Let f, g : R → R and suppose that f(2) = −3, g(2) = 4, f′(2) = −2, f′(8) = 2 and g′(2) = 7. Determine h′(2) if h is defined as follows:


(a) h(x) = 5f(x) − 4g(x)

(b) h(x) = f(x)g(x)

(c) h(x) = f(x)/g(x)

(d) h(x) = xf(x)g(x)

(e) h(x) = g(x)/(x + f(x))

(f) h(x) ={square root} 4 + 3g(x)
(g) h(x) = f(xg(x))

Answer:

y = 3x - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

here slope m = 3 , then

y = 3x + c ← is the partial equation

to find c substitute (3, 7 ) into the partial equation

7 = 3(3) + c = 9 + c ( subtract 9 from both sides )

- 2 = c

y = 3x - 2 ← equation of line

According to the information, the order of the ribbons from the lowest to the highest would be: 1.73, 2.23, 3.13, 3.46

To find the root of a number we can use different methods such as:

According to the above information, the results of the roots would be:

1.73 = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

2.23 = [tex]\sqrt{5}[/tex]

3.13 = π

3.46 = [tex]2\sqrt{3}[/tex]

So the order from lowest to highest of the ribbons according to their value would be:

1.73, 2.23, 3.13, 3.46

Learn more about roots in: https://brainly.com/question/16932620

#SPJ1

Answer:

w = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

(3.2 + 3.3 + 3.5)w = w , that is

10w = w ( subtract w from both sides )

9w = 0 , then

w = 0

As h approaches 0, the limit becomes: e(²+0) = e²
The answer is D, e².

The given expression is lim(h→0) (e(2+h) - e²)/h. To find the limit, we can apply L'Hopital's Rule since we have an indeterminate form of the type 0/0. L'Hopital's Rule states that if lim(f(x)/g(x)) as x→a is indeterminate, then it is equal to lim(f'(x)/g'(x)) as x→a, provided the limit exists.

Here, f(h) = e^(²+h) - e^² and g(h) = h. Let's find their derivatives:

f'(h) = d(e(²+h) - e^²)/dh = e^(²+h)
g'(h) = dh/dh = 1

Now, applying L'Hopital's Rule:

lim(h→0) (e(²+h) - e²)/h = lim(h→0) (e²+h))/1

As h approaches 0, the limit becomes:

e(²+0) = e²

So, the answer is D, e².

learn more about limh→0 (e^(2+h) - e2)/h

brainly.com/question/30969111

#SPJ11

The correct option is (d) (0.137, 0.363). The 90% confidence interval for proportion p is about (0.137, 0.363).

The formula for a confidence interval for a population proportion:

                                      [tex]\hat{p}\±z_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\hat{p}\frac{(1-\hat{p})}{n} }[/tex]

where [tex]$\hat{p}$[/tex] is the sample proportion, n is the sample size, and [tex]$z_{\alpha/2}$[/tex] is the critical value from the standard normal distribution for the desired confidence level as per the formula.

Then by substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]$\hat{p}$[/tex] = 10/40 = 0.25

n = 40

And for a 90% confidence interval,

                                              [tex]$\alpha[/tex] = 1 - 0.90  

                                              [tex]$\alpha[/tex] = 0.10

and the critical values are ±1.645

By substituting these values, we will get:

                                   [tex]0.25 ± 1.645\sqrt{\frac{0.25(1-0.25)}{40} }[/tex]

After simplifying this expression we get  (0.137, 0.363).

Therefore, the correct answer is (d) (0.137, 0.363).

To know  more about Confidence interval:

brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

The projection of u onto v is approximately 5.244i + 4.195j, and the vector component of u orthogonal to v is approximately -2.244i + 2.805j.

To find the projection of u onto v and the vector component of u orthogonal to v, we'll need to use the formulas for projection and orthogonal components. Let's start with part (a):

(a) To find the projection of u onto v, we'll use the formula:

proj(u onto v) = (u • v / ||v||²) * v

where u = 3i + 7j, v = 5i + 4j, and "•" represents the dot product.

