Please answer this correctly

Answer:

[tex] m =\frac{y_2 -y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

Where x for this case represent the time and y the height waist off ground.

We have one point that can be extracted from the graph on this case:

[tex] x_1 = 1, y_1= 3[/tex]

Bout for the other point we have:

[tex] x_2 = 5.3 , y_2 = 9.6[/tex]

Is important to notice that 9.6 is an estimation since we don't have the scale to identify the real value. so then if we replace we got:

[tex] m =\frac{9.6-3}{5.3-1}= 1.535[/tex]

And for this case we can conclude that this slope is positive and around 1.5 and 1.6. And that means if we increase the time in one unit then the height off waist off ground would increae about 1.5 to 1.6 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to calculate the slope we need to use the following formula:

[tex] m =\frac{y_2 -y_1}{x_2 -x_1}[/tex]

Where x for this case represent the time and y the height waist off ground.

We have one point that can be extracted from the graph on this case:

[tex] x_1 = 1, y_1= 3[/tex]

Bout for the other point we have:

[tex] x_2 = 5.3 , y_2 = 9.6[/tex]

Is important to notice that 9.6 is an estimation since we don't have the scale to identify the real value. so then if we replace we got:

[tex] m =\frac{9.6-3}{5.3-1}= 1.535[/tex]

And for this case we can conclude that this slope is positive and around 1.5 and 1.6. And that means if we increase the time in one unit then the height off waist off ground would increae about 1.5 to 1.6 ft

Answer:

  $3.75

Step-by-step explanation:

I = Prt

I = $500·0.03·(3/12) = $3.75

The early-withdrawal fee is $3.75 for the first quarter.

_____

Each quarter after that, the principal amount will be larger, so the interest penalty will be larger. The fee would be the amount of interest that would be credited at the end of the next quarter, or at the end of the quarter currently in progress.

Answer: it is b because 2.5 lbs = 40 oz. then i know that 40 is half of 80 then there is not way it is the 1000 pound choice

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Quedan 2.083 m^3 de agua en el reservorio.

Equivalen a 2083 litros.

Step-by-step explanation:

Los dueños del restaurante tienen un reservorio de agua cuyo volumen es de 6.25 m^3.

Si han utilizado 2/3 del reservorio, esto implica que aún quedan en el reservorio una tercera parte del volumen original (1/3).

Entonces, la cantidad de metros cúbicos (m^3) de agua que quedan en el reservorio se puede calcular como:

[tex]V=(1/3)\cdot V_0=(1/3)\cdot6.25\,m^3=2.083\,m^3[/tex]

Este valor equivale a un volumen en litros de:

[tex]V=2.083\,m^3\cdot \dfrac{1,000\,l}{1m^3}=2,083\,l[/tex]

Answer: 3. 4[tex]\sqrt{13}[/tex]            4. [tex]\sqrt{225}[/tex]    

Step-by-step explanation:

8^2 + 12^3 = c^2

64 + 144 = c^2

208 = c^2

√208

[tex]4\sqrt{13}[/tex]

The final answer is the square root of 208

8^2 + b^2 = 17^2

64 + b^2 = 289

-64               64

   b^2 = 225

[tex]\sqrt{225}[/tex]

Here is the full question:

When a species has several variants of a phenotype passed on from generation to generation, we can form a hypothesis about the genetics of the trait based on Mendelian theories of genetic inheritance. For example, in a two-gene dominant epistatic model, the first gene masks the effect of the second gene, leading to the expression of three phenotype variants. Crossing the dominant and recessive homozygote lines would result in a second generation represented by a mix of dominant, intermediate, and recessive phenotype variants in the expected proportions: and respectively, also called a 12:3: 1 ratio.

Such a model can provide the basis for the null hypothesis in a significance test. A cross of white and green summer squash plants gives the number of squash in the second generation F2: 131 white squash, 34 yellow squash, and 10 green squash. Are these data consistent with a 12: 3: 1 dominant epistatic model of genetic inheritance( white being dominant)?

The null hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is                

Answer:

The null  hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is :

[tex]\mathbf{H_o:p_{white} = \frac{12}{16}, p_{yellow} = \frac{3}{16}; p_{green} = \frac{1}{16} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The objective of this question is to state the null hypothesis for the  chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

Given that:

There are three colors associated with this model . i,e White , yellow and green and they are in the ratio of 12:3:1

The total number of these color traits associated with this model = 12 + 3 + 1 = 16

Thus ;

The null  hypothesis for the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is :

[tex]\mathbf{H_o:p_{white} = \frac{12}{16}, p_{yellow} = \frac{3}{16}; p_{green} = \frac{1}{16} }[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Rational numbers are the result of dividing two integers. Intergers cannot be fractions. So 1.5 is rational but 3/2 is not.

Five rational numbers: 1.5, 6, 24.7, 384, 404.4, 1,980

I'm always happy to help :)

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it would have less weight to carry

Answer

About 219-220

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: $219.047619

Step-by-step explanation: 1150.00 ÷ 5.25 = 219.047619

Answer:

y = 1/2x + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope intercept form is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

When we count rise over run, we find that the slope is 1/2

y = 1/2x + b

The line intersects the y-axis at 4, so the y-intercept is 4.

y = 1/2x + 4

I hope this helps :))

Answer:

14.69% probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

When the distribution is normal, we use the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this question, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 28, \sigma = 7.6[/tex]

What is the probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 20. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{20 - 28}{7.6}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.05[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.05[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.1469

14.69% probability that defect length is at most 20 mm

Answer:

Rectangle C is 14 cm longer than B

Step-by-step explanation:

Let  x be the length of Rectangle A. Rectangle B is ¹/₅ longer than A Block B,

Therefore the length of rectangle B is:

[tex]x+\frac{1}{5}x[/tex]

Rectangle C is ¹/₃ longer than B, therefore the length of rectangle c is:

[tex]x+\frac{1}{5}x+\frac{1}{3}(x+\frac{1}{5}x) =x+ \frac{1}{5}x+\frac{1}{3}x+\frac{1}{15}x=x+\frac{9}{15}x[/tex]

The total length of all three rectangles is 133 cm.

Length of rectangle A + Length of rectangle B + Length of rectangle C = 133 cm

[tex]x+x+\frac{1}{5}x +x+\frac{9}{15}x=133\\x+x+x+\frac{1}{5}x +\frac{9}{15}x=133\\3x+\frac{12}{15}x=133\\ 45x+12x=1995\\57x=1995\\x=35cm[/tex]

Therefore the length of rectangle A is 35 cm, the length of rectangle B is [tex]35+\frac{1}{5}*35=42\ cm[/tex] and the length of rectangle C is [tex]35+\frac{9}{15}*35=56\ cm[/tex]

Rectangle C is ¹/₃ longer than B, which is 14 cm (42\3) longer than B

Answer:

The amount of heat lost by the aluminum is 31,500 J

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

mass of aluminum, m =  500 g

initial temperature of the aluminum, θ₁ = 100° C

final temperature of the aluminum, θ₂ = 30°C

specific heat capacity of water, C = 4.18 J/g °C

specific heat capacity of aluminum , C = 0.90 J/g

Heat lost by the aluminum is equal to heat gained by the water.

The amount of heat lost by the aluminum, is calculated as;

Q = MCΔθ

Q = 500 x 0.9 (100 - 30)

Q = 500 x 0.9 x 70

Q = 31,500 J

Therefore, the amount of heat lost by the aluminum is 31,500 J

Answer:

y = 1/4x + (any number)

Step-by-step explanation:

m = -8/2 = -4, the equation shown is y = -4x + 8

perpendicular is  y = 1/4x + (any number), you didn't say where the line was perpendicular.

Answer:

2044

Step-by-step explanation:

just follow the story

a person uses a

hanger (2)

to pop a

ball  (0)

then flies

two kites (44)

Answer:

1). 2044

Step-by-step explanation:

The story includes: a hanger, a ball, and two kites (in that order)

From the information given, a hanger is 2, a ball is 0, and a kite is 4.

So it would be 2044.

Answer:

A. Schaid draws a white sock and a green sock. It did not talk about no green sock

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to subtract [tex](x+1)^{2}[/tex] from [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex]

so, we start by performing the multiplication involved in the perfect square of the binomial [tex](x+1)[/tex], and obtain its expression in separate terms that can be combined:

[tex](x+1)^{2}=(x+1)\,(x+1)=x^2+x+x+1=x^2+2x+1[/tex]

Now we can subtract this trinomial from  [tex]7x^2-4x+6[/tex], and  combining like terms to get the resultant polynomial expression:

[tex]7x^2-4x+6-(x^2+2x+1)=7x^2-4x+6-x^2-2x-1=7x^2-x^2-4x-2x+6-1=6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Then the resultant polynomial is: [tex]6x^2-6x+5[/tex]

Answer:

368

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to claim that there is a significant relationship between x and y.

P-value = 0.003.

Step-by-step explanation:

If we perform a regression analysis relating x and y, we get the best fitting line with equation:

[tex]y=15.82x+92.9[/tex]

and a correlation coefficient r:

[tex]r=0.693[/tex]

We have to test the hypothesis, where the alternative hypothesis claims that there is a relationship between these two variables, and the null hypothesis claiming there is no relationship (meaning that the correlation is not significantly different from 0).

This can be written as:

[tex]H_0: \rho=0\\\\H_a:\rho\neq0[/tex]

where ρ is the population correlation coefficient for x and y.

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample size is n=16.

The degrees of freedom are df=14.

[tex]df=n-2=16-2=14[/tex]

The test statistic can be calculated as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{r\sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}=\dfrac{0.693\sqrt{14}}{\sqrt{1-(0.693)^2}}=\dfrac{2.593}{0.721}=3.597[/tex]

For a test statistic t=2.05 and 14 degrees of freedom, the P-value is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>3.597)=0.003[/tex]

The P-value (0.003) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant enough.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to claim that there is a significant relationship between x and y.

Answer is 5 calories/min

75 divided by 15 is 5

Answer:five cal per min.15 in five groups equals ''75''

Answer:

All the elements in the sample share a common characteristic. All of them read the magazine, so we may have a biased sample. And we also have the bias of the fact that only the volunteers will respond to this survey, so this is a biased sample.

This type of sample is usually called convenience sampling, where the elements in the sample are the most readily available (and what is most readily available for a magazine than its own readers?)

Then the type of sample is a convenience sample and a biased sample.

Answer:

9.52% probability of getting both candies green

Step-by-step explanation:

A probability is the number of desired outcomes divided by the number of total outcomes.

The order in which the candies are selected is not important. They are also selected without replacement. So we use the combinations formula to solve this question.

Combinations formula:

[tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

Find the probability of getting both candies green

Desired outcomes:

2 green, from a set of 5. So

[tex]D = C_{5,2} = \frac{5!}{2!3!} = 10[/tex]

Total outcomes:

2 from a set of 4+5+6 = 15. So

[tex]T = C_{15,2} = \frac{15!}{2!13!} = 105[/tex]

Probability:

[tex]p = \frac{D}{T} = \frac{10}{105} = 0.0952[/tex]

9.52% probability of getting both candies green

Answer:

.86602 a

.707106 b

.577355 c

Step-by-step explanation:

entered itno calculator

Answer: LIKLEY

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula : Probability [tex]=\dfrac{\text{Number of favorable outcomes}}{\text{Total outcomes}}[/tex]

A standard cube has six numbers on it (1,2,3,4,5 and 6).

P( NOT 6) =[tex]\dfrac{\text{Numbers that are not 6}}{\text{Total numbers}}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{5}{6}=0.8333[/tex]

We know that when the probability of any event lies between 0.5 and 1then the event is said to be likely to happen.

Since , P(not 6)=0.8333 which lies between 0 and 0.5.

That means, it is likely to happen.

Note :

When probability of having A = 0 , we call A as uncertain event.

When probability of having A = 1 , we call A as certain event.

When probability of having A = 0.5 , we call A as equally likely event.

When probability of having A lies between 0 and 0.5 , we call A as unlikely event.

When probability of having A lies between 0.5 and 1 , we call A as likely event.

Answer:

157.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Use PEMDAS! In this rule, it is stated that we should always add/subtract before multiplying/dividing. Also, whatever you do on one side of an equation, you do to another. Therefore, in order to get rid of the -2/5, add 2/5 so we can get rid of it. We also (according to the rule), have to add it to the other side in order to balance out. So add the 2/5 to 39. Then the other side is now 39.4. Now we have to get x by itself. Divide both sides by 1/4 (or multiply by 4 on both sides) in order to get x=157.6

Answer:

a) The CDF of X/Y is calculated as:

[tex]F_{z} (\zeta) = \frac{\zeta}{\zeta + 2}[/tex] for [tex]0 < \zeta < \infty[/tex]  

[tex]F_{z} (\zeta) = 0[/tex] for [tex]\zeta \leq 0[/tex]

Note: Z = X/Y

b) Probability that A finishes before B = 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

For clarity and easiness of expression, this solution is handwritten and attached as a file. Check the complete solution in the attached file.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between:

10 and 4: 1.492

10 and 20: 2.055

13 and 4: 2.577

13 and 20: 2.226

The R code:

#Convert your datafile into csv and make sure your row names are 10,13,4 and 20

data=read.csv(file.choose())

data

row.names(data)=c(10,13,4,20)

data

d=dist(data,method="euclidean")

d

fit=hclust(d,method="complete")

plot(fit)

groups=cutree(fit,k=2)

rect.hclust(fit,k=2,border="red")