The sum of twice a nuber,n, and 14 is 30.

In general, it is best to determine the equation of the line of best fit exactly rather than relying on estimation by inspection. This is because an exact equation allows for more precise predictions and calculations.

Estimation by inspection can be useful in situations where the data is relatively simple and a rough estimate is sufficient. However, in more complex datasets, it is important to use statistical methods to determine the line of best fit accurately.

For example, in some cases, it may be more important to prioritize the accuracy of the slope of the line over the accuracy of the intercept. In such cases, certain methods, such as minimizing the sum of the squares of the vertical deviations, may be more appropriate than others.

To learn more about “estimation” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/28416295

#SPJ11

Nosaira's work is incorrect. Her mistake is in the step where she simplifies the expression 2x+1 on the left side of the equation by multiplying it with 3. She distributed the 3 only to the 2x term, but forgot to distribute it to the 1 term as well.

So, the correct expression on the left side should be 6x+3 instead of 6x+1. This mistake leads to the wrong equation 6x+3=2x^2-1, and when she tries to solve for x, she ends up with the equation 4x=0, which only has one solution, x=0.

Therefore, Nosaira's interpretation of the answer as having no solution is incorrect. The original equation actually does have a solution, which is x=1/2. If we correct the mistake in her work, we can see that the equation becomes [tex]6x+3=2x^2-1[/tex], which simplifies to [tex]2x^2-6x-4=0[/tex]. We can then factor out 2 to get [tex]x^2-3x-2=0[/tex], which can be factored further into (x-2)(x+1)=0. Therefore, the solutions are x=2 and x=-1, but we need to reject the negative solution as it does not satisfy the original equation.

In conclusion, Nosaira made a mistake in distributing the coefficient 3, which led to an incorrect equation and an incorrect interpretation of the answer. It is important to be careful and check our work, especially when dealing with algebraic expressions and equations.

To know more about expression, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/13733773#

#SPJ11

The value of the addition of the functions:

F(x) + g(x) = (8x² + 34x - 56)/(x²-3x-40).

To add the two rational functions F(x) and g(x), we first need to find a common denominator. In this case, the common denominator is (x+5)(x-8), since both denominators can be factored in this way.

F(x) needs to be multiplied by (x-8) on the top and bottom to get a common denominator of (x+5)(x-8), and g(x) needs to be multiplied by (x+5) on the top and bottom to get the same common denominator.

So, we have:

F(x) = (x+7)/(x+5) * (x-8)/(x-8) = (x² - x - 56)/(x² - 3x - 40)

g(x) = 7x/(x²-3x-40) * (x+5)/(x+5) = 7x(x+5)/(x+5)(x-8) = 7x(x+5)/(x²-3x-40)

Now that both functions have the same denominator, we can add them together:

F(x) + g(x) = (x² - x - 56)/(x² - 3x - 40) + 7x(x+5)/(x²-3x-40)

To simplify this expression, we need to combine the two fractions over the common denominator:

F(x) + g(x) = (x² - x - 56 + 7x² + 35x)/(x²-3x-40)

Combining like terms in the numerator:

F(x) + g(x) = (8x² + 34x - 56)/(x²-3x-40)

So, F(x) + g(x) = (8x² + 34x - 56)/(x²-3x-40).

To solve a rational function, we generally follow these steps:

In the case of F(x) and g(x), we already simplified the sum of the functions. We can see that the denominator factors as (x+5)(x-8), which means that the function is undefined at x = -5 and x = 8. These are vertical asymptotes.

To find any horizontal asymptotes, we can use the fact that the degree of the numerator is greater than or equal to the degree of the denominator. This means that there is no horizontal asymptote; instead, the function approaches infinity as x approaches infinity or negative infinity.

Finally, we can graph the function using this information and any other relevant points, such as intercepts.

To know more about function, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594#

#SPJ11

The probability of choosing randomly with replacement an H or P in either selection is derived to be equal to 0.16 which makes the last option correct.

The probability of an event occurring is the fraction of the number of required outcome divided by the total number of possible outcomes.

The total possible outcome = 5

the event of selecting H = 1

probability of selecting H= 1/5

the event of selecting P = 2

probability of selecting H= 2/5

probability of choosing an H or P in either selection = 1/5 × 2/5 + 2/5 × 1/5

probability of choosing an H or P in either selection = 4/25

probability of choosing an H or P in either selection = 0.16

Therefore, the probability of choosing randomly with replacement an H or P in either selection is derived to be equal to 0.16

Read more about probability here:https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. Lines A and D are perpendicular.

DAnswer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The rewritten expression of 12 using the distributive property is 3(2 + 2)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

12 distributive property

This means that

12

Express as 6 + 6

So, we have

12 = 6 + 6

Factor out 3 from the equation

So, we have

12 = 3(2 + 2)

The above equation has been rewritten using the distributive property.

Hence, the rewritten expression using the distributive property is 3(2 + 2)

Read more about distributive property at

brainly.com/question/2807928

#SPJ1

The answer that gives the correct transformation of P(x) to get to I(x) is option D) I(x) = 2P(x).

This means that the function I(x) is obtained by multiplying the function P(x) by 2.

To understand why this is the correct transformation, let's consider an example:

Suppose P(x) represents the number of items produced by a factory in x hours. If we want to find the number of items produced by the factory in 2x hours, we can use the transformation I(x) = 2P(x). This is because the rate of production is constant, so in twice the time, the factory will produce twice the number of items. Therefore, multiplying the function P(x) by 2 gives us the function I(x) that represents the number of items produced by the factory in 2x hours.

Option A) I(x) = P(1/2x) means that we are compressing the function P(x) horizontally, which would result in a faster rate of change. This transformation does not make sense in the context of the problem and is not the correct transformation.

Option B) I(x) = P(2x) means that we are stretching the function P(x) horizontally, which would result in a slower rate of change. This transformation also does not make sense in the context of the problem and is not the correct transformation.

Option C) I(x) = 1/2P(x) means that we are reducing the function P(x) by half, which would result in a slower rate of change. This transformation does not match the problem statement and is not the correct transformation.

To learn more about  transformation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29641135

#SPJ11

Answer: x=29

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the value of x, we can set the two angles equal to each other and solve for x, which gives x = 19.

We can use the fact that alternate interior angles are congruent when a transversal intersects parallel lines. In this case, line ab and cd are parallel and 6 and 5 are alternate interior angles. So we can set up an equation:

4x - 31 = 95

Solving for x:

4x = 126

x = 31.5

So the value of x is not one of the answer choices given. However, if we round x to the nearest integer, we get x = 32, which is closest to answer choice (d) x = 29. Therefore, the closest answer choice is (d) x = 29.

Learn more about interior angles

brainly.com/question/10638383

#SPJ11

One would least expect to find fossils in the surface bedrock in the Adirondack Mountains region of New York State.

This region is known for having some of the oldest rocks in North America, dating back over a billion years. These rocks were formed through volcanic activity and mountain-building processes that occurred long before the evolution of complex life forms.

As a result, the rocks in the Adirondack Mountains are generally not rich in fossils, especially those of plants and animals that evolved much later in Earth's history.

In contrast, other regions of New York State, such as the Hudson Valley and the Finger Lakes region, have rocks that are more conducive to fossil preservation. These regions were covered by shallow seas at various times in the past, allowing for the accumulation of sediment and the preservation of fossils of marine organisms.

To learn more about fossil, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31419516

#SPJ11

The basal metabolic rate for a 180-kilogram lion is approximately 766.4 Calories per day.

The formula predicts that an 80-kilogram human would have a basal metabolic rate of approximately 1,313.9 Calories per day.

The basal metabolic rate is the amount of energy that an organism needs to carry out its basic physiological functions, such as breathing and circulating blood. In this case, Kielber's law is expressed as:

R = 73 [tex]\sqrt[4]{M^3}[/tex]

Let's use this function to find the basal metabolic rate for a 180-kilogram lion. To do this, we simply substitute M = 180 into the equation and solve for R:

R = 73 [tex]\sqrt[4]{180^3}[/tex]

R = 73 [tex]\sqrt[4]{5832}[/tex]

R ≈ 766.4

Now, let's find the formula's prediction for an 80-kilogram human. Again, we simply substitute M = 80 into the equation and solve for R:

R = 73[tex]\sqrt[4]{80^3}[/tex]

R = 73[tex]\sqrt[4]{512}[/tex]

R ≈ 1,313.9

To know more about function here

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

The function R = 73 [tex]\sqrt[4]{M^3}[/tex], known as Kielber's law, relates the basal metabolic rate R In Calories per day burned and the body mass M of a mammal In kilograms.

Find the basal metabolic rate for a 180-kilogram lion. Then find the formula's prediction for an 80-kilogram human. If necessary round down to the nearest 50 Calories.

Answer:

[tex]f(x)=x^3+11x^2+43x+65[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

If a polynomial function has a complex zero, then the conjugate of that complex zero is also a zero of the polynomial.

So, if (-3 - 2i) is a zero of the polynomial, then its conjugate (-3 + 2i) is also a zero of the polynomial.

Therefore, the three zeros of the polynomial function are:

The zero of a polynomial f(x) is the x-value when f(x) = 0.

According to the factor theorem, if f(a) = 0 then (x - a) is a factor of the polynomial f(x).

Therefore, the polynomial function in factored form is:

[tex]\begin{aligned}f(x) &= (x - (-5))(x-(-3-2i))(x-(-3+2i))\\&= (x +5)(x+3+2i)(x+3-2i)\end{aligned}[/tex]

Expand the brackets to write the polynomial in standard form.

[tex]\begin{aligned}f(x) &=(x +5)(x+3+2i)(x+3-2i)\\&=(x+5)(x^2+3x-2xi+3x+9-6i+2ix+6i-4i^2)\\&=(x+5)(x^2+6x+9-4i^2)\\&=(x+5)(x^2+6x+9-4(-1))\\&=(x+5)(x^2+6x+9+4)\\&=(x+5)(x^2+6x+13)\\&=x^3+6x^2+13x+5x^2+30x+65\\&=x^3+11x^2+43x+65\end{aligned}[/tex]

Therefore, the polynomial function of least degree with integral coefficients that has the given zeros -5 and (-3 - 2i) is:

[tex]f(x)=x^3+11x^2+43x+65[/tex]

f(x)=x3+11x²+43x+65

The graph of the function will touch the x-axis at x = -5, but not cross it, and the behavior of the graph near x = -5 will be determined by the degree of the zero (which is 3 in this case).

The polynomial function that represents the volume of a sphere with radius x+5 is given by:

[tex]V(x) = (4/3)\pi (x+5)^3[/tex]

To find the multiplicity of the zero, we need to factor out the (x+5) term from the polynomial:

V(x) = (4/3)π(x+5)(x+5)(x+5)

We can see that the zero is x = -5, and it has a multiplicity of 3, since there are three factors of (x+5) in the polynomial.

This means that the graph of the function will touch the x-axis at x = -5, but not cross it, and the behavior of the graph near x = -5 will be determined by the degree of the zero (which is 3 in this case).

To know more about graph refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ11

The potential function f(x, y, z) evaluated at the endpoints of C gives the same result:

f(1, 1, 1) - f(0, 0, 0) = (1 + 5 + 5 + 1/2 + 1/2) - 0 = 12

This confirms that f is indeed the potential function for F.

To confirm that F is conservative, we need to check if its curl is zero. The curl of F is given by:

Substituting F(x, y, z) = (1z + 5y) i + (1z + 5x)j + (1y + 1x)k into the above equation, we get:

curl(F) = 0i + 0j + 0k

The potential function f for F, we need to integrate F along any path from (0,0,0) to (1,1,1). Let C be the path given by the line segment connecting (0,0,0) and (1,1,1).

The parametric equations of C are:

where 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

We need to evaluate the line integral ∫CF.dr, where r(t) = ti + tj + tk is the position vector of C at time t. The potential function f is defined as the line integral of F from (0,0,0) to (x,y,z), so we need to find an antiderivative of F to evaluate this integral.

The antiderivative of F is:

where C is a constant of integration. We want f to have a constant term of 0, so we choose C = 0.

Now we can evaluate the line integral ∫CF.dr by substituting the parametric equations of C into F and taking the dot product with the differential of r(t):

Integrating from t=0 to t=1, we get:

Learn more about F is conservative

brainly.com/question/24314070

#SPJ11

The initial value of the account is: 6320

Compound interest is defined as the interest you earn on interest. This can be illustrated by using basic math: if you have $100 and it earns 10% interest each year, you'll have $110 at the end of the first year.

The general formula to find compound interest is:

A = P(1 + r/n)^t

where:

A is final amount

P is initial principal balance

r is interest rate

n is number of times interest applied per time period

t is number of time periods elapsed

We are given the equation as:

f(t) = 6320(1.054)^(t)

Thus, the initial value is 6320

Read more about compound interest at: https://brainly.com/question/24274034

#SPJ1

It's "D"

It's self explanatory but y gets 1/2 of whatever x is and adds 1. So if x = 2, then it'll get half of two (which is one) and add one to it, getting two.

The equation of the tangent plane to the surface with equation - in (9) +-3 at the point (2,1,9),  first need to find the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x, y, and z. However, the surface equation provided seems to be incorrect or incomplete. Please provide the correct surface equation in the form f(x, y, z) = constant.

Let's call the function f(x, y, z) = - in (9) +-3.
∂f/∂x = 0  (since there is no x term in the function)
∂f/∂y = 0  (since there is no y term in the function)
∂f/∂z = -3/((z-9)^2)
Now we can use the formula for the equation of the tangent plane at a point (a,b,c) on a surface z=f(x,y):
z - f(a,b) = (∂f/∂x)(a,b)(x-a) + (∂f/∂y)(a,b)(y-b)
+ (∂f/∂z)(a,b)(z-c)
Plugging in the values we have, we get:
z - (- in (9) +-3)|_(2,1) = 0(x-2) + 0(y-1) - (3/((z-9)^2))|_(2,1,9)(z-9)
Simplifying:
z + in (9) - 3 = -3(z-9)
4z = 30
z = 7.5
So the equation of the tangent plane is:
z - (- in (9) +-3)|_(2,1) = (-3/((z-9)^2))|_(2,1,9)(z-9)
z - in (9) - 3 = -3(7.5-9)
z - in (9) - 3 = 4.5
z = 12.5
Therefore, the equation of the tangent plane to the surface with equation - in (9) +-3 at the point (2,1,9) is:

z - in (9) - 3 = -3/((z-9)^2)(z-9)
z - in (9) - 3 = -3(z-9)/(z-9)^2
z - in (9) - 3 = -3/(z-9)
z = 3/(z-9) + in (9) + 3
or
3x + 3y - 4z = -27 + in (9)
To find the equation of the tangent plane to the surface with equation ln(9) +- 3 at the point (x, y, z) = (2, 1, 9), follow these steps:
1. Determine the gradient vector of the given surface at the point (2, 1, 9).
2. Use the gradient vector as the normal vector of the tangent plane.
3. Write the equation of the tangent plane using the normal vector and the given point.
However, the surface equation provided seems to be incorrect or incomplete. Please provide the correct surface equation in the form f(x, y, z) = constant, so that I can help you find the equation of the tangent plane.

Visit here to learn more about tangent plane:

brainly.com/question/30260323

#SPJ11

The rounding method used, the estimated speed of the space shuttle after it has slowed down is 10,200 miles per hour.

To estimate the speed of the space shuttle after it has slowed down, we round each number to the nearest hundred. The speed before the decrease is rounded to 17,600 miles per hour, and the decrease in speed is rounded to 7,400 miles per hour.

Next, we subtract the rounded decrease in speed from the rounded speed before. So, 17,600 - 7,400 = 10,200 miles per hour. This result represents the estimated speed of the space shuttle after it has slowed down.

Rounding to the nearest hundred is a way to approximate the values and make calculations simpler. However, it is important to note that rounding introduces some degree of error, and the actual speed after the decrease may differ slightly from the estimated value.

To know more about speed , refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/28224010#

#SPJ11

The length of the intercepted arc on the unit circle is equal to the radius of the circle times the angle in radians. In this case, since the unit circle has a radius of 1, the length of the intercepted arc is simply equal to the angle in radians.

So, the length of the intercepted arc for an angle of 1.5 radians is 1.5 units (since the angle is given in radians, not degrees).

To Know more about   length of the intercepted arc refer here

https://brainly.com/question/27602835#

#SPJ11

The rank of the coefficient matrix A is 5.

Since the system AX = B is consistent and has 12 equations and 8 variables, the rank of the coefficient matrix A must be less than or equal to 8 (the number of variables).

If the solution of the system contains 3 free variables, it means that the dimension of the null-space of A is 3. By the rank-nullity theorem,

we know that the dimension of the null-space of A plus the rank of A is equal to the number of columns of A (which is 8 in this case).

Therefore, we have:

rank(A) + dim(null(A)) = 8

rank(A) + 3 = 8

rank(A) = 5

So, the rank of the coefficient matrix A is 5.

Learn more about matrix

brainly.com/question/9967572

#SPJ11

The two possible values of x are -29 and 69.

To find two possible values for x, we need to use the fact that the range of

the numbers is 63.

The range is defined as the difference between the largest and smallest

numbers in the set.

First, we can find the largest and smallest numbers in the set:

Smallest number = 6

Largest number = 34

Next, we can set up two equations to represent the range of the numbers,

using the two possible scenarios for x:

Scenario 1:

If x is the smallest number in the set, then the range is equal to [tex]34 - x.[/tex]

Scenario 2: If x is the largest number in the set, then the range is equal to

[tex]x - 6[/tex].

We can then set up two equations and solve for x in each scenario:

Scenario 1:

[tex]34 - x = 63x = 34 - 63x = -29[/tex]

Scenario 2:

[tex]x - 6 = 63x = 63 + 6x = 69[/tex]

To know more about range refer here https://brainly.com/question/28135761# #SPJ11

Answer:

-√3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

sin(x) is equal to 1/2 when x=7π/6 or 11π/6

cos(7π/6) = -√3/2

cos(11π/6) = √3/2

In the question, it says that cos(x) is <0, which means that it has to be negative

So, the answer is -√3/2

Answer:  C

Step-by-step explanation:

Think of a unit circle

sin x = -1/2 happens at 7[tex]\pi[/tex]/6 and 11[tex]\pi[/tex]/6, 3rd and 4th quadrant

Out of those 2 quadrants cos x is negative in the 3rd quadrant

So cos x= -√3/2

To solve the problem, we need to find out how much longer it would take for Samir's money to double compared to Penelope's money, given that Penelope invested $89,000 in an account with a continuous interest rate of 6%, while Samir invested $89,000 in an account with a monthly compounded interest rate of 6⅜%.

For Penelope's investment, we can use the formula for continuous compounding, which is A = Pe^(rt), where A is the amount of money after t years, P is the initial investment, r is the interest rate as a decimal, and e is the natural logarithm base. We know that Penelope invested $89,000 and we want to find t such that A = 2P = $178,000. Thus, we have:

$178,000 = $89,000e^(0.06t)

Dividing both sides by $89,000 and taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(2) = 0.06t

Solving for t, we get:

t = ln(2)/0.06 ≈ 11.55 years

For Samir's investment, we can use the formula for monthly compounded interest, which is A = P(1 + r/12)^(12t), where A, P, r are the same as before, and t is the time in years divided by 12. Similarly, we know that Samir invested $89,000 and we want to find t such that A = 2P = $178,000. Thus, we have:

$178,000 = $89,000(1 + 0.0638/12)^(12t)

Dividing both sides by $89,000 and taking the logarithm (base 1 + r/12) of both sides, we get:

log(2)/log(1 + 0.0638/12) = 12t

Solving for t, we get:

t ≈ 11.80/12 = 0.98 years

To find the difference in time it takes for Samir's money to double compared to Penelope's, we subtract the time it takes for Penelope's money to double from the time it takes for Samir's money to double:

0.98 - 11.55 ≈ -10.57

However, this answer doesn't make sense in the context of the problem, since it's negative. After reviewing our solution, we realized that we made a mistake in the calculation of t for Penelope's investment. We need to find the time it takes for Penelope's investment to double with annual compounding, not continuous compounding. The formula for this is t = (ln(2))/(ln(1 + r)), where r is the annual interest rate as a decimal.

Plugging in the numbers, we get:

t = (ln(2))/(ln(1 + 0.06)) ≈ 11.55 years

This is the same as the time we got for Samir's investment, so the difference in time it takes for their money to double is:

0.98 - 11.55 ≈ -10.57

Again, this answer doesn't make sense in the context of the problem, since it's negative. Therefore, we need to revise our solution and approach the problem differently.

Answer:

Each car cost $0.81, you would need to do 0.81 times 25 and you would get $20.25

Step-by-step explanation:

The vertex and x-intercepts of -6x^2-50x+3085. 25 are approximately -42.60 and 30.97.

To find the vertex and x-intercepts of the quadratic function -6x^2-50x+3085.25, we first need to express it in standard form -6x^2-50x+3085.25 = -6(x^2+8.33x-514.21)

So the x-intercepts are approximately -42.60 and 30.97.

We can complete the square to find the vertex of the parabola:

-6(x^2+8.33x-514.21) = -6[(x+4.165)^2-575.641]

-6(x^2+8.33x-514.21) = -6(x+4.165)^2+3453.844

So the vertex is at (-4.165, 575.844).

To find the x-intercepts, we can set y = 0 and solve for x:

-6x^2-50x+3085.25 = 0

Dividing both sides by -2.25 to simplify, we get:

2.6667x^2+22.2222x-1372.2222 = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

x = (-22.2222 ± sqrt(22.2222^2-4(2.6667)(-1372.2222))) / (2(2.6667))

x = (-22.2222 ± sqrt(37511.1116)) / 5.3334

x = (-22.2222 ± 193.7262) / 5.3334

So the x-intercepts are approximately -42.60 and 30.97.

To learn more about “vertex” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/29476657

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given an angle opposite of the side length x and the hypotenuse 10.

Use SOHCAHTOA, use Sin

[tex] \sin( \alpha ) = \frac{o}{h} [/tex]

We the angle is 20

and the hypotenuse is 10 and the opposite is x.

[tex] \sin(20) = \frac{x}{10} [/tex]

[tex]10 \sin(20) = x[/tex]

And we get

[tex]x = 3.42[/tex]

After calculating the distance, Ranjan has driven 358.55 miles so far.

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula:

distance = fuel efficiency x fuel consumed

Let's start by calculating the total fuel consumed. At the first stop, Ranjan adds 6.7 gallons of gas, which means he consumed 6.7 gallons of gas since his tank was full at the beginning of the trip. At the second stop, he adds 3.4 gallons of gas, which means he consumed 3.4 gallons of gas between the first and second stops. Therefore, the total fuel consumed is:

6.7 + 3.4 = 10.1 gallons

Now we can calculate the distance driven using the fuel efficiency of 35.5 miles per gallon:

distance = 35.5 miles/gallon x 10.1 gallons = 358.55 miles

Therefore, Ranjan has driven 358.55 miles so far.

To know more about distance, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15172156#

#SPJ11

There were 59.2 million enterprise IM accounts in 2006 and the expected number of enterprise IM accounts in 2009 was 119.89 million.

(a) To find the number of enterprise IM accounts in 2006, we need to evaluate

N(t) at t = 0: N(0) = 2.97(0)^2 + 11.32(0) + 59.2

N(0) = 0 + 0 + 59.2

N(0) = 59.2 million

So, there were 59.2 million enterprise IM accounts in 2006.

(b) To find the expected number of enterprise IM accounts in 2009, we need to evaluate

N(t) at t = 3 (since 2009 corresponds to t = 3): N(3) = 2.97(3)^2 + 11.32(3) + 59.2

N(3) = 2.97(9) + 33.96 + 59.2

N(3) = 26.73 + 33.96 + 59.2

N(3) = 119.89 million

So, the expected number of enterprise IM accounts in 2009 was 119.89 million.

Learn more about calculas,

https://brainly.com/question/29200987

#SPJ11

Using quadratic formula, the value of x in the quadratic equation are 1.47 and -0.85

To find the value of x, we can either use quadratic formula or factorization method.

8x² - 2 - 5x = 8

Let's rewrite the equation properly

8x² - 5x - 2 - 8 = 0

8x² - 5x - 10 = 0

a = 8, b = -5, c = -10

Using quadratic formula;

-b ±[√b² - 4ac / 2a]

-(-5) ±[√(-5)² - 4(8)(-10) / 2(8)]

x = 5+ √345 / 16 or x = 5 - √345 / 16

x = 1.47 or x = -0.85

Learn more on quadratic equations here;

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

The correct answer for the equation is  [tex]h = -2cos(\pi t) + 5[/tex] . The correct option is (1)

Given:

[tex]h= -2sin(\pi\tfrac{t}{2} )[/tex]

Examine the answer choices:

[tex]h = -2cos(\pi t) + 5[/tex]

Amplitude: |-2| = 2 (same as the given equation)

Frequency: π (same as the given equation)

Phase Shift: None (different from the given equation)

[tex]h = -2cos(\pi (t/2)) + 5[/tex]

Amplitude: |-2| = 2 (same as the given equation)

Frequency: π/2 (different from the given equation)

Phase Shift: None (different from the given equation)

[tex]h = 2cos(\pi t) + 5[/tex]

Amplitude: |2| = 2 (different from the given equation)

Frequency: π (same as the given equation)

Phase Shift: None (different from the given equation)

[tex]h = 2cos(\pi(t/2)) + 5[/tex]

Amplitude: |2| = 2 (different from the given equation)

Frequency: π/2 (different from the given equation)

Phase Shift: None (different from the given equation)

The correct equation is [tex]h = -2cos(\pi t) + 5[/tex]  .The correct option is (1).

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/27767092

#SPJ12