Problem 23.1 For each of the following situations, decide whether a contract has been made. Give your reasons.

An auctioneer says, "Do I hear a bid for this antique sofa?" Someone in the crowd says, "$300."

b. Yukiko says to Basil, "I'm going to sell my car for $500." Basil replies, "All right, here is the money. I'll take it."

c. The citizens of a small town collect $1,000 and offer it as a reward for the capture of a suspected criminal. The sheriff captures the suspect and seeks the reward.

d. Megan's father promises to pay her $1,000 when she turns 18. On her eighteenth birthday, she seeks the money.

e. Standing at one end of a long bridge, Shelly says to Lynn, "I'll give you $s if you walk across the bridge." Lynn says nothing but starts walking across the bridge.

f. Liz offers Sharon $100 to steal four hubcaps for her new sports car. Sharon steals the hubcaps from a car dealership, brings them to Liz, and asks for the money.​

Answer:

1) to form a more perfect union; 2) establish justice; 3) insure domestic tranquility; 4) provide for the common defense; 5) promote the general welfare; and 6) secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Because Earth is made up of water

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because to me I depends on someone personally not their looks also if they want what you want an you think u are in a good relationship than yes if not no

Answer:

probably refuse. i would want to be physically and mentally attracted to my husband. now if he was *not handsome, filled with good manners but RICH* well that changes a little bit.

Explanation:

Answer:

a motorcycle or a dirtbike

Explanation:

Answer:

program is the role played by the dispatcher during an emergency incident. ... Fortunately, the second house fire was discovered by a police officer while responding to the first house fire. ... During an in-progress incident, I was able to put 2 & 2 together and ...

Explanation:

you have to study

Answer:

This is going to vary, but I think by and large, it would go like this:

Explanation:

You call 911 requesting the police. The initial call-taker may be from the police or fire department or an operator. In most cases, the call will be transferred to the correct department. Now, you are speaking to the police call-taker. In a small town, the call-taker and dispatcher may be the same person. You may actually hear them asking questions of you and then broadcasting it immediately over the police radio. But in most cities, the police call-taker would start interviewing you as to what happened, the location (even if it is displayed), descriptions of suspects, need for EMS, weapons seen, last known direction of travel of suspects, etc. The more information the officer responding has, the better chance they have of safely catching the suspect. This information is relayed to the dispatcher who would broadcast it to an available nearby police officer. There are times when an officer wants certain information and needs the dispatcher to request the call-taker to call you back to get more information.

Answer:

Lumen Learning

For this reason, modern presidents may find more success in using their popularity to increase media and social media attention on an issue. Even if the president is not the reason for congressional action, he or she can...

Explanation:

:D

Answer: I believe it’s they have a lower burden proof compared to criminal cases.

Explanation:

Answer:

Pen und papr

Also notebook is very important then you cant write.

DIALOUGE

Polize: Hallo 911 police here

Victim: Oh hallo! Plis help I-

Polize: WAIT Let me get notebook, I need to write it on paper.

SEE? YOU SEE? IT VERY IMPORTANT.

Explanation:

Answer:

They don't even have to come when you call. In most states the government and police owe no legal duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack. ... When the women frantically called the police a second time, the dispatcher promised help would come—but no officers were even dispatched.

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Because we Will Made fraud

Answer:

But, during all this time the burden of proof, the risk of non-persuasion, remains with the plaintiff, except as to affirmative defenses, etc. The burden of evidence is simply the burden of making or meeting a prima-facie case.

Explanation:

Answer:

second amendment:

people have a right to bear arms as individuals rather than only as part of a militia. the framers of the Constitution intended to preserve individual rights above state rights.

Answer:

Biden is the current president

Answer:

Joseph R. Biden

Explanation:

currently president of the United States

Answer:

Rules work.

Explanation:

This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.

FOR

-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights

-People wouldn't voluntarily  pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.

-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority

-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest

-corruption

AGAINST

-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?

-wrongfully convicted

apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though

This is a great question, though my opinions may sound contradicting at times but bear with me.

I believe the idea of death penalty is immoral due to the fact we are all simply mere humans and don't have the right to end another's life. However, the accused and convicted act inexplicably hostile and certain crimes are atrocious, though statically shown, they do not seek redemption or show traits of repenting for their crimes so death would be the easy way out and the victim/s shall not get proper justice. Having said that, isolation and torture are also an invasion their human rights. Its all a bit of a predicament. There are also numerous people wrongfully convicted and the possibility they would  be murdered is absurd.

In conclusion, i really just dont know as humans a re flawed and bias and can most definately make mistakes. The death penalty could be used against certain cases of horrific murder, r*ape, and things regarding children

Answer: I think it is loud and soft

Explanation:

hope it helps

Answer:

i dont really know

Explanation:

good question

Answer:

Okay pero habla espalol

Answer:

Explanation:

according to this site, "Copyright protection also does not extend to any “idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied” in a work." So id say A? Im not sure, but hope this helps!

Copyright restrictions do not extend to opinions. Option (a) is correct for this question.

The term "broadcasting" originated from the agricultural practice of scattering seeds widely across a field before planting them. Later, it came to be used to describe how information was widely disseminated via telegraph or printed materials.

A copyright is a sort of intellectual property that, typically for a certain period of time, grants its owner the sole authority to reproduce, transmit, adapt, exhibit, and perform a creative work. The creative work could take the form of something musical, artistic, educational, or literary. The purpose of copyright is to safeguard the creative work that represents the original expression of an idea, not the concept itself.

Copyright limits are guidelines that govern how intellectual property that has been granted a third party license may or may not be utilized. On the website that hosts the work or on the piece itself, a copyright notice is frequently included.

Therefore, Option (a) is correct. Copyright restrictions do not extend to opinions.

Learn more about Broadcast, here;

https://brainly.com/question/11886930

#SPJ2

Answer: The difference between the two is that ethics are moral values that a certain individual sets up for themself. Laws are way different because they are structured rules that are utilized by the government for all of society to follow. A good example would be the death penalty, it is ethical but many view it as immoral.

Answer:

Legislative intent refers to why laws are created, and it is therefore an important element in understanding how laws are to be applied. Legislative history records are important resources for the interpretation of existing laws and for the shaping of new laws.

Answer:

Dumpster diving is legal in the U.S. except where prohibited by local regulation. You can contact the city attorney in Mesa for the answer. In general, if the dumpster is on private property, you should not enter the dumpster especially where there is a No Trespassing or Private Property sign where you can be arrested but if it is on public property like a street, it would be okay.

The dumpster dive is legal in Casa Grande, AZ. It is illegal in Mesa AZ illegal and Phoniex AZ

In the United States, dumpster diving is permitted unless it is strictly forbidden by municipal laws.

Dumpster diving is permitted in all 50 states. In State of California v. Greenwood, the Supreme Court held in 1988 that it is acceptable to inspect garbage as long as it does not violate any local, regional, or national laws.

In Arizona, dumpster diving is not against the law. But keep in mind that we are discussing dumpster diving, NOT trespassing, here. You must thus be informed with the trespassing laws in your state.

Scottsdale Sgt. Ben Hoster described Phoniex, Arizona as "unsafe and unhygienic." "We don't want anybody entering there and getting cut, hurt, or contracting a disease.

Learn more about dumpster dive here;

https://brainly.com/question/25361443

#SPJ2

Answer:

The term "hacking" is often used as if it's synonymous with illegal computer access. Ethical hackers often break into computer systems -- with permission -- to find vulnerabilities and improve security. Hacking is a crime when the perpetrators access systems without the owner's permission.

Explanation:

Hope it is helpful !

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

Conflict of interest typically involves one's supposed neutrality and their biasism. In this case, the person buying the product benefits the company.

Answer:

It is B. Receiving free travel

Explanation:

I got it right on my test.

Receiving free travel might be regarded as a conflict of interest.

Hence, Option B exists the correct answer.

To learn more about Conflict of interest, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/2928297

#SPJ2

Answer:

D. Replenishment

Explanation:

I looked it up.

Answer:

left foot for accel and right foot for brake