Answer:
Jet speed = 395
Wind = 7
Explanation:
Let :
Speed of jet = x
Speed of wind = y
Distance = speed * time
With tailwind :
804 = (jet speed + wind speed) * time
804 = (x + y) * 2
804/2 = (x + y) * 2/2
x + y = 402 - - - (1)
Into a headwind :
776 = (jet speed - wind speed) * time
776 = (x - y) * 2
776/2 = (x - y) * 2/2
x - y = 388 - - - (2)
From (1)
x = 402 - y
Put x = 402 - y in (2)
402 - y - y = 388
402 - 2y = 388
-2y = 388 - 402
-2y = - 14
y = 7
x = 402 - y
x = 402 - 7
x = 395
Lawyers act as intermediaries between their clients and:
A.
the courts.
B.
the judge.
C.
the victims.
D.
law enforcement agencies.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
the courts
Explanation:
at a particular crime scene the victims body is on the floor lying in a pool of blood with a knife stuck into the chest. bloody shoe print marks are everywhere. the drapes in the living room are wide open and the door to the bedroom is ajar. a table lamp is lying on the floor at the far end of the bedroom and the window is wide open. a half filled glass of water is it's on the kitchen counter. in the bathroom the tap is still running and the mirror is smashed into pieces. investigators think there is a possibility that an eyewitness was present when the perpetrator killed the victim. which four items at the crime scene are likely to have been disturbed by the eyewitness. justify your answer.
Answer:
If investigators think there is a possibility that an eyewitness was present when the victim was killed, the four items that would likely have been disturbed by the eyewitness would be the bathroom tap (because they may have washed the blood off their hands), the shoeprints (because they would have likely walked around and got blood on their shoe), the half-filled glass of water (because they may have had a drink of water because they were nervous or stressed), and the door to the bedroom being ajar (they would have left through there).
Explanation:
PLATO!
Considering the crime scene, the four items that the possible eyewitness may have disturbed are -
-the exact scene where the shoe prints are found on the pool of blood,
-the bedroom door,
-the table lamp on the floor, and
-the bedroom window wide open.
An area or place where a crime occurs is known as the crime scene. This scene is where investigators first look for clues to determine the cause of death and try to find clues for the suspect.
Disturbance of a crime scene can be anything that destroys, modifies, or alters the way the original crime scene is. From the moment the victim dies and the suspect is nowhere to be seen, that area becomes a primary crime scene and must be undisturbed until the forensic team can get proper and adequate pictures or information or items from it. It is human instinct to try to get away from anything that is harmful to us. Likewise, it will also be the eyewitness's first instinct to try to get away from the scene as fast as possible and far away too. Now, considering the given crime scene described in the question, we can assume that the four items disturbed by the possible eyewitness are as below-(1) The presence of the bloo dy footprints around the dead body shows that the eyewitness may have tried to revive or check whether the person is still alive or not. Or, it may also be that he/she ran over the dead body to escape.
(2) The open bedroom door suggests the person went through there to get away from the scene.
(3) The table lamp on the floor suggests that it may have been knocked off by the eyewitness when trying to escape through the bedroom window.
(4) the open bedroom window suggests the eyewitness escaped through the bedroom and not through the main entrance or back door.
Learn more about crime scenes here:
brainly.com/question/17699399
Briefly explain how class evidence can help in a criminal investigation
Answer:
Evidence is important to show the point and get the answer
Explanation:
which two cases made drug testing illegal in Us high schools
Answer:
weed n pills
Explanation:
all high schooler know bout weed m where to get it from just don't tell
what are ultimate laws?
Answer:
☁️Hı☁️
Final Beneficiaries
Together with the main beneficiary interface structures of the project, the final beneficiaries are the institutions that benefit from these structures.
Final Beneficiaries are those that will benefit from the project in the long term, at large social or sectoral dimensions.
Researchers
Students
Industrial Firms
Technopark Companies (Spin-Offs)
Incubation Companies
Explanation:achievements
Final laws
These include the essence of dark matter and dark energy, the abilities of the hidden symmetries of nature and their mechanisms and ultimately the fundamental nature of the void that gave rise to its early universe.
Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?
es
O Increase in the numbers of Offenders
ons
O Prison Overcrowding
O Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
There was a disconnect between probated offense and those which require imprisonment.
cover
rse
Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent crime.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.
What is the name of the person whom the complaint is filed against
An attorney has a case in Iowa that has a legal issue to be decided. The attorney brings in a case from the neighboring state of Nebraska that was decided by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The judge in the state of Iowa is not REQUIRED to follow that Nebraska case, but can consider it. The case law is referred to as ___________________________________ authority since the Iowa judge may, but does not have to decide the same way as Nebraska.
Answer: Persuasive authority
Explanation:
Persuasive authority is a decision that a court may follow but does not have to. The decision may be from courts with lower, equal, or higher standing with the court it is brought to but from another jurisdiction.
The case in question here will be dealt with according to Iowa state law so bringing a decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court is from another jurisdiction. The Iowa judge can either choose to follow the precedent set by Nebraska or not at their own discretion.
Anka is a correctional officer. After getting to know an inmate wellthe inmate asks Anka to smuggle in some of the inmate's favorite junk food. The inmate offers to pay a large amount of money, if Anka does it. Anka does not need the extra money, so she decides to bring in the food for the inmate without accepting the bribe.
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C.Illegal
Your reasons :
1.
2.
3.
Which criminal justice professional is responsible for analyzing DNA evidence?
A.
police officer
B.
private detective
C.
forensic scientist
D.
paralegal
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Hinton and Yocum entered into a contract. The terms of the contract included the following language: "if either party breaches this contract, the breaching party shall pay a sum not to exceed $20,000 to the non-breaching party in addition to other damages that may be available at the time of breach." This clause of the contract is probably referring to what?
Group of answer choices
injunctive relief
incidental damages
liquidated damages
punitive damages
the person who acquires real property under the terms of a will is known as a
Answer:
Devisee
Explanation:
Devisee is the term associated to the individual who is left with the real estate property according to the terms of the bill. A devisee may or may not be related with the decedent. It is because of the presence of devisee in the will of the decedent that the devisee receives the property and becomes the owner of it. In the case where the property is left with with the devisee becomes the owner.
what is “ judical restraint” and which supreme court justices practiced it?
Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.
Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (served 1902–1932)Louis Brandeis (served 1916–1939)Felix Frankfurter (served 1939–1962)How does social change happen?
Answer:
social change happens by getting into a relationship, having a friend, new electronics
Explanation:
Paralegals and attorneys perform many of the same tasks. However, the average salary for an attorney is much higher than that of a paralegal. Why might this be?
A.
Attorneys know how to draft legal documents, and paralegals do not.
B.
Attorneys have more specialized knowledge than paralegals do.
C.
Only attorneys are allowed to handle case files.
D.
Paralegals go to school a lot longer than attorneys.
Answer:
Its C
Explanation:
a paralegal cannot handle cases like lawyers, simply because they are not authorized by the law to do so
However, the average salary for an attorney is much higher than that of a paralegal might this be Only attorneys are allowed to handle case files.
What distinguishes an attorney from a paralegal?A paralegal has had considerably less legal education than an attorney. When compared to attorneys, who must pass far more difficult tests, they often only need an associate's or bachelor's degree. It is impossible for paralegals to practice law alone. A qualified attorney must always supervise them.
Should a paralegal perform tasks that an attorney performs?The duties of a paralegal are also very similar to those of a lawyer (this is the key benefit of hiring a paralegal). For instance, paralegals frequently handle the activities listed below on behalf of their supervising attorney: Managing client communications and informing clients of the status of their cases.
To Know more about case files.
https://brainly.com/question/17096666
#SPJ2
Which statement describes the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
A. Southern states could no longer maintain racially segregated public schools
B. States could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
C. Individuals accused of serious crimes unable to pay for an attorney were entitled to a state-sponsored one
D. Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The answer is b states could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
What percentage of bills are made into laws each year?
