Answer: C
Explanation:
The phrase “to form a more perfect union” is included in the Preamble of the United States Constitution as one of the reasons for creating a new Constitution. This phrase refers to the desire to improve upon the government established under the Articles of Confederation, which had proven to be ineffective in addressing many of the challenges facing the newly independent states. The new Constitution was intended to create a stronger and more effective federal government that would be better able to address issues such as trade, defense, and foreign affairs. So the correct answer would be “because the government under the Articles of Confederation had not been effective” (Option C).
. The Siege of Yorktown was considered the final battle, but the Revolutionary War did not officially end for two more years until _____.
The Revolutionary War did not officially end for two more years until the Treaty of Paris was signed.
When did the Revolutionary War officially end?The Siege of Yorktown marked major victory of American forces over the British but its did not officially end the war. The conflict continued for two more years until the Treaty of Paris was signed on September 3, 1783.
This treaty recognized independence of the United States and established the boundaries between the new nation and British North America. It also set terms for the return of property and prisoners of war which included provisions for future trade between the two nations.
Read more about Siege of Yorktown
brainly.com/question/1594249
#SPJ1
Need this answered fast!!
When summarized, the passage becomes, " The men washed their hands in sausage water; waste and debris were added to the sausage mix, which was then sold as breakfast."
How to summarize text ?To summarize a written work, locate the primary theme or significant points and compress them into a short statement without losing their fundamental import.
It is vital to pinpoint the critical notions or concepts of the text when providing a summary and deliver them in an easily comprehensible and succinct manner. A well-constructed synopsis will be more concise than the original writing but still capture the primary idea and significant particulars contained within it.
Find out more on summarization at https://brainly.com/question/30128637
#SPJ1
Why did military leaders overthrow governments of chile and Argentina in 1970
Answer: They feared their governments were moving toward communism.
Explanation:
Help me plesee
Consider the following conversation
ruby: I like initiating conversations and getting to know new people when at social
Angela: Quite the contrary! I would never bother myself to talk to no one if I was not asked events. to. I prefer that people make effort to reach out for me.
Jake: For girls like you. I do not encourage this behavior as it might put you in contact with wrong people. Besides what kind of girl would they think you are if you do so!
1. What is this difference in interpreting the situation called?
Answer:words
Explanation:
Mention any four challenges of sustainable development in Nepal.
Notwithstanding recent economic improvement, Nepal still confronts obstacles on the path to sustainable development, which have been made worse by recurring natural disasters, diseases, and high inflation.
Such issues include a lack of reliable data, the need for leaders to choose their goals, the complexity of the challenges local governments sometimes confront, population expansion, etc. These were the main difficulties encountered in Nepal when adopting sustainable development.
The minimization of disaster risk must be a top priority while carrying out development projects in Nepal. As one of the disaster-prone areas in the world, Nepal experiences horrible human casualties and infrastructure damage every year. In Nepal, it is necessary to create infrastructure and facilities that can withstand natural calamities. According to Jwala Pandey, a disaster risk reduction specialist, "risk reduction measures should be adopted before carrying out developmental activities such as building houses, bridges, or roads in Nepal."
To learn more about sustainable development, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17411145
Intro to Sociology
True or False: Engels wrote about how a society that allows capitalism to go unregulated will create deplorable living conditions, low wages and physical and mental exhaustion of workers.
True. Engels wrote about how a society that allows capitalism to go unregulated will create deplorable living conditions, low wages and physical and mental exhaustion of workers
What does Friedrich Engels wrote?Friedrich Engels, a German philosopher and social scientist, co-authored "The Communist Manifesto" with Karl Marx, which criticized the exploitative nature of capitalism and predicted its inevitable collapse.
Engels also wrote extensively about the deplorable living conditions, low wages, and physical and mental exhaustion of workers in capitalist societies, arguing that these were inevitable consequences of unregulated capitalism. His works were influential in the development of socialist and communist political movements.
Lear more about Sociology at https://brainly.com/question/22407196
#SPJ1
civic values
duties that citizens are expected to perform, like educating themselves,
participating, and working together
donate
democratic responsibilities
interest group
The duties that citizens are expected to perform, like educating themselves, participating, and working together are known as "democratic responsibilities."
What are democratic responsibilitiesIn a democratic society, citizens have certain responsibilities that go beyond their individual rights and freedoms.
These responsibilities include educating themselves about the issues and candidates, participating in the democratic process through voting and other forms of civic engagement, and working together with others to promote the common good.
Read more on democratic responsibilities here https://brainly.com/question/12446541
#SPJ1
How does the concept of a supply chain differ from the idea of a value chain?
Answer:
The main difference between a value chain and a supply chain is that the supply chain deals with building the product and getting it to the consumer, while the value chain looks for ways to enhance the product's value as it moves along that supply chain.
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
Explanation:
Answer:
In summary, while both supply chain and value chain involve the activities that create and deliver products or services, a supply chain focuses on the physical flow of goods and services, while a value chain looks at all the activities involved in creating value for the customer.
Explanation:
The concepts of supply chain and value chain are related but have distinct differences.
A supply chain refers to the network of organizations and processes involved in the production and delivery of a product or service to the end customer. It includes all the activities required to transform raw materials into finished products and transport them to the customer, such as sourcing, manufacturing, logistics, and distribution. The focus of a supply chain is on the efficient and effective flow of goods and services from suppliers to customers.
On the other hand, a value chain refers to all the activities that a company performs to create value for its customers. It includes both primary activities such as inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and service, as well as support activities such as procurement, technology development, human resource management, and firm infrastructure. The focus of a value chain is on identifying and optimizing the activities that add value to the customer and enable the company to gain a competitive advantage.
In summary, while both supply chain and value chain involve the activities that create and deliver products or services, a supply chain focuses on the physical flow of goods and services, while a value chain looks at all the activities involved in creating value for the customer.
Intervetions strategies to reduce restrictions
Answer:
Explanation:
To reduce restrictions, it is important to identify the source of the restrictions and determine the most effective intervention strategies. Here are some general intervention strategies that could be used to reduce restrictions:
Education and awareness: Educating people about the importance of respecting the rights and freedoms of others, and raising awareness about the negative consequences of overly restrictive policies can help to reduce restrictions.
Compromise and negotiation: Encouraging open dialogue and compromise between different groups can help to reduce the need for restrictions. By finding mutually agreeable solutions, it may be possible to address concerns without imposing overly restrictive measures.
Alternative approaches: Identifying alternative approaches to achieving the same goals can help to reduce the need for restrictive policies. For example, instead of banning a particular activity outright, it may be possible to regulate it in a way that minimizes negative impacts.
Incremental change: Gradually reducing restrictions over time can help to mitigate the negative effects of sudden changes. This can be particularly effective when combined with ongoing evaluation and monitoring of the impacts of the changes.
Legal action: In some cases, legal action may be necessary to challenge overly restrictive policies. This can be particularly effective when combined with public advocacy and awareness-raising efforts.
Empowering affected groups: Empowering groups that are most affected by restrictive policies can help to give them a voice and ensure that their concerns are taken into account. This can be done through a variety of means, such as involving them in decision-making processes or providing resources to help them advocate for their rights.
Ultimately, the most effective intervention strategies will depend on the specific context and nature of the restrictions in question. It may be necessary to use a combination of different strategies to achieve the desired outcomes.
in the spirit of ubuntu, how would you promote social cohesion and interdependence in your inclusive classroom
To promote them, I would encourage students to work collaboratively and value eachother perspectives and contributions.
How can social cohesion and interdependence be fostered?An effective way to promote social cohesion and interdependence is to create opportunities for students to work together on group projects and assignments. By assigning tasks that require cooperation and communication, they can learn to rely on and appreciate one another's strengths and abilities.
Encouraging students to share their personal experiences and backgrounds can help foster a sense of empathy and understanding among classmates. Also, the modeling and reinforcing respectful communication and behavior can create a positive classroom culture that values inclusivity and interdependence.
Read more about ubuntu
brainly.com/question/28379442
#SPJ1
What two new political parties faced off in the election of 1828
The two new political parties that faced off in the United States presidential election of 1828 were the Democratic Party and the National Republican Party.
What were the major parties for the 1828 presidential election?During the 1828 presidential election, the incumbent president, John Quincy Adams, represented the National Republican Party, while his challenger, Andrew Jackson, represented the newly formed Democratic Party.
The election was a rematch of the 1824 election, which had been decided by the House of Representatives in favor of Adams despite Jackson winning the popular vote.
The 1828 election was significant because it was characterized by intense campaigning and personal attacks, and it marked the beginning of a new era in American politics, with the Democratic Party emerging as a dominant force for the next several decades.
Read more about the 1828 election at brainly.com/question/28205905.
#SPJ1
Quiz
1
Select the paragraph from the section "Electoral College Votes Determined The President that explains one way that runnin
for president a long time ago was the SAME as running for president today.
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
In those days, the states chose electors. These were the people who were designated to vote in the
election. State governments picked the electors in most states. In other states, certain people chose the
electors. In some states, all electoral votes went to one party. Other states split electors among districts.
Unlike today, each party nominated two people for the presidency. The Federalist Party chose Adams
and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina. In addition to Jefferson, the Republican Party
chose Aaron Burr. Jefferson's second-place finish in the 1796 election had made him vice president.
The 1800 election was different than today's. By law, each of the 138 members of the Electoral College
casts two votes for president. The House of Representatives would vote to choose the president if the
people running tied or did not get most of the votes.
Back then, those running for president left the campaigning to other people in their parties. However,
like today, people running for office did what they could to help their own party. It was common for
people running for office to attack each other by saying mean things publicly.
Other
Option D:
Back then, those running for president left the campaigning to other people in their parties. However,
like today, people running for office did what they could to help their own party. It was common for
people running for office to attack each other by saying mean things publicly.
Describe the major points of the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Explain whether it was successful or not, especially since another Civil Rights Act was passed 8 years later.
The major points of the act were:
The creation of a Commission on Civil Rights to investigate and report on issues related to discrimination based on race, color, religion, or national origin.The establishment of a Civil Rights Division within the Department of Justice to enforce civil rights laws and prosecute violators.The protection of voting rights, including the authorization of federal lawsuits against those who violated individuals' voting rights.What are the major points of the Civil Rights Act of 1957?While the Civil Rights Act of 1957 was an important step forward for civil rights in the United States, it was not as successful as hoped. The act faced significant opposition, particularly from Southern Democrats who were strongly opposed to desegregation and civil rights.
Eight years later, in 1965, another Civil Rights Act was passed which was much more comprehensive and effective. The Civil Rights Act of 1965 strengthened voting rights protections and removed many of the obstacles that had prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote. It also prohibited discrimination in employment, education, and housing, among other areas.
Learn more about Civil Rights Act of 1957 here:https://brainly.com/question/12447824
#SPJ1
How does an economist compare the standard of living in two different countries?
A.by measuring physical capital
B.by seeing how the GDP is distributed
C.by looking at the quality of life
D.(GradPoint Correct)by comparing real GDP per capita
An economist would compare the standard of living in two different countries D. by comparing real GDP per capita
What is real GDP per capita?Real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita is a measure of the total economic output of a country divided by its population, adjusted for inflation. It reflects the average level of economic activity per person in a given country and can be used as a proxy for the standard of living.
By comparing the real GDP per capita of two different countries, an economist can assess the relative economic well-being of each country's citizens. This comparison takes into account the differences in population size and the effects of inflation, which allows for a more accurate comparison of economic output.
Find out more on real GDP per capita at https://brainly.com/question/1317010
#SPJ1
What are the negative consequences of trade? Consider the Kings of
Ghana or Mansa Musa's Hajj when writing your answer
in presser v. illinois (1886) what did the supreme court decide about militias?
In Presser v. Illinois (1886), the Supreme Court decided that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution did not prevent states from regulating or prohibiting private militia groups.
What happened in Presser v. Illinois?The case involved a challenge to an Illinois law that prohibited private militia groups from assembling and drilling without the approval of the governor or other state officials. The defendant argued that this law violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms and form militias.
However, the Supreme Court disagreed and upheld the law, ruling that the Second Amendment only applied to the federal government, not the states.
The Court also held that states had the power to regulate or prohibit private militia groups, as this was necessary for the preservation of public peace and order.
Find out more on Presser v. Illinois at https://brainly.com/question/24943203
#SPJ1
11. We currently pay well over minimum wage to the people who come to pick up our trash. Which theory uses this as part of its argument to keep our current capitalist economgic system?
The theory that uses this as part of its argument to keep our current capitalist economic system is the neoclassical economic theory. According to neoclassical economics, wages should be determined by the supply and demand for labor in the market. In this theory, if there is high demand for a particular type of labor, the wages for that labor will naturally rise due to competition among employers for the available workers.
Therefore, the fact that trash collectors are paid well over the minimum wage is seen as a reflection of the demand for their services, and the willingness of employers to pay higher wages to attract and retain workers in this field. Neoclassical economics would argue that this is a natural and efficient outcome of market forces, and that government intervention in the form of minimum wage laws or other labor regulations could interfere with the functioning of the market and lead to unintended consequences.
Option B: REQUIRED RESPONSE ESSAY 2: 1200 words: A) In your own words, summarize the findings and implications of both studies of offender recidivism and how prisons arguably contribute to the problem (that is, contribute to high recidivism). Quote directly from at least 3 different assigned readings (and properly cite them). [THE TWO STUDIES YOU SHOULD USE ARE: "Recid of Prisoners 2005 in 30 States" and "Recidivism of Released Prisoners in 1994-1", both located in Canvas]. I've also attached these studies to this message.
Recidivism is among the most crucial concepts in criminal justice. When someone participates in criminal conduct after getting punishment or going through an intervention for a past violation, it is referred to as relapsing into criminal activity.
What impact does criminal recidivism have on the judicial system?This is known as recidivism, which is the continuing of criminal behavior after serving jail time for a prior offense. It may be used to determine someone's propensity for crime, as well as how frequently they are detained or found guilty.
The highest recidivism rates are among those who are arrested for the first offense before turning 18 years old. The lowest rates, which usually stay around 30%, were seen in those who were first arrested at age 40 or older. Recidivism rates decrease as persons become older, regardless of the age of the original arrest.
The majority of young men who were repeat offenders had not completed high school. They typically had inconsistent work histories before entering jail, and they were more likely to have been raised by relatives than by their biological parents. Both race and the amount of time spent incarcerated had no bearing on recidivism.
Unfortunately, some people will revert to their former criminal behaviors. It is understood by the term "recidivism" to refer to criminal activity that continues after a person has completed jail time for a prior offense. It may be a good indicator of someone's propensity for crime, as well as how frequently they are detained or found guilty.
It means that after receiving punishment for their crime, the offender picks up where they left off. He starts to act improperly on a regular basis. For instance, a man who had committed murder was given a prison term for it, and after serving it, he was let out of jail just to commit murder once more.
Two-thirds of those who were imprisoned in the previous three years will be detained once more, according to studies. Repeat criminals, their families, and the victims of their harm suffer as a result of recidivism.
Programs for earning a college degree and a high school diploma are the main subjects of initiatives based on education in prison. Additionally, it is possible to provide vocational training. Prisoners who participate in these educational programs will be better equipped to give back to society after their release.
Learn more about Recidivism: https://brainly.com/question/30641383
#SPJ1
4. All places have features that give them an identity or personality. In
2007 UNESCO added the Stone Forest to the World Heritage List as a
special place. What features or characteristics give the Stone Forest its
special identity? How will the World Heritage designation help the
Stone Forest? Provide details from the passage to support your answer.
The Stone Forest, a natural landscape in China, has unique features and characteristics that give it a special identity. According to the passage, the Stone Forest is a collection of limestone formations that resemble a forest of stone pillars or spikes. These formations are the result of millions of years of erosion and weathering, and they create a stunning and otherworldly landscape. Additionally, the Stone Forest is home to a variety of plant and animal species that are adapted to the unique environment.
The World Heritage designation will help to preserve the Stone Forest and promote its cultural and natural value. According to the passage, the designation was granted by UNESCO in 2007, which recognized the Stone Forest as a "masterpiece of human creative genius" and a "natural site of outstanding universal value." This designation will bring attention to the Stone Forest and its unique characteristics, and it will help to ensure that the site is protected and managed in a sustainable way. Additionally, the designation will promote tourism to the area, which can bring economic benefits to the local community while also raising awareness about the need to protect this special place.
Overall, the Stone Forest's unique limestone formations and diverse ecosystem give it a special identity, and the World Heritage designation will help to preserve and promote its cultural and natural value.
One result of the United States' involvement in World War I was that it allowed the country to
Answer: One result of the United States' involvement in World War I was that it allowed the country to emerge as a leading economic power.
Explanation: The war provided a boost to American industry and agriculture, as the country supplied goods and food to the Allies. This led to an increase in exports, and the US became a major creditor nation as European countries borrowed money to finance their war efforts.
The existentialist Soren Kierkegaard asks if there is something we are willing to live or die for. That question tells us how seriously he considers how we are to value our lives. We can simply settle on an ordinary existence, or we can set about finding a rich and meaningful one. Kierkegaard in the end found meaning in religion. Not formal religion, but a leap to find God in his own way. Another existentialist, Jean Paul Sartre, rejected religion but agreed with Kierkegaard as to the value of our choice of life. Both philosophers offer good ideas to think about as we end the course. To see the value of both answer the following questions:
Question:
Kierkegaard explains his three lifestyles. What does he say?
From the commentary in the chapter, why does Kierkegaard emphasize choice?
What is his famous "leap"?
An atheist, what is Sartre's view of God and religion as quoted in the reading?
What is the value of choice for Sartre?
What does the author of the text mean when he says,
Kierkegaard and Sartre "reveal another possibility"?
Kierkegaard's famous "leap" refers to the act of making a leap of faith towards God. He argues that true religious faith requires a leap of faith beyond reason and understanding.
Kierkegaard explains his three lifestyles as the aesthetic, ethical, and religious lifestyles. The aesthetic lifestyle is characterized by a focus on pleasure and personal satisfaction. The ethical lifestyle involves a sense of duty and responsibility towards others. The religious lifestyle involves a personal relationship with God and a commitment to living according to religious principles.
Kierkegaard emphasizes choice because he believes that our choices determine the meaning and value of our lives. He argues that we must make a conscious and deliberate choice to live a meaningful life, rather than simply drifting through life without purpose.
Kierkegaard's famous "leap" refers to the act of making a leap of faith towards God. He argues that true religious faith requires a leap of faith beyond reason and understanding.
Sartre rejects the idea of God and formal religion, arguing that human beings are free to create their own values and meaning in life. He famously declared that "God does not exist, and we must therefore create our own values."
The value of choice for Sartre lies in the fact that it is the fundamental basis of human freedom. He argues that because we are not predetermined by any external force or destiny, we are free to create our own lives and values.
When the author says that Kierkegaard and Sartre "reveal another possibility," he means that they offer an alternative perspective on the meaning and value of life. Rather than accepting a pre-determined path or relying on external authority, they suggest that we have the power to create our own lives and to find meaning and value through our choices.
In glimpses of the devil by M. Scott peck can you explain because story?
Answer: yes
Explanation:
Reflect on these words from the First Lady Grace Coolidge. What do they say about the role of the First Lady? United States and she took precedence
The words from First Lady Grace Coolidge suggest that the role of the First Lady is to support the President and the nation in a variety of ways.
What do they say about the role of the First Lady?The First Lady is expnected to use her platform to promote social causes and to represent the United States at official events and functtions. Additionally, the First Lady is expected to support the President's agenda and to serve as a symbol of natioonal unity and pride.
By saying that "the First Lady is, and always has been, an unpaid public servant elected by one person," Coolidge highlights the unique position of the First Lady.
Read more on first lady here: https://brainly.com/question/30413677
#SPJ1
What was one contribution made by the South African leader Nelson Mandela?
Group of answer choices
a He supported apartheid to improve the economy in South Africa.
b As president, he worked for reconciliation between South Africans.
c As prime minister, he investigated human rights abuses in South Africa.
d He was the first black African archbishop in Cape Town.
Answer: B I think
Explanation:
Based on the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, how could states avoid a repeat of what happened in Florida in the 2000 presidential election? A. Submit all election results to the Supreme Court to review. B. Establish a uniform standard to judge voter intent in a recount.
States could avoid a repeat of what happened in Florida in the 2000 presidential election by Establishing a uniform standard to judge voter intent in a recount. Option B
States could avoid a repeat of what happened in Florida in the 2000 presidential election by creating a common criteria to determine voter intent in a recount, based on the Supreme Court's judgment in Bush v. Gore.
States should adopt a standardized approach for determining voter intent in a recount to guarantee that all votes are handled equally and the election outcome is determined fairly and transparently.
Learn more about presidential election at https://brainly.com/question/29545203
#SPJ1
Question 8 of 10
Someone who is applying for a loan from a bank can expect the bank to:
OA. demand that the person close all of his or her accounts at
competing banks.
OB. investigate the person's parents to see if they were financially
responsible.
OC. check the person's credit history to make sure he or she pays
debts on time.
OD. request proof that the person has graduated from a good college.
SUBMIT
Answer:
Check the person's credit history
different between microeconomics and macroeconomics.
Individual markets are the emphasis of microeconomics, whereas entire economies are the subject of macroeconomics.
Scale is the primary distinction between microeconomics and macroeconomics. Microeconomics examines how particular households and businesses choose how to distribute their limited resources. Saying that microeconomics is the study of markets is another way to put this.
On the other hand, macroeconomics examines all aspects of the economy, including growth, inflation, and unemployment. The study of economies at the local, national, and international levels is known as macroeconomics.
This important distinction modifies how the two view economic circumstances. Microeconomics does take into account how global macroeconomic factors affect society, but it concentrates on how those forces affect specific businesses and industries. Microeconomists are interested in particular businesses or industries, while macroeconomists focus on the economy as a whole.
To learn more about microeconomics and macroeconomics, refer:
brainly.com/question/28489802
People in East Pakistan wanted independence from the rest of Pakistan because they
Group of answer choices
thought they had too little say in Pakistan’s government.
were mostly Hindu, and the rest of Pakistan was mostly Muslim.
were mostly Muslim, and the rest of Pakistan was mostly Hindu.
wanted to become part of India
East Pakistan wanted to declare independence from West Pakistan because of the following reasons;
A religious difference in West Pakistan tried to force its language on East Pakistan most of the wealth was concentrated in West Pakistan the nations were separated by more than 1000 miles. the struggle for Bengali rights started after Pakistan gained independence as a country with two contiguous territories known as West Pakistan.
we are people of the world we should be equal with everyone we should not create any conflict with any country we should be like a fraternity. there should be coordination with each country.
to know more details about east pakistan;
https://brainly.in/question/44323170
the earth supports life and helps all living beings to survive. do you support your family members when they need you? give examples
Firstly, financial support is one of the ways that family members can help each other. For example, parents can support their children by paying for their education or providing financial assistance during difficult times. Similarly, adult children can help support their elderly parents by providing financial assistance for medical expenses or daily living expenses.
Secondly, emotional support is also crucial for family members during difficult times. Family members can offer each other a listening ear, words of encouragement, or a shoulder to cry on. For instance, siblings can support each other through difficult times such as breakups, job loss, or illness by providing emotional support and being there for each other.
In summary, supporting family members is an important aspect of maintaining strong family relationships. Whether it's financial or emotional support, helping each other in times of need can strengthen family bonds and help everyone thrive.
There are many things happening on this graph, but you only need to focus on the green stuff. What conclusion can you draw from the green data?
Question 8 options:
No sunspots were observed during the middle ages (Years 1100-1600)
Sunspot data from the middle ages is much more detailed than sunspot data from 1700-1900.
Sunspot data from 1700-1900 is much more detailed than sunspot data from the middle ages.
Every person who collected this data is still alive
this is earth science
After observing the graph, we can conclude that, sunspot data from 1700-1900 is much more detailed than sunspot data from the middle ages.
History of Sunspot:
Sunspots have been observed by humans for thousands of years and are linked to solar activity. The Chinese made the first written record of sunspots in 800 B.C. English monk John of Worcester drew the first image of sunspots in 1128, and after the invention of the telescope, astronomers were able to make more detailed observations.
In 1843, German astronomer Samuel Schwabe discovered the sunspot cycle, which lasts about 11 years. Sunspots not only have a connection to geomagnetic activity on Earth but also play a role in climate change. A period called the Maunder Minimum from 1645 to 1715, with few sunspots, corresponded to a series of exceptionally cold winters throughout Europe known as the Little Ice Age.
Conversely, the Medieval Maximum from 1100 to 1250 had higher levels of sunspots and associated solar activity and coincided with a period of warmer climates on Earth known as the Medieval Warm Period. Currently, sunspot counts have been higher than usual since around 1900, which some scientists call the Modern Maximum.
Know more about Sunspots here:
https://brainly.com/question/30526692
#SPJ1
