n this excerpt, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explains his ruling in Schenck v. United States. What argument is Holmes making about personal rights and free speech?

The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
–Schenck v. United State
Responses

The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.

The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.

The constitutional protection of free speech is absolute, and each person has a right to express his or herself however he or she wishes.

Option (b), Religious discord between Catholics and Protestants was the main cause of war in Saint-Domingue.

Conflicts broke out throughout the Catholic states of Europe, or Christendom, after the Protestant Reformation began in 1517, upending the region's ecclesiastical and political order. Other causes of the wars were rebellion, territorial claims, and conflicts between great countries.

Henry IV, a Protestant king (reigned 1589–1610) who converted to Catholicism for the sake of peace, ended the French Wars of Religion (1562–1998; a total of eight conflicts between Protestant and Catholic parties in France during a 36-year period).

Catholics, who considered themselves as protectors of the genuine faith, and French Protestants, who desired the freedom to follow their religion, first engaged in battle. The battle among French nobility for the king's favor was another aspect of politics that drove the disputes.

Learn more about Protestant Reformation: https://brainly.com/question/2973841

#SPJ1

Buddhism was introduced into China from India during the Han Dynasty (206 BC - 220 AD), although its roots can be traced back to the 4th century BC.

Buddhism was first introduced to China by a missionary monk named Lokaksema, who was sent to China by the ruler of the Kushan Empire in Central Asia. He translated Buddhist texts into Chinese and established the first Buddhist temple in modern-day Luoyang. During the Han Dynasty, Buddhism began to spread and gain acceptance among the Chinese people.

Emperor Ming (58-75 AD) was one of the first Chinese rulers to embrace Buddhism and even erected temples in his honor. Buddhism then continued to spread throughout China during the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD) and reached its peak during the Song Dynasty (960-1279 AD). During this time, Buddhist philosophy and teachings greatly influenced Chinese culture and art, and many famous Chinese poets, such as Su Shi and Li Bai, wrote about Buddhism in their works. Today, Buddhism is still one of the major religions in China and is practiced by millions of Chinese people.

To know more about Buddhism , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31418351

#SPJ4

Social tension was increased by the scopes trial is Modernist vs. Traditional. The correct option is A.

The Scopes Trial, also known as the "Monkey Trial," was a highly publicized court case that took place in 1925 in Dayton, Tennessee. John Scopes, a high school science teacher, was accused of violating Tennessee's Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in public schools.

The trial pitted modernists, who believed in the importance of science and reason, against traditionalists, who were primarily religious and believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. The trial became a symbol of the cultural conflict between science and religion in the United States.

The trial also highlighted the growing divide between urban and rural areas in the country. Many urban areas were more accepting of modern ideas and scientific progress, while rural areas tended to be more traditional and conservative.

In the end, John Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, but the trial helped to bring the issue of evolution and science education to national attention. It also marked a turning point in the debate between modernism and traditionalism in American society.

Learn more about Social tension here:

https://brainly.com/question/18375992

#SPJ4

Answer: Well first off, Canadian money is worth more, so for example, 2 dollars in the U.S. would be like 3 in Canada (not actually that's just an example) I wouldn't say it's a difference in living standard just a currency worth difference.

Explanation:

It took several decades for the population of the Middle Colonies to reach 10,000, with the majority of settlers being English. The region's growth was driven by new settlers and the development of agricultural and commercial industries.

The Middle Colonies, which encompassed the areas that would later become the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, saw steady growth in population after their establishment in the early 17th century. However, it took several decades for the population to reach 10,000.

In 1630, the population of the Middle Colonies was estimated to be around 1,000, with most of the settlers being Dutch and Swedish. By 1650, the population had grown to an estimated 9,000, with the majority of the settlers being English.

It was not until the mid-1660s that the population of the Middle Colonies reached 10,000. This was partly due to the influx of new settlers from England, Scotland, and Ireland, as well as the growth of the region's agricultural and commercial industries. The population continued to grow steadily in the following decades, with the region becoming one of the most populous and prosperous in colonial America by the mid-18th century.

To learn more about Middle Colonies

https://brainly.com/question/18021081

#SPJ4

The lawmakers who opposed the USA PATRIOT Act were concerned that it could result in violations of citizens' constitutional rights.

The USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act), passed by the US Congress in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks, was designed to give law enforcement greater powers to investigate and prevent acts of terrorism. Some lawmakers, however, opposed the law because they believed it could result in violations of citizens' constitutional rights.

Specifically, critics argued that the USA PATRIOT Act granted law enforcement agencies overly broad powers to conduct surveillance, search homes and offices, and access personal records without obtaining a warrant. They also raised concerns about the government's ability to monitor communications, such as phone calls and emails, without sufficient judicial oversight.

Opponents of the law argued that these provisions violated citizens' Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. They also expressed concern about the potential for abuse, arguing that the lack of clear guidelines for law enforcement could lead to arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement of the law.

Despite these criticisms, the USA PATRIOT Act was ultimately signed into law in October 2001 and has been renewed several times since then. While some of the more controversial provisions of the law have been amended or limited, the debate over the balance between national security and civil liberties continues to this day.

To learn more about the USA PATRIOT ACT, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/11441991

#SPJ11

One quotation that best supports an important theme of the story "The Canoe Breaker" by Margaret Bemister is "We all have to make choices in life, and sometimes those choices lead us down paths we never thought we’d take." This quotation highlights the theme of decision-making and its consequences.

Throughout the story, the protagonist, Keely, makes decisions that lead to both positive and negative outcomes. Her choice to help her grandfather build the canoe leads to a deeper understanding of her heritage and strengthens their relationship.

However, her decision to steal the canoe leads to guilt and a strained relationship with her grandfather. This theme of decision-making reminds readers that their choices have consequences and they must weigh the outcomes carefully.

To know more about Margaret Bemister, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/15302126#

#SPJ11

Which quotation best supports an important theme of the story from the canoe breaker by margaret bemister

“He had gone forth in battle, hoping to kill some powerful enemy, but no one had fallen

under his tomahawk.”

B “Seizing his tomahawk, he began to break the canoes, and soon had a hole made in all of

them except one.”

C “The Indians lifted the body of the young man, carried it to a clump of pine-trees and laid

it down.”

D.We all have to make choices in life, and sometimes those choices lead us down paths we never thought we’d take

Although the Middle Ages are frequently associated with knights, castles, and rulers, they were also a period of significant cultural and intellectual progress in areas like philosophy, literature, and art.

The period of European history from the fifth to the fifteenth centuries is referred to as the Middle Ages, often known as the Medieval period. The fall of the Roman Empire, the rise of feudalism, the spread of Christianity, and the expansion of trade and commerce are its defining features.

You might be curious to know more about the many social classes that made up medieval civilization as a time traveler. Four social classes will be looked at in this manual: the serf, merchant and craftsman, noble, and ruling classes.

The lowest social and economic class was the serf. They were regarded as the lord's property and were considered to be peasants who were confined to the land they farmed. Their lives were influenced by their possession status and immobility. They spent a lot of time in the fields working, leaving little time for recreation. Despite their status, serfs were an integral part of medieval civilization since they supplied the work required to keep the economy running.

On the other hand, the merchant and craftsman classes occupied a greater standing in society. They were talented laborers who made pottery, metallurgy, and textiles, among other products. The movement and exchange of these products were handled by merchants. With their profession and craft, this class was able to amass wealth and raise their social standing. Yet, they were not regarded as belonging to the noble class and were not granted the same benefits.

In medieval civilization, the aristocratic class possessed a tremendous amount of influence. They were affluent landowners with titles like baron, earl, and duke. They could live in lavish castles and take advantage of the perks of their position because of their riches and prestige.

They were in charge of safeguarding both the inhabitants and their territories. Yet, enormous authority also came with great responsibility, and they were supposed to uphold the king's honor and fight for him in times of conflict.

Lastly, the monarchy, or ruling class, had the highest place in society. These were the kings and queens in charge of the many European kingdoms. They were in charge of upholding law and order in their respective domains and had unrestricted power. They possessed the authority to declare war and make crucial choices that would influence their populace.

In conclusion, the social and economic structure of medieval civilization was hierarchical, with each social group maintaining a certain position.

This groups' status, privileges, and the expectations and duties that went along with it all had an impact on how they lived. It is crucial for a time traveler to comprehend these variations and appreciate the complexity of medieval existence.

To know more about middle age, visit:

brainly.com/question/26586178

#SPJ1

The cashier in the passage is part of the household element in the circular flow of goods. The correct answer is option c.

The household element represents individuals and families who consume goods and services and provide resources in the form of labor, capital, and land.

In this case, the cashier is using her wages to purchase groceries and pay bills, which is a form of consumption. She is also providing her labor as a resource to the business, which is the supermarket. The supermarket, in turn, is part of the product market element, which is where goods and services are bought and sold.

The local restaurants that purchase vegetables from the supermarket are also part of the product market, as they are buying goods to use in their own businesses. Overall, the circular flow of goods illustrates how households, businesses, and product markets are interconnected and interdependent.

To know more about circular flow refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/28494347

#SPJ11

A soccer squad raised $2074.75 to attend a tournament. They spent $1093. 50 on a bus rental and $39. 25 each player on food. The team may bring up to 25 players.

A football team is a group of players who have been chosen to play together in the various football team sports.

Let the number of players to be taken be x,

Total budget = $2074.75

Bus rental = $ 1093.50

Each player on food = $ 39.25

According to given conditions, the equation will be:

Total budget = bus rental + ( number of players × food on each player)

2074.75 = 1093.50 + ( 39.25 × x)

2074.75 - 1093.50 = 39.25x

981.25 = 39.25x

x = 981.25 / 39.25

x = 25.

Hence, the number of players which can be taken is 25.

To know more about equations:

https://brainly.com/question/14686792

#SPJ4

The difference in ethnic characteristics in the 2011 platform compared to the 1991 program is called genetic ancestry

Genetic ancestry is the study of a person's DNA to identify their racial or ancestral heritage. It is predicated on the notion that specific genetic variations are more prevalent in particular populations, and that by examining a person's DNA, it is possible to ascertain the proportion of their ancestry that originated in various geographical regions.

This kind of analysis is frequently employed in population genetics, human evolution, and migration studies as well as in genealogy and private ancestry testing. It is important to remember that a person's genetic heritage is only one aspect of their identity and does not always correspond with their cultural or social identities or sense of self.

To know more about   genetic ancestry    here

https://brainly.com/question/23956561

#SPJ4

The mass movement of people from rural areas to urban areas due to better farming techniques, new inventions, and the beginning of enclosures is referred to as urbanization.

Urbanization is a term used to describe the process of the population shifting from rural to urban areas. It is often associated with industrialization and the growth of cities.

The rise of industrialization in the late 19th and early 20th centuries brought about significant changes in urban areas, including the creation of new industries, transportation systems, and housing.

These changes led to an increase in the number of people living in urban areas, as people were drawn to the opportunities offered by cities. Urbanization has continued to be a global trend, with more and more people moving to cities in search of better jobs and higher living standards.

To know more about urbanization visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29987047

#SPJ11

Trench warfare and new weapons, including poison gas, caused high casualties. The Spanish flu outbreak also contributed to the death toll.

WWI turned into the deadliest conflict in history up to that point because of a few elements, including close quarters conflict and the presentation of new sorts of weapons, for example, automatic rifles, tanks, and toxin gas. The utilization of these weapons prompted high losses, as warriors were frequently caught in channels and presented to gas goes after dangerous. Moreover, the flare-up of dangerous sicknesses like the Spanish influenza further added to the loss of life, as fighters and regular citizens the same were contaminated and kicked the bucket en masse. Enormous starvations were not a critical figure the conflict, in spite of the fact that they happened in certain region because of the contention.

To learn more about Trench Warfare, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/18907228

#SPJ4

Research and knowledge have shown that mixed-neuter training maybe effective and beneficial for military parts.

Gender-joined training can help to break down common barriers and advance equality within the military. Moreover, the report made by General Glynn appears to ignore the fact that mothers have been serving in the military for decades and have showed their capabilities in combat parts.

In conclusion, General James F. Glynn's assertion that "Anything outside of this unknown" is not a genuine rationale for claiming gender segregation in detachment training. Rather, assorted-gender training maybe effective and beneficial for military parts, and others.

Learn more about segregation  from

https://brainly.com/question/1574751

#SPJ1

Explanation: Several major revelations and egregious presidential actions obstructing the investigation later in 1973 prompted the House to commence an impeachment process against Nixon. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Nixon had to release the Oval Office tapes to government investigators.

Construction of the Transcontinental Railroad;  Gold Rush ;The Oregon Trail; The Mexican-American War;  The concept of Manifest Destiny are the five important developments of manifest era.

1. Construction of the Transcontinental Railroad: Although it greatly contributed to westward expansion and economic growth, other factors played more significant roles in shaping the era.

2. Gold Rush of 1849: The Gold Rush attracted thousands of people to California, accelerating westward expansion and statehood, but it had a more localized impact compared to other developments.

3. The Oregon Trail: This westward migration route was vital for pioneers to reach the fertile lands of the West, but it ranks lower because it was primarily a means to achieve Manifest Destiny rather than a driving force.

4. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848): This war resulted in the U.S. acquiring vast territories, such as California and Texas, which played a significant role in achieving Manifest Destiny. It ranks higher due to its direct impact on territorial expansion.

5. The concept of Manifest Destiny itself: This belief that the U.S. was destined to expand across the continent played the most important role in shaping the era. It drove the nation's policies, territorial acquisitions, and mindset, ultimately resulting in the United States' expansion from coast to coast.

To know more about Oregon Trail visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26139536

#SPJ11

Nationalist attitudes and feelings can often promote conflict due to their emphasis on a particular group's interests, identity, and pride over others.

Nationalism can lead to the belief that one's own nation is superior to others, leading to feelings of superiority and prejudice towards other groups. This can create tensions between different groups, leading to conflicts that may escalate into violence.

Furthermore, when nationalism is combined with a sense of grievance or historical injustice, it can become even more dangerous. Nationalist groups may view their cause as a moral imperative, leading to the justification of violent actions to achieve their goals.

This can create a cycle of violence and retaliation between different nationalist groups, as each side seeks to protect its interests and preserve its identity.

Additionally, nationalism can exacerbate pre-existing social and political tensions. It can create an "us vs. them" mentality, leading to the demonization of other groups and making it difficult for people to compromise or find common ground. This can make conflicts more difficult to resolve peacefully and increase the likelihood of violence.

In summary, while nationalism can be a source of pride and unity, it can also be a divisive force that promotes conflict between different groups. It is essential to recognize the dangers of nationalist attitudes and work towards promoting understanding, tolerance, and cooperation between different groups to prevent conflicts from escalating.

To know more about Nationalist refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/3545142#

#SPJ11

The United States tried to get Abel to talk at first by offering him a deal in exchange for information.

They told him that if he cooperated and gave them valuable information, they would give him a lighter sentence or even let him go free. However, Abel refused to betray his country and remained loyal to the Soviet Union.

The United States' initial approach in trying to get Abel to talk was through coercion and incentivization. They hoped that by offering him a deal, he would be more likely to divulge valuable information. This tactic is often used in interrogations and negotiations to elicit cooperation from the other party.

However, in Abel's case, he remained steadfast in his loyalty to the Soviet Union and refused to betray his country. This highlights the importance of personal values and principles in decision-making, even in high-pressure situations.

To know more about Soviet Union click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/10173240#

#SPJ11

All throughout his life, Samuel heard from the Lord. Then, according to Samuel 3:4, the Lord called Samuel. The author of the book of Samuel notes that throughout this time, visions and direct revelations from God were rare. Samuel, however, began to hear from God.

The advice to "be strong and courageous and finish the assignment" was also given to Solomon, King David's son. Remember that you are in the presence of the LORD God, my God, and not to be frightened or discouraged. He won't let you down or abandon you until all the work has been finished for the worship of the LORD's temple.

Promises of wisdom, prosperity, honor, and a long life would be fulfilled for Solomon provided he continued to live uprightly before the Lord. The promise held true. Throughout the course of his life, Solomon became famous for his wisdom.

Israel and Judah were united by David to form a strong Jewish dominion. He killed the Philistine giant Goliath with a slingshot and a stone, as recorded in the Torah. The authorship of several of the Psalms in the Hebrew Bible is attributed to David. David was a poet and musician. Solomon built the majestic First Temple in Jerusalem.

Learn more about Temple in Jerusalem: https://brainly.com/question/11487124

#SPJ1

The House of Wisdom was C. a research library in Baghdad

In Iraq's Baghdad during the lasting Islamic Golden Age from 9th to 10th century, the House of Wisdom was a centrality that stood out as a beacon of intellectualism.

Created and established by Abbasid Calpih Harun al-Rashid in the 8th Century to help collect, translate, and upkeep both Greek, Persian, and other cultures' knowledge; Housed not only an archive, but also existing as a foundation for research and education where specialists from broad fields like astronomy, mathematics, medicine, logic reasoning, poetry, and more contributed their part in uplifting knowledge combinations toward enlightenment and learning proactively.

Find out more on the House of Wisdom at https://brainly.com/question/3118989

#SPJ1

It is possible that bands and tribes did not come before chiefdoms in some cases due to a variety of factors including environmental, political, and social influences.

For example, if a region lacked resources or experienced high levels of conflict, bands and tribes may have been unable to form due to a lack of safety or food. Additionally, if a region was particularly centralized or had a powerful leader, tribes and bands may have been unable to form due to the power of the leader. In these cases, chiefdoms could have been established without the need for bands and tribes.

Settlement patterns are spatial arrangements of human settlements, which can be recognized and studied through archaeological evidence. Settlement patterns can provide archaeologists with valuable information on the culture, technology, economy, and social organization of past societies.

They can reveal the size and layout of settlements, the type of housing, how the people interacted with their landscape, and the relationship between settlements and other features such as roads, monuments, and burial sites. By studying settlement patterns, archaeologists can learn about how people lived, how they interacted with each other, and how their environment shaped their lives.

To know more about tribe, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17086100

#SPJ4

Alliances not only enhanced the size of the conflict but also decided which parties would join in combat when it began. Early on, the alliance structure caused friction between the two groups.

Germany's invasion of Poland on September 1 directly led to the Anglo-French declaration of war against Germany on September 3. The Soviet Union also took part in Germany's invasion of Poland on September 17.

The formation of the Nazi Party in Germany and the start of a second "world war" just 20 years later were results of the humiliation of defeat and the 1919 peace treaty, respectively. Germany was forced under the accord to give up 13% of its pre-war possessions, demilitarize the Rhineland, and pay significant compensation.

For the United States of America, World War II was the most recent "Good War." This expression gained wider acceptance with the beginning of conflicts in nations like Vietnam and Korea, which the American people thought were extremely unpopular.

It is common to refer to World War II as the "good war" despite its cruelty. Disputes involving authoritarian nations like Germany, Italy, and Japan and democratic nations like the US and the UK are to blame. The Allies won the war, which lasted around six years between 1939 to 1945.

Learn more about democratic nations: https://brainly.com/question/4295861

#SPJ1

The advantage that Nazis gain from putting Jews in ghettos was they used them as cheap labor to create war materials like weapons.

After the Nazis conquered territory in Europe they send Jews people to live in ghettos. Ghettos are some urban areas where minorities live.

During the Holocaust, for the ultimate destruction of European Jews, Nazis forced them to live in ghettos. Not only this they took many advantages of people living in ghettos.

Nazis used them as their workers and use to pay less to them. There was no fixed time of working and brutal behavior was done with them.

Learn more about Jews Ghettos:

https://brainly.com/question/858475

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

What economic advantage did the Nazis gain from putting Jews in ghettos?

The government spent less money on health care for its citizens.

The government used them as cheap labor to create war materials.

The government could train young Jewish men to become soldiers.

The government had less need to deport Jews to other countries.

The type of metamorphism likely in the area with the given geographic coordinates is regional metamorphism.

This is because the region is characterized by a large range of latitudes and longitudes, and the presence of different rock types at various depths, which can cause changes in mineralogy, texture, and other physical properties due to the application of heat, pressure, and fluid flow.

Regional metamorphism is common in areas where rocks are subjected to long-term tectonic processes, such as the collision of tectonic plates or the movement of magma beneath the Earth's surface.  

Learn more about metamorphism

https://brainly.com/question/1366827

#SPJ4

Chapter 2 of Tom Bower's "Oil Money, Politics and Power in the 21st Century" focuses on the rise of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the impact of their actions on the global oil market.

Bower provides a detailed history of OPEC, tracing its origins back to the 1960s and the formation of a group of oil-producing nations that sought to control the price of oil.

The chapter explores how OPEC's decision to cut oil production in 1973 led to a global oil crisis and a period of economic turmoil. Bower argues that OPEC's actions were motivated by a desire to gain political power and influence, as well as to protect their oil resources and maintain their dominance in the global oil market.

Bower also examines the role of Saudi Arabia within OPEC and the broader oil industry. He describes the close relationship between the Saudi royal family and the American government, and how this has influenced the global oil market. He argues that Saudi Arabia has used its position within OPEC to exert political influence and further its own interests, often at the expense of other oil-producing nations.

Overall, Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive overview of the history of OPEC and its impact on the global oil market. Bower's writing is clear and engaging, and he uses a wide range of sources to support his arguments. The chapter is essential reading for anyone interested in the politics of the global oil industry.

To know more about OPEC refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30143768

#SPJ11

Answer extending voting rights to the common man.

Explanation:

Great Britain didn't give Indian elites higher positions due to their belief in their own racial and cultural superiority, their policy of divide and rule, and fear of Indian elites challenging their authority.

Great Britain did not give Indian elites higher positions in the military or civilian life due to a combination of factors. First, the British believed in their own racial and cultural superiority, and saw the Indians as inferior and untrustworthy. They did not want to relinquish control to the Indian elites, whom they saw as potential threats to their authority.

Second, the British had a policy of divide and rule, in which they intentionally created divisions among different groups in India to maintain their power. They did not want to give too much power to any one group, including the Indian elites, for fear of upsetting the delicate balance of power they had established.

Third, the British believed that the Indian elites were not sufficiently loyal to the British crown, and could potentially undermine British interests in India. They therefore sought to keep the Indian elites at arm's length, denying them the opportunities for advancement that would have allowed them to challenge British authority.

Finally, the British believed that it was their duty to civilize and modernize India, and saw themselves as superior to the Indian elites. They believed that they could not trust the Indians to govern themselves or run the country, and therefore sought to maintain control over all aspects of Indian life.

In conclusion, Great Britain did not give Indian elites higher positions in the military or civilian life due to a combination of factors, including their belief in racial and cultural superiority, their policy of divide and rule, their fear of Indian elites challenging their authority, and their belief in their duty to civilize and modernize India.

To learn more about Indian elites refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/9398768

#SPJ11