answer:
the questions are in bold letters. the answers are underneath
Explanation:
1. Explain why we need to overhaul and simplify the law and how the legal system has changed
The law according to howard is a powerful tool that has the power of driving human behaviors and the united states has to overhaul the laws and make the laws simple so that the Americans would have the passion to address the issues facing the US.
People live in fear of what might happen next. Due to easily getting sued as well as charges that could be pressed at work and almost in all aspects of ones life. The law is getting heavier as the time goes by. People are afraid that they may say something that would land them in court. There is the constant fear if lawsuits..
2. Discuss how these changes have influenced the daily lives of people in the United States? Briefly explain one example Howard gives.
People now find it difficult to take actions on what is their best judgements. Fewer people are standing up for themselves now.
3. Choose one of the three propositions that Howard makes and explain it.
One of his propositions is to re-establish the aims, objectives and the purposes of the law. when people know the requirements of the law they would know how best to avoid breaking it. Boundaries of the law have to be set so people will know what the law requires of them.
4. According to Howard, how can freedom be rebuilt?
Freedom can be rebuilt with effort from the society and the government agencies.
5. Do you agree or disagree with Howard that the legal system is broken? Why or why not?
I agree the legal system is broken. Too. many laws these days have people acting in certain ways. In schools for instance, school children feel they can act in anyway they like. Any correction is seen like their rights are being taken from them. Howards assessment of the healthcare system is correct. Instead of helping people the healthcare system is more concerned with how they can avoid lawsuits.
Your ex starts dating your best friend and you key their car. Now you violated a what?
Answer: the law
Explanation:
Which of the following most accurately describes the effect of the statute?
A) The statute trumps any and all conflicting law to the contrary.
B) If the statute conflicts with the United States Constitution, the United States Constitution controls.
C) The statute has no value and should not have been included in your notes.
Answer:
B.If the statue conflicts with the US
While the President of the United States has the power to veto federal laws passed by the U.S. House and Senate, the Governor of the State of Florida can veto which of the following?
Answer:
The Florida governor can veto state laws.
Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
Imagine that you have just been hired as a correctional officer. Your supervising officer has asked you to be on the lookout for contraband. What might you be looking for?
A.
incoming inmates
B.
contact forms
C.
illegal items
D.
commissary items
Your supervising officer has asked you to be on the lookout for contraband. That might you be looking for illegal items. The correct option is (C).
What do you mean by the correctional officer?An individual who works as a prison guard is known as a corrections officer.
A prison officer, also known as a corrections officer, is a uniformed member of law enforcement who is in charge of maintaining the safety, custody, and discipline of prisoners.
They are in charge of the care, custody, and supervision of those who have been found guilty of a crime and given prison sentences.
Along with other law enforcement duties, they are in charge of the facility's and its property's protection.
Although some are employed by private organizations that provide jail services to the government, the majority of prison officers or corrections officers are employed by the government of the jurisdiction in which they work.
Therefore, your supervising officer has asked you to be on the lookout for contraband. That might you be looking for illegal items.
To know more about the correctional officer, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19009502
#SPJ2
Use the quotation to answer the question.
"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare,
and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."
-excerpt from the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution
Which of the following most clearly reveals the Founders ideas about the source of
government power?
O "We the People"
O "a more perfect Union"
O "this Constitution"
O "our Posterity"

Answer:
A
Explanation:
The founders wanted the people to be the source of government power. Hence elections.
Jenson is a private security officer who works at the door of a club which is sanctioned to only allow individuals who are 21 and over to enter. The club owners ask Jenson and the other security officers to allow females under the age of into the club. Jenson does not feel comfortable with allowing this. He decides not to personally allow under-aged individuals in, but knows other security officers are allowing them in.
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons :
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical
1. if they are allowing individuals under the age of 21 in they need to have a stamp or a badge that has to be visable or they will be kicked out.
2 the individuals that are the age or above 21 should have a different badge that indicates that they are the age of or above 21 and must be visible or they will get kicked out.
3 if they are allowing underage individuals in they must have people watching them so they don't sneak alcoholic beverages.
Explanation:
How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion?
1. A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
3. A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.
4. A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.
Answer:
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
Explanation:
Answer:
what she said
Explanation:
The previous Activities have provided you with an economic and
ethical basis for evaluating kidney-transplant policies. Now it is time for you
to be the policy maker. Read the following information and then decide which
policy you support. Be ready to justify your decision. Which policy saves the
most lives? Which conforms most closely to the ethical framework you find most
acceptable?
OPTION 1: THE CURRENT SYSTEM
A national law makes it illegal to sell human organs. Anyone who sells a kidney
faces jail, fines or both. People may donate kidneys, however, and doctors dis-
tribute donated kidneys on the basis of need. Some of the factors they consider
in allocating kidneys are the patient’s age and medical condition, how long the
patient has been on a waiting list and whether the donor is in the local area.
Under this system, there is a shortage of kidneys, and many people are on a
waiting list for years. During this time they receive costly dialysis treatment,
and many people die.
OPTION 2: AN OPEN MARKET
Create an open market in kidneys. People may sell their kidneys on the mar-
ket for the highest price they can get. They may sell and deliver a kidney while
they are still alive, or they may sell for delivery after they die. Brokerage firms
match buyers and sellers. People could even sell kidneys on eBay. Recipients
would pay for the kidney the same way they pay for other medical care: with
their own funds or through insurance, government programs and charity.
OPTION 3: A REGULATED MARKET
Create a market in which anyone may sell a kidney, but only authorized insti-
tutions such as hospitals may legally buy. This option reduces the possibility
of acquiring kidneys through involuntary means such as theft or murder. The
institutions would allocate the kidneys on a basis similar to the way kidneys
are allocated today using age, medical need or time spent on a waiting list.
Recipients would pay for the kidneys with private funds, insurance,
government assistance and charity.
OPTION 4: A COMMUNITARIAN APPROACH
This approach uses nonmarket mechanisms to increase the supply in
several ways.
A marketing campaign would increase people’s awareness of the issue and alter
their preferences for organ donation through moral persuasion. The slogan for a
national television campaign might be “Friends don’t let friends waste the gift
of life.” This is not an appeal to altruism but to people’s sense of moral obliga-
tion and duty.
A more authoritarian policy would legally mandate that when people die, all
their organs will be donated unless they indicate otherwise. People who don’t
want to donate must take the extra step to note this in advance on their driv-
er’s license. Today people must agree in advance for their organs to be donated.
2 -3 paragraphs
Answer:
i don’t know
Explanation:
i don’t know
Need answers to Unit 4 lab questions
Forensics Lab Questions Unit 4
HS: Forensic Science I (E)(AL)
Answer:
Forensic lab testing is used for testing the samples collected during investigation. Confirmation test is performed to test the presence of toxin in the sample.
Explanation:
Insulin is a type of toxic which is useful for diabetic patients only if specific quantity is taken. The excess intake may be hazardous for the individual. Confirmation tests are performed on the samples collected from the body of victim to confirm the amount of insulin present.
What is katarungang Pambarangay
Answer: History
There has long been a traditional, local system of resolving disputes. Presidential Decree 1508 talks an unofficial "time-honored tradition of amicably settling disputes among family and barangay members at the barangay level without judicial resources".[7]
Alfredo Flores Tadiar was the principal author of Presidential Decree 1508, The Katarungang Pambarangay Law,[8] and he also wrote its implementing rules, requiring prior conciliation as a condition for judicial recourse.[citation needed] For 12 years (1980–1992), he was a member of the Committee of Consultants, Bureau of Local Government Supervision, which oversaw the nationwide operations of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law.[citation needed] Under the decree, the body was known as Lupong Tagapayapa .[7]
This decree was replaced by the Local Government Code of 1991.
Explanation: Katarungang Pambarangay
Katarungang Pambarangay, or the Barangay Justice System is a local justice system in the Philippines. It is operated by the smallest of the local government units, the barangay, and is overseen by the barangay captain, the highest elected official of the barangay and its executive.[1] The barangay captain sits on the Lupon Tagapamayapa along with other barangay residents, which is the committee that decides disputes and other matters. They do not constitute a court as they do not have judicial powers.[2]
The system exists to help decongest the regular courts and works mostly as "alternative, community-based mechanism for dispute resolution of conflicts,"[1] also described as a "compulsory mediation process at the village level."[3]
Throughout the Philippines the Barangay Justice Systems handles thousands of cases a year.[4] Since officials have more flexibility in decision-making, including from complex evidence rules, and receive some resources from government, the courts are more numerous and accessible than other courts and therefore the courts are able to hear more cases and to respond more immediately.[4]
The Katarungang Pambarangay share characteristics with similar traditional, hybrid courts in other countries such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Nigeria and South Africa, among others.[5] Such courts emerged during colonial periods as Western imperial powers introduced western legal systems.[5] The Western legal systems were usually applied to westerners while the local dispute resolution systems were integrated into the Western system in a variety of ways including incorporation of local decision makers into the government in some way.[5] After independence, many states faced the same problems as their former rulers, especially "limited geographical reach of state institutions, Western-modeled institutions often divorced from community structures and expectations, and resource constraints in the justice sector."[5] Hybrid courts became a "middle ground for supporting community decision-making while simultaneously expanding the authority and reach of the state."[5]
Besides "hybrid courts", other authors have described the system as a "Non-State Justice System".[6]
Answer:
Katarungang Pambarangay, or the Barangay Justice System is a local justice system in the Philippines. It is operated by the smallest of the local government units, the barangay, and is overseen by the barangay captain, the highest elected official of the barangay and its executive.
Explanation:
Hope i helped! <3
While creating a test for his trainees, Max, a correctional officer, lists the following question: To avoid injury and do their jobs effectively, correctional officers must be physically competent, self-disciplined, and _____. Which of the following is the BEST choice to fill in the blank?
A.
amiable
B.
agreeable
C.
ambitious
D.
alert
Answer:
d
Explanation:
While creating a test for his trainees, Max, a correctional officer, lists the following question: To avoid injury and do their jobs effectively, correctional officers must be physically competent, self-disciplined, and alert. Hence, option D is correct.
What is physically competent?Physical competence is the ability to perform a variety of movements for various lengths of time and intensities, as well as the capability to develop movement techniques and patterns.
Physical literacy is the ability to move competently and confidently in a variety of physical activities in situations that support a person's overall development.
A person's physical literacy is demonstrated when they can catch, jump, run, swim, or throw. These kinds of skills work as the pillars on which children can build a strong foundation from which they can comfortably engage in a growing range of activities as they grow.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about physically competent, click here
https://brainly.com/question/14642339
#SPJ2
1
How does monarchy differ from other forms of government?
A. Leaders are named in the constitution.
B. Leaders are chosen by the upper class.
c. Leaders are born into ruling families.
D. leaders are given power by kings.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Monarchism has to do with power being passed down by bloodline.
James is a lawyer who is representing a victim of domestic abuse in a case
presided over by Judge Danner. During an unofficial conversation in the hallway,
James talks to Judge Danner about the woman's restraining order stating she moved into her parents home out of fear, but her parents' home is not on the list of addresses banned on the restraining order. Judge Danner decides to write the parents' address on a photocopy of the restraining order and authenticated the document without adding the new document to the court records.
A. Ethical
B. Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical as it would be considered "ex parte"
Explanation:
ex parte- with respect to or in the interests of one side only or of an interested outside party.
he had an unnoficial conversation
the person who acquires real property under the terms of a will is known as a
Answer:
Devisee
Explanation:
Devisee is the term associated to the individual who is left with the real estate property according to the terms of the bill. A devisee may or may not be related with the decedent. It is because of the presence of devisee in the will of the decedent that the devisee receives the property and becomes the owner of it. In the case where the property is left with with the devisee becomes the owner.
I was surfing the net yesterday when I found a kolkata based Online Escort Service on this url - https://escort.Net.In/ . My questions are:- 1) Are these home escorts legal in India? 2) Why is this site still on the Internet. I am a law student and I am curious.
Answer:
1) Escort services are very legal in India
2) If Escort services are legal in India then they also have the right to be online
Explanation:
Prostitution is legal in India.
According to an article, commercial sex operations is the oldest profession in India. So in a rather intricate twist, whilst prostitution is legal, its related activities are not. Activities such as pimping, owning, and managing a brothel is illegal.
Some of the major cities where these related activities take place are Mumbai, Delhi, and Kolkata, and they are operational in very large numbers.
The act which regulates such activities (that is prostitution and its ancillary activities) and defines the parameters under which they may be practiced is the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act or ITPA.
The act prohibits prostitutes from advertising themselves. The website uses the word escort, instead of prostitutes also, they have removed from their contact page a physical location except for a phone number and an email. So even if they can be proven to have broken any laws, it may be difficult to trace them.
In addition, given that the "escorts" didn't give out their number, and it cannot be proven from the website that they are carrying out their activities within locations that are very close to public places, the legal action against them may be limited if not impossible.
Cheers
1. How does social learning theory differ from the psychoanalytic theory? Consider the implications of each theoretical model for responding to delinquent youth.
Answer and Explanation:
The theory of social learning states that the actions and ways of acting of young delinquents are the result of living with delinquent adults. This is because children have the ability to repeat the behavior of adults, taking for themselves the activities they do. Thus, according to this theory, young delinquents are victims of an inhospitable environment where they live with criminal adults and end up learning these practices.
Psychoanalytic theory, on the other hand, asserts that the acts, activities and personalities of young deliquesentes are innate elements of their id, ego and superego. This indicates that the criminal activities in which they are involved have been reasoned by their own minds and that, therefore, it is necessary to understand their personalities to reach a conclusion about their crimes.
Which of the following jobs in the field of criminal justice pays the least?
A.
police officer
B.
correctional officer
C.
probation officer
D.
forensic scientist
Answer:
B. correctional officer
Explanation:
The jobs in the field of criminal justice pay the least is a correctional officer. Thus the correct option is B.
What is Job?A Job is referred to what an individual chooses as a profession to earn something. A career of an individual is based on his talents, skills, and abilities which help him to seek growth and development and achieve the goals of life.
Correctional officers are in charge of maintaining a close eye on people who have been jailed while they appear in court, as well as those who have been given prison or imprisonment punishment.
The job of a corrections officer in the field of criminal justice is paid the least because they do not have any active role in the investigation as compared to other options which play a significant role in any criminal case.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
learn more about Job, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17205577
#SPJ2
1. James is a lawyer who is representing a victim of domestic abuse in a case
presided over by Judge Danner. During an unofficial conversation in the hallway,
James talks to Judge Danner about the woman’s restraining order stating she
moved into her parents home out of fear, but her parents’ home is not on the list of
addresses banned on the restraining order. Judge Danner decides to write the
parents’ address on a photocopy of the restraining order and authenticated the
document without adding the new document to the court records.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
2. Tom is a police officer. At a dinner party, a group of people are speaking in a
derogatory manner about people of a certain race. Tom believes the conversation
is inappropriate, but decides to excuse himself from the table until the
conversation is over rather than expressing his opinion.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
illegal
1 the woman herself didn't add that address
2 the judge had no right or lawful right to add that himself because its the woman's choice. what if she didn't want that address on thier?
Explanation:
How many police zones does Port Orange FL have?
Answer:
the ans is six divisions
An implied power is one that
is clearly outlined in the Constitution.
gives the Supreme Court power to revise the Constitution.
overrules the wording of the Constitution.
is suggested by the Constitution, but not specifically stated.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The answer is "Is suggested by the Constitution, but not specifically stated."
Please mark brainlest!
People can hold power for any reason. An implied power is one that is suggested by the Constitution.
What is implied power of the Supreme Court in the Constitution?The part of the constitution that talks about this power is found in Section 2 of Article III.
This is known to gives the judicial power to the Supreme Court judicial in regards to all Cases, in regard also to Law and Equity and that emanates under this Constitution.
This implies that the Supreme Court's role is to decide if laws used are constitutional in nature.
Learn more about An implied power from
https://brainly.com/question/1569756
Jason is a correctional officer who will be testifying at an inmate's parole hearing. The inmate's family lives in the same neighborhood as Jason, and brings over some cookies while Jason is home and tells him they hope Jason will make the right decision at the hearing. Jason decides not to take the cookies from the family himself, and instead asks his wife to accept the cookies.
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C.Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical
1 what if the cookies where spiked. then what would he do?
2 if the cookies had something she was allergic to and they didn't ask
3 maybe their familie was being nice but i think the parole officer didn't trust them so led the exception to his wife to make sure
Explanation:
The three interdependent branches of the U.S. CJS are the courts, the corrections system, and the
O legal branch
O law enforcement branch
O legislative branch
O executive branch
at a particular crime scene the victims body is on the floor lying in a pool of blood with a knife stuck into the chest. bloody shoe print marks are everywhere. the drapes in the living room are wide open and the door to the bedroom is ajar. a table lamp is lying on the floor at the far end of the bedroom and the window is wide open. a half filled glass of water is it's on the kitchen counter. in the bathroom the tap is still running and the mirror is smashed into pieces. investigators think there is a possibility that an eyewitness was present when the perpetrator killed the victim. which four items at the crime scene are likely to have been disturbed by the eyewitness. justify your answer.
Answer:
If investigators think there is a possibility that an eyewitness was present when the victim was killed, the four items that would likely have been disturbed by the eyewitness would be the bathroom tap (because they may have washed the blood off their hands), the shoeprints (because they would have likely walked around and got blood on their shoe), the half-filled glass of water (because they may have had a drink of water because they were nervous or stressed), and the door to the bedroom being ajar (they would have left through there).
Explanation:
PLATO!
Considering the crime scene, the four items that the possible eyewitness may have disturbed are -
-the exact scene where the shoe prints are found on the pool of blood,
-the bedroom door,
-the table lamp on the floor, and
-the bedroom window wide open.
An area or place where a crime occurs is known as the crime scene. This scene is where investigators first look for clues to determine the cause of death and try to find clues for the suspect.
Disturbance of a crime scene can be anything that destroys, modifies, or alters the way the original crime scene is. From the moment the victim dies and the suspect is nowhere to be seen, that area becomes a primary crime scene and must be undisturbed until the forensic team can get proper and adequate pictures or information or items from it. It is human instinct to try to get away from anything that is harmful to us. Likewise, it will also be the eyewitness's first instinct to try to get away from the scene as fast as possible and far away too. Now, considering the given crime scene described in the question, we can assume that the four items disturbed by the possible eyewitness are as below-(1) The presence of the bloo dy footprints around the dead body shows that the eyewitness may have tried to revive or check whether the person is still alive or not. Or, it may also be that he/she ran over the dead body to escape.
(2) The open bedroom door suggests the person went through there to get away from the scene.
(3) The table lamp on the floor suggests that it may have been knocked off by the eyewitness when trying to escape through the bedroom window.
(4) the open bedroom window suggests the eyewitness escaped through the bedroom and not through the main entrance or back door.
Learn more about crime scenes here:
brainly.com/question/17699399
Anna quit a criminal life as a thief after she got married and had children. Now she leads a busy life, looking after her children and taking care of the house. Which aspect of life course theory does this situation support?
A.
A routine, structured life leaves less time to interact with delinquent peers.
B.
After marriage, delinquent peers do not entertain other individuals.
C.
A person quits criminal life on his or her own.
D.
An unsteady life leads to persistent offending.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
She doesn't have time to be a thief anymore now that her kids need her. Her busy routine is stopping her.
Answer: a routine, structured life leaves less time to interact with delinquent peers
Explanation: got it right on the test
write a short note on state reorganisation commission
Answer:
The States Reorganisation Commission constituted by the Central Government of India on 22 December 1953 to recommend the reorganisation of state boundaries. In 1955, after nearly two years of study, the Commission recommended that India's state boundaries should be reorganised to form 14 states and 6 territories.
Explanation:
:)
How has public opinion affected the release of offenders back into the community? Have these changes helped offenders to reduce recidivism? Explain your answer using facts
Answer:
How has public Opinion affected the release Of offendors Back Into the community?:
Toward Shared Safety: The First-Ever National Survey of America's Safety Gaps
Alliance for Safety and Justice, September, 2020
“Broad consensus exists at the neighborhood level and across different demographics: public safety policies and investments should prioritize violence prevention, recovery, mental health, reentry and the most effective strategies to stop the cycle of crime”
Have these changes Helped offenders To reduce Recidivism?: More recently, researchers have established that cognitive treatment programs delivered with professional standards can reduce recidivism by 25 to 35 percent. ... But adding treatment to incarceration provides hope to offenders now, and benefits to society in the future
Explanation:
All I can do for now hope it helps!
An economic system in which the government owns the primary means of production is called
direct democracy
autocracy
socialism
constitutional monarchy
Tom is a police officer. At a dinner party, a group of people are speaking in a derogatory manner about people of a certain race. Tom believes the conversation is inappropriate, but decides to excuse himself from the table until the conversation is over rather than expressing his opinion.
A.Ethical
B. Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
c. illegal
Explanation:
6. Dion is a police officer who gets called to a disturbance at a retail store. A
teenager has been begging for money, and the store owner wants the teenager
arrested for harassing customers. Dion knows the teenager lives with his
grandfather and the family has not been able to make ends meet financially. Dion
decides not to arrest the teenager. Instead Dion gives the teenager a warning and
provides him with some information on where to go to for help.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
7. Anka is a correctional officer. After getting to know an inmate well, the inmate asks
Anka to smuggle in some of the inmate’s favorite junk food. The inmate offers to
pay a large amount of money, if Anka does it. Anka does not need the extra
money, so she decides to bring in the food for the inmate without accepting the
bribe.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
8. Jenson is a private security officer who works at the door of a club which is
sanctioned to only allow individuals who are 21 and over to enter. The club
owners ask Jenson and the other security officers to allow females under the age
of 21 into the club. Jenson does not feel comfortable with allowing this. He
decides not to personally allow under-aged individuals in, but knows other security
officers are allowing them in.
Ethical
Unethical
Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
ethical
1.the teenager as known this is his first time doing this and he was let off with a warning witch is resonable and ok to do so.
2. the teenager was let off with information of where to get help with money
3. what this police officer has done was perfectly fine and legal however if the teenager had attempted this before the teenager would be arrested.
Explanation:
