Answer:
Yes, Thomas Jefferson had several dogs throughout his life. Some of the breeds he owned include Briards, Dalmatians, and Greyhounds. He was known to be an animal lover and even wrote a letter expressing his affection for his Briard, Buzzy.
Yes
Thomas Jefferson's Pets
Thomas Jefferson was known as a man who valued his privacy, however, he kept many pets during his lifetime. For instance, he had a number of pet mockingbirds during his time as president. Jefferson had three dogs including a terrier named Sweet Lips, and a Newfoundland named New Purchase
1. What's the difference between a political and moral issue/decision?
D
What facts would a parole board be MOST interested in during a parole hearing?
the amount of money the inmate has earned in prison
OB.
the opinions of the inmate's family members
OC. the good behavior of the inmate while incarcerated
OD. the details of the case against the inmate
Reset
Next
The facts that a parole board would be MOST interested in during a parole hearing would be option C, the good behavior of the inmate while incarcerated. Parole boards use parole hearings to determine whether an inmate is eligible for release from prison before serving their full sentence. They will consider a variety of factors when making their decision, but the inmate's behavior while incarcerated is one of the most important. The parole board will want to know if the inmate has participated in any rehabilitation or educational programs, whether they have had any disciplinary issues while in prison, and whether they have shown remorse for their crime. The amount of money the inmate has earned in prison or the opinions of their family members may be considered, but they are unlikely to be as significant as the inmate's behavior and readiness for release. The details of the case against the inmate may also be considered, but they are not the primary focus of the parole hearing.
Mapp v Ohio constitutional question
The constitutional question in Mapp v Ohio was whether evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure could be used in state criminal trials.
What happened in Mapp v. Ohio ?The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a suspect's constitutional rights, such as an unreasonable search and seizure, in criminal proceedings.
In this case, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to state law enforcement officers, and that evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure is inadmissible in state criminal trials. This decision had significant implications for the protection of individual rights under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution.
Find out more on Mapp v. Ohio at https://brainly.com/question/30212637
#SPJ1
