Think of the graph for the inequality y < 3x - 6
1. Would the line on the graph be dotted or solid? Why?
2. Would the shading be above the line or below the line? Why?
***Extra Credit
Name one point (x,y) that would be a solution to this inequality.

Answer:

Dear user,

Answer to your query is provided below

Scientific notation = 1.8x10^0

Step-by-step explanation:

This is usually expressed simply as 1.8 (Recall that 10^0 = 1.)

1.8×10^0

Write z in exponential form:

[tex]z=1-i=\sqrt2 e^{-i\frac\pi4}[/tex]

Then taking the logarithm, we get

[tex]\mathrm{Ln}(z)=\ln(\sqrt2) + \ln e^{-i\frac\pi4} = \boxed{\ln(\sqrt2)-\dfrac\pi4i}[/tex]

so a is the correct answer.

Answer:

The range is {4,5,7}

Step-by-step explanation:

The range of a relation is the output values  The values are 4,7,5  we normally put them in order from smallest to largest

The range is {4,5,7}

Answer:

300/60=5 more words per minute

80+5 = 85 words per minute

or

80 x 60 = 4800 + 300 = 5100

5100 / 60 = 85 words per minute

Hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the probability that exactly 8 dentists in 10 samples recommend Colgate toothpaste is;

P(X) = 0.0043

P(X) = 0.43%

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability that a dentist recommend Colgate is;

P = 90% = 0.9

The probability that a dentist doesn't recommend Colgate is;

P' = 1 - P = 1 -0.9 = 0.1

Of 10 sample dentists, the probability that exactly 8 dentists recommend Colgate toothpaste is;

8 will recommend and two will not recommend it.

P(X) = P^8 × P'^2

P(X) = (0.9)^8 × (0.1)^2

P(X) = 0.0043

P(X) = 0.43%

The Probability of exactly 8 dentists in sample recommend Colgate toothpaste is 0.0043.

Since, Colgate claims that 90% of dentists recommend Colgate toothpaste.

Probability of dentist, who recommend Colgate toothpaste = 0.9

Probability of dentist, who does not recommend Colgate toothpaste,

                                       = 1 - 0.9 = 0.1

When 10 dentist randomly choose , out of which 8 dentists recommend Colgate toothpaste. It means that 8 recommend  Colgate toothpaste and 2 recommend other tooth paste.

Thus, The Probability of exactly 8 dentists in sample recommend Colgate ,

                  [tex]=(0.9)^{8}*(0.1)^{2} =0.0043[/tex]

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/20046335

Hope this helps!

Stay safe, have a good day :D

Answer:

expected profit = $-1.48

Step-by-step explanation:

The required expected value can be solved below.

The total number of ticket they will sell = 500 tickets.

So,

expected profit = expected return - expected cost

1 grand price of 2000 = 1/500 × 2000 = 4

4 second price of $400 = 4/500 × 400 = 3.2

16 third price of $10 = 16/500 × 10 = 0.32

expected return = 4 + 3.2 + 0.32 = $7.52

expected cost = $9

expected profit = expected return - expected cost

expected profit = 7.52 - 9

expected profit = $-1.48

Answer:

The GCF is going to be 32

Answer:

32x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

B on edge

Answer & Step-by-step explanation:

4(y + 2) - 2

Distribute 4 to (y + 2)

4y + 8 - 2

Combine like terms

4y + 6

So, your answer in the simplest form is 4y + 6

Answer:

The probability that they have a mean height greater than 71.9 inches

P(  x⁻ ≥71.9) =  0.0022

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given mean of the Population μ= 70.9

Standard deviation of the Populationσ = 2.1

Given sample size 'n' =36

let x⁻ be the mean height

given  x⁻ =71.9 inches

[tex]Z=\frac{x^{-} -mean}{\frac{S.D}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

[tex]Z=\frac{71.9 -70.9}{\frac{2.1}{\sqrt{36} } } = \frac{1}{0.35} = 2.85[/tex]

The probability that they have a mean height greater than 71.9 inches

P(  x⁻ ≥71.9) = P(Z ≥ 2.85)

                    = 1 - P(Z≤ 2.85)

                   =  1 - ( 0.5 + A(2.85)

                   = 0.5 - A( 2.85)

                  = 0.5 - 0.4978

                  = 0.0022

The probability that they have a mean height greater than 71.9 inches

 P(  x⁻ ≥71.9) =  0.0022

Answer:

the answer is 0.0022

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The area of a trapezoid is 1/2 (b₁ + b₂) * h where b₁ and b₂ are the bases and h is the height. The answer is 1/2 * (3 + 4) * 1 = 3.5.

