The given set of questions are solved under the condition of parametric equations x(t)=sin(3t) and y(t)=cos(3t) .
Hence, the length of the curve from t= 0 to t= π is 3π.
Now,
A. To evaluate the velocity, we need to perform the derivative of x(t) and y(t) concerning t.
x'(t) = 3cos(3t)
y'(t) = -3sin(3t)
Therefore, the velocity vector is
v(t) = <3cos(3t), -3sin(3t)>
B. To define the acceleration, we need to evaluate the derivative of v(t) concerning t.
a(t) = v'(t) = <-9sin(3t), -9cos(3t)>
C. To describe the speed, we need to calculate the magnitude of the velocity vector.
|v(t)| = √((3cos(3t))² + (-3sin(3t))²)
= 3
D. In order to find the number of times at which the particle stops, to find when the speed is equal to zero.
|v(t)| = 0 when cos(3t) = 0
sin(3t) = 0.
Therefore,
cos(3t) = 0 when t = (π/6) + (nπ/3),
here n = integer.
sin(3t) = 0 when t = (nπ/3),
here n = integer.
E. To calculate the length of the curve from t=0 to t=π by performing calculus
L = ∫[a,b] √((dx/dt)² + (dy/dt)²) dt
Therefore, a=0 and b=π.
L = ∫[0,π] √((3cos(3t))² + (-3sin(3t))²) dt
= ∫[0,π] 3 dt
= 3π
The given set of questions are solved under the condition of parametric equations x(t)=sin(3t) and y(t)=cos(3t) .
Hence, the length of the curve from t=0 to t=π is 3π.
To learn more about parametric equations,
https://brainly.com/question/30451972
#SPJ4
The complete question is
A particle moves along a path in the xy-plane. the path is given by
the parametric equations x(t)=sin(3t) and y(t)=cos(3t), help with
steps A-E
a. Find the velocity
b. Find the acceleration.
c. Find the speed and simplify your answer completely.
d. Find any times at which the particle stops. Thoroughly explain your answer.
e. Use calculus to find the length of the curve from t=0 to t = π , show your work.
The product of 5 & 10 is equal to a third of a number
Write as an equation and solve.
The equation that represents the statement is
50 = x/3 and x is 150
What is word problem?A word problem in math is a math question written as one sentence or more. This statements are interpreted into mathematical equation or expression.
Word problem are brain teaser that allows people to think properly. The first step is to represent the unknown by a letter.
Representing the number by x
therefore:
The product of 5 and 10 is 5 × 10
5 × 10 = 1/3 × x
50 = x/3
therefore the equation is 50 = x/3 and the value of x is 150.
learn more about word problem from
https://brainly.com/question/21405634
#SPJ1
At midnight, the temperature in a city was 5 degrees celsius. the temperature was dropping at a steady rate of 1 degrees celsius per hour.
a. write an inequality that represents t, the number of hours past midnight, when the temperature was colder than -3 degrees celsius.
b. explain or show your reasoning.
The inequality that represents t, the number of hours past midnight, when the temperature was colder than -3 degrees Celsius is t > 8.
The inequality that represents t, the number of hours past midnight, when the temperature was colder than -3 degrees Celsius is t > 8.When the temperature drops at a steady rate of 1 degree Celsius per hour, it will take 8 hours to reach -3 degrees Celsius from the initial temperature of 5 degrees Celsius.
Therefore, any time past 8 hours after midnight will result in a temperature colder than -3 degrees Celsius.
Thus, the inequality t > 8 represents the number of hours past midnight when the temperature was colder than -3 degrees Celsius.
Learn more about temperature conversions
brainly.com/question/30451535
#SPJ11
A positive integer k is such that k(k + 2013) is a perfect square. Show that k cannot be prime and
find the correct value of k
The only possible value of k is k = 336675.
What is the correct value of K ?Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that k is a prime such that k(k+2013) is a perfect square. Let's denote the perfect square as m^2, where m is a positive integer. Then we can write:
k(k+2013) = m^2
Expanding the left-hand side, we get:
k^2 + 2013k = m^2
Moving all the terms to one side, we get:
k^2 - m^2 + 2013k = 0
Using the difference of squares, we can factor this as:
(k - m)(k + m) + 2013k = 0
Since k is a prime, it must be greater than 1. Thus, k + m and k - m are both integers greater than 1 whose product is divisible by k. This means that at least one of them is divisible by k. Since k is prime, this can only happen if either k + m or km is equal to k. Thus, we have two cases to consider:
Case 1: k + m = k, which implies m = 0. But m is a positive integer, so this is impossible.
Case 2: k - m = k, which implies m = 0. But again, m is a positive integer, so this is impossible.
Therefore, our assumption that k is prime leads to a contradiction, and we conclude that k cannot be prime.
To find the correct value of k, note that k and k+2013 share a common factor of 3. Thus, we can write k = 3n and k+2013 = 3m for some integers n and m. Substituting these expressions into the equation k(k+2013) = m^2 and simplifying, we get:
3n(3n+2013) = m^2
n(3n+2013/3) = m^2/3
n(n+671) = m^2/3
Since n and n+671 are relatively prime, both n and n+671 must be perfect squares. Let's write n = p^2 and n+671 = q^2 for some integers p and q. Then we have:
q^2 - p^2 = 671
Using the difference of squares again, we can factor this as:
(q + p)(q - p) = 671
Since 671 is a prime, its only factors are 1 and 671. Therefore, we have two possibilities:
q + p = 671, q - p = 1, which implies q = 336, p = 335, n = p^2 = 112225, k = 3n = 336675
q + p = 671, q - p = 671, which implies q = 336 + 335 = 671, p = 0, which is not a valid solution since n cannot be negative.
k = 336675. is the best possible answer.
Learn more about Values.
brainly.com/question/13729904
#SPJ11
HELP
The following graph describes function 1, and the equation below it describes function 2. Determine which function has a greater maximum value, and provide the ordered pair.
Function 1
graph of function f of x equals negative x squared plus 8 multiplied by x minus 15
Function 2
f(x) = −x2 + 2x − 15
Function 1 has the larger maximum at (4, 1).
Function 1 has the larger maximum at (1, 4).
Function 2 has the larger maximum at (−14, 1).
Function 2 has the larger maximum at (1, −14).
The correct statement regarding the maximum values of the quadratic functions is given as follows:
Function 1 has the larger maximum at (4, 1).
How to obtain the maximum values?The standard definition of a quadratic function is given as follows:
y = ax² + bx + c.
The x-coordinate of the vertex of a quadratic function is given as follows:
x = -b/2a.
Hence, for each function, the x-coordinate of the vertex is given as follows:
Function 1: x = -8/-2 = 4.Function 2: x = -2/-2 = 1.Each function has a negative leading coefficient, hence the vertex represents a maximum value, and the y-coordinate is given as follows:
Function 1: f(4) = -(4)² + 8(4) - 15 = 1.Function 2: f(1) = -(1)² + 2(1) - 15 = -14.1 > -14, hence the correct statement is given as follows:
Function 1 has the larger maximum at (4, 1).
More can be learned about quadratic functions at https://brainly.com/question/31895757
#SPJ1
Alexandre has two brothers: Hugo and Romain. Every day Romain draws a name out of a hat to randomly select one of the three brothers to wash the dishes. Alexandre suspected that Romain is cheating, so he kept track of the draws, and found that out of
12
1212 draws, Romain didn't get picked even once.
Let's test the hypothesis that each brother has an equal chance of
1
3
3
1
start fraction, 1, divided by, 3, end fraction of getting picked in each draw versus the alternative that Romain's probability is lower.
Assuming the hypothesis is correct, what is the probability of Romain not getting picked even once out of
12
1212 times? Round your answer, if necessary, to the nearest tenth of a percent.
Based on the observed outcome, it is therefore very or highly unlikely that Romain's probability is equal to that of the other brothers, and thus it is possible that Romain is cheating.
What is the probability?Beneath the assumption that each brother has an break even with chance of getting picked in each draw, the likelihood of Romain not getting picked indeed once out of 12 times is:
P(Romain not picked) = (2/3)¹²
= 0.0077
This is one that is less than 1%, which suggests that the observed result is made up of a likelihood less than 1% beneath the given speculation. Therefore, we need to reject the hypothesis that each brother has an equal chance of getting picked in all of the draw.
Learn more about probability from
https://brainly.com/question/24756209
#SPJ1
See text below
Alexandre has two brothers: Hugo and Romain. Every day Romain draws a name out of a hat to randomly select one of the three brothers to wash the dishes. Alexandre suspected that Romain is cheating, so he kept track of the draws, and found that out of 12 draws, Romain didn't get picked even once. 1 Let's test the hypothesis that each brother has an equal chance of of getting picked in each draw versus 3 the alternative that Romain's probability is lower. Assuming the hypothesis is correct, what is the probability of Romain not getting picked even once out of 12 times? Round your answer, if necessary, to the nearest tenth of a percent. Let's agree that if the observed outcome has a probability less than 1% under the tested hypothesis, we will reject the hypothesis. What should we conclude regarding the hypothesis? Choose 1 answer: We cannot reject the hypothesis. B We should reject the hypothesis.
pls solve this asap
Step-by-step explanation:
perimeter of triangle=22 cm
AB+BC+CA=22cm
AB+4+AB =22cm (given,AB=AC)
2AB+4cm=22cm
2AB=22-4cm
2AB=18
AB=18÷2
AB=9cm
Part 3
sales tax is 8%
basketballs are 20% off
you have two customers john and david. john has $250 and
david has $150. john is coaching a baseball team and wants
to buy 10 baseball bats for his team. david wants to buy 3
pairs of running shoes for his kids. will each person be able
to buy the items that they want? explain.
baseball bats are 5% off
running shoes are 15% off
i
tax
with
discount
total
cost
john
david
John will be able to buy the 10 baseball bats for his team with some money left over is -$6.50 and David will be able to buy the 3 pairs of running shoes for his kids with some money left over is $12.30.
Based on the given information, we can calculate the total cost for each customer after factoring in the sales tax and discounts.
For John:
The cost of 10 baseball bats without any discounts or tax would be 10 * $25 = $250.
Since baseball bats are 5% off, John will get a discount of 0.05 * $250 = $12.50.
So, the cost of 10 baseball bats after discount is $250 - $12.50 = $237.50.
Adding 8% sales tax to this amount, the total cost for John will be $237.50 + (0.08 * $237.50) = $256.50.
For David:
The cost of 3 pairs of running shoes without any discounts or tax would be 3 * $50 = $150.
Since running shoes are 15% off, David will get a discount of 0.15 * $150 = $22.50.
So, the cost of 3 pairs of running shoes after discount is $150 - $22.50 = $127.50.
Adding 8% sales tax to this amount, the total cost for David will be $127.50 + (0.08 * $127.50) = $137.70.
Therefore, John will be able to buy the 10 baseball bats for his team with some money left over ($250 - $256.50 = -$6.50) and David will be able to buy the 3 pairs of running shoes for his kids with some money left over ($150 - $137.70 = $12.30).
Learn more about sales tax,
https://brainly.com/question/30109497
#SPJ11
You deposit $2,500 in an investment
account. The rate of growth is 4. 55% a year.
If you make no further deposits or
withdrawals, and the investment is allowed
to grow uninhibited, how long will it take for
your investment to reach $5,000? Round to
the nearest tenth.
It will take approximately 15.27 years for your investment to reach $5,000 at a growth rate of 4.55% per year.
Using the compound interest calculation, we can determine how long it will take for your investment to grow to $5,000 at a growth rate of 4.55% per year:
[tex]A = P(\frac{1 + r}{n} )^(^n^t^)[/tex]
Where:
A = the final amount ($5,000)
P = the initial deposit ($2,500)
r = the interest rate (4.55%)
n = the number of times interest is compounded per year (assuming yearly compounding, n=1)
t = the number of years
Plugging in the values, we get:
[tex]\$5,000 = \$2,500(\frac{1 + 0.0455}{1} )^(^1^t^)[/tex]
Simplifying, we get:
[tex]2 = (1.0455)^t[/tex]
Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:
ln(2) = t ln(1.0455)
Solving for t, we get:
t = ln(2) / ln(1.0455) = 15.27 years
Therefore, it will take approximately 15.27 years for your investment to reach $5,000 at a growth rate of 4.55% per year.
Learn more about interest:
brainly.com/question/19309844
#SPJ4
Victoria has $200 of her birthday gift money saved at home, and the amount is modeled by the function h(x) = 200. She reads about a bank that has savings accounts that accrue interest according to the function s(x) = (1. 05)x−1. Explain how Victoria can combine the two functions to model the total amount of money she will have in her bank account as interest accrues after she deposits her $200. Justify your reasoning.
WILL GIVE BRANLIEST
The total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years can be modeled by the function f(x) = 200 * (1.05)ˣ.
How can we model Victoria's bank account growth over time?To model the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after depositing her $200 and accruing interest over time, we can combine the two functions h(x) and s(x).
We can use the following formula to represent the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years:
f(x) = h(x) + h(x) * s(x)
where h(x) represents the $200 that Victoria has saved at home, and h(x) * s(x) represents the amount of interest accrued on that $200 in x years according to the function s(x).
The justification for this formula is that the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years is the sum of the initial amount of $200 and the interest accrued on that amount over x years.
The interest accrued can be calculated by multiplying the initial amount by the interest rate function s(x).
For example, if Victoria leaves her $200 in the bank for 5 years, the total amount of money she will have in her account can be calculated using the formula:
f(5) = h(5) + h(5) * s(5) = 200 + 200 * (1.05)⁴ ≈ $273.04
Therefore, the total amount of money Victoria will have in her bank account after x years can be modeled using the function f(x) = h(x) + h(x) * s(x).
Learn more about function
brainly.com/question/12431044
#SPJ11
A savings account balance is compounded annually. if the interest rate is 2% per year and the current balance is $1430.00 what will the balance be 8 years from now
Answer:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = the future balance
P = the present balance ($1430.00)
r = the annual interest rate (2% or 0.02)
n = the number of times the interest is compounded per year (since it's compounded annually, n = 1)
t = the number of years (8 years in this case)
Plugging in the values into the formula:
A = 1430(1 + 0.02/1)^(1*8)
Simplifying the equation:
A = 1430(1.02)^8
Using a calculator or performing the calculations manually:
A ≈ 1430(1.171661)
A ≈ 1674.02
the balance after 8 years will be approximately $1674.02.
The equation relates the sound level, , in decibels (dB), of a noise with an intensity of I to the smallest sound intensity that can be heard by the human ear, (approximately watts/meter2).
The maximum intensity of a car horn is approximately 0. 01 watts/meter2. Based on this information, which value is closest to the maximum sound level, in decibels, of a car horn?
.
100 dB
10 dB
1,000 dB
10,000 dB
The equation relates the sound level, in decibels (dB), of a noise with an intensity of I to the smallest sound intensity that can be heard by the human ear, which is approximately 1 x 10^-12 watts/meter2.
Using this equation and the given maximum intensity of a car horn (0.01 watts/meter2), we can find the maximum sound level in decibels:
Sound level = 10 log (0.01/1 x 10^-12)
Sound level = 10 log (1 x 10^10)
Sound level = 100 dB
Therefore, the value that is closest to the maximum sound level in decibels of a car horn is 100 dB.
A cube is a three dimensinal figure with six square faces that are_______. (fill in the blank)
A cube is a three dimensional figure with six square faces that are all congruent, meaning they are identical in shape and size.
Each face of the cube is perpendicular to the adjacent faces, forming right angles where they meet. The cube is a highly symmetrical shape, with all edges and angles equal in length and measure respectively. Its regularity and symmetry make it a popular shape in mathematics and engineering, often used as a model for buildings, containers, and other structures.
The cube's unique properties also make it an ideal shape for games, puzzles, and art, showcasing its versatility and significance in various fields.
To know more about cube refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28134860
#SPJ11
(-2+3)x[4-(-8)] find x
Answer:
x = (-2 + 3) * (4-(-8))
Step-by-step explanation:
what principal will earn $67.14 interest at 6.25% for 82 days?
Answer: attach an image
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the principal, we can use the formula for simple interest:
I = P*r*t
where I is the interest, P is the principal, r is the interest rate, and t is the time in years.
We need to convert 82 days to years by dividing it by 365 (the number of days in a year):
t = 82/365
t = 0.2247
Now we can plug in the values we know and solve for P:
67.14 = P*0.0625*0.2247
P = 67.14/(0.0625*0.2247)
P = 1900
Therefore, the principal is $1900.
What rate of interest compounded annually is required to double an investment in 29 years? Round your answer to two decimal places
An interest rate of approximately 2.40% per annum, compounded annually, is required to double an investment in 29 years.
Let "r" be the annual interest rate, then the investment will double after 29 years if (1 + r)^29 = 2. Solving this equation, we get r ≈ 0.0240 or 2.40% (rounded to two decimal places) as the required annual interest rate. This means that if the investment is compounded annually at this rate, it will double after 29 years.
Alternatively, we can use the formula for compound interest, A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where A is the future value, P is the present value, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.
We want to find the interest rate, r, that will double the investment, so we can set A = 2P, t = 29, n = 1 (compounded annually), and solve for r. This gives us r ≈ 0.0240 or 2.40%.
For more questions like Investment click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
Plsssssssss answer quick need this NOWWW
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A= 1/2 b h b=6 h=2.5
= 7.5
Answer:
7.5 inches squared
Step-by-step explanation:
If only distances are provided, there are two methods to find the area of a triangle. Which method to use depends on which lengths are provided:
Method 1: Base * Height (one leg and the corresponding height)Method 2: Heron's Formula (all three legs are known)Method 1: Base * Height
For any triangle, a line segment from one vertex that terminates perpendicularly to the leg across from it is considered a "height," and the leg that the "height" intersects is "base". If both quantities are known, then the area of the triangle is base times height divided by 2 (sometimes stated as 1/2 times base times height).
In an equation format: [tex]Area_{triangle}=\frac{1}{2}base*height[/tex], often abbreviated as [tex]A_{triangle}=\frac{1}{2}bh[/tex]
For this example, the base at the bottom "6 in" has a corresponding height of "2.5 in", so
[tex]A_{triangle}=\frac{1}{2}(2.5~\text{in})(6~\text{in})[/tex]
[tex]A_{triangle}=7.5\text{ in}^2[/tex]
Method 2: Heron's Formula
If you are not provided any of the heights, but only the three legs of the triangle, Heron's formula provides a method of finding the area of the triangle. It is significantly more complicated, and should only be used if one doesn't have one of the heights given.
Heron's formula gives the area of a triangle using the following formula:[tex]A=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}[/tex] where a, b, and c, are the side lengths of the triangle, and "s" is the "semi-perimeter" (one half of the perimeter) of the triangle: [tex]s=\dfrac{a+b+c}{2}[/tex]
To be consistent, let's let a=3 in, b=5 in, and c=6 in.
Calculating the semi-perimeter of the given triangle first:
[tex]s=\dfrac{a+b+c}{2}=\dfrac{(3~\text{in})+(5~\text{in})+(6~\text{in})}{2}=\dfrac{14~\text{in}}{2}=7~\text{in}[/tex]
Calculating the area:
[tex]A=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}[/tex]
[tex]A=\sqrt{(7~\text{in})((7~\text{in})-(3~\text{in}))((7~\text{in})-(5~\text{in}))((7~\text{in})-(6~\text{in}))}[/tex]
[tex]A=\sqrt{(7~\text{in})(4~\text{in)(2~\text{in})(1~\text{in})}[/tex]
[tex]A=\sqrt{56~\text{in}^4}[/tex]
[tex]A=7.48331477355...~\text{in}^2[/tex]
[tex]A\approx7.5~\text{in}^2[/tex]
Side note: The 2.5 inches that they gave you in the problem isn't exactly 2.5 inches. They rounded to one decimal place there.
A contractor is building a set of stairs out of concrete. Each stair is exactly the same length, width, and height.
(a) Which solid figures can the stairs be broken into? What are the dimensions of each solid figure?
(b) How much concrete will be needed to form the stairs?
The stairs can be broken up into three rectangular prisms
The concrete that will be needed to form the stairs is 9.72 m ^3
How to solve for the amount of concreteTo get the volume of concrete
Since they are 3
2.7 / 3
= 0.9
1.5 / 3
= 0.5
0.5 + 0.5
= 1
each width is 3.6m
The volume of each = 0.9 x 1.5 x 3.6 = 4.86
Volume 2 = 0.9 x 1.0 x 3.6 = 3.24
Volume 3 = 0.9 x 0.5 x 3.6 = 1.62
amount of concrete = 1.62 + 3.24 + 4.86
= 9.72 m ^3
Read more on volume here:https://brainly.com/question/1972490
#SPJ1
Which scatter plot below would best be modeled by using linear regression?
Answer:
Top
Step-by-step explanation:
The closer the data points come to forming a straight line when plotted, the higher the correlation between the two variables, or the stronger the relationship. Therefore, the top option has the most closest lines to a linear function.
(Ex. 1) Y=4x-2
This example shows the corresponding possibilities of a linear regression because of the way the line is represented as graphed, making a straight line as similar to the top option
(Ex. 2) f(x) = x^2-5+15
This example dialates to a similar option like the third option, which isnt linear regression because of it being a quadratic function.
In a nut shell, all data plotted on the graph that are formed closer together and corresponds to a linear equation is a linear regression
The length of human hair is proportional to the number of months it has grown.
a. what is the hair length in centimeters after 6 months? round your answer to the nearest hundredth.
the hair length is about blank
centimeters.
question 2
b. how long does it take hair to grow 8 inches?
it takes blank
months.
question 3
c. use a different method than the one in part (b) to find how long it takes hair to grow 20 inches.
it takes blank
months.
human hair to grow 20 inches, considering the length of hair is proportional to the number of months it has grown.
First, let's establish the proportionality constant, which is the average rate at which human hair grows. On average, human hair grows approximately 0.5 inches per month.
Now, let's find out how many months it takes for hair to grow 20 inches. We can set up a proportion equation as follows:
Length of hair (in inches) / Number of months = Proportionality constant
Let "x" be the number of months it takes for hair to grow 20 inches. We can write the equation as:
20 inches / x months = 0.5 inches/month
To solve for x, we can multiply both sides by x months, which gives us:
20 inches = 0.5 inches/month * x months
Now, we can divide both sides by 0.5 inches/month:
x months = 20 inches / 0.5 inches/month
x months = 40 months
So, it takes 40 months for human hair to grow 20 inches, considering the length of hair is proportional to the number of months it has grown.
To know more about length refer here
https://brainly.com/question/8552546#
#SPJ11
Prove that the triangle FGH is right-angle des at F
The Pythagorean Theorem is used to prove that triangle FGH is a right triangle at angle F.
What are similar triangles?Similar triangles are triangles that share these two features listed as follows:
Congruent angle measures, as both triangles have the same angle measures.Proportional side lengths, which helps us find the missing side lengths.Considering the equivalent side lengths, the proportional relationship for the side lengths in this problem is given as follows:
4/4.8 = FH/3.6 = 5/6.
Hence the length FH is given as follows:
4/4.8 = FH/3.6
FH = 3.6 x 4/4.8
FH = 3.
If the Pythagorean Theorem is respected, the triangle is a right triangle, hence:
3² + 4² = 5²
9 + 16 = 25
25 = 25. -> right trianglge.
More can be learned about similar triangles at brainly.com/question/14285697
#SPJ1
Which equations will find the distance between the lions and giraffes? Select all that apply. 11+16 = c 112+ 162 = c2 c2+ 162 = 112 121+ 256 = c2 11(2)+16(2) = 2c
The equations that will find the distance between the lions and giraffes include the following:
B. 11² + 16² = c².
D. 11(2) + 16(2) = 2.
What is distance?In Mathematics and Science, distance can be defined as the amount of ground that is travelled by a physical object or body over a particular period of time and speed, irrespective of its direction, starting point or ending point.
Mathematically, the distance traveled by both the lions and giraffes when they are positioned one (1) unit apart can be calculated by using this equation:
11² + 16² = c²
Additionally, the distance traveled by both the lions and giraffes when they are positioned two (2) unit apart can be calculated by using this equation:
11(2) + 16(2) = c
Learn more about distance here: brainly.com/question/10545161
#SPJ1
HELP NEEDED ASAP!!!!
The table shows data from a survey about the number of times families eat at restaurants during a week. The families are either from Rome, Italy, or New York, New York:
High Low Q1 Q3 IQR Median Mean σ
Rome 18 1 3 7 4 6.5 6.4 4.3
New York 14 1 4.5 8.5 4 5.5 6.1 3.2
Which of the choices below best describes how to measure the center of these data?
a.Both centers are best described by the mean.
b.Both centers are best described by the median.
c.The Rome data center is best described by the mean. The New York data center is best described by the median.
d.The Rome data center is best described by the median. The New York data center is best described by the mean.
The choice which best describes the measure of center of these data is (d) Rome data center is "best-described" by median and data center of "New-York" is "best-described" by mean.
In the table provided below, we see that the "IQR" for Rome is relatively large compared to the IQR for New York, which suggests that that there may be some skewness in the distribution of the Rome data. So, the median would be a better-measure of center than the mean.
On the other hand, the IQR for "New-York" is relatively small, which indicates that the data is more symmetric and the mean would be a better measure of center.
Therefore, the correct answer is (d).
Learn more about Median here
https://brainly.com/question/27353809
#SPJ1
The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
The table shows data from a survey about the number of times families eat at restaurants during a week. The families are either from Rome, Italy, or New York, New York:
High Low Q1 Q3 IQR Median Mean σ
Rome 18 1 3 7 4 6.5 6.4 4.3
New York 14 1 4.5 8.5 4 5.5 6.1 3.2
Which of the choices below best describes how to measure the center of these data?
(a) Both centers are best described by the mean.
(b) Both centers are best described by the median.
(c) The Rome data center is best described by the mean. The New York data center is best described by the median.
(d) The Rome data center is best described by the median. The New York data center is best described by the mean.
Add. Hint: Use the place value blocks to help solve
8
+
7
8+78, plus, 7. 8
+
7
=
8+7=start color #0c7f99, 8, end color #0c7f99, plus, start color #ca337c, 7, end color #ca337c, equals
The answer of addition is 94.
What is addition?The phrase "the addition" refers to combining two or more numbers. Adding two numbers is indicated by the plus sign (+), therefore adding three is written as three plus three.
To add 8 and 78, we can start by adding the ones place digits, which are 8 and 7.
8 + 7 = 15
Since 15 is greater than 10, we need to regroup 10 ones as 1 ten and carry it over to the tens place. We can represent this with place value blocks by moving a rod of 10 ones from the ones place to the tens place.
So we have:
8
+78
---
```
8
+78
---
16 (write 6 in the ones place and carry 1 to the tens place)
```
Now we can add the tens place digits, which are 1 (carried over) and 8:
1 + 8 = 9
So the final result is:
8
+78
-----
86
Therefore, 8 plus 78, plus 7 is:
```
8
+78
+ 7
---
94
```
So the answer of addition is 94.
Learn more about addition on:
https://brainly.com/question/24247076
#SPJ4
In a study of the relationship between birth order and college success, an investigator found that 126 in a sample of 180 college graduates were firstborn or only children; in a sample of 100 nongraduates of comparable age and socioeconomic background, the number of firstborn or only children was 54. estimate the difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations from which these samples were drawn. give a bound for the error of estimation.
The difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations from which these samples were drawn is 0.16.The bound for the error of estimation is 95% confidence that the true difference in proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations is between 0.058 and 0.262.
To estimate the difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations, we can use the sample proportions and apply the formula:
p1 - p2 = (x1/n1) - (x2/n2)
where p1 and p2 are the true population proportions, x1 and x2 are the numbers of firstborn or only children in the samples, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.
Sample of college graduates: x1 = 126, n1 = 180Sample of non-graduates: x2 = 54, n2 = 100The sample proportions,
p1 = x1/n1 = 0.7
p2 = x2/n2 = 0.54
Substituting these values into the formula,
p1 - p2 = (x1/n1) - (x2/n2) = 0.7 - 0.54 = 0.16
Therefore, we estimate that the difference in the proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations is 0.16.
To find a bound for the error of estimation, we can use the formula:
E = z sqrt(p1*(1-p1)/n1 + p2*(1-p2)/n2)
where E is the margin of error, z is the critical value for the desired level of confidence (we'll use z = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval), and p1 and p2 are the sample proportions.
Substituting the given values, we get:
E = 1.96sqrt(0.7(1-0.7)/180 + 0.54*(1-0.54)/100) ≈ 0.102
Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the true difference in proportions of firstborn or only children for the two populations is between 0.058 and 0.262
To learn more about proportions : https://brainly.com/question/1496357
#SPJ11
evaluate : 20-[5+(9-6]
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
20-(5+(9-6)) = 20-(5+(3)) = 20-(8) = 12.
Alternatively, rewrite the question without parenthesis.
20-(5+(9-6)) = 20-(5+9-6) = 20-5-9+6 = 12.
Zola wrote the area of the rectangle as `2a+3a+4a`.
amir wrote the area as `(2+3+4) a.
explain why they are both correct
please help as quickly as possible
assp
Both Zola and Amir are correct in writing the area of the rectangle. They have simply used different ways of expressing the same value.
Zola and Amir have both written the area of a rectangle using different algebraic expressions.
Zola wrote the area of the rectangle as `2a + 3a + 4a`, which can be simplified using the distributive property of multiplication:
2a + 3a + 4a = (2 + 3 + 4)a
Therefore, Zola's expression simplifies to `(2 + 3 + 4)a`, which is the same as Amir's expression.
Amir wrote the area of the rectangle as `(2 + 3 + 4) a`, which can also be simplified:
(2 + 3 + 4) a = 9a
Therefore, Amir's expression simplifies to `9a`, which is the same as the sum of the terms in Zola's expression.
Therefore, both Zola and Amir are correct in writing the area of the rectangle. They have simply used different ways of expressing the same value.
To know more about area , refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/30307509#
#SPJ11
Given ⊙E with diameter AC, m∠CED=(3x)°, (m∠BEC=3x+2)°, and m∠AEB=(6x+7)°. Find x and mBD⌢
The following is the value of x and mBD: x = 83/6 and mBD⌢ = 83°.
Given circle E (⊙E) with diameter AC, we have the following information:
1. m∠CED = (3x)°
2. m∠BEC = (3x + 2)°
3. m∠AEB = (6x + 7)°
Since AC is the diameter of the circle, the inscribed angle ∠AEB is subtended by the diameter and thus forms a semicircle. In a semicircle, the inscribed angle is always a right angle. Therefore, m∠AEB = 90°. We can now set up the equation:
(6x + 7)° = 90°
Solving for x:
6x = 83
x = 83/6
Now, we need to find the measure of arc BD (mBD⌢). We can do this by finding the measure of angle BEC, as the measure of an inscribed angle is half the measure of its intercepted arc.
m∠BEC = (3x + 2)° = (3(83/6) + 2)° = (83/2)°
Since the measure of an inscribed angle is half the measure of its intercepted arc:
mBD⌢ = 2(m∠BEC) = 2(83/2)° = 83°
So, x = 83/6 and mBD⌢ = 83°.
To learn more about diameter, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/5501950
#SPJ11
This ladder is extended to a length of 18 feet. The bottom of the ladder is 4. 5 feet from the base of the building. What angle does the ladder make with the ground?
The ladder makes an angle of approximately 82 degrees with the ground when it is extended to a length of 18 feet and the bottom of the ladder is 4.5 feet from the base of the building.
To determine the angle that the ladder makes with the ground, we can use trigonometry. Let x be the height of the ladder when it is leaned against the building. Then, using the Pythagorean theorem, we have: [tex]x^{2}[/tex] + [tex]4.5^{2}[/tex] = [tex]18^{2}[/tex]
Solving for x, we get: x = sqrt([tex]18^{2}[/tex] - [tex]4.5^{2}[/tex]), x ≈ 17.29
Therefore, the ladder makes an angle θ with the ground such that: sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = x/18, θ = arcsin(x/18)
Substituting x ≈ 17.29, we get: θ ≈ 81.99 degrees
Therefore, the ladder makes an angle of approximately 82 degrees with the ground when it is extended to a length of 18 feet and the bottom of the ladder is 4.5 feet from the base of the building.
To know more about Pythagorean theorem, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14930619#
#SPJ11
Suppose that scores on a knowledge test are normally distributed with a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 3. 4. Scores on an aptitude test are normally distributed with a mean of 110 and a standard deviation of 6. 8. Boris scored a 55 on the knowledge test and 106 on the aptitude test. Callie scored 67 on the knowledge test and 119 on the aptitude test. (a) Which test did Boris perform better on? Use z-scores to support your answer. (b) Which test did Callie perform better on? Use z-scores to support your answer. (c) Boris also took a logic test. His z-score on that test was -0. 43. Does this change the answer to which test Boris performed better on? Explain your answer using z-scores
(a) Boris performed better on the aptitude test, since its z-score was higher.
(b) Callie performed better on the knowledge test.
(c) The z-score for the aptitude test was still higher than the z-score for the knowledge test, so Boris performed better on the aptitude test.
(a) To determine which test Boris performed better on, we need to compare his z-scores for the knowledge test and the aptitude test.
For the knowledge test, his z-score is calculated as:
z = (55 - 60) / 3 = -1.67
For the aptitude test, his z-score is:
z = (106 - 110) / 6.8 = -0.59
Since the z-score for the aptitude test is higher than the z-score for the knowledge test, Boris performed better on the aptitude test.
(b) To determine which test Callie performed better on, we need to compare her z-scores for the knowledge test and the aptitude test.
For the knowledge test, her z-score is:
z = (67 - 60) / 3 = 2.33
For the aptitude test, her z-score is:
z = (119 - 110) / 6.8 = 1.32
Since the z-score for the knowledge test is higher than the z-score for the aptitude test, Callie performed better on the knowledge test.
(c) Boris' z-score on the logic test (-0.43) is unrelated to his performance on the knowledge and aptitude tests, so it does not change the answer to which test he performed better on. The z-score for the aptitude test was still higher than the z-score for the knowledge test, so Boris performed better on the aptitude test.
To know more about z-score, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15016913#
#SPJ11
Which is the closest to the volume of the solid figure formed from the net?
I'm sorry, but I cannot answer your question without a net or a description of the solid figure. Can you please provide more information or context?
