Please Help!



For Ln=1n∑ni=1i−1n , given Ln as indicated, express their limits as n→[infinity] as definite integrals, identifying the correct intervals

None of the given expressions (A, B, C, D, E) are equal to 45 x 67.

To find which expressions are equal to 45 x 67, we simply need to simplify each of the expressions given.

Therefore, none of the expressions are equal to 45 x 67.

Learn more about expressions

brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen contestant has a brown beard and is only in the beard competition is 0.402. The correct answer is option (D) 0.402.

Let B denote the event that a contestant has a brown beard, and M denote the event that a contestant is only in the beard competition. We are given:

P(B) = 0.406

P(M) = 0.509

P(B U M) = 0.513

We want to find P(B ∩ M), the probability that a contestant has a brown beard and is only in the beard competition. We can use the formula:

P(B U M) = P(B) + P(M) - P(B ∩ M)

Rearranging and substituting the given values, we get:

P(B ∩ M) = P(B) + P(M) - P(B U M)

= 0.406 + 0.509 - 0.513

= 0.402

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen contestant has a brown beard and is only in the beard competition is 0.402.

Read more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

See full text below

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1

Trevor was the lucky journalist assigned to cover the Best Beard Competition. He recorded the contestants' beard colors in his notepad. Trevor also noted the contestants were signed up for the mustache competition later in the day.

The probability that a contestant has a brown beard is 0.406, the probability that a contestant is only in the beard competition is 0.509, and the probability that a contestant has a brown beard or is only in the beard competition is 0.513.

What is the probability that a randomly chosen contestant has a brown beard and is only in the beard competition?

0.915

0.582

0.004

0.402

O 0.103

O 0.441

Answer:

$450

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use the variables C, I, and F to represent the number of chocolate fudge bars, ice cream sandwiches, and frozen fruit bars, respectively, that you will sell.

The cost of each chocolate fudge bar is $0.75, the cost of each ice cream sandwich is $0.85, and the cost of each frozen fruit bar is $0.50. Therefore, the total cost of the frozen treats that you buy will be:

Total cost = 0.75C + 0.85I + 0.50F

We want to make sure that this total cost is no more than $450. Therefore, we can write the following inequality:

0.75C + 0.85I + 0.50F ≤ 450

This inequality represents the number of chocolate fudge bars, C, the number of ice-cream sandwiches, I, and the number of frozen fruit bars, F, that will cost you no more than $450.

The t critical value at 29 degrees of freedom and 0.01 level of significance is 2. 46

Using Critical value calculator we calculate the values.

a) at n = 10

Therefore degrees of freedom is = n - 1= 9, So therefore at 9 degrees of freedom and 0.01 level of significance, t critical value is 2.82

b) at n= 20

Degrees of freedom is 19.

The t critical value at 19 degrees of freedom and 0.01 level of significance is 2.54

c) at n = 30

Degrees of freedom is 29.

So therefore t critical value at 29 degrees of freedom and 0.01 level of significance is 2. 46

Learn more about significance level on

https://brainly.com/question/30400745

#SPJ4

The values of the sequence defined by the formula aₙ = crⁿ⁻¹ - d are c = 7, r = 2, and d = 7.

A sequence is defined as an arrangement of numbers in a particular order.

Given aₙ = crⁿ⁻¹ - d, then;

c - d = 0...(1)

cr - d = 7...(2)

cr² - d = 21...(3)

from equal (1), c = d so that equation (2) becomes;

cr - c = 7 and;

c = 7/(r - 1)...(4)

put 7/(r - 1) for c and d in equation (3);

7/(r - 1)(r²) - 7/(r - 1) = 21

7r² - 7 = 21(r - 1)

7r² - 21r + 14 = 0

r² - 3r + 2 = 0

by factorization;

r = 1 or r = 2

denominator in equation (4) will be zero if r = 1, so we put 2 for r in equation (4) to get c;

c = 7/(2- 1)

c = 7.

Therefore, values of the sequence defined by the formula aₙ = crⁿ⁻¹ - d are c = 7, r = 2, and d = 7.

Read more about sequence here:https://brainly.com/question/7882626

#SPJ1

Answer:

3456 [tex]m^{2}[/tex]

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

A square pyramid is comprised of a square and four triangles.

The square has an area of 1296 m ( 36m × 36m ) ( length × width ).

