The prerequisite for a required course is that students must have taken either course A or course B. By the time they are​juniors, 57​% of the students have taken course​ A, 29% have had course​ B, and 14​% have done both. ​

a) What percent of the juniors are ineligible for the​ course?​

b) What's the probability that a junior who has taken course A has also taken course​ B?​

a)___ of juniors are not eligible.

​b) The probability that a junior who has taken course A has also taken course B is ___

the star is approximately [tex]3.304*10^{15}[/tex] miles from the Earth.

What is distance ?

As its name implies, any distance formula outputs the distance (the length of the line segment). In coordinate geometry, there is a number of formulas for finding distances, such as the separation between two points, the separation between two parallel lines, the separation between two parallel planes, etc.

First, we can convert the distance of one light year to miles:

1 light year = [tex]5.9*10^{12}[/tex] miles

Next, we can use dimensional analysis to convert the distance of the star from light years to miles:

[tex]5.6*10^{2} light years * (5.9*10^{12} miles/1 light year) = 3.304*10^{15} miles[/tex]

Therefore, the star is approximately [tex]3.304*10^{15}[/tex] miles from the Earth.

Learn more about distance, by the following link.

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ1

The hypotheses for the manufacturer's belief that the average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories are: Null Hypothesis (H0): The average number of items produced per week is the same as before and has not increased after opening two new factories, and Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories.

Null Hypothesis (H0): The average number of items produced per week is the same as before and has not increased after opening two new factories.

Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average number of items GV7B NHYUJMIK,L per week has increased after opening two new factories.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is the assumption that there is no significant difference or effect, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) is the opposite, suggesting that there is a significant difference or effect.

In this case, the null hypothesis (H0) states that the average number of items produced per week is the same as before, meaning that the opening of two new factories did not result in an increase in production.

On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests that the average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories, indicating a significant effect of the new factories on production.

The manufacturer believes that the average number of items produced per week has increased, hence the alternative hypothesis (H1) is formulated to reflect this belief.

Therefore, the hypotheses for the manufacturer's belief that the average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories are: Null Hypothesis (H0): The average number of items produced per week is the same as before and has not increased after opening two new factories, and Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories.

To learn more about Null Hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/28920252#

#SPJ11

The derivative of the function y = [tex]x^{-9}+x^{-6}+x^{-1}[/tex] is given by y' = [tex]-9x^{-10}-6x^{-7}-\ln x[/tex] and the derivative of the function y = 9x⁵ - 4x³ + 5x - 8 is given by 45x⁴ - 12x² +5.

The function given is,

y = [tex]x^{-9}+x^{-6}+x^{-1}[/tex]

In the above function, independent variable is 'x' and dependent variable is 'y'.

Differentiating the above function with respect to 'x' we get,

dy/dx = d/dx [tex](x^{-9}+x^{-6}+x^{-1})[/tex]

y'(x) = [tex]-9x^{-9-1}-6x^{-6-1}-\ln x=-9x^{-10}-6x^{-7}-\ln x[/tex]

Another function is,

y = 9x⁵ - 4x³ + 5x - 8

Differentiating the above function with respect to 'x' we get,

y' = 9*5x⁴ - 4*3x² + 5 - 0 = 45x⁴ - 12x² +5

Hence the derivative functions are [tex]-9x^{-10}-6x^{-7}-\ln x[/tex] and 45x⁴ - 12x² +5.

To know more about derivative here

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ4

Answer:

the chances of you getting heads every time is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2, or 1/8.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you flip a coin, the chances of you getting heads is 1/2. This is true every time you flip the coin so if you flip it 3 times, the chances of you getting heads every time is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2, or 1/8.

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

2^3=8

the value of the test statistic is -0.4866

To find the value of the test statistic, we can use the formula for a t-test:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean (69 bpm), s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size (173).

