O transfers a sum "in trust for A for life, then to A's first child to reach 25." A has no child age 25 or older. There is no validating life; the contingent remainder is void. You cannot prove that A's first child to reach 25 will do so within 21 years after A's death: the remainder is valid.
The step to determine whether the given interest might not vest within the perpetuity period of lives in being plus 21 years." The Rule Against Perpetuities is a rule that strikes down contingent interests that might vest too remotely. The essential thing to grasp about the Rule is that it is a rule of logical proof.
What we are looking for is a person who will enable us to prove that the contingent interest will vest or fail within the life, or at the death, of that person, or within 21 years after that person's death. This person, if found, is called the validating life.
Learn more about contingent, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30478373
#SPJ4
O conveys "to A for life, then to such of A's children as survive him, but if none of A's children survives him, to B and her heirs." At the time of the conveyance, A is alive and has two children, C and D. What is the state of the title?
The conveyance of "to A for life, then to such of A's children as survive him, but if none of A's children survives him, to B and her heirs" creates a life estate in A with a contingent remainder in A's children.
The remainder is contingent because it is subject to the condition that A's children must survive A in order to take possession of the property.
At the time of the conveyance, A is alive and has two children, C and D. Therefore, C and D both have a contingent remainder in the property. If A dies and either C or D survives him, that child will take possession of the property. If neither C nor D survives A, the property will pass to B and her heirs.
In summary, A has a life estate, and C and D have a contingent remainder in the property. If neither C nor D survive A, the property will pass to B and her heirs.
Learn more about Conveyance here
https://brainly.com/question/13812901
#SPJ4
When testifying at trial, the witness for the plaintiff will undergo _______ by the plaintiff's attorney, and a(n) _______ by defense counsel
When testifying at trial, the witness for the plaintiff will undergo examination-in-chief by the plaintiff's attorney, and cross-examination by defense counsel.
Examination-in-chief is the initial questioning of a witness by the lawyer who called that witness to testify. During this questioning, the witness provides evidence to support the plaintiff's case.
Cross-examination is the questioning of a witness by the opposing party's lawyer after the witness has completed the examination-in-chief. During cross-examination, the opposing lawyer will ask questions aimed at testing the witness's testimony, challenging the witness's credibility, and undermining the plaintiff's case.
Learn more about Cross-examination here:
https://brainly.com/question/399157
#SPJ4
T/F A person may not testify as an expert unless he has prior experience working with the particular item, matter, or product involved in the litigation.
A person is ineligible to testify as an expert unless he has past expertise handling the specific thing, subject, or product at issue in the lawsuit. This statement is false.
While prior experience with the particular item, matter, or product involved in the litigation may be a relevant factor in determining whether a person can testify as an expert, it is not an absolute requirement.
The Federal Rules of Evidence, as well as many state rules, provide guidelines for the admissibility of expert testimony. Under these rules, a person may qualify as an expert witness if he or she has "knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education" that will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or determining a fact at issue.
The specific requirements for expert testimony may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case. For example, in some cases, the court may require that the expert have a certain level of education or certification in a particular field. However, prior experience with the specific item or matter at issue is not necessarily a prerequisite for qualifying as an expert witness.
To learn more about lawsuit
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
77) Under the five critical factors "Thrives in a culture where people feel comfortable and empowered by having many degrees of freedom" is related to which factor?A) PersonnelB) DynamismC) SizeD) Culture
The factor “Thrives in a culture where people feel comfortable and empowered by having many degrees of freedom” is closely related to the factor of Culture. Culture can be defined as a shared set of beliefs, values, and norms that guide the behavior of individuals and organizations.
A culture with many degrees of freedom allows individuals to feel empowered and comfortable in their work environment. This, in turn, allows them to be more creative and productive, as they are not constrained by too many rules and regulations.
An organization with a culture that fosters many degrees of freedom also enables the organization to adapt to changing customer needs and demands. This flexibility can help the organization stay competitive and ahead of its competitors.
Furthermore, a culture that values creativity and innovation can help attract and retain talented employees, which can ultimately lead to higher customer satisfaction and better business outcomes.
