The correct answer is D. By making sure that everyone could earn a living
Explanation:
Hongwu was the emperor of China from 1368 to 1398. During this period, Hongwu created multiple policies and introduced important changes mainly inspired by the teachings of Confucius, who promoted morality, justice, and correctness. Due to this, Hongwu created policies against corruption, introduced the idea emperors are designated by divine forces and encouraged the economy by promoting agriculture, reducing taxes, and protecting peasants. This last action created justice for peasants and guaranteed everyone in the empire could contribute to the economy and at the same time earn a living.
How did The Portuguese destroy Kongo during the seventeenth century?
Answer:
The kingdom went into decline from the mid-16th century CE when the Portuguese, put off by the interference of Kongo's regulations on trade, moved their interests further south to the region of Ndongo. The latter kingdom had already defeated a Kongo army in 1556 CE
Explanation:
What were settlement houses and why were they important?
Answer:
they helped settlers and provided them homes
Explanation:
idk, i just think this is the answer
How was Sam Houston able to solve the problem of the unrest in the Texas army after the Texas Revolution?
a.
Houston added the Texas Rangers as a unit in the army.
b.
Houston paid all the veterans and equipped them with better artillery.
c.
Houston reduced the size of the army by sending the soldiers on leave.
d.
Houston increased the requirements that need to be met before anyone can join the army.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think its B.
Explanation:
It may be B because i dont think Sam Houston would do c.Houston reduced the size of the army by sending the soldiers on leave.
d.Houston increased the requirements that need to be met before anyone can join the army. And I don’t think he would do A either i think he would find a way like through B and paid all the veterans and equipped them with better artillery. there wanting to solve the problem and fix the issues between them so paying them and making them feel nice and useful would most likely be best.
The expansion of Islam resulted in European expansion how?
Answer:
The expansion of Islam resulted in European expansion in which of the following ways a. Europeans sought to convert new people to Christianity to counteract Islamic influence. ... Europeans were compelled to search for sea trade routes to Asia to avoid crossing Islamic lands.
Explanation:
What is the meaning of the word “swell”
Answer: to grow, or increase in size
Explanation:
Answer: become larger or rounder in size
Explanation:
what makes the Confederates different from the American colonists
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The major difference between the Confederates and American colonists are:
1. Confederates wants the slavery to continue and rejected the abolishment of Slavery movement, this led to secession and eventually American civil war. While American colonists, rejected the imposition of British taxes, other subsequent trade limitations that were imposed on them, and they also refused to accommodate the British soldiers and as other unfair duies.
2. Confederates had a legal right to secede, as they had agreed and ratified a union constitution that allow any part that wish to secede to do so without the federal government stopping them, while the American colonists had no such legal agreement.
The Confederates different from the American colonists because the Confederates is defined in terms of rebels and the American colonists defines in terms pf patriots.
What are the difference between Confederates and American colonists?(1). The Confederates were also known as the “Rebels” because they desired to break up from the Union government as well as their own government, which was realised as disloyal by the North.
On the another hand, the American colonists were also known as “Patriots” because they desired to acquire independence from Great Britain.
(2). Confederate desires the subjection to proceed and disapproved the termination of Slavery occurrence.
While American colonists, disapproved the enforcement of British taxes, another resulting trade restrictions that were enforced on them.
Therefore, they both are different by their own policies.
Learn more about the Confederates, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11649223
When the British couldn’t control Gandhi, what did they usually do with him?
Answer:
At times he was put in jail/prison and I have read that at other times he was simply ignored. There were several violent movements going on in the Country of India at the time so Gandhi's peaceful movement really didn't draw a lot of attention from the British.
Explanation:
Answer:
he was arrested for writing articles advocating resistance.
Explanation:
Which advantages of immigration does President Obama Name in this passage? Check all that apply
- helped creat new businesses
- helped boost the nations military
- helped shape the character of the country
- has given us benefit ls that other countries do not have
Answer:
According to Obama, immigration helped create new businesses , helped shape the character of the country , and has given us benefits that other countries do not have .
Explanation:
America has historically been a country of immigrants. All American citizens have at least one ancestor whose origin is not native. Thus, millions of people from all over the world have come to these lands, from the first Mayflower immigrants, through the Irish, Germans, Italians, Mexicans, Cubans, Asians, etc.
Each of the immigrant groups has brought their cultures, idiosyncrasies and ways of living to the country and faces the different challenges of destiny. Thus, each of them has started different ways of earning a living, undertaking through investment and work different companies that have developed the country to become the world's leading economic power. Furthermore, through multiculturalism, they have defined the country's heterogeneous character, which today constitutes a melting pot that drives the country to continue developing.
Answer:
ade
Explanation:
Which of the following statements best explains how the failure of several
railroad companies in the 1890s caused a major economic depression that
affected the entire U.S. economy?
A. Railroad workers had unionized earlier than workers in most other
industries. When railroad companies failed, it convinced business
owners to aggressively fight against unions.
B. Railroad companies were the country's largest employers in the
late 19th century. When several of these companies failed, a huge
number of workers were forced to rely on government welfare
programs.
C. Loose regulations on business had allowed only a few railroad
companies to dominate the entire industry. When those
companies failed, the transportation grid in the United States was
paralyzed.
D. Investors, worried about the prospect of losing their money,
withdrew it in huge amounts from banks. This panic led to bank
failures, which made the problem even worse.
Answer:
Investors, worried about the prospect of losing their money,
withdrew it in huge amounts from banks. This panic led to bank
failures, which made the problem even worse.
Explanation:
I got it correct.
Which of the following statements describes a primary difference between democratic and communist governments?
A Only democratic governments distribute land to citizens and make decisions about the economy
B. Only democratic governments have complete control of both the economic and political systems,
COnly communist governments have complete control of both the economic and political systems
D. Only communist governments use popular elections to determine who serves as a government
official
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Communist governments control the economic and political systems of their countries.
Answer:
C. Only communist governments have complete control of both the economic and political systems.
Explanation:
I just did the test in edg
How did World War I contribute to the rise and of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany?
Why was the United States concerned when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990?
O A. They wanted to preserve the Kuwaiti royal family
B. They wanted to protect their interests in Iraqi banks
C. They wanted to protect their investments in oil
D. They wanted to protect their interests in Middle Eastern food
The answer is C, as there was concerns over oil that United States was part of.
The United States was concerned when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990 as They wanted to protect their investments in oil. Thus, option C is correct.
What is invasion?A foreign nation or territory is invaded when someone joins it with the intention of forcibly capturing it or winning it. It might have a military bent or incorporate goals related to politics, the economy, or culture. A single nation or a collection of nations may carry it out.
Iraq attacked Kuwait, a nation southeast of it, in an effort to increase its control over the Middle East's wealthy supply of petroleum. Saddam Hussein was compelled to evacuate Iraqi soldiers from Kuwait upon request by the United States alongside the Security Council of the United Nations, however, Hussein refused.
Therefore, option C is the correct option.
Learn more about invasion, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14449918
#SPJ5
Ashoka described Buddhism in the many inscriptions that he left on
A. trees
B. pillars
C. cave walls
D. manuscripts
- the answer is not A , I’ve failed the test with that answer !-
Answer:
He adopted the teachings of the Buddha known as the Four Noble Truths, they have been found carved into the face of rocks and cave walls as well as the pillars
Explanation:
Why was food production still a leading industry in the Industrial Revolution? Because the south could only focus on agriculture Because food was still a valued commodity Because there were not enough industrial jobs Because people refused to leave the farms for industrial jobs
Answer:
Because was still a valued commodity
Explanation:
Answer:
Because was still a valued commodity
Explanation:
What conclusion about life in the United States during World War II can be drawn from this poster? (7 points)
A. Politicians began actively courting the women's vote for the first time.
B. The government felt the need to encourage women to enter the workforce.
C. Women's rights activists began fighting for women's right to serve in combat roles.
D. Labor unions began to accept women as members for the first time.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Which nations were part of the Triple Alliance?
Austria-Hungary
Britain
France
Germany
the United States
Russia
DONE
What does the table show about how Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1957? Check all that apply. The majority of both parties opposed the bill. More Republicans than Democrats opposed the bill. More Democrats than Republicans opposed the bill. The majority of both parties voted in favor of the bill. All Senate Republicans voted in favor of the bill.
Answer:
More Democrats than Republicans opposed the bill.
The majority of both parties voted in favor of the bill.
All Senate Republicans voted in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was the act passed by the Congress of United States with the purpose of providing more protection to the Civil Rights of people. The law was enacted under the Presidentship of Dwight D. Eisenhower, on 9th September 1957.
The act was passed to involve federals to ensure that the civil rights African Americans and other minorities were being protected.
This Act was mainly opposed by Democrats than Republicans in the Congress, approximately 100 votes from Democrats were in oppose to the bill. Majority of both the parties voted in favor of the Bill and all Senate Republicans were in favor of the Bill, so all of them voted in its favor.
Answer:
More Democrats than Republicans opposed the bill.
The majority of both parties voted in favor of the bill.
All Senate Republicans voted in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
why was the cuban missile crisis so dangerous
Answer:
There were many missle sites being built by the Soviet missles.
Explanation:
Come on; missles are extremely dangerous.
Which statement explains the irony of Harburg's description of the bread line?
Answer:
He was eating and living wellwhile the other people had to stand in bread lines to get food
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
What is a political ideology that emphasized
nationalism, aggressive expansion, racism and violence and lacked any
personal rights.
Answer:
you could say the 'white power' or 'white supremacy' ideology. They are known for their racist beliefs and raging pride in their nationality. Many also believe that they are the superior race.
You could also say fascism for the same reasons but they are commonly a form of government.
During Reconstruction, African Americans gained the freedom to:
A. buy slaves.
B. ignore state laws.
C. attack slaveholders.
D. get an education.
SUBMIT
Answer:
D. get an education.
Explanation:
took the test
am
What was different about FDR's
second New Deal as opposed to
his first New Deal set of
programs?
A. It was pulling back from so much
involvement in the lives of Americans.
B. It was more specific approaches to solutions
and healing the American psyche.
C. It was a comprehensive set socialist programs
designed to increase government.
D. It was a concerted effort to fuel the stock
market.
Answer:
b i think
Explanation:
Answer: B. It was more specific approaches to solutions and healing the American psyche.
Which of the following were the two
conflicting principles in Ancient
China?
A. Lacquerware and Swords
B. Agriculture and Trade
C. Hinduism and Buddhism
Answer:
b
Explanation:
it was the two most important industries at the time
What did Theodore Roosevelt use to settle the Coal Strike of 1902? Select ALL that apply
Answer:
On Friday, October 3, 1902, President Theodore Roosevelt called a precedent-shattering meeting at the temporary White House at 22 Lafayette Place, Washington, D.C. A great strike in the anthracite coal fields of Pennsylvania threatened a coal famine. The President feared "untold misery . . . with the certainty of riots which might develop into social war."1 Although he had no legal right to intervene, he sent telegrams to both sides summoning them to Washington to discuss the problem.
Roosevelt, who had been injured a month earlier when his carriage was hit by a trolley car, sat in his wheelchair pleading with representatives of management and labor. "With all the earnestness there is in me . ..," the President urged, "I ask that there be an immediate resumption of operations in the coal mines in some such way as will . . . meet the crying needs of the people." He appealed to the patriotism of the contestants to make "individual sacrifices for the general good."2
This meeting marked the turn of the U.S. Government from strikebreaker to peacemaker in industrial disputes. In the 19th century, presidents, if they acted at all, tended to side with employers. Andrew Jackson became a strikebreaker in 1834 when he sent troops to the construction sites of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal.3 War Department employees operated the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad during the Civil War .4 In the violent rail strikes of 1877, Rutherford B. Hayes sent troops to prevent obstruction of the mails.5 Grover Cleveland used soldiers to break the Pullman strike of 1894.6
Explanation:
Why might violence be tempting to activists? Why might it be risky to their movements?
Answer:
We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.
Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.
Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.
Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.
Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.
Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.
Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.
Explanation:
Violence might be tempting to activist because it can give desired result in less time and could make life after it easier. It might be riskier because violence demands bloodshed.
Activist and ViolenceThe role of violence in Activist movements historically has given mixed results, while some movement became successful like Bolshevik Revolution or English Revolution, the other like Indian National Movement were not so much successful because of the role of violence.
For Activist violence is tempting because it is the easier way to attract the interest of the masses, and it could help in making revolution.
But the role of violence in activist movements are always riskier as it can lead to death, bloodshed, and civil unrest.
Learn more about Role of Activists here:
https://brainly.com/question/1565393
This map shows a portion of the Americas. Which region was freed primarily
by Simón Bolivar?
ATLANTIC OCEAN
PACIFIC OCEAN
A. Region D
O B. Region
O C. Region A
OD. Region B
OPTION (D) Region B,
As “The Liberator,” Simon Bolívar liberated or helped liberate the territory of New Granada (1819).
What is meant by 'Liberator'?
A liberator is someone who sets people free from a situation, situation or set of ideas that restricts them in some sort of way.
Who is Simon Bolivar?
Simón Bolívar was a Venezuelan statesman and soldier who played a centric role in the South American independence movement. Bolívar served as the President of Gran Colombia (1819–30) and as a dictator of Peru (1823–26). The country of Bolivia is named after him.
What is 'New Granda'?
The Viceroyalty of New Granada also known as the Viceroyalty of the New Kingdom of Granada or Viceroyalty of Santafé was the name given on 27 May 1717, to the jurisdiction of the Spanish Empire in northern South America, corresponding to the modern Colombia, Panama, Ecuador and Venezuela.
To know more about Simon bolivar ,Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19913637
#SPJ3
Which statement best explains why parents were most likely to support
Progressive reforms?
A. Progressives lowered the voting age, allowing older teenagers
who still lived at home to participate in elections.
B. Progressives argued that parents should receive tax breaks, giving
couples more incentives to have children.
O c. Progressives pushed for maternity leave, allowing pregnant
mothers to take time off from work.
D. Progressives organized youth programs, such as the Boy Scouts
and Girl Scouts, to help children develop.
Answer:
D. Progressives organized youth programs, such as the Boy Scouts
and Girl Scouts, to help children develop.
President Hoover believed in
"rugged individualism." What does
this term mean?
A. It was time for parks to be built west of the
Mississippi.
B. You want to solve your own problem, not have
the government do it for you.
C. Citizens would be compensated for inventions
submitted to the patent office.
Answer: It means, "You want to solve your own problem, not have
the government do it for you." B
Explanation:
HELP For all his popularity, Andrew Jackson was a controversial President. In the voice of Jackson himself, defend each of the attacks on his record.
1. Andrew Jackson dishonored the presidency by holding a raucous inaugural celebration inside the White House.
2. Jackson is awarding federal jobs to friends and political cronies. This "spoils system" will fill our government with unskilled people.
3. In threatening to send the Army to South Carolina to enforce a tariff, Jackson is behaving like a tyrant.
4. Jackson has signed the Indian Removal Act, paving the way for a brutal, forced removal of entire groups of people.
Although this is a personal task that only you can complete, this is an example of how President Jackson would most likely respond to such accusations:
1. Andrew Jackson dishonored the presidency by holding a raucous inaugural celebration inside the White House.
People who call this celebration a "raucous" do not understand the real purpose of such celebration. I believe that becoming President of the United States is a great honour, and one that should be appreciated and celebrated. Moreover, I believe that people want to participate in such a celebration. This is the time to be loud and boisterous, and to be happy. There is no lack of honour in this action.
2. Jackson is awarding federal jobs to friends and political cronies. This "spoils system" will fill our government with unskilled people.
The people that I choose, while personally close to me, are also chosen for their skills and intelligence. Because I know them well, I can see the qualities and abilities that they display, and that might not be obvious to citizens. This means that I always know whether these people are qualified to perform the job I need them to do.
3. In threatening to send the Army to South Carolina to enforce a tariff, Jackson is behaving like a tyrant.
A tyrant is a person who does not care about citizens. This is the opposite of me. I care deeply about the people of the nation, which is why I have to take strict measures. Moreover, I send the army precisely because I care for the law, which is something a tyrant rarely believes in.
4. Jackson has signed the Indian Removal Act, paving the way for a brutal, forced removal of entire groups of people.
While some Native American people might be affected by this, the growth of civilization is worth the sacrifices. This will allow us to grow more food, have larger and more productive farms, or bring wealth and education to Native Americans.
3. Explain how overcrowding in cities contributed to the spread of the plague.
Answer:
Easy spread of disease.
Explanation:
Due to overpopulation, it would be difficult to go through the day without encountering someone carrying the plague. Because of this, one may catch it through contact and continue to unintentionally spread it to those around them !! This could easily cause an outbreak in a town/city.
