The most logical action for Saudi Arabians who agree with the professor would be to learn to speak English.
This is because the professor highlights the importance of the country being part of the global world, and one of the main languages of the global world is English.
In order to effectively communicate and connect with other countries, it is essential to have a common language. By learning to speak English, Saudi Arabians can better understand the changes seeping through their lives and have the ability to communicate with other nations.
Additionally, learning English can also bring economic benefits to Saudi Arabia. English is widely used in international business, and proficiency in the language can lead to increased trade and investment opportunities. English is also the language of science, technology, and innovation, and having a population that is fluent in English can attract foreign investors and spur economic growth.
While studying their nation's history and traveling to neighboring countries can also be important actions, learning to speak English provides a more direct and practical way of engaging with the global world. Understanding the English language is a key tool for success in the interconnected world of today, and by embracing this language, Saudi Arabians can better navigate the changes and opportunities that come with it.
To learn more about Saudi Arabians refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14253996
#SPJ11
In one paragraph, explain how the results of the Kansas-Nebraska Act were different from earlier compromises over slavery. PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!!
Answer:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed. While the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 came about due to the debate over the expansion of slavery into new territories, the Kansas-Nebraska Act focused on the economic future of western states.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Which of the following conclusions is supported by the text?
1.Nuclear power is the most efficient kind of energy for powering cities.
2.Professional athletes should study the science of energy to play better.
3.Dams power cities by converting stored potential energy into kinetic energy.
4.Drought is a serious problem for farmers in the American Southwest.
The text referenced is "Everyday Energy" by Edward I. Maxwell. The conclusions that is supported by the text is;"Nuclear power is the most efficient kind of energy for powering cities." (Option A)
What is a conclusion in literature?The conclusion paragraph should start by restating your argument, then extend out to a wider topic. Finally, make a closing statement. This paragraph follows the same pattern as your opening paragraph, progressing from specialized to generic.
The conclusion's role is to physically conclude... or to tie things up so the reader has a feeling of closure. It achieves this by stepping back from the minutiae to see the overall picture of the paper. In other words, it serves to remind the reader of the essential point.
Learn more about literature:
https://brainly.com/question/28188697
#SPJ1
Can someone type an essay about berlin,korea,and cuba: how did U.S contain communism?
When did many asian and african colonial people begin to challenge european colonial rule for independence?.
Answer: Between 1945 and 1960
Explanation:
Three dozen new states in Asia and Africa achieved autonomy or outright independence from their european colonial rulers. There was no process of decolonization. In some areas, it was peaceful, and orderly.
over time more and more people in western european nations wanted to break away from which of the following
People in Western European countries become more dissatisfied with colonialism and monarchial authority throughout time.
What exactly is a monarchial rule?A monarchy is a political system in which a single person has complete sovereignty or power.
The term refers to states in which the monarch, an individual ruler who acts as the head of state and is chosen by hereditary procedures, has supreme authority.
The United Kingdom is a monarchy with ceremonial powers for the king. Another case in point is Saudi Arabia, where the monarch wields absolute power.
Learn more about monarchial Rule:
https://brainly.com/question/15557719
#SPJ1
What contributation did AL-Khwarizmi make to the world of mathematics
Al-Khwarizmi's main contribution to mathematics was the development of algebra and the introduction of the decimal positional number system.
Al-Khwarizmi, a Persian mathematician, made significant contributions to the world of mathematics. He is known as the "Father of Algebra" due to his groundbreaking work on the subject, as he wrote the first book on algebra, "Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wal-Muqabala."
This work laid the foundation for modern algebra and provided a systematic approach to solving linear and quadratic equations. In addition to algebra, Al-Khwarizmi played a crucial role in introducing the decimal positional number system, which is widely used today.
He was also responsible for spreading the use of Hindu-Arabic numerals in the Western world. These innovations have greatly influenced the fields of mathematics, science, and engineering over the centuries.
To know more about quadratic equations click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30098550#
#SPJ11
Agreeing to be a Sonderkommando guaranteed a Jewish inmate’s survival through the Holocaust. Group of answer choices
False
True
after the war, propaganda such as that employed by the image was used to help justify which of the following policies? responses the pursuit of more open international trade the pursuit of more open international trade the expansion of compulsory education the expansion of compulsory education literacy requirements for voting rights literacy requirements for voting rights red scare prosecutions
Propaganda is a form of communication that aims to shape people's beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. It is often used by governments, political groups, and other organizations to promote particular ideas, policies, or ideologies.
Propaganda can be used to justify a wide range of policies and actions, depending on the goals and values of the group using it. For example, propaganda might be used to:
Promote military recruitment and support for war
Demonize political opponents and minority groups
Encourage compliance with government policies and regulations
Promote economic growth and development
Shape public opinion on social and cultural issues
Ultimately, the impact of propaganda depends on a variety of factors, including the medium used, the target audience, and the cultural and political context in which it is received.
To know more about propaganda here
https://brainly.com/question/25836020
#SPJ4
A major goal of the hutu-led regime in rwanda in mid-1994 was to.
The major goal of the Hutu-led regime in Rwanda in mid-1994 was to eliminate the Tutsi ethnic group and consolidate their power over the country.
In 1994, Rwanda was engulfed in a horrific genocide that resulted in the deaths of an estimated 800,000 people, mostly from the Tutsi ethnic group. The genocide was carried out by the Hutu-led government and militias, who had long resented the Tutsi minority for their perceived wealth and privilege.
The Hutu-led regime's primary goal during the genocide was to eliminate the Tutsi ethnic group and consolidate their power over the country. They used a combination of propaganda, violence, and intimidation to mobilize the Hutu population against the Tutsi, portraying them as a dangerous enemy that needed to be eradicated.
To know more about Rwanda , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29766839
#SPJ4
Public domain
Use the graph and your knowledge of U.S. history to answer the question. Which of these explains the differences in Union vs. Confederate firearm production during the Civil War? (5 points)
To know more about Civil War, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
Answer:
The North's heavy industrialization provided an advantage.
Explanation:
Why were american citizens so anxious or fearful during the years of the cold war?
a. American citizens were afraid that that soviet union might engage the united states in a nuclear was.
b. Having seen the devastation that came out of the Great Depression, Americanâs feared the impact of the Soviet economy.
c. American citizens did not trust the nature of communism, and were afraid the United States would adopt a communist government.
d. The leaders of the United States worked hard to make citizens afraid of communism so that they would accept capitalism
Answer:
I believe it’s A, but it might also be D.
Explanation:
The Soviet Union had tested H-bombs which means that they could destroy the U.S. This meant that we were very worried that the U.S.S.R. might engage the U.S. in a nuclear war. For that reason, it’s probably A. However, U.S. leaders did utilize propaganda to make its citizens afraid of communism, so it could be D, but I would go with A.
Answer: A. American citizens were afraid that that soviet union might engage the united states in a nuclear war.
Explanation:
I took the test and that was the correct answer.
Where did German communists take their orders from?
Answer:
German communists took their orders from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). The CPSU was the ruling party of the Soviet Union and it had a great deal of influence over communist parties around the world. The CPSU provided financial and logistical support to communist parties in other countries, and it also issued directives on how they should operate. German communists were expected to follow the CPSU's lead, and they were often punished if they did not.
The CPSU's influence over German communists was particularly strong during the Cold War. The Soviet Union was seen as the leader of the communist world, and German communists were expected to toe the party line. The CPSU's influence began to decline after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and it has been virtually nonexistent since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
What made the battle at Antietam and Gettysburg different from the other battles
Despite just lasting three days, the Battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest in American history. On the other hand, the Battle of Antietam was the bloodiest day in American history, with 22,717 persons being reported as either dead, missing, or injured.
What made the Battle of Gettysburg unique compared to other battles?Union and Confederate forces clashed in and around the Pennsylvanian town of Gettysburg on July 1-3, 1863, during the American Civil War. The fighting, which is frequently considered to have been the war's turning point, claimed the most lives overall.
What made the Battle of Antietam unique compared to prior battles?The Union army in the Eastern theater was capable of holding itself back from the Confederate army thanks to Antietam, the bloodiest day of combat in American military history. Also, it provided Lincoln the self-assurance he required so that he could deliver the first Emancipation Proclamation when he was in control rather than when he was in a desperate position.
Learn more about Emancipation Proclamation: https://brainly.com/question/29788953
#SPJ1
Despite the end of the cold war, many people still worry about new threats to world peace and security. What are these threats? how has the international community dealt with them?.
how does castiglione define the renaissance man in the courtier
Answer:well-rounded, skilled in the art of war, and be a superior athlete.
Explanation:
by christmas 1914, what three areas had armies moved into?
for any two objects, which of the following is affected by the objects mass and the distance between them
Answer:
The gravitational force between the two objects is affected by both the mass of the objects and the distance between them. The force of gravity decreases with distance and increases with the mass of the objects. This relationship is described by Newton's law of universal gravitation.
Answer:
Gravity is affected by the size of an object and the distance between the objects. When the mass of an object increases the force of gravity increases as well.
Explanation:
the answer is gravity
Which best explains why the abolitionist movement grew stronger as a result of the Scott v. Sandford ruling?
a. Only Scott should be free.
b. The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.
c. The children of the Scotts would be free.
d. Only Scott’s wife should be free
The abolitionist movement grew stronger as a result of the Scott v. Sandford ruling was explained by b. The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.
African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be considered American citizens and, as a result, could not file a claim for their freedom in federal courts, according to the U.S. Supreme Court's famous Scott v. Sandford decision, popularly known as the Dred Scott case, which was made in 1857. The abolitionist movement, which had been fighting to abolish slavery in the United States, was dealt a devastating setback by this ruling.
It demonstrated how the Supreme Court disregarded African Americans' fundamental human rights and upheld the system of slavery. Although the decision sparked outrage among abolitionists and received widespread criticism, it did not advance their cause. Instead, it strengthened pro-slavery defenders and made it more challenging for abolitionists to succeed.
Read more about Scott v. Sandford on:
https://brainly.com/question/13656974
#SPJ4
On the debate Harvard, junior touched on the issue of solving civic social issues either by violence or civil disobedience. Which of these two methods or ways would you choose? Give an example using current affair in South Africa of why would you choose it and of why you think it's better than others. I need 2 pages please
The choice between violence and civil disobedience to solve social issues is a complex one that should be considered carefully. In South Africa, civil disobedience has been used to challenge the status quo and bring about positive change. It is a method that respects human rights and can lead to a more inclusive and democratic society.
Regarding the debate on solving civic social issues, it is important to consider the context and specific circumstances of each case. Violence and civil disobedience are two opposing methods that have been used throughout history to achieve social change.
Violence is characterized by the use of force and aggression towards individuals or groups that oppose certain ideals or beliefs. On the other hand, civil disobedience is a peaceful way to protest and challenge the status quo by breaking the law in a nonviolent way.
In South Africa, there have been many instances of both violence and civil disobedience to fight against social issues such as racism and inequality. One current example is the protests against the arrest of former president Jacob Zuma.
Some protestors have resorted to violent methods, such as looting and damaging property, while others have chosen civil disobedience by organizing peaceful marches and sit-ins.
Although violence can sometimes bring about immediate change, it often leads to more violence and harm to innocent people. In contrast, civil disobedience can be more effective in the long run by raising awareness and putting pressure on the government to address social issues.
In my opinion, civil disobedience is a better method to solve social issues because it is a peaceful way to bring about change and it shows respect for human rights. It also creates a dialogue and can lead to a more inclusive and democratic society.
However, it is important to note that civil disobedience should be used responsibly and not put people's safety at risk.
In conclusion, the choice between violence and civil disobedience to solve social issues is a complex one that should be considered carefully. In South Africa, civil disobedience has been used to challenge the status quo and bring about positive change. It is a method that respects human rights and can lead to a more inclusive and democratic society.
To know more about civil disobedience refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9330788#
#SPJ11
What was the ultimate fate of Osama bin Laden following his terrorist organization's attacks on America?
The reason behind Osama's assault on America was his conviction that a staggering strike on American soil would persuade the U.S. to pull out from the Muslim world. Osama went against the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia and Somalia and looked to drive our country's staff out of these areas forcibly.
The unlawful utilization of power or brutality against individuals or property with the thing of scaring or pressuring an administration, the overall people, or any subset thereof, to advance political or social objectives.
Terrorism's main objective is to sabotage individuals' sense that everything is good in the areas they are generally acquainted with. Critical targets can likewise have structures or different spots that act as huge political or financial images, like government offices or military stations.
Learn more about Terrorism:
https://brainly.com/question/885090
#SPJ4
Why would the white people who burned Greenwood down not want the event in textbooks?
Answer: The Greenwood massacre, also known as the Tulsa race massacre, was a violent and tragic event that occurred in 1921 in Greenwood, a prosperous African American community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. During the massacre, a white mob destroyed the entire community, burning down homes, businesses, and churches and killing an estimated 300 Black people.
There could be several reasons why some white people who were responsible for the massacre or who may have supported it would not want the event to be included in textbooks:
Guilt or shame: Some individuals may not want the event to be included in textbooks because they feel ashamed or guilty about what happened. They may not want to be associated with such a horrific event, or they may fear backlash or criticism from others.
Desire to maintain power and control: Some individuals or groups may not want the event to be included in textbooks because it could challenge their power and control over the narrative of history. Acknowledging the massacre would mean recognizing the atrocities committed against the Black community and would challenge the dominant narrative that portrays white people as the heroes of American history.
Efforts to minimize or deny the event: Some individuals or groups may want to minimize or deny the event altogether because it does not align with their worldview or political agenda. They may believe that acknowledging the event would undermine their beliefs or political positions, or they may simply not believe that the event occurred or was as severe as reported.
Overall, the reasons why some white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event to be included in textbooks are likely complex and multifaceted, involving personal, cultural, and political factors.
Explanation:
Answer:
they wanted to cover up their atrocities, escape justice, and preserve their racial and economic privilege.
Explanation:
the Tulsa race massacre was a two-day-long massacre that took place between May 31 and June 1, 1921, when mobs of white residents, some of whom had been appointed as deputies and armed by city government officials, attacked Black residents and destroyed homes and businesses of the Greenwood District in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The event remains one of the worst incidents of racial violence in U.S. history, and, for a period, remained one of the least-known: News reports were largely squelched, despite the fact that hundreds of people were killed and thousands left homeless.
One possible reason why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks is that they wanted to erase the evidence of their crimes and avoid accountability for their actions. For decades, there was no public recognition or official investigation of the massacre. The local newspapers that had covered the story were removed from archives or destroyed. The survivors and their descendants were silenced by fear, intimidation, and legal threats. The state and city governments did not acknowledge or compensate the victims for their losses. The history of Greenwood and its prosperous Black community was largely forgotten or distorted.Another possible reason why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks is that they wanted to maintain their racial supremacy and economic dominance over the Black population. One factor that drove the violence was resentment toward the Black prosperity found in block after block of Greenwood, which was home to what was known as America’s Black Wall Street. The white mob looted and burned down hundreds of businesses, including grocery stores, hotels, nightclubs, theaters, doctor’s offices, and churches. They also killed hundreds of residents and drove thousands out of their homes. By destroying Greenwood, they eliminated a source of competition and inspiration for Black people across the nation. They also prevented the accumulation and transmission of generational wealth that could have shaped and secured the fortunes of Black children and grandchildren.
Therefore, some possible reasons why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks are that they wanted to cover up their atrocities, escape justice, and preserve their racial and economic privilege.
The relationship between Native Americans, American Citizens, and the US Government
( FLVS )
Answer:American Indians and Alaska Natives have the same rights as all citizens to hold public office. In this century, American Indian and Alaska Native men and women have held elected and appointed offices at all levels of state, local, and federal government.
Explanation:
Who is the mongol conqueror of much of asia and parts of europe. he lived from 1162 until 1227?
Answer: Genghis Khan
Explanation:
The Mongol conqueror of much of Asia and parts of Europe who lived from 1162 until 1227 is Genghis Khan. He is considered one of the most successful military commanders in history and is credited with founding the Mongol Empire, which at its peak stretched from Asia to Europe.
The Mongol conqueror of much of Asia and parts of Europe who lived from 1162 until 1227 is Genghis Khan.
Genghis Khan was the founder and first emperor of the Mongol Empire, which at its height, stretched from Eastern Europe to the Sea of Japan. He was born as Temujin in the harsh steppes of Mongolia and grew up as a warrior. He united many Mongol tribes and conquered much of Central Asia, including China, before his death in 1227.
Genghis Khan was known for his military tactics, which were based on speed, mobility, and surprise, as well as his cruelty towards his enemies. He also implemented administrative and legal reforms that helped to govern the vast territories of his empire. His legacy as a conqueror and leader is still felt today in the cultures and societies of many of the regions he conquered.
Learn more about Genghis Khan: https://brainly.com/question/22796812
#SPJ11
Which event is best supported by the belief expressed in John O'Sullivan's quote?
a. Xyz affair
b. War of 1812
c. Texas annexation
d. Election of andrew jackson
John O'Sullivan's quote "The great American experiment of liberty and democratic government demands expansion" best supports the event of Texas annexation.
The correct option is C.
This quote expresses the belief that the United States should expand its boundaries, and this belief was used to justify the annexation of Texas in 1845. The Texas annexation was an important event in US history, as it precipitated the Mexican-American War, greatly expanded the size of the United States, and helped to spread the ideals of democracy and liberty.
The War of 1812 and the election of Andrew Jackson do not have any direct connection to expansion, so they are not supported by the belief expressed in the quote.
The correct option is C.
To know more about John O'Sullivan, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1778097
#SPJ4
Which state does not have a river that is connected to the mississippi river?
if anyone answers correct, i will vote branliest!!
a) arkansas
b) illinois
c) kentucky
d) missouri
Illinois does not have a river that is connected to the mississippi river
Which state does not have a river that is connected to the mississippi river?Illinois is the state that does not have a river directly connected to the Mississippi River.
Illinois is situated along the eastern bank of the Mississippi River, and it is home to the city of Cairo, where the Ohio River converges with the Mississippi. While Illinois has several significant rivers, such as the Illinois River and the Wabash River, they are not directly connected to the Mississippi River.
Read more on Mississippi River https://brainly.com/question/7999616
#SPJ1
"Tournament Winner" by Luke See. In which way does the reader learn the most about the character Charles Bradford?
In "Tournament Winner" by Luke See, the reader learns the most about Charles Bradford through his thoughts and actions during the chess tournament.
In the story, Charles Bradford's thoughts and actions reveal his character traits, such as determination, intelligence, and strategy. As he progresses through the chess tournament, we see him analyzing his opponents, making strategic moves, and reflecting on his past experiences.
These insights provide a deep understanding of his personality and motivations. Furthermore, his interactions with other characters also help in developing his character, as they shed light on his relationships and how he is perceived by others.
By observing Charles Bradford's thoughts and actions, the reader gains a comprehensive understanding of his character, ultimately contributing to the story's depth and overall message.
To know more about character traits click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/15229018#
#SPJ11
main reason why drum beats were effectively used at dawn
What was true about the British approach to colonialism?
Option C. Britain wanted colonists to know how to govern themselves is the most accurate statement about the British approach to colonialism.
What informs the Britain's approach?The British approach to colonialism was characterized by the belief that the colonists would eventually be able to govern themselves under the guidance and supervision of the British.
The British encouraged the use of the local language in favor of English and they did not encourage settlers to speak their mother tongue.
Therefore, option C. Britain wanted colonists to know how to govern themselves is the most accurate statement about the British approach to colonialism.
learn more about colonialism: https://brainly.com/question/8048490
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP
(who ever answers all gets brainliest)
1-Describe two facts about Abraham Lincoln’s background that likely influenced or biased his point of view.
2-Describe two facts about Jefferson Davis’s background that likely influenced or biased his point of view.
3-Supporters of the Union looked to Article VI of the Constitution for support for their argument. Read the excerpt from Article VI and then choose and defend a point of view regarding whether the Constitution corroborates (supports) a view that the Union is permanent.
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. "
Two facts about Jefferson Davis's background that likely influenced or biased his point of view are his upbringing in the South and his military experience. Born in Kentucky and raised in Mississippi, Davis was exposed to Southern culture and values, which included support for states' rights and the institution of slavery.
This regional upbringing likely shaped his perspective on the supremacy of the Constitution and federal laws.
Additionally, his military experience, both at West Point and during the Mexican-American War, might have reinforced his belief in strong central authority while also emphasizing the importance of individual states' rights in the context of the overall nation.
These two aspects of his background contributed to the development of his views on the relationship between the federal government and individual states.
To know more about slavery, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/9331183#
#SPJ11
Answer: Abraham Lincoln was against slavery and wanted to do whatever he could to end it. A reason for this is because he believed that slavery was morally wrong and that Black people should have the same rights as white people with him saying "All me are created equal," said Lincoln. These thoughts of his would eventually get him killed after the Emancipation Proclamation was put into law he was killed almost three months later.
Explanation: gotchu
Which idea was embraced by fascists in europe during the 1920s an
The idea that was embraced by fascists in Europe during the 1920s was the concept of totalitarianism, nationalism, and the belief in a strong central government led by a single authoritarian leader.
The idea of nationalism and the importance of a strong, centralized state were the key tenets embraced by fascists in Europe during the 1920s. This ideology was used to justify their aggressive and expansionist foreign policies, as well as their oppressive tactics at home.
Totalitarianism refers to a political system in which the government exercises complete control over all aspects of society, including the economy, culture, and individual rights. Fascists believed that this level of control was necessary to create a unified and strong nation.
Nationalism, another key component of fascism, is a political ideology that emphasizes the importance of shared cultural and historical identity, and the belief that one's nation is superior to others. Fascists believed that the success of their nation required the suppression of minority groups and the promotion of the majority's interests.
Lastly, fascists in Europe during the 1920s believed in the necessity of a strong central government led by a single authoritarian leader, often referred to as a dictator. This leader was expected to make swift and decisive decisions for the betterment of the nation, bypassing traditional democratic processes.
In summary, the idea embraced by fascists in Europe during the 1920s was a combination of totalitarianism, nationalism, and the belief in a strong central government led by a single authoritarian leader. These principles allowed fascists to justify their aggressive actions, control their societies, and promote their nationalistic agenda.
To know more about fascists refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/461379#
#SPJ11