Know more about organization here
https://brainly.com/question/13278945#
#SPJ11
If OC expert is requiring pre-payment of depo fee, DFC prepays and then sends us the invoice, correct?
Answer:
calculate it by self and know
Answer: There are certain situations where a deposit is required from either buyer or seller. In such cases, you may issue a prepayment invoice, sometimes called a prepaid invoice.
A prepayment invoice is a document used to record advance payments from suppliers or clients. It contains the amount to be prepaid on a sales order and enables you to invoice deposits required from clients or sellers.
Prepayments can be calculated based either on the percentage of the total order or have a fixed amount.
Explanation:
Check all of the true details about firemen in F451.
In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, firemen are responsible for starting fires, rather than putting them out.
The novel F451 is set in a dystopian society where books are banned and burned, and firemen are employed to carry out these burnings. The protagonist, Guy Montag, is a fireman who becomes disillusioned with the society he lives in and begins to question the actions of his fellow firemen.
Firemen in F451 are highly trained and well-organized, with their activities supervised by a central authority. They are equipped with a mechanical hound, a robotic device designed to track down and apprehend anyone who is suspected of having books in their possession. The firemen are seen as loyal servants of the state, but Montag's growing dissent exposes the corruption and oppression at the heart of their regime.
In conclusion, firemen in Fahrenheit 451 are not the traditional heroes we are accustomed to, but rather enforcers of a repressive regime that seeks to suppress free thought and expression. Their actions symbolize the dangers of censorship and the importance of intellectual freedom.
Learn more about Fahrenheit 451 here
https://brainly.com/question/14455990
#SPJ4
When playing soccer, two players go for the ball at the same time. Player A misses the ball and kicks Player B, whose leg is broken. If B sues A for negligence, A's defense will likely be:a. privilegeb. defense of property c. consentd. self-defensee. all of the other choices may be defenses
When playing soccer, the likelihood of players going for the ball at the same time is high. In the scenario presented, Player A misses the ball and ends up kicking Player B, causing a broken leg. If B sues A for negligence, A's defense will likely be the defense of property.
The defense of property is a defense that allows a person to use reasonable force to protect their property from harm or damage. In this case, Player A may argue that he was trying to protect the ball, which is his property. Since he missed the ball and accidentally kicked Player B, he may argue that he did not intend to harm B and did not act negligently.
The other choices of privilege, consent, and self-defense are not applicable in this scenario. Privilege refers to a legal justification for an action that would otherwise be considered illegal, such as using force to defend oneself. Consent refers to a person voluntarily agreeing to a particular action, which is not relevant in this case. Self-defense refers to the use of force to protect oneself from harm, which is not applicable in this scenario.
In conclusion, the defense of property is the most likely defense that Player A would use if sued by Player B for negligence in this scenario.
To know more about defense of property visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31212398
#SPJ11
O conveys Blackacre "to the School Board, but if it ceases to use Blackacre for school purposes, O has a right to re-enter."
O conveys Blackacre "to the School Board, but if it ceases to use Blackacre for school purposes, O has a right to re-enter." The School Board has a fee simple subject to condition subsequent; O has a right of entry exempt from the Rule Against Perpetuities.
The rule against perpetuities is a legal rule in the common law that prevents people from using legal instruments to exert control over the ownership of private property for a time long beyond the lives of people living at the time the instrument was written. Specifically, the rule forbids a person from creating future interests in property that would vest beyond 21 years after the lifetimes of those living at the time of creation of the interest, often expressed as a life in being plus twenty-one years.
Thus, the School Board has a fee simple subject to condition subsequent; O has a right of entry exempt from the Rule Against Perpetuities.
Learn more about peretuities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30478467
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. The decision of an association tribunal is binding on both the association member and the consumer.
TRUE, The decision of an association tribunal is binding on both the association member and the consumer. This means that once a decision has been made, it must be adhered to and cannot be appealed unless there are specific grounds for doing so.
The purpose of an association tribunal is to provide an independent and impartial forum for resolving disputes between members of an association and their consumers. The decisions made by these tribunals are legally binding and enforceable by law, so it is important for all parties involved to take them seriously.
