The man rose from his stool at a workbench strewn with violin pieces and woodworking tools. Beneath his apron, he wore a starched white
shirt and a necktie.
"I called yesterday about having my violin appraised." He said nothing. "I have it here," I said, offering it like a gift to royalty.
His eyes passed over my violin, met mine, and then went back to the violin.
"So you want me to tell you what the violin is worth?" he said not looking up. I nodded, thinking that we had established that yesterday. My
eyes scanned the walls where hung probably fifty violins in a variety of sizes. I noted the glass case with the locks. Those had to be the quality
instruments. "Tell me what you know of this violin."
I told him that it had been my grandfather's, that he had brought it to this country from Italy, that he had supported his family playing for
country dances in Vermont.
The man set the violin down on a towel, breathed deeply. "So is this country dance fiddle for sale?"
Which is the best analysis of the craftsman?
O 1. His professional attitude identifies him as the protagonist.
O 2. His curiosity over the violin identifies him as the protagonist.
Ο Ο Ο Ο
3. His disregard for the violin identifies him as the antagonist.
O 4. His inappropriate dress identifies him as the antagonist.

Answer:

C : fore shadowing - a portend of dark things to come

1. Coffee tastes good & tea tastes like vomit

2. Coffee tastes good & tea tastes like vomit

3. Coffee tastes good & tea tastes like vomit

Answer:

Option: C "Monologue"

Explanation:Hoped This Helped And Here Is Proof Of This Answer And While Im At It Here Are The Rest Of The Answers!!

Answer:

They were surprised that they were attacked while being unarmed.

Explanation:

Louie and his friends were adrift in a lifeboat in the middle of the passive ocean. They had no weapons and were completely harmless to any army that could see them. For this reason, they were so surprised when they were attacked by the US air force when they asked for help, as they posed no threat to the Americans.

Answer:

in a school auditorium

Explanation:

I’d go with the second one personally but this is on you :))

Explanation:

Answer:Reset the table and try to get fortune 3 on diamond pick

Explanation:

Answer:

A song is sang by her.

Answer:

Stories are recognizable patterns, and in those patterns we find meaning. We use stories to make sense of our world and to share that understanding with others.

Answer:

obama

Explanation:

Barack Hussein Obama.....

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!

Answer:

Mr. Ben was depicted as an adventurous man, who did not listen to warnings.

Explanation:

In "The Hike", by Drew Magary, the main character, Ben was a business man who left his wife Teresa and three children to go on a trip to Philadelphia. There, he decided to go on a hike even after he was told that there was no path or trail for people to go on a hike by the woman who managed the hotel.

His insistence resulted in a troublesome adventure where he encountered so many weird incidents like the dog-faced men who killed people. He met his former school mate who disappeared in the morning and an old woman named Mrs. Blackwell who promised to lead him to Courtshire. In summary, it was a very scary adventure that caused him to get lost in the path.

In “The Hike” written by Drew Magary, the narrator depicts the character of Mr. Arseno as a fun and easy-going guy. He is also described as an adventurous guy, but he never listened to any warnings.

“The Hike” written by Drew Magary

The answer is further explained as given below:

• The main character Ben was an adventurous person, who left behind his life to go on a hike. He was also a little careless, as he did not listen to the warning given to him that there was no path for hiking, in the area which he was headed to.

• After not listening to the warnings, Ben had a lot of weird incidents happen to him and he faced a lot of things in his path, and he also lost his path due to it.

Therefore, the correct answer is that the narrator describes Mr. Arseno as a fun-loving guy who could be a little careless sometimes.

Learn more about depiction of characters by authors here:

https://brainly.com/question/9762811

Answer:

i would be able to attend the party

Answer:

to appeal a different audience

to teach a new lesson

to introduce a new theme

to modernize a story

Explanation:

An author writes an adaptation of a literary text because-

A work of literature that is designed to educate or convey a story like a novel or a book. It is used for expressive purposes as a text and conveys political statements or ideologies.

A literary text helps the author write a story in a creative manner which helps in introducing new themes into writing. This will help to modernize the story according to the taste and concept.

The adaptation of a literary text helps to make an appeal to different audiences which will help in better engagement with the subject of the theme.

Therefore, options A, B, C, and E are appropriate.

Learn more about a literary text, here:

https://brainly.com/question/22980149

#SPJ5

The meaning of "just so" in line two is d, ideal

Answer:

False?

Explanation:

　　°　　　•　　.°•　　　 ✯

　　　★　*　　　　　°　　　　 　°·　　                          

.　　　•　° ★　•  ☄

▁▂▃▄▅▆▇▇▆▅▄▃▁▂

Answer:

True, but she feared Poseidon as she was raped by him

Hope this helps!

Please no one share codes, it ruins learning for others.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

She washed the dishes and played the piano.

Answer:

She washed the dishes AND played the piano

Answer:

did she close the window after entering

Answer:

present simple: Does she close the window after entering?

past simple: Did she close the window after entering?

I wasn't sure if you wanted the present or the past form, so I put both, I hope this answers your question.

