El Salvadorian political leader Oscar Romero was killed in 1980. The policies of Mikhail Gorbachev caused the Soviet Union's communism to fall. The standard of living in communism was frequently poor.
A Catholic priest named Oscar Romero became an activist in El Salvador, speaking out against oppression and brutality by the government. It was because he supported social justice and human rights that he was murdered in 1980. To modernise the political and economic system, Mikhail Gorbachev, the last General Secretary of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union, adopted the glasnost and perestroika policies.
This caused greater public criticism and eventually contributed to the fall of communism in 1991. The 1980s saw a variety of living situations under communism, including low living standards and political persecution, even as the state provided services like healthcare and education.
Learn more about Oscar Romero:
https://brainly.com/question/15653166
#SPJ4
Why was it argued that Imperialism would help get America out of this time of crisis?
Answer: because it would give the US an outlet to market overproduced goods in foreign countries.
Pls Help
Seeing as though the Cold War did not produce
active fighting between the U.S. and U.S.S.R., how
important do you think this war was to history? Why?
(Minimum of 3 sentences, 3pts
The Cold War was an incredibly important event in world history despite the fact that it did not produce active fighting between the United States and the Soviet Union.
The Cold War was a period of geopolitical tension and ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted from the end of World War II until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Although the Cold War did not result in direct military conflict between the two superpowers, it had far-reaching consequences for the world, including the arms race, proxy wars, and the division of the world into two spheres of influence.
The Cold War was important because it shaped the course of world events for over four decades. It led to the development of nuclear weapons and the arms race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which had a significant impact on global politics, economics, and society. The rivalry between the two superpowers also led to the division of the world into two spheres of influence, with the U.S. and its allies in the West, and the Soviet Union and its allies in the East.
To know more about Cold War, click here
https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ1
Why was King Philip II not successful in bringing England back to Catholicism when he married Mary Tudor?
King Philip II of Spain married Mary Tudor, the Queen of England, in 1554 with the aim of bringing England back to Catholicism. However, despite his efforts, he was not successful in his mission for a number of reasons.
Opposition from English Nobles: Many English nobles were opposed to the marriage, and feared that it would lead to a loss of English sovereignty to Spain. They also feared that Philip would try to impose Catholicism on the country, which was deeply unpopular with the majority of the English population.
Popular Resistance: Many ordinary English people were deeply committed to Protestantism, and were resistant to attempts to reintroduce Catholicism. This was especially true in the towns and cities, where Protestantism was strongest.
Mary's Death: Mary Tudor died in 1558, just four years after the marriage, and was succeeded by her half-sister Elizabeth I, who was a Protestant. Elizabeth reversed many of Mary's Catholic policies, and introduced a new Act of Supremacy which made her the head of the Church of England. This meant that even if Philip had succeeded in reintroducing Catholicism during Mary's reign, it would have been short-lived.
Political Instability: England was facing a period of political instability during the reign of Mary Tudor, with many Catholic and Protestant factions vying for power. This made it difficult for Philip to implement any lasting changes.
Overall, King Philip II's attempts to bring England back to Catholicism were thwarted by political, social, and religious factors that made it difficult for him to impose his will on the English people.
20. Which quality of the Hudson River School art is displayed in this painting? (1 point)
A. A portrayal of man's relationship with nature
B. A portrayal of vivid landscapes in the Northeast
C. A portrayal of industrialization's effect on nature
D. A portrayal of the European influence on American artists
A portrayal of man's relationship with nature quality of the Hudson River School art is displayed in this painting. So the option A is correct.
The Hudson River School was a nineteenth-century American art trend. It was distinguished by its Romantic emphasis on the natural world and its adoration of the American environment.
This painting of a Native American guy in the middle of a lush, tranquil setting is a prime example of the artwork produced by this school. The landscape and the guy look to be at peace with one another, demonstrating the man's harmony with the natural world.
The image exudes reverence for nature and suggests a strong bond between people and the natural world. The painting also conveys the message that nature should be cherished and valued and that man is a part of it. So the option A is correct.
To learn more about Hudson River link is here
brainly.com/question/29836492
#SPJ4
Do you believe that congressional members should be elected by popular vote? why or why not? use an example from the lesson to support your opinion. your answer should be at least one hundred and fifty words.
Yes, I believe that congressional members should be elected by popular vote.
In a democratic society, it is important for the people to have a say in who represents them in government. The current system of allowing state legislatures to choose senators and having districts drawn in a way that favors one political party over another (gerrymandering) can lead to a lack of representation and political polarization.
For example, in the lesson we learned about the case of North Carolina's congressional districts being redrawn to favor Republican candidates, leading to an imbalance in representation. This shows how the current system can be manipulated for political gain, rather than allowing for fair and equal representation of all constituents.
By allowing congressional members to be elected by popular vote, it ensures that the people's voices are heard and their needs and concerns are represented in government.
It also promotes a more diverse and inclusive representation, rather than one that is dominated by a particular political party or interest group. Overall, a popular vote system for congressional members would lead to a more democratic and equitable society.
To know more about political polarization click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/31375833#
#SPJ11
Explain the statmemt in hindu raj after british raj would be even wores
Following the arrival of the British, many changes occurred in Indian society. Though the British and Hindu Raj were adverse, the conditions would also have been poor.
The subcontinent was divided into two separate nation nations in 1947 Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan when the British finally left India after 300 years. Millions of Muslims immediately set out on one of the largest migrations in human history, making their way to West and East Pakistan.
There would still be a climate of distrust among the communities even if there had not been a division. It wouldn't have been a perfect world where everyone gets along. Few Muslims would have attended the assembly if partition had not occurred and India had remained one. Additionally, the Kashmir conflict and the current struggle between India and Pakistan over Kashmir may not have arisen.
Read more about British on:
https://brainly.com/question/28734617
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
explain the statement hindu raj after british raj would be even worse. What could have been the plight of Muslim if lndia had not been divided?
1234567
for which purpose might a country use propaganda?
to highlight the troubles within a country to ask for help
to show only the good things about that country
to make people want to leave their country and visit another
to help promote education and new ideas within their country
to show only the good things about that country
Briefly explains one major difference between Thomas's and Appleby's historical interpretations of influences on the constitution
i need help with this
Answer: 1 Fidel Castro takes over Cuba 2 The Soviet Union Helps Cuba build up its military 3 The United States helps lauch The Bay of pigs Invaision 4 A wave Migration from Cuba to the United States begins
Explanation:
Heat and pressure drive water out of the rock.
[ Choose ]
Magma rises towards the surface.
First
The tectonic plate subducts.
[ Choose ]
The water lowers the melting temperature of the mantle.
[ Choose ]
Volcanoes form on the plate that does not subduct.
Heat and pressure drive the water out of rock and volcanoes form on the plate that does not subduct.
What are volcanoes?Volcanoes are geological formations that occur when molten rock, ash, and gas escape from the Earth's mantle or crust through an opening in the Earth's surface called a vent. This eruption can range from a steady flow of lava to violent explosions that can release ash, gas, and rock fragments into the atmosphere. Volcanoes can be found both on land and under the ocean, and they are often associated with tectonic plate boundaries where one plate is subducting under another. They play a critical role in shaping the Earth's landscape and are responsible for creating new land, such as islands and mountain ranges. While many volcanoes are dormant or extinct, some remain active and pose a significant threat to human life and property. Volcanic eruptions can cause a range of hazards, including lava flows, pyroclastic flows, ashfall, and volcanic gases, which can have far-reaching impacts on the environment and global climate.
To learn more about mountain, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30200758
#SPJ1
What complaint did southerners make about william lloyd garrison in connection with nat turner
Southerners complained that William Lloyd Garrison, an abolitionist, contributed to the radicalization of slaves through his anti-slavery newspaper, The Liberator, which they believed incited events like Nat Turner's rebellion.
William Lloyd Garrison was a prominent abolitionist and editor of the anti-slavery newspaper, The Liberator. He was a fierce opponent of slavery and believed in the immediate and complete abolition of the institution. His views and activism made him a controversial figure, particularly in the southern states.
In connection with the Nat Turner rebellion in 1831, southerners accused Garrison of promoting and inciting slave insurrections through his writings and speeches. Nat Turner was a slave who led a rebellion in Virginia, killing several white people before being captured and executed.
Many Southerners believed that Garrison's anti-slavery rhetoric and calls for immediate emancipation inspired Turner and other slaves to rebel against their masters.
Garrison vehemently denied these accusations and condemned the use of violence in the struggle against slavery. He argued that slavery was a moral abomination and that it was the duty of all Americans to work towards its abolition. He also believed in the power of peaceful resistance and civil disobedience to effect social change.
Despite his commitment to non-violence, Garrison's advocacy for the abolition of slavery and his uncompromising stance against it made him a target of Southern ire. He received death threats and was often the subject of violence and harassment.
However, his steadfast commitment to the cause of freedom and justice inspired a generation of abolitionists and helped to lay the groundwork for the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
To know more about William Lloyd Garrison refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31118087#
#SPJ11
What presidents (Current Era) dealt with Immigration Right Movement?
Answer:
Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation:
i think may be wrong tho
In what ways was the outlook and agenda of Progressives in tension with the Founders’ approach to the proper role of government?
Answer:
The outlook and agenda of Progressives in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were in tension with the Founders’ approach to the proper role of government in several ways. Here are some examples:
Limited government: The Founders believed in a limited government with enumerated powers, meaning that the federal government should only have the authority to do what the Constitution explicitly allows. Progressives, on the other hand, believed in a more expansive role for the federal government, including the power to regulate the economy, oversee social welfare, and protect consumers.
Individual rights: The Founders placed a strong emphasis on individual rights, including the right to free speech, assembly, and the press. Progressives were more concerned with collective rights and social justice, including workplace safety regulations, minimum wage laws, and the regulation of monopolies.
Popular sovereignty: The Founders believed in popular sovereignty, meaning that the people have the ultimate authority over the government. Progressives, on the other hand, believed in a more technocratic approach to governance, with experts and bureaucrats making decisions in the public interest.
States' rights: The Founders believed in a federal system of government, with power divided between the national government and the states. Progressives were more focused on national problems and believed in a stronger central government that could address issues that were beyond the scope of individual states.
Overall, the Progressive agenda represented a departure from the Founders’ approach to limited government and individual rights and instead embraced a more expansive role for government in regulating the economy and promoting social welfare. While both the Founders and the Progressives were committed to the idea of American exceptionalism and the principles of liberty and equality, they had different ideas about how best to achieve these goals.
What is the point of including the childhood prayer in the introduction
Answer:
Explanation:
Without more context, it is difficult to know exactly which childhood prayer is being referred to and in what context it is being included in the introduction. However, in general, the point of including a childhood prayer in an introduction could be to provide a personal or emotional connection with the reader or audience. Depending on the nature of the prayer, it could also be used to establish a particular tone or theme for the piece of writing or speech.
For example, if the prayer is one that emphasizes humility, compassion, or gratitude, including it in the introduction could signal to the reader or audience that these values are important to the writer or speaker and will be central to the message they are trying to convey. Alternatively, if the prayer is one that evokes a sense of comfort or familiarity, including it in the introduction could help to create a sense of intimacy or trust between the writer or speaker and the reader or audience.
Ultimately, the point of including a childhood prayer in an introduction will depend on the specific context and purpose of the piece of writing or speech.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Summarize the argument that harriet and her husband make as to why they deserve to be free.
Harriet and her husband argue that they deserve to be free based on their natural rights as human beings, the immorality of slavery, and their potential contributions to society as free citizens.
In their argument, Harriet and her husband emphasize that, as human beings, they possess natural rights that should not be violated, including the right to liberty. They assert that slavery is an inherently immoral institution that denies them these fundamental rights.
By highlighting their skills, talents, and potential, they contend that they could contribute more effectively to society if allowed to live as free citizens. They also appeal to the compassion and empathy of their audience, sharing personal stories and experiences to illustrate the inhumanity and cruelty of slavery.
In essence, Harriet and her husband call for their freedom based on principles of justice, morality, and the potential for a better future for themselves and their community.
To know more about morality click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1420034#
#SPJ11
Gisela lives in a country where all the means of production are controlled by
the government. She publicly writes and speaks about this type of system
hurting more people than it helps. Gisela is acting as
O A. a laborer
O B. an advocate
OC. a capitalist
D. a communist
We have been invited to shed our innocent blood in this world war which is now in
progress. In the past, it was said indirectly that Africa had nothing to do with the
civilized world. But now we find that the poor African has already been plunged
into the great war. The masses of our people are ready to put on uniforms, ignorant
of what they have to face or why they have to face it. We natives have been loyal
since the commencement of this (British) Government, and in all departments of
Nyasaland the welfare of the British would have been incomplete without our
loyalty. But in time of peace the Government failed to help the underdog. In time
of peace everything was for Europeans only. But in time of war it has been found
that we are needed to share hardships and shed our blood in equality. The poor
Africans who have nothing to win in this present world are invited to die for a
cause which is not theirs.
*The letter was published but later retracted by the newspaper's British editors,
A broader historical context relevant to the prompt is the colonization of Africa by European powers and their exploitation of African resources and labor.
European powers, including Britain, colonized various regions of Africa during the 19th and early 20th centuries, often with the goal of exploiting their resources and labor. This led to the subjugation of African peoples, who were treated as inferior and denied basic rights and freedoms. The British government, in particular, implemented policies that favored European settlers and did little to improve the lives of Africans.
This legacy of exploitation and inequality continued through the early 20th century, leading to the frustration expressed by the speaker in the prompt. The outbreak of World War II, with its need for manpower and resources, led to a shift in attitudes towards African participation in the war effort. However, this shift was not accompanied by a corresponding shift in attitudes towards African rights and equality, leading to continued tensions and frustrations among African peoples.
-----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"We have been invited to shed our innocent blood in this world war which is now in progress. In the past, it was said indirectly that Africa had nothing to do with the civilized world. But now we find that the poor African has already been plunged into the great war. The masses of our people are ready to put on uniforms, ignorant of what they have to face or why they have to face it. We natives have been loyal since the commencement of this (British) Government, and in all departments of Nyasaland the welfare of the British would have been incomplete without our loyalty. But in time of peace the Government failed to help the underdog. In time of peace everything was for Europeans only. But in time of war it has been found that we are needed to share hardships and shed our blood in equality. The poor Africans who have nothing to win in this present world are invited to die for a cause which is not theirs.
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt?"------------
To know more about colonization , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30900919
#SPJ4
please help with this cuase iant doin allat
China was split throughout the 1920s when a fight for dominance between the CCP and KMT erupted.
What happened in China during that time?China had some industrialization throughout the 1930s, while suffering casualties as a result of battles between the CCP, the Nationalist government in Nanjing, remaining warlords, and the Empire of Japan after the Japanese invasion of Manchuria.
Conflict broke out over Asia much before World War Two officially started. Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931 in search of raw materials to supply its booming industries. A significant area of China had been occupied by Japan by 1937, and atrocities committed against Chinese people had become commonplace.
The Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-45) was a battle that began when China launched a mass rebellion against the extension of Japanese control throughout its region (which had begun in 1931).
Japan had been expanding its influence in Manchuria for a while, and now the area was formally under its control. The Japanese also assaulted Shanghai in 1932 after successfully taking control of Manchuria.
The battle, also known as the War of Resistance against Japan in China, is also referred to as the Second Sino-Japanese War. A full-scale war between China and Japan lasted from 1937 until 1945, notwithstanding the assertions of some that the Manchurian incursion in 1931 was the catalyst for the conflict.
What occurred in India during those ten years?India launches its Non-Cooperation Movement in September 1920 under the direction of MK Gandhi. It results from the outrage that followed the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar, in which British-led soldiers shot and murdered over 400 residents who were unarmed while also hurting several more.
In order to protest British rule in India, Mohandas Gandhi organized the Salt March, which took place in India from March to April of that year. The march, which was attended by thousands of Indians, traveled 240 kilometers from Gandhi's spiritual retreat in Ahmedabad to the Arabian Sea beach.
Civil disobedience and the Salt Satyagraha from 1930 to 1931, the Quit India movement from about 1940 to 1942, and noncooperation from 1919 to 22 were the three primary initiatives that Gandhi oversaw and led. Other notable occurrences in this decade included the Chauri Chaura tragedy and the Khilafat Movement.
Learn more about Non-Cooperation Movement: https://brainly.com/question/26612251
#SPJ1
How can a speech or public statement resonate differently with various audiences, depending upon their point of view?
A speech or public statement can resonate differently with various audiences depending on their point of view due to factors like cultural background, personal beliefs, and emotional connection.
The speaker's message may be interpreted differently based on the audience's prior experiences and knowledge. Additionally, the use of language, tone, and rhetoric can impact how well the message is received. Some individuals might feel inspired, while others may feel indifferent or even offended by the same speech.
To effectively communicate with diverse audiences, it's essential for the speaker to consider these factors and adapt their message accordingly, aiming for inclusivity and empathy to maximize resonance with different listeners.
To know more about cultural background visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11079603
#SPJ11
What was the battle of LA?
Answer:
Military action fought on 22 March 1880
The Battle of Los Ángeles was a military action fought on 22 March 1880 between the Chilean and Peruvian armies during the Tacna and Arica Campaign of the War of the Pacific. The Chilean forces under Commander in chief Manuel Baquedano assaulted and defeated the Allied stronghold guided by Andrés Gamarra garrisoned at Los Angeles hill top
Explanation:
How did the invention of machine guns influence European states in the 19th
century?
OA. It led them to devote nearly all their resources to producing
weapons.
OB. It convinced them to avoid war, as military conflict became
deadlier than ever.
OC. It allowed them to more easily conquer and control colonies in
Africa and Asia.
OD. It helped nationalist groups win their independence from large
empires.
Answer:C
Explanation: A is wrong 'cause European nations on 19th century Generally uses most of the resources for Buildin manufactories and Trade ships
B is wrong 'cause europe always in war and machine guns didn't change it
D is wrong because basicly the empires ? itself have the machine guns to
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Jim Crow laws are
passed in the South.
A. The Ku Klux Klan is forced to disband.
B. African Americans are forced to leave the South.
C. The Freedmen's Bureau gains influence.
D. Public services become racially segregated.
?
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Public services become racially segregated
In the 5th century b.c.e., which two forms of government alternated back and forth? ancient greece
Answer: In the 5th century BCE, the two forms of government that alternated back and forth in Ancient Greece were democracy and oligarchy.
How was the removal of the kulaks representative of the kind of government stalin was seeking to create?
The removal of the kulaks, or wealthy peasants, was representative of the kind of government Stalin was seeking to create in the Soviet Union. Stalin's government aimed to eliminate all forms of opposition to the Soviet state and consolidate power under his rule.
The kulaks were seen as a threat to this goal because they had the resources and influence to challenge the government's authority. Stalin used violent and repressive measures to remove the kulaks, including confiscating their property and exiling them to remote areas.
This allowed Stalin to strengthen his grip on the Soviet Union and ensure that the Communist Party remained in control. Ultimately, the removal of the kulaks represented Stalin's desire for absolute power and his willingness to use any means necessary to achieve it.
To know more about Soviet Union, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/10173240#
#SPJ11
As governor of georgia, jimmy carter actively supported the republican party
integration
segregation
the republican party
all of lester maddox's policies
As governor of georgia, jimmy carter actively supported the republican party integration.
As governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter actively supported integration and opposed segregation, which put him at odds with Governor Lester Maddox and the policies of the Democratic Party at the time. However, he did not support the Republican Party during his time as governor.
As governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter actively supported integration, not segregation. He supported the end of segregation in public schools, abolished the state's discriminatory voting system, and worked to appoint African Americans to state boards and commissions.
Carter was a member of the Democratic Party and not the Republican Party. He served as Georgia's governor from 1971 to 1975 before running for President as a Democrat in 1976, which he won. During his presidency, he continued to support integration and civil rights, signing legislation to strengthen the Voting Rights Act and creating the Department of Education.
Lester Maddox was a segregationist and a political opponent of Carter. Maddox served as Georgia's governor from 1967 to 1971 and was known for his opposition to integration and his support for segregation. Carter ran for governor against Maddox in 1970 and won, becoming Georgia's first governor to support integration and civil rights.
To know more about republican party integration refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31874305#
#SPJ11
Which sentence from "The End of the Aztec Empire" is used to support the idea that the Aztec Empire thrived during the 14th and 15th centuries? They raised crops that included maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chiles to trade in busy marketplaces. Moctezuma II welcomed Cortés and his men, hoping that by inviting them into the capital city, he could learn about the Spaniards and discover their weaknesses. Cortés and his men left Tenochtitlán because the native people were very angry with them. The flag of Mexico includes the ancient symbol of the Aztec Empire, an eagle with a snake in its mouth
A. They farmed maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chilies to trade in crowded markets, according to a statement.
The Aztec civilization is known as the final of the great Mesoamerican civilizations before the arrival of the Europeans. They built amazing temple pyramids, used complex agricultural techniques, founded a huge empire, and sacrificed humanity to their gods.
Tenochtitlan, also known as Tenochca, Texcoco, and Tlacopan, were previously part of the Tepanec monarchy, whose dominant power was Azcapotzalco, and became the Aztec Empire in 1427.
According to a statement used to support the belief that the Aztec Empire prospered throughout the 14th and 15th centuries, they grew maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chilies to trade in packed markets. As a result, option A is the correct answer.
To know more about Aztech Empire:
https://brainly.com/question/576529
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Which of the following sentences from “The End of the Aztec Empire” is used to support the idea that the Aztec Empire thrived during the 14th and 15th centuries?
A. They raised crops that included maize, avocados, beans, squash, sweet potatoes, tomatoes, and chilies to trade in busy marketplaces.
B. Moctezuma welcomed Cortés and his men, hoping that by inviting them into the capital city, he could learn about the Spaniards and discover their weaknesses.
C. Cortés and his men left Tenochtitlán because the native people were very angry with them.
D. The flag of Mexico includes the ancient symbol of the Aztec Empire, an eagle with a snake in its mouth.
Explain the historical circumstances that led to the historical development of the following image:
Use the following vocabulary
Europeans/Europe/Great Britain
Ghana/Kenya/Kwame Nkrumah/Jomo Kenyatta
Pan-Africanism/nationalism
decolonization
as a result/so/because/led to
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, European powers, especially Great Britain, colonized much of Africa, including Ghana and Kenya.
This period of colonialism, where European powers established political and economic control over African territories, lasted until the mid-20th century. In response to this colonization, Pan-Africanism and nationalism emerged as movements calling for African unity and self-determination. Leaders like Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana and Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya played significant roles in these movements.
As a result of these movements, African countries began to gain their independence from their colonizers. Decolonization of Africa began in the 1950s and continued through the 1960s. The struggle for independence was often long and violent, but eventually, most African countries became independent nations.
The image that developed was that of a newly independent Africa, with countries led by African leaders who had fought for their nations' freedom. These leaders often espoused Pan-African ideals of unity and cooperation between African countries, and nationalism, which celebrated African culture and traditions. The image of a decolonized Africa represented hope for a continent that had suffered from European exploitation and oppression for centuries.
To know more about Europeans here
https://brainly.com/question/24877599
#SPJ1
write 5-7 sentences minimum as to why this source supports the new deal.
The New Deal was a set of policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to Great Depression of 1930s.
What was the New Deal?The New Deal was a series of programs, policies, and reforms introduced by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression. The New Deal aimed to provide relief, recovery, and reform for the American people by creating jobs, stabilizing the banking system, regulating the stock market, and establishing social welfare programs. Some of the most significant New Deal programs included the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Works Progress Administration, and the Social Security Act. The New Deal helped to stimulate economic growth and provided support for millions of Americans during one of the most challenging times in US history.
To learn more about New Deal, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14027150
#SPJ1
What claims does President Truman make about why the aid to Greece is necessary
President Truman claims that aid to Greece is necessary because the country is facing a communist insurgency that threatens to overthrow its democratic government.
In his speech to Congress on March 12, 1947, Truman argued that the United States had a moral obligation to support Greece and other nations facing similar threats to their freedom and independence. He also emphasized the strategic importance of Greece as a bulwark against Soviet expansion in the Eastern Mediterranean.
By providing economic and military aid to Greece, Truman hoped to strengthen its ability to resist communist subversion and maintain stability in the region.
Ultimately, Truman's policy of containment aimed to contain Soviet influence and prevent the spread of communism around the world.
To know more about democratic government click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/2849514#
#SPJ11
Which sentence from "jane addams - making a difference" supports the idea that addams made an unselfish decision to live a life of service when she decided what career path she would follow
a as a young woman, addams struggled with various health issues, including a spinal defect that made it difficult for her to be active.
b she earned a college degree and began traveling, searching for how she could make a difference with her life.
c addams could have found a comfortable job, but she chose the difficult life of helping those less fortunate.
d she gave speeches to the wealthy in order to raise money and gather volunteers.
The sentence that supports the idea that Addams made an unselfish decision to live a life of service is option C: "Addams could have found a comfortable job, but she chose the difficult life of helping those less fortunate."
The phrase "Addams could have found a comfortable job, but she chose the difficult life of helping those less fortunate" demonstrates how selfless Jane Addams was in choosing to live a life of service. (Choice C).
According to this statement, Addams had the option of pursuing a more financially secure and pleasant job, but she choose to devote her life to helping those who were less fortunate. This choice suggests that her career path was motivated by something other than her own comfort or financial gain.
Learn more about the life of service:
https://brainly.com/question/31589383
#SPJ4
