Find the absolute maximum and minimum of the following function on the indicated interval. f (x) = (x^2(x + 3)^2/3, -3 ≤5 ≤-1 Ox -1 is absolute min., x =-9/4 is absolute max. Ox= -3 is absolute min., x = -9/4 is absolute max. Ox=0 is absolute min., x = -1 is absolute max. Ox= -3 is absolute min., x = -3/4 s absolute max. Ox=0 is absolute min., x = -3 is absolute max.

Answer:

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of a number x and 4 equals 12

x + 4 = 12

x = 8

So, the number is 8

Considering the given random sample of data: 12, 27, 29, 15, 23, 5, 8, 2, 110, 19

a) The median of the sample data is 17.

b) If the outlier is removed, 17 is the median of the remaining sample data.

a) To find the median of the sample data, we need to first arrange the numbers in order from smallest to largest: 2, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, 23, 27, 29, 110. Then, we can see that there are 10 numbers in the sample, so the median will be the average of the 5th and 6th numbers in the list. So, the median is (15 + 19)/2 = 17.
b) If the outlier (110) is removed, then the remaining sample data is 2, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, 23, 27, 29. Again, we arrange the numbers in order from smallest to largest: 2, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, 23, 27, 29. Now, we can see that there are 9 numbers in the sample, so the median will be the average of the 5th and 6th numbers in the list. So, the median of the remaining sample data is (15 + 19)/2 = 17.

To learn more about the median, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/28060453

#SPJ11

Using a t-test with a one-tailed distribution, the calculated t-value is (15.7-14)/(6/√42) = 2.69. Using a t-distribution table with 41 degrees of freedom (42-1), the p-value for this test is 0.0069. This means that there is strong evidence to suggest that the weight increase in the second trimester for expectant mothers is greater than 14 pounds.

To find the p-value for the hypothesis test, we will follow these steps:

1. State the null and alternative hypotheses:
  Null hypothesis (H₀): μ = 14 (The average weight increase in the second trimester is 14 pounds)
  Alternative hypothesis (H₁): μ > 14 (The average weight increase in the second trimester is greater than 14 pounds)
Based on the given information, the study conducted by CHDS found that the average weight increase in the second trimester for expectant mothers is 14 pounds. However, a random sample of 42 expectant mothers in 2015 showed that the mean weight increase in the second trimester is 15.7 pounds, with a standard deviation of 6.0 pounds. To determine if there is evidence that weight increase in the second trimester is greater than 14 pounds, a hypothesis test is conducted.
The null hypothesis (H0) is that the weight increase in the second trimester is equal to 14 pounds, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the weight increase in the second trimester is greater than 14 pounds.

2. Calculate the test statistic using the sample data:
  Test statistic = (Sample mean - Population mean) / (Sample standard deviation / √Sample size)
  Test statistic = (15.7 - 14) / (6.0 / √42)
  Test statistic ≈ 2.047

3. Determine the p-value using the test statistic and the standard normal distribution (Z-distribution):
  Since the alternative hypothesis is one-tailed (μ > 14), we will find the area to the right of the test statistic.
  Using a Z-table or calculator, we find the p-value for a Z-score of 2.047.
  p-value ≈ 0.0207

So, the p-value for the hypothesis test is approximately 0.0207, rounded to 4 decimal places.

Learn more about one-tailed:

brainly.com/question/17038447

#SPJ11

Answer: B 52%

Step-by-step explanation:

Percentages are usually out of 100%

so just subtract the other students vote percentage from 100

100% - 29% - 19% = 52%

In the study conducted by Wilkinson et al. (2021), the researchers investigated the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 among household contacts in the Winnipeg Health Region, Canada. The study included 28 individuals from 102 unique households. The findings of this research contribute to our understanding of COVID-19 transmission within households and can inform public health strategies to prevent further spread of the virus.

A study conducted by Wilkinson et al. in 2021 on the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 in household contacts in the Winnipeg Health Region in Canada. The authors of the study included 28 individuals from a total of 102 households in their analysis.

To provide a bit more context, the secondary attack rate refers to the proportion of individuals who develop COVID-19 after being exposed to a person with a confirmed case of the disease. In the case of household contacts, this would refer to individuals who live with someone who has tested positive for COVID-19.

Wilkinson et al.'s study aimed to investigate the factors that might affect the secondary attack rate in household contacts, such as the age and sex of the individuals involved, as well as any potential exposure to other sources of COVID-19 outside of the household. By analyzing data from a total of 102 households, the authors were able to provide valuable insights into the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 within households and the factors that might influence the likelihood of transmission occurring.

Overall, the study by Wilkinson et al. provides important information for public health officials and policymakers working to contain the spread of COVID-19, particularly in terms of understanding how the disease is transmitted within households and what factors might contribute to higher rates of transmission.

In the study conducted by Wilkinson et al. (2021), the researchers investigated the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 among household contacts in the Winnipeg Health Region, Canada. The study included 28 individuals from 102 unique households. The findings of this research contribute to our understanding of COVID-19 transmission within households and can inform public health strategies to prevent further spread of the virus.

To learn more about research, click here:

brainly.com/question/30468792

#SPJ11

Complete question: Wilkinson et al. (2021) studied the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 in houschold contacts in the Winnipeg Health Region, Canada. In their study, the authors included 28 individu- als from 102 unique households (102 primary cases and 279 household contacts). A total of 41 contacts from 25 households developed COVID-19 symptom in the 11 days since last un- protected exposure to the primary case. Calculate the secondary attack rate of COVID-19.

The joint density function of X and Y is given by f(y1,y2)={1/8 y1 e^-(y1+y2)/2, y1<0, y2>0; 0, the probability that a component of type II will have a life length in excess of 400 hours is 0.

To find the probability that a component of type II will have a life length in excess of 400 hours, we need to integrate the joint density function over the region where Y exceeds 4 (since the length is given in hundreds of hours).

So, we have:

P(Y > 4) = ∫∫ f(x,y) dx dy, where the limits of integration are x=-∞ to x=∞ and y=4 to y=∞

Substituting the given joint density function, we have:

P(Y > 4) = ∫∫ (1/8) y1 e^-(y1+y2)/2 dx dy, where the limits of integration are x=-∞ to x=∞ and y=4 to y=∞

Since the joint density function is zero elsewhere, we can simplify the limits of integration to:

P(Y > 4) = ∫4∞ ∫0∞ (1/8) y1 e^-(y1+y2)/2 dx dy

Evaluating the inner integral with respect to x, we get:

P(Y > 4) = ∫4∞ [(1/8) y1 e^-(y1+y2)/2] dy

Using integration by parts, we can simplify this integral to:

P(Y > 4) = [1/8] (e^-2) ∫4∞ y1 e^(y1/2) dy

Solving this integral, we get:

P(Y > 4) = [1/8] (e^-2) (8e^2 - 16e^2) = 1/2e^2 ≈ 0.675

Therefore, the probability that a component of type II will have a life length in excess of 400 hours is approximately 0.675.
To find the probability that a component of type II will have a life length in excess of 400 hours, we will focus on variable Y, which represents the length of life for components of type II. Since we are looking for the probability of Y > 4 (because the length is in hundreds of hours), we need to calculate the following integral:

P(Y > 4) = ∫[∫(1/8 * y1 * e^-(y1+y2)/2) dy1] dy2

Since the joint density function f(y1, y2) is defined for y1 < 0 and y2 > 0, the integral limits for y2 will be from 4 to infinity, while the integral limits for y1 will be from -infinity to 0. Thus, we have:

P(Y > 4) = ∫[∫(1/8 * y1 * e^-(y1+y2)/2) dy1] dy2, where the limits for y2 are 4 to infinity and the limits for y1 are -infinity to 0.

However, as we integrate over y1, we realize that y1 is always negative, which causes the joint density function to be 0, rendering the entire integral 0.

Therefore, the probability that a component of type II will have a life length in excess of 400 hours is 0.

To learn more about probability, click here:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The x and y component of the vector is -5 and 10 respectively (-5, 10).

The components of the vector is calculated as follows;

The initial position of the vector = (−3,4)

The final position of the vector =  (−2,6)

The sum of the x component of the vector is calculated as;

Vx = -3 + (-2) = -5

The sum of the y component of the vector is calculated as;

Vy = 4 + 6 = 10

= (-5, 10)

Thus, the x and y component of the vector is -5 and 10 respectively.

Learn more about vector components here: https://brainly.com/question/25705666

#SPJ1

c. =BINOM.DIST(3, 5, 0.2, TRUE)

1. This is a binomial probability problem since we have multiple-choice questions with a fixed probability of success (1 out of 5 or 0.2) for each question.

2. The Excel function for binomial probability is BINOM.DIST().

3. We want the probability of guessing less than four answers correctly, which means we need the cumulative probability of guessing 0, 1, 2, or 3 answers correctly.

4. Therefore, we use the formula "=BINOM.DIST(3, 5, 0.2, TRUE)", where 3 is the number of successes, 5 is the number of trials (questions), 0.2 is the probability of success (1/5), and TRUE indicates that we want the cumulative probability.

Learn more about binomial probability,

https://brainly.com/question/15246027

#SPJ11

The probability of selecting a female or a mathematics major or both is 0.7 or 70%.

To find the probability that the selected student will be female or a mathematics major or both, we need to add the probabilities of each event happening separately and then subtract the probability of both events happening at the same time.

First, the probability of selecting a female student is 25/50 = 0.5.

Second, the probability of selecting a mathematics major is 15/50 = 0.3.

Third, the probability of selecting a female mathematics major is 10/50 = 0.2.

To find the probability of selecting either a female or a mathematics major, we add the probabilities of each event happening separately:

0.5 + 0.3 = 0.8.

To find the probability of selecting both a female and a mathematics major, we multiply the probabilities of each event happening together:

0.5 x 0.2 = 0.1.

To find the probability of selecting either a female or a mathematics major or both, we subtract the probability of selecting both events at the same time from the sum of the probabilities of each event happening separately:

0.8 - 0.1 = 0.7.

Therefore, the probability of selecting a female or a mathematics major or both is 0.7 or 70%.

To know more about Probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

We can interpret this interval as follows: we are 98% confident that the true population variance falls within this interval.

To construct a 98% confidence interval for the population variance, we can use the following formula:

CI = [(n-1)s^2 / χ^2(α/2, n-1), (n-1)s^2 / χ^2(1-α/2, n-1)]

where n is the sample size, s is the sample standard deviation, χ^2(α/2, n-1) is the chi-squared value with α/2 degrees of freedom, and χ^2(1-α/2, n-1) is the chi-squared value with 1-α/2 degrees of freedom.

In this case, n = 35, s = 2.8, α = 0.02 (since we want a 98% confidence interval), and degrees of freedom = n-1 = 34.

Using a chi-squared table or calculator, we can find χ^2(α/2, n-1) to be 19.196 and χ^2(1-α/2, n-1) to be 53.984.

Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = [(n-1)s^2 / χ^2(α/2, n-1), (n-1)s^2 / χ^2(1-α/2, n-1)]

= [(34)(2.8^2) / 19.196, (34)(2.8^2) / 53.984]

= [3.662, 8.676]

Therefore, the 98% confidence interval for the population variance is (3.662, 8.676). We can interpret this interval as follows: we are 98% confident that the true population variance falls within this interval.

To learn more about confidence visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13242669

#SPJ11

The probability that at least one of the 3 randomly chosen respondents voted for pink is approximately 76.17%.

To find the probability that at least one of the three respondents chose pink, we need to calculate the probability that none of them chose pink and then subtract that from 1.

The probability that the first respondent did not choose pink is 0.62 (since 38% chose pink, the probability that the first respondent did not choose pink is 1-0.38=0.62). The probability that the second respondent did not choose pink is also 0.62, and the probability that the third respondent did not choose pink is also 0.62.

To find the probability that none of the three respondents chose pink, we multiply these probabilities together:

0.62 x 0.62 x 0.62 = 0.238328

So the probability that none of the three respondents chose pink is 0.238328.

To find the probability that at least one of them chose pink, we subtract this from 1:

1 - 0.238328 = 0.761672

So the probability that at least one of the three respondents chose pink is approximately 0.761672 or 76.17%.
To find the probability that at least one of the 3 randomly chosen respondents voted for pink, we can use the complementary probability method. First, let's find the probability that none of the 3 respondents chose pink.

The probability that a respondent did not choose pink is 1 - 0.38 = 0.62.

The probability that all 3 respondents did not choose pink is (0.62)^3 = 0.238328.

Now, we can find the complementary probability, which is the probability that at least one respondent chose pink: 1 - 0.238328 = 0.761672.

So, the probability that at least one of the 3 randomly chosen respondents voted for pink is approximately 76.17%.

To learn more about probability, click here:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

A. 8

This is because 564 divided by 73 is 7.72603 since it is over 7.4 you round up

Estimation is the calculated endeavor of producing an educated supposition or conjecture of a calculation, magnitude, or outcome founded on obtainable details.

It is utilized in many domains, comprising statistics, economics, engineering, and science, to prophesy unheard-of or forthcoming values or to quantify doubtfulness. Estimation necessitates utilizing mathematical models, data dissection, and other stratagems to supply an optimal guess of a value or outcome, oftentimes associated with an appraisal of the standard of trustworthiness or vagueness in the estimation.

Hence, the estimation of the given number is 8

Read more about estimation here:

https://brainly.com/question/28416295

#SPJ1

Using compatible numbers, which of the following is the best estimate for 564 ÷ 73?

A. 8

B. 9

C. 7

D. 6

Critical points are an essential aspect of any essay, as they demonstrate the writer's ability to analyze, evaluate and synthesize information.

To write critical points in an essay, start by identifying the key ideas or arguments presented in the text. Then, analyze these ideas and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. You can do this by asking questions such as "What evidence supports this claim?" or "What are the implications of this argument?"

Next, use your analysis to synthesize your own ideas and perspectives on the topic. This may involve drawing connections between different parts of the text, or bringing in outside sources to support or challenge the arguments presented. Remember to be clear and concise in your writing, and to use specific examples to illustrate your points.

Overall, the key to writing effective critical points in an essay is to be thorough, thoughtful and objective in your analysis. By carefully evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the text, and synthesizing your own ideas in response, you can create a compelling and persuasive argument that engages your reader and demonstrates your critical thinking skills.

learn more about Critical points

https://brainly.com/question/31017064

#SPJ11

The directional derivative of the function w = y2 + xz at point P(1, 2, 2) in the direction of vector v = 2i - j + 2k is 10/3.

To find the directional derivative of the function w = y2 + xz at point P(1, 2, 2) in the direction of vector v = 2i - j + 2k, we first need to find the gradient of the function at point P.
The gradient of a scalar-valued function is a vector that points in the direction of the maximum rate of increase of the function, and its magnitude is equal to the rate of increase in that direction.
So, the gradient of the function w = y2 + xz at point P is:
grad(w) = ∇w = [∂w/∂x, ∂w/∂y, ∂w/∂z]
Taking partial derivatives, we get:
∂w/∂x = z
∂w/∂y = 2y
∂w/∂z = x
Therefore, the gradient at point P(1, 2, 2) is:
∇w(P) = [2, 4, 1]
Next, we need to find the directional derivative in the direction of vector v. The directional derivative is the dot product of the gradient and the unit vector in the direction of v.
First, we need to find the unit vector in the direction of v:
|v| = √(2² + (-1)² + 2²) = √9 = 3
So, the unit vector in the direction of v is:
u = v/|v| = (2/3)i - (1/3)j + (2/3)k
Now, we can find the directional derivative:
Dv(w) = ∇w(P) · u = [2, 4, 1] · [(2/3)i - (1/3)j + (2/3)k]
= (2/3)(2) - (1/3)(-4) + (2/3)(1)

= 4/3 + 4/3 + 2/3
= 10/3

Learn more about scalar-valued function here:

https://brainly.com/question/31439366

#SPJ11

P(100 <= X <= 115) = sum[(800 choose i) * 0.15^i * (1 - 0.15)^(800 - i)] for i = 100 to 115

= 0.0349 (using a calculator or software)

This is a binomial distribution problem where the probability of success (having gluten sensitivity) is 0.15 and the number of trials (sample size) is 800.

a) The probability of exactly 115 individuals having gluten sensitivity is:

P(X = 115) = (800 choose 115) * 0.15^115 * (1 - 0.15)^(800 - 115)

= 0.0066 (using a calculator or software)

b) The probability of at least 107 individuals having gluten sensitivity is:

P(X >= 107) = 1 - P(X < 107)

= 1 - P(X <= 106)

= 1 - sum[(800 choose i) * 0.15^i * (1 - 0.15)^(800 - i)] for i = 0 to 106

= 0.1428 (using a calculator or software)

c) The probability of at most 100 individuals having gluten sensitivity is:

P(X <= 100) = sum[(800 choose i) * 0.15^i * (1 - 0.15)^(800 - i)] for i = 0 to 100

= 0.0002 (using a calculator or software)

d) The probability of between 100 and 115 individuals having gluten sensitivity is:

P(100 <= X <= 115) = sum[(800 choose i) * 0.15^i * (1 - 0.15)^(800 - i)] for i = 100 to 115

= 0.0349 (using a calculator or software)

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29062095

#SPJ11

For n=3, value of n are the line y = 3x + 1 and y = nx - 4 perpendicular.

Given that,

the line y = 3x + 1 and y = nx - 4

now, we have to find the value of n, for which the lines are perpendicular.

so, for line- 1:

y = 3x + 1

slope is: m1 = 3

for line -2:

y = nx - 4

slope is : m2 = n

we know that,

two lines are perpendicular to each other is, their slopes are equal.

i.e. m1 = m2

so, we get,

n = 3

Hence, For n=3, value of n are the line y = 3x + 1 and y = nx - 4 perpendicular.

To learn more on slope click:

brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ1

The solution to the differential equation is given by the equation arctan(x) + arctan(y) - ln|x²+y²+1| = C.

The differential equation is given as:

x(1+y²)dx-y(1+x²)dy=0

To solve this differential equation, we can start by rearranging the terms and separating the variables. We can start by dividing both sides by x(1+y²), which gives:

dx/(1+y²) - y(1+x²)/(x(1+y²)) dy = 0

Next, we can integrate both sides of the equation. On the left-hand side, we can use the substitution u = y² + 1, which gives du = 2y dy. The equation then becomes:

∫dx/(1+y²) - ∫(1+x²)/x du = C

where C is the constant of integration.

To solve the second integral on the right-hand side, we can use the substitution v = x², which gives dv = 2x dx. The equation then becomes:

∫dx/(1+y²) - ∫(1+v)/v dv = C

To solve the first integral, we can use the substitution y = tanθ, which gives dy = sec²θ dθ. The equation then becomes:

∫dx/cos²θ - ∫(1+v)/v dv = C

We can simplify the first integral using the trigonometric identity sec²θ = 1 + tan²θ. The equation then becomes:

∫dx/(1+ tan²θ) - ∫(1+v)/v dv = C

The first integral can be evaluated using the substitution x = tanφ, which gives dx = sec²φ dφ. The equation then becomes:

∫sec²φ dφ/(1+tan²θ) - ∫(1+v)/v dv = C

Simplifying the first integral using the identity sec²φ = 1 + tan²φ, the equation becomes:

∫(1+tan²θ) dθ/(1+tan²θ) - ∫(1+v)/v dv = C

The first integral simplifies to ∫dθ, which is just θ + K, where K is another constant of integration. Substituting back the variables, we have:

arctan(x) + arctan(y) - ln|v| = C

where v = x² and C = K - ln|D|, where D is a constant of integration.

Finally, we can substitute back the variables u = y² + 1 and v = x² to obtain the solution to the differential equation:

arctan(x) + arctan(y) - ln|x²+y²+1| = C

To know more about differential equation here

https://brainly.com/question/30074964

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Solve the differential equation:

x(1+y²)dx-y(1+x²)dy=0

The probability that the average sleep per night for 49 students will be less than 6.5 hours is 0.0143.

To answer this question, we can use the central limit theorem, which states that the sample means of large samples (n>30) will be normally distributed even if the population is not normally distributed.

First, we need to calculate the standard error of the mean, which is the standard deviation of the sample means. We can use the formula:

Standard error of the mean = standard deviation / square root of sample size

So, standard error of the mean = 1.6 / square root of 49 = 0.229

Next, we need to find the z-score for a sample mean of 6.5 hours, using the formula:

z = (sample mean - population mean) / standard error of the mean

z = (6.5 - 7) / 0.229 = -2.19

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the probability of getting a z-score less than -2.19, which is 0.0143 (rounded to 4 decimal places).

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Using the fundamental theorem of calculus, the integral of the three variables is calculated and multiplied by two, resulting in a volume of 4.

The volume of the solid is given by:

V = ∫∫∫dxdydz

= ∫∫∫2dxdy dz

= 2∫∫dydz

= 2∫2dz

= 4

The volume of the solid is calculated by integrating the three dimensions of space. The integral of x is integrated from 0 to 2, the integral of y is integrated from 0 to the surface of the solid, and the integral of z is integrated from 0 to 2. Using the fundamental theorem of calculus, the integral of the three variables is calculated and multiplied by two, resulting in a volume of 4.

Learn more about volume here

brainly.com/question/16134180

#SPJ4

complete question:

evaluate z dx dy dz, where s is the solid bounded by x y z = 2, x = 0, s y = 0, and z = 0.

The given rational number 7.84848484848...  can be represented in the form of the fraction [tex]\frac{868}{9801}.[/tex]

To express 7.84848484848... as a rational number, we can represent it as an infinite repeating decimal:

7.84848484848... = 7.84 + 0.004848484848...

Let x = 0.004848484848...

Then 100x = 0.4848484848...

Subtracting the two equations gives:

99x = 7.84848484848... - 7.84 = 0.00848484848...

Simplifying:

x = 0.00848484848... / 99

Now, we need to express 0.00848484848... as a fraction. Let y = 0.00848484848...

Then 100y = 0.848484848...

Subtracting the two equations gives:

99y = 0.84

Simplifying:

y = 0.84 / 99

Substituting back into the first equation:

x = (0.84 / 99) / 99

Simplifying:

x = 0.84 / (99^2)

Now we can add the two fractions:

7.84848484848... = 7.84 + x = 7.84 + 0.84 / (99^2)

Therefore, the rational representation of 7.84848484848... is:

p = 784 + 84 = 868

q = 99²

So, 7.84848484848... = 868/9801.

learn more about rational number,

https://brainly.com/question/24540810

#SPJ11

The probability that the patient actually has cancer given a positive test result is only about 5%.

Bayes' theorem:

Bayes' theorem (alternatively Bayes' law or Bayes' rule), named after Thomas Bayes, describes the probability of an event, based on prior knowledge of conditions that might be related to the event.

The risk of developing health problems is known to increase with age, Bayes' theorem allows the risk to an individual of a known age to be assessed more accurately by conditioning it relative to their age, rather than simply assuming that the individual is typical of the population as a whole.

One of the many applications of Bayes' theorem is Bayesian inference, a particular approach to statistical inference. When applied, the probabilities involved in the theorem may have different probability interpretations.

Bayesian probability interpretation, the theorem expresses how a degree of belief, expressed as a probability, should rationally change to account for the availability of related evidence.

Bayesian inference is fundamental to Bayesian statistics, being considered by one authority as; "to the theory of probability what Pythagoras's theorem is to geometry.

Calculate the probability that a patient actually has cancer given that they tested positive:

[tex]P(Cancer | Positive Test) = P(Positive Test | Cancer) \times P(Cancer) / P(Positive Test)[/tex]

where:

[tex]P(Positive Test | Cancer) = 0.8 (true positive rate)[/tex]

[tex]P(Cancer) = 0.01 (base rate)[/tex]

[tex]P(Positive Test) = P(Positive Test | Cancer) \times P(Cancer) + P(Positive Test | No Cancer) \times P(No Cancer)[/tex]

[tex]P(Positive Test | No Cancer) = 0.15 (false positive rate)[/tex]

[tex]P(No Cancer) = 0.99 (complement of the base rate)[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]P(Cancer | Positive Test) = (0.8 \times 0.01) / ((0.8 \times 0.01) + (0.15 \times 0.99))[/tex]

[tex]= 0.008 / 0.1565[/tex]

[tex]= 0.0511[/tex]

For similar questions on Probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

The sum of two rational numbers 1/2 and 5/2 is 3.

What is rational expression?

A rational expression is the ratio of two polynomials.

To add or subtract two rational expressions with the same denominator, we simply add or subtract the numerators and write the result over the common denominator.

If the denominators are not the same, we need to manipulate them to make them the same. In other words, we need to find a common denominator.

There are a few steps to follow when adding or subtracting rational expressions with different denominators.

To add or subtract rational expressions with different denominators,

Here given two rational numbers are 1/2 and 5/2.

We want to add them.

So,

[tex] \frac{1}{2} + \frac{5}{2} [/tex]

Here LCM of denominators of two numbers is 2.

So,[tex] \frac{1 + 5}{2} [/tex]

We are adding 1 and 5,

[tex] \frac{6}{2} = 3[/tex]

Therefore, sum of two rational numbers 1/2 and 5/2 is 3.

Learn more about rational expression here,

https://brainly.com/question/12088221

#SPJ1

Correct question is "Add the rational expression 1/2 and 5/2".

The standard error of the sample mean is $25,000, the probability that the sample mean exceeds $968,000 is 0.0735, or 7.35%.c. Using the same formula as in part b, we find: , the probability that the sample mean exceeds $935,000 is 0.8413, or 84.13%., the probability that the sample mean is between $930,000 and $963,000 is 0.4633, or 46.33%.

a. The standard error of the sample mean is calculated as:

SE = σ/√n

where σ is the standard deviation of the population, n is the sample size.

In this case, σ = $250,000 and n = 100.

SE = $250,000/√100 = $25,000

Therefore, the standard error of the sample mean is $25,000.

b. To calculate the probability that the sample mean exceeds $968,000, we need to standardize the sample mean using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / (σ / √n)

where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, σ is the population standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

In this case, x = $968,000, μ = $950,000, σ = $250,000, and n = 100.

z = ($968,000 - $950,000) / ($250,000 / √100) = 1.44

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the probability of a z-score being greater than 1.44 is approximately 0.0735.

Therefore, the probability that the sample mean exceeds $968,000 is 0.0735, or 7.35%.c. Using the same formula as in part b, we find:

z = ($935,000 - $950,000) / ($250,000 / √100) = -1

The probability of a z-score being less than -1 is approximately 0.1587. However, we are interested in the probability that the sample mean exceeds $935,000, which is equivalent to the probability that the z-score is greater than -1.

Using the symmetry of the normal distribution, we can subtract the probability of a z-score being less than -1 from 1 to find the probability of a z-score being greater than -1:

P(z > -1) = 1 - P(z < -1) = 1 - 0.1587 = 0.8413

Therefore, the probability that the sample mean exceeds $935,000 is 0.8413, or 84.13%.

d. To calculate the probability that the sample mean is between $930,000 and $963,000, we need to standardize both values:

z1 = ($930,000 - $950,000) / ($250,000 / √100) = -0.8

z2 = ($963,000 - $950,000) / ($250,000 / √100) = 0.52

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find the probability of a z-score being between -0.8 and 0.52 is approximately 0.4633.

Therefore, the probability that the sample mean is between $930,000 and $963,000 is 0.4633, or 46.33%.

Learn more about sample mean

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

The result of the equation 4.53 x 10⁵ + 2.2 x 10⁶ is 2.653 x 10⁶.

To solve this given equation,

One first needs to take the common exponent out in both numbers

i.e. we need to take common from 4.53 x 10⁵ and 2.2 x 10⁶ which comes out to be 10⁵

Therefore, using the distributive property of multiplication that states ax + bx = x (a+b)

we have, 4.53 x 10⁵ + 2.2 x 10⁶ = 10⁵ (4.53 + 2.2 x 10)

= 10⁵ (4.53 + 22)

= 10⁵ (26.53)

=26.53 x 10⁵

We convert this into proper decimal notation, and we get

=2.653 x 10⁶

Therefore, we get 2.653 x 10⁶ as the result of the given equation.

Learn more about Decimal notation:

brainly.com/question/31547833

#SPJ4

The distance between points (6,5) and (2,8) using the distance formula is 5 units.

The distance formula is written as:

[tex]=\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1} )^{2} +(y_{2}-y_{1})^{2} }[/tex]

Here, [tex](x_{1},x_{2}) and (y_{1},y_{2})[/tex] are (6,5) and (2,8) respectively.

Putting the values in the formula, we get

[tex]=\sqrt{(2-6)^{2}+(8-5)^{2} }[/tex]

[tex]=\sqrt{ {4^{2} +3^{2} }[/tex]

[tex]=[/tex][tex]\sqrt{25}[/tex]

[tex]=5[/tex]

Therefore, the distance between the points is 5 units.

To learn more about "distance formula", visit: https://brainly.com/question/27262878

The length of the missing side in the right triangle is 6.5

We can see that it is a right triangle, thus, we can use the Pythagorean's theorem.

It says that the sum of the squares of the legs is equal to the square of the hypotenuse.

So if x is the missing side, we can write:

x² + 3.6² = 7.4²

Solving that for x we will get.

x = √(7.4² - 3.6²) = 6.5

That is the length of the missing side.

LEarn more about right triangles at:

https://brainly.com/question/2217700

#SPJ1

National Electric incurred a total cost of $7,950 in producing the first 500 coffeemakers/day.

To find the total cost incurred by National in producing the first 500 coffeemakers/day, we need to calculate the sum of the fixed cost and the variable cost for producing 500 units.

The fixed cost is given as $700.

To find the variable cost, we first need to calculate the marginal cost function, which is the derivative of the cost function:

[tex]C'(x) = 0.00003x^2 - 0.03x + 24[/tex]

The variable cost of producing x units is given by integrating the marginal cost function from 0 to x:

[tex]C(x) = \int [0, x] C'(t) dt[/tex]

[tex]C(x) = \int [0, x] (0.00003t^2 - 0.03t + 24) dt[/tex]

[tex]C(x) = 0.00001t^3 - 0.015t^2 + 24 [0, x][/tex]

[tex]C(x) = 0.00001x^3 - 0.015x^2 + 24x[/tex]

So, the variable cost of producing 500 units is:

[tex]C(500) = 0.00001(500)^3 - 0.015(500)^2 + 24(500) = $7,250[/tex]

Therefore, the total cost incurred by National in producing the first 500 coffeemakers/day is:

Total cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost

Total cost = $700 + $7,250

Total cost = $7,950.

For similar question on Electric.

https://brainly.com/question/26978411

#SPJ11

The correct domain restriction that ensures f(x) has an inverse relation that is also a function is 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π.

A function that "undoes" the effect of another function, such as f(x), is said to have an inverse function. More specifically, the inverse function f inverse (x) translates elements of B back to elements of A if f(x) maps elements of A to elements of B.

In other words, (a,b) is a point on the graph of f(x), and (b,a) is a point on the graph of f inverse (x) if (a,b) is a point on the graph of f(x). In other words, the domain of f inverse(x) is the range of f(x), and vice versa. The domain and range of f(x) and f inverse(x) are interchanged.

Given the function of the graph is f(x) = cos x.

Now, cos x oscillates between -1 and 1, with a cycle of 2π.

To obtain the inverse relation we need to find an one to one specific interval.

The complete cycle is obtained for [0, 2π], thus giving the required specific interval.

Hence, the correct domain restriction that ensures f(x) has an inverse relation that is also a function is 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π.

Learn more about inverse function here:

https://brainly.com/question/2541698

#SPJ1

The average number of customers in the restaurant is 27.5 customers.

What are minutes?

Minutes are a measure of 60 seconds or one-sixtieth of an hour. It is frequently employed to measure brief time intervals in meetings, sporting events, cooking, and other tasks that need for exact timing.

We may use the M/M/1 queuing model,

M = Poisson arrival process

1 =  represents a single server.

Given:

Arrival rate (λ) = 5 customers per minute

Service time (μ) = 1/5 per minute (as customers wait for an average of 5 minutes)

Probability of eating in the restaurant (p) = 0.5

Probability of carrying out the order (1-p) = 0.5

Time required for a meal (T) = 20 minutes

Using the M/M/1 model, we can calculate the average number of customers in the restaurant (L) as:

L = (λ/μ) * (μ/(μ-λ)) * p + λ*T * (μ/(μ-λ)) * (1-p)

λ/μ = utilization factor

μ/(μ-λ) = average time a customer spends in the system

p = probability of eating in the restaurant

λ*T = average time a customer spends in the system if they carry out their order

We get:

L = (5/1) * (1/(1-5)) * 0.5 + 5*20 * (1/(1-5)) * 0.5

= 2.5 + 25

= 27.5

Therefore, the average number of customers in the restaurant is 27.5.

Learn more about Minutes from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/291457

#SPJ1