The number of golf balls ordered by customers of a pro shop has the following probability distribution.

x P(x)
3 0.14
6 0.29
9 0.86
12 0.11
15 0.10

Find the mean of the probability distribution.

The general antiderivative of the given function is [tex]\frac{2}{15}\left(5x-3\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}-\frac{5}{9}e^{3x}-\frac{7}{x}+C[/tex]

Given that a function f(x) = [tex]\sqrt{5x-3}-\frac{5}{3}e^{3x}\:+\:\frac{7}{x^2}[/tex]

We need to find its antiderivative,

[tex]\int (\sqrt{5x-3}-\frac{5}{3}e^{3x}\:+\:\frac{7}{x^2})dx[/tex]

[tex]=\int \sqrt{5x-3}dx-\int \frac{5}{3}e^{3x}dx+\int \frac{7}{x^2}dx[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{2}{15}\left(5x-3\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}-\frac{5}{9}e^{3x}-\frac{7}{x}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{2}{15}\left(5x-3\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}-\frac{5}{9}e^{3x}-\frac{7}{x}+C[/tex]

Hence, the general antiderivative of the given function is [tex]\frac{2}{15}\left(5x-3\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}-\frac{5}{9}e^{3x}-\frac{7}{x}+C[/tex]

Learn more about antiderivative, click;

https://brainly.com/question/31385327

#SPJ4

a. Null hypothesis: The germination rate is 90% or higher and Alternative hypothesis: The germination rate is less than 90%, b. The critical value for a one-tailed test at the 5% significance level with 99 degrees of freedom is -1.660, c. The relevant test statistic is z = (83/100 - 0.90) / sqrt(0.90*0.10/100) = -1.73. Since -1.73 < -1.660, the test statistic falls in the region of rejection, d. The p-value is P(z < -1.73) = 0.042. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis, e. We reject the claim that the germination rate is 90% or higher.

For the first question:
a. Null hypothesis: The germination rate is 90% or higher.
  Alternative hypothesis: The germination rate is less than 90%.

b. The critical value for a one-tailed test at the 5% significance level with 99 degrees of freedom is -1.660.

c. The relevant test statistic is z = (83/100 - 0.90) / sqrt(0.90*0.10/100) = -1.73. Since -1.73 < -1.660, the test statistic falls in the region of rejection.

d. The p-value is P(z < -1.73) = 0.042. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

e. We reject the claim that the germination rate is 90% or higher.

For the second question:
a. Null hypothesis: The average life of the electric light bulbs is 2000 hours or less.
  Alternative hypothesis: The average life of the electric light bulbs is greater than 2000 hours.

b. The critical value for a one-tailed test at the 2% significance level with 63 degrees of freedom is 2.353.

c. The relevant test statistic is t = (2008 - 2000) / (12.31 / sqrt(64)) = 5.82. Since 5.82 > 2.353, the test statistic falls in the region of rejection.

d. The p-value is P(t > 5.82) < 0.001. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.02, we reject the null hypothesis.

e. We have sufficient evidence to support the manufacturer's claim that the average life of his electric light bulbs is greater than 2000 hours.

To learn more about Null hypothesis, click here:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The radius of the sphere is approximately 2.18 cm.

The volume of the cone is given by:

[tex]V_{cone[/tex] = (1/3) x π x [tex]r^2[/tex] x h

where r is the radius of the base and h is the height.

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]V_{cone[/tex] = (1/3) x π x [tex](2.1)^2[/tex] x 8.4

[tex]V_{cone[/tex] = 37.478 [tex]cm^3[/tex]

Since the cone is melted and recast into a sphere, the volume of the sphere will be equal to the volume of the cone.

Therefore:

[tex]V_{sphere[/tex] = [tex]V_{cone[/tex] = 37.478 [tex]cm^3[/tex]

The volume of a sphere is given by:

[tex]V_{sphere[/tex]  = (4/3) x π x [tex]r^3[/tex]

Substituting the value of [tex]V_{sphere[/tex], we get:

(4/3) x π x [tex]r^3[/tex] = 37.478

Solving for r, we get:

[tex]r^3[/tex] = (3/4) x 37.478/π

[tex]r^3[/tex] = 9.3695

r = 2.18 cm (approx)

For similar question on radius:

https://brainly.com/question/1663922

#SPJ11

The period of the sinusoidal wave is determined as π.

option C.

The period of a sinusoidal wave refers to the length of time it takes for the wave to complete one full cycle. In other words, it is the time it takes for the wave to repeat its pattern.

The period is typically denoted by the symbol "T" and is measured in units of time, such as seconds (s).

Mathematically, the period of a sinusoidal wave can be defined as the reciprocal of its frequency.

T = 1/f

Where;

From the given graph, a complete cycle is made at π, so this is the period of the wave.

Learn more about period here: https://brainly.com/question/29813582

#SPJ1

The general indefinite integral of ∫(x² + 1 + (1/x²+1))dx is (1/3)x³ + x + (1/2)ln|x² + 1| + C

To find the general indefinite integral of ∫(x² + 1 + (1/x²+1))dx, we can use the linearity property of integration and integrate each term separately.

The integral of x² with respect to x is (1/3)x³ + C₁, where C₁ is the constant of integration.

The integral of 1 with respect to x is simply x + C₂, where C₂ is another constant of integration.

To integrate (1/(x²+1)), we can use the substitution method by letting u = x² + 1. Therefore, du/dx = 2x and dx = (1/2x)du. Substituting these expressions, we get:

∫(1/(x²+1))dx = (1/2)∫(1/u)du

= (1/2)ln|u| + C₃

= (1/2)ln|x² + 1| + C₃

where C₃ is another constant of integration.

Therefore, the general indefinite integral of ∫(x² + 1 + (1/x²+1))dx is:

(1/3)x³ + x + (1/2)ln|x² + 1| + C

where C is the constant of integration that accounts for any possible constant differences in the integrals of each term.

In summary, to find the general indefinite integral of a sum of functions, we can integrate each term separately and add up the results, including the constant of integration. When necessary, we can use substitution to simplify the integration process for certain terms.

To learn more about integral click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31606071

#SPJ4

This derivative does not match any of the given options exactly. It's important to verify that the calculations are correct, and in this case, they are. Therefore, none of the provided answer choices are correct.

To find the derivative of the function [tex]f(x) = ln((x^2 + 3)^5 / (2x + 5))[/tex], we'll use the chain rule and the quotient rule.

First, let's set [tex]g(x) = (x^2 + 3)^5[/tex] and h(x) = 2x + 5. Then, f(x) = ln(g(x)/h(x)).

Now, we need to find the derivatives of g(x) and h(x).
[tex]g'(x) = 5(x^2 + 3)^4 * 2x = 10x(x^2 + 3)^4[/tex]
h'(x) = 2

Using the chain rule and the quotient rule, we have:

[tex]f'(x) = (g'(x)h(x) - g(x)h'(x)) / (h(x))^2\\f'(x) = (10x(x^2 + 3)^4 * (2x + 5) - (x^2 + 3)^5 * 2) / (2x + 5)^2[/tex]

This derivative does not match any of the given options exactly. It's important to verify that the calculations are correct, and in this case, they are. Therefore, none of the provided answer choices are correct.

learn more about derivative

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The radius of convergence of the power series is [tex]\frac{|(3.2)(6.5)(32)|}{(23)(26)(9.8)(6.5)(3)(2)} = |0.4|[/tex]

The radius of convergence of the power series, we can use the ratio test.

The ratio of consecutive terms in the series is:

|(3.2)(6.5)(32) / (23)(26)(9.8)(6.5)(3)(2)| = |0.4|

Since the absolute value of this ratio is less than 1, the series converges absolutely.

Therefore, the radius of convergence is infinite.

(B) To show that the function defined by the power series satisfies the differential equation y" + xy = 0, we need to differentiate the power series term by term twice.

Differentiating once, we get:

y' = 3.2 + 2(6.5)(32)x + 3(9.8)(6.5)(32)x^2 + ...

Differentiating again, we get:

y" = 2(6.5)(32) + 2(3)(9.8)(6.5)(32)x + ...

Substituting these into the differential equation, we get:

y" + xy = 2(6.5)(32) + 2(3)(9.8)(6.5)(32)x + ... + x(3.2 + 2(6.5)(32)x + 3(9.8)(6.5)(32)x2 + ...)

= 2(6.5)(32) + (3.2)x + 2(6.5)(32)x2 + 3(9.8)(6.5)(32)x3 + ...