First, let's find the dot product of u and v:
u • v = (3 * 5) + (7 * 4) = 15 + 28 = 43

Next, find the squared magnitude of v:
||v||² = (5² + 4²) = 25 + 16 = 41

Now, divide the dot product by the squared magnitude:
43 / 41 ≈ 1.0488

Finally, multiply this value by the vector v:
proj(u onto v) ≈ 1.0488 * (5i + 4j) ≈ 5.244i + 4.195j

Now let's move to part (b):

(b) To find the vector component of u orthogonal to v, we'll use the formula:

u_orthogonal = u - proj(u onto v)

We've already calculated proj(u onto v) as 5.244i + 4.195j. Now we just need to subtract this from the original vector u:

u_orthogonal = (3i + 7j) - (5.244i + 4.195j) ≈ (-2.244i) + 2.805j

So,The projection of u onto v is approximately 5.244i + 4.195j, and the vector component of u orthogonal to v is approximately -2.244i + 2.805j.

To know more about orthogonal vector, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2292926

#SPJ11

The  function  [tex]Q(t)=8^t^/^3[/tex]  is exponential and values of a is 1 and b is  [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

Yes, the function [tex]Q(t)=8^t^/^3[/tex] is exponential.

We can write it in the form [tex]f(t) = ab^t[/tex],

where: a = Q(0) = [tex]8^(^0^/^3^)[/tex]

= 8⁰

= 1

b = [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

Therefore, the function Q(t) in the form of [tex]f(t) = ab^t[/tex],is:

f(t) = 1 × [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)^t[/tex]

[tex]f(t) = 8^(^t^/^3^)[/tex]

So, values a = 1 and b = [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

Hence, the given function  [tex]Q(t)=8^t^/^3[/tex]  is exponential and values of a is 1 and b is  [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

To learn more on Functions click:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ4

Is the function Q(t) = 8^(t/3) exponential?

If yes, write the function in the form of f(t)=ab^t and enter the values of a and b

The particle's position at time t=0 is 3/2.

That velocity-time is the derivative of the position function, so I thought I could find the anti-derivative of v(t)

and used the given position to solve for the integration constant and then would have a formula of the position which would allow for me to solve for the t=0.

x(t)=∫sin(2t)dt

=−1/2 * cos(2t)+C

So,

time, t = π/2 ; x = 4

4 = −1/2cos(2[π/2])+C

4 = -1/2 * cos π + C

4 =  -1/2 * (-1) + C

C= 4−1/2

= 5/2

Now, put C = 5/2 to find particle position at time, t=0:

x(t) = −1/2 * cos(2t)+C

= −1/2 * cos(2(0)) + 5/2

= -1/2 + 5/2

= 3/2

Hence,  the particle's position at time t=0 is 3/2.

To know more about time check below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29610095

#SPJ1

This value is approximately equal to -0.726. To use the sequence of partial sums to prove convergence, we need to find the limit of the sequence of partial sums. The partial sum for the first n terms of the series is:

Sn = Ση=4n 5/n2-31

We want to show that this sequence of partial sums converges to some limit L. To do this, we can use the fact that the series is absolutely convergent. This means that the series of absolute values converges, which implies that the series itself converges. We can see that the series of absolute values is:

Ση=4n |5/n2-31|

Since all terms are positive, we can drop the absolute value signs:

Ση=4n 5/n2-31

Now, we can use the comparison test to show that this series converges. We know that:

5/n2-31 < 5/n2

Therefore, we can compare our series to the series:

Ση=1∞ 5/n2

which we know converges by the p-test. Since the terms of our series are smaller than the terms of the convergent series, our series must also converge.

Now that we have shown that the series converges, we can find its limit L by taking the limit of the sequence of partial sums. That is:

lim n→∞ Ση=4n 5/n2-31 = L

We can use the fact that the series is absolutely convergent to rearrange the terms of the series:

Ση=4n 5/n2-31 = Ση=1n 5/η2-31 - Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31

The second series on the right-hand side is a convergent series, so it must have a finite sum. Therefore, as n approaches infinity, the sum of the first series on the right-hand side approaches the sum of the entire series:

lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31 = L + Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31

Solving for L, we get:

L = lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31 - Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31

Since we know that the second series on the right-hand side has a finite sum, we can evaluate it:

Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31 = 5/1-31 + 5/4-31 + 5/9-31 + ...

This is a convergent p-series with p=2, so we can evaluate it using the formula:

Ση=1∞ 1/η2 = π2/6

Substituting this value into our expression for L, we get:

L = lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31 - π2/6

We can evaluate the limit using the integral test:

∫1∞ 5/x2-31 dx = lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31

This integral evaluates to:

lim t→∞ 5/sqrt(31)(arctan(sqrt(31)/t) - arctan(sqrt(31)))

= 5/sqrt(31) * π/2

Therefore, our final answer is:

L = 5/sqrt(31) * π/2 - π2/6

Note that this value is approximately equal to -0.726.