Answer:
25%
Explanation:
A bill can be introduced in either chamber of Congress by a senator or representative who sponsors it. ... The president can approve the bill and sign it into law or not approve (veto) a bill. If the president chooses to veto a bill, in most cases Congress can vote to override that veto and the bill becomes a law.
Answer:
25%
Explanation:
Have a great day
Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will lose the case if he does. Minh-Tam decides not to let him testify, despite going against the client's expressed desires
A.Ethical
B.Unethical
C.Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Past or present racist heath care laws?
As a result of anticipatory repudiation, the non-breaching party
Select one:
a.
immediately sue for breach
b.
may mitigate damages
c.
wait until the day for performance to sue for breach
d.
all of the above
Answer:
D
Explanation:
All of the above they sue for breach
Draw Inferences In an upcoming campaign, two candidates want to run for President. Their qualifications are as follows:
Candidate A
• 47 years old
• college graduate
• lived in the U.S. through college; currently living and working in Italy
• born in the United States
Candidate B
• 54 years old
• attended college, but didn’t graduate
• born in France to American citizens
• moved to U.S. at age 20; has lived here since that time
Which candidate might have his/her candidacy questioned based on which constitutional provision?
Answer:
canidate b is the better option because you MUST LIVE IN THE US TO BE PRESIDENT.
Order the steps in a lawsuit chronologically
= Voir dire
= The defendant's case
= The discovery process begins
= Jury instructions
= Service of process on the defendant
= The settlement conference
= File the complaint
= The plaintiff's case
= Judgment
= Closing arguments
Answer:
The Trial Process
This webpage presents an overview of the formal processes and proceedings in any civil trial and a link to separate webpage that presents the specific chronology of events in the Woburn Toxic Trial. Links are also available to videoclips of Ohio State University students performing these tasks in a mock trial.
There are four main stages to a trial. In sequence, they are:
Pleading Stage - filing the complaint and the defense's motions.
Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts.
Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants.
Post Trial - concluding arguments, judge's charge to the jury, jury deliberations, announcement of judgment, motions for new trial or appeal.
Pleading Stage
Filing a Complaint - In civil proceedings the complaint is the official engagement of the plaintiff with the defense regarding the proposed "injustice" caused by the defense. This is a formal document submitted by the plaintiff to the court having jurisdiction over the complaint.
Summons - Notification by the court in which the complaint is filed as an action being brought against the defense. Service of the summons typically requires a response from the defense within a 30-day period. No response from the defense can trigger a default judgment for the plaintiff.
Motions to Dismiss - These are the defense's response or answers to the plaintiffs complaint. The responses are typically filed as motions and are intended to dismiss the claims expressed in the complaint.
Motion for Judgment - Following the defendants response to the plaintiffs claims, the parties can either choose to settle or request a judgment based on the evidence presented, or the court can decide to continue toward resolving conflict at trial. If there is no judgment made, the case proceeds to the pre-trial stage.
Pretrial Stage
Discovery or Finding of Facts - There are generally two aspects of discovery. One consists of a series of questions, known as interrogatory questions, which are posed by the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant's attorney. The other consists of recording a witnesses sworn testimony, known as a deposition. Depositions typically take place outside the courtroom, before a court recorder, with opposing counsel asking questions of the witness.
Motion for Summary Judgment - At the conclusion of discovery, the court will typically review the facts of the case and determine if there is sufficient merit to proceed to trial or to encourage the parties to settle. If the finding of facts determines the case to be frivolous or non-substantiated, the case is dismissed.
Pretrial Order - If a substantial basis for the case is determined, the court will meet with and notify the parties of the trial schedule.
The Trial
Jury Selection - From a pool of potential jurors, individuals are questioned in a process known as voire dire to determine suitability to serve as impartial juror in the specific case. The judge and counsel for both parties are involved in voire dire process, with each party trying to impanel individuals who may be sympathetic to their cause.
Opening Statements - Statements to the jury made first by the plaintiffs' attorney and then by the defense attorneys setting up the circumstances and rationale of the legal complaint (plaintiffs) and the reasons for dismissing the claim (defense).
Click here to see a videoclip of opening statements from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Plaintiff Testimony - The first part of the actual trial proceeding consists of the plaintiffs presenting their witnesses and experts to present the arguments and justifications for the complaint. The defense is permitted to cross-examine each witness in an attempt to dismiss, discredit, or disprove the witnesses statements.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Defense Testimony - After the plaintiffs' case is presented, the defendants present their case in much the same way using witnesses and experts that present direct testimony, followed by cross examination by the plaintiffs' counsel.
Click here to see a videoclip of cross examination from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Redirection and Recall - At the discretion of the judge, each witness can be redirected after cross examination by either the counsel. If critical information is not divulged during the initial testimony, counsel can request to recall a witness to the stand for additional questioning and cross examination.
Closing Arguments - Counsel for the plaintiffs and defense summarize their clients positions to remind the jurors of the facts presented in their case and to convince the jurors of veracity of their cause. Closing arguments are typically intended to be dramatic and pointed for effect.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Explanation:
write the fundamental right of arrested person which are in article 22 in the constitution of FIR
Answer:
Article 22(2) of the constitution provides that “no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed as soon as may be, of the grounds of such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.
hope it helps : )
Explanation:
Article 22(2) of the constitution provides that "no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed as soon as may be, of the grounds of such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by a legal practitionerof his choice."
What is katarungang Pambarangay
Answer: History
There has long been a traditional, local system of resolving disputes. Presidential Decree 1508 talks an unofficial "time-honored tradition of amicably settling disputes among family and barangay members at the barangay level without judicial resources".[7]
Alfredo Flores Tadiar was the principal author of Presidential Decree 1508, The Katarungang Pambarangay Law,[8] and he also wrote its implementing rules, requiring prior conciliation as a condition for judicial recourse.[citation needed] For 12 years (1980–1992), he was a member of the Committee of Consultants, Bureau of Local Government Supervision, which oversaw the nationwide operations of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law.[citation needed] Under the decree, the body was known as Lupong Tagapayapa .[7]
This decree was replaced by the Local Government Code of 1991.
Explanation: Katarungang Pambarangay
Katarungang Pambarangay, or the Barangay Justice System is a local justice system in the Philippines. It is operated by the smallest of the local government units, the barangay, and is overseen by the barangay captain, the highest elected official of the barangay and its executive.[1] The barangay captain sits on the Lupon Tagapamayapa along with other barangay residents, which is the committee that decides disputes and other matters. They do not constitute a court as they do not have judicial powers.[2]
The system exists to help decongest the regular courts and works mostly as "alternative, community-based mechanism for dispute resolution of conflicts,"[1] also described as a "compulsory mediation process at the village level."[3]
Throughout the Philippines the Barangay Justice Systems handles thousands of cases a year.[4] Since officials have more flexibility in decision-making, including from complex evidence rules, and receive some resources from government, the courts are more numerous and accessible than other courts and therefore the courts are able to hear more cases and to respond more immediately.[4]
The Katarungang Pambarangay share characteristics with similar traditional, hybrid courts in other countries such as the Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Nigeria and South Africa, among others.[5] Such courts emerged during colonial periods as Western imperial powers introduced western legal systems.[5] The Western legal systems were usually applied to westerners while the local dispute resolution systems were integrated into the Western system in a variety of ways including incorporation of local decision makers into the government in some way.[5] After independence, many states faced the same problems as their former rulers, especially "limited geographical reach of state institutions, Western-modeled institutions often divorced from community structures and expectations, and resource constraints in the justice sector."[5] Hybrid courts became a "middle ground for supporting community decision-making while simultaneously expanding the authority and reach of the state."[5]
Besides "hybrid courts", other authors have described the system as a "Non-State Justice System".[6]
Answer:
Katarungang Pambarangay, or the Barangay Justice System is a local justice system in the Philippines. It is operated by the smallest of the local government units, the barangay, and is overseen by the barangay captain, the highest elected official of the barangay and its executive.
Explanation:
Hope i helped! <3
Explain why we need to overhaul and simplify the law and how the legal system has changed. Discuss how these changes have influenced the daily lives of people in the United States? Briefly explain one example Howard gives. Choose one of the three propositions that Howard makes and explain it. According to Howard, how can freedom be rebuilt? Do you agree or disagree with Howard that the legal system is broken? Why or why not?
answer:
the questions are in bold letters. the answers are underneath
Explanation:
1. Explain why we need to overhaul and simplify the law and how the legal system has changed
The law according to howard is a powerful tool that has the power of driving human behaviors and the united states has to overhaul the laws and make the laws simple so that the Americans would have the passion to address the issues facing the US.
People live in fear of what might happen next. Due to easily getting sued as well as charges that could be pressed at work and almost in all aspects of ones life. The law is getting heavier as the time goes by. People are afraid that they may say something that would land them in court. There is the constant fear if lawsuits..
2. Discuss how these changes have influenced the daily lives of people in the United States? Briefly explain one example Howard gives.
People now find it difficult to take actions on what is their best judgements. Fewer people are standing up for themselves now.
3. Choose one of the three propositions that Howard makes and explain it.
One of his propositions is to re-establish the aims, objectives and the purposes of the law. when people know the requirements of the law they would know how best to avoid breaking it. Boundaries of the law have to be set so people will know what the law requires of them.
4. According to Howard, how can freedom be rebuilt?
Freedom can be rebuilt with effort from the society and the government agencies.
5. Do you agree or disagree with Howard that the legal system is broken? Why or why not?
I agree the legal system is broken. Too. many laws these days have people acting in certain ways. In schools for instance, school children feel they can act in anyway they like. Any correction is seen like their rights are being taken from them. Howards assessment of the healthcare system is correct. Instead of helping people the healthcare system is more concerned with how they can avoid lawsuits.
A form of government where a king or queen is the sole leader of the country and holds almost all the power.
absolute monarchy
representative democracy
communism
oligarchy
Answer:
it's the 1st one absolute monarchy
A pile of sawdust, no net, a man dies.
WHAT HAPPENED?
Answer:
he suffocated
Explanation:
This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
the legislature.
confederal system
parliamentary
unitary
federal
Which 3 statements are true about the Receipt Capture feature in QuickBooks Online?(Select all that apply)
•
• 1 You can match receipts to existing transactions
•
• 2 You can create new transactions from imported receipts
•
• 3 You can create bills or invoice transactions
•
• 4 You can create bills or expense transactions
•
• 5 You can import receipts using the AirDrop feature on your iOS device
•
• 6 Receipts captured via the mobile app do not need to be reviewed in the browser version
Is it 1 , 2 and 4
Thank you
Answer:
The true statements about the Receipt Capture feature in QuickBooks Online are :
1. You can match receipts to existing transactions.
2. You can create new transactions from imported receipts.
4. You can create bills or expense transactions.
Explanation:
QuickBooks refers to an accounting software that is marketed and developed by Intuit incorporation.
The products of QuickBooks are geared toward the small as well as medium-sized businesses. It offer accounting applications and other services such as making business payments, payroll functions and managing and paying bills.
In such cases, in the QuickBooks, using the Receipt Capture features ensures that :
we can match and compare the pay receipts to the existing transactions.we can also create the new transactions from the imported receipts from other platforms as well.we can create expense transactions or bills easily in the QuickBooks online.Thus, the correct option is (1), (2) and (4).
Learn More :
https://brainly.com/question/24253740
regarding u.s. citizenship what does the concept of naturalization mean?
A) People born to citizen parents are citizens by law.
B) People born in order nations who complete a legal process may become citizens.
C) People born in other nations become citizens after a certain period of residency.
D) People born in the United States proper are citizens by nature of birth.
Answer:
D) People born in the United States proper are citizens by nature of birth.
