Calculate each Poisson probability:

(a) P(X ≤ 10), λ = 11.0 (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.)

Probability

(b) P(X > 3), λ = 5.2 (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.)

Probability

(c) P(X < 2), λ = 3.7 (Round your answer to 4 decimal places.)

Probability

The second derivative of P(t) is P''(t) = 0.0004 e^0.02t + 0.0004 e^0.02t.

The second derivative of P(t), denoted as P''(t), can be found by taking the derivative of P'(t). Using the given information that P'(t) = 0.02t e^0.02t - 0.98 e^0.02t, we can apply the product rule and the chain rule to find P''(t):

P''(t) = d/dt [0.02t e^0.02t - 0.98 e^0.02t]
       = 0.02 e^0.02t + 0.02t (d/dt[e^0.02t]) - 0.98 (d/dt[e^0.02t])
       = 0.02 e^0.02t + 0.02t (0.02 e^0.02t) - 0.98 (0.02 e^0.02t)
       = 0.0004 e^0.02t + 0.0004 e^0.02t

Know more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The distance from the house you should place the base of the ladder is approximately 5.18 feet from the house.

To find the distance from the house to place the base of the ladder, we can use the trigonometric function cosine. Cosine is defined as the ratio of the adjacent side to the hypotenuse in a right triangle.

In this case, the hypotenuse is the height of the ladder, which is 20 feet. The angle we want to use is 75 degrees, and we want to find the adjacent side, which is the distance from the house to the ladder. So we can set up the equation:

cos(75°) = (base of the ladder) / (length of the ladder)

cos(75°) = base / 20 feet

Now, we can solve for the base:

base = 20 feet * cos(75°)
base ≈ 20 feet * 0.25882
base ≈ 5.18 feet

So, you should place the base of the 20-foot ladder approximately 5.18 feet from the house, rounding to the hundredths.

Learn more about trigonometric function here: https://brainly.com/question/29718746

#SPJ11

If the ticket price is $4.38 will get maximum revenue.

To maximize revenue, we need to find the ticket price that would result in the highest product of attendance and ticket price. Let x be the ticket price and y be the attendance.

Given that attendance is linearly related to ticket price, we can write the equation of the line in slope-intercept form as:

y = mx + b

where m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept.

Using the given information, we have two data points:

(9, 29000) and (8, 33000)

We can use these points to find the slope of the line:

m = [tex](y_2 - y_1) / (x_2 - x_1)[/tex]

m = (33000 - 29000) / (8 - 9)

m = 4000

Now we can use either of the two data points to find the y-intercept:

y = mx + b

29000 = 4000(9) + b

b = -35000

So the equation of the line is:

y = 4000x - 35000

To find the ticket price that maximizes revenue, we need to find the value of x that makes the product yx the largest.

The revenue function is given by:

R = xy

Substituting y = 4000x - 35000, we get:

R = x(4000x - 35000)

R = [tex]4000x^2 - 35000x[/tex]

To find the maximum revenue, we need to find the value of x that maximizes R.

We can do this by taking the derivative of R with respect to x and setting it equal to zero:

dR/dx = 8000x - 35000 = 0

x = 4.375

So the ticket price that would maximize revenue is $4.375.

However, we need to check if this is a maximum or a minimum. We can do this by taking the second derivative of R with respect to x:

[tex]\frac{d^2R}{dx^2}[/tex] = 8000

Since the second derivative is positive, we can conclude that x = 4.375 is a minimum, which means that the ticket price that would maximize revenue is actually the closest rounded value, which is $4.38.

For similar question on derivative

https://brainly.com/question/28376218

#SPJ11

Question:-

A baseball team plays in a stadium that holds 66000 spectators. With the ticket price at $9 the average attendance has been 29000. When the price dropped to $8, the average attendance rose to 33000. Assume that attendance is linearly related to ticket price. What ticket price would maximize revenue?

As a result, g(x) and h(x) have the following composition: f(x) = 2 as to determine the composition of g(x) and h(x) .

With the input (the x-value) drawn on the x plane and the output (the y-value) written on the vertical axis, functions can be represented graphically. Understanding a function's behaviour, for example, if it is going up or down, and locating significant characteristics like peaks and minima, can be done by looking at its graph. Many branches of arithmetic, as well as physics, construction, computer science, sociology, and a wide range of other disciplines, use functions. They are a crucial tool for problem-solving across a broad spectrum and for simulating real-world occurrences.

given

We may utilise the distributive property of multiplication to multiply the two functions:

[tex]g(x) * h(x) = (x - 2) * 4[/tex]

= 4x - 8

Hence, f(x) = 4x - 8 is the result of the two functions' product.

Composition: To determine the composition of g(x) and h(x), we must replace every instance of x with h(x) in g(x):

[tex]g(h(x)) = g(4) (4)[/tex]

= 4 - 2

= 2

As a result, g(x) and h(x) have the following composition: f(x) = 2 as to determine the composition of g(x) and h(x) .

To know more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ1

Answer: 4 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

It went from 7 to 15 for the bottom of a right triangle.

your hypotenuse is 25 (length of ladder)

use Pythagorean theorem

25² = 7² + y²

y =24

25²=15² + y²

y=20

so it went from 24 to 20   the difference is 4 ft

The probability that the time until the first critical-part failure is 5 years or more is approximately 0.611 or 61.1%.

To find the probability that the time until the first critical-part failure is 5 years or more, we can use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the exponential distribution:

P(X ≥ 5) = 1 - P(X < 5)

where X is the time until the first critical-part failure.

The CDF of the exponential distribution with mean μ is given by:

[tex]F(X) = 1 - e^{-\frac{X}{\mu}}[/tex]

Substituting μ = 3.4 years, we get:

[tex]$P(X < 5) = F(5) = 1 - e^{-5/3.4} \approx 0.389$[/tex]

Therefore,

P(X ≥ 5) = 1 - P(X < 5) ≈ 0.611

So the probability that the time until the first critical-part failure is 5 years or more is approximately 0.611 or 61.1%.

To learn more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

Option B: The probability distribution of all x values calculated from all possible samples of size n is the correct answer.

What is probability?

Probability is a fundamental concept in statistics and mathematics that helps to measure the likelihood or chance of an event occurring. It provides a way to quantify uncertain events or situations and make informed decisions based on that information. The probability of an event can range from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating impossibility and 1 representing certainty.

When dealing with a sample mean, the sampling distribution refers to the probability distribution of all possible sample means of a given sample size taken from a population.

It is a theoretical distribution that shows all possible sample means that could be obtained from the population, and is a crucial tool in statistical analysis and inference.

Therefore, the correct answer is -

Option B: the probability distribution of all x values calculated from all possible samples of size n.

To learn more about probability from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/23286309

#SPJ1

Between 21.7% and 30.7%

Explanation: To find the population percentage of yellow peas, we can use the formula for confidence interval:
Sample proportion +/- Z-score (standard error)
First, let's find the sample proportion of yellow peas:
Sample proportion (p-hat) = x/n = 152/580 = 0.2621
Next, we need to find the Z-score for a 99% confidence level. Using a Z-score table or calculator, we find that the Z-score is 2.576.
To find the standard error, we use the formula:
Standard error = sqrt(p-hat(1-p-hat)/n)
Standard error = sqrt(0.2621(1-0.2621)/580) = 0.022
Now, we can plug in the values into the formula for confidence interval:
0.2621 +/- 2.576(0.022)
The lower bound is 0.217 and the upper bound is 0.307.
Therefore, we can say with 99% confidence that the population percentage of yellow peas is between 21.7% and 30.7%.

Learn more about it here:

https://brainly.com/question/31581955

#SPJ11

The correct answer is,

(a) Unbounded on the feasible region.

Given that;

Suppose the objective function of a linear programming problem is written in terms of the current non basic variables.

And, there is an entering basic variable whose coefficient in each constraint is nonpositive.

Now, We know that;

If there is an entering basic variable whose coefficient in each constraint is nonpositive, this means that the objective function can be made arbitrarily large (positive or negative) by increasing the value of the entering basic variable.

Therefore, the objective function is unbounded on the feasible region.

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ4

Therefore, a corresponds to tan θ = 3/2, and b corresponds to cos θ = 2(√13)/13.

Trigonometric ratios are mathematical functions used to relate the angles and sides of a right-angled triangle. There are three primary trigonometric ratios: sine (sin), cosine (cos), and tangent (tan). Trigonometric ratios are commonly used in various fields, including physics, engineering, and mathematics, to solve problems related to angles and triangles.

Here,

We can use the definitions of the trigonometric ratios to find which ratio belongs to each value:

sin θ = (perpendicular/hypotenuse)

= 9/(3√13)

= 3/(√13)

cos θ = (base/hypotenuse)

= 6/(3√13)

= 2(√13)/13

tan θ = (perpendicular/base)

= 9/6

= 3/2

To know more about trigonometric ratio,

https://brainly.com/question/25122825

#SPJ1

The probability that in a random sample of 570 voters, less than 49.8% say they will vote for the incumbent is approximately 0.1459 or 14.59%

To solve this problem, we need to use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution, since we are dealing with a sample proportion and a sample size that are both large enough.

First, we need to find the mean and standard deviation of the sample proportion:

The mean of the sample proportion is equal to the population proportion, which is given as 53.5% or 0.535.

The standard deviation of the sample proportion is equal to the square root of [(population proportion × (1 - population proportion)) / sample size], which is:

σ = sqrt[(0.535 × 0.465) / 570] = 0.035

Next, we need to standardize the value of 49.8% using the mean and standard deviation of the sample proportion, and then find the corresponding probability from the standard normal distribution table or calculator:

The standardized score (z-score) for a sample proportion of 49.8% is:

z = (0.498 - 0.535) / 0.035 = -1.057

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the probability of a random sample of 570 voters having less than 49.8% voting for the incumbent:

P(z < -1.057) = 0.1459

Therefore, the probability that in a random sample of 570 voters, less than 49.8% say they will vote for the incumbent is approximately 0.1459 or 14.59% (rounded to four decimal places).

To learn more about probability, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Finally, we need to determine if this sequence converges. Since the terms alternate between -1 and 1 and do not approach a specific number, the sequence oscillates and does not converge. Therefore, the answer is "no".

The first five terms of the sequence (-17 (+6) are -17, -11, -5, 1, 7. To determine if the sequence converges, we need to check if it approaches a specific number as n (the term number) gets larger and larger. However, since the sequence is increasing without bounds, it does not converge to a specific number. Therefore, the limit does not exist (DNE).

For the second part of the question, we need to find the value of a for the sequence given by[tex]a_n = (-1)^{n+2).[/tex] To do this, we can simply plug in n=1 to get[tex]a_1 = (-1)^{(1+2)} = -1.[/tex]Therefore, a=-1.

Finally, we need to determine if this sequence converges. Since the terms alternate between -1 and 1 and do not approach a specific number, the sequence oscillates and does not converge. Therefore, the answer is "no".

learn more about sequence

https://brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

The positive solution for b is approximately 0.1818.

What is integration?

Integration is a mathematical operation that is the reverse of differentiation. Integration involves finding an antiderivative or indefinite integral of a function.

First, we need to evaluate the integral:

∫(3x - 8)dx = (3/2)x² - 8x + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Next, we can substitute this back into the original equation:

b( (3/2)x² - 8x + C ) |_ -1 = -1

where |_ -1 means "evaluated at x = -1".

Substituting x = -1 gives:

b( (3/2)(-1)² - 8(-1) + C ) = -1

Simplifying this expression gives:

(11b/2) + bC = -1

Since we are only interested in the positive value of b, we can solve for b in terms of C:

b = -2/(11 + 2C)

To find the value of C, we can use the fact that b is positive. Since the integral is a continuous function, it must be true that the integral evaluates to a negative value for some value of C, and a positive value for some larger value of C. Therefore, we can use trial and error to find the value of C that makes b positive.

