After the Civil War, Republicans in Congress wanted to ensure that the South was fully and permanently re-integrated into the United States and that African Americans in the region were granted full citizenship and voting rights. They sought to reconstruct the South in a way that would ensure civil rights and equal protection under the law for all citizens.
To achieve these goals, Republicans in Congress passed a series of Reconstruction Acts. These acts established military governments in the former Confederate states, which were required to draft new constitutions that guaranteed African American voting rights and abolished slavery. The acts also required Southern states to ratify the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States and guaranteed equal protection of the law.
In addition to these legislative actions, Republicans in Congress also established the Freedmen's Bureau, which provided assistance to former slaves and helped them transition to freedom. The bureau provided food, clothing, and medical care, established schools, and helped former slaves find employment.
Republicans in Congress also passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which granted citizenship and equal rights to African Americans, and the Enforcement Acts of 1870 and 1871, which were designed to combat violence and voter intimidation against African Americans in the South.
Overall, Republicans in Congress wanted the South to be treated as an equal part of the United States and to ensure that African Americans in the region were granted full citizenship and voting rights. They used a combination of legislative and executive actions to achieve these goals, although Reconstruction was ultimately cut short by political compromises and a lack of federal will to continue to protect the rights of African Americans in the South.
Agreeing to be a Sonderkommando guaranteed a Jewish inmate’s survival through the Holocaust. Group of answer choices
False
True
over time more and more people in western european nations wanted to break away from which of the following
People in Western European countries become more dissatisfied with colonialism and monarchial authority throughout time.
What exactly is a monarchial rule?A monarchy is a political system in which a single person has complete sovereignty or power.
The term refers to states in which the monarch, an individual ruler who acts as the head of state and is chosen by hereditary procedures, has supreme authority.
The United Kingdom is a monarchy with ceremonial powers for the king. Another case in point is Saudi Arabia, where the monarch wields absolute power.
Learn more about monarchial Rule:
https://brainly.com/question/15557719
#SPJ1
A major goal of the hutu-led regime in rwanda in mid-1994 was to.
The major goal of the Hutu-led regime in Rwanda in mid-1994 was to eliminate the Tutsi ethnic group and consolidate their power over the country.
In 1994, Rwanda was engulfed in a horrific genocide that resulted in the deaths of an estimated 800,000 people, mostly from the Tutsi ethnic group. The genocide was carried out by the Hutu-led government and militias, who had long resented the Tutsi minority for their perceived wealth and privilege.
The Hutu-led regime's primary goal during the genocide was to eliminate the Tutsi ethnic group and consolidate their power over the country. They used a combination of propaganda, violence, and intimidation to mobilize the Hutu population against the Tutsi, portraying them as a dangerous enemy that needed to be eradicated.
To know more about Rwanda , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29766839
#SPJ4
main reason why drum beats were effectively used at dawn
Coxey's Army was a response to
following the
. Its leader, Jacob Coxey, wanted the federal government to
Note that Coxey's Army was a response to high unemployment and economic hardship following the Panic of 1983 . it's leader, Jacob Coxey, wanted the federal government to create jobs by create jobs via investment into public infrastructure.
What was Coxey's army?These were a group of unemployed people that marched to the capital of the United States following the economic depression that was in the 1890s.
These people demanded that the federal government hired them to fix the bad roads that were in the country.
The movement included a march on Washington DC in 1894. It was at this time that Coxey called for the "Good Roads Bill". Although the government didn't respond to these demands, the movement at least ensured that they saw the suffering of the people.
Learn more on Coxey's army:
https://brainly.com/question/26959195
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. Complete the paragraph about Coxey's Army. following the Its leader, Jacob Coxey, v Coxey's Army was a response to _____ following the _____ . it's leader, Jacob Coxey, wanted the federal government to _______.
On the debate Harvard, junior touched on the issue of solving civic social issues either by violence or civil disobedience. Which of these two methods or ways would you choose? Give an example using current affair in South Africa of why would you choose it and of why you think it's better than others. I need 2 pages please
The choice between violence and civil disobedience to solve social issues is a complex one that should be considered carefully. In South Africa, civil disobedience has been used to challenge the status quo and bring about positive change. It is a method that respects human rights and can lead to a more inclusive and democratic society.
Regarding the debate on solving civic social issues, it is important to consider the context and specific circumstances of each case. Violence and civil disobedience are two opposing methods that have been used throughout history to achieve social change.
Violence is characterized by the use of force and aggression towards individuals or groups that oppose certain ideals or beliefs. On the other hand, civil disobedience is a peaceful way to protest and challenge the status quo by breaking the law in a nonviolent way.
In South Africa, there have been many instances of both violence and civil disobedience to fight against social issues such as racism and inequality. One current example is the protests against the arrest of former president Jacob Zuma.
Some protestors have resorted to violent methods, such as looting and damaging property, while others have chosen civil disobedience by organizing peaceful marches and sit-ins.
Although violence can sometimes bring about immediate change, it often leads to more violence and harm to innocent people. In contrast, civil disobedience can be more effective in the long run by raising awareness and putting pressure on the government to address social issues.
In my opinion, civil disobedience is a better method to solve social issues because it is a peaceful way to bring about change and it shows respect for human rights. It also creates a dialogue and can lead to a more inclusive and democratic society.
However, it is important to note that civil disobedience should be used responsibly and not put people's safety at risk.
In conclusion, the choice between violence and civil disobedience to solve social issues is a complex one that should be considered carefully. In South Africa, civil disobedience has been used to challenge the status quo and bring about positive change. It is a method that respects human rights and can lead to a more inclusive and democratic society.
To know more about civil disobedience refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9330788#
#SPJ11
3. Which of the following describes how Henry Ward Beecher attempted to support the antislavery cause in Kansas?
A. Beecher petitioned to the president and tried to encourage him to bring the conflict to an end.
B. Beecher wrote a passionate plea to the people of Kansas, which was reprinted in newspapers across the country.
C. Beecher introduced a bill to Congress which, if it had passed, would have made slavery illegal.
D. Beecher raised funds so that rifles could be purchased and sent to the antislavery supporters.
Beecher composed a passionate appeal to the people of Kansas, which was reprinted in newspapers across the country. Thus, option B is correct.
Henry Ward Beecher published a brief pamphlet titled "Defence of Kansas" in 1856. In a letter, he protested the expansion of slavery into Kansas Territory and requested assistance and encouragement for the antislavery cause. This article contains a section of the booklet.
To fight opposing slavery, several individuals travelled to the Kansas Territory. Emigrant relief societies were established in New England. They planned for anti-slavery colonists to arrive in Kansas Territory in batches.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about Beecher, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29221938
#SPJ1
Which of the following conclusions is supported by the text?
1.Nuclear power is the most efficient kind of energy for powering cities.
2.Professional athletes should study the science of energy to play better.
3.Dams power cities by converting stored potential energy into kinetic energy.
4.Drought is a serious problem for farmers in the American Southwest.
The text referenced is "Everyday Energy" by Edward I. Maxwell. The conclusions that is supported by the text is;"Nuclear power is the most efficient kind of energy for powering cities." (Option A)
What is a conclusion in literature?The conclusion paragraph should start by restating your argument, then extend out to a wider topic. Finally, make a closing statement. This paragraph follows the same pattern as your opening paragraph, progressing from specialized to generic.
The conclusion's role is to physically conclude... or to tie things up so the reader has a feeling of closure. It achieves this by stepping back from the minutiae to see the overall picture of the paper. In other words, it serves to remind the reader of the essential point.
Learn more about literature:
https://brainly.com/question/28188697
#SPJ1
Why would the white people who burned Greenwood down not want the event in textbooks?
Answer: The Greenwood massacre, also known as the Tulsa race massacre, was a violent and tragic event that occurred in 1921 in Greenwood, a prosperous African American community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. During the massacre, a white mob destroyed the entire community, burning down homes, businesses, and churches and killing an estimated 300 Black people.
There could be several reasons why some white people who were responsible for the massacre or who may have supported it would not want the event to be included in textbooks:
Guilt or shame: Some individuals may not want the event to be included in textbooks because they feel ashamed or guilty about what happened. They may not want to be associated with such a horrific event, or they may fear backlash or criticism from others.
Desire to maintain power and control: Some individuals or groups may not want the event to be included in textbooks because it could challenge their power and control over the narrative of history. Acknowledging the massacre would mean recognizing the atrocities committed against the Black community and would challenge the dominant narrative that portrays white people as the heroes of American history.
Efforts to minimize or deny the event: Some individuals or groups may want to minimize or deny the event altogether because it does not align with their worldview or political agenda. They may believe that acknowledging the event would undermine their beliefs or political positions, or they may simply not believe that the event occurred or was as severe as reported.
Overall, the reasons why some white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event to be included in textbooks are likely complex and multifaceted, involving personal, cultural, and political factors.
Explanation:
Answer:
they wanted to cover up their atrocities, escape justice, and preserve their racial and economic privilege.
Explanation:
the Tulsa race massacre was a two-day-long massacre that took place between May 31 and June 1, 1921, when mobs of white residents, some of whom had been appointed as deputies and armed by city government officials, attacked Black residents and destroyed homes and businesses of the Greenwood District in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The event remains one of the worst incidents of racial violence in U.S. history, and, for a period, remained one of the least-known: News reports were largely squelched, despite the fact that hundreds of people were killed and thousands left homeless.
One possible reason why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks is that they wanted to erase the evidence of their crimes and avoid accountability for their actions. For decades, there was no public recognition or official investigation of the massacre. The local newspapers that had covered the story were removed from archives or destroyed. The survivors and their descendants were silenced by fear, intimidation, and legal threats. The state and city governments did not acknowledge or compensate the victims for their losses. The history of Greenwood and its prosperous Black community was largely forgotten or distorted.Another possible reason why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks is that they wanted to maintain their racial supremacy and economic dominance over the Black population. One factor that drove the violence was resentment toward the Black prosperity found in block after block of Greenwood, which was home to what was known as America’s Black Wall Street. The white mob looted and burned down hundreds of businesses, including grocery stores, hotels, nightclubs, theaters, doctor’s offices, and churches. They also killed hundreds of residents and drove thousands out of their homes. By destroying Greenwood, they eliminated a source of competition and inspiration for Black people across the nation. They also prevented the accumulation and transmission of generational wealth that could have shaped and secured the fortunes of Black children and grandchildren.
Therefore, some possible reasons why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks are that they wanted to cover up their atrocities, escape justice, and preserve their racial and economic privilege.
Despite the end of the cold war, many people still worry about new threats to world peace and security. What are these threats? how has the international community dealt with them?.
Can someone type an essay about berlin,korea,and cuba: how did U.S contain communism?
Where did German communists take their orders from?
Answer:
German communists took their orders from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). The CPSU was the ruling party of the Soviet Union and it had a great deal of influence over communist parties around the world. The CPSU provided financial and logistical support to communist parties in other countries, and it also issued directives on how they should operate. German communists were expected to follow the CPSU's lead, and they were often punished if they did not.
The CPSU's influence over German communists was particularly strong during the Cold War. The Soviet Union was seen as the leader of the communist world, and German communists were expected to toe the party line. The CPSU's influence began to decline after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and it has been virtually nonexistent since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Which state does not have a river that is connected to the mississippi river?
if anyone answers correct, i will vote branliest!!
a) arkansas
b) illinois
c) kentucky
d) missouri
Illinois does not have a river that is connected to the mississippi river
Which state does not have a river that is connected to the mississippi river?Illinois is the state that does not have a river directly connected to the Mississippi River.
Illinois is situated along the eastern bank of the Mississippi River, and it is home to the city of Cairo, where the Ohio River converges with the Mississippi. While Illinois has several significant rivers, such as the Illinois River and the Wabash River, they are not directly connected to the Mississippi River.
Read more on Mississippi River https://brainly.com/question/7999616
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP
(who ever answers all gets brainliest)
1-Describe two facts about Abraham Lincoln’s background that likely influenced or biased his point of view.
2-Describe two facts about Jefferson Davis’s background that likely influenced or biased his point of view.
3-Supporters of the Union looked to Article VI of the Constitution for support for their argument. Read the excerpt from Article VI and then choose and defend a point of view regarding whether the Constitution corroborates (supports) a view that the Union is permanent.
"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. "
Two facts about Jefferson Davis's background that likely influenced or biased his point of view are his upbringing in the South and his military experience. Born in Kentucky and raised in Mississippi, Davis was exposed to Southern culture and values, which included support for states' rights and the institution of slavery.
This regional upbringing likely shaped his perspective on the supremacy of the Constitution and federal laws.
Additionally, his military experience, both at West Point and during the Mexican-American War, might have reinforced his belief in strong central authority while also emphasizing the importance of individual states' rights in the context of the overall nation.
These two aspects of his background contributed to the development of his views on the relationship between the federal government and individual states.
To know more about slavery, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/9331183#
#SPJ11
Answer: Abraham Lincoln was against slavery and wanted to do whatever he could to end it. A reason for this is because he believed that slavery was morally wrong and that Black people should have the same rights as white people with him saying "All me are created equal," said Lincoln. These thoughts of his would eventually get him killed after the Emancipation Proclamation was put into law he was killed almost three months later.
Explanation: gotchu
What was true about the British approach to colonialism?
Option C. Britain wanted colonists to know how to govern themselves is the most accurate statement about the British approach to colonialism.
What informs the Britain's approach?The British approach to colonialism was characterized by the belief that the colonists would eventually be able to govern themselves under the guidance and supervision of the British.
The British encouraged the use of the local language in favor of English and they did not encourage settlers to speak their mother tongue.
Therefore, option C. Britain wanted colonists to know how to govern themselves is the most accurate statement about the British approach to colonialism.
learn more about colonialism: https://brainly.com/question/8048490
#SPJ1
Who is the mongol conqueror of much of asia and parts of europe. he lived from 1162 until 1227?
Answer: Genghis Khan
Explanation:
The Mongol conqueror of much of Asia and parts of Europe who lived from 1162 until 1227 is Genghis Khan. He is considered one of the most successful military commanders in history and is credited with founding the Mongol Empire, which at its peak stretched from Asia to Europe.
The Mongol conqueror of much of Asia and parts of Europe who lived from 1162 until 1227 is Genghis Khan.
Genghis Khan was the founder and first emperor of the Mongol Empire, which at its height, stretched from Eastern Europe to the Sea of Japan. He was born as Temujin in the harsh steppes of Mongolia and grew up as a warrior. He united many Mongol tribes and conquered much of Central Asia, including China, before his death in 1227.
Genghis Khan was known for his military tactics, which were based on speed, mobility, and surprise, as well as his cruelty towards his enemies. He also implemented administrative and legal reforms that helped to govern the vast territories of his empire. His legacy as a conqueror and leader is still felt today in the cultures and societies of many of the regions he conquered.
Learn more about Genghis Khan: https://brainly.com/question/22796812
#SPJ11
What was the ultimate fate of Osama bin Laden following his terrorist organization's attacks on America?
The reason behind Osama's assault on America was his conviction that a staggering strike on American soil would persuade the U.S. to pull out from the Muslim world. Osama went against the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia and Somalia and looked to drive our country's staff out of these areas forcibly.
The unlawful utilization of power or brutality against individuals or property with the thing of scaring or pressuring an administration, the overall people, or any subset thereof, to advance political or social objectives.
Terrorism's main objective is to sabotage individuals' sense that everything is good in the areas they are generally acquainted with. Critical targets can likewise have structures or different spots that act as huge political or financial images, like government offices or military stations.
Learn more about Terrorism:
https://brainly.com/question/885090
#SPJ4
after the war, propaganda such as that employed by the image was used to help justify which of the following policies? responses the pursuit of more open international trade the pursuit of more open international trade the expansion of compulsory education the expansion of compulsory education literacy requirements for voting rights literacy requirements for voting rights red scare prosecutions
Propaganda is a form of communication that aims to shape people's beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. It is often used by governments, political groups, and other organizations to promote particular ideas, policies, or ideologies.
Propaganda can be used to justify a wide range of policies and actions, depending on the goals and values of the group using it. For example, propaganda might be used to:
Promote military recruitment and support for war
Demonize political opponents and minority groups
Encourage compliance with government policies and regulations
Promote economic growth and development
Shape public opinion on social and cultural issues
Ultimately, the impact of propaganda depends on a variety of factors, including the medium used, the target audience, and the cultural and political context in which it is received.
To know more about propaganda here
https://brainly.com/question/25836020
#SPJ4
One reason President Johnson created the Great Society program was to give the United States an advantage in the space race. Strengthen Secret Service protections for the president. Overturn several policies of the previous administration. Carry on the social reform goals of his predecessor. Both the Congress of Racial Equality and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee coordinated protest marches in the North. Organized freedom rides in the South. Organized freedom rides in the North. Organized boycotts in the North and South
President Johnson created the Great Society program for multiple reasons, including carrying on the social reform goals of his predecessor, overturning several policies of the previous administration, and strengthening Secret Service protections for the president.
However, giving the United States an advantage in the space race was not a primary reason for the program's creation.
Additionally, both the Congress of Racial Equality and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee coordinated protest marches in the North and organized freedom rides in the South, but there is no evidence of them organizing freedom rides in the North or organizing boycotts in both the North and South.
Overall, the Great Society program was a comprehensive plan aimed at addressing various societal issues, including poverty, education, and civil rights.
To know more about Great Society , refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/31592359#
#SPJ11
What made the battle at Antietam and Gettysburg different from the other battles
Despite just lasting three days, the Battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest in American history. On the other hand, the Battle of Antietam was the bloodiest day in American history, with 22,717 persons being reported as either dead, missing, or injured.
What made the Battle of Gettysburg unique compared to other battles?Union and Confederate forces clashed in and around the Pennsylvanian town of Gettysburg on July 1-3, 1863, during the American Civil War. The fighting, which is frequently considered to have been the war's turning point, claimed the most lives overall.
What made the Battle of Antietam unique compared to prior battles?The Union army in the Eastern theater was capable of holding itself back from the Confederate army thanks to Antietam, the bloodiest day of combat in American military history. Also, it provided Lincoln the self-assurance he required so that he could deliver the first Emancipation Proclamation when he was in control rather than when he was in a desperate position.
Learn more about Emancipation Proclamation: https://brainly.com/question/29788953
#SPJ1
Answer the shown questions.
The U-2 spy plane discovered that the Soviet Union was installing intermediate-range ballistic m i s s i l e s in Cuba.
What are the responses to other questions?2) This discovery knew the alarm language for the United States, because the rocket could reach Washington D. S u. This is due to the fact that there is a nuclear attack in five minutes from the United States.
3) J F K made a Navy blockage to prevent the parliamentary mi s s i l es in Cuba for the situation in Cuba. He also demanded that the Soviets remove the m i s s i l es from Cuba and destroy the missile bases.
4) J F K feared that boarding the ship could be interpreted by the Soviets as an act of war and responded with violence, leading to full-scale nuclear war.
5) Khrushchev was willing to remove the missiles from Cuba in exchange for an open promise that the United States would not invade Cuba and a tacit agreement to withdraw obsolete missiles from Turkey.
6) After the Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved, Cold War tensions eased as the United States and the Soviet Union recognized the danger of nuclear war. They have taken steps to improve communications and reduce the risk of accidental nuclear war, including signing the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and establishing direct communications between the White House and the Kremlin.
learn more about U-2 spy plane: https://brainly.com/question/1340291
#SPJ1
How did the colonists respond to the intolerable acts of 1774?
The colonists responded to the Intolerable Acts of 1774 by organizing the First Continental Congress, boycotting British goods, and forming local militias.
To elaborate, the Intolerable Acts, also known as the Coercive Acts, were a series of punitive measures imposed by the British government in response to the Boston Tea Party. The colonists saw these acts as a violation of their rights and liberties.
As a result, they held the First Continental Congress in September 1774, where representatives from 12 of the 13 colonies convened to discuss a unified response. They agreed to boycott British goods, which effectively pressured the British economy.
Additionally, they drafted a petition to King George III, outlining their grievances and demanding the repeal of the Intolerable Acts. Lastly, colonists formed local militias to defend themselves in case of any British aggression.
This collective response paved the way for the American Revolutionary War and ultimately, the colonies' independence from Britain.
To know more about American Revolutionary War click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1466912#
#SPJ11
how does castiglione define the renaissance man in the courtier
Answer:well-rounded, skilled in the art of war, and be a superior athlete.
Explanation:
Which of the following resulted from the publication of uncle's Tom's cabin
Option 2 is entirely accurate, that is More people joined the abolitionist cause after reading the book.
What's in the uncle Tom book, exactly?The novel "helped lay the groundwork for the [American] Civil War" and had a significant impact on American perceptions of African Americans and slavery.
The main character of the novel is Uncle Tom, a long-suffering black slave around whose tales the other characters are centred. In the 1850s, it is acknowledged to have played a role in igniting the abolitionist movement. Because of the book's widespread influence, an apocryphal tale of Abraham Lincoln and Harriet Beecher Stowe meeting at the outbreak of the Civil War surfaced.
To know about uncle Tom's book visit:
https://brainly.com/question/846029
#SPJ1
Which of these resulted from the 1851 publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin?
Angry Sputherners burned all copies of the book.
The book convinced more people to join the abolitionist cause.
Members of an violent proslavery group killed author Harriet Beecher Stowe.
Southern slaveholders were shamed into freeing their slaves.
Public domain
Use the graph and your knowledge of U.S. history to answer the question. Which of these explains the differences in Union vs. Confederate firearm production during the Civil War? (5 points)
To know more about Civil War, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
Answer:
The North's heavy industrialization provided an advantage.
Explanation:
Which best explains why the abolitionist movement grew stronger as a result of the Scott v. Sandford ruling?
a. Only Scott should be free.
b. The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.
c. The children of the Scotts would be free.
d. Only Scott’s wife should be free
The abolitionist movement grew stronger as a result of the Scott v. Sandford ruling was explained by b. The Scotts should be freed, but the decision was later overturned.
African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be considered American citizens and, as a result, could not file a claim for their freedom in federal courts, according to the U.S. Supreme Court's famous Scott v. Sandford decision, popularly known as the Dred Scott case, which was made in 1857. The abolitionist movement, which had been fighting to abolish slavery in the United States, was dealt a devastating setback by this ruling.
It demonstrated how the Supreme Court disregarded African Americans' fundamental human rights and upheld the system of slavery. Although the decision sparked outrage among abolitionists and received widespread criticism, it did not advance their cause. Instead, it strengthened pro-slavery defenders and made it more challenging for abolitionists to succeed.
Read more about Scott v. Sandford on:
https://brainly.com/question/13656974
#SPJ4
by christmas 1914, what three areas had armies moved into?
Which event is best supported by the belief expressed in John O'Sullivan's quote?
a. Xyz affair
b. War of 1812
c. Texas annexation
d. Election of andrew jackson
John O'Sullivan's quote "The great American experiment of liberty and democratic government demands expansion" best supports the event of Texas annexation.
The correct option is C.
This quote expresses the belief that the United States should expand its boundaries, and this belief was used to justify the annexation of Texas in 1845. The Texas annexation was an important event in US history, as it precipitated the Mexican-American War, greatly expanded the size of the United States, and helped to spread the ideals of democracy and liberty.
The War of 1812 and the election of Andrew Jackson do not have any direct connection to expansion, so they are not supported by the belief expressed in the quote.
The correct option is C.
To know more about John O'Sullivan, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1778097
#SPJ4
Which idea was embraced by fascists in europe during the 1920s an
The idea that was embraced by fascists in Europe during the 1920s was the concept of totalitarianism, nationalism, and the belief in a strong central government led by a single authoritarian leader.
The idea of nationalism and the importance of a strong, centralized state were the key tenets embraced by fascists in Europe during the 1920s. This ideology was used to justify their aggressive and expansionist foreign policies, as well as their oppressive tactics at home.
Totalitarianism refers to a political system in which the government exercises complete control over all aspects of society, including the economy, culture, and individual rights. Fascists believed that this level of control was necessary to create a unified and strong nation.
Nationalism, another key component of fascism, is a political ideology that emphasizes the importance of shared cultural and historical identity, and the belief that one's nation is superior to others. Fascists believed that the success of their nation required the suppression of minority groups and the promotion of the majority's interests.
Lastly, fascists in Europe during the 1920s believed in the necessity of a strong central government led by a single authoritarian leader, often referred to as a dictator. This leader was expected to make swift and decisive decisions for the betterment of the nation, bypassing traditional democratic processes.
In summary, the idea embraced by fascists in Europe during the 1920s was a combination of totalitarianism, nationalism, and the belief in a strong central government led by a single authoritarian leader. These principles allowed fascists to justify their aggressive actions, control their societies, and promote their nationalistic agenda.
To know more about fascists refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/461379#
#SPJ11
"Tournament Winner" by Luke See. In which way does the reader learn the most about the character Charles Bradford?
In "Tournament Winner" by Luke See, the reader learns the most about Charles Bradford through his thoughts and actions during the chess tournament.
In the story, Charles Bradford's thoughts and actions reveal his character traits, such as determination, intelligence, and strategy. As he progresses through the chess tournament, we see him analyzing his opponents, making strategic moves, and reflecting on his past experiences.
These insights provide a deep understanding of his personality and motivations. Furthermore, his interactions with other characters also help in developing his character, as they shed light on his relationships and how he is perceived by others.
By observing Charles Bradford's thoughts and actions, the reader gains a comprehensive understanding of his character, ultimately contributing to the story's depth and overall message.
To know more about character traits click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/15229018#
#SPJ11
