If FDATA follows an F distribution with df1=4 and df2=5, what is the boundary value of F where P(FDATA < F) = 0.95? a. 0.05 b. 5.1922 c. 6.2561 d. 15.5291 e. 11.3919

1. To compare the shape of your sampling distributions to the original data set and each other, look at the Histogram-Population and the frequency histograms for different sample sizes (n=10, n=20, n=40).

In genetics, a population is often defined as a set of organisms in which any pair of members can breed together. This means that they can regularly exchange gametes to produce normally-fertile offspring, and such a breeding group is also known therefore as a gamodeme. This also implies that all members belong to the same species.[4] If the gamodeme is very large (theoretically, approaching infinity), and all gene alleles are uniformly distributed by the gametes within it, the gamodeme is said to be panmictic. Under this state, allele (gamete) frequencies can be converted to genotype (zygote) frequencies by expanding an appropriate quadratic equation, as shown by Sir Ronald Fisher in his establishment of quantitative genetics.

Learn more about Population here:

https://brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11

The correct setup for doing the dependent (paired) t-test on JASP is to input the two sets of data into separate columns under "Data," select "Descriptives Statistics," and then select "Paired Samples T-Test" to obtain the test results.

To conduct a dependent (paired) t-test on JASP, follow these steps:

Open JASP and go to the "t-tests" module.

Click on "Paired Samples T-test" under the "Independent Samples" header.

In the "Variables" section, select the two related variables (placebo and drug) by clicking on them and moving them to the "Paired Variables" box.

Under "Options," select the desired alpha level (usually 0.05) and check the box for "Descriptive Statistics" to get summary statistics for each variable.

Click "Run" to perform the paired t-test and generate the results.

Using the given data, the setup in JASP would be as follows

Variable 1 Placebo - enter the data for the placebo group (180, 188, 200, 201, 190, 197, 170, 174, 210, 215)

Variable 2 Drug - enter the data for the drug group (195, 194, 170, 174, 210, 215, 195, 194, 197, 190)

Then, follow the above steps 3-5 as described above to perform the paired t-test and obtain the results.

So, the result is 195, 194.

To know more about t-test:

https://brainly.com/question/15870238

#SPJ4

If Mrs. Botchway bought 45.35 meters of cloth and divided equally among her five-kids, then each child share will be 9.07 meter.

In order to find out how many meters of cloth each child should receive, we need to divide the total amount of cloth purchased by the number of children.

We know that,

⇒ Total-amount of cloth purchased = 45.35 meters,

⇒ Number of children = 5,

So, to divide the cloth equally among the 5 children, we divide the total amount of cloth by the number of children,

⇒ 45.35/5,

⇒ 9.07 meters per child,

Therefore, each child should receive 9.07 meters of cloth.

Learn more about Share here

https://brainly.com/question/29258969

#SPJ4

The statement "Because the histogram on the right looks like a normal distribution, we can have confidence that the p value is giving us a correct estimate of whether we are making a Type I error" is false because of residuals is desirable, it does not guarantee the accuracy of our p-value and our ability to avoid Type I errors.

The p-value is a statistical measure that tells us the likelihood of observing a certain result if the null hypothesis is true. In this case, the null hypothesis could be that there is no significant relationship between the speed and stopping distance of a car.

The histogram on the right side of the plot shows the distribution of the residuals, which are the differences between the predicted stopping distances and the actual stopping distances. If the histogram looks like a normal distribution, it suggests that the residuals are normally distributed, which is a desirable characteristic of a regression model.

However, this does not necessarily mean that the p-value is giving us a correct estimate of whether we are making a Type I error. A Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. The p-value can help us determine whether our results are statistically significant, but it cannot guarantee that we are not making a Type I error.

To know more about p-value here

https://brainly.com/question/14790912

#SPJ4

The sum of the series is 27/2.

We have,

The given series is a geometric series with the first term (a) = 9 and common ratio (r) = 1/3.

Using the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series, the sum of the given series is:

S = a / (1 - r)

S = 9 / (1 - 1/3)

S = 9 / (2/3)

S = 27/2

So the sum of the series depends on the value of n, the number of terms being added.

As n approaches infinity, the term (1/3)^n approaches zero, and the sum approaches 27/2.

Therefore,

The sum of the series is 27/2.

Learn more about geometric sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/2321576

#SPJ4

To solve the problem, we can use the formula for compound interest:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where A is the amount at the end of the investment period, P is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

Using this formula, we get:

Annually: A = 3000(1 + 0.03/1)^(1*5) = $3,477.82

Semiannually: A = 3000(1 + 0.03/2)^(2*5) = $3,481.62

Monthly: A = 3000(1 + 0.03/12)^(12*5) = $3,484.85

Weekly: A = 3000(1 + 0.03/52)^(52*5) = $3,485.35

Daily: A = 3000(1 + 0.03/365)^(365*5) = $3,485.48

Continuously: A = 3000e^(0.03*5) = $3,485.50

For the differential equation satisfied by A for the case of continuous compounding, we can use the formula for continuous compounding:

A = Pe^(rt)

where e is the mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.71828.

Differentiating both sides with respect to t, we get:

dA/dt = P(re^(rt))

Substituting P = 3000 and r = 0.03, we get:

dA/dt = 90e^(0.03t)

Therefore, the differential equation satisfied by A is:

dA/dt = 90e^(0.03t)

Learn more about compound interest,

https://brainly.com/question/24274034

#SPJ11

The probability that the average sleeping hours will be below 6.9 hours is 0.9798, or 97.98%.

a. The expected average sleeping time is equal to the population mean, which is 6.78 hours.

b. The standard deviation for the average sleeping time is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size. This is also known as the standard error of the mean. Thus,

Standard deviation for the average sleeping time = 1.24 / sqrt(175) = 0.0946 hours.

c. To find the probability that the average sleeping time will be below 6.9 hours, we need to standardize the distribution of sample means to a standard normal distribution.

z = (x - μ) / (σ / sqrt(n))

where z is the standard normal variable, x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (6.9 - 6.78) / (1.24 / sqrt(175)) = 2.05

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a standard normal variable being less than 2.05 is 0.9798.

Thus, the probability that the average sleeping hours will be below 6.9 hours is 0.9798, or 97.98%.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The best source of these data would be the hospital's patient records and medical databases, which can provide detailed information on the treatment and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.

To compare long-term survival rates for pancreatic cancer with medical versus surgical treatment, the cancer committee at Wharton General Hospital should consult the "National Cancer Database" or "NCDB." This database contains comprehensive data on cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates, making it the best source for the information you're seeking. By analyzing these data, the cancer committee can compare the long-term survival rates of patients who received medical treatment versus those who underwent surgical treatment, and determine which approach is most effective for improving patient outcomes.

Learn more about rates here: brainly.com/question/29781084

#SPJ11

The 99% confidence interval for the population mean is approximately $52.17 to $57.83.

Given your sample size (n) of 120 computers, a sample mean  of $55, and a population standard deviation (σ) of $12,

For a 99% confidence interval, the critical z-value (z) is approximately 2.576. Now, we can plug in the values:

CI = 55 ± (2.576 × 12 / √120)

CI = 55 ± (2.576 × 12 / 10.954)

CI = 55 ± (31.032 / 10.954)

CI = 55 ± 2.83

Therefore, the 99% confidence interval for the population mean is approximately $52.17 to $57.83.

To learn more about confidence interval here:

brainly.com/question/24131141#

#SPJ11

Independent and identical exponential variables with 2 = If Y = X1 + X2 + X3 = E(Y) = 1.5 and VAR(Y) = 0.75 and

The probability that Y is greater than 10 is negligible.

The sum of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) exponential variables with the same parameter is a gamma variable with shape parameter equal to the number of variables being summed and scale parameter equal to the parameter of the exponential variables. [tex]Y = X1 + X2 + X3[/tex] is a gamma variable with shape parameter k = 3 and scale parameter [tex]\theta = 1/2[/tex].

The mean and variance of a gamma distribution with shape parameter k and scale parameter θ are:

[tex]E(Y) = k\theta[/tex]

[tex]VAR(Y) = k\theta^2[/tex]

Substituting k = 3 and [tex]\theta = 1/2[/tex], we get:

[tex]E(Y) = 3 \times 1/2 = 1.5[/tex]

[tex]VAR(Y) = 3 \times (1/2)^2 = 0.75[/tex]

Therefore,[tex]E(Y) = 1.5 and VAR(Y) = 0.75.[/tex]

To find [tex]P(Y > 10),[/tex] we can standardize Y as follows:

[tex]Z = (Y - E(Y)) / \sqrt{(VAR(Y))} = (Y - 1.5) / \sqrt{(0.75)[/tex]

Then, we have:

[tex]P(Y > 10) = P(Z > (10 - 1.5) / \sqrt{(0.75)})= P(Z > 6.87)[/tex]

Since Z is a standard normal variable, we can use the standard normal distribution table or calculator to find that P(Z > 6.87) is essentially 0.

The probability that Y is greater than 10 is negligible.

For similar questions on variables

https://brainly.com/question/27894163

#SPJ11

It is consistent with the first derivative test for local extreme values because a function f can possibly have a local extreme value at interior points where f' is undefined. Hence the correct option is C.

Given is a function f(x) = |x|.

Absolute minimum value of f(x) is, x = 0.

But the function f is not differentiable at x = 0.

Since f'(0) is undefined, x = 0 is a critical point of f.

Local minimum value of a function is at the point x = c, where f(c) ≤ f(x) for all x ∈ Domain of f.

First derivative theorem for local extreme values states that if a function's derivative changes sign around it's critical point, then the function has the local extremum values at that point.

So the given function could have the local minimum value at x = 0 even the function's derivative is not defined there.

Hence the correct option is C.

Learn more about Local Extreme Values here :

https://brainly.com/question/31398794

#SPJ4

The value of a, b and c from the given function are -2, -1 and 5.

The equation can be written as

f(x) = 3x³ + ax² + bx + c

We know that f(2) = -8 and f(1) = -2.

Substituting x = 2 into the equation, we get

-8 = 3(2)³ + a(2)² + b(2) + c

-8 = 24 + 4a + 2b + c

-32 = 4a + 2b + c

Substituting x = 1 into the equation, we get

-2 = 3(1)³ + a(1)² + b(1) + c

-2 = 3 + a + b + c

-5 = a + b + c

We now have two equations with three unknowns. Solving this system of equations, we get

a = -2, b = -1 and c = 5

Therefore, the value of a, b and c from the given function are -2, -1 and 5.

To learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28303908.

#SPJ4

The absolute maximum of f(x) = x² + 4x + 10 on [1, 2] is 18 and the absolute minimum is 2. The critical point is x=-2.

To find the absolute maximum and minimum of the function f(x) = x² + 4x + 10 on the interval [1, 2], we can use the Extreme Value Theorem.

First, we find the critical points by taking the derivative of f(x) and setting it equal to 0

f'(x) = 2x + 4 = 0

x = -2

Next, we evaluate the function at the critical point and the endpoints of the interval

f(1) = 15

f(2) = 18

f(-2) = 2

Therefore, the absolute maximum of f(x) on the interval [1, 2] is f(2) = 18 and the absolute minimum is f(-2) = 2.

To know more about absolute maximum and minimum:

https://brainly.com/question/29030328

#SPJ4

--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given

" Find the absolute maximum and minimum. If either exists, for the function on the indicated interval [1, 2] f(x)= x² .4x+10 (A) 18, 2 (B)-4,01 (C)-2, 1 "--

aw/ar = 16 - 16r + 4t and aw/at = r + 4.

we can find aw/ar and aw/at as follows:

aw/ar = 6rt

aw/at =[tex]4r^2 - 2rt - 1[/tex].

(a) Using the Chain Rule, we can find the partial derivatives of w with respect to r and t as follows:

∂w/∂r = (∂w/∂x) * (∂x/∂r) + (∂w/∂y) * (∂y/∂r) + (∂w/∂z) * (∂z/∂r)

= h * 4 + t * r * 0 + (-4) * (4r - t)

= 16 - 16r + 4t

∂w/∂t = (∂w/∂x) * (∂x/∂t) + (∂w/∂y) * (∂y/∂t) + (∂w/∂z) * (∂z/∂t)

= h * 0 + r * 1 + (-4) * (-1)

= r + 4

(b) We can write w as a function of r and t as follows:

w = xy + z = rt(4r - t) + 4r - t = 4r^2t - rt^2 + 4r - t

Now we can use the product and chain rules to find the partial derivatives of w with respect to r and t:

∂w/∂r = 8rt - 2rt = 6rt

∂w/∂t = 4r^2 - 2rt - 1.

Learn more about Chain Rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/28972262

#SPJ11

The statement "Conditional probability does not rely on another event happening" false because conditional probability relies on another event happening

Now, let's address the statement "Conditional probability does not rely on another event happening. True or False?" The statement is False. Conditional probability by definition relies on another event happening, which is the event that the probability is conditioned on. In the example above, event B is a prerequisite for calculating the probability of event A, so the occurrence of event B is necessary for the calculation of the conditional probability P(A|B).

To explain this concept mathematically, let's use the formula for conditional probability:

P(A|B) = P(A and B) / P(B)

Where P(A and B) is the probability of both events A and B occurring, and P(B) is the probability of event B occurring. This formula shows us that the probability of A occurring given B has occurred is equal to the joint probability of A and B occurring divided by the probability of B occurring.

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

a) To create a 90% confidence interval for the average monthly income of this investment scheme, we will use the following formula:

Confidence Interval = (mean - margin of error, mean + margin of error)

First, we need to find the margin of error. We will use the t-distribution because the sample size is small (31 months). The formula for the margin of error is:

Margin of Error = t * (standard deviation / √sample size)

To find the t-value, we use a t-table and look for the value that corresponds to a 90% confidence level and degrees of freedom (sample size - 1) equal to 30. The t-value is approximately 1.697.

Margin of Error = 1.697 * (86 / √31)
Margin of Error ≈ 25.9829

Now we can calculate the confidence interval:

Confidence Interval = (670 - 25.9829, 670 + 25.9829)
Confidence Interval ≈ (644.0171, 695.9829)

The 90% confidence interval for the average monthly income of this scheme is (644.0171, 695.9829), rounded to four decimal places.

b) Since the confidence interval (644.0171, 695.9829) contains 640, but the lower bound is above 640, you should consider investing in this scheme as it has a high probability of providing an average monthly income of at least 640 dollars.

Learn more about it:

brainly.com/question/31581796

#SPJ11

The the coordinate grid containing a U shape with arrows on both ends that opens to the right and passes through the origin is a function. Therefore, the correct option is option 1.

To determine which relation is a function, you should consider these three graphs:

1. A coordinate grid containing a U shape with arrows on both ends that opens to the right, with the bottom portion passing through the origin.

2. A coordinate grid with the graph of a circle centered at the origin and passing through the point (2, 1).

3. A coordinate grid with the graph of a vertical line at x=3.

A relation is a function if each input (x-value) has exactly one output (y-value).

1. The U shape with arrows on both ends that opens to the right is a parabola. In this case, for every x-value, there is only one corresponding y-value. Therefore, this relation is a function.

2. The graph of a circle centered at the origin and passing through the point (2, 1) is not a function. This is because there are x-values that have more than one corresponding y-value (e.g., points on opposite sides of the circle sharing the same x-value). Hence, this relation is not a function.

3. The coordinate grid with the graph of a vertical line at x=3 is not a function either. In this case, every x-value (3) has an infinite number of y-values, which violates the definition of a function.

In conclusion, among the given relations, option 1: the coordinate grid containing a U shape with arrows on both ends that opens to the right and passes through the origin is a function.

Learn more about Function:

https://brainly.com/question/22340031

#SPJ11

1. The degrees of freedom would be: df = 15

2. The observed t-value is 3.14.

3. The lower bound of the 95% Confidence Interval for the difference in means is: 6.227.

Let's have a look at the data:

Group Favorability Scores

Control 48, 50, 52, 46, 45, 53, 44, 51, 49

Treatment 55, 58, 61, 63, 57, 59, 60, 62, 56

To calculate the degrees of freedom, we need to know the sample sizes of both the control and treatment groups.

Since there are 9 participants in the treatment group and 8 in the control group, the degrees of freedom would be:

[tex]df = n_control + n_treatment - 2[/tex]

df = 8 + 9 - 2

df = 15

To find the observed t-value, we first need to calculate the mean and standard deviation of each group.

For the control group:

Mean = (48 + 50 + 52 + 46 + 45 + 53 + 44 + 51 + 49) / 8 = 48.375

Standard deviation = 3.885

For the treatment group:

Mean = (55 + 58 + 61 + 63 + 57 + 59 + 60 + 62 + 56) / 9 = 59

Standard deviation = 3.178

The observed t-value can now be calculated as:

[tex]t = (\bar{x}_treatment - \bar{x}_control) / (s_p * \sqrt{(1/n_treatment + 1/n_control)} )[/tex]

where [tex]s_p[/tex]is the pooled standard deviation and is given by:

[tex]s_p = \sqrt{(((n_control - 1) * s_control^2}[/tex] [tex]+\sqrt{ (n_treatment - 1) * s_treatment^2) / (n_control + n_treatment - 2))}[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]s_p = sqrt(((8 - 1) * 3.885^2 + (9 - 1) * 3.178^2) / (8 + 9 - 2))[/tex]

[tex]s_p = 3.516[/tex]

[tex]t = (59 - 48.375) / (3.516 * \sqrt{(1/9 + 1/8))}[/tex]

t = 3.14

The observed t-value is 3.14.

Finally, to find the lower bound of the 95% Confidence Interval for the difference in means, we can use the formula:

[tex]CI = (\bar{x}_treatment - \bar{x}_control)+/-(t_critical * s_p * sqrt(1/n_treatment + 1/n_control))[/tex]

where [tex]t_critical[/tex] is the t-value corresponding to a 95% confidence level with the degrees of freedom calculated above, i.e. [tex]t_critical[/tex]= 2.131.

Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = (59 - 48.375) ± (2.131 * 3.516 * [tex]\sqrt{(1/9 + 1/8)}[/tex])

CI = 10.625 ± 4.398

Therefore, the lower bound of the 95% Confidence Interval for the difference in means is:

59 - 48.375 - 4.398 = 6.227.

So we can say with 95% confidence that the increase in favorability scores due to the ad campaign is at least 6.227 points.

For similar question on Interval.

https://brainly.com/question/15007813

#SPJ11

The statement is true.

We can use the chain rule to differentiate d/dt g(t-10) as follows:

d/dt g(t-10) = d/dt [g(t-10)] * d/dt (t-10)

= g'(t-10) * 1

= d/dt (g(t-10))

Then, since g(t) satisfies the differential equation dI/dt = 15/3 * I, we know that g'(t) = 15/3 * g(t).

Substituting t-10 for t, we have g'(t-10) = 15/3 * g(t-10), which gives us:

d/dt g(t-10) = g'(t-10) * 1 = 15/3 * g(t-10)

Therefore, the statement is true.

Equation: A declaration that two expressions with variables or integers are equal. In essence, equations are questions, and attempts to systematically identify the solutions to these questions have been the driving forces behind the creation of mathematics.

To learn more about mathematics visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15209879

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is

Step-by-step explanation:

look at the numbers on the wave graph and math it

Therefore, the antiderivative of the given function is

[tex](6/7) x^7 - (5/3) x^3 - 4x^(-3) + C,[/tex] where C is the constant of integration.

To evaluate the integral ∫(6x⁶ - 5x² - 12/x⁴) dx, we can split it into three separate integrals using the linearity of integration:

∫(6x⁶ - 5x² - 12/x⁴) dx = ∫6x⁶ dx - ∫5x² dx - ∫12/x⁴ dx

Using the power rule of integration, we can find the antiderivatives of each term:

∫6x⁶ dx = (6/7) [tex]x^7[/tex]+ C₁

∫5x² dx = (5/3)[tex]x^3[/tex] + C₂

To evaluate the integral ∫12/x⁴ dx, we can rewrite it as ∫12[tex]x^(-4)[/tex]dx and then use the power rule of integration:

∫12/x⁴ dx = ∫[tex]12x^(-4)[/tex] dx = (-12/3) [tex]x^(-3)[/tex] + C₃

= -[tex]4x^(-3)[/tex] + C₃

Putting it all together, we get:

∫(6x⁶ - 5x² - 12/x⁴) dx = (6/7) [tex]x^7[/tex] - (5/3) x^3 - 4[tex]x^(-3)[/tex] + C

Therefore, the antiderivative of the given function is

[tex](6/7) x^7 - (5/3) x^3 - 4x^(-3) + C,[/tex] where C is the constant of integration.

Learn more about antiderivative ,

https://brainly.com/question/31385327

#SPJ4

Answer:

b. Greater than 6.5

Step-by-step explanation:

1 cm is equal to 10 mm.

So 6.5 cm as mm is 6.5 × 10 = 65 mm

The national consumption function is C(y) = 0.7y + dy² + 0.9 - 3dy.

We have,

The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is defined as the change in consumption that results from a change in disposable income.

Since the question provides the marginal propensity to save, we can find the MPC by subtracting the given marginal propensity to save from 1:

MPC = 1 - ds = 1 - (0.3 - dy) = 0.7 + dy

When disposable income is $3 billion, consumption is also $3 billion.

This gives us a starting point to find the constant of integration in the consumption function:

C(y) = MPC × y + constant

3 = (0.7 + dy) × 3 + constant

constant = 3 - 2.1 - 3dy

constant = 0.9 - 3dy

Substituting this value of the constant into the consumption function, we get:

C(y) = (0.7 + dy) × y + 0.9 - 3dy

Simplifying this expression, we get:

C(y) = 0.7y + dy^2 + 0.9 - 3dy

Therefore,

The national consumption function is C(y) = 0.7y + dy² + 0.9 - 3dy.

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ4

The angle between the complex number and its conjugate is 90°, under the condition that the given complex number is Z = 1 + i. Then the correct option is Option D.

Let us consider Z as the complex number and Z' as the its  conjugate
Z = 1 + i
Z' = 1 - i
The angle between Z and its conjugate is given by
θ = [tex]tan^{-1((Im(Z) - Im(Z'))/ (Re(Z) - Re(Z')))}[/tex]

Here
Im(Z)= imaginary part of Z
Re(Z) = real part of Z.

Staging the values of Z and Z'
θ  [tex]= tan^{-1((1 - (-1))/ (1 - 1))}[/tex]
θ = [tex]tan^{-1(2/0)}[/tex]
θ = 90 degrees

Then, the angle between Z and its conjugate is 90°.
To learn more about complex number
https://brainly.com/question/29747482
#SPJ4

Using the standard normal distribution table, the value of c is approximately 17.72.

To tackle this issue, if X is normal random variable we can utilize the standard ordinary appropriation table. To start with, we want to normalize the irregular variable X utilizing the equation:

Z = (X-mu)/sigma

Where mu is the mean and sigma is the standard deviation, which is the square base of the fluctuation. Subbing the given qualities, we get:

Z = (X-18.2)/[tex]\sqrt{ 5[/tex]

Then, we really want to find the worth of Z comparing to the given likelihood of 0.5221. Looking into this likelihood in the standard typical dissemination table, we find that the comparing Z-esteem is around 0.11.

Subbing this worth into the normalized recipe and addressing for X, we get:

0.11 = (X-18.2)/[tex]\sqrt{ 5[/tex]

X-18.2 = 0.11*[tex]\sqrt{ 5[/tex]

X = 18.2+0.11*[tex]\sqrt{ 5[/tex]

X ≈ 18.72

In this manner, the worth of c is roughly 18.72-1 = 17.72.

To learn more about normal random variable, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/31388138

#SPJ4

The 98% confidence interval for the population variance is (0.775, 3.044). None of the given options match this interval exactly, but the closest one is (0.9, 4.2).

To construct a confidence interval for the population variance, we will use the chi-square distribution with (n-1) degrees of freedom, where n is the sample size. The formula for the confidence interval is:

[ (n-1)s² / chi-squared upper value, (n-1)s² / chi-squared lower value ]

where s is the sample standard deviation and the chi-squared values correspond to the upper and lower tail probabilities of (1 - confidence level)/2.

Substituting the given values, we have:

n = 20
s = 1.3
confidence level = 0.98
degrees of freedom = n - 1 = 19
chi-squared upper value with 0.01 probability = 35.172
chi-squared lower value with 0.01 probability = 8.906

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

[ (19)(1.3)² / 35.172, (19)(1.3)² / 8.906 ]

Simplifying, we get:

[ 0.775, 3.044 ]

Therefore, the 98% confidence interval for the population variance is (0.775, 3.044). None of the given options match this interval exactly, but the closest one is (0.9, 4.2).

To learn more about confidence interval here:

brainly.com/question/24131141#

#SPJ11

The resulting value of c was -2/3, which satisfies both the equation and the initial condition.

The given equation is xy + 2y = 4x², (x > 0) and we want to find the constant c such that y = x + c satisfies the equation and the initial condition (1) = 1.

Substituting y = x + c in the equation, we get (x+c)x + 2(x+c) = 4x², which simplifies to 2cx + c + 2x = 0. Factoring out c, we get c(2x+1)=-2x. Solving for c, we get c = -2x/(2x+1). Substituting x = 1, we get c = -2/3. Therefore, the constant c which produces a solution that satisfies the given equation and the initial condition is -2/3.

To solve the problem, we used the fact that the functions y = x + c are all solutions of the given equation. We then substituted y = x + c in the equation and solved for c by using the initial condition.

This method can be used to find the constant for any function that satisfies the given equation.

To know more about equation click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983#

#SPJ11

The FDR can be controlled using methods such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, which adjusts the p-values of each test to maintain the FDR at a desired level.
Overall, controlling for false significance is an important aspect of multiple testing, and choosing the appropriate metric to use depends on the research question and the desired level of control over false discoveries.

In the setting of multiple testing, controlling for false significance is crucial to ensure the validity of the results. Two commonly used metrics to control for false significance are the Family-wise error rate (FWER) and the False discovery rate (FDR).

The FWER is defined as the probability of making at least one false discovery or type I error. In other words, it is the probability of rejecting at least one true null hypothesis among a family of tests. The FWER can be controlled by using methods such as the Bonferroni correction or the Holm-Bonferroni correction, which adjust the significance level of each test to maintain the FWER at a desired level.

On the other hand, the FDR is defined as the expected fraction of false significance results among all significant results. In other words, it is the proportion of false discoveries among all discoveries. Unlike the FWER, controlling the FDR allows for some false positives while still maintaining a reasonable level of control over the overall false discovery rate. The FDR can be controlled using methods such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, which adjusts the p-values of each test to maintain the FDR at a desired level.

Overall, controlling for false significance is an important aspect of multiple testing and choosing the appropriate metric to use depends on the research question and the desired level of control over false discoveries.

learn more about Benjamini-Hochberg procedure

https://brainly.com/question/16778896

#SPJ11

To solve the given initial value problem, we can use the method of integrating factors.

The differential equation can be written in the form:

dy/dx + P(x)y = Q(x)

where P(x) = 1/(x^2+x) and Q(x) = 0.

To find the integrating factor, we multiply both sides by a function μ(x):

μ(x)dy/dx + μ(x)P(x)y = μ(x)Q(x)

We want the left-hand side to be the product rule of a derivative, so we choose μ(x) such that:

d(μ(x)y)/dx = μ(x)dy/dx + μ'(x)y

Comparing this with the left-hand side of the previous equation, we can see that we need:

μ'(x) = P(x)μ(x)

We can solve this separable differential equation as follows:

dμ(x)/dx = μ(x)/(x^2+x)

μ(x)/μ'(x) = x^2+x

ln(μ(x)) = (1/2)x^2 + x + C

μ(x) = e^(x^2/2 + x + C)

where C is a constant of integration.

Multiplying both sides of the original differential equation by the integrating factor μ(x), we get:

μ(x)dy/dx + μ(x)P(x)y = 0

Substituting the values of μ(x), P(x), and Q(x), we get:

e^(x^2/2 + x + C)dy/dx + (x^2+x)e^(x^2/2 + x + C)y = 0

Multiplying through by e^-(x^2/2 + x + C) and integrating with respect to x, we get:

y(x) = Ce^-(x^2/2 + x) + ∫e^-(x^2/2 + x) dx

To evaluate the integral, we can use the substitution u = x + 1, which gives:

∫e^-(x^2/2 + x) dx = ∫e^-(u^2/2 - 1/2) du

= e^(1/2)∫e^-(u^2/2) d(u^2/2)

= e^(1/2)∫e^-v dv (where v = u^2/2)

= -e^(1/2)e^-v + C'

= -e^(1/2)e^-(x^2/2 + x) + C'

Substituting this back into the equation for y(x), we get:

y(x) = Ce^-(x^2/2 + x) - e^(1/2)e^-(x^2/2 + x) + C'

= (C - e^(1/2))e^-(x^2/2 + x) + C'

Using the initial condition y(2) = 1, we get:

1 = (C - e^(1/2))e^-(2^2/2 + 2) + C'

= (C - e^(1/2))e^-5 + C'

Solving for C', we get:

C' = (e^(1/2) - C)e^-5 + 1

Substituting this back into the equation for y(x), we get the solution:

y(x) = (C - e^(1/2))e^-(x^2/2 + x) + (e^(1/2) - C)e^-5 + 1

learn about integration,

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11