Can y’all help me pls

Answer:

2000

Hope this helps :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the exponent of the scientific notation is positive, move the decimal point 3 places to the right.

The standard notation of the expression is 2 x 10³ is 2000.

An expression contains one or more terms with addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

We always combine the like terms in an expression when we simplify.

We also keep all the like terms on one side of the expression if we are dealing with two sides of an expression.

Example:

1 + 3x + 4y = 7 is an expression.

3 + 4 is an expression.

2 x 4 + 6 x 7 – 9 is an expression.

33 + 77 – 88 is an expression.

We have,

2 x 10³

Standard notation means writing an expression without any base and exponents.

Now,

10³ can be written as 1000.

So,

2 x 10³

= 2 x 1000

= 2000

Thus,

The standard notation is 2000.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ2

Answer is : y= -x + 5

Answer:

y=-x+5

Step-by-step explanation:

have a great day :))))

Answer:

46:74

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(-3,10) (0,5) (3,0) (6,-5)

Step-by-step explanation:

x intercept = 3

y intercept =5

If brainiest is earned its greatly appreciated

Answer:

a) 3/3=1

b) 10/10=1

c) 19/19=1

Step-by-step explanation:

yes

a) 1

b) 1

c) 1

3 x 1/3 =

First we should understand that 3 in fraction form is 3/1.

(3 divided by 1 is three)

So we can rewrite this as;

3/1 x 1/3 =

Now just multiply across

3/1 x 1/3 = 3/3 = 1

Repeating this same logic we'll come across the following answers

10 x 1/10 = 10/10 = 1

19 x 1/19 = 19/19 = 1

Hope this helps

Given parameters:

Number of hours worked by Peter = 6.5hrs

Unknown:

Number of hours Joseph can work more than Peter =?

This problem is straight forward, the statement "his friend Joseph can work 1[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

is the solution to the problem.

Joseph can work 1[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] more than Peter.

Overall, Joseph can work;

                  6.5hrs + 1[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]hr   = 8.2hrs

Answer:

Variable

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

32 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

1 lb = 16 ounces

2 lbs = 2 * 16 = 32 ounces

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomoplete. Here is the complete question.

The function T(d)=10d + 20 gives the temperature in deegrees celcius inside the earth as a function if d, the depth in kilometers ,Find the temperature at 5km, 20km and 100km

T(d)=10d + 20

T(5)=10(5) + 20

T(5)=  50+ 20

T(5) = 70

Hence the temperature is 70 when d = 5km

when d = 20km

T(20)=10(20) + 20

T(20)=  200+ 20

T(20) = 220

Hence the temperature is 220 when d = 20km

when T = 100km

T(100)=10(100) + 20

T(100)=  1000+ 20

T(100) = 1020

Hence the temperature is 1020 when d = 100km

The temperatures at 5km, 20km and 100km are; 70°C, 220°C, and 1020°C respectively.

The complete question requires that we find the temperature at 5km, 20km and 100km.

The temperature function is; T(d)=10d + 20

For 5km;

For 20km;

For 100km;

Read more;

https://brainly.com/question/15308045

Answer:

600 × .8 = 480

480 Students

Answer:

in piles of 9,10 &12

Step-by-step explanation:

this is because if you divide 180 by each number there is no remainder hence the green grocer can arrange in any way.

It is possible to arrange the total of mangoes by using 20 piles of 9 mangoes, 18 piles of 10 mangoes, or 15 piles of 12 mangoes.

Division is the process of splitting a number or an amount into equal parts. Division is one of the four basic operations of arithmetic, the ways that numbers are combined to make new numbers. The other operations are addition, subtraction, and multiplication.

The conditions for mangoes to be arranged are that the piles should have either 9, 10 or 12 mangoes and reminders are not allowed. This means you need to fit all the mangoes and no mangoes can be left.

Based on the conditions and the total number of mangoes (180 mangoes), here are the possibilities that you can determine using division:

9 mangoes piles: 180/ 9 = 20 piles (9 x 20 = 180 with no remainders)

10 mangoes piles: 180/10 = 18 piles (10 x 18 = 180 with no remainders)

12 mangoes piles: 180/12 = 15 piles (12 x 15 = 180 with no remainders)

Hence, It is possible to arrange the total of mangoes by using 20 piles of 9 mangoes, 18 piles of 10 mangoes, or 15 piles of 12 mangoes.

Learn more about division in

brainly.com/question/369266

#SPJ2

Answer:

B)1600

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2000

Step-by-step explanation:

41 × 37 = 1517

Approximate 1517

Answer:

your age is 10 and your brothers age is 2 the equation is

Step-by-step explanation:

a=5b=b+9

the first part is how old you are the second is how old your brother is and the third is how old your sister

Answer:

f(x)

=(x-4)[6(x^2)+23x+20]

=(x-4)(2x+5)(3x+4)

x=4,-2/5,-3/4

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  21–24 and 28 are correctly marked

  25: NEI; 26: ASA or LA; 27: SSS

Step-by-step explanation:

25: At least one side is required for showing congruence. In figure 25, only angles are shown congruent, so there is not enough information.

__

26: Two angles and the side between them are marked congruent. These triangles can be declared congruent by ASA. Considering they are right triangles, one could also invoke LA as the appropriate theorem.

__

27: The unmarked sides of the two outside triangles can be shown to be congruent by virtue of the fact they are opposite congruent angles in the middle triangle. Hence all three sides can be shown congruent for those outside triangles, and the SSS postulate can be invoked.

Answer:

70

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so first of all you have to see if the next number is 5 you can borrow and then draw on number line between 65 and 70 that there is your answer 70

Answer:

yaa , when X=15, y = 3;

here the value of X is five times the value of y

so when X= 10

then. y =X/5 = 10/5= 2

so the value of y will be 2

hope you like the answer

Answer:

3x - 5 = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

91?

Step-by-step explanation:

You don't have any pictures attached or anything so I don't get a full understanding of what you are trying to say, anyways Have a good day! :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, they are. The like term is the variable x. The combine to form 0

Answer:

x =-5±  2i sqrt(14)

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2 + 10x= -81

Take the coefficient of x and divide by 2

10/2 = 5

Square it

5^2 =25

add to each side

x^2 + 10x+25 = -81+25

( x+5) ^2 = -56

Take the square root of each side

sqrt(( x+5) ^2) =± sqrt(-56)

x+5 = ± sqrt(-1) sqrt(4*14)

x+5 =± i sqrt(4)sqrt(14)

x+5 =± i 2 sqrt(14)

Subtract 5 from each side

x+5-5 =-5± i 2 sqrt(14)

x =-5±  2i sqrt(14)

Answer:

h

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

(7x)^2 - 2×7x×1 +1^2 =0

(7x-1)^2 =0

7x-1=0

7x=1

x= 1\7

Answer:

no clue

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

When the null hypothesis is rejected

The  conclusion is that there is enough evidence to support the claim of the researcher

When a type I error occurs

The consequences is that the conclusion that there is enough evidence to support the claim of the researcher is actually incorrect

When a type II error occurs  

 The consequences is  that the conclusion that there is enough evidence  to support the claim of the researcher is actually correct        

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The cost of electricity per month is [tex]\mu = \$104[/tex]

The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : \mu = \$104[/tex]

The  alternative hypothesis is   [tex]H_o :  \mu  >   \$104[/tex]

Generally if the null hypothesis is rejected then the conclusion would be that there is enough evidence to support the claim of the researcher

Generally a Type I error is a an error that occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected

So in the case of this question the consequence of making this type of error is that the conclusion that there is enough evidence to support the claim of the researcher is actually incorrect

 Generally a Type II  error is an error that occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly not rejected

So in the case of this question the consequence of making this type of  

error is that the conclusion that there is enough evidence to support the claim of the researcher is actually correct

Answer:

12/60 but you want the simplified which is 1/5 or 20%