Answer:
To tell the truth i really dont know but you a smart and can figure it out yo own self.
Explanation:
After how many years does a Utah driver's license expire?
Answer: typically 5
Explanation:
Question 15 (True/False Worth 2 points)
(LC)One must pass the bar exam in order to become a paralegal.
True
False
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU
If your the suspect and you know you was caught doing something but you know that Law Enforcement really don't have enough evidence to convict you would you take it to trial or take the plea deal.
Answer:
After you have waived your rights, the confession must still be a voluntary confession. Whether a confession is voluntary or not is based on the “totality of the circumstances”. The Courts have held that a police officer simply lying does not result in an “involuntary confession”.
Explanation:
take a plea deal
Explanation:
because the law enforcement don't have enough evidence
just need the writing doesn’t have to be that long +100 points and brainless
Answer:
to read karlo
Explanation:
need to writing
If police discretion can be abused, what do you think would happen if the police arrested every person they are legally authorized to do so?
Answer:
Law would become corrupt and justice would no longer prevail across the world.
Explanation:
what are the techniques, processes and styles used by the iconic artists in Renaissance and baroque period?
Answer:
Explanation:
There were three painting techniques during the Renaissance: fresco, tempera, and oils. In all of these techniques, colour was an important part of the painter's artAnswer:
whats the real answer i need plsss answer me im from usa
Explanation:
Reconstruction of the crime is done
O at the crime scene as soon as possible
O by all the first responders
O using only physical evidence
O using the collected facts and suggestions coming from work done both at the scene and in the lab
Glenn believe that there is too much noise at night in his neighborhood.He likes to see stricter laws passed to prohibit loud music or shouting in the streets after 11:00pm what is his citizen responsibility in these circumstances
Glen's citizenship responsibility in these circumstances is to contact his representative in local government. Option (C) is correct.
What do you mean by Citizenship?A person's right to dwell in a state and that state's ability to refuse entry or deport them depends on their citizenship status.
Citizenship denotes a position of freedom with related duties. Aliens and other noncitizens living in a country are not granted or are only partially granted certain rights, obligations, and responsibilities that citizens are.
In order to empower people to take charge of their own lives and communities, citizenship education entails the development of knowledge, skills, and confidence.
Therefore, Option (C) is correct. contact his representative in local government.
Learn more about Citizenship, here;
https://brainly.com/question/18099945
#SPJ2
Your question is incomplete, most probably the complete question is;
Glenn believes that there is too much noise at night in his neighborhood. He would like to see stricter laws passed to prohibit loud music or shouting in the street after 11:00 p.m. What is his citizenship responsibility in these circumstances?
A. to write a letter to his U.S. Senator
B. to start a public protest against street noise
C. to contact his representative in local government
D. to contact the Governor of Florida with his complaint
what are Dalit&what do they do
Dalits are untouchables. they mostly work as labourers
Lindsey lived in a public housing project. The Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door, giving her notice that she was being legally evicted. The Housing Authority appeared in court on the appointed day, but Lindsey did not. The court granted the Housing Authority’s request for eviction because Lindsey did not appear in court as per her notice. When Lindsey’s time to appeal expired, she was evicted from her home. Lindsey claimed that she never received the Housing Authority’s notice. The Housing Authority relied on a state law that allowed it to give legal notice by tacking a notice of eviction to the occupant’s door. Lindsey filed a lawsuit against the Housing Authority alleging that her constitutional rights to due process were violated by the law. Were they? Explain your answer. [Greene v. Lindsey, 456 U.S. 444 (1982)]
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because the Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door. That means she has to receive it. If they send it through the mail, it'll make sense that she hasn't received the letter because it could be lost in the other mail, but the Housing Authority put it on the door which means she did see it, but she just ignored it. She knows that she was supposed to come to court on time and on the correct date. It's like if she's turning in homework late in #oogle Classroom while ignoring the due date and time. To be honest, I think that maybe the Housing Authority should of give her at least two or three warnings, but Lindsey did actually see the letter.
Brainlist pls!
similarities between nazism fascism and totalitarianism (not less than 3)
tabulate three roles each of men and women and evaluate whether they have changed over time
Explanation:
gifucufufufufyztsudud
Which of the following is a key element in the criminal act of arson?
A. The intent to do harm or defraud
B. Physical harm done to others
C. The location on the private property of another party
D. Business property destroyed
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. The intent to do harm or defraud
standard used determine whether an expert's scientific testimony is admissible
Answer:
aaaaaaaaa
Explanation:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Explanation:
mj ii Erik ekeieieo3eoo3o3oekrlorororororo
How do Australia acknowledge Indigenous rights?
Answer:
nss não entendo ND do q falando
Please answer it's due today!!
1. What were the forensic evidence that points to O.J. Simpson ?
2. What were some of the behaviour by Simpdon after the murder that may infer guilt ?
3. How did past relationship with his spouse that led to his suspicion?
4. What was the defense theory of the case ?
5. How did the defense create reasonable doubt ?
6. IN your opinion was the verdict correct ?
Answer: i have attached a screenshot of what i said and answerd it was not letting me post it so here you go
In the SCP Foundation. What is code Black and what is it's purpose?
Answer and Explanation:
You mean the videogame, Well Code Black Lockdown is called when there has been a breach and control of a site has been lost, it specifically allows the use warheads or hydro bombs.
Answer:
The Foundation often referred to as The SCP Foundation, is a secret organization dedicated to the security and safety of the world by securing and containing anomalous and hostile artifacts and entities among many things, referred to as SCPs.
Why do you think some neighborhoods are more crime ridden than others? Do you think it is the people living there or something about the neighborhood? Why?
Answer:
Answer down below.
Explanation:
Yes, some neighborhoods can be more crime ridden, BUT, that does not mean that its only them. Crime can happen anywhere, and it doesn't have to be one specific place. Its not really about the people IN the neighborhood, but its with the people OUTSIDE. They come in and see there is something going on, and they go ahead and join. Not saying that all the people are innocent, but a vast majority are at times.
Why do we have to follow the law?
When does a human right become a legal right?
when the human right have inspired states to enshrine such standards into national constitutions and other legislation
In no fewer than 100-words, explain why a retired civilian police officer would make an excellent civilian military police officer.
Answer: It's mundane for police officers to retire while they are plausibly young, which gives them a unique chance to dedicate several years to an incipient vocation. A retired civilian police officer would make a great civilian military police officer due to their antecedent experience. Not only are they used to the environment they are going to go in kenning and probably having done a lot more than your average civilian. They may additionally make more pay than they would at a mundane department due to this, it could be optically discerned as an extra income for the person after they get out of the department.
Explanation: boss baby approved
A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would
most likely agree with which statement?
The Supreme Court's most important role is to ensure that
Congress does not enact policies that discriminate against
people.
B. The Supreme Court should use its power to interpret U.S. laws to
better protect citizens from injustice and unfairness.
O C. The Supreme Court should issue only majority opinions and do
away with dissenting and concurring,opinions.
D. The Supreme Court's rulings should reflect the exact text of the
Constitution rather than justices own beliefs.
A Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree with this statement: D. The Supreme Court's rulings should reflect the exact text of the Constitution rather than justices own beliefs.
Supreme Court is a federal court and it's known to be the highest court based on the hierarchy of courts in the judicial branch. Thus, Supreme Court is referred to as the ap-ex court.
Generally, the Supreme Court comprises nine (9) justices:
A chief justice.Eight (8) associate justices.Judicial restraint can be defined as a procedural or substantive approach to judicial interpretation and review which asserts that judges should hesitate in the exercise of their own power to strike down laws unless they are unconstitutional and illegitimate. Thus, a Supreme Court justice is expected to make decisions strictly based on the constitution or a landmark case.
In conclusion, a Supreme Court justice who believes strongly in judicial restraint would most likely agree that, the rulings of the Supreme Court's should always reflect the exact text of the Constitution rather than their own beliefs.
Read more: https://brainly.com/question/10946441
Which type of government provides the best protection of individual rights?
A. Absolute Monarchy
B. Parliamentary Democracy
C. Dictatorship
D. Oligarchy
Who was the first law given to? *
-The Egyptians
-The Hebrews
-The Greeks
-The Romans
Quickly please I’m in a testtt
Answer:
The content of the instructions and its interpretations, the Oral Torah, was passed down orally, excerpted and codified in Rabbinical Judaism, and in the Talmud were numbered as the 613 commandments. The Law given to Moses at Sinai (Hebrew Halakhah le-Moshe mi-Sinai הלכה למשה מסיני) is a halakhic distinction.
Explanation:
so i guess the hebrews
what are Dalit&what do they do
Answer:
Dalit dalita meaning "broken/scattered", Hindi: romanized: dalit, same meaning) is a name for people belonging to the lowest caste in India, characterised as "untouchable".[1] Dalits were excluded from the four-fold varna system of Hinduism and were seen as forming a fifth varna, also known by the name of Panchama. Dalits now profess various religious beliefs, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Christianity, Islam and various other belief systems.
Explanation:
correct me if im wrong
Answer:
Untouchable, also called Dalit, officially Scheduled Caste, formerly Harijan, in traditional Indian society, the former name for any member of a wide range of low-caste Hindu groups and any person outside the caste system.
Dalits in India continue to work as sanitation workers: manual scavengers, cleaners of drains, garbage collectors, and sweepers of roads.
Edge-law enforcement
For which reason do corrections facilities pursue accreditation? (Select all that apply.)
-to protect themselves from lawsuits
-to comply with the law
-to comply with national standards
-to demonstrate to the public that the facility is operating under rule of law
to protect themselves from lawsuits
Martina is arrested for a crime and refuses to take the witness stand at his or her trial.
Which amendment(s) does this law involve?
Is this law constitutional? In other words, does this law violate the amendment? If so, it is unconstitutional. If not, it is constitutional.
Why or why not? Be sure to cite textual evidence from the amendment.
Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
Why do you think the police are straddled with the responsibility of dealing with individuals with mental health, or substance abuse issues?
Answer:
The large numbers of people with mental illness in jails and prisons has fueled policy concern in all domains of the justice system. This includes police practice, where initial decisions to involve persons in the justice system or divert them to mental health services are made. One approach to focus police response in these situations is the implementation of Crisis Intervention Teams (CIT). The CIT model is being implemented widely, with over 400 programs currently operating. While the limited evidence on CIT effectiveness is promising, research on CIT is limited in scope and conceptualization-much of it focusing on officer characteristics and training. In this paper we review the literature on CIT and present a conceptual model of police response to persons with mental illness that accounts for officer, organizational, mental health system and community level factors likely to influence implementation and effectiveness of CIT and other approaches. By moving our conceptualizations and research in this area to new levels of specificity, we may contribute more to effectiveness research on these interventions.
Explanation:
hope it helps you my friend
Which of these is a disadvantage of living under an authoritarian government?
A. A lack of individual freedoms
B. A slow legislative process
C. A weak executive branch
D. A lack of national laws
Answer:im pretty sure is c
Explanation:
A weak executive branch is a disadvantage of living under an authoritarian government. Hence, option C is correct.
What is executive branch?The executive branch is made up of the President, his or her advisors, and several departments and organizations. This branch's responsibility includes enforcing the law.
To implement and uphold the laws established by Congress, the President appoints the heads of all federal agencies, including the Cabinet. Being a part of the Executive Branch, the Vice President is equipped to assume the presidency in an emergency.
The Executive Branch is under the supervision of the President of the United States, who also serves as head of state and military commander-in-chief.
Thus, option C, A weak executive branch, is correct.
For more details about executive branch, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18052177
#SPJ2
PLEASE HELP ASAP!
What percentage of local police departments had equipped their patrol cars with computers by the end of 2002?
Answer:
rom 2000 to 2003 the percent of local police officers employed by a department with infield computer access to vehicle records increased from 67% to 78%.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
