find the measure of the missing angle​

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

:-)

Answer:

Follows are the responses to the given question:

Step-by-step explanation:

Please find the complete question in the attached file.

[tex]Stem\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Leaf\\\\[/tex]

   [tex]3\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3\\\\3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5,6,6,7,8\\\\4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0,0,0,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,4\\\\4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5,6,6,7,8,8,8\\\\5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1,4,4\\\\[/tex]

  [tex]5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5,8\\\\6\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1\\\\6 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6,6,7,8\\\\7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NONE\\\\7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6\\[/tex]

The stem & leaf show demonstrates that 0.55 for both the data is indeed a reasonable value.

The probable outlier is the data value 0.76.

The variability of the techniques is relatively large.

It show isn't symmetrical and seems to be optimistic.

Answer:

The number should be 16.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

1/8 * x = 2

x = 16

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

First, use the distributive property to open the parentheses:

-3x + 5x + 10

2x + 10

The correct answer is C

Kaitlin forgot to use the distributive property on both the x and 2.  

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Martin Exercised 35 minutes in 7 days. Correct me if I'm wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter is 6 ft

3 ft + 3ft

Answer:

10 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

17×6×h=1020

102h=1020

h=1020/102=10

h=10 cm

At a speed of 48 miles per hour, it would take 13 hours.

Velocity is the pace and direction of an item's movement, whereas speed is the time rate at which an object is travelling along a route.

Given:

The amount of time needed to complete a certain road trip, t, varies inversely with the speed of a vehicle, s. At a speed of 52 miles per hour, the trip will be complete in 12 hours.

Distance is constant.

And we know the formula:

Distance = speed x time

              = 52 x 12

              = 624 miles

Now to find the time:

Now for speed = 48 miles per hour

time,

t = distance / speed

 = 624/48

 = 13 hours

Therefore, 13 hours would it take at a speed of 48 miles per hour.

To learn more about the speed;

https://brainly.com/question/7359669

#SPJ2

Answer:

Number of people that will be infected in 4 years is 252,610.

Step-by-step explanation:

The number of people that will be infected in 4 years can be calculated as follows:

Number of people that will be infected in year 1 = 160,000

Number of people that will not be infected in year 1 = 400,000 - 160,000 = 240,000

Number of people that will be infected in year 2 = Number of people that will not be infected in year 1 * 15% = 240,000 * 15% = 36,000

Number of people that will not be infected in year 2 = Number of people that will not be infected in year 1 - Number of people that will be infected in year 2 = 240,000 - 36,000 = 204,000

Number of people that will be infected in year 3 = Number of people that will not be infected in year 2 * 15% = 204,000 * 15% = 30,600

Number of people that will not be infected in year 3 = Number of people that will not be infected in year 2 - Number of people that will be infected in year 3 = 204,000 - 30,600 = 173,400

Number of people that will be infected in year 4 = Number of people that will not be infected in year 3 * 15% = 173,400 * 15% = 26,010

Therefore, we have:

Number of people that will be infected in 4 years = Number of people that will be infected in year 1 + Number of people that will be infected in year 2 + Number of people that will be infected in year 3 + Number of people that will be infected in year 4 = 160,000 + 36,000 + 30,600 + 26,010 = 252,610

Answer:

a)[tex]x^{2}[/tex]+8x+15

b)[tex]x^{2}[/tex]-x-20

Step-by-step explanation:

a) (x+3)(x+5)

a)[tex]x^{2}[/tex]+5x+3x+15

a)[tex]x^{2}[/tex]+8x+15

b) (x+4)(x-5)

b) [tex]x^{2}[/tex]-5x+4x-20

b)[tex]x^{2}[/tex]-x-20

Answer:

the answer would be 15x+ 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1 + 15x

Step-by-step explanation:

-7+13+2x+8   separate the terms

-7+8 = 1

13x + 2x = 15x  put them together

1+15x

Answer:

7 Hours

Step by Step:

150 pages divided by 25 page per hour is 7 Hours

If we do 150/25 we have 7 which is the answer

Answer: D or $38

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: The answer is D) $38.

Step-by-step explanation:

When you multiply $9.50 by 4 you get $38.

Answer:

(sqrt(7))/3 or decimal 0.8819171036881968635005385845464201419034197276941500601227781530...

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify the following:

(sqrt(14))/(sqrt(18))

Hint: | Simplify radicals.

sqrt(18) = sqrt(2×3^2) = 3 sqrt(2):

(sqrt(14))/(3 sqrt(2))

Hint: | Multiply numerator and denominator of (sqrt(14))/(3 sqrt(2)) by sqrt(2).

Rationalize the denominator. (sqrt(14))/(3 sqrt(2)) = (sqrt(14))/(3 sqrt(2))×(sqrt(2))/(sqrt(2)) = (sqrt(14) sqrt(2))/(3×2):

(sqrt(14) sqrt(2))/(3×2)

Hint: | Multiply 3 and 2 together.

3×2 = 6:

(sqrt(14) sqrt(2))/6

Hint: | For a>=0, sqrt(a) sqrt(b) = sqrt(a b). Apply this to sqrt(14) sqrt(2).

sqrt(14) sqrt(2) = sqrt(14×2):

(sqrt(14×2))/6

Hint: | Multiply 14 and 2 together.

14×2 = 28:

(sqrt(28))/6

Hint: | Simplify radicals.

sqrt(28) = sqrt(2^2×7) = 2 sqrt(7):

(2 sqrt(7))/6

Hint: | In (2 sqrt(7))/6, divide 6 in the denominator by 2 in the numerator.

2/6 = 2/(2×3) = 1/3:

Answer:  (sqrt(7))/3

Answer:

so on the first one all your doing is multiplying 65 by the number on top so the graph should look like this.

2 3 4 5

130 195 260 325

On the second one all your doing is putting the dot where the numbers meet up so for example. I'm going to try my best at this to create a drawing so pretend ! is a line and - is also a line.

10!

!

8!

!

4!_|●_|_|_|_|_|_|

!_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|

!_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_

0!_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_

2

so I hope this made sense so where I put my dot is where the blue dot should go on the graph

Answer:

69

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

There is no solution to this system.

Step-by-step explanation:

The left side of the first equation is 3 times the left side of the second one.

If we multiply the whole of the second equation by 3 we get:

3x - 6y = -16.

As the first equation is 3x - 6y = -12 we see that there is no solution to this system.  3x - 6y can't be equal to -12 and -16.

Answer:

false

Step-by-step explanation:

half of 60 dollars is 30

think of it as half of 6

Answer:

Factorising fully

then

2z - 22

= 2( z - 11)

Answer:

11

Step-by-step explanation:

11 * 7= 77

77 + 11= 88

Answer:

63.8 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

If the train travels 4.4 miles in 4 minutes, then you have to divide 4.4/4 to find the miles the train travels per minute.

4.4/4 = 1.1

So, since the train travels 1.1 miles per minute, and we want to know how fast it travels in 58 minutes, we have to multiply 1.1 by 58. Since 1.1 is a decimal number, we have to multiply both sides by 10 to get 11x580.

11x580 = 5800+ 580 = 6380

Since we multiplied both numbers by 10, we have to divide 6380 by 100.

6380/100 = 63.8

So, the train travels 63.8 miles in 58 minutes.

Answer:

x = 14

y = 40

Step-by-step explanation:

3y+8 = 128

3y = 120

y = 40

45/20=2.25 (scale factor)

5x-25 = 2.25(2x-8)

5x-25 = 4.5x - 18

.5x = 7

x=14

Answer: 6 packs are cheaper by $2.50 or 0.42 c per can.

Step-by-step explanation:

In 6 packs, 600 cans = 100 packs at 3.35 = 335

in 24s, 600 cans = 25 cases at 13.50 = 337.50

Answer:

-8.2,-2.5,.4,2.4

Step-by-step explanation:

start by negatives. negatives are lesser the higher they are. so -8.2 is less than -2.5. then positives are greater than negatives. .4 is less than 2.4. hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

given

7f = 49

f = 49/ 7

f = 7

Hope it will help :)

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]7f = 49 \\ divide \: both \: sides \: by \: 7 \\ \frac{7f}{7} = \frac{49}{7} \\ f = 7[/tex]

8square centimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

1 square is 1cm2. theres 8 squares so 8cm2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]y=mx+b\\ \\ m=\frac{14925-8750}{115-50}=95\\ \\ y=95x+b,\ (50,8750)\\ \\ 8750=95(50)+b\\ \\ 8750=4750+b,\ b=4000\\ \\ y=95x+4000[/tex]

Answer:

Thus, 5/11 is the simplified fraction for 55/121 by using the GCD or HCF method. Thus, 5/11 is the simplified fraction for 55/121 by using the prime factorization method.

I hope it's helpful!

Answer:

Hank had a z-score of -1.375.

Jane had a z-score of -2.39.

Jane had the better year relative to their peers, due to her lower z-score.

Step-by-step explanation:

Z-score:

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Hank:

ERA of 3.36. For the males, the mean ERA was 4.449 and the standard deviation was 0.792. This means that we have to find Z when [tex]X = 3.36, \mu = 4.449, \sigma = 0.792[/tex]. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{3.36 - 4.449}{0.792}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.375[/tex]

Hank had a z-score of -1.375.

Jane

ERA of 3.49.  For the females, the mean ERA was 5.091 and the standard deviation was 0.669. This means that we have to find Z when [tex]X = 3.49, \mu = 5.091, \sigma = 0.669[/tex]. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{3.49 - 5.091}{0.669}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.39[/tex]

Jane had a z-score of -2.39.

Which player had the better year relative to their peers, Hank or Jane

Low ERA is good, high is bad. This means that whoever had the lower z-score had the better year, and in this case, it's Jane

Answer:

I speak English.

Step-by-step explanation:

I  am from America.