Please answer this correctly

Answer:

The number of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g is 61

Step-by-step explanation:

The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:

68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

In this problem, we have that:

Mean = 88g

Standard deviation = 1g

Percentage of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g

87 = 88-1

So 87 is one standard deviation below the mean.

89 = 88+1

So 89 is one standard deviation above the mean.

By the Empirical Rule, 68% of students are reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g.

Out of 90 students:

0.68*90 = 61.2

Rounding to the nearest whole number:

The number of students reporting readings between 87 g and 89 g is 61

Answer:

a = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given P(x) = 2 x+4 a

          Q(x)=4 x - 2

          P( Q(4)) = 60

         P(4 (4) - 2) = 60

        P( 14 ) = 60

       2 (14) + 4 a = 60

        4 a + 28 = 60

Subtracting '28' on both sides , we get

       4 a +28 - 28 = 60 - 28

       4 a = 32

Dividing '4' on both sides , we get

        a = 8

Answer:

The probability that a selected consumer, given that is 70 years old, likes Crunchicles is 12.78%.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete:

Three hundred consumers were surveyed about a new brand of snack food, Crunchicles. Their age groups and preferences are given in the table.

                           18–24 25–34 35–55 55 and over Total

Liked Crunchicles   4       9       3 23                  39

Disliked Crunchicles 5        27      28 64              124

No Preference         7        27          10 93                 137

Total                        16        63      41 180            300

One consumer from the survey is selected at random. If the selected consumer is 70 years old, what is the probability that he/she likes crunchicles .

If the consumer is 70 years old is included in the category "55 and over" from this survey. There are 180 subjects in that category.

The number that likes Crunchicles and are 55 and over is 23.

If we calculate the probability as the relative frequency, we have:

[tex]P(\text{L }|\text{ 55+})=\dfrac{P(\text{L \& 55+})}{P(5\text{5+})}=\dfrac{23}{180}=0.1278[/tex]

L: Likes Crunchicles.

The probability that a selected consumer, given that is 70 years old, likes Crunchicles is 12.78%.

Answer:

slope = 3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

3x-2y=6

Get this equation in the form y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

Subtract 3x from each side

3x-3x-2y=-3x+6

-2y = -3x+6

Divide each side by -2

-2y/-2 = -3x/-2 +6/-2

y = 3/2x -3

The slope is 3/2 and the y intercept is -3

Answer:

3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

I got this answer by putting it in the form y=mx+b

Step 1: Subtract 3x from each side

-2y = -3x+6

Step 2: Divide each side by -2

y = 3/2x -3

The slope is 3/2 and the y intercept is -3 because m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I= P*r*t

I = 12000* 7% *4

Total interest paid was $3360.

Answer: $3,360

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

320 x^6

Step-by-step explanation:

(5x^3)(4x)^3

5 x^3  * 4^3 * x*3

5x^3 *64x^3

320 x^6

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

= 5x^3  * 4^3 * x^3

= 5x^3 *64x^3

= 320x^6

Hope this helps!

Answer:

(C) 10

Step-by-step explanation:

x+y−z=8

Subtract y from both sides

x-z= -y+8

Add z to both sides

x= -y+z+8

Subtract 8 from both sides

x-8= -y+z

x−y+z=12

Add y to both sides

x+z=12+y

Subtract z from both sides

x=y-z+12

Subtract 12 from both sides

x-12=y-z

Multiply both sides by -1

-x+12= -y+z

Combine equations:

x-8= -x+12

Add x to both sides

2x-8+12

Add 8 to both sides

2x=20

Divide both sides by 2

x=10

The answer is (C) 10.

Answer:

x = 2 is the solution of the given equation

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given equation

  [tex]\sqrt{x+6-4} = x[/tex]

squaring on both sides , we get

[tex](\sqrt{x+2})^{2} = x^{2}[/tex]

⇒ x + 2 = x²

⇒x² - x -2 =0

Step(ii):-

  Given x² - x -2 =0

⇒ x² - 2x + x - 2 =0

⇒ x ( x-2) + 1(x - 2) =0

⇒ (x + 1) ( x-2) =0

⇒ x = -1 and x =2

x = 2 is the solution of the given equation

Verification:-

[tex]\sqrt{x+6-4} = x[/tex]

Put x= 2

[tex]\sqrt{2+6-4} = 2[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{4} = 2[/tex]

 2 = 2

Answer:

daddy wants some more dior

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) We can not estimate the probability.

b) Zero probability.

c) There is a probability between 95% and 99% that they have between 475 and 525 customers on a given day.

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We can not said nothing because we only know the average of customers per day. We need to know the probability distribution of the amount of customers per day to answer this question.

b) Now that we know that the variance is 100, although we do not know the exact distribution of the values, we can use the empirical rules to estimate the probability of having at least 700 customers on a given day.

If the variance is 100, the standard deviation is √100=10.

Applying the empirical rule (68-95-99.7 rule), we know that there is probability 0.15% of having at least 500+3*10=530 customers per day (more than 3 deviations from the mean).

Then, we can conclude that the probability of having at least 700 customers per day is zero.

c) To estimate this probability, we have to calculate how many deviations from the mean this values represent:

[tex]\Delta_1=475-500=-25=2.5\sigma\\\\\Delta_2=525-500=25=2.5\sigma[/tex]

We have an interval that have a width of ±2.5 deviations from the mean.

For 2 deviations from the mean, it is expected to have 95% of the data.

For 3 deviations from the mean, it is expected to have 99.7% of the data.

Then, for the interval 475 to 525, we can estimate a probability between 95% and 99%.

Answer:

6 less than a number is equal to 1 and 4 tenths

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

13.53% probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period

Step-by-step explanation:

In a Poisson distribution, the probability that X represents the number of successes of a random variable is given by the following formula:

[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\mu}*\mu^{x}}{(x)!}[/tex]

In which

x is the number of sucesses

e = 2.71828 is the Euler number

[tex]\mu[/tex] is the mean in the given time interval.

They arrive at a rate of two every five minutes

This means that [tex]\mu = 2[/tex]

What is the probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period?

This is P(X = 0).

[tex]P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\mu}*\mu^{x}}{(x)!}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 0) = \frac{e^{-2}*2^{0}}{(0)!} = 0.1353[/tex]

13.53% probability that no customers arrive in a five-minute period

Answer: Option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have two equations for the circumference, one for each circle:

C = 2*pi*r

C' = 2*pi*r'

now, if we take the quotient of those two equations, the left side must still be equal to the left side, this means that:

C/C' = 2*pi*r/(2*pi*r') = r/r'

So we have the relation:

C/C' = r/r'

And this is obtained for the division property of equality.

IF A = B, then as both numbers are equal, if we divide both sides by the same thing, then the equality must remain true.

Then the correct option is A.

Answer:

4.50 is for two scoops and a normal cone. Upgrades on cone is $0.50 and any additional toppings are also $0.50

Answer:5 × t = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: 4.50 + 0.50 = 5

Step 2: We has 5t is 5 × t

Step 3: 5 × t = 6

Answer 9 is in the domain of f g

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is the first one on the bottom left.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

cos X(tanX+cotX) =cscX​

cos X(sinx/cosx +cosx/sinx) =cscx

cos X (sin²+cos²/cossin)=cscx

cosx(1/cossin)=cscx

cross out cosines

1/sinx=cscx

Answer:  The correct answer is:  " 2x² " .

________________________________

Step-by-step explanation:

________________________________

We are asked:  "What is the sum of:  "x + x² + 2" and "x² − 2 − x" ?

Since we are to find the "sum" ;

  →  We are to "add" these 2 (two) expressions together:

     →     (x + x² + 2) +  (x² − 2 − x) ;

Note:  Let us rewrite the above, by adding the number "1" as a coefficient to:  the values "x" ; and "x² " ;  since there is an "implied coefficient of "1" ;

            → {since:  "any value" ; multiplied by "1"; results in that exact same value.}.

            →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Rewrite as:

             →     1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us add the "coefficient" , "1" ; just before the expression:

             "(1x² − 2 − 1x)" ;  

         {since "any value", multiplied by "1" , equals that same value.}.

And rewrite the expression; as follows:

            →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  1(1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us consider the following part of the expression:

                     →  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

________________________________

Note the distributive property of multiplication:

   →  " a(b+c) = ab + ac " ;

and likewise:

   →  " a(b+c+d) = ab + ac + ad " .

________________________________

So; we have:

→  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

  = (+1 * 1x²)  +  (+1 *-2) + (+1*-1x) ;

  =       + 1x²    +    (-2)     +  (-1x) ;

  =       +1x²    −    2   −  1x  ;

  ↔    ( + 1x²  −  1x  −  2)

Now, bring down the "left-hand side of the expression:

1x + 1x² + 2 ;

and add the rest of the expression:

     →  1x  +  1x²  +  2  +   1x²  −  1x  −  2 ;

________________________________

Now, simplify by combining the "like terms" ; as follows:

   +1x² + 1x² = 2x²  ;

   +1x −  1x = 0 ;  

   + 2 −  2  = 0 ;

________________________________

The answer is: " 2x² " .

________________________________

Hope this is helpful to you!

   Best wishes!

________________________________

Answer:

The correct answer is:  " 2x² " .

________________________________

Step-by-step explanation:

________________________________

We are asked:  "What is the sum of:  "x + x² + 2" and "x² − 2 − x" ?

Since we are to find the "sum" ;

 →  We are to "add" these 2 (two) expressions together:

    →     (x + x² + 2) +  (x² − 2 − x) ;

Note:  Let us rewrite the above, by adding the number "1" as a coefficient to:  the values "x" ; and "x² " ;  since there is an "implied coefficient of "1" ;

           → {since:  "any value" ; multiplied by "1"; results in that exact same value.}.

           →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Rewrite as:

            →     1x + 1x² + 2) +  (1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us add the "coefficient" , "1" ; just before the expression:

            "(1x² − 2 − 1x)" ;  

        {since "any value", multiplied by "1" , equals that same value.}.

And rewrite the expression; as follows:

           →     (1x + 1x² + 2) +  1(1x² − 2 − 1x) ;

Now, let us consider the following part of the expression:

                    →  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

________________________________

Note the distributive property of multiplication:

  →  " a(b+c) = ab + ac " ;

and likewise:

  →  " a(b+c+d) = ab + ac + ad " .

________________________________

So; we have:

→  " +1(1x² − 2 − 1x) " ;

 = (+1 * 1x²)  +  (+1 *-2) + (+1*-1x) ;

 =       + 1x²    +    (-2)     +  (-1x) ;

 =       +1x²    −    2   −  1x  ;

 ↔    ( + 1x²  −  1x  −  2)

Now, bring down the "left-hand side of the expression:

1x + 1x² + 2 ;

and add the rest of the expression:

    →  1x  +  1x²  +  2  +   1x²  −  1x  −  2 ;

________________________________

Now, simplify by combining the "like terms" ; as follows:

  +1x² + 1x² = 2x²  ;

  +1x −  1x = 0 ;  

  + 2 −  2  = 0 ;

________________________________

The answer is: " 2x² " .

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 wild cards

Step-by-step explanation:

Typical would mean most often

2 wild cards shows up 6 times which is most often

Answer:

let the two number is x and y

x + y = 4 1/2 .....(i)

x - y = 3 1/4 ......(ii)

adding question (i) and (ii)

x + y = 9/2

x - y = 31/4

=> 2x = 31/4

x = 8/31

substituting the value x in equation 1

8/31 + y = 9/ 2

y = 9/2 - 8/31

y =203/62

the value of x = 8/31

y = 203/62

Answer:

Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 \leq \mu_2[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]

The statistic is given by:

[tex]t= \frac{\bar X_1 -\bar X_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1} +\frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] t=\frac{72.86-67.34}{\sqrt{\frac{15.98^2}{150} +\frac{35.67^2}{275}}}=2.194[/tex]

And the best option would be:

2.19

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following info given:

n1 = 150 n2 = 275

[tex]\bar x_1 = 72.86, \bar x_2 = 67.34[/tex]

s1 = 15.98 s2 = 35.67

We want to test the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 \leq \mu_2[/tex]

Alternative hypothesis: [tex]\mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]

The statistic is given by:

[tex]t= \frac{\bar X_1 -\bar X_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1} +\frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}}[/tex]

And replacing we got:

[tex] t=\frac{72.86-67.34}{\sqrt{\frac{15.98^2}{150} +\frac{35.67^2}{275}}}=2.194[/tex]

And the best option would be:

2.19

Answer:

  4u²

Step-by-step explanation:

  [tex]\dfrac{12u^3 + 48u^2v}{3u+12v}=\dfrac{12u^2(u+4v)}{3(u+4v)}=\boxed{4u^2}[/tex]

Common factors cancel from numerator and denominator. The one factor that might make the expression undefined is given as non-zero, so no additional restrictions apply.

Answer:

[tex]x=-10[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{x}{2}=-5\\\mathrm{Multiply\:both\:sides\:by\:}2\\\frac{2x}{2}=2\left(-5\right)\\Simplify\\x=-10[/tex]

Answer:

so we have an inequality for y -

7.995<y<8.005

Then now we need in inequality for x

(y-4)/5 = x

so that means that so if we have (7.995-4)/5 we get 3.995/5 = 7.99

so we have our first 7.99<x<b

Now we solve for b

So that means that 5.005/5 = 1.001

since we are changing it we switch our signs

from 7.99<x<1.001

we do 7.99>x>1.001

therefore

1.001<x<7.99

Answer:

0.795 [tex]\leq[/tex] y [tex]\leq[/tex] 0.805

Step-by-step explanation:

8 = 5x + 4

5x = 4

x = 4/5 or 0.800

therefore 0.800 + .005 and 0.800 - .005 =

0.795 [tex]\leq[/tex] y [tex]\leq[/tex] 0.805

Answer:

C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Measure of arcURN = 270°

In radians:

270° = 270π/180

270° = 3π/2

Now

Area of sector = 1/2r²∅

= 1/2(10)²(3π/2)

= 50(3π/2)

= 75π

Answer:

For k = 1:

=NEGBINOMDIST(0, 1, 0.666) = 0.6660

For k = 2:

=NEGBINOMDIST(1, 1, 0.666) = 0.2224

For k = 3:

=NEGBINOMDIST(2, 1, 0.666) = 0.0743

For k = 4:

=NEGBINOMDIST(3, 1, 0.666) = 0.0248

For k = 5:

=NEGBINOMDIST(4, 1, 0.666) = 0.0083

For k = 6:

=NEGBINOMDIST(5, 1, 0.666) = 0.0028

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability of obtaining a defective 10-year old widget is 66.6%

p = 66.6% = 0.666

The probability of obtaining a non-defective 10-year old widget is

q = 1 - 0.666 = 0.334

The random variable will be the number of items that must be tested before finding the first defective 10-year old widget.

The geometric distribution is given by

[tex]$P(X = k) = p \times q^{k - 1}$[/tex]

Solving manually:

For k = 1:

[tex]P(X = 1) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{1 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{0} = 0.666[/tex]

For k = 2:

[tex]P(X = 2) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{2 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{1} = 0.2224[/tex]

For k = 3:

[tex]P(X = 3) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{3 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{2} = 0.0743[/tex]

For k = 4:

[tex]P(X = 4) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{4 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{3} = 0.0248[/tex]

For k = 5:

[tex]P(X = 5) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{5 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{4} = 0.0083[/tex]

For k = 6:

[tex]P(X = 6) = 0.666 \times 0.334^{6 - 1} = 0.666 \times 0.334^{5} = 0.0028[/tex]

Using Excel function:

NEGBINOMDIST(number_f, number_s, probability_s)

Where

number_f = k - 1 failures

number_s = no. of successes

probability_s = the probability of success

For the geometric distribution, let number_s = 1

For k = 1:

=NEGBINOMDIST(0, 1, 0.666) = 0.6660

For k = 2:

=NEGBINOMDIST(1, 1, 0.666) = 0.2224

For k = 3:

=NEGBINOMDIST(2, 1, 0.666) = 0.0743

For k = 4:

=NEGBINOMDIST(3, 1, 0.666) = 0.0248

For k = 5:

=NEGBINOMDIST(4, 1, 0.666) = 0.0083

For k = 6:

=NEGBINOMDIST(5, 1, 0.666) = 0.0028

As you can notice solving manually and using Excel yields the same results.

The probabilities are:

a. P(A) = 0.35

b. P(B|A) ≈ 0.349

c. P(A ∩ B) ≈ 0.122

d. P(A^c ∩ B) ≈ 0.228

e. P(B) = 0.35

f. P(A|B) = 0.349

g. A and B are independent.

Yes, it is reasonable to treat A and B as though they were independent because P(A) * P(B) = P(A ∩ B).

We have,

Given:

Total number of components (n) = 1000

Number of defective components (d) = 350

a.

P(A) is the probability that the first component drawn is defective:

P(A) = d/n = 350/1000 = 0.35

b.

P(B|A) is the probability that the second component drawn is defective given that the first component drawn is defective:

Since one defective component has already been drawn, the total number of components is now 999, and the number of defective components remaining is 349.

P(B|A) = Number of defective components remaining / Total number of components remaining = 349/999 ≈ 0.349

c.

P(A ∩ B) is the probability that both the first and second components drawn are defective:

P(A ∩ B) = P(A) * P(B|A) = 0.35 * 0.349 ≈ 0.122

d.

P([tex]A^c[/tex] ∩ B) is the probability that the first component drawn is not defective (complement of A) and the second component drawn is defective:

[tex]P(A^c)[/tex] is the probability that the first component drawn is not defective:

[tex]P(A^c)[/tex] = 1 - P(A) = 1 - 0.35 = 0.65

Since the first component drawn is not defective, the total number of components remaining is now 999, and the number of defective components remaining is still 350.

P([tex]A^c[/tex] ∩ B) = P([tex]A^c[/tex]) * P(B) = 0.65 * (350/999) ≈ 0.228

e.

P(B) is the probability that the second component drawn is defective:

P(B) = Number of defective components / Total number of components

= 350/1000

= 0.35

f.

P(A|B) is the probability that the first component drawn is defective given that the second component drawn is defective:

P(A|B) = P(A ∩ B) / P(B)

= (0.35 * 0.349) / 0.35

= 0.349

g.

To determine if A and B are independent, we need to compare

P(A) * P(B) with P(A ∩ B).

P(A) * P(B) = 0.35 * 0.35 = 0.1225

P(A ∩ B) = 0.122

Since P(A) * P(B) = P(A ∩ B), A and B are independent events.

It is reasonable to treat A and B as independent because the probability of A and the probability of B are not affected by each other.

The occurrence or non-occurrence of A does not impact the probability of B.

Thus,

The probabilities are:

a. P(A) = 0.35

b. P(B|A) ≈ 0.349

c. P(A ∩ B) ≈ 0.122

d. P(A^c ∩ B) ≈ 0.228

e. P(B) = 0.35

f. P(A|B) = 0.349

g. A and B are independent.

Yes, it is reasonable to treat A and B as though they were independent because P(A) * P(B) = P(A ∩ B).

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ4

Answer:

Yes, Because every x-value corresponds to exactly one y-value.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$350

Step-by-step explanation:

Let d = price of dryer

Then d - 61 is the price of the washer.

The sum of the prices is $639.

d + d - 61 = 639

2d - 61 = 639

2d = 700

d = 350

The price of the dryer is $350