Learn more about partial here:

https://brainly.com/question/31495179

#SPJ11

The arithmetic mean of this data set is: 69.88
The median of this data set is: 68.2
The mode of this data set is: 84.7

To calculate the mean, median, and mode of the given data set, follow these steps:

1. Arrange the data set in ascending order: 49.5, 56.6, 57.1, 63.8, 68.2, 69.8, 73.4, 84.7, 84.7, 84.7

2. Calculate the mean by adding all the numbers and dividing by the total count:
(49.5+56.6+57.1+63.8+68.2+69.8+73.4+84.7+84.7+84.7) / 10 = 692.5 / 10 = 69.25
Mean = 69.25

3. Calculate the median by finding the middle value(s) of the ordered data set. In this case, there are 10 numbers, so we will take the average of the two middle values (5th and 6th):
(68.2 + 69.8) / 2 = 138 / 2 = 69
Median = 69

4. Calculate the mode by identifying the number(s) that appear most frequently. In this case, 84.7 appears three times:
Mode = 84.7

Your answer: The mean of the data set is 69.25, the median is 69, and the mode is 84.7.

learn more about arithmetic mean

https://brainly.com/question/13000783

#SPJ11

The probability that exactly 4 out of 6 people chosen at random favor the highway reconstruction project is 0.0154, or about 1.54%.

To solve this problem, we can use the binomial distribution formula:
P(X = k) = (n choose k) × [tex]p^k[/tex] × [tex](1-p)^{(n-k)}[/tex]
Where:
- X is the number of people who favor the highway reconstruction project (in this case, k = 4)
- n is the total number of people chosen at random (in this case, n = 6)
- p is the probability of an individual favoring the highway reconstruction project (in this case, p = 0.20)
Plugging in the values, we get:
P(X = 4) = (6 choose 4) × [tex]0.20^4[/tex] × [tex](1-0.20)^{(6-4)}[/tex]
P(X = 4) = (15) × 0.0016 × 0.64
P(X = 4) = 0.0154

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/25790854

#SPJ11

The problem statement as written does not have a solution.

Let the total number of incoming freshmen be [tex]$n$[/tex]. When they are lined up in columns of 23, we know that [tex]$n$[/tex] is one less than a multiple of 23 since there are 22 people in the last column. Therefore, we can write:

[tex]$$n=23 a-1$$[/tex]

for some integer a Similarly, when they are lined up in columns of 21 , we know that n is two less than a multiple of 21 since there are 14 people in the last column. Therefore, we can write:

[tex]$$n=21 b-2$$[/tex]

for some integer b.

We want to solve for n. One approach is to use modular arithmetic. We can rewrite the first equation as:

[tex]$$n+1 \equiv 0(\bmod 23)$$[/tex]

which means that [tex]$n+1$[/tex] is a multiple of 23. Similarly, we can rewrite the second equation as:

[tex]$n+2 \equiv 0(\bmod 21)$[/tex]

which means that n+2 is a multiple of 21 .

We can use these congruences to eliminate n and solve for the unknown integers a and b. Subtracting the second congruence from the first, we get:

[tex]$$n+1-(n+2) \equiv 0(\bmod 23)-(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

which simplifies to:

[tex]$$-1 \equiv 2(\bmod 23)-(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

or equivalently:

[tex]$$-1 \equiv 2(\bmod 2)$$[/tex]

This is a contradiction, so there is no solution in integers. Therefore, something must be wrong with the problem statement.

One possibility is that there is a typo and the number of people in the last column of the lineup of 23 should be 21 instead of 22. In that case, we would have:

[tex]$$n=23 a-2$$[/tex]

and

[tex]$$n=21 b-7$$[/tex]

Using modular arithmetic as before, we get:

[tex]$$n+2 \equiv 0(\bmod 23)$$[/tex]

and

[tex]$$n+7 \equiv 0(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

Subtracting the second congruence from the first, we get:

[tex]$$n+2-(n+7) \equiv 0(\bmod 23)-(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

which simplifies to:

[tex]$$-5 \equiv 2(\bmod 2)$$[/tex]

This is another contradiction, so this possibility is also not valid.

Therefore, the problem statement as written does not have a solution.

To learn more about arithmetic visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11559160

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Law of Cosines

c^2 = a^2 + b^2  - 2 ab cosΦ

for this example   c = 8     a = 16     b = 17    Φ= Angle C

  you are trying to solve for Angle C

8^2 = 16^2 + 17^2 - 2 (16)(17) cos C

-481 = -2 (16)(17) cos C

.88419 = cos C

arccos ( .884190 ) = C = 27.8 degrees

To answer this question, we will use the concepts of mean number and standard deviation in the context of a binomial distribution. In this case, the number of trials (n) is 65, and the probability of success (learning to push the lever) is 0.70.

(a) Find the mean number of rats that will learn to push the lever:

Mean (µ) = n * p
Mean (µ) = 65 * 0.70
Mean (µ) = 45.5

So, on average, 45.5 rats will learn to push the lever.

(b) Find the standard deviation of the number of rats that will learn to push the lever:

Standard Deviation (σ) = √(n * p * q)
Where q is the probability of failure (1 - p)

In this case, q = 1 - 0.70 = 0.30

Standard Deviation (σ) = √(65 * 0.70 * 0.30)
Standard Deviation (σ) = √(13.65)
Standard Deviation (σ) ≈ 3.69

The standard deviation of the number of rats that will learn to push the lever is approximately 3.69 (rounded to two decimal places).

To learn more about standard deviation : brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ11

There are no specific values of x for which the rate of change is minimum.

function, in mathematics, an expression, rule, or law that defines a relationship between one variable (the independent variable) and another variable (the dependent variable). Functions are ubiquitous in mathematics and are essential for formulating physical relationships in the sciences.

To find the value(s) of x for which the rate of change of the function f(x) = 3.75 - 5.7 + 50 - 7 is minimum, first, we need to simplify the function:

f(x) = 3.75 - 5.7 + 50 - 7
f(x) = -1.95 + 43
f(x) = 41.05

Since the function f(x) is a constant function, its rate of change is always 0, and it does not have a minimum or maximum value.

Know more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/21145944

#SPJ11

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are: var1 = 26.476 var2 = 27.524 ,  Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are: var1 = 33.538 ,var2 = 35.333 , Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are: var1 = 27.381, var2 = 30.833 , The data will tend to be more tightly clustered around it, resulting in a smaller variance.

To compute the variance estimates for Data Set A using the definitional formula provided:

a) Using the sample mean for Data Set A:

First, we need to calculate the sample mean for each column of the data set:

x1 = (23 + 13 + 13 + 7 + 9 + 19 + 11 + 19 + 15 + 14 + 17 + 21 + 21 + 17) / 14

  = 15.14

x2 = (19 + 7 + 19 + 19 + 14 + 21 + 17) / 7

  = 16.43

Using these sample means, we can calculate the variance of each column using the definitional formula:

var1 = [tex][(23-15.14)^2 + (13-15.14)^2 + ... + (21-15.14)^2] / 13[/tex]

    = 26.48

var2 =[tex][(19-16.43)^2 + (7-16.43)^2 + ... + (17-16.43)^2] / 6[/tex]

    = 27.52

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are:

var1 = 26.476

var2 = 27.524

b) Using a mean score of 15:

Using a mean score of 15, we can calculate the variance of each column using the same formula as in part (a), but with the mean score of 15 substituted for the sample mean:

var1 = [tex][(23-15)^2 + (13-15)^2 + ... + (21-15)^2] / 13[/tex]

    = 33.54

var2 = [tex][(19-15)^2 + (7-15)^2 + ... + (17-15)^2] / 6[/tex]

    = 35.33

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are:

var1 = 33.538

var2 = 35.333

c) Using a mean score of 16:

Using a mean score of 16, we can calculate the variance of each column using the same formula as in part (b), but with the mean score of 16 substituted for 15:

var1 = [tex][(23-16)^2 + (13-16)^2 + ... + (21-16)^2] / 13[/tex]

    = 27.38

var2 = [tex][(19-16)^2 + (7-16)^2 + ... + (17-16)^2] / 6[/tex]

    = 30.83

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are:

var1 = 27.381

var2 = 30.833

d) Conclusions:

The variance estimates are sensitive to the choice of mean score used in the calculations. In general, the variance estimates will be larger when a mean score that is lower than the sample mean is used, and smaller when a mean score that is higher than the sample mean is used. This is because the variance measures the spread of the data around the mean, and if the mean is shifted higher, the data will tend to be more tightly clustered around it, resulting in a smaller variance. Similarly, if the mean is shifted lower, the data will tend to be more spread out, resulting in a larger variance.

Learn more about sample mean,

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

To find the expected value of a random variable, we multiply each possible value of the variable by its probability and then add up the products.
So, the expected value of X can be calculated as:
E(X) = (0)(0.5) + (1)(0.2) + (2)(0.3)
    = 0 + 0.2 + 0.6
    = 0.8
Therefore, the answer is c. 0.80.

Learn more about Expected Value here:

https://brainly.com/question/31581872

#SPJ11

The number of hose is multiplied by 8 to get the number of gallons

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The table of values

The constant, k of the ratio is calculated as

k = y/x

So, we have

k = 80/10 = 40/5.....

Evaluate

k = 8

This means that the relationship is a multiplicative relationship because the number of hose is multiplied by 8 to get the number of gallons

Hence, the true statement is (c)

Read more about ratio a

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ1

The correct answer is C. The distribution is negatively skewed.

In a boxplot, the box represents the interquartile range (IQR), which contains the middle 50% of the data. The median (m) is represented by a vertical line inside the box. The whiskers extend from the box to the smallest and largest observations within 1.5 times the IQR of the box. Any observations beyond the whiskers are considered outliers.

In this boxplot, the median (m) is closer to the bottom whisker than to the top whisker, which suggests that the distribution is negatively skewed. Additionally, the box appears to be longer on the left side than on the right side, which further supports the conclusion that the distribution is negatively skewed. Therefore, the correct answer is C. The distribution is negatively skewed.

To learn more about negatively visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14719138

#SPJ11

The expression "-3x² + 3x²" simplifies to 0, so the given function can be rewritten as: f(x) = -x - 1.

To find the first derivative of f(x), we use the power rule and the constant multiple rule of differentiation: f'(x) = -1. The first derivative of f(x) is simply -1, which means that the slope of the tangent line to the graph of f(x) is constant and equal to -1 for all values of x.

To find the second derivative of f(x), we differentiate the first derivative:

f''(x) = 0. The second derivative of f(x) is 0, which means that the graph of f(x) is a straight line with a constant slope of -1, and it has no curvature or inflection points.

When we graph f(x), f'(x), and f''(x) using a graphing calculator or software, we can see that the graph of f(x) is a straight line with a negative slope of -1, as expected. The graph of f'(x) is a horizontal line at y = -1, which confirms that the slope of f(x) is constant. The graph of f''(x) is a horizontal line at y = 0, which confirms that f(x) has no curvature or inflection points.

The analysis of the first and second derivatives of f(x) reveals that the function is a straight line with a constant negative slope, and it has no curvature or inflection points.

Learn more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ4

As n approaches infinity, -72n^2 also approaches infinity. The natural logarithm of infinity is also infinity. Therefore, the limit of the sequence diverges: lim(n→∞) c_n = ∞ Your answer: DIV

To determine the limit or divergence of the sequence c_n = ln(4n - 7)/(6n + 4), we can use the limit laws and theorems of calculus.

First, we can simplify the expression inside the natural logarithm by factoring out 4n from the numerator and denominator:

c_n = ln(4n(1 - 7/(4n)))/(2(3n + 2))
c_n = ln(4n) + ln(1 - 7/(4n)) - ln(2) - ln(3n + 2)

Next, we can use the fact that ln(x) is a continuous function to take the limit inside the natural logarithm:

lim n→∞ ln(4n) = ln(lim n→∞ 4n) = ln(infinity) = infinity

lim n→∞ ln(2) = ln(2)

Using the theorem that the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, we can add the last two terms together and simplify:

lim n→∞ c_n = infinity - ln(2) - lim n→∞ ln(3n + 2)/(6n + 4)

Finally, we can use L'Hopital's Rule to evaluate the limit of the natural logarithm fraction:

lim n→∞ ln(3n + 2)/(6n + 4) = lim n→∞ (1/(3n + 2))/(6/(6n + 4))
= lim n→∞ (2/(18n + 12)) = 0

Therefore, the limit of c_n as n approaches infinity is:

lim n→∞ c_n = infinity - ln(2) - 0 = infinity

Since the limit of the sequence is infinity, the sequence diverges. Therefore, the answer is DIV.
Let's determine the limit of the sequence or show that it diverges using the appropriate Limit Laws or theorems.

