Answer:
Sentorial and imperial
Many Mexicans who lived on land that was part of the Mexican Cession
A) had to give up their land and relocate to Mexico.
B) became US citizens and added to a area’s population.
C) Were not allowed to property in the United States.
D) Fought the Americans even though the war was over.
Many Mexicans who lived on land that was part of the Mexican Cession became US citizens and added to a area’s population. became US citizens and added to a area’s population. Option b
What led to the Mexican Cession?The Mexican Cession is the region in the United States that originally controlled by Mexico disputed boundary between the United States and Texas the Nueces Strip that led to Mexican American War.
Due to the facts that Mexico did not recognize Texas as a legal American territory and Texas was answerable to the United States that provoke Mexican officials and citizens. instead of trying to fine away to solve this problem, President Polk deliberately keep at it to aggravate Mexico that led a war
Mexican American War ended with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which gave Mexican citizens an option to choose between one year to U.S. or Mexican citizenship
Learn more about Mexican Cession on brainly.com/question/259838
#SPJ1
What general features, according to the author, are associated with being or becoming "modern"? What factors help account for why the Gebusi so willingly accepted modernizing influences between 1982 and 1998? How much of this acceptance was based in culture or cultural belief rather than possible economic improvement?
The Gebusi people's acceptance of modernizing influences in the 1980s and 1990s was based on a combination of economic, cultural, and social factors, with the promise of economic improvement playing a significant role.
In his book "The Gebusi: Lives Transformed in a Rainforest World," Bruce Knauft explores the process of modernization and its impact on the Gebusi people, a small-scale society living in Papua New Guinea. According to the author, modernization is associated with a number of general features, including industrialization, urbanization, technological innovation, rationalization, and secularization. These features are often accompanied by changes in social organization, values, beliefs, and practices.
The Gebusi people were initially reluctant to accept modernizing influences, but they became more willing to do so in the 1980s and 1990s. Knauft identifies several factors that help account for this shift, including increased exposure to outside influences, the desire for new forms of social organization, the promise of economic improvement, and the appeal of new technologies and material goods.
However, the Gebusi's acceptance of modernizing influences was not solely based on economic factors. The Gebusi also valued the new forms of social organization, values, beliefs, and practices that came with modernization. They were attracted to the sense of progress and advancement that these changes represented, as well as the new technologies and material goods that were becoming available.
Overall, the Gebusi's acceptance of modernizing influences reflects a complex interplay between economic, cultural, and social factors that transformed their lives in significant ways.
To learn more about the Gebusi, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/10438779
#SPJ11
An observer of World War II once said, "In a strange twist of irony, the Axis Power simply did to Europeans what Europeans have done to people of color. " Do you agree with this statement? Please consider both the rise of the Axis powers, especially Germany and Japan, and the rise of imperialism discussed earlier in class. In what ways were they similar? In what ways were they different?
The statement that "In a strange twist of irony, the Axis Power simply did to Europeans what Europeans have done to people of color" can be seen as accurate to a certain extent. The rise of imperialism discussed earlier in class and the Axis powers' aggression shared certain similarities in terms of their goals and methods.
Both the Axis powers and imperialist Europeans sought to expand their territories and exert control over other nations. They used military force and economic dominance to achieve their goals, often resulting in the exploitation of other countries and peoples. Additionally, both the Axis powers and European imperialists held beliefs in the superiority of their respective cultures and races.
However, there are also significant differences between the two. The rise of the Axis powers, particularly Germany and Japan, was driven by fascist ideologies that sought to establish authoritarian regimes and enforce conformity. In contrast, European imperialism was driven by economic and political goals and often resulted in the establishment of colonial governments.
Furthermore, the Axis powers' aggression during World War II resulted in a devastating war that caused significant human suffering and loss of life. In contrast, the impact of European imperialism varied from region to region and did not involve a global conflict on the same scale.
In conclusion, while there are similarities between the rise of imperialism and the aggression of the Axis powers, there are also significant differences. Both involved the use of military force and the belief in cultural and racial superiority, but the Axis powers' fascist ideologies and the scale of World War II set them apart from European imperialism.
