ay, we need to substitute it into the differential equation and see if it holds.

Let's start by finding y′:

y′(t) = [[tex]2e^2t, 8e^2t, 4be^2t[/tex]]

Now, let's find Ay:

Ay = [4 1 3; 2 3 3; −2 −1 −1] [1; 4; b] = [4+4b; 14; -5-b]

We want y(t) = e^2t [1; 4; b] to satisfy y′ = Ay, so we set them equal:

y′ = Ay

[[tex]2e^2t; 8e^2t; 4be^2t] = [4+4b; 14; -5-b] e^2t[/tex] [1; 4; b]

Expanding this equation, we get:

[tex]2e^2t[/tex]= (4+4b)[tex]e^2t[/tex]

[tex]8e^2t[/tex] = 14 [tex]e^2t[/tex]

[tex]4be^2t[/tex]= (-5-b) [tex]e^2t[/tex]

The second equation is always true, so we can ignore it. For the first equation, we can cancel out [tex]e^2t[/tex] on both sides to get:

2 = 4+4b

Solving for b, we get:

b = -1/2

Finally, we can substitute b = -1/2 back into the third equation to check if it holds:

4be^2t = (-5-b) [tex]e^2t[/tex]

-2e^2t = (-5 + 1/2)[tex]e^2t[/tex]

This equation is true, so we have found a value of b that makes y(t) = [tex]e^2t[/tex] [1; 4; -1/2] a solution of y′ = [4 1 3; 2 3 3; −2 −1 −1]y.

Learn more about  differential equation

https://brainly.com/question/14620493

#SPJ4

The correct statement regarding the maximum values of the quadratic functions is given as follows:

Function 1 has the larger maximum at (4, 1).

The standard definition of a quadratic function is given as follows:

y = ax² + bx + c.

The x-coordinate of the vertex of a quadratic function is given as follows:

x = -b/2a.

Hence, for each function, the x-coordinate of the vertex is given as follows:

Each function has a negative leading coefficient, hence the vertex represents a maximum value, and the y-coordinate is given as follows:

1 > -14, hence the correct statement is given as follows:

Function 1 has the larger maximum at (4, 1).

More can be learned about quadratic functions at https://brainly.com/question/31895757

#SPJ1