No, Potter was not being honest when he says the United States is in Vietnam to defend the freedom of the Vietnamese people
Why was president Johnson involved in the war of the Vietnamese?The controversy about whether President Johnson was telling the truth at the time about why America entered the Vietnam War is still going strong today.
On the one hand, Johnson and other American officials frequently emphasized the necessity to halt the development of communism and defend South Vietnam's sovereignty as their main reasons for getting involved in the battle.
Many war opponents, however, countered that the language of preserving freedom and democracy was exploited to justify an unfair and ultimately fruitless struggle and that the U.S. government's true aims were more nuanced and self-serving.
Read more on Vietnam war here:https://brainly.com/question/12918391
#SPJ1
What was a black and tan saloon, and what was their reputation among the police?
A black and tan salon was a term used to describe a "bar or tavern" open to black and white patrons during segregation in the United States. These establishments were often viewed as controversial and gained a reputation for being places where racial tensions could flare up. Despite this, black and tan saloons were popular among people who sought to defy segregation laws and social norms.
The police often viewed black and tan salons with suspicion and skepticism due to their reputation as places where fights and other disturbances could break out. As a result, police officers would sometimes raid these establishments, leading to arrests and confiscation of alcohol. In some cases, black and tan saloons were also associated with illegal activities such as gambling and prostitution, further fueling law enforcement's negative view of these establishments.
Overall, black and tan salons played a significant role in the struggle for civil rights in the United States and were seen by some as symbols of defiance against segregation. However, they also had a reputation for being rowdy and potentially dangerous places, often putting them at odds with the police.
To learn more about black and tan salons, visit: https://brainly.com/question/14471840
#SPJ11
Summarize the philosophical framework upon which the Nazis' 'Germany for Germans' idea, and the desire to expel the Jews of the country in aid of building the national community, was built: (social darwinism argued)
The philosophical framework upon which the Nazis 'Germany for Germans' idea, and the desire to expel the Jews of the country in aid of building the national community, was built on social dwarfism.
Social Darwinism held that people were subject to the same laws of natural selection and the survival of the fittest as other animals. The Nazis believed that Jews were a lower race and a degenerate people who threatened the supremacy and strength of the German nation. The German race was seen as superior to all others by the Nazis.
They argued that a number of Germany's social and economic problems could be attributed to Jews, who posed a threat to the nation as a whole. The need for racial purity and the idea of racial superiority, two main doctrines of Nazi ideology, were used to defend some of the most heinous crimes that shows a criminal behavior.
Learn more about Social Darwinism at:
brainly.com/question/30043359
#SPJ4
What message might President Truman have been trying to send to the American people
by only sending the navy and airforce?
President Truman was trying to send a message that our airforce and navy are all we need to stop Korea.
After the invasion of Korean countries, Truman announced that he's ordering U.S. Airforce and naval forces to South Korea to useful resource the democratic state in order to give a befitting reply to the invasion by using communist North Korea. He wanted to give a message that these two forces of US army are capable of defending the invasion of Korea, as a showcase of power of US military.
He ordered the combined effort of both the forces to take action against Korea. It was a cold war which was basically based on opinions and belief of the nations.
Learn more about President Truman at:
brainly.com/question/14720721
#SPJ4
What characteristic of U.S. government was developed from O rule of law O natural law O social contract O separation of powers
The characteristic of the U.S. government that was developed from separation of powers is the distribution of power among the three branches of government: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
What is a government?Government refers to the system or group of people that exercises authority and control over a society or the community. The main functions of government include providing for the common good and welfare of its citizens, maintaining law and order, regulating economic activity, and representing the interests of the people both nationally and internationally. The form and structure of government can vary widely, from authoritarian regimes to democracies. In a democratic system, the government is usually elected by the people and operates on the principle of majority rule, while in an authoritarian system, the government holds all power and authority. Ultimately, the purpose of government is to create a stable and orderly society that promotes the well-being and safety of its citizens.
To learn more about government, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5567539
#SPJ1
The form of the Apollo 11 stones in keeping with what is known of the hunting and foraging societies is that:
a. They are considered portable
b. They are permenant and in a sacred space
c. Sandstone was the only medium charcoal would adhere to
d. Charcoal was their only source of pigment
The form of the Apollo 11 stones is in keeping with what is known of the hunting and foraging societies because they are considered portable. The correct option is a. They are considered portable.
These societies were nomadic and needed their art to be easily transportable. The Apollo 11 stones are small and lightweight, making them easy to carry from place to place. They were likely used as talismans or to tell stories during social gatherings.
Additionally, the stones were not permanent and were not placed in a sacred space. Hunting and foraging societies did not have permanent settlements, so their art was not meant to be permanent either. The Apollo 11 stones were likely left behind when the group moved on to a new location.
Lastly, charcoal was the only source of pigment available to these societies. They did not have access to other types of pigments, so they used what was readily available to them. Sandstone was the only medium that charcoal would adhere to, making it the obvious choice for their art. Overall, the form of the Apollo 11 stones is reflective of the practical and resourceful nature of hunting and foraging societies. The correct option is a. They are considered portable.
For more about Apollo 11:
https://brainly.com/question/1170412
#SPJ11
By 1920 which social class guided the nation's way of life and how did Riis's life parallel the nations transformation?
By 1920, the upper class had largely become the guiding force of the nation's way of life. This was due in part to the growth of industrialization and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few powerful individuals.
Jacob Riis's life paralleled this transfor mation in a number of ways. As a Dan ish immigrant who arrived in the United States in 1870, Riis experienced the hardships and struggles of life in the lower class.
However, through hard work and determination, he was able to rise up the social ladder and become a successful journalist and reformer. His work documenting the living conditions of the poor and advocating for social change helped to shine a light on the inequalities of American society.
Ultimately, Riis's life serves as a reminder that social class is not a fixed position, but rather something that can be changed through individual effort and collective action.
To know more about wealth refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29993986#
#SPJ11
21) A frontier, in contrast to a boundary,
A frontier, in contrast to a boundary :is an area rather than a line. The correct answer is A.
A frontier is an area where different territories meet and blend into each other, and it can be a physical or cultural border that separates different regions. It is not a fixed line but a fluid and dynamic area where people interact and exchange goods, ideas, and customs.
In contrast, a boundary is a fixed line that separates two distinct territories or entities, such as states or countries. Boundaries are often marked by physical features, such as mountains, rivers, or walls, and they define the legal and political jurisdiction of each entity.
While frontiers are often associated with conflict and tension, they can also be places of cooperation and mutual enrichment, where different cultures and ways of life coexist and thrive.
Therefore, the main difference between a frontier and a boundary is that a frontier is an area of interaction and blending, while a boundary is a fixed line of separation.
To know more about frontier, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30629143#
#SPJ11
A frontier, in contrast to a boundary
A. is an area rather than a line
B. separates two states
C. is a region of ethnic conflict
D. Has become a more common means to separate states
E. all of the above
In the early 1800s, American foreign policy was largely defined by
A. colonization in Latin America.
B. expansion across the continent.
C. relations with American Indians.
D. struggles with Britain and France.
Hi! In the early 1800s, American foreign policy was largely defined by: struggles with Britain and France. The correct option is D.
During this period, the United States faced numerous challenges from both European powers, which greatly influenced its foreign policy decisions.
Britain and France were engaged in the Napoleonic Wars, and both countries attempted to restrict neutral countries, like the United States, from trading with their enemy. This led to the United States implementing measures like the Embargo Act of 1807, which aimed to protect American interests by restricting trade with foreign nations.
The War of 1812 was another significant event during this time, as it stemmed from unresolved issues between the United States and Britain. Some of these issues included impressment of American sailors by the British and disputes over territory in North America.
The war ultimately ended with the Treaty of Ghent in 1814, which restored pre-war boundaries and set the stage for improved relations between the two countries.
The Monroe Doctrine of 1823 was another key aspect of American foreign policy during the early 1800s. This policy asserted that the Western Hemisphere was no longer open to colonization by European powers and that any attempt to interfere in the affairs of the independent nations of the Americas would be considered an act of aggression.
In summary, the early 1800s saw American foreign policy largely defined by struggles with Britain and France. This period involved trade restrictions, the War of 1812, and the establishment of the Monroe Doctrine, all of which shaped the United States' approach to international affairs at the time.
To know more about American foreign policy, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29790938#
#SPJ11
Mughal emperors relied in the regional states of India to collect?a. Cropsb. Money for the governmentc. Resourcesd. Livestock
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Money for the government.
Explanation:
Mughal emperors ruled India from the 16th century to the 19th century, and they relied heavily on the regional states of India to collect revenues for the central government. These revenues were collected in the form of taxes on crops, land, and commerce, and they helped to fund the Mughal army and government. The regional states would be responsible for collecting the taxes within their respective territories, and they would then send the revenues to the central government in the form of cash or kind. This system of taxation helped to establish a centralized and powerful Mughal state, but it also contributed to economic exploitation and social inequality in India.
Home attendance for a game of footballAnnual traffic fatalities in a country.
Home attendance for a game of football and annual traffic fatalities in a country are both examples of discrete data, where the data points can only take on specific, individual values.
For example, home attendance for a game of football might be 50,000, 60,000, or 70,000, but not 63,482. Similarly, annual traffic fatalities in a country might be 100, 200, or 300, but not 238.5.
However, these two examples differ in their units of measurement. Home attendance for a game of football is measured in the number of people attending a specific event, while annual traffic fatalities in a country are measured in the number of deaths over a specific time period. Additionally, these two examples differ in their context and relevance. Home attendance for a game of football is primarily of interest to sports fans and teams, while annual traffic fatalities in a country are of concern to policymakers and the general public as a measure of public safety.
Learn more about the football:
brainly.com/question/31190909
#SPJ4
which of the causes of the great depression do you feel was the most significant? explain your answer.
Answer:
In my opinion, the most significant cause of the Great Depression was the stock market crash of 1929.
The stock market crash marked the beginning of the Great Depression, as it caused widespread panic and led to a dramatic decline in consumer spending and business investment. This, in turn, resulted in a decrease in production, layoffs, and a rise in unemployment.
The stock market crash was not the only cause of the Great Depression, but it played a crucial role in amplifying the economic downturn. Other factors that contributed to the Great Depression include:
Overproduction and underconsumption: During the 1920s, there was a rapid increase in industrial production, but wages did not increase at the same rate, leading to a decline in consumer purchasing power and overproduction of goods.
Unequal distribution of wealth: The economic boom of the 1920s led to a significant increase in the concentration of wealth among the wealthy elite, leaving the majority of Americans with little purchasing power.
Banking crisis: Many banks had invested heavily in the stock market and lost significant amounts of money, causing widespread bank failures and a loss of savings for many Americans.
Explanation:
who gets radicalized, and how does it happen?
Answer:
Many social groups get radicalized. It happens when someone supports extremist views and can be motivated by ideologies, religious studies, or political beliefs.
All of these are describing issues that were successfully addressed during what era?
A) Era of Prohibition
B) Jacksonian Era
C) Era of Good Feelings
D) Progressive Era
· Women's suffrage
· tighter Child Labor laws
· land conservation programs
· "Trustbusting" of corporations
Answer:
D progressive era
Explanation:
Progressive Era?
The Progressive Era, which lasted from the late 1890s to the early 1920s, was a period of increased political activism and social reform in the United States. During this era, the National American Woman Suffrage Association initially emphasized state-level efforts to secure voting rights for women
Why was Castro angry? (All that apply)
- khrushchev turning ships around
- Soviet ambassador denying the fact that missiles exist in cubs
-US reconnaissance flights
Fidel Castro, the leader of Cuba, was angry for several reasons during the Cuban Missile Crisis:
US reconnaissance flights: The US conducted numerous reconnaissance flights over Cuba during the crisis, which revealed the presence of Soviet missiles on the island. These flights were seen as a violation of Cuban sovereignty, and Castro was angry that the US was spying on his country.Khrushchev turning ships around: In the early days of the crisis, the Soviet Union sent ships carrying missiles and other military equipment to Cuba. However, under pressure from the US, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev agreed to turn the ships around and withdraw the missiles from Cuba. This was a major blow to Castro, who had been counting on the Soviet Union for support and protection.Soviet ambassador denying the existence of missiles in Cuba: During the crisis, the Soviet ambassador to the UN, Valerian Zorin, repeatedly denied the existence of Soviet missiles in Cuba. This was seen as a betrayal by Castro, who had allowed the missiles to be placed in Cuba in the first place. Castro was angry that the Soviet Union was backing down in the face of US pressure, and felt that Cuba was being left vulnerable to attack.In conclusion, Castro was angry during the Cuban Missile Crisis for several reasons, including US reconnaissance flights over Cuba, Khrushchev turning ships around, and the Soviet ambassador denying the existence of missiles in Cuba. These factors contributed to a sense of betrayal and vulnerability on the part of the Cuban leader.
for similar questions on Fidel Castro
https://brainly.com/question/15948508
#SPJ11
10. The focus of Heraclius and Leo III was to resist numerous invasions from what people?
The focus of Heraclius and Leo III was to resist numerous invasions from the Arab people. The Arab invasions started in the early 7th century and continued throughout the Byzantine Empire's reign.
Heraclius was able to stop the Arab invasion for a brief time by defeating them in battle, but the Arabs eventually came back stronger and continued to invade. Leo III also faced Arab invasions during his reign and implemented military reforms to improve the Byzantine army's strength and readiness.
The Arab invasions were a significant threat to the Byzantine Empire and required strong leadership and military tactics to resist their advances.
To know more about Byzantine ,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2896521#
#SPJ11
Tribal existence normally involves mutual obligations between
Group of answer choices
tribal members only.
a father and his children only.
all homo-sapient human beings.
tribal and non-tribal members.
The correct option is "tribal members only." Tribal existence normally involves mutual obligations between tribal members only.
What is Non Tribal Members?
Non-tribal members are individuals who are not part of a specific tribal community. They do not share the same cultural traditions, ancestry, or social structures as the members of the tribe. Non-tribal members can include individuals from other ethnic or cultural groups, as well as people from within the same geographical region who are not part of the tribe. In some cases, non-tribal members may interact with tribal communities, either through trade or other forms of exchange, but they do not have the same mutual obligations or responsibilities as tribal members do towards each other.
These obligations may include sharing resources, providing mutual support and protection, participating in communal rituals and ceremonies, and upholding cultural traditions and customs. While some tribes may have interactions with non-tribal members, their primary obligations are towards their own tribal community.
Learn more about Non Tribal Members
https://brainly.in/question/7037488
#SPJ1
What was Japan's first move of aggression in the early 1930s?
Answer:
The Japanese invasion of Manchuria
Explanation:
Japan's first aggressive move in the early 1930s was the invasion of Manchuria, located in northeastern China. This event occurred in 1931, when Japanese soldiers seized the city of Mukden (now Shenyang) in Manchuria, claiming that Chinese troops had attacked Japanese railway lines in the region. As a result of this invasion, a Japanese-controlled puppet state was established in Manchuria, which was known as Manchukuo and led by the last Qing emperor, Puyi. The invasion of Manchuria was the initial step in Japan's expansionist policy in East Asia and ultimately resulted in its participation in World War II.
In 1980, when Milton Friedman visited Hong Kong, it was still a _____ colony
In 1980, when Milton Friedman visited Hong Kong, it was still a British colony.
To provide some context, Hong Kong was acquired by the British Empire after the First Opium War (1839-1842) and became a Crown colony. The territory was initially composed of Hong Kong Island and, later on, expanded to include the Kowloon Peninsula and the New Territories.
As a British colony, Hong Kong experienced significant economic growth and development, which was of great interest to Milton Friedman, a renowned economist and advocate of free-market capitalism. During his visit, he observed the territory's free trade policies, minimal government intervention, and low taxes, which he believed contributed to its economic success.
Hong Kong's status as a British colony continued until 1997 when it was handed over to China under the "One Country, Two Systems" principle. This principle allowed Hong Kong to maintain its existing political and economic systems, separate from mainland China, for 50 years following the handover.
To know more about Milton Friedman, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30155406#
#SPJ11
8) Two cities in Morocco, Ceuta and Melilla, are controlled by what country?
The two cities of Ceuta and Melilla are controlled by: Spain.
These cities are known as Spanish autonomous cities and are situated on the northern coast of Africa, sharing borders with Morocco. They have a unique geopolitical situation, as they are the only European territories located on the African continent.
Ceuta and Melilla are remnants of Spain's colonial past and have been under Spanish control for centuries. The cities have been contested by both Spain and Morocco for a long time, with Morocco claiming the territories as part of its sovereign lands. However, Spain maintains its control over these enclaves, making them part of its sovereign territory.
Despite their location in Africa, Ceuta and Melilla are governed under the same legal framework as the rest of Spain. They have their own local governments and participate in Spanish general elections. The official currency in both cities is the Euro, and the official language is Spanish.
These cities hold strategic importance due to their location on the Mediterranean coast and their proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar. This makes them valuable to Spain not only from an economic standpoint but also from a military and political perspective.
In conclusion, Ceuta and Melilla, two cities in Morocco, are controlled by Spain. They are unique Spanish autonomous cities located on the African continent, governed under the same legal framework as the rest of Spain, and have strategic importance due to their location.
To know more about Spain, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30390768#
#SPJ11
2) What specific actions did Germany and Japan take that led to World War II? How did the allies—France, Britain and the United States—respond to these actions?
Following Japan's defeat in World War II, the Allies, led by the United States, occupied and rebuilt the Japanese state. From 1945 to 1952, General Douglas A. MacArthur led the United States' occupying forces.
What were Japan's actions during World War II?Guam, Wake Island, and Hong Kong were all taken by the Japanese in December 1941. The Philippines, the Dutch East Indies (Indonesia), Malaya, Singapore, and Burma were also taken by the Japanese in the first half of 1942. Additionally, Japanese soldiers attacked unarmed Thailand and forced its leaders to declare war on the United States and Great Britain.
How did Germany answer when the US pronounced battle on Japan?The day after the assault, Congress proclaimed battle on Supreme Japan with just a solitary disagreeing vote. Japan's allies Germany and Italy responded by declaring war on the United States.
To learn more about war visit :
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ1
Complete question -
What specific actions did Germany and Japan take that led to World War II? How did the allies France, Britain and the United States respond to these actions?
in the ottoman empire, why did reform attempts, such as the tanzimat, ultimately fail to produce revolutionary change? group of answer choices reform relied too much on the personal whim of rulers. merchants refused to lend money to the sultan to finance his reforms. the clergy promoted change, but the military resisted it. land owners could not hire enough labor to grow crops for e[port.
In the Ottoman Empire, the reform attempts such as the Tanzimat ultimately failed to produce revolutionary change primarily because reform relied too much on the personal whim of rulers. The Sultan and his advisors had significant power in shaping reforms, which led to inconsistencies and a lack of long-term vision.
Additionally, the military, which held considerable influence, often resisted changes that threatened their power and status. Merchants' refusal to lend money to the Sultan for financing reforms also contributed to their failure, as the Empire faced financial difficulties and couldn't implement necessary changes.
This lack of funds made it challenging to modernize the empire and implement reforms effectively. Furthermore, the clergy, who were generally supportive of change, encountered opposition from the military, which resisted reforms that could diminish their authority.
This conflict between the clergy and the military hindered the successful implementation of reforms. Lastly, landowners faced difficulties in hiring enough labor to grow crops for export, limiting the economic benefits of the Tanzimat. As a result, the reforms could not significantly impact the Ottoman Empire's economy, further hindering revolutionary change.
In summary, the failure of the Tanzimat reforms in the Ottoman Empire can be attributed to reliance on the personal whim of rulers, insufficient financial support, resistance from the military, and difficulties faced by landowners in hiring labor for agricultural production.
To know more about Ottoman Empire refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17850038#
#SPJ11
I would really appreciate help with this question it is a long essay question.
Question
Some historians have argued that Protestant evangelical movements played a critical role in shaping politics and society in the early United States. Corroborate, qualify, or modify this interpretation, providing specific evidence to justify your answer.
Steps
1:State a relevant thesis that directly addresses all parts of the question.
2:Support your argument with 3 pieces of evidence, using specific examples.
3:Apply historical thinking skills as directed by the question.
4:Synthesize the elements above into an essay that extends your argument, connects it to a different historical context, or connects it to a different category of analysis.
Thesis: Protestant evangelical movements indeed played a critical role in shaping politics and society in the early United States, especially during the Great Awakening. However, their impact was limited to certain regions and social classes, and their influence was not always beneficial.
What impact did Protestant evangelical movements make?The Great Awakening, a series of religious revivals that occurred in the mid-18th century, had a significant impact on American society and politics.
Evangelical preachers such as George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards visited the colonies preaching messages of salvation and personal conversion.
The movement was most successful in the Middle Colonies and New England. In the southern colonies, where Anglicanism predominated, the Great Awakening had little influence.
learn more about Protestant evangelical movements: https://brainly.com/question/4848234
#SPJ1
) As a result of a 1979 Soviet invasion, what country generated one of the world's largest refugee migrations?
As a result of the 1979 Soviet invasion, Afghanistan generated one of the world's largest refugee migrations.
The invasion led to a prolonged conflict, known as the Soviet-Afghan War, which lasted until 1989. The Soviet Union aimed to support the newly-established communist government in Afghanistan and suppress the opposition formed by the Afghan mujahideen.
The war caused immense suffering for the Afghan population, leading to a massive exodus of refugees. It is estimated that over 6 million Afghans fled the country during the conflict, primarily to neighboring countries like Pakistan and Iran. This mass migration had significant social, economic, and political repercussions for both Afghanistan and the host countries.
The refugee crisis brought global attention to the plight of the Afghan people, prompting the international community to intervene and provide humanitarian assistance. While many Afghan refugees eventually returned to their homeland after the Soviet withdrawal in 1989, the long-lasting impact of the war continued to affect the country and its displaced citizens.
In conclusion, the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan led to one of the largest refugee migrations in history. The ensuing conflict forced millions of Afghans to flee their homes, seeking refuge in neighboring countries and resulting in major challenges for both the refugees and their host nations.
For more about Soviet invasion:
https://brainly.com/question/461364
#SPJ11
The huge economy of which country was at the heart of early modern global commerce?
The huge economy of China was at the heart of early modern global commerce.
During the Ming and Qing dynasties (1368-1912), China was the world's largest economy and a major center of global trade. Chinese goods, such as silk, tea, and porcelain, were in high demand in Europe and other parts of the world, and Chinese merchants played a key role in the trade networks that connected China with other parts of Asia, as well as with Europe and the Americas.
China's trade networks extended to Southeast Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, and Europe, with Chinese merchants and traders playing a key role in the early modern world economy. Chinese economic dominance declined in the 19th century due to factors such as internal conflict, foreign imperialism, and technological stagnation.
To know more about global commerce:
https://brainly.com/question/30685901
#SPJ4
8. What invading people conquered much of the territory of the Byzantines?
One of the most notable invading people who conquered much of the territory of the Byzantines were the Ottoman Turks. The Ottomans gradually expanded their power over the centuries, starting in the late 13th century with the conquest of the Balkans and continuing with the capture of Constantinople in 1453.
Under the rule of Mehmed II, the Ottomans defeated the Byzantine Empire and established their own empire, which lasted for more than six centuries. The Ottomans expanded their territory to include much of southeastern Europe, western Asia, and northern Africa, becoming one of the most powerful empires in the world at their height.
The conquest of the Byzantine Empire marked a significant turning point in the history of the region and had lasting impacts on political, cultural, and religious developments in the Mediterranean world.
To know more about Ottomans,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/17850038#
#SPJ11
How many Jews came under Nazi control with the invasion of Poland and annexation of Austria and Czechoslovakia?
275,000
564,000
1.2 million
2.3 million
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C) 1.2 million.
With the invasion of Poland in September 1939 and the subsequent annexation of Austria and Czechoslovakia, approximately 1.2 million Jews came under Nazi control. This number includes about 300,000 Jews in Austria and Czechoslovakia, and about 900,000 Jews in Poland. Many of these Jews were later sent to ghettos and concentration camps, where they were subjected to forced labor, starvation, disease, and mass murder as part of the Nazi regime's genocidal policies.
According to historical records, about 300,000 Jews lived in Austria and Czechoslovakia before their annexation by Nazi Germany in March 1938 and March 1939, respectively. Following the invasion of Poland in September 1939, approximately 3 million Jews were living in Poland, of whom about 900,000 were under Nazi control. This brings the total number of Jews under Nazi control after the annexation of Austria and Czechoslovakia to around 1.2 million.
What was the main reason the Japanese attacked the United States naval base in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii?
To claim the islands as part of the expanding Japanese Empire
To get revenge for the American forced opening of Japan in 1853
To discourage American retaliation for Japanese seizure of the Philippines for oil
To help their allies Germany and Italy by distracting the Americans from Europe
Answer: C, To discourage American retaliation for Japanese seizure of the Philippines for oil
Explanation: Japanese seizure of the Philippines for oil
Answer:
C. To discourage American retaliation for Japanese seizure of the Philippines for oil
What would the US gian control of int he next 20 years after the Spanish American War?
Answer:
In Next 20 years we would also get Samoa (1899) and VA Islands (1917-Purchased from Denmark for $25 million
Explanation:
Palette of King Narmer Pre-dynastic Egypt. c. 3000-2920 B.C.E GreywackeEgyptian archelogical find, dating from about the 31st century B.C, containing some of the earliest hieroglyphic inscription ever found.
The Palette of King Narmer is a significant artifact from ancient Egypt that dates back to the Pre-dynastic period, around 3000-2920 B.C.E.
King Narmer's Palette is a significant artefact for colorful reasons. For starters, it's one of the oldest cases of Egyptian relief form, and it's famed for its attention to detail and creative quality. The palette is also notable for its literal significance, since it's said to reflect pivotal events connected to Upper and Lower Egypt's union, which was a momentous achievement in the region's early history.
The palette is resolve into two halves, each having their own set of filmland and symbols. The obverse side depicts King Narmer wearing the Upper Egyptian crown, clinging a mace in one hand and grabbing an adversary's hair in the other.
Learn more about palette of king at
https://brainly.com/question/28266507
#SPJ4
King Menkaura and Queen display all of the following themes EXCEPT:
a. The stability and power of the Pharaoh
b. The utilization of a queen-mother
c. Propaganda for the Pharaoh during his rule
d. The protection of the Pharaoh in the afterlife
The King Menkaura and Queen display all of the following themes, including the stability and power of the Pharaoh, the utilization of a queen-mother and propaganda for the Pharaoh during his rule. Therefore the correct option is option A, B, C, D.
The statue of King Menkaura and Queen depicts the pharaoh and his queen in a pose that symbolizes their power and authority. The presence of the queen-mother in the statue emphasizes the importance of the queen-mother's role in Egyptian society.
The statue also serves as propaganda for the Pharaoh as it emphasizes his wealth, power, and divine status.
Finally, the statue was created to provide protection for the pharaoh in the afterlife, as it was believed that statues such as this one could serve as a vessel for the ka, or life force, of the pharaoh after his death. Therefore the correct option is option A, B, C.
For such more question on propaganda:
https://brainly.com/question/12802274
#SPJ11
