Borachio eats at the same fast food restaurant every day. Suppose the time X between the moment Borachio enters the restaurant and the moment he is served his food is normally distributed with mean 4.2 minutes and standard deviation 1.3 minutes. Find the probability that when he enters the restaurant today it will be at least 5 minutes until he is served.

Answer:

$70,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Profit = Revenue - Costs

x = 120,000 - 50,000

x = 70,000

Answer:

A. The solutions are [tex]x=3i,\:x=-3i[/tex].

B. The factored form of the quadratic expression [tex]x^2+9=(x-3i)(x+3i)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

A. To find the solutions to the quadratic equation [tex]x^2+9=0[/tex] you must:

[tex]\mathrm{Subtract\:}9\mathrm{\:from\:both\:sides}\\\\x^2+9-9=0-9\\\\\mathrm{Simplify}\\\\x^2=-9\\\\\mathrm{For\:}x^2=f\left(a\right)\mathrm{\:the\:solutions\:are\:}x=\sqrt{f\left(a\right)},\:\:-\sqrt{f\left(a\right)}\\\\x=\sqrt{-9},\:x=-\sqrt{-9}[/tex]

[tex]x=\sqrt{-9} = \sqrt{-1}\sqrt{9}=\sqrt{9}i=3i\\\\x=-\sqrt{-9}=-\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{9}=-\sqrt{9}i=-3i[/tex]

The solutions are:

[tex]x=3i,\:x=-3i[/tex]

B. Two expressions are equivalent to each other if they represent the same value no matter which values we choose for the variables.

To factor [tex]x^2+9[/tex]:

First, multiply the constant in the polynomial by [tex]i^2[/tex] where [tex]i^2[/tex] is equal to -1.

[tex]x^2+9i^2[/tex]

Since both terms are perfect squares, factor using the difference of squares formula

[tex]a^2-i^2=(a+i)(a-i)[/tex]

[tex]x^2+9=x^2+9i^2=\left(-3i+x\right)\left(3i+x\right)[/tex]

Answer:

76

Step-by-step explanation:

The two angles are vertical angles so they are equal

3x+7 = 4x-16

Subtract 3x from each side

3x-3x+7 = 4x-3x-16

7 = x-16

Add 16 to each side

7+16 = x-16+16

23 =x

We want YAX

YAX = 3x+7

3*23+7

69+7

76

Answer:

[tex]271.3 mm^3\\[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to find the volume of the hole and subtract it from the volume of the cylinder.

The volume of a cylinder is given as:

[tex]V = \pi r^2h[/tex]

where r = radius

h = height

A cylindrical metal pipe has a diameter of 8.4 mm and a height of 10 mm.

Its radius is 4.2 mm. Therefore, its volume is:

[tex]V = 3.14 * 4.2^2 * 10 = 553.9 mm^3[/tex]

A hole cut out of the center has a diameter of 6 mm. Its height is also 10 mm.

Its radius is 3 mm. Therefore, its volume is:

[tex]V = 3.14 * 3^2 * 10 = 282.6 mm^3[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of metal in the pipe is:

[tex]553.9 - 282.6 = 271.3 mm^3[/tex]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I assume Josh and Peyton are his friends and both gave him advice on what to do with half of the money from the big lottery win.

Let's say Josh said "save it or invest it for your retirement" and Peyton said "use it to keep playing the lottery.

We will now look at the sense in each piece of advice!

Step-by-step explanation:

JOSH

By investing the $250,000 (half of the money won), Patrick will be sure that the money is available for him anytime and would even have gotten interest, by the time he's ready to use it.

PEYTON

By playing the lottery continuously, Patrick could get lucky once in a while and win big again. How big though?

Analyzing with the figures given,

$20 gets Patrick a lottery ticket.

$250,000 will get him 12,500 lottery tickets!

Whether he's buying the tickets at once or he'll play the lottery once in a while, I'll say he has good chances of winning big again.

So if the probability of winning big after purchasing up to 12,500 tickets is close to 1, Patrick should play the lottery with the $250,000

If the probability of winning big after purchasing 12,500 lottery tickets is close to 0 (closer to 0 than it is to 1) then Patrick should invest the $250,000 in retirement.

Answer:

answer c.

y <= x - 2 and y >= x + 1

Step-by-step explanation:

You wrote the given answers wrong. Here are the right choices that are given as possible solutions:

O y >= x - 2 and y <= x + 1

O y < x - 2 and y > x + 1

O y <= x - 2 and y >= x + 1

O y > x - 2 and y < x + 1

The graph clearly shows two lines and the intended area is shaded and it is clearly including the lines.

Because the lines are included in the solution, by that alone, you can exclude two answers b and d.

Now you still need to decide between the in equalities in answer a and c. Both lines have a gradient of 1, so that does not help to distinguish...

The y intercept of the top line is at y= +1 and the shaded area is bigger then that....

By now it is absolutely clear that answer c must be the right answer and you are done!

EXTRA

Although you have deduced beyond any doubt, that answer c must be the right answer, you still can check your findings 'to be sure' by looking and checking for the bottom line...

BE CAREFUL, ONLY DO THIS IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH TIME. Again, you already know the right answer, and this is "just to confirm", so what is the harm in that?

By double checking yourself, it will sort of "undermine" your appproach. Basically you are doing something which is strictly spoken not nessasary any more. So I urge you to basically step over the urge to check yourself, and stick to your answer.

However, if you can not resit the temptation of checking to see if you actually found the right answer, you could test the y intercept of the bottom line, which is at y= -2 and the shaded area is smalller then that....

So again, it is now confirmed that answer c is indeed the right answer.

The correct system of linear inequalities is represented by the graph are,

⇒ y > x - 2

⇒ y < x + 1

A relation by which we can compare two or more mathematical expression is called an inequality.

Given that;

The system of linear inequalities is shown in graph.

Hence, By graph;

The value of y - intercepts are,

⇒ - 2 and - 1

Hence, The correct system of linear inequalities is represented by the graph are,

⇒ y > x - 2

⇒ y < x + 1

Thus, The correct system of linear inequalities is represented by the graph are,

⇒ y > x - 2

⇒ y < x + 1

Learn more about the inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25944814

#SPJ7

Answer:

[tex] P= 2*Lenght + 2*Width[/tex]

Since the perimeter is 56 inches we can solve for the lenght with this equation:

[tex] 56 in = 2*12in + 2*Length[/tex]

And solving for the length we got:

[tex] Length = \frac{56in -24 in}{2} 16 in[/tex]

So then the lenght = 16 inhes and the width of 12 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

For a rectangle of width 12 inches and lenght y inches we know that the perimeter is given by:

[tex] P= 2*Lenght + 2*Width[/tex]

Since the perimeter is 56 inches we can solve for the lenght with this equation:

[tex] 56 in = 2*12in + 2*Length[/tex]

And solving for the length we got:

[tex] Length = \frac{56in -24 in}{2} 16 in[/tex]

So then the lenght = 16 inhes and the width of 12 inches

Answer:

The 88% confidence interval for the population mean of waiting times is between 7.34 minutes and 22.66 minutes.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the standard deviation for the sample, so we use the t-distribution to solve this question.

The first step to solve this problem is finding how many degrees of freedom, we have. This is the sample size subtracted by 1. So

df = 64 - 1 = 63

88% confidence interval

Now, we have to find a value of T, which is found looking at the t table, with 63 degrees of freedom(y-axis) and a confidence level of [tex]1 - \frac{1 - 0.88}{2} = 0.94[/tex]. So we have T = 1.9153

The margin of error is:

M = T*s = 1.9153*4 = 7.66.

In which s is the standard deviation of the sample.

The lower end of the interval is the sample mean subtracted by M. So it is 15 - 7.66 = 7.34 minutes

The upper end of the interval is the sample mean added to M. So it is 15 + 7.66 = 22.66 minutes.

The 88% confidence interval for the population mean of waiting times is between 7.34 minutes and 22.66 minutes.

Answer:

5x - 4y = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

First find slope

(5- -10)/(8- -4) = 15/12 = 5/4

(y - 5) = 5/4 (x - 8), multiply everything by 4 so you don't have fractions

4y - 20 = 5x - 40

5x - 4y = 20

Answer:

Graph C is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Lola bought X pencils that cost $0.25 and Y erasers that cost $0.50.

Total expenditure is less than $3.

If we represent expense in the equation form then it will be

Expense on pencils + expense on erasers = Total expense which is < 3

0.25X + 0.50Y < 3

Now we divide the inequality by 0.25

X + 2Y < 12

This inequality when graphed, line will be plotted in dots and area below the line will be in the shaded form.

Slope of this line is = (-1/2) {from the standard equation of line y = mx + c)

Now we come to the graphs. Here dotted line graphs are A or C.

We will calculate the slopes of the lines from the graphs A and C to get tha answer.

For Graph A

The end points are (12, 0) and (0, 3)

So slope = (y-y')/(x-x') = (3-0)/(0-12) = -3/12 = -1/4

For Graph C.

End points the line are (0, 6) and (12, 0)

Slope of the line = (0-6)/(12-0) = -6/12 = -1/2

Therefore Graph C is the answer.

Answer:

Graph C is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Lola bought X pencils that cost $0.25 and Y erasers that cost $0.50.

Total expenditure is less than $3.

If we represent expense in the equation form then it will be

Expense on pencils + expense on erasers = Total expense which is < 3

0.25X + 0.50Y < 3

Now we divide the inequality by 0.25

X + 2Y < 12

This inequality when graphed, line will be plotted in dots and area below the line will be in the shaded form.

Slope of this line is = (-1/2) {from the standard equation of line y = mx + c)

Now we come to the graphs. Here dotted line graphs are A or C.

We will calculate the slopes of the lines from the graphs A and C to get tha answer.

For Graph A

The end points are (12, 0) and (0, 3)

So slope = (y-y')/(x-x') = (3-0)/(0-12) = -3/12 = -1/4

For Graph C.

End points the line are (0, 6) and (12, 0)

Slope of the line = (0-6)/(12-0) = -6/12 = -1/2

Therefore Graph C is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

make brainiest please

Answer:

c, Z

Step-by-step explanation:

x+y=4

y+z=5

y=4-x

4-x+z=5

-x+z=1

z=1+x

Answer:

d: please note I am not sure about this but look at my reasoning and maybe you can find your own answer that you are sure about.

D: i am sure about this.

Step-by-step explanation:

From what I looked up, i believe what you are talking about is deductive reasoning, which is based off of facts. It can't be a or b because that wasn't defined in the statement. Squares and rectangles are not the same thing since you can have a square that is a rectangle, but a rectangle that is not a square, so D is correct.

corresponding angles i believe since they are matching

I know that the 2 lines are parallel because 5 and 6 are alternate interior angles since they are on opposite sides.

4 and 6 are not vertical or right angles, so it must be d, also they follow what a corresponding angle is, which is them being matching.

Answer:

13. B

14. D

Step-by-step explanation:

13. Law of Detachment says that if two statements are true then we can derive a third true statement. So, for example, say the first statement is that you are a human. Say the second statement is that you breathe. You can write this as: if you are a human, you breathe. In this case, if you have a square, then you have a rectangle. You have a quadrilateral.

14. 4 and 6 are corresponding angles, since you can tell that there are two parallel lines from angle 5 = angle 6. You can also use angle addition theorem.

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the x intercept set y =0 and solve for x

6x+5y = -30

6x = -30

Divide by 6

x = -30/6 = -5

The x intercept is (-5,0)

To find the y intercept set x =0 and solve for y

6x+5y = -30

5y = -30

Divide by 5

y = -30/5 = -6

The y intercept is (0,-6)

To find the x-intercept set y =0. Solve for x.

6x+5y=-30

6x+5(0)=-30

6x+0=-30

6x=-30

x=-30/6

x=-5

The x-intercept is at (-5, 0)

To find the y-intercept set x =0. Solve for y.

6x+5y=-30

6(0)+5y=-30

0+5y=-30

5y=-30

y=-30/5

y=-6

The y-intercept is at (0, -6)

it is age heart rate and weather

Answer:

y = -2x + 5

slope = -2

y intercept = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope intercept form of equation of line is given by y = mx + c

where m is the slope of line

c is the y intercept i.e point where given line intersect y axis.

________________________________________________

given equation 4x + 2y = 10

we have to re-write this equation in form y = mx + c

4x + 2y = 10

subtraction 4x from LHS and RHS

4x + 2y - 4x= 10 - 4x

2y = 10- 4x

we have to eliminate 2 from y for that we

divide  LHS and RHS by 2 we

2y /2 = 10/2- 4x/2

y = 5 - 2x

rearranging it in y = mx+c form

y = -2x + 5

thus, m = -2 , c = 5

Due to the symmetry of the paraboloid about the z-axis, you can treat this is a surface of revolution. Consider the curve [tex]y=x^2[/tex], with [tex]1\le x\le2[/tex], and revolve it about the y-axis. The area of the resulting surface is then

[tex]\displaystyle2\pi\int_1^2x\sqrt{1+(y')^2}\,\mathrm dx=2\pi\int_1^2x\sqrt{1+4x^2}\,\mathrm dx=\frac{(17^{3/2}-5^{3/2})\pi}6[/tex]

But perhaps you'd like the surface integral treatment. Parameterize the surface by

[tex]\vec s(u,v)=u\cos v\,\vec\imath+u\sin v\,\vec\jmath+u^2\,\vec k[/tex]

with [tex]1\le u\le2[/tex] and [tex]0\le v\le2\pi[/tex], where the third component follows from

[tex]z=x^2+y^2=(u\cos v)^2+(u\sin v)^2=u^2[/tex]

Take the normal vector to the surface to be

[tex]\dfrac{\partial\vec s}{\partial u}\times\dfrac{\partial\vec s}{\partial u}=-2u^2\cos v\,\vec\imath-2u^2\sin v\,\vec\jmath+u\,\vec k[/tex]

The precise order of the partial derivatives doesn't matter, because we're ultimately interested in the magnitude of the cross product:

[tex]\left\|\dfrac{\partial\vec s}{\partial u}\times\dfrac{\partial\vec s}{\partial v}\right\|=u\sqrt{1+4u^2}[/tex]

Then the area of the surface is

[tex]\displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^2\left\|\dfrac{\partial\vec s}{\partial u}\times\dfrac{\partial\vec s}{\partial v}\right\|\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=\int_0^{2\pi}\int_1^2u\sqrt{1+4u^2}\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv[/tex]

which reduces to the integral used in the surface-of-revolution setup.

[tex]the \: answer \: is \: 10 \\ please \: see \: the \: attached \: picture \: for \\ full \: solution \\ hope \: it \: helps[/tex]

Answer:

10 is the answer for this question.

Answer:

508

Step-by-step explanation:

use l x w

40x7

10x18

8x6

508

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

x + 10 = 3(x - 1)² ← expand (x - 1)² using FOIL

x + 10 = 3(x² - 2x + 1) ← distribute

x + 10 = 3x² - 6x + 3 ← subtract x + 10 from both sides

0 = 3x² - 7x - 7 → C

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The associative property lets you move parentheses in a sum or product. That is, it doesn't matter which sum or product you compute first.

The commutative property lets you swap the order of operands in a sum or product.

The identity property says the operation using the identity element gives the original value, unchanged.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The percentage of women meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.99%.

b) The percentage of men meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.95%.

c) The new height requirements are at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

a) To find the percentage of women meeting the height requirement of being between 4ft 9in (57 inches) and 6ft 4in (76 inches), we need to calculate the proportion of women within this range using the normal distribution.

First, we standardize the height requirement using the formula:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the value (height), μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For the lower limit (57 inches):

Z_lower = (57 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ -2.33

For the upper limit (76 inches):

Z_upper = (76 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ 4.70

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the area between -2.33 and 4.70. This represents the percentage of women meeting the height requirement.

The percentage of women meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.99%.

b) Similarly, for men meeting the height requirement of being between 4ft 9in (57 inches) and 6ft 4in (76 inches), we standardize the values:

For the lower limit (57 inches):

Z_lower = (57 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ -3.68

For the upper limit (76 inches):

Z_upper = (76 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ 3.11

Using the standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find the area between -3.68 and 3.11.

The percentage of men meeting the height requirement is approximately 99.95%.

c) To find the new height requirements that exclude the tallest 5% of men and the shortest 5% of women, we need to determine the corresponding Z-scores.

For men:

Z_upper_men = Z(0.95) ≈ 1.645

For women:

Z_lower_women = Z(0.05) ≈ -1.645

Using these Z-scores, we can calculate the new height requirements:

For the new lower limit:

X_lower = Z_lower_women * σ + μ

For the new upper limit:

X_upper = Z_upper_men * σ + μ

Substituting the values:

X_lower = -1.645 * 2.7 + 63.3 ≈ 58.53 inches

X_upper = 1.645 * 2.8 + 67.3 ≈ 71.78 inches

Therefore, the new height requirements are at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

For more such question on percentage visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ8

a) The percentage of women meeting the height requirement is 99.99%.

b) The percentage of men meeting the height requirement is 99.95%.

c) The new height requirements are at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

a) For women meeting the height requirement:

Given: Mean (μ) = 63.3 in.

Standard Deviation (σ) = 2.7 in.

So, Minimum height requirement:

= 4 ft 9 in

= 4 * 12 + 9

= 57 inches

and, Maximum height requirement:

= 6 ft 4 in

= 6 * 12 + 4

= 76 inches

We will calculate the Z-scores for these heights using the formula:

Z = (x - μ) / σ

For the minimum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{min[/tex] = (57 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ -2.33

For the maximum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{max[/tex] = (76 - 63.3) / 2.7 ≈ 4.70

So, the the area between -2.33 and 4.70.

Thus, the percentage is  99.99%.

b) For men meeting the height requirement:

Given: Mean (μ) = 67.3 in., Standard Deviation (σ) = 2.8 in.

Minimum height requirement: 4 ft 9 in = 57 inches

Maximum height requirement: 6 ft 4 in = 76 inches

For the minimum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{min[/tex]= (57 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ -3.68

For the maximum height requirement:

[tex]Z_{max[/tex] = (76 - 67.3) / 2.8 ≈ 3.11

So, the area between -3.68 and 3.11.

Thus, the percentage is 99.95%.

c) For the new height requirements:

For men:

[tex]Z_{upper_{men[/tex] = Z(0.95) ≈ 1.645

For women:

[tex]Z_{lower_{women[/tex] = Z(0.05) ≈ -1.645

For the new lower limit:

[tex]X_{lower} = Z_{lower}_{women} \sigma+ \mu[/tex]

For the new upper limit:

[tex]X_{upper} = Z_{upper}_{men} \sigma+ \mu[/tex]

Substituting the values:

[tex]X_{lower} = -1.645 * 2.7 + 63.3[/tex]

           = 58.53 inches

and, [tex]X_{upper} = 1.645 * 2.8 + 67.3[/tex]

                     = 71.78 inches

Therefore, the new height at least 58.5 inches and at most 71.8 inches.

Learn more about z score here:

https://brainly.com/question/31871890

#SPJ6

Answer:

s = 4.43

Step-by-step explanation:

Using formula for bigger circle

s =r∅

Where s is the Arc length, r is rdius and ∅ is theta(angle)

8.84=5∅

∅= 8.84/5

Angle = 1.77 radians

So both angles equal to 1.77 radians

Now again

Using formula

s = r∅

Where s is the Arc length, r is rdius and ∅ is theta(angle)

s = (2.5)(1.77)

s ≈ 4.43

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval for the difference of means is (7.67, 16.33).

The estimate is Md = 12.

The standard error is sM_d = 2.176.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between means.

The sample 1 (this year's sales), of size n1=36 has a mean of 53 and a standard deviation of 12.

The sample 2 (last year's sales), of size n2=49 has a mean of 41 and a standard deviation of 6.

The difference between sample means is Md=12.

[tex]M_d=M_1-M_2=53-41=12[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{12^2}{36}+\dfrac{6^2}{49}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{4+0.735}=\sqrt{4.735}=2.176[/tex]

The degrees of freedom are:

[tex]df=n_1+n_2-1=36+49-2=83[/tex]

The critical t-value for a 95% confidence interval and 83 degrees of fredom is t=1.989.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

[tex]MOE=t \cdot s_{M_d}=1.989 \cdot 2.176=4.328[/tex]

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

[tex]LL=M_d-t \cdot s_{M_d} = 12-4.328=7.67\\\\UL=M_d+t \cdot s_{M_d} = 12+4.328=16.33[/tex]

The 95% confidence interval for the difference of means is (7.67, 16.33).

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be Option A (67.9%).

Step-by-step explanation:

As we know,

The number of total employees will be:

= 480

The number of employees having normal or low BP will be:

= 96 + 230

= 326

Hence, the percentage of low or normal BP workers will be:

= [tex](\frac{326}{480} )\times 100 \ percent[/tex]

= [tex]67.9 \ percent[/tex]

Note:- % (percent)

Answer:

  19.8 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Angle B is the complement of angle A, so we have this relation for the angles:

  B/A = 3/2 = (90°-A)/A

  2(90° -A) = 3A . . . . . cross multiply

  180° = 5A . . . . . . . . . eliminate parentheses, add 2A

  36° = A . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 5

The relations expressed by the mnemonic SOH CAH TOA remind you that ...

  Cos = Adjacent/Hypotenuse

  cos(A) = AC/AB

  AB = AC/cos(A) = (16 cm)/cos(36°)

  AB ≈ 19.8 cm

Answer:

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders (P-value = 0.004).

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2> 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (single group), of size n1=450 has a proportion of p1=0.1489.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=67/450=0.1489[/tex]

The sample 2 (married group), of size n2=925 has a proportion of p2=0.1005.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=93/925=0.1005[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.0483.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.1489-0.1005=0.0483[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{67.005+93}{450+925}=\dfrac{160}{1375}=0.1164[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.1164*0.8836}{450}+\dfrac{0.1164*0.8836}{925}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.0002+0.0001}=\sqrt{0.0003}=0.0184[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.0483-0}{0.0184}=\dfrac{0.0483}{0.0184}=2.62[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]P-value=P(z>2.62)=0.004[/tex]

As the P-value (0.004) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that rates are higher for single male policyholders verses married male policyholders.

Answer:

[tex] P(t) = A (1+r)^t [/tex]

Where P represent the population after t days. a the initial amount on this case 6 and r the growth factor rate of 0.7781. so then our model would be given by:

[tex] P(t)= 6(1.7781)^t [/tex]

And replacing t=4 we got:

[tex] P(4) = 6(1.7781)^4 =59.975 \approx 60[/tex]

So then after 4 days we would expect about 60 protzoa

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we can use the following function to model the population of protzoa:

[tex] P(t) = A (1+r)^t [/tex]

Where P represent the population after t days. a the initial amount on this case 6 and r the growth factor rate of 0.7781. so then our model would be given by:

[tex] P(t)= 6(1.7781)^t [/tex]

And replacing t=4 we got:

[tex] P(4) = 6(1.7781)^4 =59.975 \approx 60[/tex]

So then after 4 days we would expect about 60 protzoa

Answer:

an example of a literal question is "what size do you wear", "what time does the show start", "who was the protagonist in your story"  etc

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Rs 75,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the total value of property be x

If one-fifth of that is given to son

property with son = 1/5 of total value of property = 1/5 of x = x/5

If one-third of that is given to daughter

property with daughter = 1/3 of total value of property = 1/3 of x = x/3

remaining property after giving the portions to son and daughter

= total value of property - property with son -property with daughter

= x - x/5 - x/3

taking LCM of 5 and 3 (15)

= (15x - 3x - 5x)/15

= 7x/15

Given that remaining property was given to wife

property with wife = 7x/15

it is given that wife got 35000 Rs

thus,

7x/15 = 35,000

7x = 35,000*15 = 525,000

x =  525,000/7 = 75,000

Thus, total worth of property =Rs 75,000 Answer

Answer:

Rs 75,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the total value of property be x

If one-fifth of that is given to son

property with son = 1/5 of total value of property = 1/5 of x = x/5

If one-third of that is given to daughter

property with daughter = 1/3 of total value of property = 1/3 of x = x/3

remaining property after giving the portions to son and daughter

= total value of property - property with son -property with daughter

= x - x/5 - x/3

taking LCM of 5 and 3 (15)

= (15x - 3x - 5x)/15

= 7x/15

Given that remaining property was given to wife

property with wife = 7x/15

it is given that wife got 35000 Rs

thus,

7x/15 = 35,000

7x = 35,000*15 = 525,000

x =  525,000/7 = 75,000

Thus, total worth of property =Rs 75,000 Answer

Answer:

5-i

Step-by-step explanation:

Product=multiplication

Let the complex number=x

(3+2i)*x=17+7i

x=17+7i / 3+2i

x=(17-7i)*(3-2i)/(3+2i)*(3+2i)

=51-34i+21i+14i^2 / 9+6i+6i+4i^2

=51+13i+14i^2 / 9+12i+4i^2

= (51+14 - 13i) / 13

= (65 -13i) / 13

= 65 / 13 - 13 i / 13

= 5 - i.