If y varies directly as x, and y is 48 when x is 6, which expression can be used to find the value of y when x is 2?

Answer: 3. 4[tex]\sqrt{13}[/tex]            4. [tex]\sqrt{225}[/tex]    

Step-by-step explanation:

8^2 + 12^3 = c^2

64 + 144 = c^2

208 = c^2

√208

[tex]4\sqrt{13}[/tex]

The final answer is the square root of 208

8^2 + b^2 = 17^2

64 + b^2 = 289

-64               64

   b^2 = 225

[tex]\sqrt{225}[/tex]

Answer:

The amount of heat lost by the aluminum is 31,500 J

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

mass of aluminum, m =  500 g

initial temperature of the aluminum, θ₁ = 100° C

final temperature of the aluminum, θ₂ = 30°C

specific heat capacity of water, C = 4.18 J/g °C

specific heat capacity of aluminum , C = 0.90 J/g

Heat lost by the aluminum is equal to heat gained by the water.

The amount of heat lost by the aluminum, is calculated as;

Q = MCΔθ

Q = 500 x 0.9 (100 - 30)

Q = 500 x 0.9 x 70

Q = 31,500 J

Therefore, the amount of heat lost by the aluminum is 31,500 J

Answer:

The resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to subtract [tex](x+1)^{2}[/tex] from [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex]

so, we start by performing the multiplication involved in the perfect square of the binomial [tex](x+1)[/tex], and obtain its expression in separate terms that can be combined:

[tex](x+1)^{2}=(x+1)\,(x+1)=x^2+x+x+1=x^2+2x+1[/tex]

Now we can subtract this trinomial from  [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex], and  combining like terms to get the resultant polynomial expression:

[tex]7x^2-4x+6-(x^2+2x+1)=7x^2-4x+6-x^2-2x-1=7x^2-x^2-4x-2x+6-1=6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Then the resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Answer:

All the elements in the sample share a common characteristic. All of them read the magazine, so we may have a biased sample. And we also have the bias of the fact that only the volunteers will respond to this survey, so this is a biased sample.

This type of sample is usually called convenience sampling, where the elements in the sample are the most readily available (and what is most readily available for a magazine than its own readers?)

Then the type of sample is a convenience sample and a biased sample.

Answer:

  $3.75

Step-by-step explanation:

I = Prt

I = $500·0.03·(3/12) = $3.75

The early-withdrawal fee is $3.75 for the first quarter.

_____

Each quarter after that, the principal amount will be larger, so the interest penalty will be larger. The fee would be the amount of interest that would be credited at the end of the next quarter, or at the end of the quarter currently in progress.

Answer:

14.69% probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 28, \sigma = 7.6[/tex]

What is the probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 20. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{20 - 28}{7.6}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.05[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.05[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.1469

14.69% probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

Answer:

a) The CDF of X/Y is calculated as:

[tex]F_{z} (\zeta) = \frac{\zeta}{\zeta + 2}[/tex] for [tex]0 < \zeta < \infty[/tex]  

[tex]F_{z} (\zeta) = 0[/tex] for [tex]\zeta \leq 0[/tex]

Note: Z = X/Y

b) Probability that A finishes before B = 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

For clarity and easiness of expression, this solution is handwritten and attached as a file. Check the complete solution in the attached file.

Answer is 5 calories/min

75 divided by 15 is 5

Answer:five cal per min.15 in five groups equals ''75''

Answer:

157.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Use PEMDAS! In this rule, it is stated that we should always add/subtract before multiplying/dividing. Also, whatever you do on one side of an equation, you do to another. Therefore, in order to get rid of the -2/5, add 2/5 so we can get rid of it. We also (according to the rule), have to add it to the other side in order to balance out. So add the 2/5 to 39. Then the other side is now 39.4. Now we have to get x by itself. Divide both sides by 1/4 (or multiply by 4 on both sides) in order to get x=157.6

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it would have less weight to carry

Answer

About 219-220

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: $219.047619

Step-by-step explanation: 1150.00 ÷ 5.25 = 219.047619

Answer:

y = 1/4x + (any number)

Step-by-step explanation:

m = -8/2 = -4, the equation shown is y = -4x + 8

perpendicular is  y = 1/4x + (any number), you didn't say where the line was perpendicular.

Answer:

The ratio of the expenses shared by Akmal to Bakri to Cadin is 7 : 4 : 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The 3 of them shares their mother medical expenses which cost RM4200 . There mother medical expenses is RM4200 in total. Cadin pays RM2100 which is half of their mother medical expenses. Then Akmal pays three quarters of Bakri amount.

Let

The amount Bakri pays = a

Akmal pays = 3/4 of a

Akmal pays = 3/4a

Therefore,

a + 3a/4 = 2100

4a + 3a/ 4 = 2100

7a/4 = 2100

cross multiply

7a = 8400

divide both sides by 7

a = 8400/7

a = 1200

Therefore,

Bakri pays =RM 1200

Akmal pays = 3/4 × 1200 =RM 900

The ratio of the expenses shared by AKmal to Bakri to Cadin is expressed as 2100 : 1200 : 900. Divide through by 300

7 : 4 : 3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Rational numbers are the result of dividing two integers. Intergers cannot be fractions. So 1.5 is rational but 3/2 is not.

Five rational numbers: 1.5, 6, 24.7, 384, 404.4, 1,980

I'm always happy to help :)

Answer:

Quedan 2.083 m^3 de agua en el reservorio.

Equivalen a 2083 litros.

Step-by-step explanation:

Los dueños del restaurante tienen un reservorio de agua cuyo volumen es de 6.25 m^3.

Si han utilizado 2/3 del reservorio, esto implica que aún quedan en el reservorio una tercera parte del volumen original (1/3).

Entonces, la cantidad de metros cúbicos (m^3) de agua que quedan en el reservorio se puede calcular como:

[tex]V=(1/3)\cdot V_0=(1/3)\cdot6.25\,m^3=2.083\,m^3[/tex]

Este valor equivale a un volumen en litros de:

[tex]V=2.083\,m^3\cdot \dfrac{1,000\,l}{1m^3}=2,083\,l[/tex]

Answer:

[tex] m =\frac{y_2 -y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

Where x for this case represent the time and y the height waist off ground.

We have one point that can be extracted from the graph on this case:

[tex] x_1 = 1, y_1= 3[/tex]

Bout for the other point we have:

[tex] x_2 = 5.3 , y_2 = 9.6[/tex]

Is important to notice that 9.6 is an estimation since we don't have the scale to identify the real value. so then if we replace we got:

[tex] m =\frac{9.6-3}{5.3-1}= 1.535[/tex]

And for this case we can conclude that this slope is positive and around 1.5 and 1.6. And that means if we increase the time in one unit then the height off waist off ground would increae about 1.5 to 1.6 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to calculate the slope we need to use the following formula:

[tex] m =\frac{y_2 -y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

Where x for this case represent the time and y the height waist off ground.

We have one point that can be extracted from the graph on this case:

[tex] x_1 = 1, y_1= 3[/tex]

Bout for the other point we have:

[tex] x_2 = 5.3 , y_2 = 9.6[/tex]

Is important to notice that 9.6 is an estimation since we don't have the scale to identify the real value. so then if we replace we got:

[tex] m =\frac{9.6-3}{5.3-1}= 1.535[/tex]

And for this case we can conclude that this slope is positive and around 1.5 and 1.6. And that means if we increase the time in one unit then the height off waist off ground would increae about 1.5 to 1.6 ft

Answer:

a) 13913

b) 4913.82

Step-by-step explanation:

The compound interest formula is given by:

[tex]A(t) = P(1 + \frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Where A(t) is the amount of money after t years, P is the principal(the initial sum of money), r is the interest rate(as a decimal value), n is the number of times that interest is compounded per year and t is the time in years for which the money is invested or borrowed.

In this question:

Investment of 9000, so [tex]P = 9000[/tex]

Interest rate of 8%, so [tex]r = 0.08[/tex]

Compounded quarterly, so [tex]n = 4[/tex]

5 years and 6 months, that is, 5 years and half, so [tex]t = 5.5[/tex]

(a) How much would the value of her savings at the end of the term?

[tex]A(t) = P(1 + \frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

[tex]A(5.5) = 9000(1 + \frac{0.08}{4})^{4*5.5} = 13913.82[/tex]

(b) How much is the interest earned by your savings?

The amount subtracted by the principal. So

13913.82 - 9000 = 4913.82

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

If these lines are parallel, they should have the same slope. How so? Well slope is the change in axis, y / x more specifically. If the lines are parallel they should change at a similar rate so that they don't intersect, and hence are, by definition, ║;

[tex]Green Line's Slope = Red Line's Slope,\\8 = Red Line's Slope,\\Red Line's Slope = 8 units\\\\Solution - Option D[/tex]

Hope that helps!

Answer:

2044

Step-by-step explanation:

just follow the story

a person uses a

hanger (2)

to pop a

ball  (0)

then flies

two kites (44)

Answer:

1). 2044

Step-by-step explanation:

The story includes: a hanger, a ball, and two kites (in that order)

From the information given, a hanger is 2, a ball is 0, and a kite is 4.

So it would be 2044.

Answer:

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to claim that there is a significant relationship between x and y.

P-value = 0.003.

Step-by-step explanation:

If we perform a regression analysis relating x and y, we get the best fitting line with equation:

[tex]y=15.82x+92.9[/tex]

and a correlation coefficient r:

[tex]r=0.693[/tex]

We have to test the hypothesis, where the alternative hypothesis claims that there is a relationship between these two variables, and the null hypothesis claiming there is no relationship (meaning that the correlation is not significantly different from 0).

This can be written as:

[tex]H_0: \rho=0\\\\H_a:\rho\neq0[/tex]

where ρ is the population correlation coefficient for x and y.

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample size is n=16.

The degrees of freedom are df=14.

[tex]df=n-2=16-2=14[/tex]

The test statistic can be calculated as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{r\sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}=\dfrac{0.693\sqrt{14}}{\sqrt{1-(0.693)^2}}=\dfrac{2.593}{0.721}=3.597[/tex]

For a test statistic t=2.05 and 14 degrees of freedom, the P-value is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>3.597)=0.003[/tex]

The P-value (0.003) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant enough.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to claim that there is a significant relationship between x and y.

Answer:

y = 1/2x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope intercept form is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

When we count rise over run, we find that the slope is 1/2

y = 1/2x + b

The line intersects the y-axis at 4, so the y-intercept is 4.

y = 1/2x + 4

I hope this helps :))

Here is the full question:

When a species has several variants of a phenotype passed on from generation to generation, we can form a hypothesis about the genetics of the trait based on Mendelian theories of genetic inheritance. For example, in a two-gene dominant epistatic model, the first gene masks the effect of the second gene, leading to the expression of three phenotype variants. Crossing the dominant and recessive homozygote lines would result in a second generation represented by a mix of dominant, intermediate, and recessive phenotype variants in the expected proportions: and respectively, also called a 12:3: 1 ratio.

Such a model can provide the basis for the null hypothesis in a significance test. A cross of white and green summer squash plants gives the number of squash in the second generation F2: 131 white squash, 34 yellow squash, and 10 green squash. Are these data consistent with a 12: 3: 1 dominant epistatic model of genetic inheritance( white being dominant)?

The null hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is                

Answer:

The null  hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is :

[tex]\mathbf{H_o:p_{white} = \frac{12}{16}, p_{yellow} = \frac{3}{16}; p_{green} = \frac{1}{16} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The objective of this question is to state the null hypothesis for the  chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

Given that:

There are three colors associated with this model . i,e White , yellow and green and they are in the ratio of 12:3:1

The total number of these color traits associated with this model = 12 + 3 + 1 = 16

Thus ;

The null  hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is :

[tex]\mathbf{H_o:p_{white} = \frac{12}{16}, p_{yellow} = \frac{3}{16}; p_{green} = \frac{1}{16} }[/tex]

Answer:

37 years difference.

Step-by-step explanation:

K = Kissi

k = Age of Kissi

E = Esinam

e = Age of Esinam

L = Lariba

l = Age of Lariba

k + e + l = 147

K : E

3 : 5 → (×3) → 12 : 15

E : L

3 : 5 → (×5) → 15 : 25

K : E : L

12 : 15 : 25

12 + 15 + 25 = 52

147/52 = 2.8269...

K is the young since out of the three part ratio, 12 is the smallest and likewise, L is the oldest.

k = 12 × 2.8269... = 33.923... → 34 y/o

e = 15 × 2.8269... = 42.40... → 42 y/o

l = 25 × 2.8269... = 70.673... → 71 y/o

∴ The difference between the youngest and oldest is:

71 - 34 = 37

Answer:

Rectangle C is 14 cm longer than B

Step-by-step explanation:

Let  x be the length of Rectangle A. Rectangle B is ¹/₅ longer than A Block B,

Therefore the length of rectangle B is:

[tex]x+\frac{1}{5}x[/tex]

Rectangle C is ¹/₃ longer than B, therefore the length of rectangle c is:

[tex]x+\frac{1}{5}x+\frac{1}{3}(x+\frac{1}{5}x) =x+ \frac{1}{5}x+\frac{1}{3}x+\frac{1}{15}x=x+\frac{9}{15}x[/tex]

The total length of all three rectangles is 133 cm.

Length of rectangle A + Length of rectangle B + Length of rectangle C = 133 cm

[tex]x+x+\frac{1}{5}x +x+\frac{9}{15}x=133\\x+x+x+\frac{1}{5}x +\frac{9}{15}x=133\\3x+\frac{12}{15}x=133\\ 45x+12x=1995\\57x=1995\\x=35cm[/tex]

Therefore the length of rectangle A is 35 cm, the length of rectangle B is [tex]35+\frac{1}{5}*35=42\ cm[/tex] and the length of rectangle C is [tex]35+\frac{9}{15}*35=56\ cm[/tex]

Rectangle C is ¹/₃ longer than B, which is 14 cm (42\3) longer than B

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between:

10 and 4: 1.492

10 and 20: 2.055

13 and 4: 2.577

13 and 20: 2.226

The R code:

#Convert your datafile into csv and make sure your row names are 10,13,4 and 20

data=read.csv(file.choose())

data

row.names(data)=c(10,13,4,20)

data

d=dist(data,method="euclidean")

d

fit=hclust(d,method="complete")

plot(fit)

groups=cutree(fit,k=2)

rect.hclust(fit,k=2,border="red")

Answer:

368

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

.86602 a

.707106 b

.577355 c

Step-by-step explanation:

entered itno calculator

Answer:

A. Schaid draws a white sock and a green sock. It did not talk about no green sock

Step-by-step explanation: