What magnetic field is necessary for 1. 0 m3 of that field to contain 1. 0 J of energy?

The period of the electromagnetic wave is 5×10⁻¹⁰ seconds

Period is the time taken for a wave to complete one rotation.

To calculate the period of the wave, we use the formula below.

Formula:

Where:

From the question,

Given:

substitute these values equation 1

Learn  more about period here: https://brainly.com/question/29813582

#SPJ1

The new process will cause the demand for book printing services to increase, and this will cause the price of book printing services to fall.

The long-run equilibrium will shift to a new equilibrium, where the new cost structure will be reflected in the price of book printing services. The new process will result in lower prices and higher demand for book printing services, leading to an increase in the number of firms in the book printing industry, as well as an increase in the size of the market.

The cost savings due to the new process will be passed on to consumers, resulting in lower prices for books. This will benefit both the book printing companies as well as the consumers.

Know more about equilibrium here

https://brainly.com/question/30807709#

#SPJ11

The frequency of the wave produced by oscillating one end of the rope up and down 2.0 times a second is also 2.0 Hz (Hertz).

Frequency is defined as the number of oscillations or cycles that a wave completes in one second. In this case, each oscillation of the rope creates one complete cycle of the wave.

Therefore, if the rope is oscillating 2.0 times per second, it is completing 2.0 cycles of the wave each second, which is equivalent to a frequency of 2.0 Hz.

To know more about oscillations, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31472633#

#SPJ11

Tasting water to identify which cup contains salty water or fresh water may not be reliable, as taste can be subjective and some individuals may have a weaker sense of taste.

Another approach is to use a conductivity meter or a multimeter with conductivity measurement capabilities to test the water in each cup. Salty water has a higher conductivity than fresh water due to the presence of ions, so the cup with higher conductivity would contain the salty water.

A third approach is to use a refractometer to measure the refractive index of the water. Salty water has a higher refractive index than fresh water due to the presence of dissolved salts, so the cup with a higher refractive index would contain the salty water.

In summary, to determine which cup contains salty water and which contains fresh water, one can use taste, a conductivity meter, a multimeter with conductivity measurement capabilities, or a refractometer.

Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of method depends on factors such as the resources available and the specific characteristics of the water being tested.

To know more about salty water refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29362135?#

#SPJ11

Answer:Assuming the mass of the spring is not changed, the frequency of the mass-spring system will increase if the length of the spring is cut into one third. This is because the frequency of a mass-spring system is inversely proportional to the square root of the length of the spring. Mathematically, the frequency (f) is given by:

f = 1 / (2π) x √(k/m)

where k is the spring constant and m is the mass of the system. Since the mass of the spring is not changing, if the length of the spring is cut into one third, the square root of the length will become √(1/3) = 0.577. Therefore, the frequency of the system will increase by a factor of 1/0.577, which is approximately 1.73 or √3.

Explanation:

As for the Voltage across the inductor, it is equal to zero after four time constants because the current in the circuit has decreased to zero. Therefore, the correct answer for part (b) is zero, not 0.107.

When the switch is in position 1, the circuit is closed and the battery is connected in series with the inductor and resistor. This means that current flows through the circuit, causing a magnetic field to be generated by the inductor. However, when the switch is suddenly moved to position 2, the circuit is opened and the battery is no longer connected.

After the switch is moved, the current in the circuit begins to decrease due to the inductor's opposition to changes in current. The time it takes for the current to decrease to 36.8% of its original value is known as the time constant, which is calculated by dividing the inductance of the inductor by the resistance of the resistor.

After four time constants, the voltage across the resistor can be calculated using the equation V = V0 * e^(-t/RC), where V0 is the initial voltage, t is the time elapsed, R is the resistance, and C is the capacitance. Plugging in the values given, we get V = 193 * e^(-4/RC) = 3.53 volts.

As for the voltage across the inductor, it is equal to zero after four time constants because the current in the circuit has decreased to zero. Therefore, the correct answer for part (b) is zero, not 0.107.

To Learn More About Voltage

https://brainly.com/question/1176850

SPJ11

The speakers in a sports stadium are 89. 5 m from a fan's seat. It takes approximately 0.261 seconds for sound to travel from the speakers to the fan's seat in the sports stadium.

The time it takes for sound to travel from the speakers to the fan's seat can be calculated using the formula

Time = distance / speed

Where distance is the distance between the speakers and the fan's seat, and speed is the speed of sound in air.

In this case, the distance between the speakers and the fan's seat is 89.5 m, and the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s (at standard temperature and pressure).

Plugging in these values into the formula, we get

Time = 89.5 m / 343 m/s

Time = 0.261 seconds

Therefore, it takes approximately 0.261 seconds for sound to travel from the speakers to the fan's seat in the sports stadium.

To know more about time here

https://brainly.com/question/22594054

#SPJ4

Vibration of an object about an equilibrium point is called simple harmonic motion when the restoring force is proportional to the displacement from the equilibrium point and is directed towards the equilibrium point.

This is known as Hooke's Law, which states that the force exerted by a spring is directly proportional to the displacement of the spring from its equilibrium position.

Mathematically, this can be expressed as F = -kx, where F is the restoring force, x is the displacement from the equilibrium point, and k is the spring constant, a measure of the stiffness of the spring.

To know more about Hooke's Law refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29126957#

#SPJ11

Out of the given options, sandpaper would have the highest friction.

• Wooden surface: Depends on the smoothness of the wood, can range from low to medium friction.

• Glass surface: Very smooth so it has low friction.

• Paper surface: Relatively smooth so friction would be low to medium depending on the paper type.

Using Newton's second law, F = ma, and the known mass of a proton, 1.673 x [tex]10^{27}[/tex] kg, the initial acceleration of the protons would be approximately 1.38 x [tex]10^{1}[/tex] [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex].

If the protons were not held together by the strong nuclear force, they would experience an electric force due to their positive charges.

According to Coulomb's law, the electric force between two charges is proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Therefore, the initial acceleration of the protons would depend on their separation distance and the magnitude of their charges.

Assuming a separation distance of 1 angstrom ([tex]10^{-10}[/tex] m), the electric force between two protons with charges of 1.602 x [tex]10^{-19}[/tex] C would be approximately 2.31 x [tex]10^{-28}[/tex] N.

Using Newton's second law, F = ma, and the known mass of a proton, 1.673 x [tex]10^{-27}[/tex] kg, the initial acceleration of the protons would be approximately 1.38 x [tex]10^{1}[/tex] [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex].

To know more about Newton's second law, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13447525#

#SPJ11

The momentum of an object is directly proportional to its mass and velocity. Therefore, the momentum of the larger truck can be calculated as follows:

Momentum of larger truck = (2 x mass of smaller truck) x (1/2 x velocity of smaller truck)

Momentum of larger truck = (2 x m) x (0.5 x 20)

Momentum of larger truck = m x 20

This shows that the momentum of the larger truck is equal to the momentum of the smaller truck, as the increased mass is balanced by the decreased velocity.

In other words, the momentum of an object depends on both its mass and velocity, and changes in one factor can be compensated by changes in the other factor to maintain the same momentum.

To know more about Momentum, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30677308#

#SPJ11

The cyclist's power output must be equal to 784 N x speed. To climb the same hill at the same speed, the cyclist's power output must be equal to the gravitational force acting on the system (bicycle plus rider) multiplied by the speed at which they are moving.

The gravitational force can be calculated using the formula F = mg, where m is the total mass of the system (80 kg) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]). Therefore, the gravitational force acting on the system is 784 N (80 kg x 9.8 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]).

Assuming that the speed at which they are moving is constant, the power output required by the cyclist can be calculated using the formula P = F x v, where P is power, F is force, and v is velocity (speed). Therefore, the cyclist's power output must be equal to 784 N x speed.

For example, if the speed is 5 m/s, then the power output required by the cyclist would be 3920 watts (784 N x 5 m/s). However, it's important to note that this is a theoretical calculation and in reality, the power output required may be different due to factors such as air resistance, friction, and the gradient of the hill.

To know more about gravitational force, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12528243#

#SPJ11

The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the other planet is approximately 77.98 m/s².

To find the acceleration due to gravity on another planet, we can use the formula:

Weight = Mass × Acceleration due to gravity

On Earth, your weight is given as 742.32 N, and the acceleration due to gravity is 9.80 m/s².

We can rearrange the formula to solve for mass:

Mass = Weight / Acceleration due to gravity

So, on Earth, your mass would be:

Mass on Earth = 742.32 N / 9.80 m/s²

Mass on Earth = 75.63 kg

Now, let's consider the surface of another planet where your weight is given as 5900.91 N.

We'll use the same formula and solve for the acceleration due to gravity on that planet:

5900.91 N = Mass × Acceleration due to gravity on the other planet

Substituting the value of mass we calculated earlier:

5900.91 N = 75.63 kg × Acceleration due to gravity on the other planet

Now, we can solve for the acceleration due to gravity on the other planet:

Acceleration due to gravity on the other planet = 5900.91 N / 75.63 kg

Acceleration due to gravity on the other planet ≈ 77.98 m/s²

To know more about acceleration refer here

https://brainly.com/question/9415862#

#SPJ11

A copper wire was measured to be 50.0m long with an uncertainty of 1cm and had a thickness of 1.00mm measured with a micrometer screw gauge. The volume of copper used was [tex]3.93 \times 10^{-5}\; m^3[/tex] with an uncertainty of [tex]\pm 7.85 \times 10^{-9} m^3[/tex].

The volume of copper used can be calculated by multiplying the length, cross-sectional area, and density of copper. The length is given as 50.0 m with an uncertainty of [tex]\pm 0.01[/tex]m, and the thickness of the wire is given as 1.00 mm, which is equivalent to 0.001 m.

The cross-sectional area of the wire can be calculated using the formula for the area of a circle, which is πr², where r is the radius of the wire.

The radius of the wire can be calculated by dividing its thickness by 2, giving a value of 0.0005 m. Therefore, the cross-sectional area is [tex]\pi (0.0005)^2 = 7.85 \times 10^{-7} m^2[/tex]. The density of copper is 8.96 g/cm³, which is equivalent to [tex]8.96 \times 10^3 \;kg/m^3[/tex].

Using the formula V = L x A, where V is the volume of copper, L is the length of the wire, and A is the cross-sectional area, we get:

[tex]V = (50.0 \pm 0.01 m) \times (7.85 \times 10^{-7} m^2)[/tex]

[tex]V = 3.93 \times 10^{-5} m^3 \pm 7.85 \times 10^{-9} m^3[/tex]

To account for the uncertainties in the measurements, we used significant figures and error propagation rules. The uncertainty in the volume was calculated using the formula for the multiplication of quantities with uncertainties.

In summary, the volume of copper used was found to be [tex]3.93 \times 10^{-5}\; m^3[/tex] with an uncertainty of [tex]\pm 7.85 \times 10^{-9} m^3[/tex].

To know more about volume refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30347304#

#SPJ11

(a) Pb = 2π * N * T

(b) Pf = mf * CV

(c) Brake Thermal Efficiency (ηb) = (Pb / Pf) * 100%

To determine the brake power, fuel power, and brake thermal efficiency, we can use the following formulas:

(a) Brake Power (Pb):

Pb = 2π * N * T

Where N is the shaft speed in revolutions per minute (rpm) and T is the torque.

(b) Fuel Power (Pf):

Pf = mf * CV

Where mf is the fuel consumption rate in kilograms per second and CV is the calorific value of the fuel in joules per kilogram.

(c) Brake Thermal Efficiency (ηb):

ηb = (Pb / Pf) * 100%

Let's calculate these values using the given information:

(a) Brake Power:

Shaft Speed N = 2600 rev/min

Torque arm R = 16 cm = 0.16 m

The torque (T) can be calculated using the formula:

T = F * R

Brake Power (Pb) = 2π * N * T

(b) Fuel Power:

Fuel consumption mf = 2 g/s = 0.002 kg/s

Calorific Value (CV) = 42 MJ/kg = 42 × [tex]10^6[/tex] J/kg

Fuel Power (Pf) = mf * CV

(c) Brake Thermal Efficiency:

Brake Thermal Efficiency (ηb) = (Pb / Pf) * 100%

Let's substitute the given values into the equations and calculate the results.

To know more about brake power refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31456389#

#SPJ11

A small car weighing 2,205 pounds and traveling at 60 mph crashes into a steel pole and stops in 0.05 seconds. The force of the impact is calculated to be -53,600 N.

To calculate the force of a car that crashes into a steel pole, we need to use the formula F = m*a, where F is the force, m is the mass, and a is the acceleration.

To find the acceleration, we can use the formula[tex]a = (v_f - v_i) / t[/tex], where  [tex]v_f[/tex] is the final velocity, [tex]v_i[/tex] is the initial velocity, and t is the time it takes to stop.

First, we need to convert the weight of the car from pounds to mass in kilograms, which is 1000 kg. Then, we need to convert the speed from miles per hour to meters per second, which is 26.8 m/s.

Using the formula a = (0 - 26.8) / 0.05, we get an acceleration of -536 m/s². Finally, we can use the formula F = m*a to find the force, which is -53,600 N.

The negative sign indicates that the force is in the opposite direction of the car's motion, meaning the car experiences a deceleration force. The force is very high due to the short stopping time, which can cause severe damage to the car and its occupants.

In summary, the force of a car crashing into a steel pole and coming to a stop in 0.05 seconds can be calculated using the formula F = m*a. Converting the weight to mass and the speed to meters per second, we can find the acceleration and use it to calculate the force.

To know more about force refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/26115859#

#SPJ11

The third piece moves at an angle of 39.8° relative to the x-axis, which is in the northeast direction.

We can start the problem by using conservation of momentum. The momentum before the impact is zero since the plate is at rest, and the momentum after the impact is the sum of the momenta of the three pieces.

Since there are no horizontal forces during the crash, the total momentum is conserved in the x and y directions separately.

Let's call the velocity of the third piece v and assume it moves at an angle θ relative to the x-axis. Then we can write the following equations:

Initial momentum in x-direction = Final momentum in x-direction

0 = 0.32 kg * 2.00 m/s + 0.355 kg * 0 m/s + 0.1 kg * v cos(θ)

Initial momentum in y-direction = Final momentum in y-direction

0 = 0.32 kg * 0 m/s + 0.355 kg * 1.50 m/s + 0.1 kg * v sin(θ)

Simplifying these equations, we get:

0.64 = 0.1 v cos(θ)

0.535 = 0.1 v sin(θ)

We can divide the second equation by the first equation to get:

tan(θ) = 0.535/0.64 = 0.836

Taking the inverse tangent of both sides, we get:

θ = 39.8°

Therefore, the third piece moves at an angle of 39.8° relative to the x-axis, which is in the northeast direction.

To know more about momentum refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29220242#

#SPJ11

The smallest cross-sectional area of the copper cable that could be used is approximately 1.54 x 10^-6 square meters.

To calculate the smallest cross-sectional area of the copper cable that could be used, we need to apply Ohm's law and the formula for resistivity.

Ohm's law states that resistance (R) equals resistivity (ρ) multiplied by the length (L) of the conductor, divided by the cross-sectional area (A). In this case, we have:

R = ρ * L / A

We are given the maximum allowable resistance (R) per meter, which is 0.01 ohms/meter, and the resistivity of copper (ρ) as 1.54 x 10^-8 ohm-meter. Since we're considering resistance per meter, the length (L) is 1 meter. We need to find the smallest cross-sectional area (A) that satisfies these conditions.

0.01 ohm = (1.54 x 10^-8 ohm-meter) * 1 meter / A

To find A, we can rearrange the formula:

A = (1.54 x 10^-8 ohm-meter) * 1 meter / 0.01 ohm

A ≈ 1.54 x 10^-6 square meters

So, the smallest cross-sectional area of the copper cable that could be used is approximately 1.54 x 10^-6 square meters.

To learn more about copper, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/13677872

#SPJ11

It is equivalent to approximately 60.5 million days, or 165,850 years. The distance to Proxima Centauri is 4.3 light-years, which is equivalent to 4.068 x [tex]10^{13}[/tex] km.

To calculate how long it would take to travel that distance at a speed of 28,000 km/hr, we can divide the distance by the speed: 4.068 x [tex]10^{13}[/tex] km ÷ 28,000 km/hr = 1.452 x [tex]10^{9}[/tex] hours

That is equivalent to approximately 60.5 million days, or 165,850 years.

Therefore, it is currently not possible to travel to Proxima Centauri with the technology available to us. We would need to develop much faster spacecraft and propulsion systems to make interstellar travel feasible.

To know more about Proxima Centauri, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21107590#

#SPJ11

This standing wave corresponds to the third harmonic. The fundamental frequency of a guitar string is determined by the length of the string, which in this case is 61 cm.

When a standing wave is produced on the string, the nodes (points where the wave has zero displacement) and antinodes (points of maximum displacement) can be counted to determine the harmonic number. In this case, the number of antinodes is 3, which corresponds to the third harmonic.

The fundamental frequency of the string is determined by the equation f = 1/2L√T/m, where L is the length of the string, T is the tension, and m is the mass per unit length of the string. The third harmonic frequency is three times the fundamental frequency, which is calculated by multiplying the fundamental frequency by 3. Therefore, the third harmonic frequency of the guitar string is three times the fundamental frequency.

In addition, the wavelength of the third harmonic is one-third of the wavelength of the fundamental frequency. This is because the wavelength of a wave is inversely proportional to its frequency. The wavelength of the third harmonic is one-third of the wavelength of the fundamental frequency, and the distance between the antinodes is one-third of the wavelength. Therefore, the standing wave with three antinodes corresponds to the third harmonic.

Know more about displacement here

https://brainly.com/question/11934397#

#SPJ11

The TOTAL number of bright fringes that will show up on the screen is B) 5.

To answer this question, we need to use the following terms: wavelength, diffraction grating, lines/cm, and bright fringes.

Step 1: Convert the given data into meters
Wavelength (λ) = 514 nm = 514 * 10^(-9) m
Lines per cm (n) = 3952 lines/cm = 3952 * 10^2 lines/m (since 1 cm = 0.01 m)

Step 2: Calculate the grating spacing (d)
d = 1 / n = 1 / (3952 * 10^2) m

Step 3: Calculate the maximum order (m) using the grating equation
sin(90°) = m * λ / d

Since sin(90°) = 1,
m = d / λ

Step 4: Plug in the values and solve for m
m = (1 / (3952 * 10^2)) / (514 * 10^(-9))

m ≈ 2.09

Since m must be an integer, the maximum order is m = 2.

Step 5: Count the total number of bright fringes
For each order, there are 2 bright fringes (one on each side of the central spot), and one central spot (m = 0). Thus, the total number of bright fringes is:

Total bright fringes = 2 * (number of orders) + 1
Total bright fringes = 2 * (2) + 1
Total bright fringes = 5

So, the correct answer is B) 5.

For more about bright fringes:

https://brainly.com/question/31591286

#SPJ11

Answer: yes

Explanation: good luck

The weight of an object with a mass of 50 kg on Earth's surface is 490.5 N (Newtons).

To calculate the weight of an object on Earth's surface, we need to consider the mass of the object and the force of gravity (g). In this case, the mass is given as 50 kg, and the force of gravity is assumed to be 9.81 m/s².

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Start with the mass of the object (m) which is given as 50 kg.
2. Next, take the force of gravity (g) as 9.81 m/s² (as provided).
3. Now, we need to use the weight formula, which is:
Weight (W) = mass (m) × force of gravity (g)

4. Substitute the values of mass and force of gravity in the formula:
W = 50 kg × 9.81 m/s²

5. Perform the multiplication:
W = 490.5 N

So, the weight of the object sitting on Earth's surface with a mass of 50 kg is 490.5 Newtons.

Know more about force of gravity click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14874038

#SPJ11

Answer:

.92 T

Explanation:

This is just a plug-and-chug question.

Here is the formula: B = uni

u = vacuum permeability = 4pi * 10^-7 this is a given constant

n = turns per meter = 1040/ (4.4*10^-2)

i = current = 31 A also given by the problem

so B = .92 T

The unit of the magnetic field is Tesla ("T")

The frequency of the 5th harmonic of a 5 Hz fundamental is 25 Hz.

To find the frequency of the 5th harmonic (h₅) of a 5 Hz fundamental, you need to multiply the fundamental frequency (f₁) by the harmonic number (n). The formula is:

fₙ = n*f₁

where:

fₙ = frequency of the nth harmonic

f₁ = fundamental frequency

n = harmonic number

In this case, the fundamental frequency (f₁) is 5 Hz and the harmonic number (n) is 5. So, the frequency of the 5th harmonic (h₅) would be:

h₅ = 5 * 5

= 25 Hz

To know more about frequency, here

brainly.com/question/5102661

#SPJ4

The ultraviolet catastrophe is good evidence for the (B).wave nature of quanta is correct option.