Failure to comply with the decision of an association tribunal can result in penalties and legal consequences, so it is important to seek legal advice and follow the correct procedures when involved in a dispute.
To know more about legal advice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28532941
#SPJ11
what is the role 'chair public enquiries and commisions'
The role of the Chair of Public Enquiries and Commissions is to lead the investigation into an issue of public concern.
This could include anything from an inquiry into a tragedy or a review of public policy. The Chair will typically be an independent, impartial person with expertise in the relevant field. They will be responsible for setting the terms of the inquiry, developing the remit, appointing staff and selecting witnesses.
They will also manage the progress of the inquiry, including overseeing hearings, interviews and evidence gathering. The Chair is ultimately responsible for producing a report with conclusions and recommendations. This report will be used to inform decisions and actions to address the issue of public concern. The role of the Chair is therefore vital in ensuring that the inquiry is thorough, fair and transparent.
Know more about public policy here
https://brainly.com/question/30137681#
#SPJ11
Of the following injuries, which meets the definition of "serious bodily injury" as defined in the Texas Penal Code?
Of the following injuries, the one that meets the definition of "serious bodily injury" as defined in the Texas Penal Code would be an injury that causes serious permanent disfigurement or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ.
Serious permanent disfigurement such as severe scarring or the loss of a body part. Impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ such as permanent paralysis or loss of vision in an eye.
It's important to note that the determination of whether an injury meets the definition of "serious bodily injury" is a factual determination that is made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances of the injury.
To know more about serious bodily injury here:
https://brainly.com/question/16945903
#SPJ4
Due to criticism that the proximate cause rule is difficult to understand and apply, some states have replaced it with the:a. fault factor testb. considerable factor test c. substantial factor testd. ultimate cause rulee. none of the other choices
Due to criticism that the proximate cause rule is difficult to understand and apply, some states have replaced it with the: c. substantial factor test
A legal theory known as the proximate cause rule in tort law restricts a defendant's culpability to damages that were reasonably foreseeable as a result of their actions or inactions. However, some states have substituted other standards, including the "substantial factor test," in place of the proximate cause rule due to criticism that it can be challenging to grasp and apply in some situations.
In situations when several circumstances contribute to the injury sustained by a plaintiff, the substantial factor test is a criteria used to establish causation. According to this standard, a defendant may be found accountable if their actions had a significant role in the injury, even if other people or things also played a role. This technique is frequently applied in situations involving complicated or many causes, such as those involving hazardous torts, product responsibility, or environmental contamination.
Read more about tort law on:
https://brainly.com/question/31580458
#SPJ4
You look at a box of cereal in the grocery store and, to your surprise, see your photo on it. You may probably sue for the tort of:a. assaultb. malicious prosecutionc. invasion of privacyd. defamatione. none of the other choices
If your image was put on a cereal box without your permission, we might have a strong case for invasion of privacy.
A multitude of wrongdoings, such as using someone else's name or likeness for profit, are included in the tort known as invasion of privacy. A person's right to privacy may be violated by unauthorized use of their picture or likeness for commercial gain, which may give rise to a lawsuit for damages.
However, whether you have a good case for invasion of privacy in this situation would rely on a number of things, including the specifics of how your photograph was used, the context where it was used, and if you have previously
Hence, the correct option is C.
Learn more about invasion of privacy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2732893
#SPJ4
The ____ Act made certain anti-union actions by management unfair labor practices.Railway LaborWagnerCivil Service Reform
The Wagner Act made certain anti-union actions by management unfair labour practices to protect workers' rights to form and join unions, engage in collective bargaining, and participate in other union activities.
The correct option is C.
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), also known as the Wagner Act, is a federal law that was enacted in 1935. The act created the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), responsible for enforcing the law and resolving disputes between employers and unions.
The Wagner Act also provides for the right of employees to engage in strikes, picketing, and other forms of collective action, as long as these activities are peaceful and do not involve violence or coercion. Additionally, the act prohibits employers from establishing company unions, which are unions controlled by management and not independent organizations representing the interests of workers.
