Graph the function f(x) = 14(0.87)x. Does this function show growth or decay? What is the equation of the asymptote? Growth; y = 0 Growth; y = 14 Decay; y = 0 Decay; y = 14

The expression that represents the total amount that Ignatio and his friends spent is 15t

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

After spending on t games, we have

f(t) = Rate * t

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

f(t) = 15 * t

Evaluate

f(t) = 15t

Hence, the expression that represents the total amount that Ignatio and his friends spent is 15t

Read more abiut linear relation at

https://brainly.com/question/30318449

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]a. \: 30 + a = 40 \\ a = 40 - 30 \\ a = 10 \\ b. \: 500 + b = 200 \\ b = 200 - 500 \\ b = - 300 \\ c. \: - 1 + c = - 2 \\ c = - 2 + 1 \\ c = - 1 \\ d. \: d +3.567=0 \\ d = 0 - 3.567 \\ d = - 3.567[/tex]

hope it helps:)

Answer:

[tex]\circ \quad sin\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) = -1\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad \cos \left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right)= 0\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad \tan \left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) = -\dfrac{1}{0}[/tex]   is not defined

[tex]\circ \quad \csc\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) =-1\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad \sec\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) = \dfrac {1}{0}\\[/tex]  is not defined

[tex]\circ \quad \cot\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) =\:0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{Values of trig functions for $-\dfrac{\pi}{2}$ are: }\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad sin\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) = - sin\left(\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) = -1\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad \cos \left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right)=\cos \left(\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) = 0\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad \tan \left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) = \dfrac{sin\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right)}{cos\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) } = \dfrac{-1}{0}[/tex]
This is undefined since division by zero is undefined

[tex]\circ \quad \csc\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) = \dfrac{1}{sin\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right)} = \dfrac{1}{-1} =-1\\\\[/tex]

[tex]\circ \quad \sec\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right) = \dfrac{1}{\cos\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right)} = \dfrac {1}{0}[/tex]
This is undefined

[tex]\circ \quad \cot\left(-\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right) = \dfrac{cos\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right)}{sin\left(-\dfrac{\pi }{2}\right)}\:=\:\dfrac{0}{-1\:}=\:0[/tex]

Using mathematical operations, Cindy's answer would have been 15 if she had worked the problem correctly by following her teacher's instructions.

The correct value can be determined by reversing Cindy's calculations to find the certain number as follows:

(x - 9) ÷ 3 = 43

x = 43 x 3 + 9

x = 138

With the certain number, x = 138, the correct mathematical operations can be performed as follows:

(138 - 3) ÷ 9

135 ÷ 9

= 15

Thus, Cindy's correct answer would have been 15 if she had performed the correct mathematical operations, according to her teacher's instructions.

Learn more about mathematical operations at https://brainly.com/question/4721701.

#SPJ1

Answer:

A multi-step-word problem is like a puzzle with lots of pieces. Multi-step word problems are math problems that have more than one operation. An operation is addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division. Multi-step word problems can have any combination of these operations

The probability that a sample of size n = 158 is randomly selected with a mean greater than 242.4 is 0.751.

z = (x - μ) / (σ/√n)

where x is the sample mean.

Substituting the values, we get:

z = (242.4 - 246) / (89.7/√158) ≈ -0.670

We want to find the probability of obtaining a sample mean greater than 242.4, which is equivalent to finding the probability of obtaining a standardized sample mean greater than z = -0.670. We can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find this probability.

P(z > -0.670) ≈ 0.751

Learn more about probability on

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

she needs to clean 15 uniforms to break even

The GCF (Greatest Common Factor) is the largest number that divides evenly into two or more numbers. In this case, we can find the GCF of 75 and 3 by listing their factors and finding the largest one they have in common. The factors of 75 are 1, 3, 5, 15, 25, and 75. The factors of 3 are 1 and 3. The largest factor they have in common is 3. Therefore, the GCF of 75 and 3 is 3.

We can use the GCF to factor the expression 75 - 3x by dividing each term by the GCF and writing the expression as a product. In this case, we can divide both terms by 3 to get 75/3 - (3x)/3, which simplifies to 25 - x. We can then write the original expression as a product by multiplying this simplified expression by the GCF: 3(25 - x).

Therefore, the factored form of 75 - 3x using the GCF is 3(25 - x).

Answer:

3(25-x)

Step-by-step explanation:

First we find the GCF of 75 and -3x, which is 3

3 is the highest number we can divide both 75 and -3

Hence, the answer is 3(25-x)

The null and the alternate hypothesis are:

In hypothesis testing, we take the null hypothesis (H₀) and the alternative hypothesis (H₁). The null hypothesis is the opposite of the claim , while the alternative hypothesis states  the claim.

In this case, the null hypothesis is that a majority of adults would not erase their personal information online if they could (i.e., 50% or less of them would do so). The alternative hypothesis is that a majority of adults would erase their personal information online if they could (i.e., more than 50% of them would do so). In symbolic form:

H₀: p ≤ 0.5

H₁: p > 0.5

Read more on hypothesis here:https://brainly.com/question/606806

#SPJ1

A passenger can travel 6.875 miles for $20 using the given taxi fare function.

