Answer: I am say it's probably B The emergence of Manifest Destiny
Answer:
b
Explanation:
ILL GIVE BRAINLIST!!!!
Why is the first amendment the most important amendment in the Bill of Rights? Why?
Please write 3-5 sentences!
Answer:
Arguably, the First Amendment is also the most important to the maintenance of a democratic government. It states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The freedoms of speech, press, assembly and the right to petition the government and seek redress of grievances proclaim that citizens have the right to call the government to account. Freedom of speech and press allows citizens to communicate their ideas verbally and in writing, while freedom of assembly lets them publicly express a common interest. The right to petition allows citizens to point out to the government where it did not follow the law, to seek changes, as well as damages for such missteps.
The first amendment basically states all the rights a US citizen has.
“Government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.”
—Ronald Reagan, inaugural address, 1981
Based on the quote, what best reflects Ronald Reagan’s political views?
Answer:
Ronald Reagan believed in a free market/laissez-faire policy and was against goverment regulation/interventention. We see this in his advocacy for tax cuts and his strong position against communism.
What does ""self-determination"" mean for Farmer and Carmichael and Hamilton?
Answer:
The answer of this question is,
Explanation:
Self determination for farmers, carmichael and hamilton is that type of determination which are taken by the farmers for their own profit or income.
Need help with this question!!!
Write a three-paragraph memo to someone at the U.S. State Department presenting your position on how to solve the world poverty problem. Support your position with solid reasoning, facts and a well-stated argument. Arguments should be based on fact and not involve value judgments.
Just give 3 points to write the paragraphs on. WILL AWARD BRAINLIEST
Answer:
he only way to eliminate poverty is to eliminate the human right that states that everyone has a right to choose whether to attend school or not. I think this is the best solution to eliminate poverty
Explanation:
1. Healthcare is one of the most important factors that needs to be improved if we want to escape poverty. If everyone is sick and dying they won't be able to go to school or do work, and will remain in the cycle of poverty. They won't be able to get educated, they can't go to work and earn money, and they can't do anything to better their standard of living.
2. Sanitation is also super important along with healthcare. With proper sanitation, people wouldn't be getting sick all the time, and there will be better environments for people to work or go to school. People will have the chance to escape poverty faster if only they had good healthcare and proper sanitation + hygiene.
3. Education is the most important thing after healthcare. If people are uneducated, they won't know how to help themselves escape poverty. And without education, they can't get good jobs with sustainable wages. Once the person has education, they will be able to work at a decent job.
These are just my starting points for you. You will have to add facts and reasons yourself. If you can think of anything else that you think adds to the cycle of poverty, feel free to write about it. (Example, you can write about weak government, few natural resources, poor infrastructure, etc.)
Knowing which direction is east, west, north, or south on a map is
If the 14 amendments guaranteed citizenship, why do you think the 15th was necessary?
How did citizens take part in the running of their polis?
Answer:
done
Explanation:
If people wanted to move into a polis, they would need a citizenship. There were two types of democracy, direct democracy and representative democracy. Direct democracy is when citizens take part in the every day affairs of the government.
Pls help! Thx!!
The protestant reformation lead to different religions such as Lutheran, Baptist, Presbyterian, and Methodist. What did these different religions lead to?
Answer:
war
Explanation:
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
Goals of Social Policy
Offenng social welfare
programs
Protecting
disadvantaged
children
?
A. Sending financial aid to unstable countries
B. Providing access to education
C. Increasing gross domestic product
D. Reducing unemployment
Answer:
the answer is B providing access to education
Explanation:
I just did the test
Answer:
Providing access to education.
Explanation:
Which island is further east Cuba or Puerto Rico
Answer:
cuba
Explanation:
Cuba is further West. Puerto Rico is further East. So it is Puerto Rico.
Reflection (5-7 complete sentences): Why do you think it is important for us to learn about the Holocaust?
PLZ HELP!!!!
Why didn’t Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia align with the US or USSR? What advantages did that give them?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.
Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia didn't align with the US or USSR because they were firm believers in the foreign policy of neutrality. They had no special ties or preferences for the Soviet Union or the United States.
The advantage that this gave them was to remain neutral in the face of conflict, which they thought was positive to bring peace to the region during the Cold War years.
These two countries were part of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) that played a key role during the Cold War Years to help bring peace and stabilization
The NAM organization started in 1955 due to the Asia-Africa Conference of Bandung, Indonesia, to the initiative of Asian and African countries such as India, Pakistan, Burma, Indonesia, Ghana, and Ceylon.
What did the Supreme Court rule in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden?
A. Only the federal government had the right to control interstate commerce.
B. States had power over the national government in matters involving taxation.
C. A state could not tax a national bank.
D. A state had the right to control its own commerce.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Only the federal government had the right to control interstate commerce.
Explanation:
This case began because New York gave one man a monopoly over the Hudson River, which runs through more than just NY. The case ended up in The Supreme Court with John Marshall as Chief Justice. In the constitution, it stated that the federal government had power over the state government. This meant that the states could not do anything to override the federal government. So, in the end, it was decided that only the federal government could control trade between or across states.
15. What were Herbert Hoover's attitude/actions toward the Great
Depression? How did he feel government should handle it?
Herbert Hoover had a very relaxed attitude towards the great depression. He believed that it would go away with time. He also thought that instead of government programs to help people, such as welfare, charities and churches should be taking care of people, not the government. Essentially he didn't think the government should be handling it. Over time, it became obvious that charities and churches could not help the millions of people in need that were starving and homeless. He enacted a few government programs but by then it was too late. The depression had lasted far too long, and people were done with him. He lost his reelection to Franklin Roosevelt.
Do you think the Sedition Acts violated first amendment rights? Why or why not?
Answer:
The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. ... Both argued that the federal government did not have the authority to enact laws not specified in the constitution.
Explanation:
The Court took this opportunity to officially declare the Sedition Act of 1798, which had expired over 150 years earlier, unconstitutional: “the Act, because of the restraint it imposed upon criticism of government and public officials, was inconsistent with the First AmendmentThomas Cooper, a lawyer and newspaper editor in Sunbury, Pennsylvania, was indicted, prosecuted, and convicted of violating the Sedition Act after he published a broadside that was sharply critical of President Adams.The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. ... Both argued that the federal government did not have the authority to enact laws not specified in the constitution
Why would a unanimous decision on the Linda Brown case "carry more weight than a divided one?
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional. Brown v. Board of Education was one of the cornerstones of the civil rights movement, and helped establish the precedent that “separate-but-equal” education and other services were not, in fact, equal at all.
Separate But Equal Doctrine
In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that racially segregated public facilities were legal, so long as the facilities for Black people and whites were equal.
The ruling constitutionally sanctioned laws barring African Americans from sharing the same buses, schools and other public facilities as whites—known as “Jim Crow” laws—and established the “separate but equal” doctrine that would stand for the next six decades.
But by the early 1950s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was working hard to challenge segregation laws in public schools, and had filed lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs in states such as South Carolina, Virginia and Delaware.
In the case that would become most famous, a plaintiff named Oliver Brown filed a class-action suit against the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, in 1951, after his daughter, Linda Brown, was denied entrance to Topeka’s all-white elementary schools.
In his lawsuit, Brown claimed that schools for Black children were not equal to the white schools, and that segregation violated the so-called “equal protection clause” of the 14th Amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
The case went before the U.S. District Court in Kansas, which agreed that public school segregation had a “detrimental effect upon the colored children” and contributed to “a sense of inferiority,” but still upheld the “separate but equal” doctrine.
READ MORE: The Family That Fought School Segregation 8 Years Before Brown v. Board of Ed
Brown v. Board of Education Verdict
When Brown’s case and four other cases related to school segregation first came before the Supreme Court in 1952, the Court combined them into a single case under the name Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Thurgood Marshall, the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs. (Thirteen years later, President Lyndon B. Johnson would appoint Marshall as the first Black Supreme Court justice.)
At first, the justices were divided on how to rule on school segregation, with Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson holding the opinion that the Plessy verdict should stand. But in September 1953, before Brown v. Board of Education was to be heard, Vinson died, and President Dwight D. Eisenhower replaced him with Earl Warren, then governor of California.
Displaying considerable political skill and determination, the new chief justice succeeded in engineering a unanimous verdict against school segregation the following year.
In the decision, issued on May 17, 1954, Warren wrote that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place,” as segregated schools are “inherently unequal.” As a result, the Court ruled that the plaintiffs were being “deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.”
Little Rock Nine
In its verdict, the Supreme Court did not specify how exactly schools should be integrated, but asked for further arguments about it.
In May 1955, the Court issued a second opinion in the case (known as Brown v. Board of Education II), which remanded future desegregation cases to lower federal courts and directed district courts and school boards to proceed with desegregation “with all deliberate speed.”
Though well intentioned, the Court’s actions effectively opened the door to local judicial and political evasion of desegregation. While Kansas and some other states acted in accordance with the verdict, many school and local officials in the South defied it.
In one major example, Governor Orval Faubus of Arkansas called out the state National Guard to prevent Black students from attending high school in Little Rock in 1957. After a tense standoff, President Eisenhower deployed federal troops, and nine students—known as the “Little Rock Nine”—were able to enter Central High School under armed guard.
READ MORE: Why Eisenhower Sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock After Brown v. Board
Impact of Brown v. Board of Education
Though the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board didn’t achieve school desegregation on its own, the ruling (and the steadfast resistance to it across the South) fueled the nascent civil rights movement in the United States.
Should the president be able to suspend certain liberties of citizens during war time?
Answer:
In my personal opinion, yes. Now, many people may not agree with this, but I believe that the president should be able to suspend certain liberties during war time due to the looming threat of an enemy nation and spies. For example, the freedom of speech should be limited during war time in order to prevent the leakage of information to enemy spies. I, myself would rather trade some of our liberties in exchange for better protection of my country and the people.
Explanation:
Compare and contrast the actions of Nat Turner with the actions of John Brown.
Answer:John Brown was white man who was born and raised in a free state. Nat Turner was born into slavery. ... John Brown's father was strongly against slavery which resulted in himself being even more against slavery. When comparing the two, John Brown was a more effective abolitionist of slavery
Explanation:
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs
Match each step in the nitrogen cycle to its description
bacteria convert ammonia
to nitrites and nerates
bacteria convert atmospheric
narogen to ammonia
plants and animals take in
and use nitrogen compounds
bacteria break down waste
products and return nitrogen
to the so
bacteria convert nitrates
into nitrogen gas
denitrification
asimilation
ammonification
nitrification
nitrogen fixation
Use this link to find your answer
http://ldh.la.gov/
Answer:
Here is what I got for this one.
Explanation:
Hope it helps! :)
what is the short answer to this question
Answer: Explanation I agree
How were the Mauryan and Gupta Empires different?
A.
Unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages.
B.
Unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas established a central government that allowed local rule.
C.
Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans established a central government that allowed local rule.
D.
Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans encouraged construction of public works.
E.
Unlike the Guptas, the Mauryans encouraged the caste system to form a stable government.
The Mauryan and Gupta Empires were different in several ways. One of the differences between the Mauryan and Gupta Empires is that, unlike the Mauryans, the Guptas collected taxes from districts and villages. option A is correct.
Option B is incorrect because the Guptas didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; instead, they maintained a highly centralized government. Option C is also incorrect because the Mauryans didn't establish a central government that allowed local rule; rather, they maintained a centralized government.
Option D is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas encouraged the construction of public works. Option E is incorrect because both the Mauryans and Guptas relied on a stable government, but they had different ways of achieving it.The Mauryan Empire, which existed from about 322 BCE to 185 BCE, was an ancient Indian empire that was centralized.
The empire was established by Chandragupta Maurya, who defeated Alexander the Great's successors, the Seleucids. Emperor Ashoka was one of the most significant Mauryan emperors. The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire that existed from about 320 CE to 550 CE. The Guptas had a highly centralized administration, and their empire was more extensive than the Mauryans.
The correct option is A.
For more question The Mauryan
https://brainly.com/question/12001220
#SPJ8
How does Lin-Manuel Miranda's Hamilton embody the spirit of America then and now?
Answer:
Let me answer you...
Explanation:
Miranda began working on "Hamilton" in 2009. He was inspired to write a hip-hop musical about founding father Alexander Hamilton after reading the 2004 biography "Alexander Hamilton" by historian Ron Chernow. ... "It was, he thought, a hip-hop story, an immigrant's story."
In your own words, summarize the United States’ foreign relations policies and values throughout the course of World War I. Be sure to explain key ideas such as neutrality and isolationism in your answer.
In July 1914, when World War I started, the United States vigorously maintained its neutrality. President Woodrow Wilson urged the country as a whole to refrain from being personally or philosophically embroiled in the battle.
What do you know about World War I?One of the deadliest worldwide battles in history, World War I, often known as the First World War, lasted from July 28, 1914, to November 11, 1918. It was fought between two coalitions, the Allies (mainly France, the United Kingdom, Russia, Italy, Japan, and the United States) and the Central Powers (led by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire). Violence broke out in several countries of Asia,
the Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. 5 million people died as a result of military action, famine, and disease, while an estimated 9 million troops were killed in battle and another 23 million were injured. Genocide claimed millions more lives, and the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 was made worse by the movement of soldiers during the conflict.
Learn more about World War I, from :
brainly.com/question/925121
#SPJ2
A nonviolent Hindu protester for Indian independence was
1.Confucius.
2.Siddhartha Gautama.
3.Nelson Mandela.
4. Mohandas Gandhi. .
Mahatma Ghandi was a pacifist , he want a world of peace and diplomatic. He was born in 2 october 1869 in British Raj
How do special interest groups legally shape public policy?
A. by lobbying officials
B. by paying candidates
C. by enacting regulations
D. by passing tax cuts
Answer:
I guess it's (A) by lobbying officials.
Answer:
The answer is... by lobbying officials
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :D
Describe the qualities that made buffalo hard to hunt.
Answer:
Bison can run very quickly and have thick outer skin making them difficult to hunt
Explanation:
Answer:
When buffalo became confused, they often did not run. Buffalo hunters took advantage of this and could kill many at a time because they stood still
Explanation: took the test
What was the sectional interest of American settlers in the West?
A. Westerners wanted cheap land and good transportation.
B. Westerners wanted an alliance with Mexico to help control Native Americans,
C. Westerners wanted free land and government grants.
D. Westerners wanted gold as their currency.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Why did the Greeks resort to trickery in order to conquer Troy?
I need help with this
i this it should be a true