Let's try C = -10. Then:

(11b/2) + bC = (11b/2) - 10b = b(11/2 - 10) = b/2

So, we have:

b/2 = -1

b = -2

This is not a positive value of b, so we need to try a larger value of C. Let's try C = 0:

(11b/2) + bC = (11b/2) = 5.5b

So, we have:

5.5b = -1

b = -1/5.5

b ≈ 0.1818 (rounded to 4 decimal places)

Therefore, the positive solution for b is approximately 0.1818.

To learn more about integration from the given link:

brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ1

Answer:

We can simplify this expression using Euler's formula, which states that for any real number x,

e^(ix) = cos(x) + i sin(x)

Let's start by writing (-1 + i√3) as a complex number in polar form:

-1 + i√3 = 2e^(i(2π/3))

Similarly, we can write (-1 - i√3) as:

-1 - i√3 = 2e^(-i(2π/3))

Now we can raise each of these complex numbers to the fourth and fifth powers, respectively:

(-1 + i√3)⁴ = (2e^(i(2π/3)))⁴ = 16e^(i(8π/3)) = 16e^(i(2π/3))

(-1 - i√3)⁵ = (2e^(-i(2π/3)))⁵ = 32e^(-i(10π/3)) = 32e^(i(2π/3))

Multiplying these two expressions together, we get:

(-1 + i√3)⁴(−1 - i√3)⁵ = 16e^(i(2π/3)) * 32e^(i(2π/3)) = 512e^(i(4π/3))

Now, we can use Euler's formula again to convert this expression back to rectangular form:

512e^(i(4π/3)) = 512(cos(4π/3) + i sin(4π/3)) = 512(-1/2 + i(-√3/2)) = 512ω²

where ω = e^(iπ/3) is a primitive cube root of unity. Therefore, we have shown that:

(-1 + i√3)⁴(−1 - i√3)⁵ = 512ω²

as desired.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first five terms of this sequence are a₁ = 20, a₂ = 16.75, a₃ = 15.8889, a₄ = 15.625, and a₅ = 15.528.

Sequences are a fundamental concept in mathematics and are used to describe patterns of numbers.

Now, let's take a look at the sequence defined by the nth term an = 15 + 2/n + 3/n². To find the first five terms of this sequence, we simply need to substitute n = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 into the formula for the nth term and evaluate.

a₁ = 15 + 2/1 + 3/1² = 20

a₂ = 15 + 2/2 + 3/2² = 16.75

a₃ = 15 + 2/3 + 3/3² = 15.8889

a₄ = 15 + 2/4 + 3/4² = 15.625

a₅ = 15 + 2/5 + 3/5² = 15.528

To know more about sequence here

https://brainly.com/question/7043242

#SPJ4

When using the regression analysis tool in Excel, the input Y range refers to the values for the dependent variables, while the input X range refers to the independent variables.

In other words, the Y variable is the outcome or response variable, which is affected or influenced by one or more X variables. The X variable is the predictor or explanatory variable, which helps to explain the variation in the Y variable. The regression analysis tool helps to establish a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables by estimating the coefficients of the equation that best describes the relationship.

It is important to note that the regression analysis assumes that there is a causal relationship between the independent and dependent variables, which means that changes in the independent variable can cause changes in the dependent variable. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to selecting the appropriate independent variables to include in the analysis, to ensure that the results are accurate and meaningful.

To learn more about Dependent :

https://brainly.com/question/25223322

#SPJ11

It will take approximately 18.5 years for the balance to reach $1826.837.

We have,

We can start by using the formula for continuous compound interest:

[tex]A = Pe^{rt}[/tex]

where A is the ending balance, P is the principal, r is the annual interest rate, and t is the time in years.

For the first scenario, we have:

A = 51333.35

P = 1000

t = 8

Solving for r, we get:

r = (1/t) x ln (A/P)

r = (1/8) x ln (51333.35/1000)

r = 0.0817

So the annual interest rate is approximately 8.17%.

Now we can use this rate to solve for the time it takes to reach a balance of $1826.837:

A = 1826.837

P = 1000

r = 0.0817

[tex]A = Pe^{rt}[/tex]

[tex]1826.837 = 1000e^{0.0817t}[/tex]

Dividing both sides by 1000 and taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(1.826837) = 0.0817t

t = ln(1.826837)/0.0817

t ≈ 18.5 years

Therefore,

It will take approximately 18.5 years for the balance to reach $1826.837.

Learn more about compound interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/13155407

#SPJ4

The answer is not listed, but the correct answer is E, the limit exists and is equal to 3.

To evaluate the limit of 3cos(π/2x - π) as x approaches π/2, we can use the fact that the cosine function is continuous. This means that the limit of cos(π/2x - π) as x approaches π/2 is equal to cos(π/2(π/2) - π) = cos(0) = 1.

Then, we can multiply both sides of the equation by 3:

lim x->π/2 3cos(π/2x - π) = 3cos(π/2x - π) * lim x->π/2 1

Since the limit of 1 as x approaches π/2 is equal to 1, we can substitute:

lim x->π/2 3cos(π/2x - π) * lim x->π/2 1 = 3 * 1 = 3

Therefore, the limit exists and is equal to 3. The answer is not listed, but the correct answer is E, the limit exists and is equal to 3.

To learn more about approaches visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18721465

#SPJ11

nswer:

Ronaldo will pay 3265.5 amount of his income as income tax

Step-by-step explanation:

Ronaldo income is 46650,

he pays 7%of his income as income tax

so,

46650%7 is 3265.5

Step-by-step explanation:

7% of 46650 is his tax      7% is .07 in decimal

.07 * $ 46650 = $ 3265.50  tax

To import the data file DATA1.xls into STATA, you can use the command "import excel using [filename]", where [filename] is the name of the file. To check the structure of the dataset, you can use the command "browse", which will display the data in a spreadsheet format. To report the number of observations in the dataset, you can use the command "count".

The unique identifier in the dataset would depend on the variables included, but it could be a student ID or a school ID. To check if the 'name' variable is clean, the quickest way would be to use the command "tab name, missing", which will show any missing values in the variable. To compute summary statistics for the sample, you can use the command "summarize". To report the maximum value in attendance for each school, you can use the command "by school: summarize attendance, detail". To construct the variable men with value 1 for female observations and 0 for male observations and label it "Female yes/no", you can use the command "generate men = (gender == "Female")". To tabulate the number of males and females in the sample, you can use the command "tabulate gender". Finally, to change the variable label of math to "students math score", you can use the command "label variable math "students math score"".

Learn more about spreadsheet here:

https://brainly.com/question/8284022

#SPJ11

The conclusion is that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 29 percent. The correct option is c. part.

Based on the given information that the null hypothesis was not rejected, it means that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that more than 29 percent of the professional population suffers from problems due to extreme shyness. The null hypothesis typically assumes that there is no significant difference or effect, in this case, the proportion of the professional population suffering from extreme shyness is not greater than 29 percent.

Therefore, the conclusion is that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 29 percent.

To learn more about proportion here:

brainly.com/question/17025342#

#SPJ11

The solution of the initial value problem is 7c SIN u + 7COS u + (1 - 7c COS(u - θ))

In mathematics, an initial value problem (IVP) is a type of differential equation where you are given the derivative of a function at some initial value, and you have to find the function itself.

Now, let's look at the specific IVP that you have been given:

f'(u) = 7(c COS u - sin u)

f(t) = 1

Here, the function f is a function of the variable u, not t, so we will use u instead of t in our solution.

To solve this IVP, we first need to integrate both sides of the equation with respect to u.

∫ f'(u) du = ∫ 7(c COS u - sin u) du

Using the fact that the integral of the derivative of a function is just the function itself, we get:

f(u) = 7c SIN u + 7COS u + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Now, we can use the initial condition f(u) = 1 to solve for C:

1 = 7c SIN u + 7COS u + C

We can rewrite this equation as:

C + 7c SIN u + 7COS u = 1

To simplify this equation, we can use the identity:

7c SIN u + 7COS u = 7c COS(u - θ)

where θ is the angle whose cosine is C/√(c² + 1).

Using this identity, we get:

C + 7c COS(u - θ) = 1

Solving for C, we get:

C = 1 - 7c COS(u - θ)

Substituting this value of C back into our earlier equation for f(u), we get the final solution:

f(u) = 7c SIN u + 7COS u + (1 - 7c COS(u - θ))

To know more about initial value problem here

https://brainly.com/question/30547172

#SPJ4

The correct answer is option B, which shows a line going from the point (0, 60) to the point (3, 120).

How to find amount?

Let's start by finding out how much money the painter earns for each room painted. The painter pays $60 for supplies, so this amount must be subtracted from the total amount earned. Then, the painter charges $20 for each room painted, so the amount earned for each room painted is $20. Therefore, the total amount earned for painting $n$ rooms can be represented by the equation:

Total amount earned = $20n - $60

Now, we can use this equation to plot the relationship between the amount of money the painter earns and the number of rooms painted. To do this, we can create a coordinate grid with the x-axis labeled "Rooms Painted" and the y-axis labeled "Amount of Money Earned".

Option A shows a line going from the point (0, 60) to the point (3, 0). This line does not accurately represent the relationship between the number of rooms painted and the amount of money earned. The line seems to indicate that the painter earns no money for painting 3 rooms, which is not true.

Option B shows a line going from the point (0, 60) to the point (3, 120). This line accurately represents the relationship between the number of rooms painted and the amount of money earned. The painter earns $60 for supplies and an additional $20 for each room painted, so for 3 rooms painted, the painter earns a total of $120.

Option C shows a line going from the point (0, -60) to the point (3, 0). This line does not accurately represent the relationship between the number of rooms painted and the amount of money earned. The line seems to indicate that the painter starts with a debt of $60, which is not true.

Option D shows a line going from the point (0, -60) to the point (3, -120). This line does not accurately represent the relationship between the number of rooms painted and the amount of money earned. The line seems to indicate that the painter loses money for each room painted, which is not true.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B, which shows a line going from the point (0, 60) to the point (3, 120).

To know more about amount:

brainly.com/question/16629663

#SPJ

The bottom of the ladder will be approximately 19.1 feet from the bottom of the building.

To find how many feet the bottom of the ladder will be from the bottom of the building when you place a 39-foot ladder against the top of a 34-foot building, you can use the Pythagorean theorem.

Here are the steps:

1. Recognize that you have a right triangle, with the building as one leg, the ground as another leg, and the ladder as the hypotenuse.

2. Label the sides:

a = 34 feet (building height), b = distance from the bottom of the ladder to the bottom of the building, and c = 39 feet (ladder length).

3. Apply the Pythagorean theorem:

a² + b² = c²

4. Substitute the values:

34² + b² = 39²
5. Calculate:

1156 + b² = 1521
6. Solve for b²:

b² = 1521 - 1156 = 365
7. Take the square root:

b = √365 ≈ 19.1 feet

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ11

The location (x,0) that will minimize the amount of cable between the 3 towns is  x = 3.46

Consider that call L₁ total distance between Centerville and Springfield and L₂  total distance between Centerville and Shelbyville

Then, the total cable will be L₁ + L₂  

Noted that the length 12 - x  is common to the two distances.

Therefore, total distance  d = ( 12 - x ) + 2 √(x² ) + (6)²  

F(x) = 12 - x + 2*√ ( x² + 36 )

Taking derivatives on both sides of the equation;

F´(x) = -1 + 2 * 1/2 * 2*x/ √( x² + 36 )

F´(x) = - 1 + 2*x / √(x² + 36 )

F´(x) = 0

 -1 +  2*x/ √( x² + 36 ) = 0

Solving for x;

- √ ( x² +  36 ) + 2*x  = 0

- √ ( x² +  36 )  = - 2*x

 √ ( x² +  36 )  =  2*x

Taking squaring both sides;

x² + 36  = 4 x²

3*x² = 36

x² = 12

x =  3,46 m  

( 3,46 , 0 ) is the location for minimun length

Then total amount of cable is:

d  =  12 - 3,46 + 2 * √ (3,46)² + 36

d  = 8,54  + 2 * 6,92

d  = 22,38 m

Take the second derivative of F

F´´(x) = 0 + D/ dx (  2*x/ √( x² + 36 ) )

F´´(x) = [ 2*√( x² + 36 )  - 2*x [ x/√ ( x² + 36 ) ] / (x² + 36)

We can see that expression is an integer positive, since the second term is always smaller than the first one then we have a minimun for x = 3,46

The complete question is;

Centerville is located at (12,0) in the x -plane, Springfield is at (0,6) , and Shelbyville is at (0,−6) . The cable runs from Centerville to some point (x,0) on the x-axis where it splits into two branches going to Springfield and Shelbyville. Find the location (x,0) that will minimize the amount of cable between the 3 towns and compute the amount of cable needed.

Learn more about location

https://brainly.com/question/19484439

#SPJ4

The recursive sequence that produces the sequence 4, -6, 4 is:

4, -6, 4, -6, 4, ...

A function that refers back to itself is referred to as a recursive sequence. Here are a few recursive sequence examples. Because f (x) defines itself using f, f (x) = f (x 1) + 2 is an illustration of a recursive sequence.

To generate the sequence 4, -6, 4 using a recursive sequence, we can use the following formula:

[tex]a_n = a_{n-1} + (-1)^{n+1} * 10[/tex]

where [tex]a_n[/tex] is the nth term of the sequence.

Using this formula, we get:

[tex]a_1 = 4\\a_2 = 4 + (-1)^{2+1} * 10 = -6\\a_3 = -6 + (-1)^{3+1} * 10 = 4[/tex]

Therefore, the recursive sequence that produces the sequence 4, -6, 4 is:

4, -6, 4, -6, 4, ...

Learn more about recursive sequence on:

https://brainly.com/question/30234179

#SPJ1

A probability distribution is a function that describes the likelihood of different outcomes in a random event or experiment.

(a) To find the distribution of R-n, we first need to find the joint distribution of the sample. Let Y = log(X), then the density function of Y is given by:

g(y) = f(e^y) * |(dx/dy)| = (1/2) * e^(-e^y) * e^y = (1/2) * e^(-e^y)

for y > 0.

Then the joint density function of Y1, Y2, ..., Yn is given by:

g(y1, y2, ..., yn) = ∏ g(yi) = (1/2^n) * exp(-∑ e^yi), y1 > 0, y2 > 0, ..., yn > 0.

Let Z = min(Y1, Y2, ..., Yn) and W = Y1 + Y2 + ... + Yn. Then we have:

Z = min(Y1, Y2, ..., Yn) = Y(n+1) (since Y is a decreasing function of X)

W = Y1 + Y2 + ... + Yn

Note that W follows the gamma distribution with shape parameter n and scale parameter 1, since the density function of Y is the same as the exponential distribution with mean 1. Thus,

fW(w) = (1/Γ(n)) * w^(n-1) * e^(-w)

for w > 0.

Now we can use the probability distribution transformation method to find the distribution of R-n = (n-1)W/Z:

First, we need to find the joint density function of W and Z:

g(w, z) = g(y1, y2, ..., yn) * |(dy1dy2...dyn/dwdz)|

= (1/2^n) * exp(-w) * n * e^(-z) * (e^z)^(n-1) * [(n-1)e^z]^(n-2) * e^z * [(n-1)e^z - w]^(1-n)

= n(n-1) * e^(-w-z) * w^(n-2) * z^(-n+1) * [(n-1)e^z - w]^(1-n), w < z/(n-1)

Then, we can find the distribution of R-n as follows:

P(R-n < r) = P((n-1)W/Z < r)

= P(W < rZ/(n-1))

= ∫∫g(w, z)dw dz, 0 < w < rZ/(n-1), w < z/(n-1)

After integrating out w, we get:

P(R-n < r) = ∫r/(n-1)^2 z^n e^-z/n dz, 0 < z < ∞

= 1 - Γ(n, r/(n-1)),

where Γ(a, x) is the upper incomplete gamma function.

Therefore, the distribution of R-n is a beta distribution with parameters (n-1, 1):

fR-n(r) = (n-1) * (1-r)^(n-2), 0 < r < 1.