To determine how many miles a passenger can travel for $20 using the taxi fare function f(x) = 2.56x + 2.40, we need to set up an equation and solve for x.

The equation we need to solve is:

2.56x + 2.40 = 20

To solve for x, we can start by subtracting 2.40 from both sides of the equation:

2.56x = 17.60

Next, we can divide both sides by 2.56:

x = 6.875

This calculation assumes that the fare is based solely on distance and that there are no additional fees or charges.

To learn more about function click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31498912

#SPJ1

The result of the carrying out the operation, Add -4(row 1) to row 3, on the given matrix is:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&2&1&-5\\0&4&-2&3\\0&-9&2&12\end{array}\right][/tex]

From the question, we are to perform the given row operation on the given matrix

From the given information, the given matrix is:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&2&1&-5\\0&4&-2&3\\4&-1&6&-8\end{array}\right][/tex]

We are to carry out the operation

Add -4(row 1) to row 3

This means we should multiply row 1 by -4

-4 × [ 1     2    1   | -5

       -4   -8   -4  | 20

Now, we will add the result to row 3

4    -1     6  |  -8

-4   -8   -4  | 20

------------------------

0    -9    2  |  12

Hence,

The resulting matrix becomes

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1&2&1&-5\\0&4&-2&3\\0&-9&2&12\end{array}\right][/tex]

Learn more on Reducing row matrices here: https://brainly.com/question/30336349

#SPJ1

Answer:

14/16 = 0.875

Answer:
A and B

Step-by-step explanation:

-10/3= -3.33333333333

(- (-10))/(-3)= -10/3, (negative sign being erased)

=-3.33333333333

hope it helped:)

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

2$ times 30 luna bars at harmons is $60

The number line on which point A represents the ant's position after crawling 2/8 yard would be a number line labeled in units of yards, with O representing 0 and A representing 1/4 yard to the right of O.

To decide the place of the insect subsequent to creeping 2/8 yard from the insect mount, we really want to address this distance on a number line.

Since 2/8 can be rearranged to 1/4, we can address the distance crept by the subterranean insect as 1/4 of a yard.

To develop a number line to address this distance, we can begin with the point addressing the subterranean insect mount (we should call it point O) and separate a distance of 1/4 of a yard to one side of O. This point, which we can name as point A, addresses the place of the insect subsequent to creeping 2/8 yard (or 1/4 yard) from the insect mount.

The number line would have units of yards, with the distance between every unit separated similarly. The point O would address 0 on the number line, and the point A would address 1/4 yard on the number line.

Thus, the number line on which point An addresses the insect's situation in the wake of creeping 2/8 yard would be a number line named in units of yards, with O addressing 0 and An addressing 1/4 yard to one side of O.

To learn more about number line, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/18586935

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

An ant crawled 2/8 yard from an ant mount. On which number line does point A represent the ants position after crawling 2/8 yard?

Answer:

the number is even

Step-by-step explanation:

an even number plus an even number will aalways be even. adding 6 to an odd number will never be even. Therefore the number will be even

The reference angle of given angles are -6π/13 and -5π / 6

To get coterminal angles, you simply have to add or subtract 2π.

a) 32π/13 =

= -32π/13 + 2π

= -32π + 26π / 13

= -6π/13

b) -17π/6 + 2π =

= -17π + 12π / 6

= -5π / 6

Hence the reference angle of given angles are -6π/13 and -5π / 6

Learn more about coterminal angles, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29133154

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

She earns $15 per poinsettia.

Answer:

2:35

Step-by-step explanation:

it takes 2 hours to get to Muar so 9:45

he spends 1 hour 40 in muar so 11:35

he went at 60 Km/h before so he returns at 40Km/h so it takes 3 hours so 2:35

Step-by-step explanation:

T = 5200 = .2 ( E - 10600)

       5200 / .2 = E - 10600

            E = 5200/.2   + 10 600 = 36600 pounds

The "Expression" which is considered equivalent to this expression "(3x-1)-2(x+2)' is (c) x-5.

In mathematics, an algebraic expression is a combination of numbers, variables, which are joined by arithmetic operations (such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division).

We have to find the equivalent-expression for (3x-1)-2(x+2);

⇒ (3x-1)-2(x+2),

⇒ (3x - 1) - 2x - 4,

Combing the like-terms together in the above expression,

We get,

⇒ 3x - 2x -1 - 4,

⇒ x - 5,

Therefore, the correct equivalent expression is Option (c).

Learn more about Expression here

https://brainly.com/question/29143314

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Which of the following expression is equivalent to (3x-1)-2(x+2)?

(a) x+3

(b) x+1

(c) x-5

(d) x-3

Answer:3

Step-by-step explanation: 1/2 X 6 = 3

Answer:

6 x 1/2 = 3 full bottles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  $640

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know the income tax reduction resulting from investing $3200 in a defined-contribution account when the marginal tax rate is 20%.

The money invested in a defined-contribution account is not subject to income taxes when it is invested. The tax savings is ...

  20% × $3200 = $640

Jermaine lowered his taxes by $640.

The strength of the beam is proportional to the width and the square of the depth, so we can express it as Strength = k * width * depth²

where k is the proportionality constant.

In the given figures, the beam is cut from a cylindrical log of diameter d = 24 cm, which means the maximum width and depth of the beam are limited by this diameter. We can see from the figures that the width and depth of the beam change depending on the angle at which it is cut from the log.

In Figure 1, the width and depth of the beam are equal, so we can express the strength of the beam as:

Strength = k * width * depth² = k * x² * (d/2 - x)²

where x is the width and depth of the beam.

In Figure 2, the width and depth of the beam are not equal, so we need to express them separately. Let w be the width and d be the depth, then we can express the strength of the beam as:

Strength = k * width * depth² = k * w * d² = k * ((d/2)sinθ)² * ((d/2)cosθ)²

where θ is the angle at which the beam is cut from the log.

In Figure 3, the width and depth of the beam also vary with the angle θ. We can express the width and depth as follows:

w = d sinθ

d = (d/2)cosθ

Then we can express the strength of the beam as:

Strength = k * width * depth² = k * (d sinθ) * [(d/2)cosθ]²

Therefore, depending on the angle at which the beam is cut from the log, the strength of the beam can be expressed using different equations, but in all cases, the strength is proportional to the width and the square of the depth, with a proportionality constant k.

To learn more about strength of a beam click on,

https://brainly.com/question/1553947

#SPJ1

Complete question is:

The strength of a beam is proportional to the width and the square of the depth. A beam is cut from a cylindrical log of diameter d = 24 cm. The figures show different ways this can be done. Express the strength of the beam as a function of the angle in the figures. (Use k as your proportionality constant.)

The likelihood that the first question will be true is equally likely and unlikely.

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The teacher gave a true and false quiz where P(true) = 0.5 for each question.

This means that

P(true) = 0.5

As a percentage,, we have

P(true) = 50%

When the probability of an event is 50%, then the event is equally likely and unlikely.

Hence, the liikelihood is (c) qually likely and unlikely.

Read more about probability at

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of trigonometry comes out to be approximately 21.424 metres long when the sun is 35 degrees above the horizon.

Some people assert that the growth of astrophysics was influenced by the merging of various fields. Many metric problems can be solved or the result of a calculation can be ascertained with the use of exact mathematical techniques. Trigonometry is the study of the six basic geometric calculations from a scientific perspective. They go by many other names and acronyms, including sine, variance, direction, and others. (csc).

Here,

When the sun is at a 35° elevation angle and the structure is 15 metres tall, we want to determine the length of the shadow (on the next side).

Let x represent the desired shadow's length. Next, we have

=> tan 35° = 15/x

When we multiply both sides by x, we obtain:

=> x tan 35° = 15

By dividing both sides by 35° of tan, we obtain:

=> x = 15 / tan 35°

We may calculate the value of the tangent of 35 degrees using a calculator:

=> tan 35° ≈ 0.7002

Next, we have

=> 15x/0.702x=21.424 metres

Consequently, a building 15 metres high will create a shadow that is approximately 21.424 metres long when the sun is 35 degrees above the horizon.

To know more about trigonometry visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29002217

#SPJ9

Chebyshev's inequality is a statistical tool that provides a bound on the probability that a random variable deviates from its mean by a certain amount. It can be used to determine whether there is statistical evidence to support a hypothesis based on sample data.

Suppose we have a random variable D that represents the proportion of defective lightbulbs in a population. We want to test the hypothesis that the average proportion of defective lightbulbs in the population is greater than 0.10, i.e., H₀: D ≤ 0.10 vs H₁: D > 0.10. Let's assume that we have a sample of n lightbulbs and that the sample proportion of defective lightbulbs is W.

Chebyshev's inequality states that for any random variable X, the probability that X deviates from its mean by k standard deviations is at most 1/k². In other words,

P(|X - μ| ≥ kσ) ≤ 1/k²,

where μ and σ are the mean and standard deviation of X, respectively.

Now, let's apply Chebyshev's inequality to our sample proportion W. Since we don't know the true mean and standard deviation of D, we can use the sample mean and sample standard deviation as estimates. The sample mean is W/n and the sample standard deviation is √[W(1-W)/n]. We want to find the probability that D is greater than 0.10, which is equivalent to finding the probability that W/n is greater than 0.10.

Let k = (0.10 - W/n)/(√[W(1-W)/n]). Then,

P(D > 0.10) = P(W/n > 0.10) = P(W - 0.10n > 0) = P(W - μ ≥ (0.10 - μ)n) ≤ σ²/[(0.10 - μ)n]²,

where μ = E(W) = D and σ² = Var(W) = D(1-D)/n. Thus,

P(D > 0.10) ≤ D(1-D)/n[(0.10 - D)n]².

To decide whether there is statistical evidence to support the hypothesis H₁, we need to compare this upper bound on the probability of D being greater than 0.10 to the significance level α = 0.05. If the upper bound is less than α, then we reject the null hypothesis H₀ in favor of the alternative hypothesis H₁.

To know more about Hypothesis here

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ1