Answer:
All citizens have basic rights
Answer:
The answer is (A) All citizens have basic rights
Explanation:
When the British couldn’t control Gandhi, what did they usually do with him?
Answer:
At times he was put in jail/prison and I have read that at other times he was simply ignored. There were several violent movements going on in the Country of India at the time so Gandhi's peaceful movement really didn't draw a lot of attention from the British.
Explanation:
Answer:
he was arrested for writing articles advocating resistance.
Explanation:
Why was the United States concerned when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990?
O A. They wanted to preserve the Kuwaiti royal family
B. They wanted to protect their interests in Iraqi banks
C. They wanted to protect their investments in oil
D. They wanted to protect their interests in Middle Eastern food
The answer is C, as there was concerns over oil that United States was part of.
The United States was concerned when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990 as They wanted to protect their investments in oil. Thus, option C is correct.
What is invasion?A foreign nation or territory is invaded when someone joins it with the intention of forcibly capturing it or winning it. It might have a military bent or incorporate goals related to politics, the economy, or culture. A single nation or a collection of nations may carry it out.
Iraq attacked Kuwait, a nation southeast of it, in an effort to increase its control over the Middle East's wealthy supply of petroleum. Saddam Hussein was compelled to evacuate Iraqi soldiers from Kuwait upon request by the United States alongside the Security Council of the United Nations, however, Hussein refused.
Therefore, option C is the correct option.
Learn more about invasion, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14449918
#SPJ5
Which statement explains the irony of Harburg's description of the bread line?
Answer:
He was eating and living wellwhile the other people had to stand in bread lines to get food
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Analyze this document by providing its HIPP: Historical context, Intended audience, author’s Purpose, and author’s Point of view.
Recalling the Schoolchildren’s Blizzard of 1888, ca 1930s
20 points!
HIPP is a strategy used to analyze a text in-depth, allowing the understanding of various elements of that text.
Based on this, we can show the HIPP of "Recalling the Schoolchildren's Blizzard of 1888," as follows:
Historical context: The text shows the three months when a violent snowstorm hit South Dakota, killing many people, especially children who were hit on their way home after a day of school.Intended audience: The text does not have a specific target audience, being attractive to any curious reader or scholar who wants to know about this period and the harm caused by it.Author's Purpose: The author's purpose is to inform about this event, showing the problems it caused and what impact it had on society.Author's Point of view: In this case, the author has a very expository point of view, where he presents information, descriptions, reports, and other elements that reinforce the information he is presenting.More information:
https://brainly.com/question/14205061?referrer=searchResults
A violation of the Ninth Amendment would be
Answer:
someone forced to incriminate themselves in court or the government denying the right to privacy because it is not in the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
the ninth amendment addresses rights, retained by the people, that are not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.
Answer:
B. the government denying the right to privacy because it´s not listed in the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
What concession did the United States receive from North Vietnam in the Paris Peace Accords? the retreat of North Vietnamese troops a role in the government of South Vietnam the right to station troops in South Vietnam the return of American POWs
Answer:
In the Paris Peace Accords, the United States received the return of American POWs from North Vietnam.
Explanation:
The Paris Peace Accords between North Vietnam and the United States were signed in that city of France on January 23, 1973, and signified the end of American participation in the Vietnam War, as well as the virtual and later effective victory. of the communist side on South Vietnam in this conflict.
Among the most important agreements of the treaty, the United States pledged to dismantle all its military installations and to withdraw all its troops, in addition to cutting support for South Vietnam and ceasing its incursions into North Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. In return, North Vietnam pledged to hand over to the United States all prisoners of war taken during the conflict.
How did the Black Panther Party's approach to the Civil Rights movement differ from that of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee?
1 The Black Panthers were more interested in ending economic oppression than legal segregation.
2The Black Panthers excluded many African Americans rather than working to be as inclusive as possible.
3The Black Panthers focused on protecting African Americans from white violence rather than ending segregation.
4 The Black Panthers used violence to force rapid desegregation rather than civil disobedience to bring it about slowly.
Answer:
The Black Panthers used violence to force rapid desegregation rather than civil disobedience to bring it about slowly.
why was the cuban missile crisis so dangerous
Answer:
There were many missle sites being built by the Soviet missles.
Explanation:
Come on; missles are extremely dangerous.
How did World War I contribute to the rise and of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany?
What is the meaning of the word “swell”
Answer: to grow, or increase in size
Explanation:
Answer: become larger or rounder in size
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton, and his idea of a central
bank, was supported by the
party.
Federalists
Anti-Federalists
Answer:
federal
Explanation:
he believed in people who had talents.
Answer:
FederalistsExplanation:
The Federalist Party:
Largely influenced by the ideas of Alexander Hamilton, the Federalists succeeded in convincing the Washington administration to assume national and state debts, pass tax laws, and create a central bank. ... Jefferson and his colleagues formed the Republican Party in the early 1790s.
What is a political ideology that emphasized
nationalism, aggressive expansion, racism and violence and lacked any
personal rights.
Answer:
you could say the 'white power' or 'white supremacy' ideology. They are known for their racist beliefs and raging pride in their nationality. Many also believe that they are the superior race.
You could also say fascism for the same reasons but they are commonly a form of government.
The expansion of Islam resulted in European expansion how?
Answer:
The expansion of Islam resulted in European expansion in which of the following ways a. Europeans sought to convert new people to Christianity to counteract Islamic influence. ... Europeans were compelled to search for sea trade routes to Asia to avoid crossing Islamic lands.
Explanation:
Why might violence be tempting to activists? Why might it be risky to their movements?
Answer:
We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.
Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.
Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.
Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.
Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.
Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.
Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.
Explanation:
Violence might be tempting to activist because it can give desired result in less time and could make life after it easier. It might be riskier because violence demands bloodshed.
Activist and ViolenceThe role of violence in Activist movements historically has given mixed results, while some movement became successful like Bolshevik Revolution or English Revolution, the other like Indian National Movement were not so much successful because of the role of violence.
For Activist violence is tempting because it is the easier way to attract the interest of the masses, and it could help in making revolution.
But the role of violence in activist movements are always riskier as it can lead to death, bloodshed, and civil unrest.
Learn more about Role of Activists here:
https://brainly.com/question/1565393
How was Sam Houston able to solve the problem of the unrest in the Texas army after the Texas Revolution?
a.
Houston added the Texas Rangers as a unit in the army.
b.
Houston paid all the veterans and equipped them with better artillery.
c.
Houston reduced the size of the army by sending the soldiers on leave.
d.
Houston increased the requirements that need to be met before anyone can join the army.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think its B.
Explanation:
It may be B because i dont think Sam Houston would do c.Houston reduced the size of the army by sending the soldiers on leave.
d.Houston increased the requirements that need to be met before anyone can join the army. And I don’t think he would do A either i think he would find a way like through B and paid all the veterans and equipped them with better artillery. there wanting to solve the problem and fix the issues between them so paying them and making them feel nice and useful would most likely be best.
Which of the following statements describes a primary difference between democratic and communist governments?
A Only democratic governments distribute land to citizens and make decisions about the economy
B. Only democratic governments have complete control of both the economic and political systems,
COnly communist governments have complete control of both the economic and political systems
D. Only communist governments use popular elections to determine who serves as a government
official
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Communist governments control the economic and political systems of their countries.
Answer:
C. Only communist governments have complete control of both the economic and political systems.
Explanation:
I just did the test in edg
Why did sun yat sen begin receiving help from the communists
Which nations were part of the Triple Alliance?
Austria-Hungary
Britain
France
Germany
the United States
Russia
DONE
what makes the Confederates different from the American colonists
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The major difference between the Confederates and American colonists are:
1. Confederates wants the slavery to continue and rejected the abolishment of Slavery movement, this led to secession and eventually American civil war. While American colonists, rejected the imposition of British taxes, other subsequent trade limitations that were imposed on them, and they also refused to accommodate the British soldiers and as other unfair duies.
2. Confederates had a legal right to secede, as they had agreed and ratified a union constitution that allow any part that wish to secede to do so without the federal government stopping them, while the American colonists had no such legal agreement.
The Confederates different from the American colonists because the Confederates is defined in terms of rebels and the American colonists defines in terms pf patriots.
What are the difference between Confederates and American colonists?(1). The Confederates were also known as the “Rebels” because they desired to break up from the Union government as well as their own government, which was realised as disloyal by the North.
On the another hand, the American colonists were also known as “Patriots” because they desired to acquire independence from Great Britain.
(2). Confederate desires the subjection to proceed and disapproved the termination of Slavery occurrence.
While American colonists, disapproved the enforcement of British taxes, another resulting trade restrictions that were enforced on them.
Therefore, they both are different by their own policies.
Learn more about the Confederates, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11649223
Which advantages of immigration does President Obama Name in this passage? Check all that apply
- helped creat new businesses
- helped boost the nations military
- helped shape the character of the country
- has given us benefit ls that other countries do not have
Answer:
According to Obama, immigration helped create new businesses , helped shape the character of the country , and has given us benefits that other countries do not have .
Explanation:
America has historically been a country of immigrants. All American citizens have at least one ancestor whose origin is not native. Thus, millions of people from all over the world have come to these lands, from the first Mayflower immigrants, through the Irish, Germans, Italians, Mexicans, Cubans, Asians, etc.
Each of the immigrant groups has brought their cultures, idiosyncrasies and ways of living to the country and faces the different challenges of destiny. Thus, each of them has started different ways of earning a living, undertaking through investment and work different companies that have developed the country to become the world's leading economic power. Furthermore, through multiculturalism, they have defined the country's heterogeneous character, which today constitutes a melting pot that drives the country to continue developing.
Answer:
ade
Explanation:
What was the most important reason for US settiers heading west?
Answer: The 19th century movement of settlers into America west, began with the Louisiana purchases and was fueled by the gold rush, the oregon trail and belief in manifest destiny.
What conclusion about life in the United States during World War II can be drawn from this poster? (7 points)
A. Politicians began actively courting the women's vote for the first time.
B. The government felt the need to encourage women to enter the workforce.
C. Women's rights activists began fighting for women's right to serve in combat roles.
D. Labor unions began to accept women as members for the first time.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Hongwu followed the teachings of Confucius by helping the economy grow and
O by building chariots.
O by encouraging exploration
O by allowing women to serve in government.
by making sure that everyone could earn a living,
woid(0)
Tweaks
The correct answer is D. By making sure that everyone could earn a living
Explanation:
Hongwu was the emperor of China from 1368 to 1398. During this period, Hongwu created multiple policies and introduced important changes mainly inspired by the teachings of Confucius, who promoted morality, justice, and correctness. Due to this, Hongwu created policies against corruption, introduced the idea emperors are designated by divine forces and encouraged the economy by promoting agriculture, reducing taxes, and protecting peasants. This last action created justice for peasants and guaranteed everyone in the empire could contribute to the economy and at the same time earn a living.
How did the Mukden Incident advance Japanese imperialism?
O A. It gave Japan an excuse to retaliate against the Chinese and gain
control of Manchuria.
OB. It proved Japan's military strength and convinced the Soviet Union
to become Japan's ally.
O C. It allowed the Japanese navy to gain confidence and take over the
major Chinese port of Shanghai.
D. It preoccupied the French military and let Japan more easily
conquer French Indochina.
The Mukden Incident advance Japanese imperialism it gave Japan an excuse to retaliate against the Chinese and gain control of Manchuria. The correct option is a.
What is imperialism?Imperialism is the state policy, practice, or advocacy of extending power and dominion, especially by direct territorial acquisition or by gaining political and economic control of other areas,often through employing hard power economic and military power but also soft power cultural and diplomatic power. While related to the concepts of colonialism and empire, imperialism is a distinct concept that can apply to other forms of expansion and many forms of government.
The word “imperialism” was originally coined in the 19th century to decry Napoleon’s despotic militarism and became common in the current sense in Great Britain during the 1870s, when it was used with a negative connotation. By the end of the 19th century it was being used to describe the behavior of empires at all times and place.
Hannah Arendt and Joseph Schumpeter defined imperialism as expansion for the sake of expansion.
Learn more about imperialism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1225474
#SPJ7
Age, income, occupation, and education are examples of _____. demographic characteristics psychographic characteristics geographic characteristics behavioral characteristics
Answer:
Demographic Characteristics
Explanation:
Demographic characteristics include age, ethnicity, and education.
Lincoln's attitude about the freeing of the slaves (abolition)
O A.
was mainly negative throughout the war
O B.
was mainly positive throughout the war
O c. became less favorable as the war continued
OD
became increasingly favorable as the war continued
Which of these rights does the 1st Amendment of the Constitution NOT cover?
A: Expression
B: Speech
C: Press
D: Bearing Arms
Answer:
d
Explanation:
the right to bear arms is the second amendment
wich of the following correctly matches the religion to its beliefs?
A) Buddhism- the relationship between the gods and humans is explained in sacred text
B) Hinduism- right speech and right understanding will guide the believer
C) Hinduism- life is suffering
D) Buddhism- follow the middle path to achieve Nirvana
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The basic goal of Buddhism, that is overcoming everyday life's suffering, as well as overcoming the slavish cycle between life and death and attaining Nirvana.
How did the Twenty-Sixth Amendment affect citizenship in the United States?
A. It expanded the definition of citizenship to include voting rights for American Indians.
B. It expanded the definition of citizenship to include voting rights for formerly enslaved people.
C. It expanded the definition of citizenship to include voting rights for younger adults.
D. It expanded the definition of citizenship to include voting rights for women.
The correct answer is: It expanded the definition of citizenship to include voting rights for younger adults.
a- It expanded the definition of citizenship to include voting rights for American Indians.
b-The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery
c-Unratified Amendments:
The Twenty-sixth Amendment (Amendment XXVI) to the United States Constitution prohibits the states and the federal government from using age as a reason for denying the right to vote to citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen years old.
d-The 19th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, passed by Congress on June 4, 1919 and ratified by the states in August 1920, reads: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
During World War I, why was propaganda important for the war efforts?
O Propaganda provided guidance on how civilians could protect themselves.
O Propaganda helped rally support for government war efforts.
O Propaganda encouraged enemy soldiers to surrender.
O Propaganda brought neutral nations into the war.
Save and Exit
Net
S
Mark this and retum
Answer:
B
Explanation:
edge2020
