The Great Exhibition of 1851, also known as the Crystal Palace Exhibition, was a world's fair held in London's Hyde Park. The event was organized by Prince Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria, with the aim of showcasing British technological and industrial advancements and promoting Britain as a global economic and imperial power.
The Crystal Palace, the building in which the exhibition was held, was an enormous iron and glass structure that was hailed as a marvel of engineering and a symbol of British innovation. The location of the event, in the heart of London, was chosen to demonstrate the city's status as a global center of commerce, culture, and science.
Through the Great Exhibition and the Crystal Palace, Britain hoped to send a message to the world that it was the leading industrial and technological power of the time. The exhibition featured over 100,000 exhibits from around the world, including machinery, textiles, art, and science, and it attracted over six million visitors. It was seen as a symbol of progress and innovation, and it showcased the power and wealth of the British Empire.
Overall, the Great Exhibition and the Crystal Palace were designed to promote Britain's status as a global economic and imperial power and to showcase the country's technological and industrial advancements. The event was a major milestone in the history of industrialization and international exhibitions, and it had a significant impact on the way Britain was perceived by the world.
I GIVE BRAINLIEST PLUS 15 POINTS
Match the following.
1 .
urbanization
devotion to one's country
2 .
nationalism
mass movement to the city
3 .
Prohibition
made sale of liquor illegal
4 .
New Deal
postwar limit in military equipment
5 .
disarmament
set equal trading rights with China
6 .
Open Door Policy
FDR's Depression recovery plan
Match the following.
7 .
League of Nations
Teddy Roosevelt's plan for the fair treatment of the common man
8 .
First Hundred Days
Harding's program for post-war America
9 .
Square Deal
forbade European intervention in the Americas
10 .
normalcy
Wilson's organization for peaceful world settlements
11 .
Monroe Doctrine
FDR's plan to begin immediate positive action
12 .
Fourteen Points
Wilson's peace plan for World War I
Answer:
1. urbanization - mass movement to the city
2. nationalism - devotion to one's country
3. Prohibition - made sale of liquor illegal
4. New Deal - FDR's Depression recovery plan
5. disarmament - postwar limit in military equipment
6. Open Door Policy - set equal trading rights with China
Match the following:
7. League of Nations - Wilson's organization for peaceful world settlements
8. First Hundred Days - FDR's plan to begin immediate positive action
9. Square Deal - Teddy Roosevelt's plan for the fair treatment of the common man
10. normalcy - Harding's program for post-war America
11. Monroe Doctrine - forbade European intervention in the Americas
12. Fourteen Points - Wilson's peace plan for World War I
Explanation:
Please keep your promise with the brainliest 15 points. I took 10-15 minutes to do this. Glad to help.
Entrepreneurs are essential to the free enterprise system because they:
O A. Help money flow through the economy by starting new
businesses.
O B. Protect consumers by regulating the economic behavior of
businesses.
O C. Promote innovation by punishing companies that steal intellectual
property.
O D. Maintain economic equality by controlling the prices of consumer
goods.
Answer: A. Help money flow through the economy by starting new businesses.
Explanation: By taking risks and investing capital, entrepreneurs create new jobs and products, which in turn stimulate economic growth and create opportunities for others.
To what extent (HOW MUCH) do you think the New Deal affected the lives of ordinary citizens? Was the “New Deal” effective for everyone? Why or why not?
RIDD
Support was given to farmers, the jobless, kids, and the elderly. The New Deal attempted to revive the economy after prices had fallen sharply and also featured new rules and safeguards for the banking industry.
What effects did the New Deal have on ordinary people's daily lives?10% of the population did not have a job by 1942. The legalization of employees' rights to form unions had an influence on workers' compensation, the expansion of union membership, and the implementation of a federal minimum wage. In addition to helping mothers with small children, the Social Security system was created to offer elderly pensions.
The "New Deal" has advantages for everyone, right? what manner?They were able to get jobs as a result. It promoted capitalism. As a consequence, the American people's optimism was revived and the country's economic system's credibility was restored. Money, however, did not fair as well.
The "New Deal" under Roosevelt put an end to the Great Depression. Millions of employees have been able to keep their jobs on a variety of public projects around the country thanks to several social and governmental spending programs.
Learn more about The New Deal: https://brainly.com/question/815650
#SPJ1
Which of the following best summarizes why Stalin was opposed to the Truman Doctrine?
O The Truman Doctrine strengthened the European economy to the point that communism was no
longer attractive.
O The Truman Doctrine encouraged European countries to build a military to fight against
communism.
O The Truman Doctrine allowed the U.S. to strengthen its alliance with the United Kingdom.
O The Truman Doctrine provided a declaration of war against the Soviet Union.
Answer:
The best answer is: The Truman Doctrine encouraged European countries to build a military to fight against communism.
Stalin was opposed to the Truman Doctrine because it was seen as a direct challenge to Soviet expansionism in Europe. The Truman Doctrine was a key component of American foreign policy during the early Cold War years, and it provided economic and military aid to European countries in order to help them resist the spread of communism. This aid was seen by Stalin as an attempt to build a military alliance against the Soviet Union, and as a threat to Soviet security interests in Europe. Therefore, Stalin was opposed to the Truman Doctrine because it encouraged European countries to build up their military capabilities to resist communism, which he saw as a direct challenge to Soviet interests in the region.
Give the context
Evaluate the extent to which states strengthened and/or expanded control over colonies in the 1750 to 1900 time period
In the 1750 to 1900 time period, many European states strengthened and expanded their control over their colonies through various means. The extent to which this control was strengthened and expanded varied by region and by time period.
One way that states strengthened their control over colonies was through the implementation of new legal systems and bureaucracies. This was particularly evident in India, where the British East India Company established a system of law and bureaucracy that effectively governed the country.
Similarly, the French established a system of indirect rule in their West African colonies, which allowed them to exert significant control over the region through local intermediaries.
Another way that states expanded their control over colonies was through the use of military force. This was particularly evident in Africa, where European powers engaged in a "scramble for Africa" in the late 19th century. European states such as France, Britain, and Germany used military force to conquer and colonize much of the continent.
Overall, while states did strengthen and expand their control over colonies in the 1750 to 1900 time period, the extent of this control varied by region and by time period. Some states, such as the British in India, were able to establish effective systems of governance and bureaucracy, while others relied on military force to conquer and control their colonies.
To learn more about colonies refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/20147075
#SPJ11
n this excerpt, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explains his ruling in Schenck v. United States. What argument is Holmes making about personal rights and free speech?
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
–Schenck v. United State
Responses
The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
The constitutional protection of free speech is absolute, and each person has a right to express his or herself however he or she wishes.
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes is making the argument B. The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
What does Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes say ?According to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, safeguarding the freedom of speech is crucial; nonetheless, there are occasional instances wherein individual expression can be deemed unreasonable and prohibited.
The government, in his view, possesses the authority to either curtail or forbid free speech whenever it creates a risk that Congress possesses the right to forestall, which results in acute hazards. This conception implies that while the Constitution defends liberty of speech, it isn't an absolute right and must be counterpoised against other significant concerns such as national security or public safety. Hence, to maintain a well-regulated community, limitations on free speech may become essential.
Find out more on Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes at https://brainly.com/question/13930380
#SPJ1
According to sigmund Freud memories that usually surface into everyday thoughts for which part of the mind
According to sigmund Freud , memories that usually surface into everyday thoughts are part of the conscious mind. The conscious mind is one of the three components of Freud's structural model of the psyche, along with the preconscious and unconscious minds.
The conscious mind contains thoughts, feelings, and perceptions that we are actively aware of at any given time. Memories from the preconscious can also become accessible to the conscious mind through active recollection or external cues.
However, memories stored in the unconscious mind are typically hidden from our everyday thoughts, as they are repressed due to their potentially disturbing or threatening nature.
To know more about sigmund Freud ,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/5286466#
#SPJ11
Why is it important for researchers to study how the black death spread? develop a convincing argument using your own logical reasoning and details from the article.
Studying the spread of the Black Death is important for understanding disease transmission, historical context, and the role of trade in pandemics.
Studying the spread of the Black Death is important for several reasons. First and foremost, it can provide insight into how diseases spread and how they can be contained. The Black Death was one of the deadliest pandemics in human history, and understanding how it spread could help prevent similar outbreaks in the future.
Furthermore, studying the Black Death can also provide historical context and help us understand the social and economic impacts of pandemics. The Black Death had a profound impact on European society, leading to widespread social and economic upheaval. By studying the Black Death, researchers can gain a better understanding of how pandemics can affect society and the economy.
Additionally, studying the Black Death can help us understand the role of trade and transportation in the spread of diseases. The Black Death is believed to have spread through trade routes and transportation networks, and understanding these mechanisms of disease transmission can help us develop more effective strategies for disease prevention and control.
In conclusion, studying the spread of the Black Death is essential for developing a better understanding of how pandemics spread and how they can be contained. It can also provide valuable historical context and help us understand the social and economic impacts of pandemics. Finally, it can shed light on the role of trade and transportation in the spread of diseases and help us develop more effective strategies for disease prevention and control.
To learn more about the Black Death , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17920987
#SPJ11
Is Kemp’s speech a trustworthy source about the effects of Reaganomics? Why or why not?
Kemp's speech can be considered a somewhat trustworthy source about the effects of Reaganomics, but it is important to consider potential biases and limitations. As a politician and a key proponent of Reaganomics, Kemp is likely to have a favorable view of the policy and its outcomes.
This could lead to him presenting the positive aspects of the policy while downplaying or ignoring negative consequences.
To assess the trustworthiness of Kemp's speech, it is essential to cross-reference his claims with other sources and evidence. This will help determine if his perspective aligns with a broader consensus among economists and historians.
Additionally, considering the context in which Kemp delivered the speech can provide insights into his motivations and the intended audience.
In summary, Kemp's speech can serve as a source for understanding the effects of Reaganomics, but it should be approached with caution due to potential biases.
A more comprehensive assessment of Reaganomics should involve examining a variety of sources, including academic research and firsthand accounts from diverse perspectives. This will enable a better understanding of the policy's overall impact and its various consequences.
To know more about Reaganomics refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/4404145#
#SPJ11
Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence about the origins of the Bill of Rights.
The ? idea that government should protect human rights influenced the US Bill of Rights.
The ? was the first document to limit a king’s power and give people a say in government.
The Bill of Rights comprise the first ? amendments to the US Constitution.
The United States Constitution ratified the Bill of Rights in 1791, a compilation of amendments intended to limit the government’s authority and ensure fundamental personal freedoms for all Americans.
As early as the notion of natural rights, it was assumed that protection of human liberties such as free speech, religion, and legal procedure were imperative federal obligations.
Read more on Bill of rights here:https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
Answer:
Enlightenment, Magna Carta, and 10.
Explanation:
how did immigration impact the North?
Answer: Immigration had a significant impact on the North, particularly during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Millions of people from Europe and other parts of the world migrated to the United States during this time, and many settled in the Northern states.
One of the most significant impacts of immigration was the growth of the Northern population. Immigrants settled in cities such as New York, Boston, Chicago, and Philadelphia, where they often formed ethnic enclaves and brought their own cultures and traditions with them. This led to a diverse and cosmopolitan population, which helped to shape the identity of many Northern cities.
Immigrants also played a crucial role in the Northern economy, particularly in industries such as manufacturing and construction. Many immigrants worked in factories and mills, often in dangerous and difficult conditions, and they helped to fuel the growth of the Northern economy during the Industrial Revolution.
However, immigration was not always welcomed by native-born Americans, and it led to significant social tensions and discrimination against immigrants. Some native-born Americans feared that immigrants would take their jobs, and there were often clashes between different ethnic and racial groups in Northern cities.
Despite these challenges, immigration continued to play a major role in shaping the North, both socially and economically. Today, many Northern cities continue to be home to large immigrant populations, and their contributions to the region's culture and economy are still felt.
Explanation:
Why did Rev. Jesse Jackson call Emmet Till’s murder the big bang of the Civil Rights Movement
Rev. Jesse Jackson called Emmet Till's murder the big bang of the Civil Rights Movement because it was a pivotal moment that brought widespread attention and outrage to the brutal reality of racism and violence in the South.
Till's murder and the subsequent acquittal of his white murderers highlighted the injustices of the Jim Crow era and galvanized civil rights activists and organizations to push for change. It also drew national attention to the efforts of the NAACP and other groups working to combat racial discrimination and segregation.
Till's death served as a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement, inspiring a generation of activists to fight for racial justice and equality.
To know more about Civil Rights Movement , refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/31897973#
#SPJ11
The Roman Empire was made up of what two types of provinces?
Hadrian and Tetarchy
Tetarchy and Diocletian
Senatorial and Imperial
Diocletian and Imperial
Answer:
Sentorial and imperial
What is the advantage of this story being told by a U.S. reporter from a neutral country, rather than a German or Frenchman?
Help!! Please and Thank Youu!!
The advantage of this story being told by a U.S. reporter from a neutral country, rather than a German or Frenchman, is that it provides a more objective and unbiased perspective on the events being reported. So, the U.S. reporter can perform objective reporting.
Additionally, as a U.S. reporter, they may have a better understanding of the cultural and political context of the events being reported, which could help them provide more insightful and nuanced coverage. They may also have better access to sources and information that could be critical to understanding the situation.
Therefore, having a U.S. reporter from a neutral country provides a unique perspective that is less likely to be influenced by personal biases or cultural norms, which can lead to more objective and accurate reporting.
Learn more about objective reporting, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11405528
#SPJ1
What events that took place after World War I contributed to the start of World War II?
List at least two events that contributed to the start of World War II.
An optional way you may start your response is:
After the First World War, . . .
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
1. The Great Depression (In an effort to pay back their debts following WWI, Germany printed money. This caused hyperinflation and the country, as well as the the world, fell into a huge economic depression).
2. The establishment of Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler's dictatorship (Hitler used the Jewish population as a scapegoat and implemented inhumane conditions to eliminate them. Hitler desperately wanted to expand his territory, which lead to the invasion of Poland in 1939. This is what caused the UK and France to declare war on Germany, which is why it is largely regarded as the start of WWII).
As governor of georgia, jimmy carter actively supported the republican party
integration
segregation
the republican party
all of lester maddox's policies
As governor of georgia, Jimmy Carter actively supported the republican party segregation.
The correct option is B.
Jimmy Carter was an advocate of racial integration in Georgia and supported the integration of public schools, universities, and other public institutions. He believed that segregation was wrong and wrongfully denied people their civil rights. He actively worked to promote the integration of the Republican Party in Georgia, pushing for stronger representation of African-Americans in the Republican Party and canvassing in African-American communities. Carter also opposed all of Lester Maddox’s policies, which were heavily rooted in segregation.
Carter also pushed for economic reforms that would help alleviate poverty in the state and worked to improve the state’s public education system. He believed that education was the key to success, and worked to make sure that all Georgians had access to quality education regardless of their race.
The correct option is B.
To know more about Jimmy Carter , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23064245
#SPJ4
With their newly acquired right to vote, what were Seattle women able to do?
A.)They voted for prohibition
B.)They voted to recall the mayor of Seattle
C.)They voted for the first woman governor
D.)They voted to legalize the right to carry arms
They voted to recall the mayor of Seattle
Seattle women were able to exercise their newly acquired right to vote by voting to recall the mayor of Seattle. This was part of a movement to bring about political change in the city.
The Seattle women voted to recall the mayor of Seattle in 1913 when they were given voting powers due to the mayor's refusal to enforce the city's new female minimum wage ordinance.
The mayor argued that the minimum wage ordinance was unconstitutional, and he refused to enforce it. This angered many of the citizens of Seattle, especially the women who were the primary beneficiaries of the ordinance.
The recall became a referendum on the mayor's failure to protect the rights of working women and the women of Seattle voted to recall him.
To know more about Voting:
https://brainly.com/question/9811814
How do you think news of the American revolution affected American colonists ruled by Spain
The American Revolution may have had a direct impact on American colonists ruled by Spain, but it may have indirectly affected the Spanish colonies by changing the balance of power in the region. This may have given Spain an opportunity to expand its own influence in the Americas.
A ducks mass at birth is 0.05 kilograms. the duck gains approximately 0.042 kilograms each week. after how many weeks is the ducks mass 0.890 kilograms?
Answer:
To find out after how many weeks the duck's mass reaches 0.890 kilograms, we can set up an equation and solve for the number of weeks.
Let's assume the number of weeks is represented by "w."
Given:
The initial mass of the duck (at birth) = 0.05 kilograms
Mass gained per week = 0.042 kilograms
The equation can be set up as follows:
0.05 + 0.042w = 0.890
To solve for "w," we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. First, let's subtract 0.05 from both sides:
0.042w = 0.890 - 0.05
0.042w = 0.84
Now, divide both sides of the equation by 0.042:
w = 0.84 / 0.042
w ≈ 20
Therefore, after approximately 20 weeks, the duck's mass will reach 0.890 kilograms.
How did the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt as president, and World War I, highlight similar civil rights issues?
O They revealed a need for the protection of voting rights.
O They revealed injustices against LGBTQ+ people.
They showed the importance of Indigenous self-determination.
They showed that people with disabilities have a role in society.
Answer:
One of the most dynamic political careers of any Hoosier belonged to Governor Paul V. McNutt. He set his sights on the U.S. presidency as early as the 1920s, when he was the state and national commander of the American Legion. His advocacy of human rights, particularly for the Jewish people during his time as Governor and High Commissioner to the Philippines, put his moral arc far beyond some of his peers. In the 1940 presidential election, McNutt was also considered a Democratic “Dark Horse” candidate before Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to run for an unprecedented third term. McNutt’s progressive, internationalist political identity squared well with the New Deal Era and growing American involvement in World War II. While his chance to become president never materialized, McNutt’s decades of public service revealed a man dedicated to democracy and humanitarianism.
Explanation:
When Huey Long preposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as es the Governor of Louisiana a US Senator from Louisiana. The President of the United States. A representat ve in the Louisiana House.
When Huey Long proposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as a US Senator from Louisiana.
When Huey Long proposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as a U.S. Senator from Louisiana. Long was a charismatic and controversial figure who had risen to political prominence as the Governor of Louisiana in the 1920s, where he implemented a range of populist policies that aimed to redistribute wealth and power.
As a U.S. Senator, Long continued to push for radical reforms to address the economic and social inequality that he saw as endemic in American society. The "Share Our Wealth" plan was Long's most ambitious proposal, calling for a progressive tax on income and inheritances, a limit on individual wealth, and a guaranteed income and education for all Americans. Long believed that this plan would stimulate the economy, reduce poverty, and create a more equal society.
Long's proposal was met with both support and opposition. Some saw him as a champion of the people, fighting against the wealthy elite and advocating for the working class. Others saw him as a demagogue and a threat to the established order, whose radical policies could lead to economic collapse and social chaos. Despite this opposition, Long's ideas had a lasting impact on American politics, influencing the New Deal policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and shaping the political discourse of the 1930s and beyond.
To learn more about Share Our Wealth refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30237232
#SPJ11
What does Bruno want to do
This is from the text "The Boy in Stripped Pajamas". Bruno aspires to be an explorer when he grows up, which is important to the plot since Bruno encounters Shmuel while exploring Out-With.
How is this so?Bruno informed Shmuel that when he grew older, he wanted to be an adventurer. He said that the most essential aspect of exploring is determining if what you uncover is intriguing and hence worth learning about, or whether it is harmful and should be avoided.
Bruno is passionate in art and books, and he enjoys exploring. He aspires to be a soldier like his father, and despite the fact that his parents never explain what is going on in the war, he has been raised to think that Germany, the "Fatherland," is superior to all other nations.
Learn more about The Boy in Stripped Pajamas:
https://brainly.com/question/24143877
#SPJ1
Full Question:
What does Bruno want to do when he grows up? And, why is it meaningful to the story?
How did the gag rule affect John Quincy Adam's proposal?
The gag rule, which prohibited the discussion of slavery in Congress, drastically impacted John Quincy Adams' concept to repeal the rule.
Because of the gag rule, Adams was not able to openly debate the problem of slavery in the Congress, which became a vital to advantage aid for his suggestion and Opinion.
Despite this impediment, Adams became capable of use parliamentary approaches to carry interest to the issue and ultimately advantage assist for his concept. The gag rule became finally repealed, allowing for open debate on the difficulty of slavery in Congress.
Learn more about gag rule:-
https://brainly.com/question/10010017
#SPJ1
Analyze the wwii political cartoons and answer the questions that follow in the space provided.
what event is being depicted in this cartoon? explain your answer by providing details from the cartoon.
how does this event change the course of the war? explain its significance.
The Allied troops' landing operations during World War II's Operation Overlord were known as the D-Day invasion or Normandy landings. The liberation of German-occupied Western Europe from Nazi rule started with the landings on June 6, 1944.
Because of its significance in World War II, the D-Day invasion is remembered in history. Less than a year after the invasion, the Allies formally recognized Nazi Germany's capitulation, signaling the end of the Nazi regime's hold on power.
On all sides of the fight, D-Day was a bloody day that altered not just the future of nations but also the futures of whole families. Because of such, there is a lot to learn.
To learn more about D-Day, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2393370
#SPJ4
Complete the mathematical sentence by finding the percentage of each item.the first number is done for you.
The value of 20% of 100 is 20.
To find the percentage of each item, divide the item's value by the total value and multiply by 100. For example, if there are three items with values of 20, 30, and 50, the percentage of the first item would be (20/100) x 100 = 20%.
When working with percentages, it's important to remember that the percentage represents a part of a whole.
To find the percentage of each item in a group, we need to determine what percentage of the total value each item represents. This can be done by dividing the item's value by the total value and then multiplying by 100 to convert the decimal to a percentage.
In the example given, we have three items with values of 20, 30, and 50. To find the percentage of the first item, we divide its value by the total value (20 + 30 + 50 = 100) and then multiply by 100. This gives us (20/100) x 100 = 20%.
We can repeat this process for each item to find its percentage of the total value. For the second item, the calculation would be (30/100) x 100 = 30%, and for the third item, it would be (50/100) x 100 = 50%.
By finding the percentage of each item, we can compare their relative importance within the group and identify any trends or patterns in the data. This can be useful in a wide variety of applications, from financial analysis to scientific research.
To know more about percentage click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/16797504#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Complete the mathematical sentence by finding the percentage of each item.the first number is done for you.
1. 20% of 15
= (20/100)*15
=0.2*15
=3
2. 20% of 100 = ?
How is the parliamentary system of government different from the presidential system
The parliamentary system of government and the presidential system are two different forms of democratic government, with distinct structures and powers. Here are some key differences between them:
Executive Power: In a parliamentary system, the executive power is vested in the Prime Minister and the Cabinet, who are members of the parliament. In a presidential system, the executive power is vested in the President who is elected by the people.
Separation of Powers: In a presidential system, there is a clear separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. In a parliamentary system, the executive and legislative branches are often fused, with the parliament having the power to remove the Prime Minister through a vote of no confidence.
Role of the Legislature: In a parliamentary system, the legislature plays a more dominant role, with the Prime Minister and Cabinet being accountable to the parliament. In a presidential system, the President is often more independent from the legislature.
Term of Office: In a parliamentary system, the Prime Minister's term of office depends on the support of the parliament, which can vote to remove him or her at any time. In a presidential system, the President's term of office is fixed, and he or she cannot be removed except through impeachment or resignation.
Electoral System: In a parliamentary system, voters elect members of parliament who then choose the Prime Minister. In a presidential system, voters directly elect the President.
Overall, the main difference between the two systems is that in a parliamentary system, the executive and legislative branches are more closely linked, while in a presidential system they are more separate.
3. Why was Democrat Woodrow Wilson able to win two presidential elections during an era of Republican Party control?
O Expanded voting rights resulted in more Democratic voters.
O The resignation of a Republican President damaged the party.
O Farmers, laborers, businessmen, and freed slaves supported Wilson.
Republican support was divided between two candidates.
There were the multiple reasons why Democrat Woodrow Wilson was able to win two presidential elections during an era of Republican Party control. One reason was the expanded voting rights that resulted in more Democratic voters. So the right option is: O Expanded voting rights resulted in more Democratic voters.
Additionally, the resignation of a Republican President, William Howard Taft, damaged the party's reputation. Wilson was also able to garner support from a diverse group of individuals, including the farmers, laborers, businessmen, and freed slaves.
Lastly, Republican support was divided between the two candidates, which may have contributed to Wilson's victories.
For more questions on: Woodrow Wilson
https://brainly.com/question/30461705
#SPJ11
1. Please summarize Dr. West's argument.
2. Please explain why Dr. West opens the op-ed with a reference to Frederick Douglas.
3. Please describe the purpose of Dr Wests op-ed.
4. Please explain Howard Universities motive behind the restructuring of the Classics
department.
5. What does Dr. West mean by "The Western canon is, more than anything, a conversation
among great thinkers"
In his op-ed, Dr. Cornel West argues that the decision by Howard University to eliminate its Classics department is a mistake. He believes that the Classics are an essential part of a well-rounded education and that they can help students develop critical thinking skills, deepen their understanding of Western civilization, and connect with other cultures.
Dr. West opens the op-ed with a reference to Frederick Douglass to highlight the importance of studying the Classics. Douglass was a former slave who became a prominent abolitionist and intellectual. He studied the Classics and believed that they were essential to his education and development as a thinker.
The purpose of Dr. West's op-ed is to argue against the decision by Howard University to eliminate its Classics department. He believes that this decision will be detrimental to the education of Howard students and to the study of the Classics more broadly.
Howard University's motive behind the restructuring of the Classics department is to focus on more "practical" majors that will better prepare students for the job market. The university argues that the elimination of the Classics department is part of a larger restructuring effort aimed at addressing budgetary and enrollment challenges.
When Dr. West says that "The Western canon is, more than anything, a conversation among great thinkers," he is emphasizing the idea that the Classics are not a fixed set of texts but rather an ongoing dialogue among thinkers across time and space. He believes that this conversation is essential to understanding Western civilization and that it can help us grapple with contemporary issues.
Learn more about budgetary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29798607
#SPJ4
Texas has played an important role in electronics and space technology in the United States. Choose an important innovation that was created in Texas, and describe how our lives are different because of it
In 1958, Jack Kilby of Texas Instruments created the integrated circuit, which revolutionised the electronics industry by allowing for smaller, quicker, and more powerful electronic devices.
The integrated circuit, often known as the microchip, was conceived by Jack Kilby at Texas Instruments in 1958 and is considered a significant discovery. The integrated circuit revolutionised the electronics industry by making it possible to produce smaller, quicker, and more powerful electronic devices.
This breakthrough opened the way for contemporary computers, cell phones, and other electronic gadgets, which are now an indispensable part of our everyday life. Our world would be considerably different without the integrated circuit, and our capacity to communicate and access information would be severely constrained.
Learn more about Jack Kilby:
https://brainly.com/question/30747504
#SPJ4
Consider John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx. If they argued, how would their argument differ (or not) from the arguments of French Revolutionaries (Jacobins, moderates, and the "Conspiracy of Equals" for example) among one another? Are there any insights you can draw from the similarities and differences? What has changed in Europe in this century?
Marx, on the other hand, criticized the Revolution's shortcomings and thought that it did not advance social transformation sufficiently. Without knowing more details about the arguments you're referencing; it is difficult to say how they would differ (or not) from those of French Revolutionaries among themselves. Technological breakthroughs, political events like the creation of the European Union, and social changes like increased diversity and globalisation are a few of these changes.
Globalization is the connecting and integrating of individuals, groups, and governments from all over the world (Commonwealth English; note spelling variants). In the early 20th century, the term "globalization" replaced the earlier French term "mondialisation." It developed its current meaning sometime in the second half of the century, and it first became widely used in the 1990s to describe the unprecedented levels of global connectivity of the post-Cold War world.
Its origins can be traced back to the 18th and 19th centuries thanks to developments in communication and transportation technologies. The expansion of international trade and the exchange of ideologies, worldviews, and cultural traditions are two outcomes of these stronger ties.
Learn more about globalization here:
brainly.com/question/30111559
#SPJ4