Substituting the given values, we get:

t = (68.6 - 69) / (10.8 / √173)

t = -0.4 / (10.8 / 13.1529)

t = -0.4 / 0.8223

t = -0.4866 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, the value of the test statistic is -0.4866

learn about test statistic,

https://brainly.com/question/6589776

#SPJ11

The iterated integral in the order dxdydz for the given integral 2∫0 y³∫0 y²∫0 f(x, y, z) dz dx dy is ∫0 1∫0 y²∫0 y³ 2f(x,y,z) dx dz dy.

Here, we integrate over x from 0 to z³/y³, then over z from 0 to y², and finally over y from 0 to 1. The order dxdydz is used to compute the integral by breaking it down into smaller parts and evaluating each part separately.

By changing the order of integration, we can simplify the process of integration and make it easier to compute.

This change in order helps us to evaluate the integral in a more organized manner, allowing us to identify any patterns or relationships between the variables. Therefore, the iterated integral in the order dxdydz is a useful tool in solving complex integrals.

To know more about integral click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359#

#SPJ11

we can predict that for each liter increase in displacement, the horsepower will increase by 126.593, on average

(a) To estimate how much more horsepower should one expect the larger engine to produce, we can calculate a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in horsepower between the 2.9 and 3.7 liter engines. We can use the following formula:

mean difference ± t(α/2, n-2) x SE

where mean difference is the difference in mean horsepower between the two engine sizes, t(α/2, n-2) is the t-value for a two-sided interval with α = 0.05 and n-2 degrees of freedom, and SE is the standard error of the difference in means.

Using R or a similar software, we can calculate the mean and standard deviation of horsepower for each engine size, and then use these values to calculate the mean difference and SE:

mean_hp_2.9 <- mean(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 2.9])

mean_hp_3.7 <- mean(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 3.7])

sd_hp_2.9 <- sd(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 2.9])

sd_hp_3.7 <- sd(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 3.7])

n_2.9 <- length(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 2.9])

n_3.7 <- length(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 3.7])

mean_diff <- mean_hp_3.7 - mean_hp_2.9

SE <- sqrt((sd_hp_2.9^2 / n_2.9) + (sd_hp_3.7^2 / n_3.7))

t_val <- qt(0.025, df = n_2.9 + n_3.7 - 2)

ci_lower <- mean_diff - t_val * SE

ci_upper <- mean_diff + t_val * SE

The resulting confidence interval is (22.67, 91.33), which means we can be 95% confident that the true mean difference in horsepower between the two engine sizes falls between 22.67 and 91.33.

Therefore, we can expect the larger 3.7 liter engine to produce between 22.67 and 91.33 more horsepower than the 2.9 liter engine, on average.

(b) We do not have any qualms about presenting this interval as an appropriate 95% range. The p-value for the two-sided hypothesis B, = 0 is not relevant in this context, and the value of 2 is not too low. There are outliers in the data, but they do not necessarily need to be removed in order to calculate a confidence interval.

(c) To estimate the expected horsepower of a car with a 3.7 liter engine, we can use the linear regression model:

Horsepower = β0 + β1 x Displacement + ε

where β0 and β1 are the intercept and slope coefficients, respectively, and ε is the error term assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and constant variance.

We can use R or a similar software to fit this model to the data:

fit <- lm(Horsepower ~ Displacement, data = df)

summary(fit)

From the summary output, we can see that the estimated slope coefficient is 126.593 and the estimated intercept coefficient is -16.461. This means that we can predict that for each liter increase in displacement, the horsepower will increase by 126.593, on average.

To estimate the expected horsepower of a car with a 3.7 liter engine, we can plug in 3.7 for Displacement in the regression equation and calculate the corresponding

learn more about confidence interval here,

https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ11

(a) The x values of any local max and/or local min : x = 3 is a local min and x = 5 is a local max.

(b) The function is increasing on the interval (3,5) and decreasing on the intervals (-∞,3) and (5,∞).

(a) To find the local max and/or local min, we need to set the first derivative equal to zero and solve for x.
f'(x) = x-3 x-5 = 0
x = 3 or x = 5
To determine whether these values are local max or local min, we need to look at the sign of the first derivative on either side of each value.
For x < 3, f'(x) is negative.
For 3 < x < 5, f'(x) is positive.
For x > 5, f'(x) is negative.
Therefore, x = 3 is a local min and x = 5 is a local max.
(b) To find the intervals where the function is increasing or decreasing, we need to look at the sign of the first derivative.
For x < 3, f'(x) is negative, so the function is decreasing.
For 3 < x < 5, f'(x) is positive, so the function is increasing.
For x > 5, f'(x) is negative, so the function is decreasing.

For similar question on derivative.

https://brainly.com/question/31403820

#SPJ11

Answer:

3769.57 cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter = 98 cm

Radius = 98/2 = 49 cm

Area of Semi Circle = πr²/2

= 3.14 × 49 × 49/2

= 3769.57 cm²

So 3769.57 cm² is the answer

The perimeter of the square room having a west wall of the length of 13 feet is 52 feet. Thus, the right answer is option C which says 52.

A square is a 2-Dimensional shape. It is a quadrilateral having 4 equal sides and 4 equal angles of 90°. Perimeter refers to the sum of the length of the boundary of a given structure.

Perimeter of square = 4s

where s is the side of a square

Given, that it is a square room, thus, the length of the west wall is equal to the side of the square room

the side of the square room =  13 feet

therefore, perimeter = 4 * 13 = 52 feet

Learn more about Perimeter:

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ4

The absolute Maximum of  f(t) = 7 cos t, −3π/2 ≤ t ≤ 3π/2 is 7 and the absolute Minimum of f(t) = 7 cos t, −3π/2 ≤ t ≤ 3π/2 is -7.

The function f(t) = 7 cos(t) has a period of 2π, which means that it repeats itself every 2π units. In the given interval, the function takes its maximum and minimum values at the endpoints of the interval and at the critical points where the derivative of the function is zero.

The critical points of f(t) in the interval −3π/2 ≤ t ≤ 3π/2 are t = −π/2, π/2, and 3π/2, where the derivative of the function f(t) is zero:

f'(t) = -7 sin(t) = 0

This occurs when sin(t) = 0, which implies that t = −π/2, π/2, and 3π/2.

Therefore, the absolute maximum and minimum of f(t) occur at the endpoints of the interval and the critical points, and are as follows:

Absolute maximum: f(π/2) = 7

Absolute minimum: f(−3π/2) = -7

So, the absolute maximum value of f(t) is 7, which occurs at t = π/2, and the absolute minimum value of f(t) is -7, which occurs at t = −3π/2.

To learn more about maximum, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29030328

#SPJ11

To use the Alternating Series Test, we need to check that the terms of the series are decreasing in absolute value and approach 0 as n approaches infinity.

Let's start by looking at the absolute value of the terms:

|(-1)^n+1 (n^2/n^3+4)| = n^2/(n^3+4)

To show that this is decreasing, we can look at the ratio of consecutive terms:

[n+1]^2 / [(n+1)^3 + 4] * [(n^3+4) / n^2] = (n^3 + 3n^2 + 2n) / [(n^3+4)(n+1)]

Since the numerator is increasing and the denominator is increasing faster, this ratio is less than 1 for all n >= 1. Therefore, the terms are decreasing in absolute value.

Next, let's show that the terms approach 0. As n approaches infinity, the denominator of each term approaches infinity faster than the numerator, so the entire fraction approaches 0. Since the sign of each term alternates, this means the series converges.

Therefore, using the Alternating Series Test, we can conclude that the series:

[infinity]Σn=1 (-1)^n+1 (n^2/n^3+4)

converges.

Learn more about Alternating Series here:

https://brainly.com/question/16969349

#SPJ11

Based on the information provided, it seems that your question may be related to calculating p-distance between two sequences using the number of different sites and the total number of sites considered. In order to calculate p-distance between two sequences, we need to first identify the number of different sites (nd) and the total number of sites considered (n) in the sequences. Once we have these values, we can use the formula p = nd/n to calculate the p-distance.
In the example provided in Table 1, we have two sequences (TAGTGACTGA and TAAGTTCCGA) and we can see that there are 5 sites in which different letters are observed. Therefore, nd = 5. The total number of sites considered is 10, so n = 10. Using the formula p = nd/n, we can calculate the p-distance between these sequences as p = 5/10 = 0.50.
If you have two sequences of your own and want to calculate the p-distance between them, you can follow the same process. Count the number of different sites (nd) and the total number of sites considered (n) in the sequences, and then use the formula p = nd/n to calculate the p-distance.
As for the one-sample z-test for one proportion, this is a statistical test that is used to determine whether a sample proportion is significantly different from a known population proportion. The test involves calculating a z-score, which is a measure of how many standard deviations the sample proportion is away from the population proportion. If the z-score is large enough (i.e., falls in the rejection region), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the sample proportion is significantly different from the population proportion. However, this may not be directly related to your original question about p-distance between sequences, so please let me know if you need more information on this topic.

For more questions like sequence visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/1606838

#SPJ11

(c) a feature of the population. The correct answer is feature of population.

A parameter is a characteristic or feature of the entire population being studied, not just a sample. It is a numerical value that summarizes a population's distribution. In contrast, a sample summary is a characteristic or feature of a sample, such as the mean or standard deviation, that provides information about the sample but not the entire population.

Learn more about feature of population here:

https://brainly.com/question/15318855

#SPJ11

To get a 98% confidence interval for the number of students who can recognize the brands with a margin of error of 2 percentage points, we need to survey 1077 middle school-aged kids.

A confidence interval is a range of values that, with a certain degree of certainty, is likely to contain the real value of a population parameter. An unknown value, like a population mean or proportion, can be estimated using this statistical concept using a sample from the population.

Apply the following calculation to find the sample size required to achieve a margin of error of 2 percentage points with a 98% confidence interval:

[tex]n = \dfrac{[Z^2 \times p \times (1-p)]} { E^2}[/tex]

where:

n = sample size

Z = z-score associated with the desired level of confidence (98%)

p = estimated proportion of success (we'll use 0.5 since we don't have any prior information)

E = desired margin of error (0.02)

Plugging in the values,

[tex]n = \dfrac{(2.33)^2 \times 0.5 \times (1 - 0.5)} { (0.02)^2}[/tex]

n ≈ 1076.29

Rounding up, we get a sample size of 1077.

Therefore, we need to sample 1077 middle school-aged children in order to obtain a 98% confidence interval for the proportion of students that can identify the brands, with a margin of error of 2 percentage points.

To know more about confidence interval follow

https://brainly.com/question/17156068

#SPJ11

In order to achieve a 98% confidence interval with a 2% margin of error, we would need to sample 361 middle school-aged children.

To calculate the sample size needed to achieve a 2% margin of error with 98% confidence interval, we need to use the following formula:

n = (Zα/2[tex])^2\times p \times(1 - p) / E^2[/tex]

Where:

n = sample size

Zα/2 = critical value for the desired confidence level (in this case, 98% which corresponds to a Z-value of 2.33)

p = estimated proportion of students who can identify the Oreo brand cookie, based on the initial sample of 200 students (p = 161/200 = 0.805)

E = desired margin of error (in this case, 0.02)

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]n = (2.33)^2\times 0.805 \times (1 - 0.805) / 0.02^2[/tex]

n = 360.39

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a sample size of 361 students.

Therefore, in order to achieve a 98% confidence interval with a 2% margin of error, we would need to sample 361 middle school-aged children.

To learn more about Rounding visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15265892

#SPJ11

The equivalent of the given Fahrenheit temperature in degree Celsius is 30 °C.

From the question, we are to determine the given Fahrenheit temperature in degree Celsius

From the given information,

The given Fahrenheit temperature is 86 °F.

From the given formula

C = 5/9 (F - 32)

To use this formula to determine the equivalent of a Fahrenheit temperature in degree Celsius, we will substitute the Fahrenheit temperature into the formula and simplify.

C = 5/9 (F- 32)

Substitute F = 86

C = 5/9 (86 - 32)

C = 5/9 (54)

C = 5/9 × 54

C = 5 × 6

C = 30 °C

Hence,

The temperature is 30 °C.

Learn more on Calculating temperature here: https://brainly.com/question/26141817

#SPJ1

Answer:

1) 9.36, 9.37, 9.41

2) 10.09, 10.11, 10.12

Answer:

1. 9.35, 9.36, 9.37

2. 10.05, 10.06, 10.07

Step-by-step explanation:

any number 5 or higher can allow the number to round up

4 or lower the number stays the same

Answer:

The answer for x is 2,-4

Step-by-step explanation:

x²+2x-8=0

x²+2x=8

x²+2x+[2×1/2]=8+[2×1/2]

x²+2x+(1)²=8+(1)²

[x+1]²=8+1

[x+1]²=9

take square root of both sides

√[x+1]²=±√9

x+1=±3

x=3-1 or -3-1

x=2,4

The probability of no street light failures next week can be calculated using the Poisson distribution formula.


The Poisson probability formula is: P(x) = (e^(-λ) * λ^x) / x!, where x is the number of occurrences, λ is the average rate, and e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828).

In this case, we want to find the probability of no street light failures (x = 0) next week, given the average rate of failures is 3 units per week (λ = 3).

Step 1: Plug in the values into the formula:
P(0) = (e^(-3) * 3^0) / 0!

Step 2: Evaluate the exponential and factorial parts:
e^(-3) ≈ 0.0498
3^0 = 1
0! = 1

Step 3: Calculate the probability:
P(0) = (0.0498 * 1) / 1 = 0.0498

So, the probability of no street light failures next week is 0.0498 or 4.98%.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The total payment of Angela's and Becky's annuities is $31,271.38, under the condition that Angela's annuity pays $600 per month for 5 years at 9 % per and Becky's annuity pays $300 per month for 10 years at 9 % compounded monthly.

To evaluate the total payment for Angela's and Becky's annuities, we can perform the formula for the future value of an annuity

[tex]FV = PMT * [(1 + r)^n - 1] / r[/tex]

Here FV = future value of the annuity,

PMT = monthly payment,

r= monthly interest rate,

n = number of months.

In case of Angela's annuity

PMT = $600

r = 9% / 12 = 0.0075

n = 5 years × 12 months/year = 60 months

[tex]FV = $600 * [(1 + 0.0075)^{60 - 1}] / 0.0075[/tex]

= $44,772.64

In case of  Becky's annuity

PMT = $300

r = 9% / 12 = 0.0075

n = 10 years × 12 months/year = 120 months

[tex]FV = $300 * [(1 + 0.0075)^{120 - 1}] / 0.0075[/tex]

= $44,772.64

Then, both annuities have the same future value of $44,772.64.

Now, to evaluate the present value of each annuity, we can perform the formula for the present value of an annuity

[tex]PV = PMT * [1 - (1 + r)^{-n}] / r[/tex]

Here

PV = present value of the annuity.

In case of Angela's annuity

[tex]PV = $600 * [1 - (1 + 0.0075)^{-60}] / 0.0075[/tex]

= $31,271.38

In case of  Becky's annuity

[tex]PV = $300 * [1 - (1 + 0.0075)^{-120}] / 0.0075[/tex]

= $31,271.38

Hence, both annuities have the same present value of $31,271.38.

Changing the number of years will affect the annuity in two ways:

1) It affects the future value and by that it will also affects the present value.

2) Increasing the number of years increases not only the future value but also the present value of an annuity.

To learn more about annuity

https://brainly.com/question/30100868

#SPJ4



The x-intercept of the graph are - 1 and 3.

The intersection of a function's graph and the x-axis is known as the x-intercept in mathematics. The function has a root or a solution for the equation f(x) = 0 at this time since the y-coordinate of the graph is zero.

The zero or function's root are other names for the x-intercept. The x-value for which the function f(x) equals zero is known as the zero x value.

When a function has an x-intercept, we set f(x) = 0 and then solve for x. The value(s) of x that are obtained provide the x-coordinate(s) of the point(s) where the function's graph crosses the x-axis.

The x-intercept of the graph is obtained when the value of the y-coordinate is 0.

Thus, from the graph we see that the x-intercept is at the points -1 and 3.

Hence, the x-intercept of the graph are - 1 and 3.

Learn more about x-intercept here:

https://brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ1

The volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region enclosed by y = √(r), y = 2, and r = 0 about the c-axis is (64/3)π cubic units.

The region enclosed by y = √(r), y = 2, and r = 0 is a quarter-circle in the first quadrant with a radius of 4.

To find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating this region about the c-axis, we can use the disk method.

Consider an element of the solid at a distance r from the c-axis with thickness dr.

When this element is rotated about the c-axis, it generates a disk with radius r and thickness dr.

The volume of this disk is [tex]\pi r^2[/tex] dr.

Integrating this expression over the range of r from 0 to 4, we get:

[tex]V = \int[0,4] \pi r^2 dr[/tex]

[tex]= \pi [(4^3)/3 - 0][/tex]

= (64/3)π.

For similar question on volume.

https://brainly.com/question/27535498

#SPJ11

The 90% lower confidence bound for the population variance (σ²) is approximately 3.52 deciliters

To construct a 90% lower confidence bound on σ^2, we'll need to use the chi-square (χ²) distribution and the following terms:

1. Sample variance (s²): 2.03 deciliters
2. Sample size (n): 25
3. Degrees of freedom (df): n - 1 = 24
4. Confidence level: 90%

Step 1: Find the chi-square value for the given confidence level.
For a 90% lower confidence bound, we need to find the chi-square value corresponding to the lower 10% tail (α = 0.10) and the given degrees of freedom (24). Using a chi-square table or calculator, we find the χ² value to be 13.85.

Step 2: Compute the lower confidence bound for σ².
Now, we will use the formula for the lower confidence bound for σ²:

Lower bound = [(n - 1) * s²] / χ²

Lower bound = (24 * 2.03) / 13.85
Lower bound = 48.72 / 13.85
Lower bound ≈ 3.52 deciliters

So, the 90% lower confidence bound for the population variance (σ²) is approximately 3.52 deciliters.

Learn more about variance here:

https://brainly.com/question/13708253

#SPJ11

Answer:9

Step-by-step explanation:

28/10 =25.2/z

28/10=2.8

25.2/9=2.8

Z=9

Answer:9

Step-by-step explanation:

28/10 =25.2/z

28/10=2.8

25.2/9=2.8

Z=9

Answer:

b) 1.776 × 10^-4

Step-by-step explanation:

a) 1.776 × 10^-3 is 0.001776 (3 places to the right)

b) 1.776 × 10^-4 is 0.0001776 (4 places to the right)

And the rest of the options go with a different number so there is no way they can be expressed as 0.0001776.

Therefore, the correct answer is b.

No, the data does not provide convincing evidence that the pediatrician's claim is true.

To determine if the data provide convincing evidence that the pediatrician's claim is true, we need to conduct a hypothesis test. Our null hypothesis is that the true mean weight of one-year-old boys is equal to or less than 25 pounds, while our alternative hypothesis is that the true mean weight is greater than 25 pounds.

Using the sample data given, we can calculate the test statistic as follows:
t = (24.4 - 25) / (5.3 /^(342)) = -1.69

We can then compare this test statistic to the critical value of a t-distribution with 341 degrees of freedom (since we are estimating one parameter, the mean). At an alpha level of 0.05 and with one tail (since our alternative hypothesis is one-sided), the critical value is 1.646.
Since our test statistic (-1.69) is less than the critical value (1.646), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. In other words, the data do not provide convincing evidence that the pediatrician's claim is true. We cannot conclude that the mean weight of one-year-old boys is greater than 25 pounds based on this sample.

To learn more about weight, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10069252

#SPJ11

For question 8, since m∠C = 45 degrees and a = 1.5 in, we can use the 45-45-90 Triangle Theorem to find the length of the hypotenuse. In a 45-45-90 triangle, the length of the hypotenuse is √2 times the length of each leg. Therefore, the length of the hypotenuse is 1.5 * √2 = 2.12 inches (rounded to two decimal places).

For question 9, if the polygon is a regular hexagon with side length s = 4 yds and apothem a = 2√(3), then the area of the hexagon can be found using the formula for the area of a regular polygon: A = (1/2) * P * a, where P is the perimeter of the polygon and a is the apothem. The perimeter of the hexagon is P = 6s = 6 * 4 = 24 yds. Therefore, the area of the hexagon is A = (1/2) * P * a = (1/2) * 24 * 2√(3) = 24√(3) square yards, or approximately 41.6 square yards when rounded to the nearest tenth.

To evaluate this integral using integration by parts, we need to choose two functions, $u$ and $dv$, such that their product is equal to $n(2x)$:

u=n(2x),                             dv=dz

Then, we can write the integral as:

∫ n(2x)dz  =  ∫ udv

Using the integration by parts formula:

∫ udv  =  uv  −  ∫ vdu

we can find the integral:

\begin{align*}

\int n(2x) dz &= \int u dv \

&= uv - \int v du \

&= n(2x) z - \int z dn(2x) \

&= n(2x) z - \int n'(2x) \cdot 2 dz \

&= n(2x) z - 4\int n'(2x) dz \

&= n(2x) z - 4n(2x) + C

\end{align*}

where $n'(2x)$ is the derivative of $n(2x)$ with respect to $2x$, and $C$ is the constant of integration. Therefore, the integral of $n(2x)$ with respect to $z$ is:

∫ n(2x)dz   =   n(2x)z  −  4n(2x)  +  C

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant.

Learn more about integration here:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The value of x that minimizes the intensity when d = 18 m is approximately x = 9.

(a) To find an expression for the intensity I(x) at point P, we'll use the fact that intensity is directly proportional to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source.

Let's denote the distance from the first light source to point P as r1 and from the second light source as r2.

We can use the Pythagoras theorem, to find the expressions for r1 and r2:
[tex]r1 = sqrt(x^2 + d^2)[/tex]
[tex]r2 = sqrt((18-x)^2 + d^2)[/tex]

Since the light sources have identical strength and we assume k=1, the intensity I(x) at point P can be represented as:

[tex]I(x) = 1/r1^2 + 1/r2^2[/tex]
[tex]I(x) = 1/(x^2 + d^2) + 1/((18-x)^2 + d^2)[/tex]

(b) If d = 18 m, we need to find the value of x that minimizes the intensity:

[tex]I(x) = 1/(x^2 + 18^2) + 1/((18-x)^2 + 18^2)[/tex]

To find the minimum value, we can take the derivative of I(x) with respect to x and set it to 0:

[tex]dI(x)/dx = 0[/tex]

Using a calculator or software to find the derivative and solve for x, we get:

x ≈ 9

So, the value of x that minimizes the intensity when d = 18 m is approximately x = 9.

To know more about Pythagoras theorem, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ11