CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME ILL GIVE BRAINLIST












Mai and Elena are shopping


for back-to-school clothes. They found a skirt that originally cost $30


on a 15% off sale rack. Today, the store is offering an additional 15% off. To find the new price of


the skirt, in dollars, Mai says they need to calculate 30. 0. 85 0. 85. Elena says they can just


multiply 30. 0. 70.


1. How much will the skirt cost using Mai's method?


2. How much will the skirt cost using Elena's method?


3. Explain why the expressions used by Mai and Elena give different prices for the skirt. Which


method is correct?

Answer:

option c

Step-by-step explanation:

n²-1/2

pls mrk me brainliest (⁠≧⁠(⁠ｴ⁠)⁠≦⁠ ⁠)

If 13 matches are played in total then, 7 2-player matches and 6 6-player matches are played.

Here we see that the table has two columns- 6 player Athletes and 2 player athletes. It is given that no athlete participates in both the type of games. Hence we can say that

If one match for 2 player game is held then 2 players are employed there.

Hence we have 48 players left

hence we will have 48/6 = 8 6-player matches.

Similarly, if 1 6-player match is played then 44 players applied for the 2-player match, hence, we have 44/2 = 22 2-player matches

If 4 2-player matches are held then we will have 8 players booked. Hence 42/6 = 7 6-player matches were held.

If 4 6-player matches were held then, we have 26/2 = 13 2-player matches.

Hence the table will be

Number of 6 Player Games                       Number of 2-player games

                     8                                                                 1

                     1                                                                 22

                     7                                                                 4

                     4                                                                 13

b)

Let the total 2-player games played be x and 6-player games be y

we have,

x + y = 13

2x + 6y = 50

or, 2(x + y) + 4y = 50

or, 26 + 4y = 50

or, 4y = 24

or, y = 6

Hence x = 7

Therefore, in total 7 2-player matches and 6 6-player matches are played.

To learn more about Equations visit

https://brainly.com/question/22591166

#SPJ4

The location of the point P that is 2/5 of the way from A to B on the directed line segment AB is A(x, y) = (- 8, -2) and B(x, y) = (6, 19) is P(x, y) = (- 12/5, 32/5).

A line segment is generated from two distinct points set on a plane,  The location of the point P within the line segment can be found by means of the following vectoral formula below:

P(x, y) = A(x, y) + k · [B(x, y) - A(x, y)], 0 < k < 1     (1)

Where:

A(x, y) = Initial point

B(x, y) =  Final point

k =  Distance factor

We have that A(x, y) = (- 8, - 2), B(x, y) = (6, 19) and k = 2/5, then the location of the point P is:

P(x, y) = (- 8, -2)  + (2/5) · [(6, 19) - (- 8, -2)]

P(x, y) = (- 8, -2) + (2/5) · (14, 21)

P(x, y) = (- 12/5, 32/5)

In conclusion, the location of the point P that is 2/5 of the way from A to B on the directed line segment AB is A(x, y) = (- 8, -2) and B(x, y) = (6, 19) is P(x, y) = (- 12/5, 32/5).

Learn more about  line segments at:

brainly.com/question/25727583

#SPJ1

#complete question:

Find the point P that is 2/5 of the way from A to B on the directed line segment AB if A (-8, -2) and B (6, 19).

question 8.

It is expected to see precipitation on approximately 1.15 days in any given week in Raleigh, NC based on the data from January 1, 2022, to March 26, 2022.

question 9.

The probability that exactly 90 of the plants will successfully grow is approximately 0.0860.

Option  A is correct.

0(6/13) + 1(4/13) + 2(0) + 3(2/13) + 4(0) + 5(1/13) + 6(0) + 7(0) = 1.1538

binomial distribution with n = 100 (the number of trials) and

p = 0.87 (the probability of success on each trial).

we use the binomial probability formula to find the probability that exactly 90 plants will grow,

P(X = 90) = (100 choose 90) * (0.87)^90 * (0.13)^10

P(X = 90)  =  0.0860.

learn  more about binomial distribution at: https://brainly.com/question/29163389

#SPJ1

The expression g - 68 shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left after eating 68 out of g.

To find out how many gumdrops Hanson has left after eating 68 out of g, we need to subtract 68 from g. Therefore, the expression that shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left is:

g - 68

This expression represents the remaining gumdrops after Hanson has eaten 68 out of g. For example, if Hanson had 100 gumdrops before eating 68 of them, then the expression would be:

100 - 68 = 32

Therefore, Hanson would have 32 gumdrops left after eating 68 out of 100.

In summary, the expression g - 68 shows how many gumdrops Hanson has left after eating 68 out of g. The value of g represents the total number of gumdrops Hanson had before eating 68.

To know more about expression, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29696241#

#SPJ11

The interest is $2,659.23 and the total value is  $8,959.23.

What is compound interest?

The interest that is calculated using both the principal and the interest that has accrued during the previous period is called compound interest. It differs from simple interest in that the principal is not taken into account when determining the interest for the subsequent period with simple interest.

Here the given principal P = $6300

Number of years = 8

Rate of interest = 4.5% = 4.5/100 = 0.045

Now using compound interest formula then,

=> Amount = [tex]P(1+r)^{t}[/tex]

=> Amount = 6300[tex](1+0.045)^8[/tex]

=> Amount = [tex]6300(1.045)^8[/tex]

=> Amount = $8,959.23

Then Interest = Amount - Principal

=> Interest = $8,959.23 - $6300 = $2,659.23.

Hence the interest is $2,659.23 and the total value is  $8,959.23.

To learn more about compound interest refer the below link

https://brainly.com/question/28020457

#SPJ4

The 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation is (0.199, 0.509).

To find the 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation, we will use the chi-square distribution. We know that for a sample size of n=25, the degrees of freedom for the chi-square distribution is (n-1) = 24.

The chi-square distribution is a right-tailed distribution, so we need to find the chi-square values that will leave 4% in the right tail (for a total of 92% confidence interval).

From a chi-square distribution table, the chi-square value with 24 degrees of freedom that leaves 4% in the right tail is 41.337. The chi-square value that leaves 96% in the left tail is 13.119.

Using the formula for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation:

lower bound = [tex]sqrt((n-1)*s^2 / chi-square upper)[/tex]

upper bound = [tex]sqrt((n-1)*s^2 / chi-square lower)[/tex]

We can substitute the values we have:

lower bound = [tex]sqrt((25-1)*0.34^2 / 41.337) = 0.199[/tex]

upper bound = [tex]sqrt((25-1)*0.34^2 / 13.119) = 0.509[/tex]

Therefore, the 92% confidence interval for the population standard deviation is (0.199, 0.509).

Learn more about confidence interval,

https://brainly.com/question/17097944

#SPJ11

Answer: Let's use the Pythagorean theorem to solve this problem.

Let x be the common factor of the ratio 3:4, so the sides of the rectangle are 3x and 4x.

The Pythagorean theorem states that for any right triangle, the sum of the squares of the two shorter sides is equal to the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the longest side).

So, for the rectangle with sides 3x and 4x, we have:

(3x)^2 + (4x)^2 = (diagonal)^2

9x^2 + 16x^2 = 100

25x^2 = 100

x^2 = 4

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

x = 2

Therefore, the sides of the rectangle are:

3x = 3(2) = 6 cm

4x = 4(2) = 8 cm

So, the length and width of the rectangle are 6 cm and 8 cm, respectively.

The equation of the tangent plane to the surface z = ln(x - y) at the point (3, 2, 0) is x - y - z + 1 = 0.

To find the tangent plane to the surface z = ln(x - y) at the point (3, 2, 0), we can use the following steps

Find the partial derivatives of the surface with respect to x and y:

∂z/∂x = 1/(x - y)

∂z/∂y = -1/(x - y)

Evaluate these partial derivatives at the point (3, 2):

∂z/∂x (3, 2) = 1/(3 - 2) = 1

∂z/∂y (3, 2) = -1/(3 - 2) = -1

Use these values to find the equation of the tangent plane at the point (3, 2, 0):

z - f(3,2) = ∂z/∂x (3,2) (x - 3) + ∂z/∂y (3,2) (y - 2)

where f(x,y) = ln(x - y)

Plugging in the values we get:

z - 0 = 1(x - 3) - 1(y - 2)

Simplifying the equation, we get:

x - y - z + 1 = 0

For similar question on tangent plane:

https://brainly.com/question/30260323

#SPJ11

The equation that has given solutions x = -5 and x = 2 is [tex]x^2 + 3x - 10 = 0.[/tex]

If the given solutions of an equation are x = -5 and x = 2, then the equation can be written as a product of two linear factors, (x + 5) and (x - 2), because when either of these factors is equal to zero, the corresponding solution is obtained.

So, the equation is:

(x + 5)(x - 2) = 0

Expanding the product, we get:

[tex]x^2 + 3x - 10 = 0[/tex]

To know more about equation, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30877461#

#SPJ11

To find the vector equation of the plane containing the two intersecting lines, we can first find the normal vector of the plane by taking the cross product of the direction vectors of the two lines. The normal vector will be orthogonal to both direction vectors and thus will be parallel to the plane.

Direction vector of the first line: (2, 4, 3)

Direction vector of the second line: (-1, -1, 3)

Taking the cross product of these two vectors, we get:

(2, 4, 3) x (-1, -1, 3) = (9, -3, -6)

This vector is orthogonal to both direction vectors and thus is parallel to the plane. To find the vector equation of the plane, we can use the point-normal form of the equation, which is:

N · (r - P) = 0

where N is the normal vector, r is a point on the plane, and P is a known point on the plane. We can choose either of the two given points on the intersecting lines as the point P.

Let's use the point (4, 7, 3) on the first line as the point P. Then the vector equation of the plane is:

(9, -3, -6) · (r - (4, 7, 3)) = 0

Expanding and simplifying, we get:

9(x - 4) - 3(y - 7) - 6(z - 3) = 0

Simplifying further, we get:

9x - 3y - 6z = 0

Dividing by 3, we get:

3x - y - 2z = 0

Therefore, the vector equation of the plane containing the two intersecting lines is:

(3, -1, -2) · (r - (4, 7, 3)) = 0

or equivalently,

3x - y - 2z = 0.

If AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF, then triangle ABC is similar to triangle DEF.

To determine the scale factor of a dilation, you need to compare the corresponding lengths of the pre-image and image of a figure. The scale factor is the ratio of the lengths of any two corresponding sides.

For example, suppose you have a triangle ABC with sides AB = 3 cm, BC = 4 cm, and AC = 5 cm. If you dilate the triangle by a scale factor of 2, you get a new triangle A'B'C'.

To find the length of A'B', you multiply the length of AB by the scale factor: A'B' = 2 * AB = 2 * 3 = 6 cm. Similarly, B'C' = 2 * BC = 2 * 4 = 8 cm and A'C' = 2 * AC = 2 * 5 = 10 cm. Therefore, the scale factor of the dilation is 2.

To determine if polygons are similar, you need to check if their corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportional.

In other words, if you can transform one polygon into another by a combination of translations, rotations, reflections, and dilations, then they are similar.

For example, suppose you have two triangles ABC and DEF.

If angle A is congruent to angle D, angle B is congruent to angle E, and angle C is congruent to angle F, and the ratios of the lengths of the corresponding sides are equal, then the triangles are similar. That is, if AB/DE = BC/EF = AC/DF, then triangle ABC is similar to triangle DEF.

To know more about triangles refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

The exponential decay function to model this situation where t represents the number of years since 2007 and y is the amount of people is y = 19265 * (1 - 0.015)^t. The population for 2031 will be approximately 14,814 people.

To write an exponential decay function for this situation, you can use the formula:

y = P * (1 - r)^t

where y is the population at time t, P is the initial population, r is the annual decrease rate, and t represents the number of years since 2007.

In this case, P = 19265, r = 0.015 (1.5% expressed as a decimal), and t represents the number of years since 2007.

So, the exponential decay function is:

y = 19265 * (1 - 0.015)^t

To estimate the population for 2031, find the difference in years between 2031 and 2007 (2031 - 2007 = 24 years), and plug it into the formula as t:

y = 19265 * (1 - 0.015)^24

y ≈ 14814

So, the estimated population in 2031 will be approximately 14,814 people, rounded to the nearest person.

Learn more about exponential decay function here: https://brainly.com/question/27822382

#SPJ11

Using the quotient rule of logarithms, we have:

=log2 51.2 − log2 1.6

= [tex]log2 (51.2/1.6)[/tex]

Simplifying the numerator, we have:

[tex]log2(51.2/1.6) = log2(32)[/tex]

Using the fact that 32 = 2^5, we have:

log2 32 = log2 2^5 = 5

log2 51.2 − log2 1.6 = log2 (51.2/1.6) = log2 32 = 5

To know more about logarithm refer here

https://brainly.com/question/47152560#

#SPJ11

The vector s obtained from the top SVD represents the difficulty scores for each item in the dataset, which can be used to rate or rank them accordingly.

Based on the theory of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), we can decompose matrix G into a sum of rank-many rank-one matrices. If G is approximated by a rank-one matrix sq^T, where s ∈ R^n and q ∈ R^m have non-negative components, we can use this fact to compute a difficulty score or rating.

The vector s can be interpreted as the difficulty score vector for each item, where its components represent the difficulty levels of individual items in the dataset. By using the top singular value decomposition, we can extract the most significant singular values and corresponding singular vectors to approximate G. The higher the value in the s vector, the higher the difficulty level of the corresponding item.

More on SVD: https://brainly.com/question/13144048

#SPJ11

The correct choice is: C. The absolute maximum is at x = 1050, and there is no absolute minimum.

To find the absolute extrema of the function f(x) = -0.002x^2 + 4.2x - 50 over the interval (-∞, ∞), we need to find the critical points and then determine if there's a maximum or minimum at each point.

Step 1: Find the derivative of the function f(x) with respect to x. f'(x) = -0.004x + 4.2

Step 2: Set the derivative equal to zero and solve for x. -0.004x + 4.2 = 0 x = 1050

Step 3: Since we have only one critical point, we need to determine if it's a maximum or a minimum. To do this, we can use the second derivative test.

Step 4: Find the second derivative of the function f(x) with respect to x. f''(x) = -0.004

Step 5: Since the second derivative is negative (f''(x) = -0.004 < 0), the critical point x = 1050 corresponds to an absolute maximum. Step 6: Calculate the value of the function f(x) at x = 1050. f(1050) = -0.002(1050)^2 + 4.2(1050) - 50 = 2150

Thus, the absolute maximum is at x = 1050, and the value is 2150. Since the function is a parabola with the "mouth" facing downwards, there is no absolute minimum.

The correct choice is: C. The absolute maximum is at x = 1050, and there is no absolute minimum.

Learn more about absolute extrema,

https://brainly.com/question/31322200

#SPJ11

The p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.04. This means that if the null hypothesis is true

To find the p-value, we need to conduct a hypothesis test.

The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication:

H0: μd = 0

The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication:

Ha: μd ≠ 0

where μd is the population mean difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication.

We are given that the sample size is n = 36, the sample mean difference is ¯d = 2.4, and the sample standard deviation is s = 4.5.

We can calculate the t-statistic as:

t = (¯d - 0) / (s / sqrt(n)) = (2.4 - 0) / (4.5 / sqrt(36)) = 2.13

Using a t-distribution table with 35 degrees of freedom (df = n - 1), we find that the two-tailed p-value for t = 2.13 is approximately 0.04.

Therefore, the p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.04. This means that if the null hypothesis is true (i.e., if there is really no difference in blood pressure before and after taking the medication), there is a 4% chance of observing a sample mean difference as extreme or more extreme than 2.4. Since this p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence that the drug affects blood pressure.

To know more about p-value, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30078820#

#SPJ11

Using the federal list, the total amount of exemptions that Jerry would be allowed is $29,800.

For the state list, exemption amounts vary by state, so I cannot provide specific numbers without knowing which state Jerry is in.

To determine the total amount of exemptions Jerry would be allowed using the federal list and state list, we first need to examine the value of each asset. Jerry has a house with equity of $15,000, a car with equity of $2,500, household goods worth $6,000, and tools worth $5,800.

Using the federal list, the exemptions include:
1. Homestead exemption: up to $25,150 for the house equity
2. Motor vehicle exemption: up to $4,000 for the car equity
3. Household goods exemption: up to $13,400 (no single item over $625)
4. Tools of the trade exemption: up to $2,525 for tools needed for business

Jerry's federal exemptions would be:
1. $15,000 for the house (within the $25,150 limit)
2. $2,500 for the car (within the $4,000 limit)
3. $6,000 for household goods (within the $13,400 limit)
4. $5,800 for the tools (exceeds the $2,525 limit)

Using the federal list, the total amount of exemptions that Jerry would be allowed is $29,800 (15,000 + 2,500 + 6,000 + 2,525).

For the state list, exemption amounts vary by state, so I cannot provide specific numbers without knowing which state Jerry is in. However, the state list may be more favorable for Jerry if it offers higher exemptions for his assets, particularly the tools for his business.

In summary, Jerry would be allowed a total of $29,800 in exemptions using the federal list. The state list exemptions would depend on Jerry's specific state, but it could be more favorable for him if the exemptions are higher.

To know more about financial bankruptcy:https://brainly.com/question/31040620

#SPJ11

The total amount of exemptions that Jerry would be allowed using the federal list is $13,100.

Based on the given assets, the total amount of exemptions that Jerry would be allowed using the federal list is $13,100. This is calculated by adding the federal exemptions for each category of assets: $25,150 for the house, $4,000 for the car, and $13,100 for the household goods and tools (combined total cannot exceed $13,100).
The state list varies depending on the state where Jerry resides. Without knowing the state, it is impossible to provide an accurate answer. However, it is generally true that the state list can be more favorable for the debtor, as some states have higher exemption amounts or allow for additional exemptions that are not available under federal law. Jerry should consult with a bankruptcy attorney in his state to determine the specific exemptions available to him.

Learn more about "amount":

https://brainly.com/question/25720319

#SPJ11

The correct answer is e. 2/7.

To evaluate this line integral, we need to parameterize the curve given by the parabola y = x from (1, 1) to (-1, 1).

Let's let x = t and y = t, where t goes from 1 to -1. Then we can rewrite the integral as follows:

[tex]\int\ C (x - y)\dx + (y \sin y)\dy[/tex]

[tex]= \int\limits^1_{-1} {[(t - t)dt + (t sin t)}\,dt}[/tex]

[tex]= \int\limits^1_{-1} { (t \sin t)} \, dt[/tex]

We can evaluate this integral using integration by parts:

Let u = t and [tex]dv = sin t\ dt[/tex]. Then [tex]du/dt = 1[/tex] and v = -cos t.

Using the formula for integration by parts, we have:

[tex]\int\limits^1_{-1} { (t \sin t)}\, dt = -t \cos t |_{-1}^{1} + \int\limits^1_{-1} { cos t}\, dt[/tex]

= -cos(-1) + cos(1) + sin(-1) - sin(1)

= 2sin(1) - 2cos(1)

Therefore, the value of the line integral is:

[tex]S_c(x - y)dx + (y \sin y)dy = 2\sin(1) - 2\cos(1)[/tex]

Hence, the correct answer is e. 2/7.

Learn more about line integral

brainly.com/question/30763905

#SPJ11

Using cubes formula the factored expression is given as:

1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)

To factor the expression [tex]1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3[/tex], we can utilize the difference of cubes formula, which states that the difference of two cubes can be factored as the product of their binomial factors.

In our given expression, we have[tex](1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3).[/tex] We can identify[tex]a^3 as (1/2x)^3 and b^3 as (1/3y)^3.[/tex]

Applying the difference of cubes formula, we get:

[tex](1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3) = (1/2x - 1/3y)((1/2x)^2 + (1/2x)(1/3y) + (1/3y)^2)[/tex]

Simplifying the expression within the second set of parentheses, we have:

[tex](1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3) = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)[/tex]

Therefore, the factored form of the expression 1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 is given by (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2). This represents the product of the binomial factors resulting from the application of the difference of cubes formula.

To factor the expression 1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3, we can use the difference of cubes formula, which states that:

       [tex]a^3 - b^3 = (a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2)[/tex]

Applying this formula, we get:

1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)

Therefore, the expression is completely factored as:

[tex]1/8x^3 - 1/27y^3 = (1/2x - 1/3y)(1/4x^2 + 1/6xy + 1/9y^2)[/tex]

To know more about cubes formula refer to

https://brainly.in/question/1853390

#SPJ11

Answer:

To find two numbers that add up to +29 and multiply to +100, you can use algebra. Let's call the two numbers "x" and "y". We know that:

x + y = 29

xy = 100

We can use the first equation to solve for one of the variables in terms of the other. For example, we can solve for "y" in terms of "x" by subtracting "x" from both sides:

y = 29 - x

Now we can substitute this expression for "y" into the second equation:

x(29 - x) = 100

Expanding the left-hand side of the equation gives:

29x - x^2 = 100

Rearranging and simplifying gives a quadratic equation:

x^2 - 29x + 100 = 0

This quadratic can be factored as:

(x - 4)(x - 25) = 0

So the two numbers that add up to +29 and multiply to +100 are +4 and +25.

a. There are 1000 mice in the neighborhood initially.

b.  The population of mice never quadruple

c. After 5 weeks there are 18 mice in the neighborhood.

d. It takes 0 weeks for there to be 1000 mice.

e. The P' (5) is -96.86, indicates that after 5 weeks, the number of mice is declining at a pace of about 96.86 mice per week.

a. The initial number of mice in the neighborhood can be found by evaluating P(0):

P(0) = 2000/(1 + 10⁰/₁₀) = 2000/(1+1) = 1000

b. To find how long it takes for the population of mice to quadruple, we need to solve the equation:

P(t) = 4P(0)

2000/(1 + 10^(t/10)) = 4*1000

1 + 10^(t/10) = 1/4

10^(t/10) = -3/4

This equation has no real solutions, so the population of mice never quadruples.

c. To find how many mice are in the neighborhood after 5 weeks, we simply evaluate P(5):

P(5) = 2000/(1 + 10^(5/10)) = 2000/(1+100) = 18.18 (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, there are approximately 18 mice in the neighborhood after 5 weeks.

d. To find how long it takes until there are 1000 mice, we need to solve the equation:

P(t) = 1000

2000/(1 + 10^(t/10)) = 1000

1 + 10^(t/10) = 2

10^(t/10) = 1

t = 0

Therefore, there are 1000 mice in the neighborhood initially, so it takes 0 weeks for there to be 1000 mice.

e. To find P'(5), we first find the derivative of P(t):

P'(t) = -2000ln(10)/10 * 10^(t/10) / (1 + 10^(t/10))^2

Then we evaluate P'(5):

P'(5) = -2000ln(10)/10 * 10^(1/2) / (1 + 10^(1/2))^2 ≈ -96.86

This means that the population of mice is decreasing at a rate of approximately 96.86 mice per week after 5 weeks.

Learn more about population at https://brainly.com/question/30935473

#SPJ11

The next of the sequence 1, 2, 6, 22 is equal to 86.

First term of the sequence is equal to 1

Second term of the sequence is 2

Which can be written as

1 + 2⁰ = 2

Third term is 6

which can be written as

2 + 2² = 2 + 4

          = 6

Fourth term is 22

which can be written as

6 + 2⁴ = 6 + 16

          = 22

Next term using the above pattern is equal to

Pattern is add the previous term with increment of the even square of 2.

22 + 2⁶ = 22 + 64

            = 86

Therefore, the next term of the given sequence is equal to 86.

learn more about sequence here

brainly.com/question/30837338

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, I answer the question in general according to my knowledge:

What comes next in the sequence: 1, 2, 6, 22, ____ ?

The derivative formula for the function is f'(x) = 4ex(1/x + ln(x)).

To find the derivative of the function f(x) = (4 ln(x))ex, we can use the product rule and the chain rule of differentiation.

Let g(x) = 4 ln(x) and h(x) = ex. Then, we have:

f(x) = g(x)h(x)

Using the product rule, we get:

f'(x) = g'(x)h(x) + g(x)h'(x)

Now, we need to find g'(x) and h'(x):

g'(x) = 4/x (since the derivative of ln(x) with respect to x is 1/x)

h'(x) = ex

Substituting these back into the formula for f'(x), we get:

f'(x) = (4/x)ex + 4 ln(x)ex

Simplifying this expression, we get:

f'(x) = 4ex(1/x + ln(x))

Therefore, the derivative formula for the function f(x) = (4 ln(x))ex is:

f'(x) = 4ex(1/x + ln(x)).

Learn more about chain rule

brainly.com/question/30764359

#SPJ11

673 children, 11 students, and 336 adults attended the movie.

How many children attended the movie?

How many students attended the movie?

How many adults attended the movie?

How to calculate the total ticket sales?

How to use equations to solve a word problem?

How to check if the obtained solution is valid?

Let's begin by defining some variables:

Let C be the number of children attending the movie.

Let S be the number of students attending the movie.

Let A be the number of adults attending the movie.

We know that the theater has a seating capacity of 323, so we can write an equation that relates the number of people attending the movie to the seating capacity:

C + S + A = 323

We also know that the theater charges $5.00 for children, $7.00 for students, and $12.00 for adults, and that there are half as many adults as there are children. Using this information, we can write another equation that relates the total ticket sales to the number of people in each category:

5C + 7S + 12A = 2348

We can use the fact that there are half as many adults as children to express A in terms of C:

A = 0.5C

Substituting this into the first equation, we get:

C + S + 0.5C = 323

Simplifying, we get:

1.5C + S = 323

Now we have two equations with two unknowns (C and S), which we can solve to find the values of these variables:

1.5C + S = 323 (equation 1)

5C + 7S = 2348 (equation 2)

Multiplying equation 1 by 5 and subtracting it from equation 2, we can eliminate S and solve for C:

5(1.5C + S) - 7S = 7.5C + 5S - 7S = 2348 - 5(323) = 1683

2.5C = 1683

C = 673.2

Since C must be a whole number, we can round down to the nearest integer:

C = 673

Now we can use this value of C to find S:

1.5C + S = 323

1.5(673) + S = 323

S = 323 - 1010.5

S = 10.5

Again, since S must be a whole number, we round up to the nearest integer:

S = 11

Finally, we can use the equation A = 0.5C to find A:

A = 0.5C = 0.5(673) = 336.5

Rounding down to the nearest integer, we get:

A = 336

Therefore, the number of children, students, and adults who attended the movie are:

673 children, 11 students, and 336 adults.

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

(4, -13) = (x, y)

y = kx + 7

-13 = k(4) + 7

4k = -13-7

4k = -20

k = -5

The number of miles remaining in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance is 191.1 miles.

To find out how many miles remain in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance after the trip, let's first calculate the total miles he drove:

1. For the 10 days at 8 miles per day: 10 days * 8 miles/day = 80 miles
2. For the 3-day trip, sum up the miles driven each day: 156.1 + 240.8 + 82.0 = 478.9 miles

Now, add the miles from both parts: 80 miles + 478.9 miles = 558.9 miles

Finally, subtract this total from Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance of 750 miles:

750 miles - 558.9 miles = 191.1 miles

After the trip, 191.1 miles remain in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance.

More on allowance: https://brainly.com/question/29496871

#SPJ11

The results suggest that the mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is significantly lower than 21.1 mg, which is the mean for unfiltered king size cigarettes. This indicates that the filters are effective in reducing the tar content of cigarettes.

Null hypothesis: The mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is greater than or equal to 21.1 mg.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean tar content of filtered 100 mm cigarettes is less than 21.1 mg.

The test statistic to use is the t-statistic, since the population standard deviation is not known.

t = (19.8 - 21.1) / (3.21 / sqrt(25)) = -2.03

Using a t-table with degrees of freedom of 24 and a significance level of 0.05, the critical t-value is -1.711. Since our test statistic is less than the critical t-value, we reject the null hypothesis.

The p-value can also be calculated using the t-distribution with degrees of freedom of 24 and the t-statistic of -2.03. The p-value is 0.029, which is less than the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.

To know more about degrees of freedom refer to

https://brainly.com/question/28527491

#SPJ11

Answer:

22(15)(12) + (1/2)(22)(10)(15) = 5,610 cm^2