Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Federal Protective Service (FPS) has noted that the contract (or private) security guards they hire are often ill equiped to monitor X-ray and metal detection equipment to detect firearms, which represent machines and tools they use every day. What do these FPS reports indicate for people in private security
These Federal Protective Service (FPS) reports indicate that people in private security require better training and equipment than they currently receive.
The private security guards will improve their protective security services with increased training on reading and monitoring X-ray and metal detection equipment.
According to available records, the Federal Protective Service is the uniformed security police division of the United States Department of Homeland Security. The FPS prevents, protects, responds to, and recovers from terrorism, criminal acts, and other hazards threatening the U.S. Government's critical infrastructure, services, and the people who provide or receive them.
Thus, the FPS provides essential protective services and reports to improve protective services.
Related link: https://brainly.com/question/18187050
Communications Technology normally
involves doing what while using
technology?
A. repairing equipment
B. coordinating action
C. long-distance calls
I need an answer now pls and thanks
In the early history of law enforcement in England a Shire Reeve was a ?
a. document authorizing an arrest
b. fugitive from justice
c. tribunal that passed judgments and imposed sentences
d. law enforcement officer
Answer:
D. Law Enforcement Officer
Explanation:
A Shire Reeve was a local government official, in charge of a shire or county (as in Lancashire, Yorkshire etc.) It is the derivation of the word sheriff.
Please mark brainliest if this helped you!
Name at least ten issues that Bob and Carol should talk about.
Answer:
There kids they money there marriage
Explanation:
The United States Supreme Court has the power of judicial review because
Answer:
Because it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of the government recognizes the limit of it's own power
Answer:
I hope this helped.
Explanation:
Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution. Rather, the power to declare laws unconstitutional has been deemed an implied power.
Select the correct text in the passage.
Which sentences describe a non-judicial punishment?
The intent of the UCMJ was to provide consistent legal enforcement across all branches of the Military. Commanders are authorized by Article
15 of the UCMJ to administratively discipline troops. In the Navy, this procedure is called a "Captain's Mast," and in the Air Force it is called "Office
Hours." When a service member violates military laws and regulations, it is the job of commissioned officers and the enlisted personnel who
support them to ensure that fair and appropriate punishment is administered.
Answer:
"When a service member violates military laws and regulations, it is the job of commissioned officers and the enlisted personnel who support them to ensure that fair and appropriate punishment is administered" Describes a non-judicial punishment.
I hope this helped at all, sorry if it is incorrect.Certain persons must give their name when reporting child abuse
Margo is a 20-year-old college student who was recently arrested for shoplifting. Shortly after her arrest, she was not subjected to any unusual or cruel treatment or punishment. The next morning, the judge set her bail at $2,000; her brother posted her bail, and Margo was released. Because Margo could not afford her own attorney, one was appointed to represent her at her court date approximately one month later. When Margo appeared in court, she admitted the crime. Because this was her first criminal offense, the judge probated her sentence and allowed her to perform community service instead of jail time. In examining Margo's arrest and involvement with the criminal legal process, what worked toward her benefit? Also identify any constitutional amendments that benefited her in this situation.
Answer:
I've been tryna call
I've been on my own for long enough
Maybe you can show me how to love, maybe
I'm going through withdrawals
You don't even have to do too much
You can turn me on with just a touch, baby
I look around and
Sin City's cold and empty (oh)
No one's around to judge me (oh)
I can't see clearly when you're gone
I said, ooh, I'm blinded by the lights
No, I can't sleep until I feel your touch
I said, ooh, I'm drowning in the night
Oh, when I'm like this, you're the one I trust
(Hey, hey, hey)
I'm running out of time
'Cause I can see the sun light up the sky
So I hit the road in overdrive, baby, oh
The city's cold and empty (oh)
No one's around to judge me (oh)
I can't see clearly when you're gone
I said, ooh, I'm blinded by the lights
No, I can't sleep until I feel your touch
I said, ooh, I'm drowning in the night
Oh, when I'm like this, you're the one I trust
I'm just walking by to let you know (by to let you know)
I can never say it on the phone (say it on the phone)
Will never let you go this time (ooh)
I said, ooh, I'm blinded by the lights
No, I can't sleep until I feel your touch
(Hey, hey, hey)
I said, ooh, I'm blinded by the lights
No, I can't sleep until I feel your touch
laws play a bigger role than parents do, when it comes to teen driving
Answer:
Yes because there are laws to prevent teen driving after a certain time.
Explanation:
Answer:
Not sure what the question is but this is true
Who is the JA director of the ReaperAaron BA?
Answer:
What is JA, ReaperAaron, and BA?
Explanation:
how do you understand the due process as a right.
evaluate federalism in Ethiopia
Explanation: Ethnic federalism, multi-ethnic or multi-national federalism, is quite self explanatory, it is an ethnic based federal system of national government, which the federated regional or state units are defined by ethnicity. This type of federation has been implemented by Meles Zenawi in the 1990s in Ethiopia.
As for Ethiopia, it gives them a better understanding of local issues and demands, their central government has no true way to understand the issues, demands and changes needed to be made in every area of the country, federalism helps them gage in the areas needed to help with these issues, demands and changes.
A towns zoning code requires most signs on private property to be smaller than four square feet. However the code does not limit
Answer:
What is the difference between zoning and building codes?
In a nutshell, zoning requirements determine how you can use the land and what type of structures can be built (i.e. residential, commercial, etc.), while building requirements (or codes) are a set of standards that all structures must meet to ensure safety.
Explanation:
EASY//
After complaining directly to the company about a faulty product, the next
step in hling a consumer complaint is to
A. post a review on social media
D. nle a lawsuit against the company
O C. complain to the state government
a
D. complain to a consumer protection agency
Answer:
D
Explanation:
D, because if the faulty product is hazardous and can cause problems for the comsumer/customer; then it makes sense to file a lawsuit.
For example if the product has fake advertisment, or mis-leasding lables or a high level of harmful material.
(But you can be a Karen and post a review, that works too)
Complain to a consumer protection agency is the next step of complaining after complaining directly to the company about a faulty product. Hence, option D is correct.
Why it is important to complain in the company?Complaint in the company is important so that they can replace or give compensation in exchange for the good.
Complaining to the company is also important to let them know about their product's quality and services. For instance, if the product has false advertising, misleading labels, or contains a lot of dangerous substances.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about important to complain in the company, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13682645
#SPJ5
Why is the concept of a good critical to UCC law? Provide an example with a brief explanation thereof
Answer:UCC § 2–105 defines goods as follows: (1) "Goods" means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action.
Explanation:
Johnny was a child that went into foster care at birth and lived with three different foster families by the end of his first year of life. Johnny was very fortunate that each of the three foster homes he was placed in had warm and attentive caregivers. Johnny was placed with his 4th foster family at age 1.5 and was then adopted by that family . Given what we know about the factors that affect attachment security, which statement about Johnny's attachment style is most likely to be true ? a. Johnny will develop a secure attachment to his adoptive parents by age 2, given they provide warm and attentive caregiving. b Johnny may have a harder time forming secure attachments to his adoptive parents , but may over time given they provide warm and attentive caregiving . Oc Johnny will not form secure attachments to his adoptive parents regardless of their parenting practices . d. Johnny will form secure attachments with each of the foster families and his adoptive parents given they all provided warm and attentive caregiving .
Answer:
B or D
Explanation:
vì sao lại phải quy định những nơi sử dụng lao động không được đình công tại điều 209 bộ luật lao động năm 2019
What kinds of reforms would make the bureaucracy more accountable to the public
Answer:
Bureaucratic reform in the United States was a major issue in the late nineteenth century at the national level and in the early twentieth century at the state level. Proponents denounced the distribution of office by the winners of elections to their supporters as corrupt and inefficient. They demanded nonpartisan scientific methods and credentials be used to select civil servants. The five important civil service reforms were the two Tenure of Office Acts of 1820 and 1867, the Pendleton Act of 1883, the Hatch Acts (1939 and 1940), and the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) of 1978.
In 1801, President Thomas Jefferson, alarmed that Federalists dominated the civil service and the army, identified the party affiliation of office holders, and systematically appointed Republicans. President Andrew Jackson in 1829 began the systematic rotation of office holders after four years, replacing them with his own partisans. By the 1830s, the “spoils system” referred to the systematic replacement of office holders every time the government changed party hands.
The Civil Service Reform Act (the Pendleton Act) is an 1883 federal law that established the United States Civil Service Commission. It eventually placed most federal employees on the merit system and marked the end of the so-called “spoils system. ” Drafted during the Chester A. Arthur administration, the Pendleton Act served as a response to President James Garfield’s assassination by a disappointed office seeker.
What are some of the major changes the UCC makes in the common law of contract regarding offers and acceptance? Is it easier for contract formation (offer and acceptance elements being satisfied). Why or why not?
Answer: The UCC applies to the sale of goods and securities, whereas the common law of contracts generally applies to contracts for services, real estate, insurance, intangible assets, and employment. If the contract is for both the sale of goods and for services, the dominant element in the contract controls.
Explanation:
EASY//
Matt learns that someone applied for a car loan using his name. A consumer
protection agency that may be able to help him is the
A. U.S. Department of Justice
B. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
C. Better Business Bureau
D. Federal Trade Commission
The department that would be able to helpe matt if someone applied for a loan in his name is the: Federal Trade Commission
What is the federal trade commission?
This is a federal body in the United States that has the business of protecting people form unfair business practices.
To do this they would take up the case by law in order to determine who is responsible for the act.
Read more on the federal trade commission here: https://brainly.com/question/4716509
Answer:D Federal Trade Commission
Explanation:
Is jury good or bad?
Answer:
Jury is good just depends on who it is though
Explanation:
EASY//
Aiden has not received the foot spa that he paid for months ago. When
thinking about his rights as a consumer, Aiden is most likely concerned about
A. purchase satisfaction
B. credit card protection
C. unfair business practices
D. product safety
why structural functionalism a major perspective on deviance and crime
-sociology
Answer:i dont know really
Explanation:
Project: Lulu the Runaway Dog
Project Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog
Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you.
As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch.
Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!"
But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess?
You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them.
Marjorie's Questions:
Who was involved in the accident?
Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals?
Which duties did you breach?
Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both?
For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they?
Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer.
Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore
Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire.
To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire.
The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire.
You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case.
Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below.
Don the maintenance worker
Cassie the camper
Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee
Pete the landowner
Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.
took me 20 mintues but here
At that time little Lulu was wearing only a sweater, a ruffled skirt, and tights. After the serious punishment Lulu began to do things as her mother ordered. Chua was determined to raise an obedient Chinese child—in the West, obedience is associated with dogs and the caste system, but in Chinese culture, it is considered among the highest of virtues.
“But run where when there are 30,000 teenagers who have fled their homes in New York and only 400 emergency shelter beds, 13,000 runaways in New Jersey with a safe haven for only 300, and 10,000 in Connecticut with room for just 115? Even if a runaway finds a bed in a crisis center, where does he or she go after reaching the 30 days federal limit for sanctuary in an emergency shelter?” (Gross, 1) It is a sad thing that these are ordinary numbers, that these numbers for runaway children are realistic at all. There are not enough youth shelters, for kids to be able to flee to a haven when their home isn’t safe.
And also the fact that Curley’s wife does not have a name, but is only referred to as “Curley’s wife” and that Slim’s dog is given a name – “Lulu” – shows the reader that dogs were treated better than women at those times. The failure of Curley’s wife’s dream leads to her death, which also takes place in late afternoon, as the days ends so does her life. John Steinbeck tells us through this cyclical novel that dreams are futile.
Runaway Kids When children and teens have to deal with abuse, family, depression, or any other issues for an extensive period of time without getting the help they may run away. When a kid has these problems and they are unable to get help then why would they stick around and wait for dad to come home? The process in which our government finds and helps runaway children is not up to a standard that keeps them from falling into the streets and succumbing to sex, drugs, and violence.
Candy wants people to treat him once he is canned like this. This is because he “won’t have no place to go, an’ he can’t get no more jobs”. The other ranch hands say that he can replace the dog with one of Lulu’s pups, but of course that wouldn’t be the same, never is anyone or anything the equivalent, everyone and everything is unique.
Candy wants people to treat him once he is canned like this. This is because he “won’t have no place to go, an’ he can’t get no more jobs”. The other ranch hands say that he can replace the dog with one of Lulu’s pups, but of course that wouldn’t be the same, never is anyone or anything the equivalent, everyone and everything is unique.
1. What economic questions does this case require the townb to ask? What is a dog park and how does it benefit the community? Can people or dogs get hurt at a dog park? How will dogs fight be avoided? If a dog park is built, will there be space available for an affordable recreation facility? 2. List the possible resources that the town would need to construct and maintain the park?
This action evinces that Candy is apologising to the dog on Carlson’s behalf. Candy treats his dog like a human as his dog is his only companion. However, the workers at the ranch see him only as a dog. When Carlson mentions to Candy about shooting his dog, Candy’s actions and dialogues convey how Candy feels about this idea.
Dogs like to be free, and they like to run and play instead of being chained down. Secondly, it provides dog owners with a chance to do things with their pets that they can’t do because of limited space. Lastly, having a dog park will prove that the town is family friendly, attracting more families to the town, and for all of the reasons, a dog park should be constructed in the town of Martinsville.
Teens may turn to drugs and or drink at sometimes a very young age to cope with the hardships they face at home, school, or with personal issues. Whether they turn to them before running away and being exposed to the streets or beforehand, there is a high likelihood of it. The law about runaways differs from that of abductees.
[Original source: https://essaytoolbox.com/essay-maker]
Answer:
1. First Everybody involved is Lulu for running away. Jamie for being in the car with you. The motorist who almost got hit and messed up his bike. And the home owner who needs to repair his house. And of course the protagonist (we'll call dave).
Dave's duties were to watch Jamie. On top of that he should have been taking care of Lulu. He let Lulu escape and almost hit her, voiding this duty. He also put Jamie in danger when he was driving recklessly.
Lulu was in his care so we can assume her escaping is actual cause. Another actual cause is him letting Jamie get hurt. How ever The utility pole hitting the house can be equated to proximate cause. Same goes for the motorist messing up his car.
Jamie can be liable to basically anyone here. He hit the pole which went into the house. His reckless driving ran a dude off the road. And now Jamie's hand is likely twisted because of him. He is fully liable.
2. Danny is liable to everyone here by proximate cause . Pete's land is the land he burned. It doesn't matter that he didn't realize the consequences he still was messing with some he had not business messing with.
That campfire was near enough to Cassie's tent that she actually inhaled much smoke. This could have gave her lung damage. Many people die from smoke inhalation a year and she could have been one of them. Not only that but she was near enough to the fire that it actually consumed her tent eventually. The smoke from a fire could have actually lured her into a deeper sleep. This means that either the smoke or the fire would have killed her.
Then we have Don who was actually there when the she caught flames, to pick up his lawnmower. This puts him directly into danger. Not only that but his stuff is now burned. He most likely suffer burns considering that his shirt caught fire.
Dianne came the closest to death. She was just trying to work her when the smoke catches up to her. This causes her to have terrible asthma. Considering this that mean that her lungs may be damaged. She came the closest to death because of his recklessness.
Danny is not liable to anyone here. Pete is the one you could easiest argue he is liable to, but Cassie is liable. Cassie should have made sure that the fire was actually all the way down before she went to bed. If all he did was poke it and it reignited, that should say that it was nowhere near out. This means by proximate cause she is just as liable as him
Then we have Don. Although he may have been around when it caught fire he had an obvious window of opportunity to leave. Instead he put property over health. That was his choice. He knew the possible consequences, unlike my client who just thought that it was safe. Any damages done to himself was not a cause of Dan.
Dianne who most likely suffered the most isn't innocent either. She saw the flames and decided to stay at her job. For her own safety she should have left but she didn't. This mean that the cause here isn't Danny.
What is the difference between enumerated and implied powers?
Only implied powers are directly stated in the US Constitution.
Only enumerated powers allow the government to make laws.
Only implied powers allow the government to make laws.
Only enumerated powers are directly stated in the US Constitution.
An enumerated power is one that is given explicitly by the constitution.
Implied powers are assumed by the exercise of the enumerated powers
This means that the answer is D - Only enumerated powers are directly stated in the US Constitution. This is because, as I mentioned earlier, the enumerated powers are explicitly stated, while Implied powers are outlined and assumed based off the enumerated powers.
I hope I've helped! :)
Which organization is responsible for regulating contributions to political campaigns?
A. Federal Election Commission
В. Supreme Court
C. Congress
D Citizens United
Answer:
A. Federal Election Commission
Explanation:
The regulation which is respinsible for regulating contributions to political campaigns is the Federal Election Commission because it has jurisdiction over the financing of campaigns for the U.S. House, Senate, Presidency and the Vice Presidency.
an , bình , cường và dũng cùng nhau thành lập công ty cổ phần thái bình kinh doanh sản xất đồ gỗ
SORRY I DON'T UNDERSTAND IT
What are the considerations involved in evaluating the credibility of sources? Select all the correct answers.
A) the qualifications and reputation of the writer or organization
B) the cost to purchase the source
C) the use of supporting evidence and logical conclusions
D) the internal consistency
Answer:
C
Explanation:
what are the strengths and weaknesses of parliament
strengths:
-It is an elected and representative body
This is a strength because members of Parliament are elected to office. The laws they make should be representative of the views and values of the community, otherwise they may not be re-elected at the next election.-It responds quickly to the demands for change in the law
This is a a strength because Parliament has the power to respond to community demands for change by updating, whenever the need arises, existing areas of legislation or whole areas of the law. For example, providing more powers to police to keep the streets of Melbourne safe.-It makes law in futuro
This is a strength because Parliament does not have to wait for problems to arise; it can anticipate the needs of the community, now and into the future, and act in a way to resolve entire areas of law.-It can delegate its power
This is a strength because Parliament is able to deal with more important community matters and leave the formation of delegated legislation to bodies that have the time, expertise, resources and training. For example, allowing specific road rules to be made by VicRoads, who understands the needs of society and communities.weakness:
-It is often influenced by lobbyists and other pressure groups
This is a weakness because well organised groups that can make a lot of noise can influence government policy that represents a particular viewpoint, such as gay and lesbian lobby groups for same-sex marriage.-It is difficult to legislate in politically sensitive areas.
This is a weakness because parliament may find it difficult to make laws that have strong values or interest groups, and politicians may be concerned with an electoral backlash. For instance, both the federal and state parliaments have passed laws granting same-sex couples equal rights except for marriage.-Delegated authorities are not democratically elected
This is a weakness because other than local councils, which are elected, there are many subordinate authorities making laws. This in turn undermines the democratic principle of representative government on which our parliamentary system is structured-The process of law making can be manipulated if both Houses of Parliament are controlled by Government
This is a weakness because the Government does not necessarily need to listen to the views of the community. It is able to pass its legislation without the effective review that would normally be provided by the other house1. Which theory discussed in the lesson do you think best explains why crime happens? Why do you think that this theory is best?
Answer:
What theory did it discuss in the lesson? once you tell me then I can help.
Explanation:
