The three statements that represent a long-term impact of the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta are:
a) People around Atlanta began to move back into the city.
b) Billions of dollars in city and state revenue were generated.
d) Tens of thousands of new hotel rooms were built throughout the state.
First, the 1996 Summer Olympics sparked a renewed interest in living in Atlanta, as people began to move back into the city. The event led to improved infrastructure, public spaces, and amenities, making the city more attractive to potential residents.
Second, the Olympic Games generated significant revenue for both the city and the state. This economic boost came from various sources, such as ticket sales, merchandise, and tourism, and contributed to the overall growth of the region.
Finally, the need to accommodate the influx of visitors during the Games led to the construction of tens of thousands of new hotel rooms throughout the state. This increase in accommodations not only benefited the Olympic Games but also had a long-term impact on the tourism industry in Georgia.
In summary, the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta had several long-term impacts on the city and the state of Georgia, including the revitalization of the city, generating substantial revenue, and increasing accommodations for future visitors.
To know more about the 1996 summer Olympic Games in Atlanta refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/26677918#
#SPJ11
To what extent (HOW MUCH) do you think the New Deal affected the lives of ordinary citizens? Was the “New Deal” effective for everyone? Why or why not?
RIDD
Support was given to farmers, the jobless, kids, and the elderly. The New Deal attempted to revive the economy after prices had fallen sharply and also featured new rules and safeguards for the banking industry.
What effects did the New Deal have on ordinary people's daily lives?10% of the population did not have a job by 1942. The legalization of employees' rights to form unions had an influence on workers' compensation, the expansion of union membership, and the implementation of a federal minimum wage. In addition to helping mothers with small children, the Social Security system was created to offer elderly pensions.
The "New Deal" has advantages for everyone, right? what manner?They were able to get jobs as a result. It promoted capitalism. As a consequence, the American people's optimism was revived and the country's economic system's credibility was restored. Money, however, did not fair as well.
The "New Deal" under Roosevelt put an end to the Great Depression. Millions of employees have been able to keep their jobs on a variety of public projects around the country thanks to several social and governmental spending programs.
Learn more about The New Deal: https://brainly.com/question/815650
#SPJ1
(25 POINTS!!!) A) Choose two examples from the following areas and explain how they are evidence of globalization. Provide an example from each category.
International trade organizations
Immigration
New technologies
B) Explain one major positive effect and one negative effect of globalization on the United States.
pls do both parts! i'd do it on my own but i don't have the book :(
A) International trade organizations, immigration, and new technologies are evidence of globalization. B) One major positive effect of globalization on the United States is access to a wider range of goods and services at lower prices, while a major negative effect has been job loss in certain industries due to outsourcing.
A) International trade organizations: One example of an international trade organization as evidence of globalization is the World Trade Organization (WTO). The WTO was established in 1995 and its main objective is to promote and regulate international trade.
Its membership includes over 160 countries, which shows the interconnectedness of economies across the world. The WTO provides a forum for negotiations and dispute resolution on international trade issues, which helps to facilitate and promote globalization.
Immigration: Immigration is another example of evidence of globalization. People are increasingly moving across national borders for work, study, and to be with family. Immigration has increased due to globalization, as transportation and communication have made it easier for people to travel and stay in touch with their home countries.
For example, the United States is a melting pot of different cultures, and the diversity of the population is evidence of globalization.
New technologies: New technologies, such as the internet, smartphones, and social media, have made the world more connected and have facilitated globalization. These technologies have made it easier to communicate and do business across national borders.
For example, online shopping allows consumers to buy products from anywhere in the world, and social media allows people to connect and share information with others from different countries.
B) Positive effect: One major positive effect of globalization on the United States is increased economic growth. Globalization has allowed U.S. companies to expand their markets and sell their products and services to consumers in other countries.
This has led to increased exports and job growth in the U.S. Globalization has also attracted foreign investment to the U.S., which has created jobs and stimulated economic growth.
Negative effect: One major negative effect of globalization on the United States is job loss due to outsourcing. Globalization has made it easier for companies to move jobs to countries where labour is cheaper, which has led to job losses in the U.S.
This has had a negative impact on some communities and has contributed to income inequality. Additionally, globalization has led to the decline of some industries in the U.S., such as manufacturing, as production has shifted to countries with lower labour costs.
To know more about globalization refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031#
#SPJ11
Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence about the origins of the Bill of Rights.
The ? idea that government should protect human rights influenced the US Bill of Rights.
The ? was the first document to limit a king’s power and give people a say in government.
The Bill of Rights comprise the first ? amendments to the US Constitution.
The United States Constitution ratified the Bill of Rights in 1791, a compilation of amendments intended to limit the government’s authority and ensure fundamental personal freedoms for all Americans.
As early as the notion of natural rights, it was assumed that protection of human liberties such as free speech, religion, and legal procedure were imperative federal obligations.
Read more on Bill of rights here:https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
Answer:
Enlightenment, Magna Carta, and 10.
Explanation:
How did the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt as president, and World War I, highlight similar civil rights issues?
O They revealed a need for the protection of voting rights.
O They revealed injustices against LGBTQ+ people.
They showed the importance of Indigenous self-determination.
They showed that people with disabilities have a role in society.
Answer:
One of the most dynamic political careers of any Hoosier belonged to Governor Paul V. McNutt. He set his sights on the U.S. presidency as early as the 1920s, when he was the state and national commander of the American Legion. His advocacy of human rights, particularly for the Jewish people during his time as Governor and High Commissioner to the Philippines, put his moral arc far beyond some of his peers. In the 1940 presidential election, McNutt was also considered a Democratic “Dark Horse” candidate before Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to run for an unprecedented third term. McNutt’s progressive, internationalist political identity squared well with the New Deal Era and growing American involvement in World War II. While his chance to become president never materialized, McNutt’s decades of public service revealed a man dedicated to democracy and humanitarianism.
Explanation:
Heat and pressure drive water out of the rock.
[ Choose ]
Magma rises towards the surface.
First
The tectonic plate subducts.
[ Choose ]
The water lowers the melting temperature of the mantle.
[ Choose ]
Volcanoes form on the plate that does not subduct.
[ Choose ]
Answer:
First: The tectonic plate subducts.
Choose: Magma rises towards the surface.
Choose: The water lowers the melting temperature of the mantle.
Choose: Volcanoes form on the plate that does not subduct.
When Huey Long preposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as es the Governor of Louisiana a US Senator from Louisiana. The President of the United States. A representat ve in the Louisiana House.
When Huey Long proposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as a US Senator from Louisiana.
When Huey Long proposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as a U.S. Senator from Louisiana. Long was a charismatic and controversial figure who had risen to political prominence as the Governor of Louisiana in the 1920s, where he implemented a range of populist policies that aimed to redistribute wealth and power.
As a U.S. Senator, Long continued to push for radical reforms to address the economic and social inequality that he saw as endemic in American society. The "Share Our Wealth" plan was Long's most ambitious proposal, calling for a progressive tax on income and inheritances, a limit on individual wealth, and a guaranteed income and education for all Americans. Long believed that this plan would stimulate the economy, reduce poverty, and create a more equal society.
Long's proposal was met with both support and opposition. Some saw him as a champion of the people, fighting against the wealthy elite and advocating for the working class. Others saw him as a demagogue and a threat to the established order, whose radical policies could lead to economic collapse and social chaos. Despite this opposition, Long's ideas had a lasting impact on American politics, influencing the New Deal policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and shaping the political discourse of the 1930s and beyond.
To learn more about Share Our Wealth refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30237232
#SPJ11
Why is it important for researchers to study how the black death spread? develop a convincing argument using your own logical reasoning and details from the article.
Studying the spread of the Black Death is important for understanding disease transmission, historical context, and the role of trade in pandemics.
Studying the spread of the Black Death is important for several reasons. First and foremost, it can provide insight into how diseases spread and how they can be contained. The Black Death was one of the deadliest pandemics in human history, and understanding how it spread could help prevent similar outbreaks in the future.
Furthermore, studying the Black Death can also provide historical context and help us understand the social and economic impacts of pandemics. The Black Death had a profound impact on European society, leading to widespread social and economic upheaval. By studying the Black Death, researchers can gain a better understanding of how pandemics can affect society and the economy.
Additionally, studying the Black Death can help us understand the role of trade and transportation in the spread of diseases. The Black Death is believed to have spread through trade routes and transportation networks, and understanding these mechanisms of disease transmission can help us develop more effective strategies for disease prevention and control.
In conclusion, studying the spread of the Black Death is essential for developing a better understanding of how pandemics spread and how they can be contained. It can also provide valuable historical context and help us understand the social and economic impacts of pandemics. Finally, it can shed light on the role of trade and transportation in the spread of diseases and help us develop more effective strategies for disease prevention and control.
To learn more about the Black Death , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17920987
#SPJ11
I GIVE BRAINLIEST PLUS 15 POINTS
Match the following.
1 .
urbanization
devotion to one's country
2 .
nationalism
mass movement to the city
3 .
Prohibition
made sale of liquor illegal
4 .
New Deal
postwar limit in military equipment
5 .
disarmament
set equal trading rights with China
6 .
Open Door Policy
FDR's Depression recovery plan
Match the following.
7 .
League of Nations
Teddy Roosevelt's plan for the fair treatment of the common man
8 .
First Hundred Days
Harding's program for post-war America
9 .
Square Deal
forbade European intervention in the Americas
10 .
normalcy
Wilson's organization for peaceful world settlements
11 .
Monroe Doctrine
FDR's plan to begin immediate positive action
12 .
Fourteen Points
Wilson's peace plan for World War I
Answer:
1. urbanization - mass movement to the city
2. nationalism - devotion to one's country
3. Prohibition - made sale of liquor illegal
4. New Deal - FDR's Depression recovery plan
5. disarmament - postwar limit in military equipment
6. Open Door Policy - set equal trading rights with China
Match the following:
7. League of Nations - Wilson's organization for peaceful world settlements
8. First Hundred Days - FDR's plan to begin immediate positive action
9. Square Deal - Teddy Roosevelt's plan for the fair treatment of the common man
10. normalcy - Harding's program for post-war America
11. Monroe Doctrine - forbade European intervention in the Americas
12. Fourteen Points - Wilson's peace plan for World War I
Explanation:
Please keep your promise with the brainliest 15 points. I took 10-15 minutes to do this. Glad to help.
Give the context
Evaluate the extent to which states strengthened and/or expanded control over colonies in the 1750 to 1900 time period
In the 1750 to 1900 time period, many European states strengthened and expanded their control over their colonies through various means. The extent to which this control was strengthened and expanded varied by region and by time period.
One way that states strengthened their control over colonies was through the implementation of new legal systems and bureaucracies. This was particularly evident in India, where the British East India Company established a system of law and bureaucracy that effectively governed the country.
Similarly, the French established a system of indirect rule in their West African colonies, which allowed them to exert significant control over the region through local intermediaries.
Another way that states expanded their control over colonies was through the use of military force. This was particularly evident in Africa, where European powers engaged in a "scramble for Africa" in the late 19th century. European states such as France, Britain, and Germany used military force to conquer and colonize much of the continent.
Overall, while states did strengthen and expand their control over colonies in the 1750 to 1900 time period, the extent of this control varied by region and by time period. Some states, such as the British in India, were able to establish effective systems of governance and bureaucracy, while others relied on military force to conquer and control their colonies.
To learn more about colonies refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/20147075
#SPJ11
Texas has played an important role in electronics and space technology in the United States. Choose an important innovation that was created in Texas, and describe how our lives are different because of it
In 1958, Jack Kilby of Texas Instruments created the integrated circuit, which revolutionised the electronics industry by allowing for smaller, quicker, and more powerful electronic devices.
The integrated circuit, often known as the microchip, was conceived by Jack Kilby at Texas Instruments in 1958 and is considered a significant discovery. The integrated circuit revolutionised the electronics industry by making it possible to produce smaller, quicker, and more powerful electronic devices.
This breakthrough opened the way for contemporary computers, cell phones, and other electronic gadgets, which are now an indispensable part of our everyday life. Our world would be considerably different without the integrated circuit, and our capacity to communicate and access information would be severely constrained.
Learn more about Jack Kilby:
https://brainly.com/question/30747504
#SPJ4
The Roman Empire was made up of what two types of provinces?
Hadrian and Tetarchy
Tetarchy and Diocletian
Senatorial and Imperial
Diocletian and Imperial
Answer:
Sentorial and imperial
How do you think news of the American revolution affected American colonists ruled by Spain
The American Revolution may have had a direct impact on American colonists ruled by Spain, but it may have indirectly affected the Spanish colonies by changing the balance of power in the region. This may have given Spain an opportunity to expand its own influence in the Americas.
A ducks mass at birth is 0.05 kilograms. the duck gains approximately 0.042 kilograms each week. after how many weeks is the ducks mass 0.890 kilograms?
Answer:
To find out after how many weeks the duck's mass reaches 0.890 kilograms, we can set up an equation and solve for the number of weeks.
Let's assume the number of weeks is represented by "w."
Given:
The initial mass of the duck (at birth) = 0.05 kilograms
Mass gained per week = 0.042 kilograms
The equation can be set up as follows:
0.05 + 0.042w = 0.890
To solve for "w," we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. First, let's subtract 0.05 from both sides:
0.042w = 0.890 - 0.05
0.042w = 0.84
Now, divide both sides of the equation by 0.042:
w = 0.84 / 0.042
w ≈ 20
Therefore, after approximately 20 weeks, the duck's mass will reach 0.890 kilograms.
Which of these resulted from the Supreme Court decision described in the article?
a
Legislative districts were made equal in land size.
b
Votes in urban areas were given more weight than votes in rural areas.
c
Polling places in some areas stayed open later than in other areas.
d
Congressional districts were made similar in population size
Congressional districts were made similar in population size.The Supreme Court decision referred to in the article is the landmark case of Baker v. Carr (1962). The correct answer is d.
This case dealt with the issue of apportionment of state legislative districts and established the principle of "one person, one vote." The Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment required that legislative districts be drawn to ensure that each vote had roughly equal weight, regardless of whether the district was rural or urban.
As a result of this decision, state legislative districts were required to be drawn in a way that ensured equal representation for all citizens, regardless of where they lived. This led to the redrawing of district boundaries in many states to ensure that each district had a similar population size.
This had a significant impact on the distribution of political power and helped to ensure that all citizens had a fair and equal voice in the political process.
The correct answer is d.
To know more about Supreme Court refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
Match these items. 1 . Montevideo Lobos Island 2 . fences fur 3 . nutrias large population concentration 4 . boleadora Plata 5 . resorts coastline 6 . gaucho participant in irregular warfare 7 . Yebra mate cattle bones 8 . guerrilla favorite drink 9 . fur seals cowboy 10 . estuary weapon
These are the references given from the topic of Uruguay and Paraguay in the question.
Lets match them to their meanings-
Lobos Islands - Fur seals.Montevideo - large population concentrationFur - Nutrias Coastline - ResortsPlata - EstuaryParticipant in irregular warfare - GuerrillaCowboy - GauchoFavorite drink - Yerbe mate Cattle bones - FencesWeapon - BoleadoraHence, all the words are matched to their appropriate meanings.
To know more about Island visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22069056
#SPJ1
As governor of georgia, jimmy carter actively supported the republican party
integration
segregation
the republican party
all of lester maddox's policies
As governor of georgia, Jimmy Carter actively supported the republican party segregation.
The correct option is B.
Jimmy Carter was an advocate of racial integration in Georgia and supported the integration of public schools, universities, and other public institutions. He believed that segregation was wrong and wrongfully denied people their civil rights. He actively worked to promote the integration of the Republican Party in Georgia, pushing for stronger representation of African-Americans in the Republican Party and canvassing in African-American communities. Carter also opposed all of Lester Maddox’s policies, which were heavily rooted in segregation.
Carter also pushed for economic reforms that would help alleviate poverty in the state and worked to improve the state’s public education system. He believed that education was the key to success, and worked to make sure that all Georgians had access to quality education regardless of their race.
The correct option is B.
To know more about Jimmy Carter , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23064245
#SPJ4
Which two statements about the us mixed market system are true
The statement about mixed market system are a. The government intervenes only to avoid a financial crisis and c. Consumers and producers are free to buy and sell as they wish.
A mixed market is one in which a free hand is given for the purchasing and selling of things. It is an economic system that combines socialism and capitalism principles. The United States uses a mixed economy, where only public firms are under government supervision and free-market activities are encouraged.
The economic system provides a framework for the transfer of commodities from businesses to society with government intervention. Individual economic freedom is also enabled, but it aims to counteract any unfavorable impacts in order to maintain or improve societal welfare. Three aspects of a market economy that safeguards private property are present in a mixed economy.
Read more about mixed-market on:
https://brainly.com/question/30338653
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Which two statements about the US mixed-market system are true?
a. The government intervenes only to avoid a financial crisis.
b. The market waits for government approval of production decisions.
c. Consumers and producers are free to buy and sell as they wish.
d. Government involvement in economic decisions is limited.
Entrepreneurs are essential to the free enterprise system because they:
O A. Help money flow through the economy by starting new
businesses.
O B. Protect consumers by regulating the economic behavior of
businesses.
O C. Promote innovation by punishing companies that steal intellectual
property.
O D. Maintain economic equality by controlling the prices of consumer
goods.
Answer: A. Help money flow through the economy by starting new businesses.
Explanation: By taking risks and investing capital, entrepreneurs create new jobs and products, which in turn stimulate economic growth and create opportunities for others.
Is Kemp’s speech a trustworthy source about the effects of Reaganomics? Why or why not?
Kemp's speech can be considered a somewhat trustworthy source about the effects of Reaganomics, but it is important to consider potential biases and limitations. As a politician and a key proponent of Reaganomics, Kemp is likely to have a favorable view of the policy and its outcomes.
This could lead to him presenting the positive aspects of the policy while downplaying or ignoring negative consequences.
To assess the trustworthiness of Kemp's speech, it is essential to cross-reference his claims with other sources and evidence. This will help determine if his perspective aligns with a broader consensus among economists and historians.
Additionally, considering the context in which Kemp delivered the speech can provide insights into his motivations and the intended audience.
In summary, Kemp's speech can serve as a source for understanding the effects of Reaganomics, but it should be approached with caution due to potential biases.
A more comprehensive assessment of Reaganomics should involve examining a variety of sources, including academic research and firsthand accounts from diverse perspectives. This will enable a better understanding of the policy's overall impact and its various consequences.
To know more about Reaganomics refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/4404145#
#SPJ11
How is the parliamentary system of government different from the presidential system
The parliamentary system of government and the presidential system are two different forms of democratic government, with distinct structures and powers. Here are some key differences between them:
Executive Power: In a parliamentary system, the executive power is vested in the Prime Minister and the Cabinet, who are members of the parliament. In a presidential system, the executive power is vested in the President who is elected by the people.
Separation of Powers: In a presidential system, there is a clear separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. In a parliamentary system, the executive and legislative branches are often fused, with the parliament having the power to remove the Prime Minister through a vote of no confidence.
Role of the Legislature: In a parliamentary system, the legislature plays a more dominant role, with the Prime Minister and Cabinet being accountable to the parliament. In a presidential system, the President is often more independent from the legislature.
Term of Office: In a parliamentary system, the Prime Minister's term of office depends on the support of the parliament, which can vote to remove him or her at any time. In a presidential system, the President's term of office is fixed, and he or she cannot be removed except through impeachment or resignation.
Electoral System: In a parliamentary system, voters elect members of parliament who then choose the Prime Minister. In a presidential system, voters directly elect the President.
Overall, the main difference between the two systems is that in a parliamentary system, the executive and legislative branches are more closely linked, while in a presidential system they are more separate.
Complete the mathematical sentence by finding the percentage of each item.the first number is done for you.
The value of 20% of 100 is 20.
To find the percentage of each item, divide the item's value by the total value and multiply by 100. For example, if there are three items with values of 20, 30, and 50, the percentage of the first item would be (20/100) x 100 = 20%.
When working with percentages, it's important to remember that the percentage represents a part of a whole.
To find the percentage of each item in a group, we need to determine what percentage of the total value each item represents. This can be done by dividing the item's value by the total value and then multiplying by 100 to convert the decimal to a percentage.
In the example given, we have three items with values of 20, 30, and 50. To find the percentage of the first item, we divide its value by the total value (20 + 30 + 50 = 100) and then multiply by 100. This gives us (20/100) x 100 = 20%.
We can repeat this process for each item to find its percentage of the total value. For the second item, the calculation would be (30/100) x 100 = 30%, and for the third item, it would be (50/100) x 100 = 50%.
By finding the percentage of each item, we can compare their relative importance within the group and identify any trends or patterns in the data. This can be useful in a wide variety of applications, from financial analysis to scientific research.
To know more about percentage click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/16797504#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Complete the mathematical sentence by finding the percentage of each item.the first number is done for you.
1. 20% of 15
= (20/100)*15
=0.2*15
=3
2. 20% of 100 = ?
Consider John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx. If they argued, how would their argument differ (or not) from the arguments of French Revolutionaries (Jacobins, moderates, and the "Conspiracy of Equals" for example) among one another? Are there any insights you can draw from the similarities and differences? What has changed in Europe in this century?
Marx, on the other hand, criticized the Revolution's shortcomings and thought that it did not advance social transformation sufficiently. Without knowing more details about the arguments you're referencing; it is difficult to say how they would differ (or not) from those of French Revolutionaries among themselves. Technological breakthroughs, political events like the creation of the European Union, and social changes like increased diversity and globalisation are a few of these changes.
Globalization is the connecting and integrating of individuals, groups, and governments from all over the world (Commonwealth English; note spelling variants). In the early 20th century, the term "globalization" replaced the earlier French term "mondialisation." It developed its current meaning sometime in the second half of the century, and it first became widely used in the 1990s to describe the unprecedented levels of global connectivity of the post-Cold War world.
Its origins can be traced back to the 18th and 19th centuries thanks to developments in communication and transportation technologies. The expansion of international trade and the exchange of ideologies, worldviews, and cultural traditions are two outcomes of these stronger ties.
Learn more about globalization here:
brainly.com/question/30111559
#SPJ4
Explain the objections conservatives had to Johnson’s expansion of federal government power.
(please provide examples)
Conservatives objected to President Lyndon B. Johnson's expansion of federal government power, particularly through his Great Society programs, which aimed to eliminate poverty and racial inequality.
They argued that these initiatives encroached on states' rights and individual liberties. For example, conservatives opposed the creation of Medicare and Medicaid, believing that healthcare should be managed by the private sector, not the government.
They also criticized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, fearing federal control over local schools would undermine community values. Furthermore, conservatives claimed that the War on Poverty led to dependency on government assistance, discouraging self-sufficiency.
Overall, conservatives viewed Johnson's expansion of federal power as an overreach that threatened both states' rights and individual freedoms.
To know more about Secondary Education Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10031745
#SPJ11
What police system was endorsed by the state about the holy land in 1092 ce
The police system endorsed by the state in the Holy Land in 1092 CE was the medieval feudal system.
In the medieval feudal system, the state granted land to lords who in turn provided military service and protection to the king. The lords governed their territories, ensuring law and order through their knights and vassals.
This system was efficient in maintaining peace and security in the Holy Land, as the lords and knights had a vested interest in protecting their landholdings. The feudal system also helped in consolidating political power, as the king could rely on the loyalty of his nobles in times of war or conflict.
While this system had its flaws, such as potential for abuse by the lords, it played a significant role in organizing the administration and policing of the Holy Land during the 11th century.
To know more about feudal system click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1597635#
#SPJ11
What is the advantage of this story being told by a U.S. reporter from a neutral country, rather than a German or Frenchman?
Help!! Please and Thank Youu!!
The advantage of this story being told by a U.S. reporter from a neutral country, rather than a German or Frenchman, is that it provides a more objective and unbiased perspective on the events being reported. So, the U.S. reporter can perform objective reporting.
Additionally, as a U.S. reporter, they may have a better understanding of the cultural and political context of the events being reported, which could help them provide more insightful and nuanced coverage. They may also have better access to sources and information that could be critical to understanding the situation.
Therefore, having a U.S. reporter from a neutral country provides a unique perspective that is less likely to be influenced by personal biases or cultural norms, which can lead to more objective and accurate reporting.
Learn more about objective reporting, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11405528
#SPJ1
how did immigration impact the North?
Answer: Immigration had a significant impact on the North, particularly during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Millions of people from Europe and other parts of the world migrated to the United States during this time, and many settled in the Northern states.
One of the most significant impacts of immigration was the growth of the Northern population. Immigrants settled in cities such as New York, Boston, Chicago, and Philadelphia, where they often formed ethnic enclaves and brought their own cultures and traditions with them. This led to a diverse and cosmopolitan population, which helped to shape the identity of many Northern cities.
Immigrants also played a crucial role in the Northern economy, particularly in industries such as manufacturing and construction. Many immigrants worked in factories and mills, often in dangerous and difficult conditions, and they helped to fuel the growth of the Northern economy during the Industrial Revolution.
However, immigration was not always welcomed by native-born Americans, and it led to significant social tensions and discrimination against immigrants. Some native-born Americans feared that immigrants would take their jobs, and there were often clashes between different ethnic and racial groups in Northern cities.
Despite these challenges, immigration continued to play a major role in shaping the North, both socially and economically. Today, many Northern cities continue to be home to large immigrant populations, and their contributions to the region's culture and economy are still felt.
Explanation:
contrast the reasons for US involvement in lebanon,grenada,and south africa.
The US intervened in Lebanon to bring about stability, in Grenada to overthrow a Marxist regime, and in South Africa to engage in diplomatic and anti-apartheid activities.
The US invaded Grenada for what reason?The US government justified its invasion of Grenada as a measure to defend its residents, particularly medical students. Action was required, according to Deputy Secretary of State Kenneth W. Dam, to "resolve" what Organization of American States (O.A.S.) Article 28 of its charter calls for.
What two occurrences in Lebanon led to the US pulling out its troops?However, by 1984, President Ronald Reagan had ordered the withdrawal of American Marines from Lebanon due to terrorist attacks, a lack of diplomatic success, and congressional resistance.
To know more about Marxist regime visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27770102
#SPJ1
n this excerpt, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explains his ruling in Schenck v. United States. What argument is Holmes making about personal rights and free speech?
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
–Schenck v. United State
Responses
The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
The constitutional protection of free speech is absolute, and each person has a right to express his or herself however he or she wishes.
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes is making the argument B. The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
What does Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes say ?According to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, safeguarding the freedom of speech is crucial; nonetheless, there are occasional instances wherein individual expression can be deemed unreasonable and prohibited.
The government, in his view, possesses the authority to either curtail or forbid free speech whenever it creates a risk that Congress possesses the right to forestall, which results in acute hazards. This conception implies that while the Constitution defends liberty of speech, it isn't an absolute right and must be counterpoised against other significant concerns such as national security or public safety. Hence, to maintain a well-regulated community, limitations on free speech may become essential.
Find out more on Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes at https://brainly.com/question/13930380
#SPJ1
With their newly acquired right to vote, what were Seattle women able to do?
A.)They voted for prohibition
B.)They voted to recall the mayor of Seattle
C.)They voted for the first woman governor
D.)They voted to legalize the right to carry arms
They voted to recall the mayor of Seattle
Seattle women were able to exercise their newly acquired right to vote by voting to recall the mayor of Seattle. This was part of a movement to bring about political change in the city.
The Seattle women voted to recall the mayor of Seattle in 1913 when they were given voting powers due to the mayor's refusal to enforce the city's new female minimum wage ordinance.
The mayor argued that the minimum wage ordinance was unconstitutional, and he refused to enforce it. This angered many of the citizens of Seattle, especially the women who were the primary beneficiaries of the ordinance.
The recall became a referendum on the mayor's failure to protect the rights of working women and the women of Seattle voted to recall him.
To know more about Voting:
https://brainly.com/question/9811814
3. Why was Democrat Woodrow Wilson able to win two presidential elections during an era of Republican Party control?
O Expanded voting rights resulted in more Democratic voters.
O The resignation of a Republican President damaged the party.
O Farmers, laborers, businessmen, and freed slaves supported Wilson.
Republican support was divided between two candidates.
There were the multiple reasons why Democrat Woodrow Wilson was able to win two presidential elections during an era of Republican Party control. One reason was the expanded voting rights that resulted in more Democratic voters. So the right option is: O Expanded voting rights resulted in more Democratic voters.
Additionally, the resignation of a Republican President, William Howard Taft, damaged the party's reputation. Wilson was also able to garner support from a diverse group of individuals, including the farmers, laborers, businessmen, and freed slaves.
Lastly, Republican support was divided between the two candidates, which may have contributed to Wilson's victories.
For more questions on: Woodrow Wilson
https://brainly.com/question/30461705
#SPJ11