We can see that this expression is equal to 0, which means that the function defined by the power series satisfies the differential equation y" + xy = 0.

= [tex]\frac{|(3.2)(6.5)(32)|}{(23)(26)(9.8)(6.5)(3)(2)} = |0.4|[/tex]

For similar question on radius of convergence:

https://brainly.com/question/31440916

#SPJ11

The exact answer for the surface area of the shape generated by revolving the curve x = 2ˣ/₂ in the interval [0,2] about the y-axis is S = π (4 + ln(17 + 12√2)).

To visualize this, imagine taking the curve x = 2ˣ/₂ and rotating it around the y-axis. This creates a three-dimensional shape, and we want to find the area of its surface. To do this, we can use calculus and the formula for surface area of revolution, which states that the surface area S generated by revolving a curve f(x) around the x-axis in the interval [a,b] is given by:

S = 2π ∫ f(x) √(1 + (f'(x))²) dx

In our case, we are revolving the curve x = 2ˣ/₂ around the y-axis in the interval [0,2]. To use the formula above, we need to express the curve in terms of y instead of x.

We can solve for y in terms of x by taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

y = 2 log₂(x)

So our curve in terms of y is y = 2 log_2(x), or equivalently, x = 2ˣ/₂. Now we can use the formula for surface area of revolution:

S = 2π ∫ x √(1 + (dx/dy)²) dy

To find dx/dy, we can use implicit differentiation:

x = 2ˣ/₂

ln(x) = (y/2) ln(2)

dy/dx = (ln(2)/2) / (1/x)

dy/dx = ln(2) x/2

So (dx/dy)² = (2/ln(2))² / x². Plugging this into the formula for surface area of revolution and evaluating the integral, we get:

S = 2π ∫ 2ˣ/₂ √(1 + (ln(2) x/2)²) dy

S = 2π ∫ 2ˣ/₂ √(1 + (ln(2)²/4) 2ˣ⁻¹) dy

This integral can be evaluated using u-substitution with u = 2ˣ/₂. After making the substitution, we get:

S = 2π ∫√(1 + (ln(2)²/4) u²) du

The exact answer is:

S = π (4 + ln(17 + 12√2))

To know more about area here

https://brainly.com/question/14994710

#SPJ4

Outliers might be explained by factors such as tornadoes in largely rural states causing less property damage or crop damage not being counted as property damage.

Tornado damage from 1950 to 1999, I would need to have access to the data from Table 1.5. However, I can guide you on how to analyze the data and answer the questions.

a) To find the top and bottom five states for tornado damage:

Learn more about Tornado damage

brainly.com/question/14501847

#SPJ11

The value of angle θ between the vectors is 65.9°.

The angle θ between the vectors u and v can be found using the formula θ = cos⁻¹((u·v)/(|u||v|)), where · represents the dot product and | | represents the magnitude of the vector. Plugging in the given values, we get:

u·v = (2)(2) + (-4)(-2) + (2)(4) = 20
|u| = √(2² + (-4)² + 2²) = √24
|v| = √(2² + (-2)² + 4²) = √24

Thus, θ = cos⁻¹(20/(√24)(√24)) ≈ 65.9°.


To find the angle between two vectors, we can use the dot product formula and the magnitude formula. The dot product of two vectors gives us a scalar value that represents the angle between them. The magnitude formula gives us the length of each vector.

By plugging these values into the formula for the angle, we can solve for θ. In this case, we first found the dot product of u and v by multiplying their corresponding components and summing them up.

Then we found the magnitude of each vector using the Pythagorean theorem. Finally, we plugged these values into the formula and used a calculator to find the final answer.

To know more about dot product click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29097076#

#SPJ11

The limit of {an} is L = 3/2.

(a) To show that 0 < an < 2 for all n, we can use induction.

For n = 1, we have a1 = 2, which is between 0 and 2.

Assume that 0 < an < 2 for some n > 1. Then, we have:

an+1 = 3 - an

Since 0 < an < 2, we have 0 < 3 - an < 3 - 0 = 3 and 2 > 3 - an > 0. Therefore, 0 < an+1 < 2.

By induction, we conclude that 0 < an < 2 for all n.

(b) To show that the sequence is decreasing, we can use induction.

For n = 1, we have a2 = 3 - a1 = 3 - 2 = 1. Since a2 < a1, the sequence is decreasing at n = 1.

Assume that an+1 < an for some n > 1. Then, we have:

an+2 = 3 - an+1

Since an+1 < an and 0 < an < 2, we have 2 > an+1 > 0 and 2 > an > 0. Therefore, 1 > an+2 > -1.

Since an+2 < an+1, we conclude that the sequence is decreasing.

(c) To show that {an} converges, we can observe that it is a decreasing sequence that is bounded below by 0.

Therefore, it must converge to some limit L.

Taking the limit of both sides of the recursive formula an+1 = 3 - an as n approaches infinity, we have:

L = 3 - L

Solving for L, we get L = 3/2.

L = 3/2.

For similar question on limit:

https://brainly.com/question/31402427

#SPJ11

The probability that a single randomly selected value is between 201 and 205.3 is approximately 0.1615, or when rounded to four decimal places, 0.1615.

To answer your question, we'll first need to standardize the given values using the Z-score formula:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
Where Z is the Z-score, X is the value, μ is the population mean (p), and σ is the standard deviation (o).
First, find the Z-scores for 201 and 205.3:
Z1 = (201 - 202.9) / 10.5 ≈ -0.1810
Z2 = (205.3 - 202.9) / 10.5 ≈ 0.2286
Next, we need to find the probability corresponding to these Z-scores. You can do this by using a Z-table or a calculator with a built-in normal distribution function.
Using a Z-table or calculator, we find:
P(Z1) ≈ 0.4282
P(Z2) ≈ 0.5897
Now, to find the probability between Z1 and Z2:
P(201 < X < 205.3) = P(Z2) - P(Z1) ≈ 0.5897 - 0.4282 ≈ 0.1615
So, the probability that a single randomly selected value is between 201 and 205.3 is approximately 0.1615, or when rounded to four decimal places, 0.1615.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Based on the given probabilities, events A and B are not disjoint (i.e., they can occur simultaneously) but are also not independent (i.e., the occurrence of one event affects the probability of the other event). So, the correct answer is D) neither disjoint nor independent.

Disjoint events are events that cannot occur simultaneously. In this case, if events A and B were disjoint, it would mean that P(A and B) would be equal to zero, as both events cannot happen at the same time. However, given that P(A and B) is not equal to zero (P(A and B) = -0.16), events A and B are not disjoint.

Independent events are events where the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the other event. Mathematically, two events A and B are independent if P(A and B) = P(A) × P(B). However, in this case, P(A and B) = -0.16, while P(A) × P(B) = (-0.8) × 0.2 = -0.16, which means events A and B are not independent.

Therefore, based on the given probabilities, events A and B are not disjoint (as P(A and B) is not zero) and are also not independent (as P(A and B) is not equal to P(A) × P(B)). Hence, the correct answer is D) neither disjoint nor independent.

To learn more about probabilities here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

To differentiate implicitly [tex]d^2y/dx^2 = (1/\sqrt(x^2-5)) - (x^2/(x^2-5)^{(3/2)})[/tex]

To differentiate implicitly, we take the derivative of both sides of the equation with respect to x using the chain rule:

[tex]d/dx (x^2 - y^2) = d/dx (5)[/tex]

For the left-hand side, we have:

[tex]d/dx (x^2 - y^2) = d/dx (x^2) - d/dx (y^2)[/tex]

[tex]= 2x - 2y dy/dx[/tex]

For the right-hand side, we have:

[tex]d/dx (5) = 0[/tex]

Substituting these into the original equation, we get:

[tex]2x - 2y dy/dx = 0[/tex]

To solve for dy/dx, we isolate the term involving dy/dx:

[tex]2y dy/dx = 2x[/tex]

[tex]dy/dx = 2x / 2y[/tex]

[tex]= x / y[/tex]

The implicit derivative of the given equation is:

[tex]dy/dx = x / y.[/tex]

To find[tex]d^2y/dx^2[/tex], we differentiate again with respect to x using the quotient rule:

[tex]d/dx (dy/dx) = d/dx (x/y)[/tex]

[tex]= (1/y) d/dx (x) - (x/y^2) d/dx (y)[/tex]

The implicit derivative we found earlier, we can substitute.[tex]y^2 = x^2 - 5[/tex] into the equation to obtain:

[tex]d/dx (dy/dx) = (1/y) - (x/y^2) dy/dx[/tex]

[tex]= (1/y) - (x/y^2) (x/y)[/tex]

[tex]= (1/y) - (x^2/y^3)[/tex]

Substituting y² = x² - 5, we get:

[tex]d^2y/dx^2 = (1/\sqrt(x^2-5)) - (x^2/(x^2-5)^{(3/2)})[/tex]

For similar questions on implicitly

https://brainly.com/question/25630111

#SPJ11

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

Regarding resolving the given issue, we have The area of the wooden frame alone, without the border and the image, is: 40.855 square inches are equal to (20.57 + 2) (10.5 + 2) - 215.985.

A mathematical equation is a formula that connects two claims and uses the equals symbol (=) to denote equivalence. An equation in algebra is a mathematical statement that establishes the equivalence of two mathematical expressions. For instance, in the equation 3x + 5 = 14, the equal sign places a space between the variables 3x + 5 and 14. The relationship between the two sentences that are written on each side of a letter may be understood using a mathematical formula. The symbol and the single variable are frequently the same. as in, 2x - 4 equals 2, for instance.

Let x represent the image's height in inches on its own. In such case, the image's width is 8.5 inches.

The height of the border and picture together is x + 2 inches, and the width is 8.5 + 2 = 10.5 inches since their combined measurements are 2 inches more than the picture's individual proportions.

The framed image has a 216 square inch surface area, including the border and the image, thus we have:

Height and breadth are equal to 216 (x + 2) by 10.5 and 216 (x + 2) by 20.57 by 18.57.

Therefore, the picture's height alone is around 18.57 inches, while the border and picture as a whole measure 20.57 inches by 10.5 inches.

The full framed image's area, including the border and the image itself, is:

20.57 x 10.5 = 215.985 x 216 for height and breadth

The area of the image and the area of the border must be subtracted from the overall area of the framed picture in order to get the area of only the wooden frame.

The image measures 8.5 x 18.57 inches, or 158.145 square inches.

The distance between the picture's actual size and the border's size is the area of the border:

157.145 minus 215.985 equals 57.84 square inches.

The area of the wooden frame alone, without the border and the image, is:

40.855 square inches are equal to (20.57 + 2) (10.5 + 2) - 215.985.

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

The rate at which the lateral surface area increases when h = 15m and r = 5m is 60π square meters per second or approximately 188.5 square meters per second.

To find the rate at which the lateral surface area of the cylinder increases, we need to use the formula for the lateral surface area of a cylinder:

Lateral Surface Area = 2πrh

We can use the chain rule to find the rate of change of the lateral surface area with respect to time:

dL/dt = d/dt(2πrh) = 2π(r dh/dt + h dr/dt)

where dh/dt is the rate at which the height is increasing (3 m/s) and

dr/dt is the rate at which the radius is increasing (1 m/s).

Substituting h = 15 m and r = 5 m, we get:

dL/dt = 2π(5(3) + 15(1)) = 2π(15 + 15) = 60π

Therefore, the rate at which the lateral surface area increases when h = 15m and r = 5m is 60π square meters per second or approximately 188.5 square meters per second.

for such more question on  surface area

https://brainly.com/question/27987869

#SPJ11

The correct range for the P-value is 0.05 < P-value < 0.10.

(a) To compute the test statistic, use the formula t = (x - μ) / (s / √n), where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size. In this case, x = 18.2, μ = 20, s = 4, and n = 16. Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (18.2 - 20) / (4 / √16) = (-1.8) / (4 / 4) = -1.8 / 1 = -1.80 (rounded to two decimal places)

(b) Since the alternative hypothesis is Hu < 20, the shaded region will be to the left of the test statistic in the t-distribution.

(c) To approximate the P-value, we can use a t-distribution table or a calculator. The test statistic is -1.80, and the degrees of freedom (df) for this problem are n - 1 = 16 - 1 = 15. Looking up the values in a t-table, we find that the P-value falls between 0.05 and 0.10.

Know more about P-value here:

https://brainly.com/question/30182084

#SPJ11

Answer:

6.25ft!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Investing $10,000 at 4% interest for 10 years will yield $14,802.47 with continuous compounding, and $14,563.92 with monthly compounding. The difference is approximately $238.55.