The ultraviolet catastrophe was a problem in classical physics that arose when attempting to explain the spectral distribution of blackbody radiation. According to classical physics, the energy of radiation should increase without limit as the frequency of the radiation increases. However, experiments showed that this was not the case, and there was a maximum frequency beyond which the energy decreased.

This problem was resolved by Max Planck in 1900, who proposed that energy is quantized and can only exist in discrete packets or "quanta". This led to the development of quantum mechanics, which describes the behavior of matter and energy at the atomic and subatomic level.

The wave-particle duality is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics that describes the dual nature of particles, which can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior depending on the experimental setup. However, the ultraviolet catastrophe is specifically related to the wave nature of quanta, as it was the wave-like behavior of energy that led to the resolution of the problem.

To know more about wave nature

https://brainly.com/question/27077956

#SPJ4

The true velocity of the wind is approximately 43.10 km/h.

To find the true velocity of the wind when a motorcyclist is traveling due north at 50 km/h, and the wind appears to come from the northwest at 60 km/h, we can use vector addition.

Step 1: Break the wind's apparent velocity into its north and west components. Since the wind is coming from the northwest, the north and west components will be equal.

Using the Pythagorean theorem (a² + b² = c²) to find the components:

North component:

a = 60 * cos(45°)

  = 60 * 0.707

   = 42.43 km/h

West component:

b = 60 * sin(45°)

  = 60 * 0.707

  = 42.43 km/h

Step 2: Subtract the motorcyclist's northward velocity from the north component of the wind's apparent velocity:

True north component of the wind:

42.43 - 50 = -7.57 km/h (southward)

Step 3: Combine the true north and west components of the wind's velocity using the Pythagorean theorem:

True wind velocity = √((-7.57)² + (42.43)²)

                               = √(57.36 + 1800.06)

                                = √1857.42

                                ≈ 43.10 km/h

The true velocity of the wind is approximately 43.10 km/h.

To know more about velocity refer here

brainly.com/question/17127206#

#SPJ11

The marble-jar experiment is a classic demonstration of Newton's Law of Inertia. The experiment consists of a jar filled with marbles and a card covering the jar's opening.

When the jar is inverted quickly, the card falls, and the marbles remain in place.

According to Newton's Law of Inertia, an object at rest will remain at rest, and an object in motion will continue to move in a straight line at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.

In this experiment, the marbles' inertia keeps them in place when the jar is inverted, while the card falls due to the external force of gravity.

This experiment provides a simple and tangible way to understand Newton's Law of Inertia.

To know more about Law of Inertia, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1830739#

#SPJ11

Horticulture is a field that greatly benefits from specialized technology. This is because the uniformity of crops in horticulture allows for machines that are tightly focused on specific tasks.

These machines are designed to perform specialized functions such as planting, pruning, and harvesting. This specialized equipment ensures that the crops are tended to with precision and care, which results in higher yields and better quality produce.

In contrast, unspecialized machines that can be adapted for multiple tasks may not perform as well in horticulture because they lack the precision and efficiency required for these specialized tasks.

So, in horticulture, specialized technology works well because it allows for precise and efficient handling of crops, which ultimately leads to better yields and higher-quality produce.

To learn more about horticulture, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/28991945

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the force that a magnetic field exerts on a charged particle is given by the equation:

F = qvB sin(theta)

where q is the charge of the particle, v is its velocity, B is the magnetic field strength, and theta is the angle between the velocity vector and the magnetic field vector.

In this case, the proton has a positive charge of +1.6 x 10^-19 C, and it is moving eastward with a velocity of 5.0 km/s. The magnetic field is pointing northward with a strength of 0.20 T.

The angle between the velocity vector and the magnetic field vector is 90 degrees, since the velocity is eastward and the magnetic field is northward.

Plugging these values into the equation, we get:

F = (1.6 x 10^-19 C)(5.0 x 10^3 m/s)(0.20 T) sin(90)

F = 1.6 x 10^-19 N

So the magnitude of the force that the magnetic field exerts on the proton is 1.6 x 10^-19 N.

The direction of the force can be determined using the right-hand rule. If you point your right thumb in the direction of the proton's velocity (eastward), and your fingers in the direction of the magnetic field (northward), then the direction of the force vector is perpendicular to both, pointing downward. Therefore, the direction of the force on the proton is southward.