Answer:

it exsplicitly describes that boats are docked ( the third option)

Answer: MOST RELEVANT

admissible

applicable

compatible

consistent

germane

important

pertinent

proper

related

significant

suitable

suited

accordant

ad rem

allowable

applicatory

apposite

appurtenant

apt

becoming

cognate

concerning

conformant

conforming

congruent

congruous

consonant

correlated

correspondent

fit

fitting

harmonious

having direct bearing on

having to do with

material

on the button

on the nose

pat

pertaining to

pointful

referring

relative

to the point

weighty

Explanation:

Answer:

pertinent, applicable, germane, suitable, and apropos

Answer:

the horses ran across the field when practicing for the race

Answer:

The conger eel incident revealed that Jim Tom's and Jimmy Tom's perspective of the reef are very different. Although Jimmy was scared, he was more worried about saving the shell he found than saving himself. Jimmy Tom thinks that he deserved all of the treasures he found and that  he "asks no favors from the reef." In reality, Jimmy Tom is taking too much from the reef. Jim Tom proves this by saying that he thinks that if you are too greedy the reef protects itself. He told Jimmy Tom that he should be grateful for the treasures he has and not be greedy and put himself in danger by trying to get more. He believes that Jimmy Tom should be satisfied because he had a good reward. In conclusion, Jim Tom believes that the reef gifts you its beauty while Jimmy Tom thinks that if you find something in nature its yours.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. my mom (subject)

put (predicate)

2. king (subject)

sat (predicate)

3. children (subject)

learn (predicate)

4. we (subject)

looked (predicate)

5. grandma (subject)

uses (predicate)

I'm realyl really about that

Answer:

no i am not nnnnnnnnnooooooo

Answer:

number of people have written to me about their unwanted, obsessive thoughts after I published my article on obsessive compulsive disorder  some time ago, titled Those

Of particular note have been people who wrote about their fear that they “might be gay” because 1) they have a thought, “I might be gay," 2) they believe that it would be terrible if they were gay, and 3) having a thought is a sign that you are gay.

Now, certainly if someone is gay, it is an important period of growth and courage to recognize that this is the case and to embrace one’s true identity. Not to sound like a cliché, but there is nothing “wrong” with being gay, and there is something dehumanizing in rejecting one’s true identity. However, the people who are writing to me indicate that their sexual history is heterosexual, they do not feel aroused by gay fantasies, and that they are troubled by these thoughts. So I thought I would address some of these issues here.

Here is how obsessive people think of their thoughts (from my book, Anxiety Free):

People who suffer from OCD have certain characteristic ways of evaluating their own obsessive thoughts. These often take the form of false beliefs that not only distort reality, but strengthen the obsessions. I have listed below problematic ways of thinking about your thoughts and some possible realistic and helpful ways of challenging your intolerance of these thoughts. See if any of this fits you.

My thoughts are abnormal. The things that go through my head are totally weird. Other people don’t have thoughts like this. There must be something wrong with me.

The obsessive person believes that the thought, “I might be gay," is unusual, weird, and unique to him or her. But isn’t it possible that anyone can have this thought? What is so “wrong” or “weird” about having a thought? What if you normalized any thought as acceptable?

My thoughts are dangerous. Imagining a certain reality could make it come true. If I can’t control or eliminate the images in my mind, there will be terrible consequences. The more I think about bad things happening, the more likely it is that they’ll happen.

The obsessive believes that they must rid their mind of the “unwanted thought” that they are gay lest it come true and they unravel, lose control, and experience terrible consequences. This is a form of “thought-action fusion” where you believe that your thoughts and images will become reality. Of course, you can have the thought that there are white bears dancing in the waiting room but, if you look, there will be no white bears.

I can control my thoughts. If I keep bad thoughts from entering my mind, they can’t exert power over me. I can influence the kind of thoughts I have through effort and willpower. Giving my thoughts free rein is too dangerous to be an option.

This is a form of “pure mind” thinking where you believe that you need to rid your mind of any unwanted thoughts. But the mind is a noisy place, filled with lots of information—most of it irrelevant. Moreover, the more you try to suppress the thought about white bears, the more likely you will have these thoughts.

Explanation:

plz mark me as brilliant plz plz plz plz plz plz

Answer:

Billy Budd, Sailor

Explanation:

Billy Budd, Sailor is a novella by American writer Herman Melville left unfinished at Melville's death in 1891. Acclaimed by critics as a masterpiece when a hastily transcribed version was finally published in 1924

Answer:

Hypothetical.

The type of evidence that Orwell uses in this passage is known as Hypothetical evidence. Thus, the correct option for this question is D.

Hypothetical evidence may be defined as a type of evidence in a story that describes about what would happen if your thesis were true. A story to go with a statistic from a good source. An imaginary event that would trigger an action related to your thesis.

This type of evidence governs a potential instance or example that might illustrate your claim in action. These types of evidence may be unrealistically thought or assumed in a story prior to actually happening. It involves or is based on a suggested idea or theory. According to Orwell, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.

Therefore, the type of evidence that Orwell uses in this passage is known as Hypothetical evidence. Thus, the correct option for this question is D.

To learn more about Hypothetical evidence, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/875167

#SPJ5

Your question seems incomplete. The most probable complete question is as follows:

What type of evidence does Orwell use in the passage to support the claim that "political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible"?

Explanation:

World War II caused greater destruction than any other war in history. The war took the lives of about 17 million soldiers and an even greater number of civilians, who died as a result of bombings, starvation, and deliberate campaigns of mass murder. The war also ushered in the atomic age and was quickly followed by the collapse of the wartime alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union and the beginning of the Cold War.

World War I created the conditions that led to World War II. The peace settlement ending the war, which stripped the Central Powers of territory and arms and required them to pay reparations, left lasting bitterness in Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Turkey. The peace treaty also disappointed two of the victors, Italy and Japan. In addition, the war severely disrupted Europe's economies and helped set the stage for the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Answer:

First person POV because the author is writing about themselves (auto = self)