(b) The order statistics of a sample of size n from an exponential distribution with mean β have the following joint density function:

g(x1, x2, ..., xn) = n!/β^n * exp(-∑ xi/β) * I(xi < x(i+1)), for x1 > 0, x2 > x1, ..., xn > xn-1.

where I(.)

learn about probability distribution,

https://brainly.com/question/23286309

#SPJ11

The composition of transformations below  will map figure K onto figure S and then onto figure U  is Translation and clockwise rotation.

Therefore option A is correct.

What is a transformation?

A transformation in mathematics is described as a general term for four specific ways to manipulate the shape and/or position of a point, a line, or geometric figure.

We take a good look at the  given a couple of transformations:

first is figure K:

We will take one vertex (3, 3) of the figure K and have the corresponding vertex in the figure S is (2, 0)

So there is a movement 1 unit left and 3 units down which  formed the figure S.

This is known as  translation.

We take into consideration  the figure S onto figure U.

We notice that the figure S rotated clockwise direction by 180 degrees and formed the figure U.

In conclusion, taking into consideration the various changes option A) Translation and clockwise rotation is appropriate.

Learn more about  translation at:

https://brainly.com/question/12861087

#SPJ1

#complete question:

Which composition of transformations below will map figure K onto figure S and then onto figure U?

A. translation and clockwise rotation

B. rotation and reflection

C. glide reflection

D. double reflection

The solution of the integral is -1/16 (1/14 (1-t⁸)⁷/₂ - 1/10 (1-t⁸)³/2 + 1/24 (1-t⁸)-¹/₂) + C

To evaluate this integral, we will use a technique called substitution. Let u = 1 - t⁸, then du/dt = -8t⁷, and dt = -du/(8t⁷). Substituting these into the integral, we get:

∫(t³/√(1-t⁸)) dt = -1/8 ∫(t³/√u) du

Next, we can simplify the integrand by using the power rule of exponents. Recall that (aˣ)ⁿ = aⁿˣ, so we have:

-1/8 ∫(t³/√u) du = -1/8 ∫(t³/u¹/₂) du = -1/8 ∫(t³u-¹/₂) du = -1/8 ∫u-¹/₂ t³ dt

Now we can use another substitution, v = u^(1/2), then dv/du = 1/(2u^(1/2)), and we have:

-1/8 ∫u-¹/₂ t³ dt = -1/16 ∫v⁻² (1-v¹⁶)¹/² dv

Substituting this into the integral, we get:

-1/16 ∫v⁻² (1-v¹⁶)¹/² dv = -1/16 ∫(v⁻² (v¹⁵ - 1/2 v⁷ + 1/8 v⁻¹)) dv = -1/16 ∫(v¹³ - 1/2 v⁵ + 1/8 v⁻³) dv

Using the power rule of integration, we can evaluate this integral as:

-1/16 (1/14 v¹⁴ - 1/10 v⁶ + 1/24 v⁻²) + C

Substituting back for v = u¹/² and u = 1 - t⁸, we get:

-1/16 (1/14 (1-t⁸)⁷/₂ - 1/10 (1-t⁸)³/2 + 1/24 (1-t⁸)-¹/₂) + C

Thus, the final answer is:

∫(t³/√(1-t⁸)) dt = -1/16 (1/14 (1-t⁸)⁷/₂ - 1/10 (1-t⁸)³/2 + 1/24 (1-t⁸)-¹/₂) + C

To know more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Evaluate the integral. (Use C for the constant of integration.)

∫t³/√1-t⁸ dt

The best interpretation of the calculated 90% confidence paired-t interval (0.887, 7.493) is:

We are 90% confident that the average difference in the cholesterol levels of the patients sampled is between 0.887 and 7.493.

Option 2 is the correct answer.

The best interpretation of the given 90% confidence paired-t interval is option 2) We are 90% confident that the average difference in the cholesterol levels of the patients sampled is between 0.887 and 7.493.

This interval gives us an estimate of the range of plausible values for the true population mean difference in cholesterol levels before and after administering the drug.

The interval indicates that we are 90% confident that the true mean difference in cholesterol levels falls between 0.887 and 7.493 mg/dL.

Option 2 is the correct answer.

For similar question on interpretation.

https://brainly.com/question/10737299

#SPJ11