I need help with question 5 find m

The function f(x) = 3√(2x) + 3 is concave down on the interval (0, +∞).

To determine the intervals where the function is concave up or concave down, we need to find the second derivative of the function and analyze its sign. The given function is f(x) = 3√(2x) + 3.

First, let's find the first derivative, f'(x):
[tex]f'(x) = \frac{d(3\sqrt{2x} + 3)}{dx} = 3 \cdot \frac{d(\sqrt{2x})}{dx} = 3 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot (2x)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \cdot 2 = 3 \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2x}}[/tex]

Now, let's find the second derivative, f''(x):
[tex]f''(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\left(3 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2x}}\right)\right) = -3 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot (2x)^{-\frac{3}{2}} \cdot 2 = -3 \cdot \frac{1}{2(2x)^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
Now, we need to analyze the sign of f''(x):

f''(x) is concave up when f''(x) > 0, which does not happen in this case.

f''(x) is concave down when f''(x) < 0, which occurs for all x > 0.

Thus, the function f(x) = 3√(2x) + 3 is concave down on the interval (0, +∞).

To learn more about function here:

brainly.com/question/13320130#

#SPJ11

The midline of the graph is y = -3

The midline of a graph is a horizontal line that divides the graph into two equal parts. It is used in various fields such as mathematics, physics, and economics to represent the average or equilibrium value of a function or data set.

midline = (highest point + lowest point) / 2

midline = (2 + -8) / 2

midline = (2 - 8) / 2

midline = -6 / 2

midline = -3

Therefore, the midline of the attached graph is at y = -3.

If the graph is not symmetrical, the midline may not accurately represent the average or equilibrium value.

Learn more about midline at

https://brainly.com/question/30242629

#SPJ1

Answer:

the difference quotient of f(x) = 2x^2 + x - 3 is:

(f(x + h) - f(x))/h = (4x + 2h - 1) + (2/h), where h is not equal to zero.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the difference quotient of f(x) = 2x^2 + x - 3, we need to evaluate the expression (f(x + h) - f(x))/h, where h is not equal to zero.

f(x + h) = 2(x + h)^2 + (x + h) - 3 = 2x^2 + (4h + 1)x + 2h^2 - h - 1

f(x) = 2x^2 + x - 3

Therefore,

f(x + h) - f(x) = (2x^2 + (4h + 1)x + 2h^2 - h - 1) - (2x^2 + x - 3)

= 4hx + 2h^2 - h + 2

Dividing by h, we get:

(f(x + h) - f(x))/h = (4x + 2h - 1) + (2/h)

As h approaches 0, the second term (2/h) approaches infinity, so the difference quotient is not defined at h = 0.

Therefore, the difference quotient of f(x) = 2x^2 + x - 3 is:

(f(x + h) - f(x))/h = (4x + 2h - 1) + (2/h), where h is not equal to zero.

The point estimate used to build this confidence interval is 7.

Given is a confidence interval: (4, 10), we need to find the point estimate used to build this confidence interval,

The two ends of the confidence interval are both at same distance away from.

Knowing this we can find the point that is directly in-between these points.

4 + 10 / 2 = 14 / 2 = 7

Hence, the point estimate used to build this confidence interval is 7.

Learn more about point estimate, click;

https://brainly.com/question/30057704

#SPJ4

The area under the curve to the right of 64 is 0.2514.

To find the area under the curve to the right of 64 in a normal distribution with mean μ = 60 and standard deviation σ = 6, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the z-score: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x = 64.
  z = (64 - 60) / 6
  z = 4 / 6
  z ≈ 0.67

2. Use a z-table or calculator to find the area to the left of z = 0.67.
  The area to the left of z = 0.67 is approximately 0.7486.

3. Subtract the area to the left from 1 to find the area to the right of z = 0.67.
  Area to the right = 1 - 0.7486
  Area to the right ≈ 0.2514

So, the area under the curve to the right of 64 in this normal distribution is approximately 0.2514.

Know more about area here:

https://brainly.com/question/15122151

#SPJ11

The value of the integral is:
∫[(36 – x2)^(5/2)]dx = -9/2 [(1 - x^2/36)^(5/2)] + C.

To evaluate the integral [(36 – x2)5/2dx, we can use the substitution method. Let u = 36 - x^2, then du/dx = -2x dx, and dx = -du/(2x).
Substituting, we have:
∫[(36 – x^2)^(5/2)]dx = ∫u^(5/2) (-du/(2x))
= (-1/2) ∫u^(5/2)/x du
Now, we need to express x in terms of u. From the original substitution, we have:
u = 36 - x^2
x^2 = 36 - u
x = ±(36 - u)^(1/2)
We will use the positive root for simplicity. Substituting, we have:
x = (36 - u)^(1/2)
Now, we can express x in terms of u and substitute back into the integral:
∫[(36 – x^2)^(5/2)]dx = (-1/2) ∫u^(5/2)/[(36 - u)^(1/2)] du
To evaluate this integral, we can use a trigonometric substitution. Let u = 36 sin^2 θ, then du/dθ = 72 sin θ cos θ dθ, and du = 36(2 sin θ cos θ) dθ = 18 sin 2θ dθ.
Substituting, we have:
∫u^(5/2)/[(36 - u)^(1/2)] du = ∫[(36 sin^2 θ)^(5/2)]/[(36 cos^2 θ)^(1/2)] (18 sin 2θ) dθ
= 18 ∫[sin^5 θ]/cos θ dθ
We can use the substitution v = cos θ, then dv/dθ = -sin θ, and sin θ = ±(1 - v^2)^(1/2). We will use the positive root for simplicity. Substituting, we have:
sin^5 θ = (1 - v^2)^(5/2)
dθ = -dv/(1 - v^2)^(1/2)
Substituting back into the integral, we have:
∫[sin^5 θ]/cos θ dθ = -∫(1 - v^2)^(3/2) dv
= (1/2) (1 - v^2)^(5/2) + C
Substituting back u = 36 sin^2 θ and v = cos θ, we have:
∫[(36 – x^2)^(5/2)]dx = (-1/2) 18 [(1/2) (1 - cos^2 θ)^(5/2)] + C
= -9/2 [(1 - cos^2 θ)^(5/2)] + C
= -9/2 [(1 - (1 - u/36))^(5/2)] + C
= -9/2 [(u/36)^(5/2)] + C
Finally, substituting u = 36 - x^2, we have:
∫[(36 – x^2)^(5/2)]dx = -9/2 [(36 - x^2)/36]^(5/2) + C
= -9/2 [(1 - x^2/36)^(5/2)] + C

Learn more about substitution method here:

https://brainly.com/question/14619835

#SPJ11

Simplify, [tex]3x \times 2y+5y[/tex]

Using order of operations, PEMDAS

[tex]P = > Parenthesis\\E= > Exponents \\M > Multiplication\\D= > Division\\A= > Addition\\S= > Subtraction[/tex]

[tex]\Longrightarrow 3x \times 2y+5y \Longrightarrow (3x \times 2y)+5y \Longrightarrow(6xy)+5y \Longrightarrow \boxed{6xy+5y}[/tex]

Thus, 6xy+5y is the correct simplified form.

Answer:

[tex]x + 2 = - 3x[/tex]

[tex] - 4x = 2[/tex]

[tex]x = - \frac{1}{2} [/tex]

[tex] - 3( - \frac{1}{2} ) = \frac{3}{2} = 1 \frac{1}{2} [/tex]

So the lines intersect at (-1/2, 1 1/2), or

(-.5, 1.5).

The probability that the sample mean x will be greater than 11 is approximately 9.01%.

To find the probability that the sample mean (x) will be greater than 11 given a sample size of 45 drawn from a population with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 5, follow these steps:

Step 1: Calculate the standard error (SE) of the sample mean.

The standard error is given by the formula:

SE = population standard deviation / √sample size.

In this case, SE = 5 / √45 ≈ 0.745.

Step 2: Calculate the z-score corresponding to the given value of x.

The z-score is given by the formula:

z = (x - population mean) / SE.

In this case, z = (11 - 10) / 0.745 ≈ 1.34.

Step 3: Use the z-score to find the probability that x will be greater than 11.

The probability can be found using a standard normal (z) table or a calculator.

A z-score of 1.34 corresponds to a probability of approximately 0.0901 (9.01%).

Learn more about probability:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The confidence interval for the given population is [7.68, 14.77], under the condition that standard deviation  of a random sample of 25 men who have a mean weight of 170.4 pounds

Constructing a 95% confidence interval for the given population
The standard deviation σ of a random sample of 25 men who have a mean weight of 170.4 pounds with a standard deviation of 10.3 pounds,
Then,
Confidence interval = [√ (n-1)s² /[tex]X^{2a/2}[/tex], √ (n-1)s² /[tex]X^{21-a/2}[/tex]]

here:
n= sample size
s²= sample variance
[tex]X^{2a/2}[/tex] = chi-square value with α/2 degrees of freedom
[tex]X^{21-a/2}[/tex] = chi-square value with 1-α/2 degrees of freedom

Now for a 95% confidence interval,
α = 0.05
n = 24 degrees of freedom.

Applying a chi-square distribution table, we can find that [tex]X^{20.025}[/tex] = 38.58 and [tex]X^{20.975}[/tex] = 11.07.

Staging  the values we have:

Confidence interval = [√ (24)(10.3)² /38.58, √ (24)(10.3)² /11.07]
= [7.68, 14.77]

Hence, we can say with 95% confidence that the population standard deviation σ lies between 7.68 and 14.77 pounds.

To learn more about confidence interval
https://brainly.com/question/20309162
#SPJ4

The value of sin 2Ф is  (√3 )/ 2 ,  cos 2Ф is 1/2 and tan 2Ф is √3 by application of Trigonometric formulas of Sine, Cosine and Tangent.

We have, sin Ф= 1/2

Applying Trigonometric formulas of Sine, Cosine and Tangent, we get

We know,

sin² Ф + cos² Ф = 1

⇒ (1/2)² + cos² Ф = 1

⇒ cos² Ф = 1 - (1/4) = 3/4

Rooting both sides we get,

⇒ cos Ф = (√3 )/ 2

Therefore, sin 2Ф = 2{sin Ф} {cos Ф}

⇒ sin 2Ф = 2 (1/2){(√3 )/ 2}

= (√3 )/ 2

Therefore, cos 2Ф = 2{ cos² Ф} - 1

⇒ cos 2Ф = 2 ( 3/4) - 1

= 1/2

Therefore, tan 2Ф = [tex]\frac{sin (theta)}{cos(theta)}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1/2}{(\sqrt{3} )/ 2}[/tex] = 1/ (√3 )

So, tan 2Ф = [tex]\frac{2 tan (theta)}{ 1 - tan^{2} (theta) }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{2(1/\sqrt{3}) }{1 - (1/\sqrt{3})^{2} }[/tex] = √3

To know more about Trigonometric formulas here

https://brainly.com/question/29154811

#SPJ1

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the mean mortgage amount in

2016 is greater than that of 2015: Ha: µ2 > µ1

Hypothesis testing involves setting up a null hypothesis (H0) and an

alternative hypothesis (Ha) to test whether there is significant evidence

to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is no significant

difference between two populations or samples being compared, while

the alternative hypothesis is the opposite of the null hypothesis.

In this case, we want to test whether the mean mortgage amount in

2016  is greater than that of 2015. Let us denote the population mean of

mortgage amounts in 2015 as µ1 and the population mean of mortgage

amounts in 2016 as µ2.

The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no significant difference in the

mean mortgage amounts between the two populations:

H0: µ2 ≤ µ1

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the mean mortgage amount in

2016 is greater than that of 2015:

Ha: µ2 > µ1

We will use a one-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05 (5%) since

we are interested in testing whether the mean mortgage amount in 2016

is greater than that of 2015. that since the standard deviations of both

populations are known, we can use a z-test to compare the means.

for such more question on  hypothesis

https://brainly.com/question/24029881

#SPJ11

The rate of change in temperature being recorded by the weather balloon at time t = 1 is 1°C per hour.

I understand that you have a question about atmospheric temperature and its dependence on position and time. I'll address each part of your question using the provided terms.

(a) In the context of atmospheric temperature, the expressions x, y, z, and t represent the position and time variables. Specifically, x, y, and z are the spatial coordinates (measured in kilometres) that denote the position in 3D space, and t (measured in hours) denotes the time variable.

(b) According to the given function, T(x, y, z, t) = 1.(1+t), and the position of the weather balloon is represented by x = 1, y = 2t, and z = 1. To find the temperature as a function of t only, substitute these values into the temperature function:

T(1, 2t, 1, t) = 1.(1+t)

(c) To find the rate of change of the temperature being recorded by the weather balloon at t = 1, we first differentiate the temperature function T(t) with respect to time t:

dT/dt = d(1.(1+t))/dt = 1

Now, evaluate the rate of change at t = 1:

dT/dt |_(t=1) = 1

So, the rate of change in temperature being recorded by the weather balloon at time t = 1 is 1°C per hour.

To learn more about function, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

It is $4 much cheaper to make cabinets from 151 feet of cedar than from 150 feet.

For 150 feet of cedar, the cost of making cabinets is $6.00 per foot, so the total cost would be:

150 feet x $6.00/foot = $900

For 151 feet of cedar or more, the cost of making cabinets is $4.00 per foot. So, the cost of making cabinets for 151 feet of cedar would be:

(151 feet - 150 feet) x $4.00/foot + $900 = $4 + $900 = $904

The difference in cost between making cabinets from 151 feet of cedar and 150 feet of cedar is:

$900 - $904 = -$4

Therefore, it is $4 more expensive to make cabinets from 151 feet of cedar than from 150 feet.

Learn more about difference here:

https://brainly.com/question/25433540

#SPJ1

The integral values are:

1) x^4/4 - x^10/60.

2) x - x^3/18 + x^5/600.

We have,

For both problems, we can use Taylor series expansions to approximate the integrands to the desired degree of accuracy.

Then we integrate the Taylor series term by term to obtain a polynomial approximation for the integral.

We have:

sin t³ = t³ - (1/3!) t^9 + (1/5!) t^15 - ...

Using only the first two terms, we get:

sin t³ ≈ t³ - (1/3!) t^9

Integrating from 0 to x, we get:

f(x) ≈ ∫(0 to x) t^3 - (1/3!) t^9 dt

= x^4/4 - x^10/60

The error is bounded by the absolute value of the next term in the Taylor series, which is (1/5!) x^15.

Since 1/5! is less than 10^-3, this error is smaller than 10^-3 throughout the interval [0, 1].

Therefore, the answer is x^4/4 - x^10/60.

We have:

sin t/t = 1 - (1/3!) t² + (1/5!) t^4 - ...

Using only the first two terms, we get:

sin t/t ≈ 1 - (1/3!) t²

Integrating from 0 to x, we get:

f(x) ≈ ∫(0 to x) (1 - (1/3!) t²) dt

= x - x³/18

The error is bounded by the absolute value of the next term in the Taylor series, which is (1/5!) x^4.

Since 1/5! is less than 10^-3, this error is smaller than 10^-3 throughout the interval [0, 1].

Therefore, the answer is (b) x - x^3/18 + x^5/600.

Thus,

1) x^4/4 - x^10/60.

2) x - x^3/18 + x^5/600.

Learn more about polynomials here:

https://brainly.com/question/2284746

#SPJ11

The two lines are neither parallel nor perpendicular. Therefore, the answer is C. Neither.

The ratio of the change in the y-coordinate to the change in the x-coordinate between any two points on the line is known as the slope, and it is a measure of an equation's steepness.

Compare the slopes of each equation;

The slope-intercept form of a line is y = mx + b, where m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept.

Let's rewrite the two given equations in slope-intercept form:

equation 1:   5x - y = 7

-y = -5x + 7

y = 5x - 7         (here Slope = 5)

equation 2:   2x - 10y = 20

-10y = -2x + 20

y = 0.2x - 2      (here Slope = 0.2)

A. If the slopes of two lines are equal it means the lines are parallel. Since 5 is not equal to 0.2, the two lines are not parallel.

B. Two lines are perpendicular if and only if the product of their slopes is -1.
Their product is 5 × 0.2 = 1, which is not equal to -1.
Therefore, the two lines are not perpendicular.

Therefore, the answer is C. Neither.

To know more about Slope, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16949303
#SPJ1

The expression sinâ¹(â3/2) is undefined. The value of cosâ¹(2/2) = 0 radians.

In the expression sinâ¹(â3/2), Since the sine function is only defined for angles between -π/2 and π/2, we cannot find an angle with a sine of -â3/2. Therefore, the expression is undefined.

In the expression cosâ¹(2/2), since the cosine of an angle is equal to the adjacent side over the hypotenuse in a right triangle, we can draw a right triangle with adjacent side 2 and hypotenuse 2. Using the Pythagorean theorem, we find that the opposite side has length 0.

Therefore, we have a right triangle with adjacent side 2, opposite side 0, and hypotenuse 2. This means that the angle we are looking for is a zero-degree angle, or 0 radians. Therefore, cosâ¹(2/2) = 0 radians.

To know more about sine function:

https://brainly.com/question/12015707

#SPJ4

Based on the ANOVA results with a P value of 0.12, it can be concluded that the study has failed to show a significant difference among means of age groups, but the existence of a difference cannot be ruled out. Therefore, option b is the correct conclusion.

It is not correct to conclude that the mean rate of progression does not differ among age groups (option a), or that if a difference among age groups exists, then it is probably small (option c). Additionally, it is not possible to conclude that a larger sample size would have detected a significant difference among age groups (option d).
From the given information, we can conclude the following statements:
b. The study has failed to show a difference among means of age groups, but the existence of a difference cannot be ruled out.
c. If a difference among age groups exists, then it is probably small.

To learn more about ANOVA : brainly.com/question/30763604

#SPJ11

To minimize the amount of tin used, the height of the can must be 4 inches (option D).

The volume of a cylindrical tin can is given by the formula V = πr²h, where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height. To minimize the amount of tin used, we need to minimize the surface area, which is given by the formula A = 2πrh + 2πr².

Given the volume is 16π cubic inches, we have:

16π = πr²h

Now, we can find the relationship between r and h:

h = 16/r²

Now, substitute this into the surface area formula:

A = 2πr(16/r²) + 2πr²
A = 32π/r + 2πr²

To minimize the surface area, we can take the derivative with respect to r and set it to 0:

dA/dr = -32π/r² + 4πr

0 = -32π/r² + 4πr

Solving for r:

r³ = 8
r = 2 (since r > 0)

Now, substituting r back into the relationship between r and h:

h = 16/(2²)
h = 16/4
h = 4

Therefore, the height of the can must be 4 inches (option D) to minimize the amount of tin used.

Learn more about minimizing surface area here: https://brainly.com/question/29897121

#SPJ11

The solution to the equation cos θ = 7/16, rounded to the nearest tenth, is θ = 64.05 degrees.

Equations with trigonometric functions that hold true for all of the variables in the equation are known as trigonometric identities.
These identities are used to solve trigonometric equations and simplify trigonometric expressions.

To solve for θ when cos θ = 7/16, we need to use the inverse cosine function (also called the arc-cosine function), which is denoted as cos⁻¹

Using this function, we can write:

cos θ = 7/16

θ = cos⁻¹(7/16)

To find the value of θ in degrees, we can use a calculator or a table of trigonometric values. Using a calculator, we get:

θ = 64.05°

Therefore, the solution to the equation cos θ = 7/16, rounded to the nearest tenth, is θ = 64.05 degrees.

To know more about trigonometric functions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25618616
#SPJ1

No, R is not transitive.
Explanation: A relation R on a set X is considered transitive if, for every pair of elements (x, y) and (y, z) in R, there exists a pair (x, z) in R. In this case, X = {a, b, c, d}, and R = {(a, b), (b, c), (c, a)}.

To show that R is not transitive, we need to find pairs that violate the transitivity condition. We have the pairs (a, b) and (b, c) in R, but we don't have the pair (a, c) in R. Therefore, R is not transitive.

Learn more about it here:

https://brainly.com/question/31581743

#SPJ11

a) The probability P(X < 0.5) is 0.00050625.

b) The probability P(0.4 < X <0.7) is 0.00723502.

c) The expected value of X is and 0.9 the standard deviation of X is 0.2121.

d) The cumulative distribution function of X, F(x) = [tex]9x^{9}-10x^{10}+1[/tex]  for 0 ≤ x ≤ 2.

To show that f(x) is a probability density function, we need to show that it satisfies the following properties,

f(x) is non-negative for all x in the range of X.

The area under the curve of f(x) over the range of X is equal to 1.

a) To find P(X < 0.5), we need to integrate f(x) from 0 to 0.5,

P(X < 0.5) = ∫[0,0.5] f(x) dx

           = ∫[0,0.5] 90[tex]x^{8}[/tex] (1-x) dx

           = 0.00050625

Therefore, the probability that X is less than 0.5 is 0.00050625.

b) To find P(0.4 < X < 0.7), we need to integrate f(x) from 0.4 to 0.7,

P(0.4 < X < 0.7) = ∫[0.4,0.7] f(x) dx

                = ∫[0.4,0.7] 90[tex]x^{8}[/tex] (1-x) dx

                = 0.00723502

Therefore, the probability that X is between 0.4 and 0.7 is 0.00723502.

c) To find the expected value (mean) of X, we need to integrate x*f(x) over the range of X,

E(X) = ∫[0,2] x*f(x) dx

    = ∫[0,2] x*90[tex]x^{8}[/tex] (1-x) dx

    = 0.9

Therefore, the expected value of X is 0.9.

To find the standard deviation of X, we need to calculate the variance first,

Var(X) = E([tex]X^{2}[/tex]) - [tex][E(X)]^{2}[/tex]

We can calculate E([tex]X^{2}[/tex]) by integrating [tex]x^{2}[/tex]*f(x) over the range of X,

E(X^2) = ∫[0,2]  [tex]x^{2}[/tex]*f(x) dx

      = ∫[0,2]  [tex]x^{2}[/tex]*90[tex]x^{8}[/tex] (1-x) dx

      = 0.54

Therefore, the variance of X is,

Var(X) = 0.54 - [tex](0.9)^{2}[/tex]

      = 0.045

And the standard deviation of X is,

SD(X) = [tex]\sqrt{Var(X)}[/tex]

     = 0.2121

d) The cumulative distribution function of X, F(x), is given by,

F(x) = P(X ≤ x) = ∫[0,x] f(t) dt

We can calculate F(x) by integrating f(x) from 0 to x,

F(x) = ∫[0,x] f(t) dt

    = ∫[0,x] 90[tex]t^{8}[/tex] (1-t) dt

    = [tex]9x^{9}-10x^{10}+1[/tex]

To learn more about cumulative distribution function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30657052

#SPJ4

The earthquake in California with a magnitude of 4.9 had an amplitude 7943.28 times stronger than the baseline amplitude Ao.

The formula relating the Richter scale,  magnitude M to the amplitude A of an earthquake is

M = log10(A/Ao)

Solving for A, we get

A = Ao * 10^(M)

For the earthquake in California with a magnitude of 4.9, we can use this formula to find the ratio of its amplitude to the baseline amplitude Ao

4.9 = log10(A/Ao)

10^4.9 = A/Ao

A/Ao = 10^4.9

A/Ao = 7943.28

This means that the wave amplitude A of the earthquake in California was 7943.28 times stronger than the baseline amplitude Ao.

To know more about richter scale:

https://brainly.com/question/4089234

#SPJ4

--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given

"An earthquake in california measured 4. 9 on richter scale use formula r=log(a/ao) to determine how many times stronger the wave amplitude a of the earthquake was than ao."--

The value of x in the tangent intersection is 6.

The measure of the angle between the two tangents is also half the difference between the major and minor arcs between the two points of contact with the tangents.

Therefore, using the tangent intersection theorem, the value of x can be found as follows:

9x + 1 = 1 / 2(235 - (360 - 235))

9x + 1 = 1 / 2 (235 - 125)

9x + 1 = 1 / 2 (110)

9x + 1 = 55

Therefore,

9x = 55 - 1

9x = 54

divide both sides of the equation by 9

x = 54 / 9

x = 6

Learn more on tangent here: brainly.com/question/8827822

#SPJ1

The ratio that the odds used for determining the payoff is 23 : 1 (option d).

The odds used for determining the payoff in this game of chance can be found by dividing the total amount that will be paid out (including the original bet) by the amount of the bet. In this case, the total amount that will be paid out is $115, and the amount of the bet is $5. Therefore, the odds can be calculated as follows:

Odds = Total amount paid out : Amount of bet

Odds = $115 : $5

To simplify this ratio, we can divide both sides by $5:

Odds = $23 : $1

This means that for every $1 bet, the payout will be $23 if the event occurs.

Therefore, the answer to this question is option (d) 23:1.

To know more about ratio here

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ4

The population for this study is all hotel managers in hotels of size 200 to 500 rooms in Chicago and Detroit.

The major shortcomings in the obtained data are the small sample size (only 100 out of 400 managers responded) and the potential for response bias (managers who are more satisfied or dissatisfied with their computer systems may be more likely to respond to the survey).

Confidence interval for a population mean with a known standard deviation:

[tex]CI = \bar x \± z\times (\sigma/\sqrt n)[/tex]

[tex]\bar x[/tex] is the sample mean, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the population standard deviation (assumed to be 1.75), n is the sample size (100), and z is the z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence (95% corresponds to a z-score of 1.96).

Substituting the given values, we have:

[tex]CI = 5.396 \± 1.96\times (1.75/\sqrt 100)[/tex]

[tex]CI = 5.396 \± 0.34[/tex]

[tex]CI = (5.056, 5.736)[/tex]

The 95% confident that the true population mean for satisfaction with ease of use of computer systems for hotel managers in hotels of size 200 to 500 rooms in Chicago and Detroit is between 5.056 and 5.736.

To repeat this survey many times and construct a 95% confidence interval based on each sample, about 95% of the intervals would contain the true population mean for satisfaction with ease of use of computer systems.

The same formula as in part B, but with a z-score of 2.58 (corresponding to 99% confidence), we have:

[tex]CI = 4.398 \± 2.58\times (1.75/\sqrt 100)[/tex]

[tex]CI = 4.398 \± 0.45[/tex]

[tex]CI = (3.948, 4.848)[/tex]

The 99% confident that the true population mean for satisfaction with level of computer training for hotel managers in hotels of size 200 to 500 rooms in Chicago and Detroit is between 3.948 and 4.848.

To repeat this survey many times and construct a 99% confidence interval based on each sample, about 99% of the intervals would contain the true population mean for satisfaction with level of computer training.

For similar questions on population

https://brainly.com/question/25630111

#SPJ11

There will be an average of approximately 43.38 grams of radium in the vault during the next 600 years.

We need to calculate the average amount of radium in the vault during the next 600 years. Given the half-life of radium is 1690 years and the initial amount is 50 grams, we can use the radioactive decay formula:
Final Amount = Initial Amount * (1/2)^(time elapsed/half-life)
After 600 years, the amount of radium left in the vault will be:
Final Amount = 50 * (1/2)^(600/1690)
Final Amount ≈ 50 * (1/2)^0.35503 ≈ 36.75979727 grams
Now, to find the average amount of radium during the 600 years, we can take the average of the initial amount and the final amount:
Average Amount = (Initial Amount + Final Amount) / 2
Average Amount = (50 + 36.75979727) / 2 ≈ 43.37989864 grams
Therefore, there will be an average of approximately 43.38 grams of radium in the vault during the next 600 years.

To learn more about radium, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/9216557

#SPJ11

Answer:

Therefore, the domain of the function r(t) = vt+1i+t-3j is (-∞, ∞).

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the domain of the following vector-valued function, r(t) = vt+1i+t-3j, we need to determine the range of values that t can take. Since t appears in both terms of the function, we need to ensure that both terms are defined for all possible values of t.

The domain of t is typically all real numbers, unless there are specific restrictions given in the problem. In this case, there are no such restrictions, so the domain of t is all real numbers, or (-∞, ∞).

Therefore, the domain of the function r(t) = vt+1i+t-3j is (-∞, ∞).

The solution to the given integral is 26 ln |√6 + in(x)| + C, where C is the constant of integration.

The given integral is ∫ 13 in (x)/ x √6 + in (x))² dx. To evaluate this integral, we need to use the substitution method. We substitute u = √6 + in(x) and obtain du/dx = 1/2x √6 + in(x), which implies dx = 2u/(√6 + in(x)) du.

Substituting these values in the integral, we get:

∫ (13/u²) (2u/(√6 + in(x))) du

Simplifying this expression, we get:

∫ (26/u) du

= 26 ln |u| + C

= 26 ln |√6 + in(x)| + C

To know more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4