Keisha used a photo that measured 4 inches by 6 inches to make a copy that measured 8 inches by 12 inches. What is the
scale factor of the dilation? Write your answer as a whole number or a decimal.

Three pairs of negative x- and y-coordinates that lie on the line y = 3x + 4:

1. x = -2, y = -2

2. x = -3, y = --5

3. x = -5, y = -11

Here are three pairs of negative x- and y-coordinates that lie on the line y = 3x + 4:

1. x = -2, y = -2:

When x is -2, y = 3(-2) + 4 = -6 + 4 = -2. So the point (-2, -2) lies on the line y = 3x + 4.

2. x = -3, y = -5:

When x is -3, y = 3(-3) + 4 = -9 + 4 = -5. So the point (-3, -5) lies on the line y = 3x + 4.

3. x = -5, y = -11:

When x is -5, y = 3(-5) + 4 = -15 + 4 = -11. So the point (-5, -11) lies on the line y = 3x + 4.

In all three pairs of coordinates, the x-coordinate is negative, and the corresponding y-coordinate is also negative, and they all satisfy the equation y = 3x + 4.

To learn more about coordinate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ1

The variance of the given set of data 1010, 1005, 1020, 1025, and 1030 is equal to 107.5.

Set of the data is equal to,

1010, 1005, 1020, 1025, and 1030

Use the formula of variance,

Variance = (sum of (data point - mean)^2) / (number of data points - 1)

Mean

= (1010 + 1005 + 1020 + 1025 + 1030) / 5

= 1018

Calculate the deviations for each data points,

deviation of 1010

= 1010 - 1018

= -8

deviation of 1005

= 1005 - 1018

= -13

deviation of 1020

= 1020 - 1018

= 2

deviation of 1025

= 1025 - 1018

= 7

deviation of 1030

= 1030 - 1018

= 12

Square the deviations we get,

(-8)^2 = 64

(-13)^2 = 169

2^2 = 4

7^2 = 49

12^2 = 144

Add all the squared deviations we have,

= 64 + 169 + 4 + 49 + 144

= 430

Variance of the data set is equal to

= 430 / ( 5 - 1 )

= 430 / 4

= 107.5

Therefore, the variance of the set of data is 107.5.

Learn more about variance here

brainly.com/question/29166326

#SPJ4

The zeros and the multiplicities are x = 0 with a multiplicity of 1, x = 1 with a multiplicity of 6 and x = 2/5 with a multiplicity of 3

The equation from the question is given as

f(x)= 3x(x-1)^6 (5x+2)^3

To calculate the zeros, we set each factor to 0

So, we have

3x = 0

(x - 1)^6 = 0

(5x + 2)^3 = 0

When evaluated, we have

x = 0

x = 1

x = -2/3

The multiplicities are the powers of the factors

So, we have the following results

Read more about polynomial at

https://brainly.com/question/7693326

#SPJ1

The probability of selecting 4 red marbles out of the bag is approximately 0.0303, or 3.03%.

To find the probability of selecting 4 red marbles out of a bag containing 6 red, 4 blue, and 2 white marbles, we first need to determine the total number of possible combinations of 4 marbles that can be selected from the bag. This can be calculated using the formula for combinations, which is:
[tex]nC_{r}=    \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)}[/tex]

where n is the total number of items in the set, and r is the number of items being chosen. In this case, we have:

n = 12 (6 red + 4 blue + 2 white)
r = 4 (the number of marbles being chosen)

So the total number of possible combinations is:

[tex]12C_{4}=    \frac{12!}{(4!8!)} = 495[/tex]

Next, we need to determine the number of combinations that contain 4 red marbles. Since there are 6 red marbles in the bag, the number of ways to choose 4 of them is:

[tex]6C_{4}=    \frac{6!}{(4!2!)} = 15[/tex]

Therefore, the probability of selecting 4 red marbles out of the bag is:

[tex]p( 4 red) = \frac{15}{495}=\frac{1}{33}[/tex]

So the probability of selecting 4 red marbles out of the bag is approximately 0.0303, or 3.03%.

To know more about "Probability" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: c

Step-by-step explanation:

131.5 inches

I do flvs!!

The probability that a person is a man given that they have high blood pressure is  0.46 or 46%. 

We are given that there are 123 ladies and 178 men within the bunch of volunteers for a clinical trial, and 54 of the ladies and 46 of the men have tall blood weights.

We are inquired to discover the likelihood that an arbitrarily selected volunteer who has a tall blood weight may be a man.

Let M be the occasion that a volunteer could be a man,

and H be the occasion that a volunteer has a tall blood weight.

We need to discover P(M|H), the likelihood that a volunteer could be a man given that they have tall blood weight.

By Bayes' hypothesis, we have:

P(M|H) = P(H|M) * P(M) / P(H)

Ready to find the probabilities on the right-hand side of this condition as taken after

P(H|M) = 46/178, the likelihood that a man has a tall blood weight

P(M) = 178/(123+178), the likelihood that a volunteer may be a man

P(H) = (54+46)/(123+178), the likelihood that a volunteer has tall blood weight

Substituting these values into the condition, we get:

P(M|H) = (46/178) * (178/(123+178)) / ((54+46)/(123+178))

P(M|H) =  46/100

P(M|H) = 0.46

Therefore, the likelihood that a haphazardly(randomly) chosen volunteer who has high blood weight could be a man is 0.46 or 46%. 

To know  more about probability refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ4

The professor needs to sample at least 929 high school students to estimate the proportion of students enrolled in college-level courses each school year with a 99% confidence level and a margin of error of 3.5%.

To determine the necessary sample size for estimating the proportion of high school students enrolled in college-level courses each school year with a 99% confidence level and a margin of error of 3.5%, we can use the formula:

n = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E²

where n is the sample size, Z is the Z-score for the desired confidence level (2.576 for 99%), p is the estimated proportion from the previous study (18.3% or 0.183 as a decimal), and E is the margin of error (0.035 or 3.5% as a decimal).

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

n = (2.576² * 0.183 * (1-0.183)) / 0.035²

n = 928.62

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a sample size of 929.

Know more about margin of error here:

https://brainly.com/question/29101642

#SPJ11

The value of h(4) is 21.

To find the value of h(4) for the given function [tex]h(t)=t^{2}-t+9[/tex], follow these steps:

Step 1: Replace 't' with '4' in the function:
[tex]h(4)=4^{2}-4+9[/tex]

Step 2: Evaluate the expression:
h(4) = 16 - 4 + 9

Step 3: Simplify:
h(4) = 12 + 9

Step 4: Calculate the final result:
h(4) = 21

So, the value of h(4) is 21.

To know more about "Function" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29162580#

#SPJ11

The five-number summary for this dataset is: 34, 39, 51, 73, 79. This can be answered by the concept from Sets.

The five-number summary for this dataset can be calculated as follows:

1. Minimum: The smallest number in the dataset is 34.
2. First quartile (Q1): To find Q1, we need to calculate the median of the lower half of the dataset. So, we first need to order the numbers from smallest to largest: 34 36 39 43 51 53 62 63 73 79. The median of the lower half (i.e. the first five numbers) is 39. Therefore, Q1 is 39.
3. Median (Q2): To find the median, we again need to order the numbers from smallest to largest: 34 36 39 43 51 53 62 63 73 79. The median is the middle number, which is 51.
4. Third quartile (Q3): To find Q3, we need to calculate the median of the upper half of the dataset. So, we first need to order the numbers from smallest to largest: 34 36 39 43 51 53 62 63 73 79. The median of the upper half (i.e. the last five numbers) is 73. Therefore, Q3 is 73.
5. Maximum: The largest number in the dataset is 79.

Therefore, the five-number summary for this dataset is: 34, 39, 51, 73, 79.

To learn more about Sets here:

brainly.com/question/18877365#

#SPJ11

Answer: D) option

Step-by-step explanation: triangle AHL is similar to triangle NKG.

The equation for the for the graph in picture is

The graph of a trigonometric function is known as a trigonometric graph.

We should apply the equation for the generic sine graph since we wish to determine the equation of the graph.

y = A sin (Bx + C) + D

where:

B = 2π/T, where T is the period, and

A is the amplitude.

A = [absolute maximum - absolute minimum]/2

A = [2.5 - 1.5] / 2

A = 1/2

B = 2π/T

where T = π (from  the graph)

B = 2π/T

B = 2π/(π)

B = 2

C = 0

D = vertical shift = -2

We then substitute into y, thus

y = A sin (Bx + C) + D

y = 1/2 sin 2x - 2

Learn more about trigonometric graph here:

brainly.com/question/29718746

#SPJ1

a. The 90% confidence interval for the calories within a Breakfast Baconator is (746.77, 763.23).

b. The 95% confidence interval for the calories within a Breakfast Baconator is (743.09, 767.91).

c. The 95% confidence interval for the weight of prawns with a sample size of 50 cannot be determined as we do not have information on the population of prawns.

d. The 95% confidence interval for the weight of prawns with a sample size of 100 is wider than the interval for a sample size of 50.

e. As the sample size increases, the confidence interval becomes narrower and more precise as there is more data to make inferences about the population.

This is because a larger sample size reduces the effect of random variation and provides a more accurate representation of the population.

To know more about confidence interval click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29680703#

#SPJ11

The standard deviation of Y is $8.32.

Based on the given information, we can expect John's average commute time for the week to be 90 minutes. This is found by adding up the expected time for each individual day, which is 18 minutes per day.

For the second part of the question, we know that 100% - 25% - 60% = 15% of students do not buy any books for the class. The table provided represents part (b). The expectation for part (c) is the total on the line yiP(Y=yi), which we do not have enough information to calculate as we do not know the values of yi or P(Y=yi).

For part (d), we are given the variance of Y as $69.28. To find the standard deviation, we take the square root of the variance: √($69.28) = $8.32.

Therefore, the standard deviation of Y is $8.32.

To learn more about standard deviation here:

brainly.com/question/23907081#

#SPJ11

Given matrix A, to find matrix exponential e^(At) use Taylor series, but it's complex. Neither computing the series nor numerical methods directly provide the correct e^(At) due to infinite series, so none of the given options are correct.

The given matrix A is:

A = [ 3  0 ]
      [ 2  3 ]

To find the matrix exponential e^(At), we can use the Taylor series expansion:

e^(At) = I + At + (At)^2 / 2! + (At)^3 / 3! + ...

where I is the identity matrix and t is a scalar. However, calculating the matrix exponential using the Taylor series can be quite complex. In this case, you can either attempt to compute the series up to a certain order or use a numerical method to approximate the matrix exponential.

Unfortunately, none of the given options directly provides the correct e^(At) as the matrix exponential involves an infinite series of terms. So, the correct answer is:

e. None of the responses

Learn more about matrix here: brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf 2.5 \times 10^4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{2.3 \times 10^7}{9.2 \times 10^2}[/tex]

Using law of exponent:

[tex]\displaystyle = \frac{2.3 }{9.2} \times 10^{7-2}\\\\= 0.25 \times 10^5\\\\= 2.5 \times 10^4\\\\\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

To find the number of hours it takes for the size of the bacteria sample to double, we will use the given function:

y = y0 * e^(0.0623t)

Since we want to find the time when the number of bacteria doubles, we can rewrite the function as:

2y0 = y0 * e^(0.0623t)

Now, divide both sides by y0 to isolate the exponential term:

2 = e^(0.0623t)

Next, we need to solve for t. To do this, take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides:

ln(2) = ln(e^(0.0623t))

Using the logarithm property, ln(a^b) = b * ln(a), we get:

ln(2) = 0.0623t * ln(e)

Since ln(e) = 1, we have:

ln(2) = 0.0623t

Now, solve for t by dividing both sides by 0.0623:

t = ln(2) / 0.0623

Using a calculator, we get:

t ≈ 11.1 hours

So, it takes approximately 11.1 hours for the size of the bacteria sample to double.

Learn more about logarithm property here:

https://brainly.com/question/30226560

#SPJ11

The indefinite integral of f(x) + g(x) is: ∫[f(x) + g(x)] dx = ∫[tex]x^2[/tex] dx + ∫3x dx = (1/3)[tex]x^3[/tex] + (3/2)[tex]x^2[/tex]+ C where C is a constant of integration that combines the constants of integration from both integrals.

Using the linearity property of integration, we can split the integral into two parts:

∫[f(x) + g(x)] dx = ∫f(x) dx + ∫g(x) dx

Therefore, we have:

∫b a [f(x) + g(x)] dx = ∫b a f(x) dx + ∫b a g(x) dx

This means that we can find the indefinite integral of the sum of two functions by finding the indefinite integral of each function separately and adding them together.

For example, if we have f(x) = [tex]x^2[/tex] and g(x) = 3x, then we can find the indefinite integral of f(x) and g(x) separately:

∫[tex]x^2[/tex] dx = (1/3)[tex]x^3[/tex] + C₁

∫3x dx = (3/2)[tex]x^2[/tex] + C₂

where C₁ and C₂ are constants of integration.

Therefore, the indefinite integral of f(x) + g(x) is:

∫[f(x) + g(x)] dx = ∫[tex]x^2[/tex] dx + ∫3x dx = (1/3)x^3 + (3/2)[tex]x^2[/tex] + C

where C is a constant of integration that combines the constants of integration from both integrals.

In general, we can apply this method to find the indefinite integral of any sum of functions.

Learn more about  indefinite integral ,

https://brainly.com/question/29133144

#SPJ4

The supermarket receives $2.00 for each box of cereal purchased. For the second box, the price per unit volume is $3.

The sum of money needed to buy a good or service is its cost. It is the monetary value of products or services. Cost is the total amount spent to acquire a specific commodity or service. Cost can also be used to describe the sum of money spent on a specific project or activity. It is a measurement of the resources invested in acquiring a good or service, including the cost of the item itself, the labour involved, and other related costs. Cost is a crucial consideration when making business decisions since it determines how much a company will make or lose.

Comparison between the two cereal boxes is required to decide which one is the best investment. Both the cost and volume of each box must be considered in this comparison. V = lwh is the formula used to determine the volume of a rectangular prism, where l stands for length, w for width, and h for height.

The supermarket receives $2.00 for each box of cereal purchased.

Find the first half of each box's price:

2.00 x 0.50 = 1.00

Next, increase the starting price by the additional sum:

2.00 + 1.00 = $3.00

The second box is a superior purchase because its cost per unit volume is less than that of the first box's. The second box of cereal is less expensive per unit volume and delivers more volume than the first box. Therefore, buying the second box of cereal will help a buyer receive the most cereal for their money.

To know more about cost click-

brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ1

The complete question is,

a grocery store buys boxes of cereal for $ 2.00 each and sells them for 50% more. what does the grocery store charge its customers for each box of cereal?

Based on the sample results, we can estimate that approximately 105 students at Alejandro's school regularly bring their lunch.

To estimate the number of students at Alejandro's school who regularly bring their lunch based on the random sample, we can use the concept of proportion.

We know that Alejandro surveyed a random sample of 60 students, and out of those, 21 regularly bring their lunch. We can set up a proportion to estimate the number of students who regularly bring their lunch in the entire school.

Let's define:

x = Number of students who regularly bring their lunch in the entire school

Based on the proportion, we have:

21 students (sample) / 60 students (sample) = x students (entire school) / 300 students (entire school)

Cross-multiplying the proportion, we get:

21 × 300 = 60 × x

6300 = 60x

To solve for x, we divide both sides of the equation by 60:

x = 6300 / 60

x = 105

Therefore, based on the sample results, we can estimate that approximately 105 students at Alejandro's school regularly bring their lunch.

for such more question on random sample

https://brainly.com/question/16730693

#SPJ8

It is not necessary to know the number of successes to determine the mean of a binomial distribution. So the given statement is false.

The mean of a binomial distribution can be determined without knowing the number of successes involved in the problem. The mean of a binomial distribution is given by the product of the number of trials (n) and the probability of success on a single trial (p), denoted as np. This is a fixed value that represents the expected number of successes in a binomial distribution. The number of successes involved in the problem is not necessary to calculate the mean of a binomial distribution.

Therefore, it is not necessary to know the number of successes to determine the mean of a binomial distribution.

To learn more about binomial distribution here:

brainly.com/question/31197941#

#SPJ11

The test statistic t0 for a sample with n = 20, x = 7.5, s = 1.9, and if H1: μ < 8.3 is calculated to be  -1.886.

To calculate the test statistic t0, we can use the following formula:

t0 = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

where x is the sample mean, μ is the hypothesized population mean (in this case, 8.3), s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Given the values provided:

x = 7.5 (sample mean)

μ = 8.3 (hypothesized population mean)

s = 1.9 (sample standard deviation)

n = 20 (sample size)

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

t0 = (7.5 - 8.3) / (1.9 / √20)

t0 = -0.8 / (1.9 / √20)

t0 = -0.8 / (1.9 / 4.472) (rounded to three decimal places)

t0 = -0.8 / 0.424

t0 = -1.886 (rounded to three decimal places)

Therefore, the test statistic t0 is calculated to be -1.886.

To learn more about test statistic here:

brainly.com/question/14128303#

#SPJ11

V can be generated by fewer vectors (from S2) than the number of linearly independent vectors (in S1), which is not possible as every vector in V can be expressed as a linear combination of vectors in S2. True, S1 cannot contain more vectors than S2.

Suppose that V is a finite-dimensional vector space, S1 is a linearly independent subset of V, and S2 is a subset of V that generates V.

If S2 generates V, it means that every vector in V can be expressed as a linear combination of vectors in S2. In other words, the span of S2 is equal to V.

On the other hand, S1 is linearly independent, which means that no vector in S1 can be expressed as a linear combination of other vectors in S1.

Now, if S1 contains more vectors than S2, it means that the number of linearly independent vectors in S1 is greater than the number of vectors that generate V in S2.

But this would imply that V can be generated by fewer vectors (from S2) than the number of linearly independent vectors (in S1), which is not possible as every vector in V can be expressed as a linear combination of vectors in S2.

Therefore, S1 cannot contain more vectors than S2.

To learn more about vectors here:

brainly.com/question/13322477#

#SPJ11

(a) Using the power rule and the product rule, we can find that:
f'(x) = -1/x
(b) To find f'(e), we substitute e for x in the derivative we found in part a:
f'(e) = -1/e

The derivative of the given function f(x) = x - ln(x) - x, and then evaluate it at x = e.

a) To find f'(x), we'll take the derivative of each term in the function with respect to x:
f(x) = x - ln(x) - x

The derivative of x with respect to x is 1, and the derivative of -x is -1. To find the derivative of -ln(x), we use the chain rule. The derivative of ln(x) with respect to x is 1/x, so the derivative of -ln(x) is -1/x.

Combining these derivatives, we get:
f'(x) = 1 - 1/x - 1

b) Now, we'll find the value of f'(x) when x = e:
f'(e) = 1 - 1/e - 1

Simplifying the expression, we get:
f'(e) = 1 - (1 + e)/e

So, the answers are:
a) f'(x) = 1 - 1/x - 1
b) f'(e) = 1 - (1 + e)/e

Learn more about Derivative:

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

Triangle ABC is an equilateral triangle with all sides measuring 11cm in length.

An equilateral triangle is a type of triangle where all three sides are equal in length, and all three angles are equal, measuring 60 degrees each.

Length is a measurement of how long or extended an object or distance is, typically measured in units such as meters, centimeters, feet, or inches.

According to the given information:

Triangle ABC is an equilateral triangle. An equilateral triangle is a triangle with all sides equal in length. In this case, the given measurements state that all three sides of the triangle are 11cm in length, which meets the criteria for an equilateral triangle.

Equilateral triangles have several unique properties, including having all angles measuring 60 degrees, being a regular polygon, and having three lines of symmetry. Equilateral triangles also have the largest area for a given perimeter, making them useful in a variety of applications such as construction and engineering.

In summary, triangle ABC is an equilateral triangle with all sides measuring 11cm in length.

To know more about length and equilateral triangle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29098579

#SPJ1

The least squares estimator b2 is unbiased for the population parameter B2.

The least squares estimator b2 is consistent.

b2 has the smallest variance among all linear unbiased estimators of B2 and is the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) of the population parameter.

The Gauss-Markov theorem states

The linear regression model is correctly specified, and the error term has a mean of zero, constant variance, and is uncorrelated with the regressors, then the least squares estimator is the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) of the population parameters.

The least squares estimator has the smallest variance among all unbiased linear estimators.

To prove the Gauss-Markov theorem for the least squares estimator b2 of B2, we need to show that b2 is unbiased, consistent, and has the smallest variance among all linear unbiased estimators.

First, we can show that b2 is unbiased by taking the expected value of the least squares estimator:

[tex]E(b2) = E[(\Sigma(xi - \bar x)(yi - \bar y)) / \Sigma (xi - \bar x)2][/tex]

[tex]= E[\Sigma (xi - \bar x)(B2xi + Bi + ei - \bar y) / \Sigma (xi - \bar x)2][/tex]

[tex]= B2\Sigma(xi - \bar x)2 / \Sigma (xi - \bar x)2[/tex]

= B2

The least squares estimator b2 is unbiased for the population parameter B2.

b2 is consistent by showing that the variance of b2 approaches zero as the sample size approaches infinity.

This can be shown using the following formula for the variance of the least squares estimator:

[tex]Var(b2) = \sigma2 / \Sigma (xi - \bar x)2[/tex]

σ2 is the variance of the error term.

As the sample size n approaches infinity, the denominator [tex]\Sigma (xi - \bar x)2[/tex] also approaches infinity, causing Var(b2) to approach zero.

The least squares estimator b2 is consistent.

b2 has the smallest variance among all linear unbiased estimators. Suppose there is another linear unbiased estimator of B2, denoted as ẞ2.

Then we can write:

[tex]B2 = \Sigma aiyi[/tex]

where ai are constants. Since ẞ2 is unbiased, we have:

[tex]E(B2) = B2[/tex]

Taking the variance of both sides, we get:

[tex]Var(B2) = \Sigma a2i\sigma 2[/tex]

where σ2 is the variance of the error term. Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have:

[tex]Var(B 2) = \Sigma a2i\sigma 2 < = \Sigma b2i\sigma 2 = Var(b2)[/tex]

where [tex]bi = yi - \^b2xi[/tex] are the residuals, and the inequality follows from the fact that the sum of squared residuals[tex]\Sigma b2i[/tex] is minimized by the least squares estimator b2.

b2 has the smallest variance among all linear unbiased estimators of B2, and is the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) of the population parameter.

For similar questions on least squares

https://brainly.com/question/23305357

#SPJ11

The derivative of f(x) = kx + d is,

⇒ k.

And, the domain of the function, it is all real numbers.

Now, For find the derivative of the function f(x) = kx + d using the definition of derivative,

Hence, we start by using the following formula:

f'(x) = lim (h → 0) [f(x + h) - f(x)] / h

First, let's apply this formula to our function:

f'(x) = lim (h → 0) [(k(x + h) + d) - (kx + d)] / h

f'(x) = lim (h → 0) [kx + kh + d - kx - d] / h

f'(x) = lim (h → 0) k(h) / h

f'(x) = lim (h → 0) k

So, the derivative of f(x) = kx + d is,

⇒ k.

And, since there are no restrictions on the values that x can take.

Hence, the domain of the function, it is all real numbers.

Read more about function visit:

brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ4

The correct options are

They can work to decrease their marginal cost.

They can raise prices to increase marginal revenue.

They can keep marginal costs below marginal revenues.

What is the equivalent expression?

Equivalent expressions are expressions that perform the same function despite their appearance. If two algebraic expressions are equivalent, they have the same value when we use the same variable value.

Producers can make the most profit by:

Working to decrease their marginal cost.

Keeping marginal costs below marginal revenues.

Raising prices to increase marginal revenue, as long as it does not decrease demand for their product.

Therefore, the correct options are:

They can work to decrease their marginal cost.

They can raise prices to increase marginal revenue.

They can keep marginal costs below marginal revenues.

To learn more about the equivalent expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Answer:

√28561

Step-by-step explanation:

√ = 169

Square root of 169 = 169²

√28561 = 169

[I apologize if I misunderstood the question.]

To determine the minimum sample size required when you want to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within one unit of the population mean of 12.9, assuming the population is normally distributed and a 95% confidence level:

We can use the formula for the margin of error:

Margin of error = Z * (standard deviation / square root of sample size)

Where Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (in this case, 1.96 for a 95% confidence level).

We want the margin of error to be 1 (within one unit of the population mean), so we can rearrange the formula to solve for the sample size:

Sample size = (Z * standard deviation / margin of error)^2

Plugging in the given values, we get:

Sample size = (1.96 * standard deviation / 1)^2

We don't know the standard deviation of the population, but we can estimate it using a previous study or pilot test. Let's assume we have an estimate of the standard deviation of 2.

Sample size = (1.96 * 2 / 1)^2

Simplifying, we get:

Sample size = 15.21

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we need a minimum sample size of 16 to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within one unit of the population mean of 12.9.

Learn more about Margin of Error here: brainly.in/question/3979238

#SPJ11