To learn more about Axis Power refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3093257
#SPJ11
Read the quote from the Quran.
Based on what you know about
Muhammad's teachings, explain
what man "did not know."
According to the Quran, Muhammad was a man of the highest moral caliber, and God created him to serve as a good example or a "goodly model" for Muslims to imitate (Quran 68:4, and 33:21).
How does the Quran describe men?Islam's holy scripture, the Quran, declares that women and men are spiritually equal. "Those who do good, whether male or female, and have faith will enter Paradise and will never suffer wrong, even as much as the speck on a date stone," the Quran states.
What doctrines did the Prophet Muhammad espouse?He urged people to act with charity, justice, patriotism, and religion and condemned persecution of others as well as of animals and the environment. His many quotes include: Everyone begins the day as a vendor of his soul, either liberating it or bringing about its destruction.
To Know more about persecution
https://brainly.com/question/4119348
#SPJ9
Why did woman in new mexico lead liberty bond drives during world war 1
A. To encourage the army to build Camp Cody
B. To bring an end to the mexican expedition
C. To show their support for the war effort
D. To pay for the cost of occupation of veracruz
The woman in new mexico lead liberty bond drives during world war 1 C. To show their support for the war effort.
During The Second Great War, ladies across the US assumed a functioning part in supporting the conflict exertion. One way they did this was by driving Freedom Security drives, which were raising support crusades pointed toward empowering residents to purchase bonds to assist with funding the conflict. Ladies in New Mexico, similar to ladies in different states, partook in these drives to show their help for the conflict and to assist with raising assets for the conflict exertion. The cash raised through the offer of Freedom Securities was utilized to pay for things like weapons, ammo, and different supplies required by the military.
To learn more about liberty bond, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/2101129
#SPJ4
1. What role did protesting have on the success of the Civil Rights movement?
A. By protesting the inequalities within the military, public pressure led to the creation of more
opportunities for African-Americans in the Armed Services.
B. Protesting led to an increase in political activism which resulted in a rise of minorities being
elected to federal offices in order to change the status quo.
C. By protesting, the discrimination African Americans experienced was shared with a wider
audience which increased support for securing equal rights.
D. Protesting challenged traditional beliefs about equality and created a platform for minorities to
lobby Congress to increase funding for housing for the poor.
By protesting, the discrimination African Americans experienced was shared with a wider audience which increased support for securing equal rights and the role protesting have in the success of the Civil Rights movement. The correct is option C.
The success of the Civil Rights movement was greatly influenced by protesting. African Americans and others who supported them raised attention to the injustice and inequality they experienced by organizing protests, sit-ins, and other peaceful forms of expression.
These demonstrations aided in raising public knowledge of and sympathy for the Civil Rights movement, which boosted support for governmental and societal changes aimed at ensuring equal rights for African Americans. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, among other important reforms, were a result of protesting, which was a crucial factor in their passage.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about the Civil Rights movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/31897973
#SPJ1
Borked!
have you ever been "borked"? unless you're a political nominee whose
nomination got cut short because people attacked your reputation with strong
criticism, probably not. but here's someone who has been: robert bork. he got
"borked" so bad that his own name is where the word came from. of course,
not everyone agrees that a public attack was bork's only problem.
1 look at the entry for robert bork in the nominee table.
what ultimately happened to
bork's nomination?
president ronald reagan
(left) with robert bork
2 go online and use the date of the confirmation vote to find a news article from that time period about either the
confirmation vote or the senate judiciary committee's vote. read the article
date: website
title
if someone asked why senators
were concerned about bork,
i what would you say?
based on what you learned
earlier in this lesson, how would
you describe bork's judicial
philosophy? if you can't tell from
the artide you aready found find
another source
many senators did support
bork's nomination. list some
reasons why. find another source
if necessary
Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court was rejected by the Senate in 1987 due to concerns about his conservative views on civil rights and privacy. Bork's judicial philosophy was described as an originalist, which emphasized interpreting the Constitution narrowly and based on its original intent.
While he faced opposition, Bork also had supporters who praised his qualifications and commitment to judicial restraint.
1. Robert Bork's nomination was ultimately rejected by the Senate in 1987. President Reagan had nominated him to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, but after a contentious confirmation process, Bork was not confirmed.
2. Based on a news article from the time period, it appears that senators were concerned about Bork's judicial philosophy and its potential impact on issues such as civil rights and privacy. Bork was known for his conservative views and his belief in the original intent of the Constitution.
Some senators felt that his views on issues such as abortion and affirmative action were too extreme.
Bork's judicial philosophy was described as an originalist, meaning that he believed in interpreting the Constitution according to the original intent of its framers. He believed that the Constitution should be interpreted narrowly and that judges should not read into it rights or principles that are not explicitly stated.
Despite the opposition to Bork's nomination, many senators did support him. Some cited his qualifications and experience, while others praised his commitment to originalism and his belief in judicial restraint. They argued that Bork would be a fair and impartial judge who would interpret the law based on its original meaning.
In summary, Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court was ultimately rejected by the Senate due to concerns about his judicial philosophy and its potential impact on civil rights and privacy.
Bork's views were described as an originalist, and while he faced significant opposition, he also had supporters who praised his qualifications and commitment to judicial restraint.
To know more about Robert Bork refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29599750#
#SPJ11
The child who was just smiling brightly looking at you like that.
'The child who was just smiling brightly looking at you like that.' are the lyrics to the song called "Inner Child" by BTS.
"Inner Child" is a song by the popular South Korean boy band BTS. The song was released on February 21, 2020, as part of their album "Map of the Soul: 7". The lyrics of the song express the emotions of a person who is reminiscing about their childhood and the happy memories they had.
The particular line "The child who was just smiling brightly looking at you like that" is a powerful expression of the innocence and joy that children have. It suggests that the child in question was happy, carefree, and unburdened by the worries and struggles of adult life. The lyrics of "Inner Child" are widely interpreted as a reflection of BTS member V's own childhood experiences.
-----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"'The child who was just smiling brightly looking at you like that.' To which song these lyrics belong to?"-----------------
To know more about lyrics , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/872870
#SPJ4
What was the name of the native american who taught the pilgrims about crops that grow well in england
The name of the Native American who taught the Pilgrims about crops that grow well in England was Squanto. Squanto, also known as Tisquantum, was a member of the Patuxet tribe and lived in present-day Massachusetts.
He was captured by English explorers and taken to Europe, where he learned English and European farming techniques. He eventually returned to his homeland, only to find that his tribe had been wiped out by disease.
When the Pilgrims arrived in 1620, Squanto became a valuable asset to the struggling colony. He taught them how to cultivate crops such as corn, beans, and pumpkins, which were essential for their survival.
He also helped the Pilgrims establish peaceful relations with the local Wampanoag tribe, which led to the first Thanksgiving celebration in 1621.
Squanto's knowledge and assistance played a crucial role in the survival of the Pilgrims and the success of their colony. He is remembered as a bridge between the Native American and European cultures, and his legacy continues to be celebrated today.
For more question on Pilgrims visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4679201
#SPJ11
The Ghana Empire?
Choose the items that CORRECTLY describe the Ghana Empire.
It was located in northeast Africa,
Mansa Musa was its most able leader.
It lasted for over 500 years.
Trade of gold was a major economic factor.
It was a site of major gold mines.
It became a major Islamic empire due to the presence of Muslim merchants.
Fell due to the presence of European slave traders.
The Correct statements about Ghana Empire are as follows:
Mansa Musa was its most able leader.
It lasted for over 500 years.
Trade of gold was a major economic factor.
It was a site of major gold mines.
It became a major Islamic empire due to the presence of Muslim merchants.
Fell due to internal rebellion and outside invasions from neighboring empires.
The Ghana Empire was an ancient West African empire that existed between the 6th and 13th centuries. It was located in West Africa, not northeast Africa, specifically in the region that is now Mali and Mauritania. The empire's most able leader was actually Tunka Manin, who ruled during the empire's golden age in the 11th century.
The empire was known for its wealth, which was based primarily on the trade of gold, salt, and other valuable goods. It was strategically located near major gold mines and the trade routes that connected West Africa with North Africa and the Mediterranean.
Islam spread to the empire through the presence of Muslim merchants, but the empire remained religiously diverse. It was not a major Islamic empire, although Islam did have a significant presence.
The Ghana Empire eventually declined and fell in the 13th century due to a combination of factors, including the erosion of trade routes, internal power struggles, and attacks by neighboring empires. The presence of European slave traders was not a significant factor in the empire's decline, as this occurred centuries later during the transatlantic slave trade.
To learn more about Ghana Empire refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2082408
#SPJ11
Do you find anything to be problematic with Section 3 of the resolution, particularly in a democracy?
This is section 3 of the Joint Resolution of Congress H. J. RES 1145 August 7, 1964
âGulf of Tonkin Resolution
Section 3. This resolution shall expire when the
President shall determine that the peace and security
of the area is reasonably assured by international
conditions created by action of the United Nations
or otherwise, except that it may be terminated
earlier by concurrent resolution of the Congress
Section 3 of a concurrent resolution that was earlier passed by Congress could potentially be problematic in a democracy. This section grants the president the authority to use the military to suppress any domestic unrest, which could be seen as an infringement on citizens' constitutional rights.
In a democratic society, it is crucial to protect the freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly. Allowing the president to use military force to suppress protests could undermine these fundamental principles.
It is important to ensure that any such measures are strictly necessary and proportionate and that they do not unduly infringe on the democratic values that we cherish.
To know more about concurrent resolution, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/17574062#
#SPJ11
How did Progressive movement in South Carolina approach child labor differently than the Progressive movement nationwide?
The Progressive movement in South Carolina approached child labor differently than the Progressive movement nationwide by placing a greater emphasis on education and social reform.
While the national movement focused on legislative changes, such as limiting the working hours of children and enforcing minimum age requirements, the South Carolina Progressives aimed to address the root causes of child labor.
They believed that education was key to ending the cycle of poverty that drove children to work in dangerous and exploitative conditions. Additionally, they worked to improve social conditions, such as housing and healthcare, which contributed to the prevalence of child labor in the state.
Overall, the South Carolina Progressive movement sought to create long-lasting change through systemic reform rather than simply addressing the symptoms of child labor.
To know more about social reforms, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/3332629#
#SPJ11
If the united states had joined the league of nations, would the way the world handles conflict today be different?
If the united states had joined the league of nations, it's possible that the world would have a different approach to conflict resolution if the US had joined the League of Nations.
If the United States had joined the League of Nations, it is possible that the way the world handles conflict today would be different. The League of Nations was established after World War I to promote international cooperation and prevent future wars. However, the United States did not join the organization, and without the backing of the most powerful nation in the world, the League was not as effective as it could have been.
If the United States had joined the League, it would have added significant political and economic power to the organization, increasing its influence in international affairs. The U.S. could have used its influence to help the League take more effective measures to prevent aggression and resolve disputes between nations peacefully. This might have prevented some of the conflicts and wars that have occurred since then.
Additionally, the League of Nations was the precursor to the United Nations, which was established after World War II. If the League had been successful, it could have set a precedent for international cooperation that would have made it more likely for the U.S. to join the UN. This could have led to a stronger and more effective UN, with greater support from the U.S., and a greater ability to prevent and resolve conflicts around the world.
Overall, while it is impossible to know for certain how different the world would be if the U.S. had joined the League of Nations, it is clear that the absence of the U.S. weakened the League and made it less effective in promoting international peace and security.
To learn more about League of Nation refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766422
#SPJ11
Which country was home to the first public opera house in 1637?.
Do you think this amendment could be passed today of alcohol?
Answer: No
Explanation: I don't think this amendment couldn't be passed today of alcohol.
No, I think that the eighteenth amendment wouldn't be passed because of the citizens that still buy and sell alcohol, and the economic boost and profit that it provides.
What is the eighteenth amendment?The Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1919 and prohibited the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol within the United States. This amendment, also known as the Prohibition Amendment, was intended to reduce crime, poverty, and other social problems that were associated with alcohol abuse.
The Eighteenth Amendment was the culmination of a long campaign by temperance groups and other reformers who believed that alcohol was a major cause of social ills, including poverty, crime, and domestic violence.
No, I think that the eighteenth amendment wouldn't be passed because of the citizens that still buy and sell alcohol
Learn more about eighteenth amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/12642739
#SPJ2
Which statement is a valid generalization about
the experience of African Americans during the
early Reconstruction period (1865-1870)?
Explain how internal and external factors contributed to change in various states after 1900
after 1900 many states changed due to internal and external influence.
How did the states change after 1900?After 1900, several states changed due to the internal and external influence of different factors, among which the following stand out:
National and international immigration: After 1900, the United States received hundreds of immigrants who came to change the social dynamics that existed up to that moment. In general, this meant a radical change in the way of relating.Internal politics: Some territories were deprived of important political representation, so their leaders began to form their own movements to seek representation in the central government.Confrontations with other countries: In the case of Mexico, it had a lot of influence in the Southwestern States where several battles were fought to recover their lost territories.Learn more about states in: https://brainly.com/question/15858706
#SPJ1
5 Major World Religions Video Follow Along
The video discusses the five major world religions: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism. It explores their origins, beliefs, and practices.
Christianity is based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ, emphasizing salvation through faith and good works. Islam is based on the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, emphasizing submission to God and the Five Pillars of Islam. Judaism is based on the belief in one God and the covenant between God and the Jewish people.
Hinduism is a polytheistic religion based on the belief in karma and reincarnation. Buddhism is based on the teachings of the Buddha, emphasizing the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path to enlightenment.
Learn more about world religions
https://brainly.com/question/4791540
#SPJ4
the pairs.
Match each important text in Judaism to its description
The Torah, also known as the Five Books of Moses, the Nevi'im, which are the books of the Prophets, or additional writings, are all parts of the Hebrew Bible.
contains commentaries on the meanings and applications of Jewish laws ⇒ Talmudbased on literature and writings collected over centuries, including oral histories ⇒ Hebrew Bible.What is Judaism?The Hebrew Bible, also referred to as the Tanakh, is the source of the ancient monotheistic religion known as Judaism. It shares fundamental beliefs and practices with Christianity and Islam, making it the foundation of the Abrahamic religions. Judaism is characterized by a religious life that is in accordance with the Bible and rabbinic traditions, as well as the belief in a single, transcendent God who revealed himself to Abraham, Moses, and the Hebrew prophets. The synagogue is the center of Jewish worship, and religious rituals and customs uphold the Torah's morals and laws.
Incomplete question :
Drag each tile to the correct box to complete the pairs. Match each important text in Judaism to its description.
Tiles
Hebrew Bible Torah Talmud
Pairs
most sacred text in Judaism; includes five books ⇒
contains commentaries on the meanings and applications of Jewish laws ⇒
based on literature and writings collected over centuries, including oral histories ⇒
Learn more about Judaism :
brainly.com/question/28727795
#SPJ1
Question 5
What effect did Spanish and Portuguese colonization have on South American Indians?
Many South Americans thrived in the new colonies.
O South Americans became the ruling class.
O Warfare, disease, and harsh treatment contributed to the death of many natives.
O The colonization did not have an effect on the native tribes.
10 pts
The effect of the colonization on the South American Indians was that Warfare, disease, and harsh treatment contributed to the death of many native. Option C
The effects pf the Spanish and Portuguese colonizationThe Spanish and Portuguese colonization had a profound and lasting impact on the South American Indians.
The arrival of Europeans brought warfare, disease, and forced labor, which resulted in the death of millions of indigenous people.
The conquerors aimed to extract resources and labor from the native population, leading to the enslavement and exploitation of many.
Although some indigenous people did thrive in the new colonial society, they were a small minority.
The vast majority of South American Indians suffered immensely as a result of colonization, with their societies and cultures irrevocably altered or destroyed.
Read more about Colonization at: https://brainly.com/question/510352
#SPJ1
Heroes of the Wild
Study the interactive in the lesson to describe the background and contributions of these key historical figures. Then respond to the reflection question. Your answers should be written in complete sentences.
Lewis Clark Sacajawea York
Describe each
individual’s background.
Describe the
contributions he/she made to the expedition.
Reflection Question
Why was it important to send explorers into the new territory of the United States?
The three most significant members of the Lewis and Clark Expedition were Sacajawea, York, and Lewis because they were "Heroes of the Wild."
What are your thoughts on Heroes of the Wild?Nat Levine wrote the screenplay for Harry S. Webb's American silent Western series Heroes of the Wild, which was distributed by Mascot Pictures in 1927.
In this research, Lewis and Clark were one of the four renowned American men regarded as the "heroes of the wild." York was Clark's slave, and Sacajawea helped them when they needed to communicate with the people.
William Clark and Meriwether Lewis were given the responsibility of leading the Lewis and Clark Expedition across the recently conquered Louisiana Territory by President Thomas Jefferson in 1804.
At the mouth of the Columbia River in present-day Washington state, the first transcontinental voyage across the western United States of America, which went to the Pacific Ocean's coast, came to an end.
The two-year trip laid the foundation for American westward migration. Research has been done extensively on the unexplored interior of North America.
By doing this, they increase public knowledge of the excursions to the Pacific Ocean.
Why was it so crucial to send explorers to the newest part of the US?North America's colonization. To search for wealth and stake out new territories, European nations sent out further explorers. In North America, the struggle for more territory quickly descended into conflict.
Learn more about American westward expansion: https://brainly.com/question/30752907
#SPJ1
Highlight the word(s) modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
nelson muntz tried to scrub the invisible ink out of the woven
carpet.
Word 'scrub' modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
The term "modified" can apply to any form of modification or change done to something. It can relate to adjustments made to real-world things, procedures, and even concepts. For instance, a modified car is one that has undergone some sort of modification, such receiving new components or getting a new coat of paint.
A modified process is one that has undergone some sort of change or adaptation, such as a new technique of production or a different approach to handling customer service. Last but not least, modified concepts are those that have undergone some kind of transformation or adaptation, like a fresh interpretation of an old notion.
To learn more about modification link is here
brainly.com/question/15051675
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Highlight the word(s) modified by the word, clause, or phrase in bold.
"Nelson Muntz tried to scrub the invisible ink out of the woven carpet."
Which ideas are part of civil law in Louisiana? Check all that apply
The ideas that are part of civil law in Louisiana include:
primarily protecting the rights of citizensworking to peacefully resolve disputes between citizens.What ideas are included in civil law in Louisiana?Louisiana follows a civil law system which is based on Roman law rather than English common law. The state law focus on protecting the rights of citizens and promoting peaceful resolution of disputes between citizens.
This includes areas such as contract law, property law, and family law. Civil law also plays a role in regulating businesses and commercial transactions. Criminal law focuses on punishing people who break the law and commit crimes including both misdemeanors and felonies.
Missing options "A: is broken down into two main categories
B:primarily protects the rights of citizens
C:works to peacefully resolve disputes between citizens
D:punishes people who break the law and commit crimes
E:includes petty theft, possession, and other misdemeanors
F:includes burglary, murder, embezzlement, and other felonies
Read more about Louisiana law
brainly.com/question/30437991
#SPJ1
Which best describes the states aligned with the Soviet Union during the Cold War?
A)They supported communism and had prosperous economies. B)They supported communism but faced serious economic challenges. C)They supported capitalism but faced serious economic challenges. D)They were supported financially by the United States
The states aligned with the Soviet Union during the Cold War mostly supported communism, but they faced serious economic challenges. The correct answer is option b.
While some of these countries, such as the Soviet Union itself, had significant natural resources and industrial capacity, they often struggled with economic inefficiencies and poor management that hampered their development.
Additionally, the Soviet Union's policies of central planning and strict state control limited individual freedoms and innovation, leading to a stagnation of economic growth over time.
Many of the countries aligned with the Soviet Union during the Cold War were located in Eastern Europe, which had been occupied by the Soviet Union following World War II.
These countries were often forced to adopt Soviet-style communism and were subject to strict Soviet control, further limiting their economic and political autonomy.
While the Soviet Union did provide some financial and military support to its allies, this support was often tied to strict political and ideological conditions that further limited their independence.
The correct answer is option b.
To know more about cold war refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ11
After listening to the first twelve and a half minutes of Reagan's speech. Do you feel like the United States had a responsibility to Germany to fight for an end to the cold war and the destruction of the Berlin Wall? Why or why not? Provide at least two reasons to support your answer.
The Berlin Wall was not the best way to solve the problems that triggered it hence President Reagan was justified in fighting for the end of the cold war and the destruction of the Wall.
Why is this so?The collapse of the Berlin Wall was the first major step toward German reunification, which was legally completed 339 days later on October 3, 1990, with the dissolution of East Germany and the official reunification of the German state following the democratic lines of the West German Basic Law.
The construction of the Berlin Wall and the following occupation of East and West Germany created an economic divide between the two countries. West Germany was inundated with rich foreign soldiers, who boosted the country's economy, but East Germany suffered greatly under the Soviets' dictatorial government.
Learn more about Ronald Reagan at:
https://brainly.com/question/20945474
#SPJ1
Heroes of the Wild
Study the interactive in the lesson to describe the background and contributions of these key historical figures. Then respond to the reflection question. Your answers should be written in complete sentences.
Lewis Clark Sacajawea York
Describe each
individual’s background.
Describe the
contributions he/she made to the expedition.
Reflection Question
Why was it important to send explorers into the new territory of the United States?
Answer: c
Explanation:
dont use this I need points dont risk your grades on me
How does the first excerpt tie into middle age life?
Literature can provide insights, guidance, and comfort for middle-aged individuals experiencing significant life changes, identity questioning, and physical/emotional challenges.
In general, literature may provide insightful analysis and observations on middle-aged experiences. Middle age may bring about a lot of change, including a change in priorities, self-examination, and physical and mental difficulties. Through the creation of a framework for comprehending and reflecting on these experiences, literature can aid people in navigating these changes.
It can present a variety of viewpoints and narratives that highlight the intricacies of middle age and serve as motivation for one's progress. Literature may also foster a feeling of community and connection, making people feel less alone in their troubles and offering solace and wisdom.
Learn more about Literature:
https://brainly.com/question/30107477
#SPJ4
The correct question will be: How can literature provide insight and guidance for navigating the changes and challenges of middle age while fostering community and connection?
Read the description of the Ottoman Empire.
The Ottoman Empire was an important Islamic empire that lasted from 1299 to 1923. It was known as a "gunpowder empire" because it used advanced military weapons to build and maintain it's influence. At the height of it's power, it covered much of southeastern Europe, Central Asia, and North Africa. It included a powerful central government, state-run educational and judicial systems, and a strong ruthless military that used slaves as the basis for it's manpower. It became powerful in part because of it's geographic position at the center of trade between Europe and Asia.
In a 3 paragraph response, explain how a historian might use each of the organizing principles of region, period, and theme to construct a historical narrative of the ottoman empire. what questions might the historian ask? What is one value and one potential limitation of each approach? Be sure to clearly develop and organize your ideas.
IAQ snsisj historian could use the organizing principle of region to construct a historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire by examining the empire's territorial expansion and the impact it had on the regions it conquered. The historian might ask questions such as: How did the Ottomans conquer and control such a vast territory? What were the economic, social, and cultural effects of Ottoman rule on the various regions it controlled? One value of this approach is that it allows the historian to focus on the specific regions that were most affected by Ottoman rule. However, a potential limitation is that it may overlook broader trends or themes that cut across different regions.
The organizing principle of period could be used by a historian to construct a historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire by examining how the empire changed over time. The historian might ask questions such as: What were the key political, economic, and social developments during different periods of Ottoman history? How did the Ottoman Empire respond to external challenges and internal crises? One value of this approach is that it allows the historian to identify patterns and changes over time. However, a potential limitation is that it may overlook the diversity of experiences within a given period.
The organizing principle of theme could be used by a historian to construct a historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire by examining a particular aspect of Ottoman history in depth. The historian might ask questions such as: How did the Ottoman Empire's military power contribute to its success? How did the Ottoman Empire's religious identity shape its political and social structures? One value of this approach is that it allows the historian to explore a particular theme in detail. However, a potential limitation is that it may overlook the complexity and diversity of Ottoman history as a whole.
Overall, each organizing principle has its strengths and weaknesses, and historians must carefully consider which approach is best suited to their research question. By combining different approaches, historians can construct a more nuanced and comprehensive historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire.
Answer:
A historian could use the organizing principle of region to construct a historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire by examining the empire's territorial expansion and the impact it had on the regions it conquered. The historian might ask questions such as: How did the Ottomans conquer and control such a vast territory? What were the economic, social, and cultural effects of Ottoman rule on the various regions it controlled? One value of this approach is that it allows the historian to focus on the specific regions that were most affected by Ottoman rule. However, a potential limitation is that it may overlook broader trends or themes that cut across different regions.
The organizing principle of period could be used by a historian to construct a historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire by examining how the empire changed over time. The historian might ask questions such as: What were the key political, economic, and social developments during different periods of Ottoman history? How did the Ottoman Empire respond to external challenges and internal crises? One value of this approach is that it allows the historian to identify patterns and changes over time. However, a potential limitation is that it may overlook the diversity of experiences within a given period.
The organizing principle of theme could be used by a historian to construct a historical narrative of the Ottoman Empire by examining a particular aspect of Ottoman history in depth. The historian might ask questions such as: How did the Ottoman Empire's military power contribute to its success? How did the Ottoman Empire's religious identity shape its political and social structures? One value of this approach is that it allows the historian to explore a particular theme in detail. However, a potential limitation is that it may overlook the complexity and diversity of Ottoman history as a whole.
Overall, each organizing principle has its strengths and weaknesses, and historians must carefully consider which approach is best suited to their research question. By combining different approaches, historians can construct a more nuanced and comprehensive historical narrative of the Ottoman Em
1) How did France avoid the worst of the Depression?
2) What standard did both countries hold onto? How did it affect each country?
3) How long did it take for each country to get out of the depression?
No links
France avoid the worst of the Depression by stabilizing the economy.
Both France and the US used the Gold Standard which ensuring stability.
The Great depression lasted 10 years.
Why is this so?The Great Depression was a global economic shock that affected almost every country on the planet. It was a time of economic depression that emerged following a significant drop in stock values in the United States.
The economic contagion began in September and culminated in the October 24 Wall Street stock market meltdown.
The 1929 stock market crash, the collapse of international commerce owing to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, government policies, bank failures and panics, and the collapse of the money supply are all potential causes of the Great Depression.
Learn more about depression at:
https://brainly.com/question/28810167
#SPJ1
America has been characterized as ""isolationist"" and ""neutral"" during the 1920s & 1930s. assess the extent to which this is accurate.
America has been characterized as "isolationist" and "neutral" during the 1920s & 1930s. To assess the extent to which this is accurate, we should look at specific policies and events from that time period.
Firstly, the term "isolationist" refers to the United States' decision to distance itself from international affairs, particularly in Europe. This is evident in the 1920s when the U.S. rejected the League of Nations and refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I.
Additionally, the country pursued protectionist economic policies, such as the Fordney-McCumber Tariff of 1922 and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930, which aimed to protect domestic industries by raising import tariffs.
As for the term "neutral," this is primarily associated with the U.S. policy during the 1930s, especially in response to the rise of fascist and militarist regimes in Europe and Asia.
The Neutrality Acts of 1935, 1936, and 1937 were passed to prevent American involvement in foreign conflicts by prohibiting the sale of arms, loans, and other assistance to belligerent nations. This neutrality stance was maintained until the U.S. entry into World War II in 1941.
In conclusion, the characterization of America as "isolationist" and "neutral" during the 1920s & 1930s is accurate to some extent. The U.S. chose to avoid entanglements in international affairs and maintain neutrality during conflicts, though this stance shifted as the global situation became more dire.
To know more about isolationism refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30123541#
#SPJ11