To learn more about Wagner Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30723171
#SPJ4
The tort of emotional distress protects from conduct that goes beyond the bounds of decency, but not from:a. petty insults b. bad languagec. annoying behaviord. all the other specific choices
The tort of emotional distress is a legal concept that protects individuals from severe emotional harm caused by the conduct of others.
This tort provides legal recourse for individuals who have suffered emotional distress due to conduct that goes beyond the bounds of decency. However, it does not protect individuals from petty insults, bad language, or annoying behavior.
The tort of emotional distress requires that the conduct in question is extreme and outrageous, which means that it must be beyond the realm of what is acceptable in society. This means that mere annoyances or trivial matters will not be sufficient to establish a claim for emotional distress.
To establish a claim for emotional distress, the conduct must be so severe and outrageous that it causes a reasonable person to suffer severe emotional distress.
To know more about emotional distress visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14925194
#SPJ11
A landlord, Greg, enters a lease with a tenant, Charlie, for 2 months, beginning on January 1st, 2019 and ending on February 28th, 2019. On February 27th, Charlie dies, leaving the apartment to his son Manny. What rents can Greg receive?
Based on the given case, A landlord, Greg, enters a lease with a tenant, Greg receives a full term of 2 months paid for rent.
A lease is an arrangement to utilize a piece of property for the duration of the terms that are specified. Due to the fact that this is an annual tenancy, neither Charlie nor the lease is terminated by death.
The term "tenant" refers to a person who purchases land or other property from a landowner on a lease or through rent. In the given case, Charlie is a tenant.
After Charlie passes away, Manny receives the lease; all he has to do is make sure the entire two-month term was paid.
Read more about the lease agreement, here:
brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ4
What is the population in Canada likely to experience soon?
A) exponential population growth
B) government institution of a population control policy
C) more senior citizens
D) more single males
E) resource depletion and decreased quality of life
The population in Canada is likely to experience more senior citizens in the near future.
This is because the country is experiencing an aging population due to a decrease in birth rates and increased life expectancy. The proportion of senior citizens is expected to increase significantly, which could have implications for healthcare, retirement benefits, and social welfare programs.
However, Canada has a well-established healthcare system and retirement benefits, which can help mitigate the impact of an aging population. On the other hand, resource depletion and decreased quality of life may also be a concern if proper measures are not taken to manage population growth and resource use.
For more such questions on senior citizens, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29846298
#SPJ11
T devises property "to my grandchildren who reach 21." T leaves two children and three grandchildren under 21.
T devises property "to my grandchildren who reach 21." T leaves two children and three grandchildren under 21. This is valid.
If a person passes away without making a will, or "intestate," then his or her assets will be distributed in accordance with state statutes that are written and explained therein.
The T leaves a will to my grandchildren when they become 21. It is allocated to people above the age of 21 if there are two children and three grandchildren who are under the age of 21. This criterion fulfills the attributes of will-making based on the law.
Learn more about the property, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14285518
#SPJ4
The complete question is probably
T devises property "to my grandchildren who reach 21." T leaves two children and three grandchildren under 21. Is this valid?
O conveys Whiteacre "to A for life, remainder to the heirs of B" B is alive at grant but dies soon after. C is B's heir. What's C get when A dies?
Conveys Whiteacre "to A for life, remainder to the heirs of B" B is alive at grant but dies soon after. C is B's heir. B has no interest whatsoever at the time of conveyance, but A has a possessory life estate.
A, the life tenant, is still living, hence C will obtain an ownership remainder in fee simple upon B's passing. O's reverting will end once the remainder of C vests. A's vested remainder will turn into a possession fee simple absolute upon A's passing.
A has a possessory life estate and B has no interest at all at the time of conveyance. Due to the lack of descendants for live individuals, C will inherit only as B's heir obvious. O keeps a reversion, therefore for C to be considered B's successor, B must live C.
Learn more about a life estate, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29649911
#SPJ4
A tort is:a. a breach of a duty owed to another that causes harm b. a public lawc. designed to criminally punish wrongdoers d. a wrong defined by Congresse. a legal wrong defined by state legislatures
A tort is a legal wrong defined by state legislatures. It refers to a breach of a duty owed to another that causes harm and is a civil, not criminal matter.