To calculate the difference in the final amounts under continuous compounding versus monthly compounding, we can use the formula for compound interest

For continuous compounding[tex]A = Pe^{rt}[/tex]

For monthly compounding [tex]A = P(1 + r/12)^{12t}[/tex]

where

A is the amount after t years

P is the principal amount invested (in this case, $10,000)

r is the annual interest rate (in this case, 4% or 0.04)

t is the number of years

Using these formulas, we can calculate the amount after 10 years under continuous compounding

[tex]A_{continuous = 10000e^{0.0410} = $14,802.47[/tex]

And under monthly compounding

[tex]A_{monthly = 10000(1 + 0.04/12)^{12*10} = $14,563.92[/tex]

The difference in the final amounts is

[tex]A_{continuous} - A_{monthly} = 238.55[/tex]

Therefore, if the interest is compounded continuously, the investment will earn approximately $238.55 more than if it is compounded monthly over a period of 10 years.

To know more about compound interest:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ4

By using benchmark fractions to compare 5/6 and4/10 we can say that  5/6 is greater than 4/10.

To compare 5/6 and 4/10 using benchmark fractions, we need to find a benchmark fraction that is close to each of these fractions.

For 5/6, we can use the benchmark fraction 1/2. Since 1/2 is less than 5/6, we know that 5/6 is more than 1/2.

For 4/10, we can use the benchmark fraction 1/3. Since 1/3 is greater than 4/10, we know that 4/10 is less than 1/3.

So, we can say that 5/6 is more than 1/2 and 4/10 is less than 1/3. Therefore, we can conclude that 5/6 is greater than 4/10.

To know more about benchmark fractions:

https://brainly.com/question/8829934

#SPJ4

This statement is true. The kurtosis of a distribution is a measure of the shape of the distribution and specifically refers to how peaked or flat it is in the middle compared to a normal distribution.

A positive kurtosis indicates a more peaked distribution while a negative kurtosis indicates a flatter distribution.
The kurtosis of a distribution refers to the relative flatness or peakedness in the middle of the distribution. It is a measure used to describe the shape of a probability distribution, with higher kurtosis indicating a more peaked distribution and lower kurtosis indicating a flatter distribution.

Know more about kurtosis here:

https://brainly.com/question/14799350

#SPJ11

The answer is D) 5/4.

To find the limit of the given function as x approaches 2, we can plug the value of 2 directly into the function. However, since the denominator of the function becomes 0 when x=2, we need to simplify the function first.

(x^2 + x - 6)/(x^2 - 4) can be factored as [(x+3)(x-2)]/[(x+2)(x-2)].

We can then cancel out the common factor of (x-2) in the numerator and denominator, leaving us with (x+3)/(x+2) as the simplified function.

Now, we can plug in the value of 2 into this simplified function:

limx→2 (x+3)/(x+2)

= (2+3)/(2+2)

= 5/4

Therefore, the answer is D) 5/4.

Learn more about rational function.

brainly.com/question/27914791

#SPJ11

the answer is minimum value of (3,4)

Answer:

see image

Step-by-step explanation:

Use a calculator to change each radicals to a decimal. (These are all rounded)

sqrt2 = 1.4

sqrt5 = 2.2

sqrt8 = 2.8

sqrt9 = 3

sqrt15 = 3.9

sqrt22 = 4.7

Then you can put them on the numberline. Remember, exactly half way between the numbers on the numberline is .5

The hypothesis test involves a sampling distribution of means that is a Student t distribution.

To determine whether the hypothesis test involves a sampling distribution of means that is a normal distribution, Student t distribution, or neither, let's consider the provided information: Claim: μ = 78. Sample data: n = 24, s = 15.3. The sample data appear to come from a population that is normally distributed, and σ is unknown.

Since the population is normally distributed and the population standard deviation (σ) is unknown, we should use the Student t distribution for this hypothesis test. The reason is that when the population is normally distributed but σ is unknown, the t distribution is more appropriate than the normal distribution, especially for smaller sample sizes (n < 30).

Since the population standard deviation  is unknown, and the sample size is small (n = 24), the appropriate distribution to use for this hypothesis test is the Student t-distribution. The t-distribution is used when the sample size is small and the population standard deviation is unknown. Therefore, the hypothesis test involves a sampling distribution of means that is a Student t-distribution.

So, the hypothesis test involves a sampling distribution of means that is a Student t distribution.

To know more about "Hypothesis test" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14587073#

#SPJ11

Answer:

5:2:7

Step-by-step explanation:

First we need to find the greatest common factor between 115, 46, and 161 which is 23

Next we need to divide 115, 46, and 161 by 23

115 ÷ 23 = 5

46 ÷ 23 = 2

161 ÷ 23 = 7

So, the simplified ratio is 5:2:7

Hope this helps!

The standard error of the sample means is 17.333 psi.

To find the standard error of the sample mean, we will use the following formula:
Standard Error (SE) = σ / √n
where σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size. In your case, we have:
μ = 2498 psi (mean)
σ = 52 psi (standard deviation)
n = 9 (sample size)
Now, let's calculate the standard error:
SE = 52 / √9
SE = 52 / 3
SE = 17.333 psi
Rounding to three decimal places, we get:
The standard error of the sample means is 17.333 psi.

Note: The standard error (SE) is a measure of the variability or precision of a sample statistic, usually the mean, compared to the true population parameter.

It is the estimated standard deviation of the sampling distribution of a statistic, such as the mean, based on a finite sample size. The SE is calculated by dividing the standard deviation of the population by the square root of the sample size.

Standard deviation (SD) is a measure of the amount of variability or dispersion in a set of data.

It is the square root of the variance, which is calculated by taking the average of the squared differences between each data point and the mean of the dataset.

For similar question on sample.

https://brainly.com/question/27829028

#SPJ11

The best estimate of the total distance the student's car traveled before coming to rest is about 840 feet.

To estimate the total distance the student's car traveled before coming to rest, we will use the left and right Riemann sums to approximate the integral of the velocity function over the interval [0, 20]. The velocity function is given by the data in the table:

t (seconds)   v (ft/s)

----------------------

 0             96

 2             88

 4             76

 6             62

 8             46

10             28

12             10

14             0

16             0

18             0

20             0

To use the left Riemann sum, we will use the velocity values from the first column of the table, and for the right Riemann sum, we will use the velocity values from the second column of the table.

The width of each subinterval is 2 seconds, since the data is given at 2-second intervals.

Using the left Riemann sum, we get:

distance = sum of (velocity x time interval)

= 96(2) + 88(2) + 76(2) + 62(2) + 46(2) + 28(2) + 10(2) + 0(2) + 0(2) + 0(2)

= 920

Using the right Riemann sum, we get:

Taking the average of these two estimates, we get:

distance ≈ (920 + 760)/2

≈ 840

Rounding to the nearest integer, we get the final estimate:

distance ≈ 840 feet

Therefore, the best estimate of the total distance the student's car traveled before coming to rest is about 840 feet.

To learn more about Rounding visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29878750

#SPJ11

We can be 95% confident that the true proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin during the 2014-2015 influenza season is between 0.46 and 0.58.

What is algebra?

Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with mathematical operations and symbols used to represent numbers and quantities in equations and formulas.

To calculate a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin, you should use a confidence interval for a single proportion. The requirements for using this procedure are:

Random sampling: The participants in the study should be randomly selected from the population of interest. In this case, the participants were randomly selected from 2321 individuals with respiratory illness.

Independence: The participants in the study should be independent of each other. In other words, the response of one participant should not affect the response of another participant. In this case, it is assumed that the participants are independent of each other.

Sample size: The sample size should be sufficiently large. A commonly used rule of thumb is that both the number of successes and failures in the sample should be at least 10. In this case, the number of vaccinated patients is 203, and the number of unvaccinated patients is 187. Both of these numbers are greater than 10.

Under these assumptions, you can use a normal approximation to calculate the confidence interval for the proportion of vaccinated patients. The formula for the confidence interval is:

p ± zsqrt(p(1-p)/n)

where p is the sample proportion of vaccinated patients, z is the critical value from the standard normal distribution for a 95% confidence interval (which is approximately 1.96), and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the numbers from the study, we get:

p = 203/390 = 0.52

n = 390

So the confidence interval for the proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin is:

0.52 ± 1.96sqrt(0.52(1-0.52)/390)

= 0.46 to 0.58

Therefore, we can be 95% confident that the true proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin during the 2014-2015 influenza season is between 0.46 and 0.58.

To learn more about algebra from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/24875240

#SPJ1