A triangle has an area of 540 m ( [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] × 36m × 30m ) ( [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] × width × ( slant ) height ).

The total surface area would be 1296 m + 4 × ( 540 m ) : ( Multiply 4 because there are 4 triangles ).

The total surface area is 3456 [tex]m^{2}[/tex].

Answer: 3,456 m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula is SA = 2bs + b^2.

SA = 2 (36) (30) + 36^2

= 72 (30) + 1,296

= 2,160 + 1,296

= 3,456 m^2

The average depth of the Indian Ocean is 3.7 time greater than that of Arctic Ocean. Therefore, the correct option is A.

To find how many times as great the average depth of the Indian Ocean is compared to the Arctic Ocean, we need to divide the average depth of the Indian Ocean by the average depth of the Arctic Ocean.

1: Divide the average depth of the Indian Ocean by the average depth of the Arctic Ocean:

3900 meters (Indian Ocean) / 1050 meters (Arctic Ocean) = 3.7142857

2: Round the result to the nearest tenth:

3.7

So, the average depth of the Indian Ocean is approximately 3.7 times greater than the average depth of the Arctic Ocean. The correct answer is A. 3.7.

Learn more about Average depth:

https://brainly.com/question/30169419

#SPJ11

Answer:  D.  7/15 or

Step-by-step explanation:

You have 15 possible outcomes

Probability= possibilities/outcomes

Possible numbers that are multiples of 3 are: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15.  There are 5 possibilities.

P(multiple of 3) = 5/15

Possible numbers that are multiples of 7 are: 7, 14, .  There are  2 possibilities.

P(7) = 2/15

Because of the or you add th e probabilities

P(multiple of 3 or multiple of 7) = 5/15 +2/15 =7/15

D

Answer: is approximately between 113.39 and 116.61
To calculate the 95% confidence interval for the students' average IQ score, we'll use the given information: sample size (n=150), sample mean (X=115), and sample standard deviation (s=10). We'll use the t-distribution since the population standard deviation is unknown.

First, we need to find the t-value for a 95% confidence interval with n-1 (149) degrees of freedom. Using a t-table or calculator, we find the t-value to be approximately 1.976.

Next, we'll calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula: SE = s/√n. In this case, SE = 10/√150 ≈ 0.816.

Now, we can find the margin of error (ME) using the formula: ME = t-value × SE. For this problem, ME = 1.976 × 0.816 ≈ 1.61.

Finally, to calculate the 95% confidence interval, we'll use the formula: X ± ME. Thus, the 95% confidence interval is 115 ± 1.61, which is approximately (113.39, 116.61).

So, the 95% confidence interval for the students' average IQ score is approximately between 113.39 and 116.61.

To know more about confidence interval:

https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ11

The correct equation that gives the population, a(x), of the town x years since 2005 is:

a(x) = 12,500 * (1 + 0.054)ˣ

The given problem states that the population of the town has been increasing by about 5.4% per year since 2005. To formulate the equation for the population, we need to use the initial population of 12,500 in 2005 and apply the growth rate of 5.4% per year.

The general formula for exponential growth is:

a(x) = a(0) * (1 + r)ˣ

Where:

a(x) is the population at a given time x years since the initial time,

a(0) is the initial population (12,500 in this case),

r is the growth rate (5.4% or 0.054 as a decimal),

x is the number of years since the initial time (2005 in this case).

Plugging in the values, we get:

a(x) = 12,500 * (1 + 0.054)ˣ

This equation calculates the population of the town x years since 2005.

Learn more about population

brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11

The total cost to transport 12 tons of sugar is $8,600. The equation relating the total cost (c) to the amount of sugar transported (s) is: c = 175s + 6500

To find the total cost to transport 12 tons of sugar, we substitute s = 12 into the equation: c = 175(12) + 6500, c = 2100 + 6500, c = 8600

Therefore, the total cost to transport 12 tons of sugar is $8,600.

The equation shows that the total cost increases by $175 for each additional ton of sugar transported, and there is also a fixed cost of $6,500 for renting the trucks, which is added to the variable cost.

To know more about variable & fixed cost, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14560343#

#SPJ11

A) The null hypothesis (H0) is that there has been no change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there has been a change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census

B) At a 95% confidence level, the critical value for a two-tailed test is ±1.96.

A) The null hypothesis (H0) is that there has been no change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census, i.e., the current prevalence of HIV is still 7.5%. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there has been a change in the prevalence of HIV since the last census, i.e., the current prevalence of HIV is different from 7.5%.

B) To test the hypothesis, we can use a z-test for proportions. The test statistic can be calculated as:

z = (p - p0) / [tex]\sqrt{(p0(1-p0)/n)}[/tex]

where p is the sample proportion of HIV positive cases, p0 is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis, and n is the sample size.

In this case, p = 468 / 4706 = 0.099, p0 = 0.075, and n = 4706. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

z = (0.099 - 0.075) / [tex]\sqrt{0.075(1-0.075)/4706}[/tex] = 8.80

At a 95% confidence level, the critical value for a two-tailed test is ±1.96. Since the calculated z-value (8.80) is much larger than the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is strong evidence to suggest that the prevalence of HIV has changed since the last census. In other words, the prevalence of HIV is different from 7.5%.

To learn more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

The nearest year, we can estimate that the number of new cases would reach 1282 in the year 2017.

To find the linear regression equation, we need to use the formula:

y = a + bx

where y is the number of new cases, x is the number of years since 1995, a is the y-intercept and b is the slope of the line.

Using the given data, we can find the values of a and b using the formulas:

b = (nΣxy - ΣxΣy) / (nΣ[tex]x^2[/tex] - (Σx)[tex]^2)[/tex]

a = (Σy - bΣx) / n

where n is the number of data points, Σxy is the sum of the products of x and y, Σx is the sum of x, Σy is the sum of y, and Σ[tex]x^2[/tex] is the sum of squares of x.

Using these formulas and the given data, we get:

n = 9

Σx = 36

Σy = 7386

Σx^2 = 162

Σxy = 3330

b = (93330 - 367386) / (9*162 - 36^2) ≈ -75.44

a = (7386 - (-75.44)*36) / 9 ≈ 2612.67

Therefore, the linear regression equation is:

y ≈ 2612.67 - 75.44x

To estimate the year in which the number of new cases would reach 1282, we can substitute y = 1282 into the equation and solve for x:

1282 ≈ 2612.67 - 75.44x

75.44x ≈ 2612.67 - 1282

x ≈ 22.36

This means that the number of new cases would reach 1282 approximately 22.36 years after 1995. Adding this to 1995 gives us an estimate of the calendar year:

1995 + 22.36 ≈ 2017.36

Rounding to the nearest year, we can estimate that the number of new cases would reach 1282 in the year 2017.

Learn more about table.

brainly.com/question/10670417

#SPJ11

1/20 of the customers are dairy intolerant.

We know that 1/5 of the customers are vegetarian, and 3/4 eat meat. Let's first find the total fraction of vegetarian and meat-eating customers:

1/5 (vegetarian) + 3/4 (meat)

To add these fractions, we need a common denominator. The least common denominator (LCD) for 5 and 4 is 20. So, we'll convert both fractions to have the same denominator:

(1/5)*(4/4) = 4/20 (vegetarian)
(3/4)*(5/5) = 15/20 (meat)

Now, let's add the fractions:

4/20 (vegetarian) + 15/20 (meat) = 19/20 (vegetarian and meat)

Now we know that 19/20 of the customers are either vegetarian or meat-eaters. The remainder must be dairy intolerant. To find this fraction, subtract the combined fraction from 1:

1 - 19/20 = 1/20

So, 1/20 of the customers are dairy intolerant.

Learn more about fraction,

https://brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ11

The solution to the differential equation is f(a) = 1/√(12a⁴/125 - 769/5000).

To find f(a), we need to solve the differential equation:

dy/dx = 24yx³

Separating variables, we get:

dy/y³ = 24x³ dx

Integrating both sides, we get:

-1/(2y²) = 6x⁴ + C

where C is the constant of integration.

To find the value of C, we use the fact that the y-intercept of the curve y = f(2) is 5. This means that when x = 2, y = 5. Substituting these values into the equation above, we get:

-1/(2(5)²) = 6(2)⁴ + C

Simplifying and solving for C, we get:

C = -1/(2(5)²) - 6(2)⁴

C = -769/125

So the solution to the differential equation is:

-1/(2y²) = 6x⁴ - 769/125

Solving for y, we get:

y = 1/√(12x⁴/125 - 769/5000)

Therefore, f(a) = 1/√(12a⁴/125 - 769/5000).

Learn more about derivatives.

brainly.com/question/2289064

#SPJ11

The interest gained by Lesli is if she lends $5000 for 3 years at 5% simple interest annually is $750, 10% simple interest annually is $1500, and on 5% compound interest annually is $790

The simple interest is calculated by

I = P * r * t

where P is the principal

r is the rate of interest

t is the time

I is the simple interest

The compound interest is calculated by:

I = P[tex](1 +r)^t[/tex] - P

where I is the compound interest

P is the principal

r is the rate of interest

t is the time

According to the question,

P = $5000

t = 3 years

1. r = 5% simple interest

I = 5000 * 3 * 0.05

= $750

2. r = 10% simple interest

I = 5000 * 3 * 0.10

= $1500

3. r = 5% compounded annually

I = 5000 [tex](1+0.05)^3[/tex] - 5000

= 5000 * 1.158 - 5000

= $790

Learn more about Compound Interest:

https://brainly.com/question/30364118

#SPJ4

The question is in Spanish, and the question in English is:

How much interest will Lesli earn if she lends 15,000 to be paid in 3 years? at: 5% annual simple. 10% simple annual. 5% compounded annually

The finance charge on a credit card account with a balance of $660.30 and an APR of 6.2% is $3.41.

To calculate the finance charge on a credit card account with a balance of $660.30 and an APR of 6.2%. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Convert the APR (Annual Percentage Rate) to a decimal by dividing it by 100: 6.2 / 100 = 0.062

2. Divide the APR decimal by 12 to find the monthly interest rate: 0.062 / 12 = 0.005167

3. Multiply the credit card balance by the monthly interest rate: $660.30 * 0.005167 = $3.41

The finance charge on a credit card account with a balance of $660.30 and an Annual Percentage Rate (APR) of 6.2% is determined to be $3.41. This finance charge represents the cost of borrowing on the credit card and is calculated based on the outstanding balance and the interest rate.

To know more about credit card account refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29823818

#SPJ11

The length of UT, to the nearest tenth, is approximately 10.5 inches.

How long is segment UT?

To find the length of UV, we can use the tangent-secant theorem, which states that the square of the length of the tangent segment (UV) is equal to the product of the lengths of the secant segments (RS and ST).

First, we need to find the length of RS + ST:

RS + ST = 8 in + 4 in = 12 in

Next, we can use the formula for the tangent-secant theorem:

[tex]UV^2 = RS * ST[/tex]

[tex]UV^2 = 8 in * 4 in[/tex]

[tex]UV^2 = 32 in^[/tex]

To find the length of UV, we take the square root of both sides:

[tex]UV = √32 in[/tex]

Calculating the square root, we get:

UV ≈ 5.7 in (rounded to the nearest tenth)

Therefore, the length of UV is approximately 5.7 inches.

Learn more about theorem

brainly.com/question/18868430

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

We Know

(5x - 6) + (8x + 17) must equal 180°

Find the value of x.

Let's solve

5x - 6 + 8x + 17 = 180

13x + 11 = 180

13x = 169

x = 13

So, the value of x is 13.

The students will need $74 on the third day.

Let x be the cost of one item at Store A and y be the cost of one item at Store B. Then the system of equations to model the situation is:

4x + 7y = 30
3x + 5y = 22

To find the cost on Day 3, we need to solve for x and y, and then use those values to calculate:

10x + 17y = ?

Part B: Solve the system of equations to find x and y
To solve the system of equations, we can use elimination or substitution. Here, we'll use substitution.

From the first equation, we can solve for x:

4x + 7y = 30
4x = 30 - 7y
x = (30 - 7y)/4

Substitute this expression for x into the second equation:

3x + 5y = 22
3((30 - 7y)/4) + 5y = 22
(90 - 21y)/4 + 5y = 22
90 - 21y + 20y = 88
-y = -2
y = 2

Now that we know y = 2, we can substitute this value back into either equation to find x:

4x + 7y = 30
4x + 7(2) = 30
4x + 14 = 30
4x = 16
x = 4

So x = 4 and y = 2.

Part C: Calculate the amount of money needed on Day 3
Finally, we can use these values to calculate the amount of money needed on Day 3:

10x + 17y = 10(4) + 17(2) = 40 + 34 = 74

Therefore, the students will need $74 on the third day.

To know more about system of equations refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12895249?#

#SPJ11

To find the probability of a contestant liking cats and dogs but not rabbits, we can use the formula for calculating the probability of independent events. That is, P(A and B and not C) = P(A) * P(B) * P(not C).

So in this case, P(cats and dogs and not rabbits) = 0.1 * 0.9 * 0.4 = 0.036. Therefore, the probability of a contestant liking cats and dogs but not rabbits is 0.036 or 3.6%.

As for the most likely outcome of this contestant's preferences, we can see that 90% of the contestants like cats, so it's very likely that this contestant likes cats. However, only 10% of the contestants like dogs, so it's less likely that this contestant likes dogs.

And 60% of the contestants like rabbits, so it's even more likely that this contestant does not like rabbits. Therefore, the most likely outcome is that this contestant likes cats but does not like dogs or rabbits.

In conclusion, given the probabilities provided, we can calculate the probability of a contestant liking cats and dogs but not rabbits, and we can also determine the most likely outcome of this contestant's preferences. The independence of the events allows us to use simple probability calculations to make these determinations.

To know more about probability refer here

https://brainly.in/question/34187875#

#SPJ11

The conclusion should be made using the Alpha = 0. 05 significance level is because the P-value is greater than Alpha = 0.05, there is not convincing evidence that greater than 75% of puppies are house-trained by the time they are 6 months old. The correct answer is B.

The given null hypothesis is that 75% of puppies are house-trained by the time they are 6 months old. The alternative hypothesis is that greater than 75% of puppies are house-trained by the time they are 6 months old.

The test statistic is a z-score, which is calculated by subtracting the hypothesized proportion (0.75) from the sample proportion (42/50 = 0.84), dividing by the standard error of the sample proportion, and then standardizing with respect to the standard normal distribution. The resulting z-score is 1.47.

The P-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the calculated z-score, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A P-value of 0.708 means that there is a 70.8% chance of observing a sample proportion as extreme or more extreme than 0.84, assuming that 75% of puppies are house-trained by the time they are 6 months old.

Since the P-value is greater than the significance level (alpha) of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. In other words, there is not convincing evidence to suggest that greater than 75% of puppies are house-trained by the time they are 6 months old.

Learn more about hypothesis at https://brainly.com/question/30461126

#SPJ11

the sequence 1, 4, 16, ... is a geometric sequence with a common ratio of 4.

what is geometric sequence ?

A geometric sequence is a sequence of numbers in which each term after the first is found by multiplying the previous term by a fixed number called the common ratio (r).

In the given question,

The sequence 1, 4, 16, ... is geometric.

To determine the common ratio, we divide any term by the previous term. For example:

The ratio between 4 and 1 is 4/1 = 4.

The ratio between 16 and 4 is 16/4 = 4.

Since the ratio is the same for any two consecutive terms, we can conclude that the common ratio is 4.

We can also verify this by using the general formula for a geometric sequence:

aₙ= a₁ * r⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾

where aₙ is the nth term, a_1 is the first term, r is the common ratio, and n is the term number.

Using the given sequence, we have:

a₁ = 1 (the first term)

a₂ = 4 (the second term)

a₃ = 16 (the third term)

We can use these values to solve for the common ratio:

a₂ / a₁ = r

4 / 1 = r

r = 4

Therefore, the sequence 1, 4, 16, ... is a geometric sequence with a common ratio of 4.

To know more about geometric sequence , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13008517

#SPJ1

Both the chess and checkers group have the same range.

The box plots range for the ages of club members in the chess and checkers group are given. Based on the box plots, it appears that both groups have similar ranges, and it is difficult to determine which group has a greater range.

The range is a measure of variability that indicates the difference between the smallest and largest values in a dataset. In the chess group, the smallest value is 18, and the largest value is 20, which gives a range of 2. In the checkers group, the smallest value is 10, and the largest value is 20, which also gives a range of 10.

Although the difference between the smallest and largest values in the checkers group is greater than that in the chess group, the box plots suggest that the checkers group has more outliers than the chess group. An outlier is a data point that is significantly different from other observations in a dataset. The presence of outliers can increase the range of a dataset.

Therefore, despite the larger difference between the smallest and largest values in the checkers group, the presence of outliers makes it difficult to determine which group has a greater range. Overall, the box plots show that both groups have similar ranges, but the checkers group has more variability in the form of outliers.

Learn more about range

brainly.com/question/28135761

#SPJ11

Caroline bought approximately 3.70 pounds of chicken breast.

Let's use algebra to solve the problem:

Let x be the number of pounds of chicken breast Caroline bought.

We know that 2.5 pounds of chicken breast cost $23.50, so we can set up the following proportion:

2.5 / $23.50 = x / $34.78

To solve for x, we can cross-multiply and simplify:

2.5 * $34.78 = x * $23.50

$86.95 = $23.50x

x = $86.95 / $23.50

x ≈ 3.70 pounds

Therefore, Caroline bought approximately 3.70 pounds of chicken breast.

To know more about proportion refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30657439

#SPJ11

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

Here are the steps that Frank took:

1/5t+2=17

1/5t+2-2=17

1/5t=17

t=85

Frank is incorrect.  He is incorrect because in step 2, he forgot to subtract both sides by 2, and only did this to the left side of the equal sign.  He has to subtract 2 from both sides of the equal side to have the equation remain balanced.  Frank should've gotten t=75.

Hope this helps! :)

The correct inequality to describe the problem is A. 10 + x > 15, which means that the total time Farid spends on the level (10 + x) must be greater than 15 minutes in order for him to lose a life.

To solve the inequality, we can start by isolating x on one side of the inequality:

10 + x > 15

Subtracting 10 from both sides, we get:

x > 5

This means that Farid can play for up to 5 more minutes on the level without losing a life, since spending a total of 10 + 5 = 15 minutes on the level would cause him to lose a life.

Therefore, the solution to the inequality is "Farid can play less than 5 more minutes on that level without losing a life."

Overall, the correct option is A. 10 + x > 15.

To learn more about inequality here

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ4

Answer:   C

Step-by-step explanation:

 Since from your original g(x) went to f(x) which is up 6

add 6 to g(x)

g(x)= f(x) +6

The area of the composite figure is approximately 2447.43 square millimeters to the nearest hundredth.

To find the area of the composite figure, we need to divide it into simpler shapes and then find their areas separately. The composite figure is made up of a rectangle and two semicircles.

First, let's find the area of the rectangle. The length of the rectangle is 55 mm and the width is 32.5 mm, so the area of the rectangle is:

[tex]$$A_{rect} = length \times width = 55 \text{ mm} \times 32.5 \text{ mm} = 1787.5 \text{ mm}^2$$[/tex]

Next, let's find the area of each semicircle. The diameter of each semicircle is equal to the width of the rectangle, which is 32.5 mm. Therefore, the radius of each semicircle is:

[tex]$$r =[/tex] [tex]\frac{32.5 \text{ mm}}{2} = 16.25 \text{ mm}$$[/tex]

The formula for the area of a semicircle is:

[tex]$$A_{semicircle} = \frac{1}{2} \pi r^2$$[/tex]

So, the area of each semicircle is:

[tex]$$A_{semicircle} = \frac{1}{2} \pi (16.25 \text{ mm})^2 \approx 329.97 \text{ mm}^2$$[/tex]

To find the total area of the composite figure, we add the area of the rectangle to the area of the two semicircles.

[tex]$$A_{total} = A_{rect} + 2 \times A_{semicircle} \approx 2447.43 \text{ mm}^2$$[/tex]

Therefore, the area of the composite figure is approximately 2447.43 square millimeters to the nearest hundredth.

To learn  more about composite figure refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/27234680

#SPJ11

-3.8 is the slope of the secant line connecting (1, f(1)) and (9, f(9)).

To get the slope of the secant line, we must first compute the values of f(1) and f(9):

f(1)

= 1² - 5(1)

= -4

f(9)

= 9² - 5(9)

= 36 - 45

= -9

The formula for the slope of the secant line running between these two locations is:

slope = (y-change)/(x-change)

= (f(9)-f(1))/(9-1)

Substituting f(1) and f(9) values and simplifying yields slope ,

= (-9-(-4))/(9-1)

= -5/8

= -0.625

When we round this to two decimal places, we get:

slope = -0.63

The slope of the secant line connecting (1, f(1)) and (9, f(9)) is thus -0.63.

To know more about slope of secant, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/14438198

#SPJ4