how to write a recursive formula for 4,12,108

can you also explain how i would do it

The total amount in Bob and Ann's retirement account after 12 years will be approximately $64,022.79.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for continuous compounding:

[tex]A = Pe^{(rt)[/tex]

where A is the final amount, P is the principal amount, e is the base of the natural logarithm, r is the annual interest rate, and t is the time in years.

In this case, we have P = $3000, r = 0.098, and t = 12. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

[tex]A = 3000 * e^{(0.098 * 12)[/tex]≈ $64,022.79

Therefore, after 12 years, Bob and Ann will have approximately $64,022.79 in their retirement account if they deposit $3000 per year and the account pays interest at a rate of 9.8% compounded continuously.

To know more about  retirement account, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1813704#
#SPJ11

The correct option is (d) (0.137, 0.363). The 90% confidence interval for proportion p is about (0.137, 0.363).

The formula for a confidence interval for a population proportion:

                                      [tex]\hat{p}\±z_{\alpha/2} \sqrt{\hat{p}\frac{(1-\hat{p})}{n} }[/tex]

where [tex]$\hat{p}$[/tex] is the sample proportion, n is the sample size, and [tex]$z_{\alpha/2}$[/tex] is the critical value from the standard normal distribution for the desired confidence level as per the formula.

Then by substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]$\hat{p}$[/tex] = 10/40 = 0.25

n = 40

And for a 90% confidence interval,

                                              [tex]$\alpha[/tex] = 1 - 0.90  

                                              [tex]$\alpha[/tex] = 0.10

and the critical values are ±1.645

By substituting these values, we will get:

                                   [tex]0.25 ± 1.645\sqrt{\frac{0.25(1-0.25)}{40} }[/tex]

After simplifying this expression we get  (0.137, 0.363).

Therefore, the correct answer is (d) (0.137, 0.363).

To know  more about Confidence interval:

brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

Answer:

w = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

(3.2 + 3.3 + 3.5)w = w , that is

10w = w ( subtract w from both sides )

9w = 0 , then

w = 0

The expression "-3x² + 3x²" simplifies to 0, so the given function can be rewritten as: f(x) = -x - 1.

To find the first derivative of f(x), we use the power rule and the constant multiple rule of differentiation: f'(x) = -1. The first derivative of f(x) is simply -1, which means that the slope of the tangent line to the graph of f(x) is constant and equal to -1 for all values of x.

To find the second derivative of f(x), we differentiate the first derivative:

f''(x) = 0. The second derivative of f(x) is 0, which means that the graph of f(x) is a straight line with a constant slope of -1, and it has no curvature or inflection points.

When we graph f(x), f'(x), and f''(x) using a graphing calculator or software, we can see that the graph of f(x) is a straight line with a negative slope of -1, as expected. The graph of f'(x) is a horizontal line at y = -1, which confirms that the slope of f(x) is constant. The graph of f''(x) is a horizontal line at y = 0, which confirms that f(x) has no curvature or inflection points.

The analysis of the first and second derivatives of f(x) reveals that the function is a straight line with a constant negative slope, and it has no curvature or inflection points.

Learn more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ4

Based on the mentioned informations and provided values, the value of  the function g'(3a)  is calculate to be equal to 11/21.

We can start by applying the chain rule to find the derivative of g(x) with respect to x:

g'(x) = (1/7) f'(x/3) (1/3)

Note that the factor of 1/3 comes from the chain rule, since we are differentiating with respect to x but the argument of f is x/3.

Next, we can substitute x = 3a to find g'(3a):

g'(3a) = (1/7) f'(3a/3) (1/3)

= (1/7) f'(a) (1/3)

= (1/7) (11) (1/3)

= 11/21

Therefore, g'(3a) = 11/21.

Learn more about function :

https://brainly.com/question/29775037

#SPJ4

The possible values of the constant k that give the function y = x^4 – 2kx^3 - 10x^2 + k^2x a local extrema at x = 1 are k = 8 and k = -2.

To find the possible value(s) of the constant k that give the function y = x^4 – 2kx^3 - 10x^2 + k^2x a local extrema at x = 1, we need to take the derivative of the function and set it equal to 0:

y' = 4x^3 - 6kx^2 - 20x + k^2

At x = 1, this becomes:

4 - 6k - 20 + k^2 = 0

Simplifying:

k^2 - 6k - 16 = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

k = 3 ± √25

So the possible values of k are k = 8 and k = -2.

To check that these values give a local extrema at x = 1, we can use the second derivative test. Taking the second derivative of the function:

y'' = 12x^2 - 12kx - 20

At x = 1, this becomes:

12 - 12k - 20 = -12k - 8

For k = 8, we have y''(1) = -104, which is negative, so x = 1 is a local maximum. For k = -2, we have y''(1) = 8, which is positive, so x = 1 is a local minimum.

Know more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The coefficient of determination is approximately 0.7167.

To calculate the coefficient of determination (R²), we first need to find the correlation coefficient (r). The given statistics are not clearly labeled, so I will assume the following:
- ΣX = 324
- ΣY = 393
- ΣX² = 15210
- ΣY² = 17150
- ΣXY = 2599

Now, let's find the correlation coefficient (r) using the formula:

r = (n * ΣXY - ΣX * ΣY) / sqrt((n * ΣX² - (ΣX)²) * (n * ΣY² - (ΣY)²))

Where n is the number of households (10 in this case).

Plugging the given values into the formula:

r = (10 * 2599 - 324 * 393) / sqrt((10 * 15210 - 324²) * (10 * 17150 - 393²))

After calculating, we get:

r ≈ 0.8468

Now, we can find the coefficient of determination (R²) by squaring the correlation coefficient (r):

R² = r² = (0.8468)²

R² ≈ 0.7167

Therefore, the coefficient of determination is approximately 0.7167.

To learn more about coefficient of determination visit : https://brainly.com/question/13409818

#SPJ11

Answer:

y = 3x - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

here slope m = 3 , then

y = 3x + c ← is the partial equation

to find c substitute (3, 7 ) into the partial equation

7 = 3(3) + c = 9 + c ( subtract 9 from both sides )

- 2 = c

y = 3x - 2 ← equation of line

The problem statement as written does not have a solution.

Let the total number of incoming freshmen be [tex]$n$[/tex]. When they are lined up in columns of 23, we know that [tex]$n$[/tex] is one less than a multiple of 23 since there are 22 people in the last column. Therefore, we can write:

[tex]$$n=23 a-1$$[/tex]

for some integer a Similarly, when they are lined up in columns of 21 , we know that n is two less than a multiple of 21 since there are 14 people in the last column. Therefore, we can write:

[tex]$$n=21 b-2$$[/tex]

for some integer b.

We want to solve for n. One approach is to use modular arithmetic. We can rewrite the first equation as:

[tex]$$n+1 \equiv 0(\bmod 23)$$[/tex]

which means that [tex]$n+1$[/tex] is a multiple of 23. Similarly, we can rewrite the second equation as:

[tex]$n+2 \equiv 0(\bmod 21)$[/tex]

which means that n+2 is a multiple of 21 .

We can use these congruences to eliminate n and solve for the unknown integers a and b. Subtracting the second congruence from the first, we get:

[tex]$$n+1-(n+2) \equiv 0(\bmod 23)-(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

which simplifies to:

[tex]$$-1 \equiv 2(\bmod 23)-(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

or equivalently:

[tex]$$-1 \equiv 2(\bmod 2)$$[/tex]

This is a contradiction, so there is no solution in integers. Therefore, something must be wrong with the problem statement.

One possibility is that there is a typo and the number of people in the last column of the lineup of 23 should be 21 instead of 22. In that case, we would have:

[tex]$$n=23 a-2$$[/tex]

and

[tex]$$n=21 b-7$$[/tex]

Using modular arithmetic as before, we get:

[tex]$$n+2 \equiv 0(\bmod 23)$$[/tex]

and

[tex]$$n+7 \equiv 0(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

Subtracting the second congruence from the first, we get:

[tex]$$n+2-(n+7) \equiv 0(\bmod 23)-(\bmod 21)$$[/tex]

which simplifies to:

[tex]$$-5 \equiv 2(\bmod 2)$$[/tex]

This is another contradiction, so this possibility is also not valid.

Therefore, the problem statement as written does not have a solution.

To learn more about arithmetic visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11559160

#SPJ11

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are: var1 = 26.476 var2 = 27.524 ,  Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are: var1 = 33.538 ,var2 = 35.333 , Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are: var1 = 27.381, var2 = 30.833 , The data will tend to be more tightly clustered around it, resulting in a smaller variance.

To compute the variance estimates for Data Set A using the definitional formula provided:

a) Using the sample mean for Data Set A:

First, we need to calculate the sample mean for each column of the data set:

x1 = (23 + 13 + 13 + 7 + 9 + 19 + 11 + 19 + 15 + 14 + 17 + 21 + 21 + 17) / 14

  = 15.14

x2 = (19 + 7 + 19 + 19 + 14 + 21 + 17) / 7

  = 16.43

Using these sample means, we can calculate the variance of each column using the definitional formula:

var1 = [tex][(23-15.14)^2 + (13-15.14)^2 + ... + (21-15.14)^2] / 13[/tex]

    = 26.48

var2 =[tex][(19-16.43)^2 + (7-16.43)^2 + ... + (17-16.43)^2] / 6[/tex]

    = 27.52

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are:

var1 = 26.476

var2 = 27.524

b) Using a mean score of 15:

Using a mean score of 15, we can calculate the variance of each column using the same formula as in part (a), but with the mean score of 15 substituted for the sample mean:

var1 = [tex][(23-15)^2 + (13-15)^2 + ... + (21-15)^2] / 13[/tex]

    = 33.54

var2 = [tex][(19-15)^2 + (7-15)^2 + ... + (17-15)^2] / 6[/tex]

    = 35.33

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are:

var1 = 33.538

var2 = 35.333

c) Using a mean score of 16:

Using a mean score of 16, we can calculate the variance of each column using the same formula as in part (b), but with the mean score of 16 substituted for 15:

var1 = [tex][(23-16)^2 + (13-16)^2 + ... + (21-16)^2] / 13[/tex]

    = 27.38

var2 = [tex][(19-16)^2 + (7-16)^2 + ... + (17-16)^2] / 6[/tex]

    = 30.83

Rounded to 3 decimal places, the variance estimates are:

var1 = 27.381

var2 = 30.833

d) Conclusions:

The variance estimates are sensitive to the choice of mean score used in the calculations. In general, the variance estimates will be larger when a mean score that is lower than the sample mean is used, and smaller when a mean score that is higher than the sample mean is used. This is because the variance measures the spread of the data around the mean, and if the mean is shifted higher, the data will tend to be more tightly clustered around it, resulting in a smaller variance. Similarly, if the mean is shifted lower, the data will tend to be more spread out, resulting in a larger variance.

Learn more about sample mean,

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

To answer this question, we will use the concepts of mean number and standard deviation in the context of a binomial distribution. In this case, the number of trials (n) is 65, and the probability of success (learning to push the lever) is 0.70.

(a) Find the mean number of rats that will learn to push the lever:

Mean (µ) = n * p
Mean (µ) = 65 * 0.70
Mean (µ) = 45.5

So, on average, 45.5 rats will learn to push the lever.

(b) Find the standard deviation of the number of rats that will learn to push the lever:

Standard Deviation (σ) = √(n * p * q)
Where q is the probability of failure (1 - p)

In this case, q = 1 - 0.70 = 0.30

Standard Deviation (σ) = √(65 * 0.70 * 0.30)
Standard Deviation (σ) = √(13.65)
Standard Deviation (σ) ≈ 3.69

The standard deviation of the number of rats that will learn to push the lever is approximately 3.69 (rounded to two decimal places).

To learn more about standard deviation : brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ11

Answer:

Unit Conversion:

l≈3.35m

w≈0.2m

Solution

P=2(l+w)=2·(3.35+0.2)=7.112m

P=280

Answer: 38 in

Step-by-step explanation:

8+8+(11 x 12) + (11x12)

16 + 132 + 132

280

As n approaches infinity, -72n^2 also approaches infinity. The natural logarithm of infinity is also infinity. Therefore, the limit of the sequence diverges: lim(n→∞) c_n = ∞ Your answer: DIV

To determine the limit or divergence of the sequence c_n = ln(4n - 7)/(6n + 4), we can use the limit laws and theorems of calculus.

First, we can simplify the expression inside the natural logarithm by factoring out 4n from the numerator and denominator:

c_n = ln(4n(1 - 7/(4n)))/(2(3n + 2))
c_n = ln(4n) + ln(1 - 7/(4n)) - ln(2) - ln(3n + 2)

Next, we can use the fact that ln(x) is a continuous function to take the limit inside the natural logarithm:

lim n→∞ ln(4n) = ln(lim n→∞ 4n) = ln(infinity) = infinity

lim n→∞ ln(2) = ln(2)

Using the theorem that the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, we can add the last two terms together and simplify:

lim n→∞ c_n = infinity - ln(2) - lim n→∞ ln(3n + 2)/(6n + 4)

Finally, we can use L'Hopital's Rule to evaluate the limit of the natural logarithm fraction:

lim n→∞ ln(3n + 2)/(6n + 4) = lim n→∞ (1/(3n + 2))/(6/(6n + 4))
= lim n→∞ (2/(18n + 12)) = 0

Therefore, the limit of c_n as n approaches infinity is:

lim n→∞ c_n = infinity - ln(2) - 0 = infinity

Since the limit of the sequence is infinity, the sequence diverges. Therefore, the answer is DIV.
Let's determine the limit of the sequence or show that it diverges using the appropriate Limit Laws or theorems.

Given sequence: c_n = ln(4n - 76n + 4)

We need to find: lim(n→∞) c_n

Step 1: Rewrite the sequence
c_n = ln(4n - 76n + 4)

Step 2: Factor out the highest power of n in the argument of the natural logarithm
c_n = ln(n^2 (4/n - 76 + 4/n^2))

Step 3: Calculate the limits of each term in the parentheses as n→∞
lim(n→∞) 4/n = 0
lim(n→∞) 4/n^2 = 0

Step 4: Replace the terms with their limits
c_n = ln(n^2 (4 - 76 + 0))

Step 5: Simplify the expression
c_n = ln(-72n^2)

As n approaches infinity, -72n^2 also approaches infinity. The natural logarithm of infinity is also infinity. Therefore, the limit of the sequence diverges:

lim(n→∞) c_n = ∞

Your answer: DIV

Learn more about L'Hopital's Rule here: brainly.com/question/29480665

#SPJ11

The limit of the sequence cn as n approaches infinity is ln(2/3).

We can use the limit laws to determine the limit of the sequence cn = ln(4n -7)/(6n + 4) as n approaches infinity.

First, we can simplify the expression inside the natural logarithm by dividing both the numerator and denominator by n:

cn = ln((4n/n) - (7/n))/((6n/n) + (4/n))

cn = ln(4 - 7/n)/(6 + 4/n)

As n approaches infinity, both 7/n and 4/n approach zero, so we have:

cn = ln(4 - 0)/(6 + 0)

cn = ln(4/6)

cn = ln(2/3)

Therefore, the limit of the sequence cn as n approaches infinity is ln(2/3).

Learn more about limit;

https://brainly.com/question/30679261

#SPJ4

According to the information, the order of the ribbons from the lowest to the highest would be: 1.73, 2.23, 3.13, 3.46

To find the root of a number we can use different methods such as:

According to the above information, the results of the roots would be:

1.73 = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

2.23 = [tex]\sqrt{5}[/tex]

3.13 = π

3.46 = [tex]2\sqrt{3}[/tex]

So the order from lowest to highest of the ribbons according to their value would be:

1.73, 2.23, 3.13, 3.46

Learn more about roots in: https://brainly.com/question/16932620

#SPJ1

the cost of a pencil is $0.75.

What is an Equations?

Equations are statements in mathematics that have two algebraic expressions separated by an equals (=) sign, showing that both sides are equal. Solving equations helps determine the value of an unknown variable. On the other hand, if a statement lacks the "equal to" symbol, it is not an equation but an expression.

The total cost for Sarah would be:

3x + 2(x + 0.25) + 2(1.75) = 6.5 + 5x

The total cost for Kaya would be:

5x + (x + 0.25) + 3(1.75) = 10.25 + 6x

So we have the equation:

10.25 + 6x = 6.5 + 5x + 1.8

Simplifying this equation, we get:

x = 0.75

Therefore, the cost of a pencil is $0.75. The equations that can be solved to find the cost of a pencil are: 3x + 2(x + 0.25) + 2(1.75) = 6.5 + 5x and 5x + (x + 0.25) + 3(1.75) = 10.25 + 6x

Learn more about equations, by the following link

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ4

This value is approximately equal to -0.726. To use the sequence of partial sums to prove convergence, we need to find the limit of the sequence of partial sums. The partial sum for the first n terms of the series is:

Sn = Ση=4n 5/n2-31

We want to show that this sequence of partial sums converges to some limit L. To do this, we can use the fact that the series is absolutely convergent. This means that the series of absolute values converges, which implies that the series itself converges. We can see that the series of absolute values is:

Ση=4n |5/n2-31|

Since all terms are positive, we can drop the absolute value signs:

Ση=4n 5/n2-31

Now, we can use the comparison test to show that this series converges. We know that:

5/n2-31 < 5/n2

Therefore, we can compare our series to the series:

Ση=1∞ 5/n2

which we know converges by the p-test. Since the terms of our series are smaller than the terms of the convergent series, our series must also converge.

Now that we have shown that the series converges, we can find its limit L by taking the limit of the sequence of partial sums. That is:

lim n→∞ Ση=4n 5/n2-31 = L

We can use the fact that the series is absolutely convergent to rearrange the terms of the series:

Ση=4n 5/n2-31 = Ση=1n 5/η2-31 - Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31

The second series on the right-hand side is a convergent series, so it must have a finite sum. Therefore, as n approaches infinity, the sum of the first series on the right-hand side approaches the sum of the entire series:

lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31 = L + Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31

Solving for L, we get:

L = lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31 - Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31

Since we know that the second series on the right-hand side has a finite sum, we can evaluate it:

Ση=1∞ 5/η2-31 = 5/1-31 + 5/4-31 + 5/9-31 + ...

This is a convergent p-series with p=2, so we can evaluate it using the formula:

Ση=1∞ 1/η2 = π2/6

Substituting this value into our expression for L, we get:

L = lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31 - π2/6

We can evaluate the limit using the integral test:

∫1∞ 5/x2-31 dx = lim n→∞ Ση=1n 5/η2-31

This integral evaluates to:

lim t→∞ 5/sqrt(31)(arctan(sqrt(31)/t) - arctan(sqrt(31)))

= 5/sqrt(31) * π/2

Therefore, our final answer is:

L = 5/sqrt(31) * π/2 - π2/6

Note that this value is approximately equal to -0.726.

Learn more about partial here:

https://brainly.com/question/31495179

#SPJ11

The answer is (C) 0.054. 

Regularly a binomial probability issue, where we are captivated by the probability of getting five left-handers in a course of 93 understudies, given that the probability of an individual being left-handed is 0.15.

The condition for the binomial probability spread is:

P(X = k) = (n select k) * [tex]p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)[/tex]

where:

P(X = k) is the likelihood of getting k triumphs (in our case, k left-handers)

n is the general number of trials (in our case, the degree of the lesson, 93)

p is the probability of triumph on each trial (in our case, the probability of an individual being left-handed, 0.15)

(n select k) is the binomial coefficient, which speaks to the number of ways of choosing k objects from a set of n objects.

Utilizing this condition, able to calculate the probability of finding five left-handers in a lesson of 93 understudies:

P(X = 5) = (93 select 5) * [tex]0.15^5 * (1 - 0.15)^(93 - 5)[/tex]

P(X = 5) = 0.054

Consequently, the answer is (C) 0.054. 

To know more probability refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

The number of hose is multiplied by 8 to get the number of gallons

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The table of values

The constant, k of the ratio is calculated as

k = y/x

So, we have

k = 80/10 = 40/5.....

Evaluate

k = 8

This means that the relationship is a multiplicative relationship because the number of hose is multiplied by 8 to get the number of gallons

Hence, the true statement is (c)

Read more about ratio a

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ1

Using the three-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get I ≈ 0.0817.

(a) Using the composite trapezoidal rule with n = 1, 2, and 4, we get:
For n = 1: I ≈ (b-a) / 2 [f(a) + f(b)] = 1/2 [0 + 1/4] = 1/8
For n = 2: I ≈ (b-a) / 4 [f(a) + 2f(a+h) + f(b)] = 1/4 [0 + 1/8 + 1/4] = 3/32
For n = 4: I ≈ (b-a) / 8 [f(a) + 2f(a+h) + 2f(a+2h) + 2f(a+3h) + f(b)] = 1/8 [0 + 1/8 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/4] = 11/64

(b) Using Romberg extrapolation twice, we get:
R(1,1) = 1/8, R(2,1) = 3/32, R(4,1) = 11/64
R(2,2) = [4R(2,1) - R(1,1)] / [4 - 1] = 7/64
R(4,2) = [4R(4,1) - R(2,1)] / [4 - 1] = 59/256
So, the more accurate estimate of the integral using Romberg extrapolation twice is R(4,2) = 59/256.

(c) Using the two-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get:
I ≈ (b-a) / 2 [f((a+b)/2 - (b-a)/(2sqrt(3))) + f((a+b)/2 + (b-a)/(2sqrt(3)))]
= 1/2 [0.0728 + 0.1456] = 0.1092

(d) Using the three-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get:
I ≈ (b-a) / 2 [5/9 f((a+b)/2 - (b-a)/(2sqrt(15))) + 8/9 f((a+b)/2) + 5/9 f((a+b)/2 + (b-a)/(2sqrt(15)))]
= 1/2 [0.0146 + 0.1343 + 0.0146] = 0.0817

Therefore, using the composite trapezoidal rule, we get I ≈ 11/64. Using Romberg extrapolation twice, we get a more accurate estimate of I ≈ 59/256. Using the two-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get I ≈ 0.1092. Using the three-point Gauss quadrature formula, we get I ≈ 0.0817.

To learn more about integral, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

The arithmetic mean of this data set is: 69.88
The median of this data set is: 68.2
The mode of this data set is: 84.7

To calculate the mean, median, and mode of the given data set, follow these steps:

1. Arrange the data set in ascending order: 49.5, 56.6, 57.1, 63.8, 68.2, 69.8, 73.4, 84.7, 84.7, 84.7

2. Calculate the mean by adding all the numbers and dividing by the total count:
(49.5+56.6+57.1+63.8+68.2+69.8+73.4+84.7+84.7+84.7) / 10 = 692.5 / 10 = 69.25
Mean = 69.25

3. Calculate the median by finding the middle value(s) of the ordered data set. In this case, there are 10 numbers, so we will take the average of the two middle values (5th and 6th):
(68.2 + 69.8) / 2 = 138 / 2 = 69
Median = 69

4. Calculate the mode by identifying the number(s) that appear most frequently. In this case, 84.7 appears three times:
Mode = 84.7

Your answer: The mean of the data set is 69.25, the median is 69, and the mode is 84.7.

learn more about arithmetic mean

https://brainly.com/question/13000783

#SPJ11

The particle's position at time t=0 is 3/2.

That velocity-time is the derivative of the position function, so I thought I could find the anti-derivative of v(t)

and used the given position to solve for the integration constant and then would have a formula of the position which would allow for me to solve for the t=0.

x(t)=∫sin(2t)dt

=−1/2 * cos(2t)+C

So,

time, t = π/2 ; x = 4

4 = −1/2cos(2[π/2])+C

4 = -1/2 * cos π + C

4 =  -1/2 * (-1) + C

C= 4−1/2

= 5/2

Now, put C = 5/2 to find particle position at time, t=0:

x(t) = −1/2 * cos(2t)+C

= −1/2 * cos(2(0)) + 5/2

= -1/2 + 5/2

= 3/2

Hence,  the particle's position at time t=0 is 3/2.

To know more about time check below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29610095

#SPJ1

There are no specific values of x for which the rate of change is minimum.

function, in mathematics, an expression, rule, or law that defines a relationship between one variable (the independent variable) and another variable (the dependent variable). Functions are ubiquitous in mathematics and are essential for formulating physical relationships in the sciences.

To find the value(s) of x for which the rate of change of the function f(x) = 3.75 - 5.7 + 50 - 7 is minimum, first, we need to simplify the function:

f(x) = 3.75 - 5.7 + 50 - 7
f(x) = -1.95 + 43
f(x) = 41.05

Since the function f(x) is a constant function, its rate of change is always 0, and it does not have a minimum or maximum value.

Know more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/21145944

#SPJ11

To find the expected value of a random variable, we multiply each possible value of the variable by its probability and then add up the products.
So, the expected value of X can be calculated as:
E(X) = (0)(0.5) + (1)(0.2) + (2)(0.3)
    = 0 + 0.2 + 0.6
    = 0.8
Therefore, the answer is c. 0.80.

Learn more about Expected Value here:

https://brainly.com/question/31581872

#SPJ11

The answer is indeterminate.

To determine whether an instrument with 8 questions (or variables) is internally consistent, we typically use a measure of internal consistency called Cronbach's alpha. Cronbach's alpha is a measure of how closely related a set of variables are as a group. It measures the extent to which the variables in a scale are related or correlated to each other.

Cronbach's alpha ranges between 0 and 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect internal consistency (all variables are highly correlated), while a value of 0 indicates no internal consistency (all variables are independent of each other).

The value of Cronbach's alpha is typically interpreted as follows:

0.9 or higher: excellent internal consistency

0.8-0.9: good internal consistency

0.7-0.8: acceptable internal consistency

0.6-0.7: questionable internal consistency

0.5-0.6: poor internal consistency

0.5 or lower: unacceptable internal consistency

Without knowing the value of Cronbach's alpha for the 8-item instrument, we cannot determine whether the scale is internally consistent or not. Therefore, the answer is indeterminate.

To learn more about  indeterminate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30023647

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Law of Cosines

c^2 = a^2 + b^2  - 2 ab cosΦ

for this example   c = 8     a = 16     b = 17    Φ= Angle C

  you are trying to solve for Angle C

8^2 = 16^2 + 17^2 - 2 (16)(17) cos C

-481 = -2 (16)(17) cos C

.88419 = cos C

arccos ( .884190 ) = C = 27.8 degrees

The implications of this analysis for the advertising agency are the advertising agency should strive to create commercials that appeal to both men and women, taking into account the differences in their television viewing habits. The option (c) is correct.

To test the manager's claim that there is a significant gender difference in television viewing, we need to conduct a t-test for independent means. The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the amount of television watched between men and women, while the alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference.

The t-test for independent means gives us a t-value of -2.44, which is significant at the .05 level. This means that we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant gender difference in television viewing.

In terms of implications for the advertising agency, it would be wise to consider the differences in television viewing habits between men and women when creating commercials. Based on the data, women watch more television on average than men, so the agency may want to tailor their commercials more towards the interests and needs of women. This does not mean that men should be ignored entirely, as they still make up a significant portion of the viewing audience.

Learn more about advertising here:

https://brainly.com/question/29564877

#SPJ4

The  function  [tex]Q(t)=8^t^/^3[/tex]  is exponential and values of a is 1 and b is  [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

Yes, the function [tex]Q(t)=8^t^/^3[/tex] is exponential.

We can write it in the form [tex]f(t) = ab^t[/tex],

where: a = Q(0) = [tex]8^(^0^/^3^)[/tex]

= 8⁰

= 1

b = [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

Therefore, the function Q(t) in the form of [tex]f(t) = ab^t[/tex],is:

f(t) = 1 × [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)^t[/tex]

[tex]f(t) = 8^(^t^/^3^)[/tex]

So, values a = 1 and b = [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

Hence, the given function  [tex]Q(t)=8^t^/^3[/tex]  is exponential and values of a is 1 and b is  [tex]8^(^1^/^3^)[/tex]

To learn more on Functions click:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ4

Is the function Q(t) = 8^(t/3) exponential?

If yes, write the function in the form of f(t)=ab^t and enter the values of a and b

The value of B and C for barium(Ba) is 146 and 56 respectively .

Given,

239/94 Pu + 1/0 n ⇒ B/C Ba + 91/38 Sr + 3 1/0 n

Sum of mass number in reactant side is 239+1=240

Sum of atomic number in reactant side is 94+0=94

so the product side sum of mass number should also be 240 and that of atomic number should be 94 .

So to calculate the mass number of barium,

B + 91 + 3*1 = 240

B = 146

Next to calculate the atomic number,

C + 38 + 3*0 = 94

C = 56

Thus the value of atomic number (C) and mass  number (B) is 56 and 146 respectively .

know more about nuclear fission,

https://brainly.com/question/913303

#SPJ12

1. The equation of the sphere is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 + z^2 = 64[/tex].

2. The equation of the cone is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = z^2[/tex].

3. The equation of the circular cylinder is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 0[/tex].

We have,

The given parametric curve is:

x(t) = 4 sin(2t)

y(t) = -4 (cos(2t) + 1)

z(t) = 8 cos(t)

1)

The sphere of equation A:

A sphere equation in general form is given by:

[tex](x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 + (z - c)^2 = r^2[/tex]

where (a, b, c) is the center of the sphere, and r is the radius.

Comparing the given parametric equations with the general form of the sphere equation, we have:

[tex](x - 0)^2 + (y - (-4))^2 + (z - 0)^2 = (8)^2[/tex]

Simplifying and rearranging, we get:

[tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 + z^2 = 64[/tex]

This is the equation of a sphere centered at the origin with a radius of 8.

2)

The cone of equation B:

A cone equation in general form is given by:

[tex](x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = c^2(z - h)^2[/tex]

where (a, b, h) is the vertex of the cone, and c is a constant that determines the slope of the cone.

Comparing the given parametric equations with the general form of the cone equation, we have:

[tex](x - 0)^2 + (y - (-4))^2 = (z - 0)^2[/tex]

Simplifying and rearranging, we get:

[tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = z^2[/tex]

This is the equation of a cone with a vertex at the origin and slope 1.

3)

The circular cylinder of equation C:

A circular cylinder equation in general form is given by:

[tex](x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2[/tex]

where (a, b) is the center of the base circle of the cylinder, and r is the radius of the base circle.

Comparing the given parametric equations with the general form of the cylinder equation, we have:

[tex](x - 0)^2 + (y - (-4))^2 = 0[/tex]

This simplifies to:

[tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 0[/tex]

This equation has no real solutions, which means the given parametric curve does not lie on a circular cylinder with a non-zero radius.

Thus,

1. The equation of the sphere is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 + z^2 = 64[/tex].

2. The equation of the cone is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = z^2[/tex].

3. The equation of the circular cylinder is [tex]x^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 0[/tex].

Learn more about Sphere here:

https://brainly.com/question/12390313

#SPJ4