Answer:

D Y is all real numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

When looking at the y axis, you can see that if the graph were to be bigger, the line would keep going. This means y will never stop.

Answer:

662

Step-by-step explanation:

l x w

10x41

6x22

8x15

662

Answer:

The IV will run [tex]66.67 \ ml /hr[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The mass of Magnesium sulfate is  [tex]m_g = 30 \ g[/tex]

   The volume of the Magnesium sulfate  [tex]V_R = 500ml[/tex]

   The rate at which the dose of the solution (Magnesium sulfate + Lactated Ringers. ) is infused is  [tex]R = 4g/hr[/tex]

The concentration of Magnesium sulfate in Lactated Ringers  is mathematically evaluated as

         [tex]C_m = \frac{m_g}{V_R}[/tex]

substituting values

          [tex]C_m = \frac{30}{500}[/tex]

          [tex]C_m = 0.06\ g/ ml[/tex]

This implies that

     0.06 g of Magnesium sulfate is in every 1 ml of  Lactated Ringers

So  4 g  of  Magnesium sulfate is in x ml of  Lactated Ringers

So

        [tex]x = \frac{4}{0.06}[/tex]

       [tex]x = 66.67 \ ml[/tex]

So the amount of the solution in ml that is been infused in 1 hour is  

      [tex]66.67 \ ml /hr[/tex]

Answer:

x = 1/2    x=-5

Step-by-step explanation:

(2x-1)(x+5)=0

Using the zero product property

2x-1 =0  x+5 =0

2x= 1    x = -5

x = 1/2    x=-5

I hope This Helps❣ If U Nees Help Notify Me And I Will Post More❣

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.1475-0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{400}}}=3.17[/tex]  

The p value for this case would be given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z>3.17)=0.00076[/tex]  

For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=400 represent the random sample taken

X=59 represent number of defectives from the company B

[tex]\hat p=\frac{59}{400}=0.1475[/tex] estimated proportion of defectives from the company B  

[tex]p_o=0.1[/tex] is the value to verify

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the true proportion of defectives is higher than 0.1 then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p \leq 0.1[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p > 0.1[/tex]  

The statistic would be given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.1475-0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{400}}}=3.17[/tex]  

The p value for this case would be given by:

[tex]p_v =P(z>3.17)=0.00076[/tex]  

For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is significantly higher than 0.1 and then Company B can reject the shipment

Answer:

6.8

Step-by-step explanation:

27 / 4 = 6.75, which rounded to the nearest tenth, is 6.8.

Answer:

D. Time ( length)

Step-by-step explanation:

The function is measuring the length of the race, and the time it took to complete. So, it would be D.

// have a great day //

Answer:

D. Time(length)

Step-by-step explanation:

→The time is on the outside because, according to the information that has been given/provided, the length of the race depends on the time taken to complete the race.

This means the correct answer is "D. Time(length)."

Answer:

Cost of visit = 50 + 100n

Step-by-step explanation:

$50 is the set price of the visit.

$100 is the cost per cavity.

N is the number of cavities.

Since we don't know the number of cavities, 'n' will fill that spot.

100 x n will be the total cavity cost.

Cavity cost + set price of visit will equal the total cost of the visit.

Answer:

  A.  G(x) = (x -3)^3 -(x -3)

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph before it was shifted left will be a right-shift of the equation shown. That is accomplished by replacing x with (x-1.5). Then the right-shifted equation is ...

  G(x) = ((x-1.5) -1.5)^3 -((x -1.5) -1.5)

  G(x) = (x -3)^3 -(x -3) . . . . matches choice A

Answer:

Rectangle

Step-by-step explanation:

Count the units. For the triangle, A=0.5bh. 0.5(4)(6)=A. A=12

Now, for the rectangle, A=bh. A=(3)(5). A=15. The rectangle is larger

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

_______________________________

Hey!!

Solution,

X+61+42=180[ sum of angle in triangle]

or,X+103=180

or,X=180-103

X=77°

So the value of X is 77°

Hope it helps..

Good luck on your assignment

____________________________

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes.  Here's why:  We can obtain the graph of the inverse of the function shown by reflecting the red graph about the line y = x.  The resulting graph is true for all x values and for all y values; it passes the vertical line test.

Answer:

yes. ^^^^^^^^

Step-by-step explanation:

We can obtain the graph of the inverse of the function shown by reflecting the red graph about the line y = x.  The resulting graph is true for all x values and for all y values; it passes the vertical line test.

Answer:

The average velocity of the object over the interval of time [2,6] is of 18 units of distance per unit of time.

Step-by-step explanation:

The average velocity can be calculated as the division of the position change by the time change.

Find the average velocity of the object over the interval of time [2,6 ].

6 - 2 = 4 units of time (t, min,...)

s(6) = 141, s(2) = 69

141 - 69 = 72 units of distance(m, km...)

72/4 = 18 u.d./u.t.

The average velocity of the object over the interval of time [2,6] is of 18 units of distance per unit of time.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

They are congruent because of the SSS theorem.  The chords are congruent because the angles are congruent (angles are congruent because they are vertical angles).  Congruent central angles have congruent chords.  The other two sides are congruent because they are all radii of the circle and radius are always congruent.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangles are isosceles and congruent  too. ( both have 2  sides congruent  as  radius and the angles between them are congruent- SAS)

Answer:

10 players

Step-by-step explanation:

If you count the x’s, there are 10.

Why ask this question? You could have just counted

Answer:

22 players

Step-by-step explanation:

It specifically says 'at least 3 runs' so you would have to count all the x's in the columns 3, 4, and 5.

There are 10 x's in the 3 column

There are 3 x's in the 4 column

There are 9 x's in the 5 column

Hope this helps!

Answer:

a

the displacement of the plane is  [tex]- \= w[/tex]

b

The displacement of plane  from Portland to Akron with layover at Houston is  

       [tex]\= v + \= w[/tex]

c

  the vector which defines this displacement is  [tex]\= v + \= w =- 2500 \ km[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are the

   The displacement from Portland, Oregon to Houston, Texas. is  [tex]\= v[/tex]

    The displacement  from Houston, Texas to Akron, Ohio.  is [tex]\= w[/tex]a

a

   The motion of the plane in question a is in the opposite direction to vector [tex]\= w[/tex]

So the displacement of the plane is  [tex]- \= w[/tex]

b

The motion of Portland to Houston to Akron is in the direction of both vector [tex]\= v[/tex] and  [tex]\= w[/tex]  so

The displacement of plane  from Portland to Akron with layover at Houston is  

       [tex]d = \= v + \= w[/tex]

c

From the question we are told that the plane flies over Portland to get to  Anchorage, Alaska which implies that it is moving in opposite direction to the vector [tex]\= v[/tex]

   Give that distance from Portland to Houston is  [tex]\= v = 3000 km[/tex]

           and the distance from Portland to  Anchorage is [tex]\= w = - 5500[/tex]km

Then the vector which defines this displacement is mathematically represented as

   [tex]\= v + \= w = 3000 -5500[/tex]

    [tex]\= v + \= w =- 2500 \ km[/tex]

Answer:

Step 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The mistake was made in Step 3.

Step 1: Subtract the wholes. 4 - 1 = 3

Step 2: Subtract the fractions. 5/6 - 3/6 = 2/6

After Step 2, He should have added them instead of subtracting them:

3 + 2/6 = 3 2/6

So, step 3 was his mistake.

Answer:step 3

Step-by-step explanation: he should have added

Answer:

The table that illustrates this equation is table A:

1   -6   0   up   (0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

The values of the parameters a, b, and c have to agree with the values for the general quadratic equation in standard form:

[tex]y = a\,x^2+b\,x+c[/tex]

compared to:

[tex]y=x^2-6\,x[/tex]

So the coefficient "a" of the quadratic term in our case is: "1"

the coefficient "b" of the linear term is : "-6"

the coefficient "c" for the constant term s : "0" (zero)

since the coefficient "a" is a positive number, we know that the parabola's branches must be opening "UP".

The y intercept can be found by evaluating the expression for x = 0:

[tex]y=x^2-6x\\y=(0)^2-6\,(0)\\y=0[/tex]

Therefore the y-intercept is at (0, 0)

These results agree with those of Table "A"

Answer:

Table A.)

Step-by-step explanation:

a 1, b -6, c 0, up, (0, 0), Table A.

answer: D) 439.85

Step-by-step explanation:

we are given the price of the bike which is $413.

we are also given the sales tax which is 6.5%.

sales tax is added to the original price to give us our total. so in order to find the total cost we need to find what the 6.5% sales tax is and add it to our original price. to find the sales tax number in dollars we need to set up our formula. The easiest formula is to use a proportion. X is out of 413 = 6.5% is out of 100%. X/413=6.5/100. We can then cross multiply then divide. 6.5 times 413=2,684.5. then divide 2684.5÷100= 26.845.

we need to round up to the nearest cent since we are working with dollars and cents 26.85. 26.85 is 6.5% of the price of the bike which is 413. Now we just simply add the tax to the original price and we get the cost. 413+26.85=439.85

Answer:    The answer is D) 439.85

Step-by-step explanation: