Find the variance of the set of data: 1010,1005,1020,1025, and 1030

a) The frequency distribution table regarding their serum HDL cholesterol data is present in above figure 1.

b) The relative frequency distribution table regarding their serum HDL cholesterol data is present in above figure 2.

We have a patient data of a doctor who randomly select his 40 patients. The following data is regarding their serum HDL cholesterol.

34, 51, 48, 37, 41, 63, 65, 42, 53, 58, 46, 41, 66, 36, 44, 53, 52, 63, 51, 63, 42, 54, 36, 46, 41, 63, 54, 52, 43, 36, 38, 56, 46, 56, 49, 73, 45, 46,64, 45

a) A frequency distribution can show the exact number of observations or the percentage of observations falling into each interval. Here are the steps to draw a frequency distribution table:

The frequency distribution table for HDL cholesterol data of paitents is present in above figure 1.

b) A relative frequency distribution is one of type of frequency distribution. To calculate the relative frequency, divide the frequency by the total count of data values. Steps are the following:

The relative frequency distribution table is present in above figure 2.

For more information about relative frequency distribution, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29012139

#SPJ4

Complete question :

A doctor randomly selects 40 of his patients and obtains the following data regarding their serum HDL cholesterol.

34, 51, 48, 37, 41, 63, 65, 42, 53, 58, 46, 41, 66, 36, 44, 53, 52, 63, 51, 63, 42, 54, 36, 46, 41, 63, 54, 52, 43, 36, 38, 56, 46, 56, 49, 73, 45, 46,64, 45

a) construct frequency distribution

b) construct relative frequency distribution table

In correlational designs for exploring and quantifying relationships between continuous variables in a single population.

The most commonly used parametric test in a correlational design is the Pearson correlation coefficient, also known as Pearson's r or simply r. It is used to measure the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two continuous variables.

The Pearson correlation coefficient, r, ranges from -1 to 1. A value of 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship, a value of -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, and a value of 0 indicates no linear relationship between the variables.

To use Pearson's r, the data must meet certain assumptions, including that the variables are normally distributed, there is a linear relationship between the variables, and there are no outliers or influential data points.

Once the data meets the assumptions, the Pearson correlation coefficient can be calculated using a statistical software or by hand. The resulting r value can then be interpreted and used to make conclusions about the relationship between the variables.

Overall, the Pearson correlation coefficient is a useful and commonly used tool in correlational designs for exploring and quantifying relationships between continuous variables in a single population.

To learn more about assumptions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14511295

#SPJ11

David, Jeff, and Paula have (7d)/3 books.

To find out how many books David, Jeff, and Paula have altogether in terms of d, we can use the given information as follows:

1. David has d books.
2. David has 3 times as many books as Jeff, so Jeff has d/3 books.
3. David has the same number of books as Paula, so Paula also has d books.

Now, to find the total number of books for all three of them, we simply add the number of books each person has:

Total books = David's books + Jeff's books + Paula's books
Total books = d + d/3 + d

To combine these terms, we can find a common denominator (in this case, 3):
Total books = (3d + d + 3d) / 3

Now, we can simplify the expression:
Total books = (7d) / 3

So, altogether, David, Jeff, and Paula have (7d)/3 books in terms of d.

Learn more about denominator:

https://brainly.com/question/19249494

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. Billions

Step-by-step explanation:

Five is 7 spots over from the decimal spot. This means there are six zeros before five. 5,000,000.

This is the billions place value.

The total compound amount is $1042.35

The amount of interest earned is $42.35.

A = P (1 + r/n)(nt) is the formula for calculating compound interest.

Where

The compound amount can be calculated using the values provided as follows:

n = 2 (Semiannually)

r = 0.0137 (1.37% in decimal form)

t=3 years

P = $1000

A = 1000 (1 + 0.0137/2)^(2*3)

A = 1000 (1.00685)^6

A = 1000 (1.04235)

A = $1042.35

Therefore, The total compound amount is $1042.35

We must deduct the initial principal from the compound sum to determine the interest earned:

Interest = A - P

Interest = $1042.35 - $1000

Interest = $42.35

Therefore, the amount of interest earned is $42.35.

Learn more about compound interest : brainly.com/question/24924853

#SPJ1

Answer: A option

Step-by-step explanation:

sin x = p/h

=15/25 = 0.6

a. (i) The predicted final exam score for a student who has a midterm score of 55 is 61.75.

(ii) The predicted final exam score for a student who has a midterm score of 88 is 79.9.

b. The correlation coefficient is positive and relatively strong (0.55), indicating that higher midterm exam scores tend to correspond to higher final exam score.

a.(i) The predicted final exam score for a student who has midterm score = 55 is:

y = 31.5 + 0.55x

y = 31.5 + 0.55(55)

y = 31.5 + 30.25

y = 61.75

Therefore, the predicted final exam score for a student who has a midterm score of 55 is 61.75.

(ii) The predicted final exam score for a student who has a midterm score of 88 is:

y = 31.5 + 0.55x

y = 31.5 + 0.55(88)

y = 31.5 + 48.4

y = 79.9

Therefore, the predicted final exam score for a student who has a midterm score of 88 is 79.9.

b. The correlation between the midterm exam scores and the final exam scores can be calculated using the formula:

r = b * (SDy / SDx)

where b is the slope of the regression line, SDy is the standard deviation of the final exam scores, and SDx is the standard deviation of the midterm exam scores.

In this case, b = 0.55, SDy = 15, and SDx = 15, since both midterm and final exam scores have the same mean and standard deviation. Therefore, the correlation is:

r = 0.55 * (15 / 15) = 0.55

The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1, where values closer to +1 indicate a stronger positive correlation, values closer to -1 indicate a stronger negative correlation, and values close to 0 indicate no correlation.

In this case, the correlation coefficient is positive and relatively strong (0.55), indicating that higher midterm exam scores tend to correspond to higher final exam scores.

For similar question on coefficient.

https://brainly.com/question/13019734

#SPJ11

i) The intersection point is (36, 12).

ii) The volume of the solid is 45696π/5 cubic units.

i) To find the intersection points of the closed region, we need to solve the equations of the two curves that intersect. In this case, it is the curve y = 4 →x and the line x = 36.

y = 4 →x:

[tex]x = y^2/4[/tex]

Substituting x = 36, we get:

[tex]36 = y^2/4\\y^2 = 144[/tex]

y = ±12

Since we are interested in the part of the curve that lies within the region, we take y = 12.

ii) To find the volume of the solid using the method of cylindrical shells rotating about y = 26, we first need to find the height and radius of the cylindrical shells at each height y.

The height of the cylindrical shell at height y is simply the difference between the two curves at that height:

h(y) = 12 - 4 →x

[tex]= 12 - y^2/4[/tex]

The radius of the cylindrical shell at height y is the distance between the y-axis and the curve y = 4 →x:

r(y) = x

[tex]= y^2/4[/tex]

Now we can use the formula for the volume of a cylindrical shell:

[tex]V = 2\pi \int [26,12] r(y)h(y)dy\\= 2\pi \int [26,12] (y^2/4)(12 - y^2/4)dy\\= 2\pi \int [26,12] (3y^2 - y^4/16)dy\\= 2\pi [(y^3/3) - (y^5/80)]|[26,12]\\= 2\pi [(12^3/3) - (12^5/80) - (26^3/3) + (26^5/80)][/tex]

= 45696π/5

for such more question on intersection point

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

Investing $10,000 at 4% interest for 10 years will yield $14,802.47 with continuous compounding, and $14,563.92 with monthly compounding. The difference is approximately $238.55.

To calculate the difference in the final amounts under continuous compounding versus monthly compounding, we can use the formula for compound interest

For continuous compounding[tex]A = Pe^{rt}[/tex]

For monthly compounding [tex]A = P(1 + r/12)^{12t}[/tex]

where

A is the amount after t years

P is the principal amount invested (in this case, $10,000)

r is the annual interest rate (in this case, 4% or 0.04)

t is the number of years

Using these formulas, we can calculate the amount after 10 years under continuous compounding

[tex]A_{continuous = 10000e^{0.0410} = $14,802.47[/tex]

And under monthly compounding

[tex]A_{monthly = 10000(1 + 0.04/12)^{12*10} = $14,563.92[/tex]

The difference in the final amounts is

[tex]A_{continuous} - A_{monthly} = 238.55[/tex]

Therefore, if the interest is compounded continuously, the investment will earn approximately $238.55 more than if it is compounded monthly over a period of 10 years.

To know more about compound interest:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ4

If the magician correctly guesses both of your birthdays on the first try, it would be very unlikely to have occurred by pure chance. The probability of correctly guessing the birthday of one person on the first try is already very low at 0.0027. The probability of correctly guessing the birthday of two people in a row is even lower at 0.0000075.

Therefore, it is more likely that the magician had some other means of knowing your birthdays, rather than simply guessing them by chance. This could be through previous knowledge or research, such as being a stalker, or it could be through some sort of trick or illusion, such as using a hidden device or subtle cues to deduce the birthdays. In any case, it is highly unlikely that the magician would have been able to correctly guess both of your birthdays on the first try purely by chance.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The variance of the new data set (which includes the observation 14) is approximately 1.6667.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for the variance of a sample:

[tex]s^2 = \sum (x - \bar x)^2 / (n - 1)[/tex]

where [tex]s^2[/tex] is the sample variance,

[tex]\sum[/tex] is the sum,

x is the data point,

[tex]\bar x[/tex] is the sample mean, and

n is the sample size.

We know that the sample mean ([tex]\bar x[/tex]) is 10 and the sample size (n) is 25.

We also know that the sample variance ([tex]s^2[/tex]) is 1.

Using this information, we can solve for the sum of squares of the

original data points:

[tex]s^2 = \sum (x - \bar x)^2 / (n - 1)[/tex]

[tex]1 = \sum (x - 10)^2 / (25 - 1)[/tex]

[tex]24 = \sum (x - 10)^2[/tex]

Now we can add the new observation of 14 to the data set and calculate the new sample variance:

[tex]s^2 = \sum (x - \bar x)^2 / (n - 1)[/tex]

[tex]s^2 = \sum [(x - 10)^2 + (14 - 10)^2] / (25 - 1)[/tex]

[tex]s^2 = [\sum (x - 10)^2 + (14 - 10)^2] / (25 - 1)[/tex]

[tex]s^2 = [24 + 16] / 24[/tex]

[tex]s^2 = 1.6667[/tex]

Therefore, the variance of the new data set (which includes the observation 14) is approximately 1.6667.

for such more question on variance

https://brainly.com/question/30884734

#SPJ11

x⁶The minimum value of f(x) is 10.6066, under the condition we have to apply first derivative test.
To find the minimum value of f(x)=(15x⁴+15)/x² using the First Derivative Test, we need to follow these steps:

In order to find the first derivative of f(x) using the quotient rule
f'(x) = (15x²(x²-2))/x⁴
Now, we have to Simplify f'(x) by factoring out 15x²
f'(x) = 15x²(x²-2)/x⁴
Therefore we have to find the critical points by setting f'(x) equal to zero and evaluating for x
f'(x) = 0
15x²(x²-2)/x⁴ = 0
15(x²-2) = 0
x = +/- √(2)

Now we have to determine whether each critical point is a minimum or maximum by using the First Derivative Test
f''(x) = (30x(x²-3))/x⁶
When x = √(2), f''(√(2)) > 0, so f(√(2)) is  minimum.
When x = -√(2), f''(-√(2)) < 0, so f(-√(2)) is maximum.
Hence, the minimum value of f(x)=(15x⁴+15)/x² is
f(√2) = 10.6066


To learn more about quotient rule
https://brainly.com/question/30278964
#SPJ4

The radius of the sphere is approximately 2.18 cm.

The volume of the cone is given by:

[tex]V_{cone[/tex] = (1/3) x π x [tex]r^2[/tex] x h

where r is the radius of the base and h is the height.

Substituting the given values, we get:

[tex]V_{cone[/tex] = (1/3) x π x [tex](2.1)^2[/tex] x 8.4

[tex]V_{cone[/tex] = 37.478 [tex]cm^3[/tex]

Since the cone is melted and recast into a sphere, the volume of the sphere will be equal to the volume of the cone.

Therefore:

[tex]V_{sphere[/tex] = [tex]V_{cone[/tex] = 37.478 [tex]cm^3[/tex]

The volume of a sphere is given by:

[tex]V_{sphere[/tex]  = (4/3) x π x [tex]r^3[/tex]

Substituting the value of [tex]V_{sphere[/tex], we get:

(4/3) x π x [tex]r^3[/tex] = 37.478

Solving for r, we get:

[tex]r^3[/tex] = (3/4) x 37.478/π

[tex]r^3[/tex] = 9.3695

r = 2.18 cm (approx)

For similar question on radius:

https://brainly.com/question/1663922

#SPJ11

f(x) = Σ [(-1)^n * 2^(2n) * (x-4)^(2n)]/(2n)! for n=0,1,2,...

To find the Taylor series for f centered at x=4, we will use the given information about the function's derivatives at that point.

For f(2n)(4), we have:
f(2n)(4) = (-1)^n * 2^(2n)

For f(2n+1)(4), we have:
f(2n+1)(4) = 0 for all n

The Taylor series for a function f centered at x=c is given by:
f(x) = Σ [f^(n)(c) * (x-c)^n]/n! for n=0,1,2,...

In our case, c=4. Since all odd derivatives are 0, the series will only have even terms. So the Taylor series for f centered at x=4 will be:

f(x) = Σ [f(2n)(4) * (x-4)^(2n)]/(2n)! for n=0,1,2,...

Substituting the expression for f(2n)(4):

f(x) = Σ [(-1)^n * 2^(2n) * (x-4)^(2n)]/(2n)! for n=0,1,2,...

This is the Taylor series representation for f centered at x=4.

To learn more about taylor series, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/29733106

#SPJ11

We can calculate probability when coin is flipped by [tex]C(n, k) / 2^n[/tex]

To calculate the probability of getting an equal number of heads and tails when a fair coin is flipped n times, we'll use the binomial coefficient formula. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Ensure that n is an even number, as an equal number of heads and tails is only possible with an even number of flips.

2. Divide n by 2 to find the number of heads (or tails) required for an equal outcome. Let's call this k.

3. Calculate the binomial coefficient, which is the number of ways to choose k heads (or tails) from n flips. This is represented as C(n, k) or "n choose k" and can be calculated using the formula:

  C(n, k) = [tex]n! / (k!(n-k)!)[/tex]

  where n! is the factorial of n (n*(n-1)*...*1), and similarly for k! and (n-k)!.

4. Calculate the total possible outcomes for n coin flips. Since there are 2 possible outcomes (heads or tails) for each flip, there are [tex]2^n[/tex]total outcomes.

5. Calculate the probability of getting an equal number of heads and tails by dividing the number of favorable outcomes (C(n, k)) by the total possible outcomes (2^n):

  Probability =[tex]C(n, k) / 2^n[/tex]

By following these steps with your given value of n, you can find the probability of getting an equal number of heads and tails when flipping a fair coin n times.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/29564333

#SPJ11

3/6 × 3/6 = 1/4

answer is 1/4

chance of dice getting even nunber is 3

( 2, 4, 6 ) out of total 6 numbers on dice.

Hoever there r two dices so you multiply the probability by itself , giving you ¼

We can be 95% confident that the true proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin during the 2014-2015 influenza season is between 0.46 and 0.58.

What is algebra?

Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with mathematical operations and symbols used to represent numbers and quantities in equations and formulas.

To calculate a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin, you should use a confidence interval for a single proportion. The requirements for using this procedure are:

Random sampling: The participants in the study should be randomly selected from the population of interest. In this case, the participants were randomly selected from 2321 individuals with respiratory illness.

Independence: The participants in the study should be independent of each other. In other words, the response of one participant should not affect the response of another participant. In this case, it is assumed that the participants are independent of each other.

Sample size: The sample size should be sufficiently large. A commonly used rule of thumb is that both the number of successes and failures in the sample should be at least 10. In this case, the number of vaccinated patients is 203, and the number of unvaccinated patients is 187. Both of these numbers are greater than 10.

Under these assumptions, you can use a normal approximation to calculate the confidence interval for the proportion of vaccinated patients. The formula for the confidence interval is:

p ± zsqrt(p(1-p)/n)

where p is the sample proportion of vaccinated patients, z is the critical value from the standard normal distribution for a 95% confidence interval (which is approximately 1.96), and n is the sample size.

Plugging in the numbers from the study, we get:

p = 203/390 = 0.52

n = 390

So the confidence interval for the proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin is:

0.52 ± 1.96sqrt(0.52(1-0.52)/390)

= 0.46 to 0.58

Therefore, we can be 95% confident that the true proportion of vaccinated patients in Wisconsin during the 2014-2015 influenza season is between 0.46 and 0.58.

To learn more about algebra from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/24875240

#SPJ1

a. Null hypothesis: The germination rate is 90% or higher and Alternative hypothesis: The germination rate is less than 90%, b. The critical value for a one-tailed test at the 5% significance level with 99 degrees of freedom is -1.660, c. The relevant test statistic is z = (83/100 - 0.90) / sqrt(0.90*0.10/100) = -1.73. Since -1.73 < -1.660, the test statistic falls in the region of rejection, d. The p-value is P(z < -1.73) = 0.042. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis, e. We reject the claim that the germination rate is 90% or higher.

For the first question:
a. Null hypothesis: The germination rate is 90% or higher.
  Alternative hypothesis: The germination rate is less than 90%.

b. The critical value for a one-tailed test at the 5% significance level with 99 degrees of freedom is -1.660.

c. The relevant test statistic is z = (83/100 - 0.90) / sqrt(0.90*0.10/100) = -1.73. Since -1.73 < -1.660, the test statistic falls in the region of rejection.

d. The p-value is P(z < -1.73) = 0.042. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

e. We reject the claim that the germination rate is 90% or higher.

For the second question:
a. Null hypothesis: The average life of the electric light bulbs is 2000 hours or less.
  Alternative hypothesis: The average life of the electric light bulbs is greater than 2000 hours.

b. The critical value for a one-tailed test at the 2% significance level with 63 degrees of freedom is 2.353.

c. The relevant test statistic is t = (2008 - 2000) / (12.31 / sqrt(64)) = 5.82. Since 5.82 > 2.353, the test statistic falls in the region of rejection.

d. The p-value is P(t > 5.82) < 0.001. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.02, we reject the null hypothesis.

e. We have sufficient evidence to support the manufacturer's claim that the average life of his electric light bulbs is greater than 2000 hours.

To learn more about Null hypothesis, click here:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Answer:

C) (5 x 2) x 8

Step-by-step explanation:

associative property of multiplication

The probability that x will be less than 34 in a sample of size 58 drawn from a population with a mean of 33 and a standard deviation of 5 is approximately 0.9357.

To find the probability that x will be less than 34 in a sample of size 58 drawn from a population with a mean of 33 and a standard deviation of 5, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula:

SE = standard deviation / √sample size
  SE = 5 / √58 ≈ 0.656

2. Convert the sample mean (x) to a z-score using the formula:

z = (x - population mean) / SE
  z = (34 - 33) / 0.656 ≈ 1.52

3. Use a z-table or calculator to find the probability corresponding to the z-score.

For a z-score of 1.52, the probability is 0.9357.

Learn more about probability:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The equation of the tangent line to y = 4eˣ at the point x₀ = 0 is y = 4x + 4.

To find the equation of the tangent line at a specific point, we need to follow a few steps:

In this case, the function is y = 4eˣ. To find the derivative, we can use the power rule of differentiation, which states that the derivative of eˣ is eˣ. Therefore, the derivative of y = 4eˣ is y' = 4eˣ.

We are looking for the equation of the tangent line at x₀ = 0, so we need to evaluate the derivative at x = 0. Plugging x = 0 into y' = 4eˣ gives us y'(0) = 4e⁰ = 4.

The point-slope form of a linear equation is y - y₁ = m(x - x₁), where m is the slope of the line and (x₁, y₁) is a point on the line. In this case, we know that the point on the line is (0, y(0)), where y(0) is the value of the function at x = 0. Plugging in x₁ = 0 and y₁ = y(0) = 4e⁰ = 4, and m = y'(0) = 4, we get:

y - 4 = 4(x - 0)

Simplifying this equation gives us the equation of the tangent line:

y = 4x + 4

To know more about tangent line here

https://brainly.com/question/31326507

#SPJ4

Answer: x=-3.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Just warning that I am not sure about this answer, but this is how I view it:

2(RW)=TU

2(-5x+45)=-4x+41

-10x+90=-4x+41

90=-14x+41

49=-14x

x=-3.5

Let me know if this is right!

The general solution for y in terms of t is y(t) =[tex]c1e^{(-2t)}cos(3t) + c2e^{(-2t})sin(3t) + (1/10)e^{(2t)}cos(t) - (1/26)e^{(2t)}sin(t)[/tex] where c1 and c2 are constants determined by the initial conditions of the problem.

To find the general solution for y in terms of t, we first need to solve the homogeneous equation d²y/dt² + 4 dy/dt + 13y = 0.

The characteristic equation is r² + 4r + 13 = 0, which has roots -2 + 3i and -2 - 3i.

Therefore, the homogeneous solution is yh(t) = c1e^(-2t)cos(3t) + c2e^(-2t)sin(3t).

To find the particular solution yp(t), we can use the method of undetermined coefficients.

Since the right-hand side of the equation is e^2t cos(t), we assume yp(t) = Ae^(2t)cos(t) + Be^(2t)sin(t).

Taking the first and second derivatives of yp(t), we get:

[tex]dy/dt = 2Ae^{(2t)}cos(t) - Ae^{(2t)}sin(t) + 2Be^{(2t)}sin(t) + Be^{(2t)}cos(t)[/tex]
[tex]d^2y/dt^2 = 4Ae^{(2t)}cos(t) - 4Ae^{(2t)}sin(t) + 8Be^{(2t)}cos(t) - 8Be^{(2t)}sin(t)[/tex]

Substituting these expressions back into the original equation and equating coefficients of like terms, we get:

(4A + 2B) + (13A + 13B)cos(t) + 13Acos(t) - 13Bsin(t) = e^(2t)cos(t)

Solving for A and B, we get A = 1/10 and B = -1/26.

Therefore, the particular solution is yp(t) = (1/10)e^(2t)cos(t) - (1/26)e^(2t)sin(t).

The general solution for y is the sum of the homogeneous and particular solutions:

y(t) = yh(t) + yp(t)
Learn more about second-order linear differential equations : https://brainly.com/question/13426875

#SPJ11

The surface area of the cylinder is approximately [tex]75.36 mm^{2}[/tex].

The surface area means the total space covered by flat surfaces of the bases of the cylinder and its curved surface.

The surface area is found by using "A = 2πr² + 2πrh: where A is the surface area, r is the radius and h is the height.

r = 2mm

h = 4mm

Substituting the values, we get:

A = 2π(2²) + 2π(2)(4)

A = 8π + 16π

A = 8*3.14 + 16*3.14

A = 75.36

Full question "What is the surface area of this cylinder? The radius is 2 mm and height is 4mm. Use ​ ≈ 3.14 and round your answer to the nearest hundredth".

Read more about surface area

brainly.com/question/76387

#SPJ1

a) To determine the proportion of people in the survey who looked up prices using their mobile phones in the past 30 days, we need to add up the number of people who answered "Yes" and divide it by the total number of respondents. From the given table, we can see that 46% of people answered "Yes". Therefore, the proportion of people who looked up prices using their mobile phones in the past 30 days is 0.46 or 46%.

b) To create a clustered bar chart involving the variables LookUp and Income, we need to use Excel. We can create a chart where the x-axis represents the variable Income, and the y-axis represents the variable LookUp. We can then create two bars for each income level category (Less than $75k and $75k or more), with one bar representing the number of people who answered "Yes" and the other bar representing the number of people who answered "No".

This clustered bar chart suggests that there are more people in the lower income category who did not look up prices using their mobile phones, while the proportion of people who looked up prices using their mobile phones is relatively consistent across both categories in the higher income level.

c) To conduct a hypothesis test of whether Income is related to LookUp, we need to perform a chi-squared test of independence. We can use Excel to calculate the chi-squared statistic and the associated p-value. The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between Income and LookUp, while the alternative hypothesis is that there is a relationship between the two variables.

Based on the calculations using Excel, we obtain a chi-squared statistic of 0.889 and a p-value of 0.345. Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that Income is related to LookUp.

Learn more about it here:

https://brainly.com/question/31581931

#SPJ11

Therefore, based on the given results, the experimental probability of the coin landing on heads is 0.47 or 47%.

The potential for an event to occur is indicated by its theoretical probability. Since we know that flipping a coin has an equal chance of coming up heads or tails, the theoretical probability of receiving heads is 1/2. The experimental probability of an event is its likelihood of really occurring in an experiment.

The following formula can be used to determine the experimental probability of the coin landing on heads:

Experimental probability = Number of times the coin landed on heads / Total number of flips

In this case, the coin landed on heads 47 times out of a total of 100 flips. So:

Experimental probability = 47/100

Simplifying this fraction, we get:

Experimental probability = 0.47

To know more about experimental probability visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/22628286

#SPJ1

Question:

Dave continues flipping his coin until he has

100

100100 total flips, and the coin shows heads on

47

4747 of those flips.

Based on these results, what is the experimental probability of the coin landing on heads?

The rate at which the lateral surface area increases when h = 15m and r = 5m is 60π square meters per second or approximately 188.5 square meters per second.

To find the rate at which the lateral surface area of the cylinder increases, we need to use the formula for the lateral surface area of a cylinder:

Lateral Surface Area = 2πrh

We can use the chain rule to find the rate of change of the lateral surface area with respect to time:

dL/dt = d/dt(2πrh) = 2π(r dh/dt + h dr/dt)

where dh/dt is the rate at which the height is increasing (3 m/s) and

dr/dt is the rate at which the radius is increasing (1 m/s).

Substituting h = 15 m and r = 5 m, we get:

dL/dt = 2π(5(3) + 15(1)) = 2π(15 + 15) = 60π

Therefore, the rate at which the lateral surface area increases when h = 15m and r = 5m is 60π square meters per second or approximately 188.5 square meters per second.

for such more question on  surface area

https://brainly.com/question/27987869

#SPJ11

The probability that a single randomly selected value is between 201 and 205.3 is approximately 0.1615, or when rounded to four decimal places, 0.1615.

To answer your question, we'll first need to standardize the given values using the Z-score formula:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
Where Z is the Z-score, X is the value, μ is the population mean (p), and σ is the standard deviation (o).
First, find the Z-scores for 201 and 205.3:
Z1 = (201 - 202.9) / 10.5 ≈ -0.1810
Z2 = (205.3 - 202.9) / 10.5 ≈ 0.2286
Next, we need to find the probability corresponding to these Z-scores. You can do this by using a Z-table or a calculator with a built-in normal distribution function.
Using a Z-table or calculator, we find:
P(Z1) ≈ 0.4282
P(Z2) ≈ 0.5897
Now, to find the probability between Z1 and Z2:
P(201 < X < 205.3) = P(Z2) - P(Z1) ≈ 0.5897 - 0.4282 ≈ 0.1615
So, the probability that a single randomly selected value is between 201 and 205.3 is approximately 0.1615, or when rounded to four decimal places, 0.1615.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The statement that ax = bx implies a = b in any vector space is false, as there are cases where a and b can be different constants but still satisfy the equation.

In a vector space, the equation ax = bx does not necessarily imply that a = b. This is because there are scenarios where a and b could be different constants, yet still satisfy the equation.

In a vector space, scalar multiplication is defined as the multiplication of a vector by a scalar (a constant). If two vectors, x and y, are multiplied by different scalars, a and b respectively, and result in the same vector, i.e., ax = bx, it does not necessarily mean that a and b are equal. For example, consider the vector space of real numbers with scalar multiplication, and let x = 2. If a = 3 and b = 6, then ax = 3×2 = 6 = bx, even though a and b are not equal.

Therefore, the statement that ax = bx implies a = b in any vector space is false, as there are cases where a and b can be different constants but still satisfy the equation.

To learn more about vector here:

brainly.com/question/31265178#

#SPJ11

A light bulb manufacturer wants to advertise the average life of its light bulbs so it tests a subset of light bulbs. This is an example of inferential statistics.

The statement is true.

Inferential statistics is referred to that field of statistics which uses analytical tools to draw conclusions about a population by examining (or, surveying) random samples (taken from the population).

Inferential statistics generalizes the observations derived from the sample as the observations from the population.

Here, a light bulb manufacturer tests a subset of light bulbs and generalizes the result to all bulbs to advertise the average life of its light bulb. Thus, it is an example of inferential statistics.

Therefore, the given statement is true.

To know more about inferential statistics here

https://brainly.com/question/30761414

#SPJ4