Given sequence: c_n = ln(4n - 76n + 4)

We need to find: lim(n→∞) c_n

Step 1: Rewrite the sequence
c_n = ln(4n - 76n + 4)

Step 2: Factor out the highest power of n in the argument of the natural logarithm
c_n = ln(n^2 (4/n - 76 + 4/n^2))

Step 3: Calculate the limits of each term in the parentheses as n→∞
lim(n→∞) 4/n = 0
lim(n→∞) 4/n^2 = 0

Step 4: Replace the terms with their limits
c_n = ln(n^2 (4 - 76 + 0))

Step 5: Simplify the expression
c_n = ln(-72n^2)

As n approaches infinity, -72n^2 also approaches infinity. The natural logarithm of infinity is also infinity. Therefore, the limit of the sequence diverges:

lim(n→∞) c_n = ∞

Your answer: DIV

Learn more about L'Hopital's Rule here: brainly.com/question/29480665

#SPJ11

The limit of the sequence cn as n approaches infinity is ln(2/3).

We can use the limit laws to determine the limit of the sequence cn = ln(4n -7)/(6n + 4) as n approaches infinity.

First, we can simplify the expression inside the natural logarithm by dividing both the numerator and denominator by n:

cn = ln((4n/n) - (7/n))/((6n/n) + (4/n))

cn = ln(4 - 7/n)/(6 + 4/n)

As n approaches infinity, both 7/n and 4/n approach zero, so we have:

cn = ln(4 - 0)/(6 + 0)

cn = ln(4/6)

cn = ln(2/3)

Therefore, the limit of the sequence cn as n approaches infinity is ln(2/3).

Learn more about limit;

https://brainly.com/question/30679261

#SPJ4

The answer is (C) 0.054. 

Regularly a binomial probability issue, where we are captivated by the probability of getting five left-handers in a course of 93 understudies, given that the probability of an individual being left-handed is 0.15.

The condition for the binomial probability spread is:

P(X = k) = (n select k) * [tex]p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)[/tex]

where:

P(X = k) is the likelihood of getting k triumphs (in our case, k left-handers)

n is the general number of trials (in our case, the degree of the lesson, 93)

p is the probability of triumph on each trial (in our case, the probability of an individual being left-handed, 0.15)

(n select k) is the binomial coefficient, which speaks to the number of ways of choosing k objects from a set of n objects.

Utilizing this condition, able to calculate the probability of finding five left-handers in a lesson of 93 understudies:

P(X = 5) = (93 select 5) * [tex]0.15^5 * (1 - 0.15)^(93 - 5)[/tex]

P(X = 5) = 0.054

Consequently, the answer is (C) 0.054. 

To know more probability refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

Answer:

16.25 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

We Know

Mai's family travels in a car at a constant speed of 65 miles per hour.

How far do they travel in 25 minutes?

25 minutes = 1/4 of an hour

We Take

65 / 4 = 16.25 miles

So, they travel 16.25 miles in 25 minutes.

Answer:

Unit Conversion:

l≈3.35m

w≈0.2m

Solution

P=2(l+w)=2·(3.35+0.2)=7.112m

P=280

Answer: 38 in

Step-by-step explanation:

8+8+(11 x 12) + (11x12)

16 + 132 + 132

280

Based on the mentioned informations and provided values, the value of  the function g'(3a)  is calculate to be equal to 11/21.

We can start by applying the chain rule to find the derivative of g(x) with respect to x:

g'(x) = (1/7) f'(x/3) (1/3)

Note that the factor of 1/3 comes from the chain rule, since we are differentiating with respect to x but the argument of f is x/3.

Next, we can substitute x = 3a to find g'(3a):

g'(3a) = (1/7) f'(3a/3) (1/3)

= (1/7) f'(a) (1/3)

= (1/7) (11) (1/3)

= 11/21

Therefore, g'(3a) = 11/21.

Learn more about function :

https://brainly.com/question/29775037

#SPJ4

Using the three-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get I ≈ 0.0817.

(a) Using the composite trapezoidal rule with n = 1, 2, and 4, we get:
For n = 1: I ≈ (b-a) / 2 [f(a) + f(b)] = 1/2 [0 + 1/4] = 1/8
For n = 2: I ≈ (b-a) / 4 [f(a) + 2f(a+h) + f(b)] = 1/4 [0 + 1/8 + 1/4] = 3/32
For n = 4: I ≈ (b-a) / 8 [f(a) + 2f(a+h) + 2f(a+2h) + 2f(a+3h) + f(b)] = 1/8 [0 + 1/8 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/4] = 11/64

(b) Using Romberg extrapolation twice, we get:
R(1,1) = 1/8, R(2,1) = 3/32, R(4,1) = 11/64
R(2,2) = [4R(2,1) - R(1,1)] / [4 - 1] = 7/64
R(4,2) = [4R(4,1) - R(2,1)] / [4 - 1] = 59/256
So, the more accurate estimate of the integral using Romberg extrapolation twice is R(4,2) = 59/256.

(c) Using the two-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get:
I ≈ (b-a) / 2 [f((a+b)/2 - (b-a)/(2sqrt(3))) + f((a+b)/2 + (b-a)/(2sqrt(3)))]
= 1/2 [0.0728 + 0.1456] = 0.1092

(d) Using the three-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get:
I ≈ (b-a) / 2 [5/9 f((a+b)/2 - (b-a)/(2sqrt(15))) + 8/9 f((a+b)/2) + 5/9 f((a+b)/2 + (b-a)/(2sqrt(15)))]
= 1/2 [0.0146 + 0.1343 + 0.0146] = 0.0817

Therefore, using the composite trapezoidal rule, we get I ≈ 11/64. Using Romberg extrapolation twice, we get a more accurate estimate of I ≈ 59/256. Using the two-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get I ≈ 0.1092. Using the three-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get I ≈ 0.0817.

To learn more about integral, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

On solving the query we can say that Answer: 33%, rounded to the function closest full number. D. 33% is the answer that is closest to the real one.

Mathematics is concerned with numbers and their variations, equations and related structures, shapes and their places, and possible placements for them. The relationship between a collection of inputs, each of which has an associated output, is referred to as a "function". An relationship between inputs and outputs, where each input yields a single, distinct output, is called a function. Each function has a domain and a codomain, often known as a scope. The letter f is frequently used to represent functions (x). X is the input. The four main types of functions that are offered are on functions, one-to-one functions, many-to-one functions, within functions, and on functions.

The basketball squad has a total of 15 players, which is equal to 3 + 5 + 3 + 4.

There are five sophomores.

We may use the following formula to get the team's proportion of sophomores:

(Part/Whole) x 100 equals %

In this instance, the "part" is the quantity of sophomores, which is 5, and the "whole" is the overall player count, which is 15. Thus:

% = (5/15) multiplied by 100 percent equals 33.33

Answer: 33%, rounded to the closest full number. D. 33% is the answer that is closest to the real one.

To know more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ1

The total amount in Bob and Ann's retirement account after 12 years will be approximately $64,022.79.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for continuous compounding:

[tex]A = Pe^{(rt)[/tex]

where A is the final amount, P is the principal amount, e is the base of the natural logarithm, r is the annual interest rate, and t is the time in years.

In this case, we have P = $3000, r = 0.098, and t = 12. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

[tex]A = 3000 * e^{(0.098 * 12)[/tex]≈ $64,022.79

Therefore, after 12 years, Bob and Ann will have approximately $64,022.79 in their retirement account if they deposit $3000 per year and the account pays interest at a rate of 9.8% compounded continuously.

To know more about  retirement account, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1813704#
#SPJ11

The implications of this analysis for the advertising agency are the advertising agency should strive to create commercials that appeal to both men and women, taking into account the differences in their television viewing habits. The option (c) is correct.

To test the manager's claim that there is a significant gender difference in television viewing, we need to conduct a t-test for independent means. The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the amount of television watched between men and women, while the alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference.

The t-test for independent means gives us a t-value of -2.44, which is significant at the .05 level. This means that we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant gender difference in television viewing.

In terms of implications for the advertising agency, it would be wise to consider the differences in television viewing habits between men and women when creating commercials. Based on the data, women watch more television on average than men, so the agency may want to tailor their commercials more towards the interests and needs of women. This does not mean that men should be ignored entirely, as they still make up a significant portion of the viewing audience.

Learn more about advertising here:

https://brainly.com/question/29564877

#SPJ4