The key element of a tort is that it involves a breach of duty owed to another, which causes harm or damages. Examples of torts include negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and product liability. Torts differ from criminal law in that they are not punishable by imprisonment, but rather through monetary damages awarded to the injured party.
Torts can be defined by either state legislatures or through common law, which is based on the legal precedents set by previous court cases. Overall, the concept of tort law aims to hold individuals and entities accountable for their actions and provide a means for those who have suffered harm to seek compensation.
Learn more about state legislatures
https://brainly.com/question/3749822
#SPJ4
Which law gives everybody equal rights and opportunities without discrimination?
The law that gives everybody equal rights and opportunities without discrimination is known as the Equality Act.
The Equality Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of nine protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex.
This law ensures that everyone has the right to equal treatment in areas such as employment, education, housing, and healthcare.
The Equality Act also requires organizations to make reasonable adjustments for individuals with disabilities and to eliminate any barriers that may prevent them from accessing services or employment.
This law is crucial in promoting a fair and inclusive society, where everyone has the opportunity to reach their full potential regardless of their background or circumstances.
The Equality Act is a powerful tool for ensuring that everyone is treated with dignity and respect, and that discrimination is not tolerated in any form.
To know more about Equality Act refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9859216#
#SPJ11
What is report of traffic accident occurring in California SR 1?
Report of traffic accidents occurring in California SR 1 is California State University Maritime Academy's "SR-1 Form" for reporting traffic accidents on California State highways used to document any property damage, injuries, or fatalities resulting from the accident.
The California DMV requires that the SR-1 Form be submitted within 10 days of the accident. This requirement applies to all accidents on a California State highway, regardless of who is at fault. If the accident involves injury, death, or property damage over $1,000, it must be reported using the SR-1 Form.
The SR-1 Form is typically completed by the driver involved in the accident or by their insurance company. It requires detailed information about the accident, such as the date, time, and location, as well as all parties' names and contact information.
To know more about California, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30050163
#SPJ4
Discuss and provide examples of the four main aims of development and education in correctional centres.
To promote equal treatment for all; to guarantee a secure stay and humane treatment for prisoners, their families, and anyone else who comes into contact with them.
Correctional Centers:To educate prisoners about socially acceptable norms and inspire them to change; and to offer them opportunities for self-improvement. It consists of both supervision and instruction delivered to deter future criminal behaviour.
Occasionally the sentence includes the correctional programme. It is required of young offenders. The primary goal of the correctional caseworker is to help criminals adopt the ideals of the community by altering their attitudes and behaviour. As a result, the goal of the social worker is to assist the offender rather than punish him.
To know more about correctional visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31491865
#SPJ1
Negligence is:a. an act that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of careb. an omission that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care c. a willful omission of material information that leads to injuryd. choices a and be. choices a, b and c
Negligence is the failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm or injury to another person, resulting in harm or injury to that person. Negligence can be an act or an omission. The correct answer is (e) choices a, b, and c.
Negligence can be an act that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care, such as driving recklessly and causing an accident. It can also be an omission that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care, such as failing to repair a broken staircase and causing someone to fall. Finally, negligence can be a willful omission of material information that leads to injury, such as a doctor failing to disclose a patient's allergies before prescribing medication.
Learn more about Negligence
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
# SPJ4
O gives property to A, B, C as joint tenancy. C gives interest to D. Then B dies intestate with H as sole heir. D files for partition. If a physical partition is impossible, how should the property be apportioned?
If a physical partition of the property is impossible, the court may order a sale of the property and distribute the proceeds equally among the co-owners.
Property refers to any physical or virtual item that is owned or controlled by an individual or entity and can be legally classified as either real property or personal property. The property can be subject to various laws and regulations governing ownership, transfer, and use.
In legal terms, property can be further defined as a bundle of rights, including the right to possess, use, sell, rent, or transfer the property, as well as the right to exclude others from doing the same.
Learn more about property here:
https://brainly.com/question/13050595
#SPJ4
why does it make judges not effective because they are more likely to rule in favour of the government
Judges who are appointed by the government can be less effective as they may be less likely to rule in favour of the citizen or the public interest.
This is because they may be seen to be biased in favour of the government, and the government may expect them to rule in their favour. Furthermore, the judges may be more prone to loyalty to the government that appointed them, rather than to the law.
This can lead to the judges being less impartial and more likely to ignore legal precedent or the law. In addition, the influence of the government on the judiciary can lead to a lack of judicial independence, meaning that the judiciary cannot act objectively and impartially. This can result in the public feeling less confidence in the judicial system, which can lead to a lack of respect for the law.
Know more about legal precedent here
https://brainly.com/question/29618654#
#SPJ11
O conveys Blackacre "to the School Board so long as it is used for a school, then to A and her heirs."
Q: Is the interest valid?
O conveys Blackacre to the School Board so long as it is used for a school then to A and her heirs. This violates the Rule Against Perpetuities.
O conveys Blackacre to the School Board so long as it is used for a school executes interest violates the Rule Against Perpetuities. It will not necessarily vest within A's Teome or within 21 years after A's death it may vest and become possessory centuries from now. When an interest vicates the Rule Against Perpetuities it is struck out and the remaining valid interests stand. Take a pencil and line out the void gift, then to A and her hers.
This leaves a fee simple determinable in the School Board Since 0 has not given away as entire test, O has a possibility of reverter.
Learn more about perpetuity, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30478467
#SPJ4
Reckless or outrageous conduct that creates severe mental torment may be the tort of:a. battery b. libelc. slanderd. invasion of privacy e. emotional distress
Emotional distress(option e), also known as mental anguish, is a type of tort that involves intentional or reckless conduct that causes severe emotional or mental distress to the victim. This can include behavior such as stalking, harassment, or extreme bullying.
The conduct must be so extreme and outrageous that it goes beyond what is acceptable in society and causes severe mental torment to the victim. Battery, libel, slander, and invasion of privacy are all different types of torts that involve harm to a person's physical or reputational interests, rather than their mental or emotional well-being.
Battery is the intentional harmful or offensive contact with another person, while libel and slander involve false statements made about a person that harm their reputation. Invasion of privacy involves the unauthorized use or disclosure of a person's private information or affairs.
Overall, emotional distress is a serious issue that can have long-lasting effects on a person's mental health and well-being. Victims of emotional distress may be able to seek compensation through a civil lawsuit against the individual or entity responsible for their suffering.
To know more about Emotional distress visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13948475
#SPJ11
For rent payments of $500 a month, L leases Greenacre "to T for the duration of the war."
(a) What estate does T have?
(b) What difference does it make?
For rent payments of $500 a month, L leases Greenacre "to T for the duration of the war. The effect that will create is that the court held the leasehold as a tenancy at will. The difference it makes is death terminates a tenancy but other leasehold estates can be terminated by either party.
Given rent payments of $500 a month, L leases Greenacre "to T for the duration of the war. The effect will be if there is no end date, the leasehold is not a term of years, and since there is no rolling lease, the leasehold is not a periodic tenancy. Therefore the court held the leasehold as a tenancy at will.
Death does terminate a tenancy at will, but not the other leasehold estates and no notice is required for a tenancy at will because it is terminable by either party.
Learn more about rents, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26268428
#SPJ4
Under FRE 702, expert must meet five requirements to be admissible:
Under FRE 702, an expert witness must have specialized knowledge, assist the trier of fact, base their testimony on reliable methods and principles, reliably apply those methods, and base their testimony on sufficient facts or data.
Under FRE 702 (Federal Rules of Evidence), an expert witness must meet five requirements to be admissible. These requirements are as follows:
The expert must have specialized knowledge or skill in a relevant field that is based on education, training, or experience.The expert's testimony must assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or determining a fact in issue.The expert's testimony must be based on reliable methods and principles.The expert must have reliably applied those methods and principles to the facts of the case.The expert's testimony must be based on sufficient facts or data and must be the product of reliable principles and methods.These requirements ensure that the expert's testimony is relevant, reliable, and helpful to the trier of fact in reaching a just decision.Learn more about Federal Rules of Evidence)
https://brainly.com/question/28592086
#SPJ4
